Problems with planning scenarios

Dear all
I've a huge problem with the scheduling of a project. I hope I can explain it properly.
I've created a project with some networks in it. The planning scenario is free scheduling and strict bottom up. I'm using the backward scheduling.
Some of the networks, which are connected with the "Main" Network now are not scheduled properly. For example I have an acitivity in the "Main" network which is connected with a FS relationship to an activity (this activity has set up a constraint earliest possible) of another network. When I'm carrying out the scheduling this activity is planned much later than the activity in the Main network. In some other similar networks the scheduling is carried out regurarly.
Now, when I'm changing the planning scenario to bottom up, canceling the start date in the network of concern and making a new scheduling of the whole project, the activity is placed in the right period. When I'm changing back the planning scenario and rescheduling the project once more, the activity is again postponed, even further in the future than before.
is somebody out there who is able to help me?
many thanks

Hello
is nobody out there who could help?
Best

Similar Messages

Problem with MTO scenario-urgent

hi everyone,
our client is using MTO process, where they will exchange halb materials for the fert level production order. i.e according to MTO sales order will trigger procurement seperately at all levels of bom( as sales order stock). what is happening at the client side is they are converting plnd orders to production orders generated in the stock requirement list for HALBS, as thier wish they want to use these randomly for fert production,
costs differences are arising.....
so kindly suggest a solution
thanks
madhu

Hi Madhu,
Your requirement is simple. If my understanding is right in your scenario you have a FERT (A) which is MTO and the assemblies/components (B) used for manufacturing it is a stock item or MTS.
For component A you have to define in material master MRP view 3 with planning strategy - 20 and in MRP4 maintain "1" for Individual and Collective requirement indicator.
For component B you have to define in material master MRP view 3 with a suitable planning strategy -(Not= 20) and in MRP4 maintain "2" for Individual and Collective requirement indicator.
This would resolve the problem. Reward your points,
thank you,
Regards,
Prasobh

Problem with IDoc scenario - IDocs do not aarive to XI

Hi guys!
I have a problem with IDoc->XI->File scenario. Colleagues send IDocs from R/3 and they are not in the XI. In R/3 they look like if they were correctly sent, however, I can not see them in sxmb monitor. BUT, when they send them again explicitly from R/3 (t-code WE19), they arrive...
REALLY strange...
Any suggestions?
IDX2 metadata loaded.. I think, all needed settings are done.
Question - do I need to set up LS in XI ABAP part?
Thanx, Olian!
P.

Hi Olian ,
just check if u have followed all the following steps
SAP XI
1) RFC Destination (SM59)
a) Choose create.
b) Specify the name of the RFC destination
c) Select connection type as 3 and save
d) In the technical settings tab enter the details SAP SID/URL and system number#.
e) Enter the Gateway host as same details above SID/URL.
f) Gateway service is 3300+system number#.
g) In the Logon /Security tab, enter the client user & Password details of Destination system.
h) Test the connection and remote logon.
2) Create Port (IDX1)
a) Select create new button
b) Enter the port name as SAP+SID (The starting char should be SAP)
c) Enter the destination client.
d) Enter the RFC Destination created in SAP R/3 towards other system.
e) Save
3) Load Meta Data for IDOC (IDX2) a) Create new
b) IDOC Message Type
c) Enter port created in IDX1.
SAP R/3
1) RFC Destination (SM59)
a) Choose create.
b) Specify the name of the RFC destination
c) Select connection type as 3 and save
d) In the technical settings tab enter the details SAP SID/URL and system number#.
e) Enter the Gateway host as same details above SID/URL.
f) Gateway service is 3300+system number#.
g) In the Logon /Security tab, enter the client user & Password details of Destination system.
h) Test the connection and remote logon.
2) Create Port (We21)
a) First Select Transactional RFC and then click create button
b) Enter the destination port name as SAP+SID (The starting char should be SAP)
c) Enter the destination client.
d) Enter the RFC Destination created in SAP R/3 towards other system.
e) Save
3) Create Partner Profile (WE20)
a) Create New
b) Create the Partner no. name as same the logical system name of the destination system.
c) Select Partner type LS
d) Enter details for Type: US/USER, Agent, and Lang.
e) Click on the + button to select the message type.
f) Select Partner no. and LS which ever create above.
g) Select Message type
h) Select Process code related to the Message type.
I) save.
In SLD System Landscape Directory
TS for R/3 (Logical system):-Assign the client name created in R/3 as Logical system Name.
Ts for Third Party (Logical system):-
BS for SAP R/3 (Logical system):- Assign the client name created in R/3 as Logical system Name.
BS for Third Party (Logical system):-Enter the XI logical system name.
In Transaction SALE
Define and Assign the logical system name
Regards,
AshwinM

