Problems with web client system 9.2

<p>When I log on to the web client and select the cluster, HFM sendme the error:</p><p> </p><p> </p><table cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" height="100%" width="100%"border="0" id="MainTable"><tr><td valign="top" align="left" height="100%"><table cellpadding="10" align="center" width="80%" border="0"><tr><td>Could not connect to the server HYPPREMEX01.<br>Could not connect to any server in the specified cluster.</td></tr><tr><td><div style=" display: none;" class="showdetailsbutton" id= "idShowDetails"><table cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0"><tr><td onmouseup="this.className='secondaryActive';" title=""onmousedown="this.className='secondaryRollover secondaryClicked';"class="secondaryactive" onmouseout="this.className='secondaryActive';" height="18" nowrap="nowrap"onclick="javascript:ShowDetails()" onmouseover="this.className='secondaryRollover';">Show Details:</td></tr></table></div><div style=" display: inline;" class="debugmessage" id= "idDebugMessage">Error Reference Number:{C8F5D9B6-6EC6-4E96-9767-32FC226CDF2E}<br>Num: 0x80041141;Type: 1;DTime: 16/11/2006 06:55:46 p.m.;Svr:HYPPREMEX01;File: CHsxClient.cpp;Line: 1097;Ver: 9.2.0.0.1106;<br>Num: 0x80041142;Type: 1;DTime: 16/11/2006 06:55:46 p.m.;Svr:HYPPREMEX01;File: CHsxClient.cpp;Line: 758;Ver: 9.2.0.0.1106;<br>Num: 0x80041142;Type: 0;DTime: 16/11/2006 06:55:46 p.m.;Svr:HYPPREMEX01;File: CHsxClient.cpp;Line: 2875;Ver: 9.2.0.0.1106;<br>Num: 0x80041142;Type: 0;DTime: 16/11/2006 06:55:46 p.m.;Svr:HYPPREMEX01;File: CHFMwManageApplications.cpp;Line: 627;Ver:9.2.0.0.1106;</div></td></tr></table></td></tr></table><p>The os is wincows 2003 enterprise edition, anybody knows whatcould be the error?</p><p> </p><p>Thanks in advance!</p><p> </p><p>Anabella</p>

Hi,Check your cluster configuration in HFM Server/Web on the server.I had the same issue. My HFM cluster was not setup properly. Also make sure that you enable the DCOM button.ThanksAzmat Bhatti

Similar Messages

Problem with web.show_document with Jinitiator and Firefox

Not sure Firefox 2.0 is officially certified with Forms 9.0.4.1 and Jinitiatorbut regardless we have some users who want to use this combination. Everything seems to work fine except for the calls to web.show_document which opens a new browser window and displays some html etc.
The problem is that even though the client Forms JVM is Jinitiator (1.3.1.18 or .21) when the call to web.show_document occurs somehow the Sun Java Plugin starts and having the two JVM's at once causes a fatal crash in Firefox. Can anyone suggest a way to preven the second JVM from opening?
When the user uses the Sun Plug as the client Forms JVM there is no problem as the second JVM does not open. Unfortunately some users insist on Jinitiator with Firefox hence the problem. -quinn

James,
This whole applet embedded in a browser model for webforms is driving us batty at times. The list of problems includes:
1) Users are constantly tempted by browser controls and accidentally do all sorts of things to get them in trouble. This has included but not limited to using the navigation arrows, jumping off to read their email in the same window as the form and returning to a dead forms session, minimizing, resizing, blurring off to another window and then returning back by clicking on the title bar of the browser and wondering why the form doesn't tab etc.
Sure hobbling the browser by opening with limited functionality is a possibility but not a complete solution.
2) New versions of browsers seem to break something. Both IE 7 and Firefox 2 have their own problems with web.show_document, especially file associations such as CSV and DBF and trying to open things in Excel in IE7.Firefox seems to have less problems for some yet some some oddities like the one that started this thread (and 2.0 opening new windows in tabs by default instead of windows).
3) JVM jigsaw puzzle. Is it Jinit or Sun, which versions? Which combinations of browser version and JVM works.
4) General fragility of the whole architecture. Running a client JVM in a web browser on top of a PC Operating system connectiong to a forms server over a network embedded in a Java Container server on a full blown web server running on a unix operating system is pushing the bubble. Throw in the mix that any of these components can be combined in numerous ways makes one wonder how it works as well as it does.
Still users randomly getting dropped connections to forms server (network gltches?). General sluggishness (poorly written forms?). Periods of users with unduplicatable errors primarily network related it would appear.
General feel that it is not rock solid stable. Perusing metalink documents on performance and tuning gives too much and too general info to troubleshoot so just shrug shoulders and say 'network problem'.
What's the solution? Java webstart would seem to help at least with the browser realted issues but is that supported and documented how to use yet. Also we'd lose web_show_document which is critical (could it be replaced by webutil calls to open browser?).
-quinn

