Problems with IE and 128-bit encryption

Hello. I'm having a problem with 128-bit SSL and Internet Explorer.
I'm using WebLogic 5.1 (128-bit build) and a Verisign certificate.
We're seeing some strange behavior with Internet Explorer. It seems to
work fine from some machines, but doesn't work from others. On the ones
that it doesn't work, it gives the "The page cannot be displayed"
message. I've tried this with IE 4.0.1 (with 128-bit patch) and IE 5.5
(128-bit by default) and have the same problems with both. We're seeing
this problem across various Windows operating systems, but aren't seeing
any pattern there. Any ideas as to what might be the problem?
Thanks in advance,
Steve

This forum is for Microsoft Exchange. Consider posting your question in the most appropriate Windows 8.1 forum here:
http://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/windows/en-US/home?category=w8itpro
Ed Crowley MVP "There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral problems."

Similar Messages

Problems with IE and 128-bit encryption -- correction

Repost with corrected e-mail address -- sorry!
Hello. I'm having a problem with 128-bit SSL and Internet Explorer.
I'm using WebLogic 5.1 (128-bit build) and a Verisign certificate.
We're seeing some strange behavior with Internet Explorer. It seems to
work fine from some machines, but doesn't work from others. On the ones
that it doesn't work, it gives the "The page cannot be displayed"
message. I've tried this with IE 4.0.1 (with 128-bit patch) and IE 5.5
(128-bit by default) and have the same problems with both. We're seeing
this problem across various Windows operating systems, but aren't seeing
any pattern there. Any ideas as to what might be the problem?
Thanks in advance,
Steve

The Mozilla browsers which include Firefox has supported 256-bit even encryption for a long time now.
The issue could perhaps be the e-qip site is still looking for the old obsolete '''U''' in the useragent which was used to specify the encryption strength of 128-bit though 256-bit has been supported for a long while already at time by Mozilla applications. This "U" was removed in Firefox useragent as of 4.0 which was released March 22nd, 2011. The old 3.6.x was the last to have it.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_agent#Encryption_strength_notations
https://hacks.mozilla.org/2010/09/final-user-agent-string-for-firefox-4/

I miss my Greasemonkey, I understand it's a problem with FF4 and 64 bit.

After upgrading to 4 I saw that my Grease monkey was missing. I tried to download it but it evidentaly is not compatible with my 64 bit system.

same problem sooo howare we supposed to turn greasemonkey on and off???

Problems with 32 and 64 bits

Hello everybody !
Here is my problem : I work on a laptop running Fedora Core 5 64 bits. I installed the JDK 1.5 and java3d for AMD64. But when I want to run an application (that runs well under Windows or other Linux systems), I've got errors.
The app calls libj3dcore-ogl.so (set in /opt/jdk/jre/lib/amd64) which calls libjvm.so that can only be found in /opt/jdk/jre/lib/i386/client.
The error says something like WRONG ELF CLASS 32 so I think it does not like seeing a 32 bits lib called by a 64 bits lib.
Am I correct ?
Whether I am wrong or not, what can I do to solve that ?
Thanks a lot.
Bye.

Hi again.
The problem is solved : I installed a 32 bits version of java3d and launch my app with the java of the JDK and... it almost works ! I now have a problem of GLX version (1.2 when 1.3 is required)
Bye.

128 bit encryption for e-qip????? Is it possiable to open this site with version 33.0

As ive seen in other posts Im having a problem with the e-qip website. It states that I dont have 128 bit encryption. Im running firefox 33.0 It has a walk through on how to configure firefox to work with the site but the directions are obviously old and I dont have any of the controls they are adjusting!

