Problems with variant transaction zme51n

Hi,
I have created a variant transaction zme51n.
But I can only start the transaction when I add the original transaction 'me51n'
in T_Code in profile generator.
Any ideas why?
Thanx for your help in advance.
Thomas

Hallo Rob,
thanx for your help. I think we're on the right track...
Greetings.
Thomas

Similar Messages

Authorization message problem with variant transaction

Hello everybody, I have created a transaction variant ZMM01 from transaction MM01. In the role I specified this new transación (ZMM01) in S-TCODE.
I can create the material but at the end, instead of the message "material zzz created" I received the message "you are not authorised to MM01".
Does anybody know how to solve this problem?
Thanks in advance.
Maria

Thanks for your quick answer but if I run SU53 the result is the following:
Object class AAAB Cross-application Authorization Objects
Authorization Obj. S_TCODE Transaction Code Check at Transactio Start
Authorization Field TCD Codi de transacció MM01.
If I include this I allow the user to access transction MM01, but I don´t want to.

I have a problem with the transaction CBIH82

Hi experts,
I have a problem with the transaction CBIH82, when I try to assign a team in the tab "EventLocation", the transaction sends me the message "Equipment not available at the functional location".
I previously reviewed the equipment is assigned to the transaction IL03.
No authorization errors, I checked with the transaction SU53.
Any idea to solve this problem?
I appreciate it.

Hello,
I happened to again see this post where question is yet to be answered.
As per SAP standard design, only those equipment would be allowed which are directly installed on the functional location. What this means is that those equipment which are not directly assigned to the functional location (might be assigned to another superior equipment which in turn is assigned to the functional location) can't be saved.
Now, I am not sure why SAP has kept it like this when the same is allowed in notification.
Can somebody clarify the business relevance of this standard behavior??
Regards,
Pavan

Problem with "Call Transaction" which calls a view cluster

Hi Colleagues ,
I have a rare issue with the call transaction , here is the use case for it :
1> I call a transaction(calls a screen X) in a report ,
2> I have a button in the screen , which calls another transaction(calls a screen X2) .
3> On the screen X2 i have another button which calls transaction (calls the view cluster ).
problem :
i'm not able to see the navigation pane in the view cluster on the left. its missing .
but when the view cluster is called direclty , i'm able to see the navigation pane in the view cluster ..
My initial doubt was , is this the problem with nesting of 'Call Transaction' calls ????
please answer the thread , i have to fix this ASAP.
regards,
Dilip

problem solved.

Problem with Call Transaction opt-RACOMMIT = 'X'.

Hello Experts
I am having a problem with call transction. I am calling a Z transaction in function module. Within the Z transaction I am furhter calling some function modules and doing commit work and then some more processing after the comit work inside So to make sure the code after comit work is fired I am using opt-RACOMMIT = 'X' in call transaction. Whenever I set this parameter opt-RACOMMIT = 'X' call transaction fails and gives error saying No batch Input data for screen XXXX. However the Z tcode processed succesfully.
By changing the Mode to E i found that it remians at the last screen of call transction after executing the Z transaction and never comes back
But if I donot use RACOMMIT = 'X' everything is fine. Please let me know if anyone came across such problem. Any help will be apreciated.
Thanks,
kamal

Hello,
as you said, if there is more than commit statement in your ztransaction, then you should put RACOMMIT to 'X'.
I think the problem is in your bdcdata: change it to be sure to get back to the 1st screen of your ztransaction. Then, at this point (1st screen) hit "back" button.
Cordialement,
Chaouki

ECR/ECO problem with automated transactions

Hi Friends,
I have problem with automated close of ECR.
Description:
I have change number with one object - Inspection Plan.
In CC32 when "Incorrect Change" is set and I click "Erro Corrected" - nothink happen
(it should show popup with information that transaction cc06 was automated started)
After that when i choose "Release Change" - also nothing happen.
(it should shop popup and set status - "Close ECO")
Everything works ok on sandbox system but on Dev/Test/Prod it doesn't work.
Anybody now where could be a problem?
Thank you for any advice.

Hi
Pls check this Link
SAP-ECM and PPPI Integration-Solution
Thanks in advance

Problem with variant

Hi SDN experts,
what is the Transaction variant ? and Screen variant?