'A problem with the cooling system' error message on Satellite A660

Hi all,
Hope I can get some help here. I've had about 5 HP laptops after all of them had problems and faults. I got sick of them and therefore got a refund and bought a high spec A660-1FH.
The A660 has been a great laptop for two days until yesterday when I started getting a warning message saying 'A problem with the cooling system has been detected. Please turn off the computer immediately, and return it for service'.
The cpu fan works fine as you can here it spinning and the temperature of the i5-460m processor is around 40 degrees for both cores - which seems normal to me. I've noted that it happens only when running on battery and if you switch from eco utility to power saver mode. Its fine when running on the 'balanced' power setting. The fan is louder before when this message appears.
As its under 28 days my retailer swapped it for a brand new one straight away. Got the new one home, and the same message appears again. Has anyone else experienced this. As two laptops have had this, I'm wondering if this is normal for the A660 series laptop or if there is really a hardware issue?!
I have tried to upgrade eco utility and the bios of the laptop but both are the latest versions. Can anyone help or share if they experience a similar issue with their laptop?
Thanks

In front of me I have Satellite A660-13Q (PSAW3E) and I have it about 6 weeks now. It runs almost 10 hours daily and until now I didnt notice such message or anything else that can be suspect for hardware functionality.
I really dont know why this happen on your notebook and dont think there is anything you can do about it.
I would exchange it again. What you can also try is to contact nearest Toshiba service. Make a call, explain the situation and ask if they can help you with this.

A problem with the cooling system has been detected

I bought a new computer not to long ago, I've had it for almost a month now. It runs fine, and I've had no problems until not too long ago. I was playing a game, and I got a random error message: "A problem with the cooling system has been detected. Please turn off the computer immdiately, and return it for service." I don't understand how or why this came up, and I don't have any money to return it for any type of repairs. After I got this message, I left my computer off for about an hour. All seems well so far. Any suggestions?

What laptop do you have?
- Peter

Problem with Variable Client Support

Hello,
I work with Labview 8.5 and Crio 9014.
I have a problem with Variable Client Support. When I try to compile my project I have the following error:
"The Network Variable Engine and Variable Client Support must be installed on the RT target for this application to function properly..."
I have read that we have to install the Variable Client Support in Measurement and Automation by right-clicking on the software and then choosing add/remove software but I can't install the appropriate shared variable components because I can't see neither Network Variable Engine and Variable Client Support. So what can I do?
Can somebody help me?
Thanks

I have exactly the same problem. I wanted go through the "Getting Started with the LabVIEW RT module" and when I use wizard for generating new project I get same notification in my VI...
The Network Variable Engine and Variable Client Support must be installed on the RT target
for this application to function properly. If the Network Variable Engine is not supported on
the target (e.g. FP-2000 with <32MB of RAM), open the project and move the variable library
to My Computer in the project. Doing this will deploy the variables to localhost but
will still require that Variable Client Support be installed on the RT target.
Could someone help please ?
Attachments:
ni.png ‏95 KB

Problem with the EFI system partition's file system.

I installed latest yosemite 10.10.2 update - did a verify disk on “WDC WD1001FALS-403AA0 Media” (internal HD on my iMac 21.5-inch, Mid 2011) and got
Problems were found with the partition map which might prevent booting
Error: The partition map needs to be repaired because there’s a problem with the EFI system partition’s file system.
However a verify disk on the volume partition gets a clean bill of health!
I haven't done a 'repair disk' yet. Thought I'd check if anybody else has same message first.
Cheers

I had issues where my MacPro 8-core would not boot after the 10.7.4 upgrade, but my MacBook Air 13" 2011 upgrade worked just fine.
I had to restore my MacPro HD from my TimeMachine back up. Apparently, the Softraid raid drivers that I use on my MacPro are not compatible yet with 10.7.4. See here for more info:
http://macperformanceguide.com/blog/2012/20120511_1-MacOSX-SoftRAID.html
I contacted Softraid and they are already aware of the issues and are working with Apple for a fix.
Cheers.
Bud

MacBookPro SSD Error- ALERT: The partition map needs to be repaired because there's a problem with the EFI system partition's file system.

