Problems with Transport Management System

Hi All,
i seem to be having some issues with my Transport Management System, we have a two system landscape DEV & PRD, the operating system is windows 2003 server. i am trying to access the usr/sap/trans on the transport host (DEV) from the PRD system, i have put patches on the DEV server, but i can't access these patches from the PRD server. I have also tried to release a test transport, but the queues are not being updated. the systems are in the same Domain and the same transport group. on the PRD server i have specified the following value for the DIR_TRANS =
DEVSERVER\sapmnt\trans. i have checked the files and they are shared, what could be the cause of this?

Can you please check the access of global TRANS directory from your PRD server. Login to your PRD server, goto transaction STMS --> Overview --> Systems. Select your developement system and goto SAP System --> Check --> Transport Directory. If it can access the global directory the tick marks will come otherwise there is some problem with the directory access.
Regards,
Abhishek Jain

Similar Messages

Transport Management System with Solution Manager

Dear all,
Do you know the function transport management system(TMS) with solution manager, I already search in SAP document but not found this function.
Do you know how to config solution manager for TMS and documents related with this function please guide for me!
Thanks all very much !

Hi,
Check this link.
https://websmp103.sap-ag.de/~sapdownload/011000358700000508502008E/ChangeRequestManagement.pdf
Hope this answers your questions.
Feel free to revert back.
-=-Ragu

System RQ1 is unknown in the Transport Management System

<b>Hi
Please assist I am getting this screen dumbs on st22 about my TMS running this function "TMS_CI_CHECK_ACCESSTOKEN". the problem is that my RP2 is checking RQ1 which is no longer on my systems land it is now replaced by RQ2.
below is the error and suggested procedure but it's not working.
Please provide any suggestions.
</b>
Diagnosis
An error occurred in the TMS communication layer.
System: RP2.DOMAIN_RD2(000)
Function: TMS_CI_CHECK_ACCESSTOKEN
Error: UNKNOWN_SYSTEM (RQ1)
System Response
The function terminates.
Procedure
Log this system on to the Transport Management System.
If this error occurs in the function TMS_CI_CHECK_ACCESSTOKEN, then the TMS configuration was deleted in the R/3 System RP2.DOMAIN_RD2(000).

So, just in case someone need more feedback, the help on error message is::
System XYZ is unknown in the system landscape
Message no. AI_SOLAR11080
Procedure
Create system XYZ in the System Landscape transaction .
- the system is created in SMSY.
Generate RFC destinations from the local system into the system XYZ in the Clients tab in the transaction Setup System Landscapes.
- RFC destinations generated (and tested successfuly) but not in SMSY_SETUP. This tx is named "System Landscape Maint. Settings" in SAP Easy Access, but once entered, it has a "Setup System Landscapes - SAP Solution Manager" title. However, this tx is dedicated to define an Automatic Data Transfer type:
TMS/ RFC (this one is my case), or
SLD
So, the RFC's are generated in SMSY also, well - some of them. I used SM59 and SMT1 and SMT2 to finish it propertly.
Alternatively, you can assign an existing system to the logical components, in the System Landscape/Systems tab in the Project Administration.
+- The (existing) system is assigned to the logical components, it can be seen on "System Lanscape - System" tab in SOLAR_PROJECT_ADMIN
However, when I try the "System Lanscape Check" button in the same transaction, I get this very message as well...+
You can suppress this message by putting the system in the exception table in the Plug-In List, but you should only do so in exceptional circumstances.
I am not quite sure how this could be a solution to my problem. I suppose it would just suppress the message, and not solve the problem...
Now, what confuses me is that I have done it once with no problem with other system in this very project, and now I can't find a solution...
Any help is highly apreciated.
Thank you in advance,
Nenad