Hi,
Use transaction variant to make your fields mandatory, hidden or display. You can hide unwanted screens and fields in any of the standard SAP programs without changing any of the standard programs. Additional features such as making the variant as default on the standard SAP transaction code is only available on 4.6x.
Steps:
Transaction SHD0 - Create a variant for the required transaction bychanging the layout through hiding fields and screens.
Transaction SE93 - Create a variant transaction (e.g. for VA02 you canname it as ZA02). Next allocate the transaction variant to this varianttransaction.
Create and change the Zxxx area menu with the new transaction variant. In this way, the user does have to remembers any extra transaction codes.
In 4.6c, you can default your transaction variant as the standard variant. (SHD0 - Edit -> Activate/Deactivate asstandard variant)
An example for using transaction variant (restricting the field displayfor CO11N - Goods movement) :-
If you want to restrict changes to the fields in Goods movement forone group of users.
1. Create a transaction variant for CO11N
2. Create a new transction code for the transaction variant and assign an authorization object to it
3. Divide the users into this two transaction code. Those who can change the field using CO11N. For those that have limited
field change, give them the authorizationfor ZCO11 (this is a new transaction code you have to create).
For more information, please check this links:
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_webas620/helpdata/en/eb/5fab41d79b11d296190000e82de14a/content.htm
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw2004s/helpdata/en/43/132f9803d76f40e10000000a422035/content.htm
http://www.sapgenie.com/abap/tvar.htm
Regards,
Ferry Lianto

Problems with 2 transaction data getting intermixed !!!

Hi,
i am using weblogic in my project both as a webserver and as the application server.
But i am facing problems with requests being sent to the server. Basically i have
a form in my jsp which, if submitted by multiple clients at the same instant in
time, the server gets confused and mixes up the data in the requests !! the form
is submitted to another jsp which in turn calls a SLSB which in turn calls various
entity Beans to fulfill the request.
Now if 2 or more clients hit the submit button together, the server is mixing
the data from the requestsand i get corrupted output as a result.
That if i submit values (a,b,c) from one client machine and values (x,y,z) from
another machine, the server puts one of the transactions properly and in the other
it picks up the data from the other request and takes something like (x,y,c) !!
Is this a bug in Weblogic 6.1 or am doing something wrong ??
Any help would be appreciated. Anyone faced something similar ?
Raja

Hi.
Please open a case with support if you haven't already done so.
Regards,
Michael
Raja wrote:
Hi,
i am using weblogic in my project both as a webserver and as the application server.
But i am facing problems with requests being sent to the server. Basically i have
a form in my jsp which, if submitted by multiple clients at the same instant in
time, the server gets confused and mixes up the data in the requests !! the form
is submitted to another jsp which in turn calls a SLSB which in turn calls various
entity Beans to fulfill the request.
Now if 2 or more clients hit the submit button together, the server is mixing
the data from the requestsand i get corrupted output as a result.
That if i submit values (a,b,c) from one client machine and values (x,y,z) from
another machine, the server puts one of the transactions properly and in the other
it picks up the data from the other request and takes something like (x,y,c) !!
Is this a bug in Weblogic 6.1 or am doing something wrong ??
Any help would be appreciated. Anyone faced something similar ?
Raja--
Michael Young
Developer Relations Engineer
BEA Support

LT04 problems with call transaction

Hello,
I am using RF and creating screens for users to putaway material in a raw material warehouse based on a material document number from the GRN which is linked to a TR (transfer requirement). I am, however, having problems with the TO creation where the material is QM relevant.
I have used function module L_TO_CREATE_TR which works for non-QM relevant items but most of our items are QM relevant. I am trying to process these by creating a TO using LT04 as a call transaction.
However, before I can put in a bin , the screen that appears in order to enter the bin has an error message before anything has been input - 'No destination storage bin to be found in storage type 001 "(L3 009).
Anyone have any suggestions how I can get around this as I cannot create the TO in the background using LT04 because of this error.
Regards
Larissa Maryniuk

As mentioned in my original question, I cannot use the LTOCREATE_FROM_TR FM for items set with stock category Q as these are QM relevant. If you try and create a TO from a TR using L_TO_CREATE_TR you get an error of 2 which is item is QM relevant. I cannot see how I can use WS_LM_TRANSFER_ORDER_CREATE as you cannot put in the TR number anywhere. Other than these 2 cannot see how I can create a TO from a TR without using LT04.
If I use LT04 and set as backrground I get the message specified. The way to get around the error using LT04 is only available if T04 is set as Foreground on the front screen instead of background.
Anyone have any suggestions?
Edited by: Larissa Maryniuk on Jan 25, 2010 11:41 AM

Problem with CIC0 transaction OK codes

Hi Experts,
We are using CIC0 transaction in CRM 3.1 system. As you know there is a button "Reset all fields" ( the one with a crooked arrow sign ) which is used to reset all the fields before entering the next business partner. This button is not working consistently. In my system, I am getting an OK CODE of "%_GC 117 1" when I click this button. But, when the actual user ( who is in a geographically different location ) clicks this button, he gets an OK CODE of "CSEARCH_DELETE". As a reslut I am not able to provide some functionality the user asked for. I checked the SAP GUI version, Patch Level, OS Version, and IE version and settings. There is no difference in these between my PC and user's PC. What could be the problem ? Is it due to some problem with BSP ? Please advise.
Regards,
Sameej T.K.