MacBook Pro OS x Mavericks. I have Sandisk 256GB SSD and I am getting a below error message.
ALERT: The partition map needs to be repaired because there's a problem with the EFI system partition's file system.
Does anyone know how to resolve this error and fix it ? unfortunately I don't have a Time Machine backup. Thanks!

Have you tried to run the verify/repair permissions and verify/repair disk through the recovery disk? If that didn't work then I would reinstall the OS after backing up. If that still doesn't work I would take it in.

Problem with transforming coordinate systems

Hiho,
i've got a problem with transforming coordinate systems.
When I'm trying to transform a sdo_geometry object to another coordinate sytem and then back to the old system, the coordinates are not the same.
Here's an example:
StartSystem SRID is 8220 (Longitude / Latitude (DHDN))
TargetSystem SRID is 8307 (Longitude / Latitude (WGS84))
Original object:
Polygon: {ExteriorRing: LineString: { (0.0, -90.0) (1.5, 0.0) (0.0, 90.0) (4.5, 0.0) (0.0, -90.0)} }
Transformed object:
Polygon: {ExteriorRing: LineString: { (0.0, -5156.620156177403) (85.94366926962347, 0.0) (0.0, 5156.620156177403) (257.8310078088704, 0.0) (0.0, -5156.620156177403)} }
Transformed back to old system:
Polygon: {ExteriorRing: LineString: { (0.0, -5156.620156177403) (4924.209525017614, 0.0) (0.0, 5156.620156177403) (14772.628575052844, 0.0) (0.0, -5156.620156177403)} }
Any ideas what to do?
Thanks for the help in advance.
Dirk

Hi Dirk
Since the transform you are trying to do is just a datum conversion of lat./long. coordinates, even the first transform yields obvious rubbish. What you have provided here does not illustrate how you submitted your polygon to CS_TRANSFORM.
Provide the syntax of your construction of the corresponding SDO_GEOMETRY object and your SQL select statement that gave these results.
Bruce

Problems with the File System Repository & User Mapping!

Hi All
I am having a problem with a file system repository, and setting up user mapping for that repository.
I have done the following:
Created a File System Repository
Created a Network Path
Created a System (Including the alias)
Now when I go into User Administration and select my user the is no user mapped systems to select.
All this system is doing is connecering to a folder on our File System.
Any help would be great as this is really frustrating!
Thanks
Phil

I am using EP7 Stack 11 and unfortunately the only options I have are:
user
admin
admin,user
It is currently set to admin, user and does not seem to work!
Phil
Message was edited by:
Phil Wade

Problem with web.xml

Hello,
I have a big problem with web.xml.
i can run the servlet demos with the default web.xml, but when i try to user a costum web.xml files, i receive a 404 page not found on a link.
i have some dificulty to post here. but can somebody help my with my web.xml files?
thanks for your help.
have a nice day!

Be careful with the place of your files and folders. It's possible that you've just mentioned the cause of your problem.
My web.xml is
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>
<!DOCTYPE web-app
PUBLIC "-//Sun Microsystems, Inc.//DTD Web Application 2.3//EN"
"http://java.sun.com/dtd/web-app_2_3.dtd">
<web-app>
<display-name>gco</display-name>
<description>gco webapplicaties</description>
<servlet>
<servlet-name>MopoController</servlet-name>
<servlet-class>org.gertcuppens.controller.MopoController</servlet-class>
</servlet>
<servlet-mapping>
<servlet-name>MopoController</servlet-name>
<url-pattern>/MOPO</url-pattern>
</servlet-mapping>
</web-app>
When I want to call my web application locally, I use the URL http://localhost:8080/gco/MOPO.
The http://localhost:8080 calls Tomcat. With /gco, Tomcat knows it should look for a folder gco inside the webapps folder. This one should contain a WEB-INF/web.xml folder for further instructions.
With /MOPO Tomcat knows, having read the web.xml files of all webapps folders at start, it should look for a servlet with the name MopoController. And this MopoController points to the class org.gertcuppens.controller.MopoController. So, Tomcat knows where to find everything.
Try to see whether your Tomcat can find everything inside the folders using your web.xml file.