Transport Management System Configuration

Hi,
I have a question here, on Transport Management System.
We have new 64 bit boxes. I first migrated our dev SCM 4.0 box from 32 bit to 64 bit, it asked for being a Domain Controller. Configured it as a Domain Controller, and continued with the upgrade and completed the upgrade.
Now, I am going to the second box (QAS). I have performed the migration from 32 bit to 64 bit. Now, when I login to this box, in my understanding, TMS should offer to make this system part of the already existing domain right? It doesn't happen that way. It is forming itself again as a domain controller. After some changes and update configurations on both the boxes, the QAS box now says, "Waiting to be added into the domain by the domain controller" something similar to this. But, when I go and login to the domain controller (DEV), it doesn't show anything there.
In the QAS system when I go to the System Overview, I see both the systems but, they both show under the two different transport groups. I am totally confused here. Am I doing something wrong here? The only problem I see here is, the domain controller (DEV) is on SCM 5.0 as it is already upgraded from SCM 4.0 but the QAS is still in SCM 4.0 and waiting to be upgraded. Do you think this could be a potential problem? If so, what is the solution to continue with the upgrade because, I am sure the upgrade won't work without the Transport Management System configured properly.
Please help.
Thank you.

Hi Gus,
Thank you for the prompt response. Thank you.
There are couple of things to be considered before following your suggestion.
1. Our QAS box is in Kernel 6.40 (32 bit) and my DEV (upgraded) is in Kernel 7.00 (64 bit). In this kind of heterogeneous environment, I am sure the R3trans versions should be different. Is it possible to configure the transport management using the shared transport directory (Transport Group)?
2. Now, when I login to the QAS box, as I said in my previous message, I see two entries. One it should the APD (Domain Controller) with a different transport group. And I see the APQ in a different transport group. The problem here is, I cannot edit or delete any of the entries in the APQ - STMS because, it keeps saying all changes could be made only in the domain controller. A point to be noted here is, even though it shows two different transport group, it points to the same transport domain 'DOMAIN_APD'. Another thing to be noted here is when I look at the domain controller (APD), I don't see an entry for APQ or any awaiting approval requests.
Kindly suggest what needs to be done here.
Thank you.

ECC integration with Document Management System

Hi,
Can anybody provide step by step approach for connecting ECC with Document management system(product of EMC).
Also would appreciate if somebody clarifies the folllowing queries
1) Do we really need Archivelink if we just want to store documents and access documents from DMS.
2) What are the configurations required at DMS side and what are the configurations required at SAP ECC.
Any solution to my problem will be much appreciated.
Thanks & Regards
Prabhat

If you Google 'Flash SCORM' you should find a good deal of
info.
Dave -
Head Developer
http://www.blurredistinction.com
Adobe Community Expert
http://www.adobe.com/communities/experts/

Transport management system in ABAP

Hello Abappers,
Could you please provide me with the guided procedure of how the transport management system in ABAP works?
Please explain it in detail.
Points will be rewarded for relevant answers.
Regards,
Mansi.

Hi,
Try these links...
http://help.sap.com/printdocu/core/Print46c/en/data/pdf/BCCTSTMS/BCCTSTMS.pdf
http://www.bayerbbs.de/fileadmin/user_upload/bbs_internet/pdf/brochures/Einkauf/TM3%20Broschre_en.pdf
Do Reward points if useful....
Regards
AK

STMS problem with transport import

Hello all
I had a problem with transports in STMS.
Log history of imported transport didn't show any error and simophore is green.
But in target system data element wasn't presented.
When i import this transport again - it's all ok.
It happened twice. And i didn't find any solutions yet.((
Did anyone have the same problem???

