Problems with File I/O in  java applications at KVM/CLDC Layer

I wrote couple of programs made use of Connector.open with "file" protocol to perform File I/O.
Code snippet from java application for File Read
InputConnection conn = (InputConnection)
Connector.open("file:/input.txt", Connector.READ );
I got javax.microedition.io.ConnectionNotFoundException: The requested protocol does not exist file:/input.txt
Code snippet from java application for File Write
OutputConnection conn = (OutputConnection)
Connector.open( "file:/input.txt;append=true", Connector.WRITE );
I got javax.microedition.io.ConnectionNotFoundException: The requested protocol does not exist file:/input.txt;append=true
I have couple of questions
1. Does Connector class support "file" protocol at KVM/CLDC layer of Sun's reference implementation?
2. If so, what could I be doing wrong?
Thanks,
Nuthan
I'm looking forward to hear from you.

I believe you can find the right answer here :
http://forum.java.sun.com/thread.jsp?forum=50&thread=307980
Hope that will help.
bye

Similar Messages

  • Problem with CMP BEAN ON SUN JAVA APPLICATION SERVER 1.3.1

    I am trying to deploy an entity bean with container managed persistence on sun java app. server 1.3.1. When I go for Deploy, the error 'SQL code not generated for following beans' is comming, when verified with verifier tool, the error shown is 'transaction attributes are not specified' , What should be the problem ?

    Which appserver are you using exactly? the J2EE 1.3.1 RI, SJAS 7.0, SJSAS 7.1....etc
    You need to make sure for that you have specified the correct deployment attributes for your CMP methods. You can pull the ear/jar into deploytool and review it there

  • Problem with very simple 2 threads java application

    Hi,
    As fa as i'm concerned this is a thread licecycle:
    1. thread created: it is dead.
    2. thread started: it is now alive.
    3. thread executes its run method: it is alive during this method.
    4. after thread finishes its run method: it is dead.
    No I have simple JUnit code:
    public void testThreads() throws Exception {
    WorkTest work = new WorkTest() {
    public void release() {
    // TODO Auto-generated method stub
    public void run() {
    for (int i=0;i<1000;i++){
    log.debug(i+":11111111111");
    //System.out.println(i+":11111111111");
    WorkTest work2 = new WorkTest() {
    public void release() {
    // TODO Auto-generated method stub
    public void run() {
    for (int i=0;i<1000;i++){
    log.debug(i+":22222222222");
    Thread workerThread = new Thread(work);
    Thread workerThread2 = new Thread(work2);
    workerThread.start();
    //workerThread.join();
    workerThread2.start();
    //workerThread2.join();
    And
    public interface WorkTest extends Runnable {
    public abstract void release();
    And that's it..
    On the console I see 999 iterations of both threads only if i uncomment
    //workerThread.join();
    //workerThread2.join();
    In other case I see random number of iterations - JUNIT finishes and Thread1 made 54 and Thread2 233 iterations - the numbers are different every time i start the JUnit..
    What I want? Not to wait until the first one finishes - I want them to start at the same time and they must FINISH their tasks...
    Please help me asap :(

    This is very simple... Look at your code:
    workerThread.start();
    workerThread.join();
    workerThread2.start();
    workerThread2.join();What are you doing here? You start the first thread, then you call join(), which waits until it finishes. Then after it's finished, you start the second thread and wait until it finishes. You should simply do this:
    workerThread.start();
    workerThread2.start();
    workerThread.join();
    workerThread2.join();I.e., you start the 2 threads and then you wait (first for the first one, then for the second one).

  • Why  would an error pop up saying the installer is damaged. The Installer can't open the package. There may be a problem with file ownership or permissions. when trying to install java 7?

    why  would an error pop up saying the installer is damaged. The Installer can’t open the package. There may be a problem with file ownership or permissions. when trying to install java 7?