The Mozilla browsers which include Firefox has supported 256-bit even encryption for a long time now.
The issue could perhaps be the e-qip site is still looking for the old obsolete '''U''' in the useragent which was used to specify the encryption strength of 128-bit though 256-bit has been supported for a long while already at time by Mozilla applications. This "U" was removed in Firefox useragent as of 4.0 which was released March 22nd, 2011. The old 3.6.x was the last to have it.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_agent#Encryption_strength_notations
https://hacks.mozilla.org/2010/09/final-user-agent-string-for-firefox-4/

Where can I get Messaging Server 3.5 with 128-bit encryption?

Where can I get Messaging Server 3.5 with 128-bit encryption?
<P>
Messaging Server 3.5 is available for export (40-bit encryption)
and domestic (128-bit encryption). The domestic version includes
support for Fortezza.

It can be updated from any computer with an Internet connection but is best done from the computer which it normally syncs with. The update itself is free; if you have someone do it for you, you may be charged.
Click here for installation instructions.
(88299)

SSL, 128-bit encryption problem

Hi
I need to establish a connection over SSL with 128-bit encryption from my
client application to Active Directory. But when a connection is established
I look at the System log and see the cipher strength is only 56.
Does anybody have an idea how can I raise the cipher strength?
Thanks

Sorry,
It was my fault. I used 56-bit SDK. After upgrade all is perfect.
"Gennady" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:9mgd4d$[email protected]..
Hi
I need to establish a connection over SSL with 128-bit encryption from my
client application to Active Directory. But when a connection isestablished
I look at the System log and see the cipher strength is only 56.
Does anybody have an idea how can I raise the cipher strength?
Thanks

Problem connecting wirelessly from iMac to NETGEAR router, get invalid password message with WPA and WPA-2 encryption in place but if I remove them, so no security, can connect without a problem. Help!!

Problem connecting wirelessly from iMac to NETGEAR router, get invalid password message with WPA and WPA-2 encryption in place but if I remove them, so no security, can connect without a problem. Help!!

Thank you for your suggestion but I have already had a couple of phone sessions with NETGEAR support and they don't see any problems with the router settings etc. They referred me to Apple support, who helped me discover that it is possible to communicate with the router but only if I turn off the encryption/security software, which I don't want to do. The frustrating thing is that I can connect wirelessly from a laptop running Windows 7 and two Anroid smart phones, with WPA-2 in place, without a problem. Do you have any other ideas?

I need at least 128 bit encryption to access secure sites. What level of encryption does Firefox have and how do I check it?

Many banking sites require you to confirm that you have at least 128 bit encryption on your browser. I allowed a site to check the encryption on my browser (Firefox/Windows) and was told I didn't have at least 128 bit encryption. I'm not the most computer savvy, so I don't know how to check or increase encryption, so if someone could guide me, I'd really appreciate it.

Right-click on the web page and select '''View Page Info'''. The '''Security''' tab will show the level of encryption being used in "Technical Details" at the bottom of that tab.
Firefox matches the level of encryption used by any secure website, and will easily do more that 128-bit encryption.

I am currently using a desk top imac with firefox as the browser. I need to access a website that requires 128 bit encryption. How do I increase bit encryption?

when I log into view my accounts, a pop up asks me to use either explorer or netscape with 128 bit encryption. since i use a mac, i do not have either. can i up the encryption using firefox?

https://support.mozilla.com/en-US/questions/903234
see also SSL Encryption Report( fortify net) in '''cor-el''' reply, in support.mozilla link inside the above link.
thank you

128 bit encryption requirement not working

Using S1 6.0 sp5 on solaris 8, connecting to WAS 4.5 application servers.
The require 128 bit encryption setting is in obj.conf with an error page to serve if lower than 128 bit encryption is used.
This works fine for all plain text html requests, however, when a request goes to the websphere application the encryption requirement is ignored.
Has anyone seen anything of this nature before?