Problems with QuickVPN client

Hello,
I experiance problems with QuickVPN client (version 1.4.1.2). I'm trying to connect to router SA520 with 1.1.65 firmware,
vpn tunell is established, but client says "The remote gateway is not responding. Do you want to wait?"
in case i click no, it drops vpn tunell
QuickVPN client log looks like this:
2010/08/18 12:13:27 [STATUS]OS Version: Windows 7
2010/08/18 12:13:27 [STATUS]Windows Firewall Domain Profile Settings: ON
2010/08/18 12:13:27 [STATUS]Windows Firewall Private Profile Settings: ON
2010/08/18 12:13:27 [STATUS]Windows Firewall Private Profile Settings: ON
2010/08/18 12:13:27 [STATUS]One network interface detected with IP address 192.168.1.100
2010/08/18 12:13:27 [STATUS]Connecting...
2010/08/18 12:13:27 [DEBUG]Input VPN Server Address = vpn.in-volv.lv
2010/08/18 12:13:28 [STATUS]Connecting to remote gateway with IP address: 78.28.223.10
2010/08/18 12:13:28 [WARNING]Server's certificate doesn't exist on your local computer.
2010/08/18 12:13:30 [STATUS]Remote gateway was reached by https ...
2010/08/18 12:13:30 [STATUS]Provisioning...
2010/08/18 12:13:39 [STATUS]Success to connect.
2010/08/18 12:13:39 [STATUS]Tunnel is configured. Ping test is about to start.
2010/08/18 12:13:39 [STATUS]Verifying Network...
2010/08/18 12:13:44 [WARNING]Failed to ping remote VPN Router!
2010/08/18 12:13:47 [WARNING]Failed to ping remote VPN Router!
2010/08/18 12:13:50 [WARNING]Failed to ping remote VPN Router!
2010/08/18 12:13:53 [WARNING]Failed to ping remote VPN Router!
2010/08/18 12:13:56 [WARNING]Failed to ping remote VPN Router!
2010/08/18 12:14:08 [WARNING]Ping was blocked, which can be caused by an unexpected disconnect.
2010/08/18 12:14:12 [STATUS]Disconnecting...
2010/08/18 12:14:15 [STATUS]Success to disconnect.
Server logs look like this:
2010-08-18 12:28:49: INFO: Adding IPSec configuration with identifier "arvils"
2010-08-18 12:29:02: INFO: Configuration found for 83.243.93.200[500].
2010-08-18 12:29:02: INFO: Received request for new phase 1 negotiation: 78.28.223.10[500]<=>83.243.93.200[500]
2010-08-18 12:29:02: INFO: Beginning Identity Protection mode.
2010-08-18 12:29:02: INFO: Received Vendor ID: MS NT5 ISAKMPOAKLEY
2010-08-18 12:29:02: INFO: Received Vendor ID: RFC 3947
2010-08-18 12:29:02: INFO: Received Vendor ID: draft-ietf-ipsec-nat-t-ike-02
2010-08-18 12:29:02: INFO: Received unknown Vendor ID
2010-08-18 12:29:02: INFO: Received unknown Vendor ID
2010-08-18 12:29:02: INFO: Received unknown Vendor ID
2010-08-18 12:29:02: INFO: Received unknown Vendor ID
2010-08-18 12:29:02: INFO: For 83.243.93.200[500], Selected NAT-T version: RFC 3947
2010-08-18 12:29:02: INFO: NAT-D payload matches for 78.28.223.10[500]
2010-08-18 12:29:02: INFO: NAT-D payload does not match for 83.243.93.200[500]
2010-08-18 12:29:02: INFO: NAT detected: PEER
2010-08-18 12:29:02: INFO: Floating ports for NAT-T with peer 83.243.93.200[4500]
2010-08-18 12:29:02: INFO: ISAKMP-SA established for 78.28.223.10[4500]-83.243.93.200[4500] with spi:e2cd855a75fc0887:6dc3b2e025152444
2010-08-18 12:29:02: INFO: Sending Informational Exchange: notify payload[INITIAL-CONTACT]
2010-08-18 12:29:02: INFO: Responding to new phase 2 negotiation: 78.28.223.10[0]<=>83.243.93.200[0]
2010-08-18 12:29:02: INFO: Using IPsec SA configuration: 192.168.75.0/24<->192.168.1.100/32
2010-08-18 12:29:02: INFO: Adjusting peer's encmode 3(3)->Tunnel(1)
2010-08-18 12:29:02: INFO: IPsec-SA established[UDP encap 4500->4500]: ESP/Tunnel 83.243.93.200->78.28.223.10 with spi=47693803(0x2d7bfeb)
2010-08-18 12:29:02: INFO: IPsec-SA established[UDP encap 4500->4500]: ESP/Tunnel 78.28.223.10->83.243.93.200 with spi=1079189482(0x40531fea)
2010-08-18 12:35:57: INFO: an undead schedule has been deleted: 'pk_recvupdate'.
2010-08-18 12:35:57: INFO: Purged IPsec-SA with proto_id=ESP and spi=1079189482(0x40531fea).
2010-08-18 12:40:46: INFO: Configuration found for 83.243.93.200[500].
2010-08-18 12:40:46: INFO: Received request for new phase 1 negotiation: 78.28.223.10[500]<=>83.243.93.200[500]
2010-08-18 12:40:46: INFO: Beginning Identity Protection mode.
2010-08-18 12:40:46: INFO: Received Vendor ID: MS NT5 ISAKMPOAKLEY
2010-08-18 12:40:46: INFO: Received Vendor ID: RFC 3947
2010-08-18 12:40:46: INFO: Received Vendor ID: draft-ietf-ipsec-nat-t-ike-02
2010-08-18 12:40:46: INFO: Received unknown Vendor ID
2010-08-18 12:40:46: INFO: Received unknown Vendor ID
2010-08-18 12:40:46: INFO: Received unknown Vendor ID
2010-08-18 12:40:46: INFO: For 83.243.93.200[500], Selected NAT-T version: RFC 3947
2010-08-18 12:40:46: INFO: NAT-D payload matches for 78.28.223.10[500]
2010-08-18 12:40:46: INFO: NAT-D payload does not match for 83.243.93.200[500]
2010-08-18 12:40:46: INFO: NAT detected: PEER
2010-08-18 12:40:46: INFO: Floating ports for NAT-T with peer 83.243.93.200[4500]
2010-08-18 12:40:46: INFO: ISAKMP-SA established for 78.28.223.10[4500]-83.243.93.200[4500] with spi:28447d39874689f9:a2b7da19d8d86413
2010-08-18 12:40:46: INFO: Responding to new phase 2 negotiation: 78.28.223.10[0]<=>83.243.93.200[0]
2010-08-18 12:40:46: INFO: Using IPsec SA configuration: 192.168.75.0/24<->192.168.1.100/32
2010-08-18 12:40:46: INFO: Adjusting peer's encmode 3(3)->Tunnel(1)
2010-08-18 12:40:47: INFO: IPsec-SA established[UDP encap 4500->4500]: ESP/Tunnel 83.243.93.200->78.28.223.10 with spi=259246202(0xf73c87a)
2010-08-18 12:40:47: INFO: IPsec-SA established[UDP encap 4500->4500]: ESP/Tunnel 78.28.223.10->83.243.93.200 with spi=3642234214(0xd9181566)
2010-08-18 12:43:27: INFO: IPsec-SA expired: ESP/Tunnel 83.243.93.200->78.28.223.10 with spi=33356156(0x1fcf97c)
2010-08-18 12:45:47: INFO: an undead schedule has been deleted: 'pk_recvupdate'.
2010-08-18 12:45:47: INFO: Purged IPsec-SA with proto_id=ESP and spi=3642234214(0xd9181566).
The most interesting thing is that sometimes this message appears, sometimes not (with the same configuration).
Please help!