Problems with Plan Change - Needs Immediate Result

Hello,
I have been a long time Verizon Wireless customer. I have two lines, one of which was assigned to a tablet with a 1gb plan. I maintained this line for the upgrade since my other line has unlimited data. I recently upgraded to the Note 3, and in the process was told that I'd have to establish a new line to accomplish the upgrade. The representative, from Costco, let me know that it shouldn't be a problem transferring the same plan to the newly established line and not to worry about anything going wrong. That night I called Verizon for the first time and worked with a customer service representative who ended up making the problem worse by canceling the tablet line before transferringthe device to the new line. This caused a problem with my sim card, and I have to request a new one because my old was was constantly showing an "aging" status. Even a few days later. The first night consisted of two phone calls to Verizon because the rep mentioned above ended up disconnecting me trying to get over to tech support. The second rep was much more helpful, but wasn't able to do anything and let me know I'd have to work with tech support, but should wait until the next day to allow the sim to "age."
The next day was the 4th of July, so I called back the next day and went through a similar process, spent about 30 minutes with one rep, only to be told my sim was still "ageing" and to talk to tech support. Every time I was connected with tech support it was a minimum 30 minute wait, just to be told that there was nothing they could do, again, and they sent me a new sim card. When i received that sim, at which point it was the following week, I called back and activated my tablet successfully. Hung the phone up and thought all was well, until I saw my balance due the next day. It was nearly double what I usually pay. The representative never informed me that it would default to a prorated amount based on that payment, of 4gb. None of which I need. I called back, again, and was told that I wasn't able to use the old plan I had since it didn't exist anymore. This time the representative was very pleasant, and let me know she'd put a request in to see if the old plan would be possible, given my situation. I was alright with that, and this was the first time I wasn't frustrated after hanging up the phone.
She called me back yesterday letting me know that Verizon isn't willing to allow me to use my old plan, and that there is a new plan options, that is 10 dollars a month. Honestly that was all right, so I called in today to change it to that plan and have it backdated to the date of upgrade to fix my billing issue. During the process of looking up my information, the representative I spoke with today disconnected me. Over the last week and a half I have spent nearly 3-4 hours on the phone with Verizon just trying to fix this issue that was not anything I could have controlled.
The rep at Costco told me I'd have no issues transferring my lien to the new line we opened that day, and the first individual I spoke with on the phone canceled the line too early and further delayed the process by requiring me to request a new SIM card for the tablet. After being disconnected this time, I'm extremely frustrated with the entire situation and Verizon in general. I've been a customer of Verizon for nearly ten years, and for the fist time I am considering moving to another carrier seeing. In that ten year period, I have probably called into customer service less than 5 times. And in the last week and a half I have made more calls, and spent far more time on the phone than every before.
The bottom line is, I need to have the plan changed on my tablet line to something comparable to what I had previously, which was a 20 dollar, 1gb plan with the 10 dollar tablet fee. I need this taken care of ASAP and I need to know it's being done correctly. If Verizon is going to partner with companies like Costco to provide phones to members, and increase their customer base, than these reps need to be better equipped to handle the upgrade process. And it seems that the call centers I have spoken with are a 50/50 shot in terms of reaching someone who is able to do their job effectively and in a timely fashion.
I hope to be contacted with a resolution by today or I will be returning the phone, and looking elsewhere for my wireless needs.
Thank you.
Josh

There is an "undocumented" parameter you need to include in your
page. It MUST be a hidden field value called "p_action". The
form hidden value is either "OK" or "CANCEL" (case sensitive).
Thus, when the form is submitted, this parameter states to
commit the changes. Useful if you have a "Save" button and
a "Cancel" button.