I'm not using SiteMinder or weblogic, my suggestion was based on your problem description. If you can show us your obj.conf file, we can check and try to find out a solution. You are right, AuthTrans will come before PathCheck but this should still allow PathCheck stage functions to be processed when the request processing goes through the pathcheck stage....I don't know how SiteMinder implements the SAF though.
Thanks
Manish

WRT54GS V7 128 BIT ENCRYPTION

I just this morning bought a new wireless router, ran home and hooked it up. I have had 3 other Lynksys (wired) routers in the past, do all my own work from mechanical to software and LAN.
The initial setup went fine with the first desktop PC, running Windows XP Pro. A second desktop set up fine, also running XP Pro. I figured all would go fine with the laptop running the same thing. However, after numerous times trying to setup a laptop with no joy, I had to call tech support.
The tech and went through all the settings and verified my work, just to find all was right (I knew it was, I had checked it so many times). The encryption setting was to 128 bit. She had me reset that to 64 bit and all is now functioning perfectly. I have not had much experience with encryption problems before.
So my questions are:
1. Is there a problem with the 128 bit encryption protocol in the router or in my laptop?
2. Is this something to worry about?

Answers to your question:
1. there is no problem with your 128 bit protocol with the laptop nor the router. its just that 128 bit is a very long number and letters and it is case sensitive user might find a hard time trying to but it in next time. that is why 64 bit is oftenly used its for your own benefit. hehe
2. and this is not something to worry about.
PATIENCE IS A VIRTUE ;p

New iPad asks for WiFi password. There is none. My WiFi uses WEP 128 bit encryption, but there is no "password" to enter.

Brand new to the iPad. It's asking for a password to the WiFi network in my home. There is no "password" as such associated with this WiFi network. It uses WEP 128 bit encryption where each byte is a hexadecimal number and is called a "key" Typing this lengthy thing in gives me no results. The iPad keeps on asking for a password. I have three computers and a DVD hooked to the network which has been working for a decade, so that's not the issue.
Basically I'm stuck not being able to get onto the WiFi system.

iOS 6 Wifi Problems/Fixes
Fix For iOS 6 WiFi Problems?
http://tabletcrunch.com/2012/09/27/fix-ios-6-wifi-problems/
Did iOS 6 Screw Your Wi-Fi? Here’s How to Fix It
http://gizmodo.com/5944761/does-ios-6-have-a-wi+fi-bug
How To Fix Wi-Fi Connectivity Issue After Upgrading To iOS 6
http://www.iphonehacks.com/2012/09/fix-wi-fi-connectivity-issue-after-upgrading- to-ios-6.html
iOS 6 iPad 3 wi-fi "connection fix" for netgear router
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XsWS4ha-dn0
Apple's iOS 6 Wi-Fi problems
http://www.zdnet.com/apples-ios-6-wi-fi-problems-linger-on-7000004799/
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Look at iOS Troubleshooting Wi-Fi networks and connections http://support.apple.com/kb/TS1398
iPad: Issues connecting to Wi-Fi networks http://support.apple.com/kb/ts3304
WiFi Connecting/Troubleshooting
http://www.apple.com/support/ipad/wifi/
How to Fix: My iPad Won't Connect to WiFi
http://ipad.about.com/od/iPad_Troubleshooting/ss/How-To-Fix-My-Ipad-Wont-Connect -To-Wi-Fi.htm
iOS: Connecting to the Internet
http://support.apple.com/kb/HT1695
iOS: Recommended settings for Wi-Fi routers and access points http://support.apple.com/kb/HT4199
Additional things to try.
Try this first. Turn Off your iPad. Then turn Off (disconnect power cord for 30 seconds or longer) the wireless router & then back On. Now boot your iPad. Hopefully it will see the WiFi.
Go to Settings>Wi-Fi and turn Off. Then while at Settings>Wi-Fi, turn back On and chose a Network.
Change the channel on your wireless router (Auto or Channel 6 is best). Instructions at http://macintoshhowto.com/advanced/how-to-get-a-good-range-on-your-wireless-netw ork.html
Another thing to try - Go into your router security settings and change from WEP to WPA with AES.
How to Quickly Fix iPad 3 Wi-Fi Reception Problems
http://osxdaily.com/2012/03/21/fix-new-ipad-3-wi-fi-reception-problems/
If none of the above suggestions work, look at this link.
iPad Wi-Fi Problems: Comprehensive List of Fixes
http://appletoolbox.com/2010/04/ipad-wi-fi-problems-comprehensive-list-of-fixes/
Fix iPad Wifi Connection and Signal Issues http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uwWtIG5jUxE
Fix Slow WiFi Issue https://discussions.apple.com/thread/2398063?start=60&tstart=0
Unable to Connect After iOS Update - saw this solution on another post.
https://discussions.apple.com/thread/4010130
Note - When troubleshooting wifi connection problems, don't hold your iPad by hand. There have been a few reports that holding the iPad by hand, seems to attenuate the wifi signal.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
If any of the above solutions work, please post back what solved your problem. It will help others with the same problem.
 Cheers, Tom