    Launch the Console application in any of the following ways:
    ☞ Enter the first few letters of its name into a Spotlight search. Select it in the results (it should be at the top.)
    ☞ In the Finder, select Go ▹ Utilities from the menu bar, or press the key combination shift-command-U. The application is in the folder that opens.
    ☞ Open LaunchPad. Click Utilities, then Console in the icon grid.
    Select
    /var/log ▹ install.log
    from the hierarchical list on the left. If you don't see that list, select
    View ▹ Show Log List
    from the menu bar. Then select the messages from the last installation or update attempt, starting from the time when you initiated it. If you're not sure when that was, click the Clear Display button in the toolbar of the Console window and then try the installation again.
    Copy the messages to the Clipboard by pressing the key combination command-C. Paste into a reply to this message (command-V).
    If there are runs of repeated messages, post only one example of each. Don’t post many repetitions of the same message.
    When posting a log extract, be selective. Don't post more than is requested.
    Please do not indiscriminately dump thousands of lines from the log into this discussion.
    Important: Some private information, such as your name, may appear in the log. Edit it out by search-and-replace in a text editor before posting.

  • I suddenly have this error message on FireFoxthis message pops up: "Could not initialize the application's security component. The most likely cause is problems with files in your application's profile directory. Please check that this directory has no re

    I suddenly encounter this error message from Fire Fox.
    Could not initialize the application's security component. The most likely cause is problems with files in your application's profile directory. Please check that this directory has no read/write restrictions and your hard disk is not full or close to full. It is recommended that you exit the application and fix the problem. If you continue to use this session, you might see incorrect application behaviour when accessing security features.
    I uninstalled the browser and download a new version but it does not resolve the issue.
    I know my hard disc has ample space. I do NOT know where to find the Profile directory to fix the read restriction box.
    == This happened ==
    Every time Firefox opened
    == After something about security add-on of Norton pop up by itself. ==
    == User Agent ==
    Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 7.0; Windows NT 5.1; MSN Optimized;US)

    This link shows things to check - https://support.mozilla.com/kb/Could+not+initialize+the+browser+security+component

  • New WIN7 System, FFox gives error "Could not initialize the application's security component. The most likely cause is problems with files in your application's profile directory" - will not go to any site.

    New Windows 7 computer. After installing Firefox, every time I bring it up I get the following message:
    "Could not initialize the application's security component. The most likely cause is problems with files in your application's profile directory. Please check that this directory has no read/write restrictions and your hard disk is not full or close to full. It is recommended that you exit the application and fix the problem. If you continue to use this session, you might see incorrect application behaviour when accessing security features."
    Then Firefox comes up, but will not function at all - can enter url address, but will not respond to ANY clicks, so can not go to any site.

    This link shows how to fix this - https://support.mozilla.com/kb/Could+not+initialize+the+browser+security+component

  • I keep getting this diologue box as I start up Firefox "Could not initialise the application's security component. The most probable cause is problems with files in your browser's profile directory. ... what should I do exactly?

    I keep getting the following dialogue box when I start Firefox " Could not initialise the application's security component. The most probable cause is problems with files in your browser's profile directory. Please check that this directory has no read/write restrictions." I am not sure how to find or change the profile directory. I have gone to the Options: General: Save files to ...box but it wont allow me to browse to another file and the box remains blank. ideas please!

    See [[Could not initialize the browser security component]]
    Continue here: [/questions/780717]

  • This message [Ubuntu repositories or Mozilla download: " There is no Profile folder Could not initialize the application's security component. The most likely cause is problems with files in your application's profile directory....

    Ubuntu 11.04: I have been getting this message whenever I install Firefox from the repositories and downloading the tar file. I cannot use Firefox! " There is no Profile folder Could not initialize the application's security component. The most likely cause is problems with files in your application's profile directory. Please check that this directory has no read/write restrictions and your hard disk is not full or close to full. It is recommended that you exit the application and fix the problem. If you continue to use this session, you might see incorrect application behaviour when accessing security features."Firefox does not respond to any addresses or a google search. Indeed it responds to nothing. There is no Profile folder!

    Uninstalling Firefox on Linux
    * http://kb.mozillazine.org/Uninstalling_Firefox#On_Linux
    * http://kb.mozillazine.org/Installation_directory#Linux
    * Removing user profile data - http://kb.mozillazine.org/Uninstalling_Firefox#Removing_user_profile_data
    After all is done, Restart your system.
    Installing Firefox on Linux
    * https://support.mozilla.com/en-US/kb/Installing%20Firefox%20on%20Linux
    Check and tell if its working.

  • Why do I get an alert saying "Could not initialise the application's security component. The most probable cause is problems with files in your browser's profile directory. How can I solve it??