Start import LIMUMETH/NPQ/CL_RESERVATION           SPLIT_RESERV ...
0 entries from SMODILOG (CLAS/NPQ/CL_RESERVATION                     METH/NPQ/CL_RESERVATION           SPLIT_RESERVATION
0 entries from SMODISRC (CVCLAS/NPQ/CL_RESERVATION                     METH/NPQ/CL_RESERVATION           SPLIT_RESERVATION
0 entries from SMODISRC (CUCLAS/NPQ/CL_RESERVATION                     METH/NPQ/CL_RESERVATION           SPLIT_RESERVATION
0 entries from SMODISRC (PRCLAS/NPQ/CL_RESERVATION                     METH/NPQ/CL_RESERVATION           SPLIT_RESERVATION
0 entries from SMODISRC (SVCLAS/NPQ/CL_RESERVATION                     METH/NPQ/CL_RESERVATION           SPLIT_RESERVATION
0 entries from SMODISRC (CICLAS/NPQ/CL_RESERVATION                     METH/NPQ/CL_RESERVATION           SPLIT_RESERVATION
method SPLIT_RESERVATION                                             include /NPQ/CL_RESERVATION===========CM01Z      will be impor
REPOS /NPQ/CL_RESERVATION===========CM01M      A replaced.
End of import LIMUMETH/NPQ/CL_RESERVATION           SPLIT_RESERV
E071-LOCKFLAGs 000016 - 000016 updated ('2', 1 entries).
E071C entries 000016 - 000016 deleted (1 entries).
report /NPQ/CL_RESERVATION===========CM01M      (L) synchronized.
report /NPQ/CL_RESERVATION===========CP         (L) synchronized.
169836 5330910
LIMUTABD/NPQ/LOCATION_HIERARCHY_QRY was not imported in this step
LIMUTABD/NPQ/RESERV_ROOM_SERVICE_STR was not imported in this step
LIMUTABD/NPQ/RES_SERVICE was not imported in this step
LIMUTABD/NPQ/RES_SERVICE_DETAILS was not imported in this step
Start import LIMUWAPP/NPQ/FM                       SERVICE/CREA ...
Start import LIMUWAPP/NPQ/FM                       SERVICE/CREA ...
Start import LIMUWAPP/NPQ/FM                       SERVICE/GETS ...
Start import LIMUWAPP/NPQ/FM_NEW_DESIGN            SERVICE/CREA ...
Start import LIMUWAPP/NPQ/FM_NEW_DESIGN            SERVICE/GETS ...
0 entries from SMODILOG (WAPA/NPQ/FM_NEW_DESIGN                      WAPP/NPQ/FM_NEW_DESIGN            SERVICE/GETSRVPOINTLOCATIO
0 entries from SMODISRC (CVWAPA/NPQ/FM_NEW_DESIGN                      WAPP/NPQ/FM_NEW_DESIGN            SERVICE/GETSRVPOINTLOCAT
0 entries from SMODISRC (CUWAPA/NPQ/FM_NEW_DESIGN                      WAPP/NPQ/FM_NEW_DESIGN            SERVICE/GETSRVPOINTLOCAT
0 entries from SMODISRC (PRWAPA/NPQ/FM_NEW_DESIGN                      WAPP/NPQ/FM_NEW_DESIGN            SERVICE/GETSRVPOINTLOCAT
0 entries from SMODISRC (SVWAPA/NPQ/FM_NEW_DESIGN                      WAPP/NPQ/FM_NEW_DESIGN            SERVICE/GETSRVPOINTLOCAT
0 entries from SMODISRC (CIWAPA/NPQ/FM_NEW_DESIGN                      WAPP/NPQ/FM_NEW_DESIGN            SERVICE/GETSRVPOINTLOCAT
0 d /   0 i /   2 u /   1 = 33% ucf O2PAGCON
3 entries for O2PAGCON imported (TR/NPQ/FM_NEW_DESIGN            SERVICE/GETSRVPOINTLOCATIONHIERARCHY
0 d /   0 i /   1 u /   0 =   0% ucf O2PAGDIR