Problems with planning function in Web Application Designer in 2004s

Hi All,
I have a problem in WAD 2004s with planning function. I created a web template that includes a query. It runs on the enterprise portal, and I can edit this query. The problem is: I don't know how to save this edited query, because when I use the button with function save, the new value doesn't appear in the relevant info cube.
Anybody can help me how to save the new values to the info cube?
Thanks in advance
Dezso Toth

I don't know if you ever resolved this, but you may just ned to change a setting on your query properties. When data is entered into planning layouts and saved, that data is put into a "yellow" request in the underlying infocube.
Until the necessary volume of data is posted which causes this to change to "green", it remains yellow. Note that this request could also be changed to green several ways. i.e. manually, by flipping the "real-time infocube behavior" switch, etc.
Anyway, as long as it "yellow" your query, by default will not consider it, unless you change it's properties to tell it to consider "yellow" requests. This can be done via RSRT and pressing the "properties" button. Choose request status "2" and your problem should be solved

Using Iphone5 with bluetooth in a car: problems with plans and music

Hi all,
i use my iphone5 in my car (recent one, bought it 2 years ago) with bluetooth connection.
The problem is that when i want to use "Plans" App, if i want to hear the indications in the car's loudpeakers, the iphone start music itself. It starts the latest thing listen on "Music" app or Deezer.
So you have the indications of Plans voice, and the music at the same time. Hard to be concentrate on the road you have to follow...
There's also the same problem with he music without using "Plans" app: if i'm listening to a CD or the USB key in my car, i switch the audio source to the iphone and it starts music alone.
I think that putting a real "stop" button in all music app ( "Music", "Deezer" etc) instead of just the "on hold" button could maybe forced the phone to not play anything and just hear the Plans app alone.
The fact to have no stop button lead to have always some music on hold.
Does anybody notice the same problems using iphone in his car?
Thanks for advices and thanks to Apple to fix these problems.

Nobody have notice this problem or have a tip for that?

'ipod has not found a sensor' - could it be a problem with plane?

I have just received a nike+ ipod sport kit, which I bought on ebay. Receiver is probably ok because the application works correcty. But when I am asked to walk around to locate sensor, it doesn't find anything, writting a message 'ipod has not found a sensor'. I'm sure that it's not in a sleeping mode.
I was thinking if there could be a problem with delivery. Like some problem during flight or some mechanical damage.
Could anyone help please?

The same thing happened to me with a brand-new one! I wonder if someone knows what to do? I tried to press the sensor button to put it to wake - no change. Advantage on you I can go to the store and get it exchanged if required - I'll keep you informed.

Problems with planning function in sneak preview J2EE

Hi all,
I have a 2 systems environment with sneak preview J2EE and ABAP on my notebook. I configured SLD, JCo and in the 2004s with ta SPRO the planning function.
I can connect with ta RSPLAN to the J2EE server, but I get the error message:
com.sap.tc.webdynpro.services.exceptions.WDRuntimeException: no jcoMetadata found for RFC function 'RSPLSDOKU_LINK_GET'! Please verify, that your model is consistent with the ABAP backend: 'NSP'.
The testing of the JCo connections is positiv, i.e. there is a connection between the J2EE and the ABAP system already defined. Is tehre anything missing?
any help appreciated

I don't know if you ever resolved this, but you may just ned to change a setting on your query properties. When data is entered into planning layouts and saved, that data is put into a "yellow" request in the underlying infocube.
Until the necessary volume of data is posted which causes this to change to "green", it remains yellow. Note that this request could also be changed to green several ways. i.e. manually, by flipping the "real-time infocube behavior" switch, etc.
Anyway, as long as it "yellow" your query, by default will not consider it, unless you change it's properties to tell it to consider "yellow" requests. This can be done via RSRT and pressing the "properties" button. Choose request status "2" and your problem should be solved