    The full alert is " Could not initialise the application's security component. The most probable cause is problems with files in your browser's profile directory. Please check that this directory has no read/write restrictions and your hard drive is not full or close to full. It is recommended that you exit the browser and fix the problem. If you continue to use this browser session, you might see incorrect browser behaviour when accessing security features."
    This is just started three/four days ago. I need assistance quickly as I can't access any secure sites e.g bank accounts/homepage etc.

    See [[Could not initialize the browser security component]]

  • When I open Firefox the following alert appears: "Could not initialize the application's security component. The most likely cause is problems with files in your application's profile directory." There is a solution in the forum but only for Windows based

    When I open the application the following alert appears: "Could not initialize the application's security component. The most likely cause is problems with files in your application's profile directory." There is a solution on the support site but only for Windows-based Firefox, and I'm a Mac user. I have plenty of room on my hard disk.
    == This happened ==
    Every time Firefox opened
    == Two days ago, for no apparent reason.

    In Mac OS X v10.7, the $HOME/Library folder is a hidden folder.
    Open Finder and use one of these:
    * Go > Go To Folder (Shift-Command-G) and in the dialog type: ~/Library
    * Open the "Go" menu and hold down the Option key to make the Library appear
    You can also use this command in a Terminal window to remove the hidden flag.
    * Mac HD > Applications > Utilities > Terminal
    * chflags nohidden ~/Library

  • Problem with file descriptors not released by JMF

    Hi,
    I have a problem with file descriptors not released by JMF. My application opens a video file, creates a DataSource and a DataProcessor and the video frames generated are transmitted using the RTP protocol. Once video transmission ends up, if we stop and close the DataProcessor associated to the DataSource, the file descriptor identifying the video file is not released (checkable through /proc/pid/fd). If we repeat this processing once and again, the process reaches the maximum number of file descriptors allowed by the operating system.
    The same problem has been reproduced with JMF-2.1.1e-Linux in several environments:
    - Red Hat 7.3, Fedora Core 4
    - jdk1.5.0_04, j2re1.4.2, j2sdk1.4.2, Blackdown Java
    This is part of the source code:
    // video.avi with tracks audio(PCMU) and video(H263)
    String url="video.avi";
    if ((ml = new MediaLocator(url)) == null) {
    Logger.log(ambito,refTrazas+"Cannot build media locator from: " + url);
    try {
    // Create a DataSource given the media locator.
    Logger.log(ambito,refTrazas+"Creating JMF data source");
    try
    ds = Manager.createDataSource(ml);
    catch (Exception e) {
    Logger.log(ambito,refTrazas+"Cannot create DataSource from: " + ml);
    return 1;
    p = Manager.createProcessor(ds);
    } catch (Exception e) {
    Logger.log(ambito,refTrazas+"Failed to create a processor from the given url: " + e);
    return 1;
    } // end try-catch
    p.addControllerListener(this);
    Logger.log(ambito,refTrazas+"Configure Processor.");
    // Put the Processor into configured state.
    p.configure();
    if (!waitForState(p.Configured))
    Logger.log(ambito,refTrazas+"Failed to configure the processor.");
    p.close();
    p=null;
    return 1;
    Logger.log(ambito,refTrazas+"Configured Processor OK.");
    // So I can use it as a player.
    p.setContentDescriptor(new FileTypeDescriptor(FileTypeDescriptor.RAW_RTP));
    // videoTrack: track control for the video track
    DrawFrame draw= new DrawFrame(this);
    // Instantiate and set the frame access codec to the data flow path.
    try {
    Codec codec[] = {
    draw,
    new com.sun.media.codec.video.colorspace.JavaRGBToYUV(),
    new com.ibm.media.codec.video.h263.NativeEncoder()};
    videoTrack.setCodecChain(codec);
    } catch (UnsupportedPlugInException e) {
    Logger.log(ambito,refTrazas+"The processor does not support effects.");
    } // end try-catch CodecChain creation
    p.realize();
    if (!waitForState(p.Realized))
    Logger.log(ambito,refTrazas+"Failed to realize the processor.");
    return 1;
    Logger.log(ambito,refTrazas+"realized processor OK.");
    /* After realize processor: THESE LINES OF SOURCE CODE DOES NOT RELEASE ITS FILE DESCRIPTOR !!!!!
    p.stop();
    p.deallocate();
    p.close();
    return 0;
    // It continues up to the end of the transmission, properly drawing each video frame and transmit them
    Logger.log(ambito,refTrazas+" Create Transmit.");
    try {
    int result = createTransmitter();
    } catch (Exception e) {
    Logger.log(ambito,refTrazas+"Error Create Transmitter.");
    return 1;
    } // end try-catch transmitter
    Logger.log(ambito,refTrazas+"Start Procesor.");
    // Start the processor.
    p.start();
    return 0;
    } // end of main code
    * stop when event "EndOfMediaEvent"
    public int stop () {
    try {   
    /* THIS PIECE OF CODE AND VARIATIONS HAVE BEEN TESTED
    AND THE FILE DESCRIPTOR IS NEVER RELEASED */
    p.stop();
    p.deallocate();
    p.close();
    p= null;
    for (int i = 0; i < rtpMgrs.length; i++)
    if (rtpMgrs==null) continue;
    Logger.log(ambito, refTrazas + "removeTargets;");
    rtpMgrs[i].removeTargets( "Session ended.");
    rtpMgrs[i].dispose();
    rtpMgrs[i]=null;
    } catch (Exception e) {
    Logger.log(ambito,refTrazas+"Error Stoping:"+e);
    return 1;
    return 0;
    } // end of stop()
    * Controller Listener.
    public void controllerUpdate(ControllerEvent evt) {
    Logger.log(ambito,refTrazas+"\nControllerEvent."+evt.toString());
    if (evt instanceof ConfigureCompleteEvent ||
    evt instanceof RealizeCompleteEvent ||
    evt instanceof PrefetchCompleteEvent) {
    synchronized (waitSync) {
    stateTransitionOK = true;
    waitSync.notifyAll();
    } else if (evt instanceof ResourceUnavailableEvent) {
    synchronized (waitSync) {
    stateTransitionOK = false;
    waitSync.notifyAll();
    } else if (evt instanceof EndOfMediaEvent) {
    Logger.log(ambito,refTrazas+"\nEvento EndOfMediaEvent.");
    this.stop();
    else if (evt instanceof ControllerClosedEvent)
    Logger.log(ambito,refTrazas+"\nEvent ControllerClosedEvent");
    close = true;
    waitSync.notifyAll();
    else if (evt instanceof StopByRequestEvent)
    Logger.log(ambito,refTrazas+"\nEvent StopByRequestEvent");
    stop =true;
    waitSync.notifyAll();
    Many thanks.