1 entry for O2PAGDIR imported (/NPQ/FM_NEW_DESIGN            SERVICE/GETSRVPOINTLOCATIONHIERARCHY
0 d /   0 i /   0 u /   4 = 100% ucf O2PAGDIRT
4 entries for O2PAGDIRT imported (/NPQ/FM_NEW_DESIGN            SERVICE/GETSRVPOINTLOCATIONHIERARCHY
0 d /   0 i /   0 u /   1 = 100% ucf O2PAGEVH
1 entry for O2PAGEVH imported (/NPQ/FM_NEW_DESIGN            SERVICE/GETSRVPOINTLOCATIONHIERARCHY
0 entries from O2PAGPAR (/NPQ/FM_NEW_DESIGN            SERVICE/GETSRVPOINTLOCATIONHIERARCHY                                  %) d
0 entries from O2PAGPAR (/NPQ/FM_NEW_DESIGN            SERVICE/GETSRVPOINTLOCATIONHIERARCHY                                  %) d
0 entries from O2PAGPART (/NPQ/FM_NEW_DESIGN            SERVICE/GETSRVPOINTLOCATIONHIERARCHY                                  %)
0 entries from O2PAGPART (/NPQ/FM_NEW_DESIGN            SERVICE/GETSRVPOINTLOCATIONHIERARCHY                                  %)
0 entries from SOTR_USE (LIMUWAPP/NPQ/FM#_NEW#_DESIGN            SERVICE/GETSRVPOINTLOCATIONHIERARCHY
0 entries from SOTR_USE (LIMUWAPP/NPQ/FM#_NEW#_DESIGN            SERVICE/GETSRVPOINTLOCATIONHIERARCHY
0 entries from SOTR_USEU (LIMUWAPP/NPQ/FM#_NEW#_DESIGN            SERVICE/GETSRVPOINTLOCATIONHIERARCHY
0 entries from SOTR_USEU (LIMUWAPP/NPQ/FM#_NEW#_DESIGN            SERVICE/GETSRVPOINTLOCATIONHIERARCHY
End of import LIMUWAPP/NPQ/FM_NEW_DESIGN            SERVICE/GETS
R3TRDTEL/NPQ/DELIVERY_POINT was not imported in this step
R3TRDTEL/NPQ/SRV_POINT was not imported in this step
E071-LOCKFLAGs 000021 - 000025 updated ('2', 5 entries).
E071C entries 000021 - 000025 deleted (5 entries).
DEVK902177           touched.
table O2PAGDIR (R) synchronized.
1 tables in P-buffer synchronized.
2 tables in R-buffer synchronized.
42832 5373742
158359 bytes read.
Transport overhead 15.3 %.
Data compressed to 5.3 %.
Duration: 14 sec (11311 bytes/sec).
1 0
Summary:
15 REPOS imported.
Totally 15 Objects imported.
Totally 1551 tabentries imported.
5373742 bytes modified in database.
[dev trc     ,00000] Thu Mar 03 18:26:16 2011                                             13410099 13.410099
[dev trc     ,00000] Disconnecting from ALL connections:                                       21 13.410120
[dev trc     ,00000] Disconnecting from connection 0 ...                                       33 13.410153
[dev trc     ,00000] Now I'm disconnected from SAP DB                                        4897 13.415050
[dev trc     ,00000] Disconnected from connection 0                                            63 13.415113
[dev trc     ,00000] statistics db_con_commit (com_total=17, com_tx=17)                        26 13.415139
[dev trc     ,00000] statistics db_con_rollback (roll_total=0, roll_tx=0)                      25 13.415164
Disconnected from database.
End of Transport (0000).
date&time: 03.03.2011 - 18:26:16
Main import
End date and time : 20110303182616
     |   Ended with return code: ===> 0 <===