Problem with Integration Scenario involving BPM

Hello All
I've created simple async Integration Scenario.
Sender is SOAP, then message is being processed by BPM Integration Process (some simple mapping inside - for now it is just proof of concept - later on it will split messages etc.) . Receiver is JDBC adapter.
Now, when I test Sender-> BPM (using Test Configuration tool ) - works fine, no errors.
BPM -> Receiver - as well.
But when I'm trying to test Sender -> Receiver it fails (so it does when I call Sender webservice from external tool).
Error is:
Receiver Agreement
<Trace level="1" type="B">CL_XMS_PLSRV_OUTBINDING-ENTER_PLSRV</Trace>
<Trace level="2" type="T">O U T B O U N D - B I N D I N G </Trace>
<Trace level="2" type="T"> Cache Content is up to date </Trace>
<Trace level="2" type="T">determine OUTBOUND BINDING for: </Trace>
<Trace level="2" type="T">-SENDER </Trace>
<Trace level="2" type="T">-RECEIVER </Trace>
<Trace level="2" type="T">http://company.com/xi/sn.DataOut </Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">error with outbound binding. </Trace> <Trace level="1" type="T">
No standard agreement found for , SENDER, RECEIVER, http://company.com/xi/sn, DataOutt </Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="E">CL_XMS_PLSRV_OUTBINDING-ENTER_PLSRV</Trace>
In fact there is no Receiver Agreement for this pair of sender-receiver, but in scenario those are connected via BPM.
What am I missing in configuration to force PI to send messages correctly?
TIA
Regards
Maciej

Hi Maciej,
If you are trying to test it from the RWB -> Component Monitring-> Integration Engine-> Test Message option, then you should not be giving the receiver system and interface details.
Just specify the details of the sender system, interface name and namespace.
Give the user id and pwd details.
Give the Quality of service as "Exactly Once".
Paste the payload and click on SEND button. (DO NOT GIVE THE RECEIVER SYSTEM details).
It will work.
Thanks and Regards,
ravi Kanth Talagana

Problem with HTTP Scenario....

Hello ,
While working with the (http >BPM> RFC & FILE ) scenario ,
I am getting following error...
<b>
And while using the http Client I posted the test xml ...But I am unable to see it in the SXI_MONITOR...</b>
And using RWB --> Componet Monitoring --> Integration Engine --> Test Message I triggered the Test XML
then its going to sxi_monitor but giving error...
<b>
"The process does not support the given synchronous interface or does not support synchronous messages"
</b>
what should I do....
Please help me in this regard...

Satya ,
Is it a syncronous interface ? if it is syncronous interface if you want to see that in logs then you have to enable Logging for syncronous in SXMB_ADM .
Is it enabled ?
Are you able to post the HTTP request using HTTP client ?
And using RWB --> Componet Monitoring --> Integration Engine --> Test Message I triggered the Test XML
then its going to sxi_monitor but giving error...
The process does not support the given synchronous interface or does not support synchronous messages"
In the above mentioned error statement it is clearly stating that this stand alone test interface tool in RWB not support this scenario.
Please let me know if you need any further assistance .
Regards,
Kishore

Problem with Synchronous Scenario

Hello Experts,
Right now i am working on a synchronous scenario RFC <-> 3rd party.
RFC, with other data, passing one table to XI and 3rd party, but in response RFC will require the same table back.
Now here in XI we are not storing synchronous messages in success case. So can anyone tell me that if i want that table in reply also, what should i do?
I was thinking of option that while i communicate with 3rd party, we will create file also in which i will store that table data with the message Id, and while i will get reply back from 3rd party i will read this data from the file and then will pass it back to RFC.
But m not sure that in response how i will read that file? and will i be able to delete that file or not?
Please reply me as soon as possible as i have to give this option to my client.
Hope the question is clear.
Thanks and Regards,
Hetal

Hey,
you can do this in a couple of ways.
Fisrt, you can create a file as already mentioned and access the file from your server.
second, you can create an internal table and access it via hash map.
for both the solutions you need to create a udf.
regards,
Milan.

Problem with RNIF Scenario

Hi ,
In a B2B scenario we have RNIF as receiver ans R/3 as sender.
Is it possible to configure this scenario without BPM ? If yes ...
We have configured an IDOC to RNIF scenario with out using BPM. When the idoc is sent from the sender system to XI , XI is not able to determine the receiver system. WE have configured the party for this and it is not able to determine the receiver .
Please provide suggestions
Thanks in advance,
Hemanthika.