    Its a bug on H263, if you test it without h263 track or with other video codec, the release will be ok.
    You can try to use a not-Sun h263 codec like the one from fobs or jffmpeg projects.

  • Newbie : memory problem with file uploading

    Hello
    I'm exdending a web app based on jsf and , being new to it and java in general, i'm having a problem with file uploading.
    The customer needs to upload large file (more than 30 MB). The application accomplish this using a fileupload component, to let the user select the file, and passing the array of bytes to a web service method.
    I'm using netbeans 6, tomcat 5.5.
    When i try to upload a file too large i got an outofmemory on the local tomcat. So i've rised jvm memory and going on with tests i've found that growing the size i got an http 500 error from the service (the developer of the service has found an out of memory too ).
    I think the service is not modifiable, so i were asking if threre were a way to optimize the file uploading process (a component, a library, a pattern ...) or my only chioice is to rise available memory on both sides.
    I've notice the wsdl declares as base64binary type the data parameter , while netbeans 6 generates a client proxy with a byte[] parameter. Is correct or is a netbeans problem?
    searching with google i've found few thing i haven't fully understood due to my lack of experience:
    the mtom , how can evaluate if it's suitable to help in my problem (i suppose it involves more the web service rather than the client)
    something about the size of a soap body.
    thank you in advance
    Stefano

    Which component exactly are you using? Declaring the stream as a raw byte[] is certainly not efficient. Write code yourself, don't let it autogenerate.
    I can highly recommend you the Tomahawk t:inputFileUpload component. It is easy to integrate in Mojarra. You can find here an useful article: [http://balusc.blogspot.com/2008/02/uploading-files-with-jsf.html].