Change Request Management without Transport Managment System

Hello,
we would like to use the Change Request Management but without using the Transport Managment System (TMS). Means, we do not want that transport request are created automatically, we do not want that it is possible to log on to the satellite systems via the Solution Manager and we do not want to integrate the transport track into the Solution Manager.
What effort do we have to estimate for such a change? Does anybody already use a process like this? We would be grateful for any idea or solution.
Many thanks in advance.
Jenny

Hi Jenny,
you can do this with the following activities in your custom Business Transaction (BT):
- remove un-useful actions from your action list (TA: CRMC_ACTION_CONF)
- remove the action from the actions depending on user status (TA: starting from SPRO)
- unlock the switches from your SMI Project CTS Switches (TA: SOLAR_PROJECT_ADMIN)
The effort, for copying a standard BT and remove the actions and testing it, is about 5 days, if you already know how to customize a ChaRM BT... last but not least if one of the standard flows is what you really need.
Please let me know if you need more details, otherwise please reward the forum points
Regards ,
Giampaolo

Problems with transporting

Hi,
I have a problem with transporting from DEV to PROD. There are no imports in import queue in SMTS.
I can export data from DEV, but there are not displayed in STMS. (Only texts as Language Netweaver 04 SR1 CS).
In TMS alert viewer there are a lot of errors. F.E. READ_DOCU_FAILED, RFC_SYSTEM_FAILURE, TP_REPORTED_ERROR (Transport control program tp ended with error code 0012).
We had no problems with this before but the old transports are not displayed in gueue too.
The RFC connection seems to be ok.
Can anybody help?
Thanks
Radka

Hi,
it seems does not help.
But I found a problem in transport groups.
If i run a check of transport groups. The error message "System DWP cannot read test file written by DWD" is displayed.
"When the system checked the transport groups, it discovered that system DWP cannot read a test file written by system DWD to the transport directory. The return code of the action was 0008"
DWD=DEV
DWP=PROD
Can anybody help? Or does somebody know, where sap creates the test file? Or the name of the test file...
Thanks
RH

Heterogenous Transport Management System

Hi All
Some one can help us with the doubt concerning with the Transport Management System with a Heterogenous Systems. We want to know if it is possible and what we need to do to have the next landscape:
DEVELOP System with IBM Server with AIX 5.3 O.S and Oracle 9.2 DB Server
QUALITY and PRODCUTIVE Systems with SUN Servers with Solaris 9 O.S. and Oracle 9.2 DB Server.
Best Regards
Reynaldo Rebolledo

Hi Reynaldo,
We are planning to go for a similar setup of DEV running on IBM AIX and QAS & Production running on Sun Solaris 10 X64/x86. Is there any specific challenges or bottlenecks that you have faced with this setup? Could you please share your experiences?
Thanks.

I have a problem with Transport the personalization of standard ess compone

I have a problem with Transport the personalization of standard ess component.
My problem is in several components, such as:
portal_content/com.sap.pct/every_user/com.sap.pct.erp.ess.bp_folder/com.sap.pct.erp.ess.roles/
com.sap.pct.erp.ess.employee_self_service/com.sap.pct.erp.ess.employee_self_service/
com.sap.pct.erp.ess.area_personal_information/persinfo_es/com.sap.pct.erp.ess.13.pdata
I have personalized this page (into rol, not directly in the page), with Ctrl+Right button.
Now i transport the rol, from Development to Quality environment, but i don't see the changes in Quality.
My system is NW 7.01 SP7, Can be that the problem?
Any idea to solve this problem?

First please see note 1234273 which details how best to personalize
for all users.
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04s/helpdata/en/42/ed3ce7f8593eebe10000000
a1553f7/frameset.htm
Here you can read:
"If an iView is transported to another portal all these properties are
also transported. This is needed to make sure that role-specific changes
could be transported together with the role. End user personalization
data is NOT transported in this way as end user personalization is only
local to the current portal."
Could you please ensure that personalization was done by an admin user?
I'm afraid that if it was done by an end user, personalization isn´t
transported as it's explained in the documentation provided.
Could you please confirm whether you are using exactly the same language
to access to both systems, development and quality? Maybe you are using
language en(us) in one system and en(gb) in the other one. Please take
into account that personalization is language specific.
From the web dynpro end, the WebDynpro personalization is stored
NOT in the PCD prior to 710 release. And as such it cannot be included
in a portal role transport. This feature is available with NW 7.10 SP2
or later (from webdynpro point stand). The best option is to
go with NW 7.30 as this is the first NetWeaver release with EP since
NW 7.02.