Hi,
>>Is it possible to configure this scenario without BPM ? If yes ...
Yes, Check this document : http://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/index?rid=/library/uuid/204e2606-b925-2c10-a2aa-8a43c62523e0&overridelayout=true
>>We have configured an IDOC to RNIF scenario with out using BPM. When the idoc is sent from the sender system to XI , XI is not able to determine the receiver system.
What error are you getting? Are you using party in sender IDoc side too.. I recommend reading the above article.
Regards
Suraj

MF50 problem with planned order

Hello
We use MF50 to production planning and convert quantities in production order.
But if we doing any mistake and, without save, we need to doing "undo" how can we doing this?
Thanks

JN,
In MF50 when you are manually entering quantity, system creates a simulated planned order and when you use the Quantity Change>Convert Quantities>In production order system just has this detail in the structure for updating the database with these details.
Till the time you save in MF50 transaction this planned order or production order is not updated in system database, so if you dont want the production order to get created as you made some mistake just comeout of MF50 transaction without saving.
Regards,
Prasobh

Problems with planning code how can I do this??

I wonder if someone could help me I have a slight problem.. basically i'm writing a threaded application that needs to update jeopardy codes on all open tasks on an order if there is a jeopardy code on one of the tasks. As users only put the code on one task when they should put it on all but to make the users life easier i need to write an app to do it for them.
My problem is that there could be 5 tasks on one order and there could be 4 jeopardy codes on one of the tasks, all of these need to appear on all tasks, on another task there could be 2 jeopardy codes which then need to appear on all other tasks if one is closed then they all need to be closed on the basis that if the date closed is newer than the date opened then close all J codes if its older then create all J codes on corresponding tasks. I have written a database lookup to fetch the doc no, task nos, jep codes against each task, closed and modify dates. I have created an order object with all this info in. Other than iterating over order object to get doc number then to get list of tasks names then to get list of jeopardy codes then iterate over again to update each jeopardy code on each open task how else can I do this as this seems really messy to me... (I am updating by back end database not via api)
Sorry if this is confusing any help will be most appreciated

As users only put the code on one task when they
y should put it on all but to make the users life
easier i need to write an app to do it for them.
My problem is that there could be 5 tasks on one
order and there could be 4 jeopardy codes on one of
the 5 tasks, each jeopardy code needs to appear on
each tasks, on another task there could be 2 jeopardy
codes which then need to appear on all other tasks as
well.This sounds to me very much like the jeopardy code is (at least in practice) an attribute of the order and not an attribute of the task. I would suggest redesigning your data model to make this the case. Then the application that allowed the users to put a jeopardy code on a task would actually put it on the order containing the task.
If one is closed then they all need to be closed on
the basis that if the date closed is newer than the
date opened then close all J codes if its older then
create all J codes on corresponding tasks.
I have written a database lookup to fetch the doc no,
task nos, jep codes against each task, closed and
modify dates. I have created an order object with all
this info in.Or if redesigning your database isn't a palatable option (this is quite likely in most organizations) then you could modify your database lookup and object creation so that they treated the jeopardy codes for an order's tasks as if they were jeopardy codes for the order.

PO creation problem with classic scenario

Hi All,
We are in SRM 7.0 nad have mapped extended classic scenario. Now we want to map the Classic scenario only for a specific company code. So, my question is can we map the classic scenario on company code specific.
I tried maintianing the document type & number ranges in R/3. Maintained the number ranges & transaction type in SRM.
Also implemented BADI BBP_EXTLOCALPO_BADI.
But after creating the SC the status is "Approved" but no PO getting created in ECC. On observing RZ20 there is an system error for the number ranges.
Please let me know if I am missing some steps.
Thanks in advance.
Regards,
Abey.

HI,
Make sure the PO number range in ERP is same in SRM. Also have the external checkbox checked for PO number range in ERP.
Also have the same transaction type in SRM and ERP. Where the ERP transaction type should have external number range as the above mentioned profile.
Regards
Sam

Problems with planning scenarios

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for