SSL - 128 bit encryption instead of 40 bit?

Hi,
I setup my Tomcat 4.0.3 server to use SSL as directed in a book on servlets that I bought from sun press. Everything works fine, the server starts with SSL support and you can access it with https:, download the cert, etc. I downloaded jsse 1.0.2 jar files and put them into my /jre/lib/ext/ dir as directed and created the keystore for the key with:
keytool -genkey -alias tomcat -keyalg RSA -validity 730
also directed by the book.
My problem is that the keys generated are using 40 bit encryption instead of strong 128. I want to make the site as secure as possible and I'm wondering how to do that. I followed the directions exactly, downloaded the version of jsse for us/canada and yet my certs still say that they were encrypted with 40 bit not 128 bit encryption.
Mike

My problem is that the keys generated are using 40 bit
encryption instead of 128. What client do you use to connect to Tomcat?
If the client does not support 128 bit keys for RC4, the browser
and SSL 3.0 may negotiate a weaker session encryption key,
in your case 40 bit.
I don't use Tomcat, but with my web server you can configure
the SSL protocol versions it accepts, and the ciphers it accepts;
ie I can switch off everything other than RC4-128. -- Can the same
thing be done in Tomcat, and how can it be done?

Problem with tpcall and tpgetrply functions

Hi,
I have a problem with tpcall() and tpgetrply() functions.
In this example (invoke tpcall()):
FBFR32 *buf;
FLDLEN32 buflen;
buf = a_buffer.getBuffer(); /* getBuffer() returns FBFR32* */
buflen = a_buffer.getLongitud();
/* at this point: buf == a_buffer.getBuffer() */
if (tpcall(a_contenedor.getServname(),
(char*)a_contenedor.getBufferPeticion()->getBuffer(),
a_contenedor.getBufferPeticion()->getLongitud(),
(char**)&buf,
(long*)&buflen,
0) == -1)
if (tperrno != TPESVCFAIL)
LANZAR_EXCEPCION(CADENA_WHAT_SB,
"Error en funcion Execute(), llamada tpcall()",
tpstrerror(tperrno))
/* at this point: buf != a_buffer.getBuffer() */
tpcall() function change the memory address of buf. What is the problem? Is wrong my code? Is a problem with tuxedo version?
My tuxedo version is:
tmadmin -vINFO: BEA Tuxedo, Version 8.0, 32-bit, Patch Level 306
INFO: Serial #: 650522264137-773290431251, Expiration NONE, Maxusers 150
INFO: Licensed to: Telefonica Moviles Espa?a, S.A.
INFO: 56-bit Encryption Package
Thanks,
ANTONIO.

There's nothing wrong with your code or tuxedo. tpcall (and tpgetrply) can change the address of the return buffer if it needs to allocate more memory to hold the data. This is the reason why you pass a pointer to the buffer as the output buffer parameter to tpcall and tpreturn. Everything is working as expected.

Problems with IE and 128-bit encryption

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for