SAP NW 7.4 as java system sync with solution manager system 7.1 issue

Dear all,
I have installed SAP NW 7.4 system SP level is SP5 ,after that i have cheked in service marlket palce Now service market plkace latest SP level SP7.
For manula downlowd( directly from service market place) is difficult for java system and i have started sysnc with solution manager system to download patches through MOPZ.
Below are the activities completed:
1) Through template installed I have rgeisterd the system into Solman SLD.
2) Sync completed succfully exact product version is shwoing in solman SLD
3) after that I have checked in SMSY and LMDB its showing prefectly
4) But in SMSY its shwoing only under technical system,not showing product systems
5) I have assigned in product system in LMDB
Now the issues while selecting the system group and logical componensts I have created one logical componnets -but in that SAP NW 7.4 is not showing and I have assumed SAP NW 7.3 EHP1 after creating my newly create dsystem is not shwoing in drop down.
I ma getting belwo error.
No system found for this product/product instance
Message no. SOLAR_SPROJECT110
Please sugegst how to reslove the error ,and a;lso please let me know is there any way to download latest pathces to dpownload from service market place .
Advance Thanks

Hi,
re-check if the 7.4 system is correctly registered in the solman SLD system.
Re-check LMDB definition for your 7.4 as JAVA system. you have to manually created the Product system. Ensure all the Component and definitions are correct.
Also do a verrification run within the LMDB. This will confirm whether all the information is correctly defined.
Please note - SLD -> LMDB -> SMSY.
So, if the first 2 don't have the correct information, you wont have much joy with smsy.
Rgds
Deepak

'A problem with the cooling system' error message on Satellite A660

Hi all,
Hope I can get some help here. I've had about 5 HP laptops after all of them had problems and faults. I got sick of them and therefore got a refund and bought a high spec A660-1FH.
The A660 has been a great laptop for two days until yesterday when I started getting a warning message saying 'A problem with the cooling system has been detected. Please turn off the computer immediately, and return it for service'.
The cpu fan works fine as you can here it spinning and the temperature of the i5-460m processor is around 40 degrees for both cores - which seems normal to me. I've noted that it happens only when running on battery and if you switch from eco utility to power saver mode. Its fine when running on the 'balanced' power setting. The fan is louder before when this message appears.
As its under 28 days my retailer swapped it for a brand new one straight away. Got the new one home, and the same message appears again. Has anyone else experienced this. As two laptops have had this, I'm wondering if this is normal for the A660 series laptop or if there is really a hardware issue?!
I have tried to upgrade eco utility and the bios of the laptop but both are the latest versions. Can anyone help or share if they experience a similar issue with their laptop?
Thanks

In front of me I have Satellite A660-13Q (PSAW3E) and I have it about 6 weeks now. It runs almost 10 hours daily and until now I didnt notice such message or anything else that can be suspect for hardware functionality.
I really dont know why this happen on your notebook and dont think there is anything you can do about it.
I would exchange it again. What you can also try is to contact nearest Toshiba service. Make a call, explain the situation and ask if they can help you with this.

A problem with the cooling system has been detected

I bought a new computer not to long ago, I've had it for almost a month now. It runs fine, and I've had no problems until not too long ago. I was playing a game, and I got a random error message: "A problem with the cooling system has been detected. Please turn off the computer immdiately, and return it for service." I don't understand how or why this came up, and I don't have any money to return it for any type of repairs. After I got this message, I left my computer off for about an hour. All seems well so far. Any suggestions?

What laptop do you have?
- Peter

Problem with the EFI system partition's file system.

I installed latest yosemite 10.10.2 update - did a verify disk on “WDC WD1001FALS-403AA0 Media” (internal HD on my iMac 21.5-inch, Mid 2011) and got
Problems were found with the partition map which might prevent booting
Error: The partition map needs to be repaired because there’s a problem with the EFI system partition’s file system.
However a verify disk on the volume partition gets a clean bill of health!
I haven't done a 'repair disk' yet. Thought I'd check if anybody else has same message first.
Cheers

I had issues where my MacPro 8-core would not boot after the 10.7.4 upgrade, but my MacBook Air 13" 2011 upgrade worked just fine.
I had to restore my MacPro HD from my TimeMachine back up. Apparently, the Softraid raid drivers that I use on my MacPro are not compatible yet with 10.7.4. See here for more info:
http://macperformanceguide.com/blog/2012/20120511_1-MacOSX-SoftRAID.html
I contacted Softraid and they are already aware of the issues and are working with Apple for a fix.
Cheers.
Bud

Problems with Transport Management System

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for