  • Problems with File Transfers Over Firewire 800

    Problems with File Transfers Over Firewire 800.
    Over the past month, I have had problems when transfering files from my harddrive, over Firewire 800 to a portable drive. I usually transfer very large files (20gb or more) to the portable drives for moving files around. When I drag a file over to copy onto a drive, the transfer starts normally. If I drag more files to copy over, the computer screen goes darker and a large icon comes up that looks like a power button icon. It tells me to restart, so I have to do a hard shut down on my G5. Weird. I also get the dark screen of death sometimes when I am transfering those large files and open another application to do some work while it's copying. It's killing me. I am having to sit here and wait for the transfer to finish before I can do anything.
    Any thoughts...
    Dual 2.7 GHz PowerPC G5
    Mac OSX 10.4.3
    Dual 2.7 GHz PowerPC G5   Mac OS X (10.4.3)  

    Have you run the Apple Hardware Test? Sounds like it could be a RAM problem.

  • Problem with File Based replication in Weblogic Express 10

    Hi,
              We have Web application (exploded war) file deployed on Weblogic Express 10, to a Cluster of three Managed Servers (all three on different physical machines).
              We are using File based session persistance in weblogic.xml
              We have a shared location for all the three servers where we will be sharing the Session data.
              When we start the application, its works fine and is very fast, but after sometime the application slows down.
              Troubleshooting the Issue we found that its a problem with file based replication. By using File based replication every user session is stored in form of directory inside shared directory. So after sometime thousands of directories are created inside the shared directory where the session information is stored. So when we access the application, its waiting for lot of time with Message Session Monitor .... (this is because its browsing through the shared session storage directory for lot of time for session information as it has lot of directories) and finally after a long time like 10 mins we get the Application Home Page.
              When we clean up all the saved sessions inside shared directory, the application works fine, But we will see the same sometime later may be after 3 or 4 hours when the shared session directory has lot of session information stored in it.
              Is there a way to clean up the saved session information on file system as soon as that user session is closed by using file based replication.
              We cannot used Inmemory replication as our Appl doesnt support it.
              Please advice as it is a major show stopper in our Production Mirror env.
              Weblogic Consultant

    It is possible to reduce number of live session by configuring very low timeout-secs weblogic.xml. Default is 60 minutes.
              More details are here..
              http://e-docs.bea.com/wls/docs100/webapp/weblogic_xml.html#wp1071982
              Jayesh
              Yagna Sys

  • Problem with file permissions

    Hello all,
    I am making a simple HttpServlet, which takes input
    from html page and saves in to a file, but I'm having a
    bit of a problem with file permissions.
    I'm getting the following exception
    java.security.AccessControlException: access denied (java.io.FilePermission ./data/result read)
         java.security.AccessControlContext.checkPermission(AccessControlContext.java:264)
         java.security.AccessController.checkPermission(AccessController.java:427)
         java.lang.SecurityManager.checkPermission(SecurityManager.java:532)
         java.lang.SecurityManager.checkRead(SecurityManager.java:871)
         java.io.File.exists(File.java:700)
         SyksyHTTPServlet.doPost(SyksyHTTPServlet.java:31)
         javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:709)
         javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:802)
         sun.reflect.GeneratedMethodAccessor52.invoke(Unknown Source)
         sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25)
         java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:585)
         org.apache.catalina.security.SecurityUtil$1.run(SecurityUtil.java:243)
         java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(Native Method)
         javax.security.auth.Subject.doAsPrivileged(Subject.java:517)
         org.apache.catalina.security.SecurityUtil.execute(SecurityUtil.java:275)
         org.apache.catalina.security.SecurityUtil.doAsPrivilege(SecurityUtil.java:161)The exception seems to occur when I'm trying to check whether the file already
    exists or not.
    The data directory has all permissions (read, write and execute) set for all users,
    and I have made an empty file called result inside the data directory for testing.
    This file has read and write permissions enabled for all users.
    Here's my code
    import javax.servlet.*;
    import javax.servlet.http.*;
    import java.io.*;
    import java.util.Enumeration;
    import java.util.List;
    import java.util.ArrayList;
    public class SyksyHTTPServlet extends HttpServlet
         public void doPost(HttpServletRequest request, HttpServletResponse response) throws ServletException, IOException
              int totalCount = 0;
              List list;
              String song = request.getParameter("song");
              PrintWriter out = response.getWriter();
              File file = new File("./data/result");
              if(file.exists())  // this is line 31, which seems to cause the exception
                   list = readFile(file);
              else
                   file.createNewFile();
                   list = new ArrayList();
              list.add(song);
              writeFile(file, list);
              for(int i = 0 ; i < list.size() ; i++)
                   out.println(list.get(i));
         public void doGet(HttpServletRequest request, HttpServletResponse response) throws ServletException, IOException
              doPost(request, response);
         private List readFile(File file)
              List list = null;
              try
                   FileInputStream fis = new FileInputStream(file);
                   ObjectInputStream ois = new ObjectInputStream(fis);
                   list = (ArrayList)ois.readObject();
                   ois.close();
              catch(Exception e)
                   e.printStackTrace();
              return list;
         private void writeFile(File file, List list)
              try
                   FileOutputStream fos = new FileOutputStream(file);
                   ObjectOutputStream oos = new ObjectOutputStream(fos);
                   oos.writeObject(list);
                   oos.flush();
                   oos.close();
              catch(Exception e)
                   e.printStackTrace();
    }I'm using Tomcat 5.5 on Ubuntu Linux, if that has anything to do with this.
    I'll appreciate all help.
    kari-matti