OK CODE? Hmmmm... are you sure that BSP even in sight of transaction CICO, the one with the crooked behaviour? No ideas. This does not sound like BSP.
But if you feel like experimenting, check whether it is language dependent (EN vs DE). This is just wild shot over my shoulder as I exit stage right.

Problem with SAP Transaction iView after Patch 34 install

Hi All,
We're running EP6SP2 on AIX/Oracle and have currently upgraded from PL5 to PL34.
The problem we are now having is as follows:
We have an SAP Transaction iView that is using the 'Auto' method for the 'Technique to start SAPGUI for Windows' and the 'WinGui' as the 'SAP GUI Type'.
Now when we click on the iView we are getting the IE popup that asks us if we want to Save, Open, or Cancel the file open for tx.ssd
Prior to the patch upgrade we did not have this issue.
Any help would be appreciated.
Thanks,
Robin.

Hi Praveen,
Thanks for the quick response.
I have seen those notes already and unfortunately they don't solve this specific problem. These will solve the problem for the SSD method (.sap file) of starting the SAPGUI for Windows but not for the SSF method (.ssf file).
The main issue is that before the install of the Patch we did not get the popup, everything worked fine. It doesn't make sense why we would have to change our IE settings now to get it to work properly. It should work the same as before the patch.
Plus, I don't want to have to do an SMS push to all the PC's here to fix a problem with a Patch upgrade.
I have tried to add the .ssd and .sap types to the Mime section for the http service in the Admin tool but this hasn't fixed the problem either.
Also, I found that in Patch 31 SAP has made a change to the way the SAP GUI for windows starts. After some searching I found that in the file WinGuiRenderLayer.properties under
the 'com.sap.appintegrator.sap/property/Transaction/' folder I see that it has some entries in it that look like they relate to the above mentioned fix for Patch 31. The lines in particular are:
- # postfix for roundtrip URL - should help IE to detect the mime-type
- SSF_URL_Postfix = /tx.sap
- SSD_URL_Postfix = /tx.ssd
These lines were not in this file prior to implementing the patch and I believe that this may be causing the problem.
Any other suggestions would be appreciated.
Thanks,
Robin

Problem with a transaction fbwe

Hello,
I created a consignment of goods to present to the bank with the transaction fbwe. I find that if we create a new execution of effects with the same values, re-select the effects previously treated.
Someone knows, is it exists some way to customazing the system why not to choose effects that have been remitted before, and which are still outstanding account?
Thanks for your help.
Regards
XeviG.

Hi,
Check the entries in V_T045DTA (tcode SM30 - view). Check Note 177154 - Manually changing table T045DTA too.
I hope this helps you
REgards
Eduardo
Edited by: Eduardo Hinojosa on May 21, 2010 2:14 PM

Problem with Trasnporting Transaction Variant

Hi,
I created a transaction variant in development system. Now I need to transport the transaction variant to Quality. I have done that. But in quality system, the variant is not picking up when i run the transaction.
I made it as standard variant. I tried with both Cross client and Client specific transaction variants. But it didn't work at all in Quality system.
Can anybody guide me please where I am missing the flow...?
Thanks,
Sankar.

Guys,
Any clues please...
Thanks,
Sankar.

Problem with variants ?

hi,
while working on the project
I m getting the same problem again and again with the variants i.e "Maintain the variants for the deletion program first".
as the main requirement of the project is to archive the documents through the Transaction SARA .
pls help.

Hi,
For archiving the things first you need to maintain the variant in which the details regarding material document has to be put.
suppose you want to archive material codes then first you have to go to MM71 and provide material codes by creating variants and then you can go to SARA and do rest of the procedure.
Regards,
sunny

Problem WIth Variant in a report program

I have a z report program with couple of variants , the problem is the varaints display onlt name of the variant and description when the varaint button is pressed.
The changed by , date etc details are not getting displayed.
Thanks
Arun

Hi Arun,
You will not get those data directly from the program execution screen. If you want to get those details, please check table VARID for that variant or program.
Regards,
Sourav

Problems with variant transaction zme51n

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for