    Hello again.
    I'm still having problems with this. I made
    a simple servlet that reads from and writes
    to text file. The reading part work fine on my
    computer, but the writing doesn't, not even
    an exception is thrown if the file exists that
    I'm trying to write to. If I try to create a new
    file I'll get an exception about file permissions.
    I also asked a friend of mine to try this same
    servlet on his windows computer and it works
    as it should.
    Here's the code
    import javax.servlet.*;
    import javax.servlet.http.*;
    import java.io.*;
    public class ReadServlet extends HttpServlet
         public void doPost(HttpServletRequest request, HttpServletResponse response) throws ServletException, IOException
              String s = "";
              PrintWriter out = response.getWriter();
              String docroot = getServletContext().getRealPath( "/" );
              out.println("docroot: "+docroot);
              File file = new File(docroot+"test.txt");
              if(file.exists())
                   s = readFile(file);
                   out.println(s);
              else
                   out.println("file not found");
                   //file.createNewFile();                    // causes exception
                   //out.println("new file created.");
              writeFile(file, "written by servlet");
              out.println("Now look in the file "+file.getPath());
              out.println("and see if it contains text 'written by servlet'");
         public void doGet(HttpServletRequest request, HttpServletResponse response) throws ServletException, IOException
              doPost(request, response);
         private String readFile(File file)
              FileInputStream fis = null;
              BufferedInputStream bis = null;
              DataInputStream dis = null;
              String s = "";
              try
                   fis = new FileInputStream(file);
                   bis = new BufferedInputStream(fis);
                   dis = new DataInputStream(bis);
                   s = dis.readLine();
                   fis.close();
                   bis.close();
                   dis.close();
              catch(Exception e)
                   e.printStackTrace();
              return s;
         private void writeFile(File file, String s)
              FileOutputStream fos = null;
              BufferedOutputStream bos = null;
              DataOutputStream dos = null;
              try
                   fos = new FileOutputStream(file);
                   bos = new BufferedOutputStream(fos);
                   dos = new DataOutputStream(bos);
                   dos.writeChars(s);
                   fos.flush();
                   bos.flush();
                   dos.flush();
                   fos.close();
                   bos.close();
                   dos.close();
              catch(Exception e)
                   e.printStackTrace();
    }And if someone wants to test this servlet I can
    give a war package.
    Any advices?
    kari-matti

Maybe you are looking for

  • 5800 XM lifestory - get your popcorn ready people

    Hello everyone. This is my first post here as I don't know where else to put it. It is quite long as it will go through alot of problems I have occured and I dont know what to do so please help. It may give you soloutions to some of your problems too

  • Background Image on a Report Region

    Greetings, Is it possible to put a background image on a report region? Using the code shown below I can get an image on most other region types, but the code simply doesn't work on a report region. Thanks in advance for your help, Tony REGION HEADER

  • Hascode without instance variable: Urgent

    Hi All I have to write hashCode() method correspond to the equals() method in the same class. But I dont have any class level variable in this class, I am not able to generate the hashCode() method automatically from Eclise. My equals method looks li

  • Bill Details

    Is it possible to obtain the content of a text conversation on one of the phones on my plan?

  • No sound from messaging after ios 5 update

    I updated my phone and I cannot get the sound to work on the SMS messaging as to when I receive a text from my husband or anybody. I looked in the phone and it is set up to play sound but still nothing. All the other sounds works fine. I also had iss