Hi,
I have some problem. I am using Windows 7 Entreprice x64. I use SA520 Firmware 1.1.65 and QuickVPN 1.4.1.2 port 60443.
"The remote gateway is not responding. Do you want to wait"
2010-08-18 17:25:51: INFO: Adding IPSec configuration with identifier "username"
2010-08-18 17:25:51: INFO: Adding IKE configuration with identifer "username"
2010-08-18 17:26:04: INFO: Configuration found for xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx[235].
2010-08-18 17:26:04: INFO: Received request for new phase 1 negotiation: 172.22.5.10[500]<=>xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx[235]
2010-08-18 17:26:04: INFO: Beginning Identity Protection mode.
2010-08-18 17:26:04: INFO: Received Vendor ID: MS NT5 ISAKMPOAKLEY
2010-08-18 17:26:04: INFO: Received Vendor ID: RFC 3947
2010-08-18 17:26:04: INFO: Received Vendor ID: draft-ietf-ipsec-nat-t-ike-02
2010-08-18 17:26:04: INFO: Received unknown Vendor ID
2010-08-18 17:26:04: INFO: Received unknown Vendor ID
2010-08-18 17:26:04: INFO: Received unknown Vendor ID
2010-08-18 17:26:04: INFO: Received unknown Vendor ID
2010-08-18 17:26:04: INFO: For xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx[235], Selected NAT-T version: RFC 3947
2010-08-18 17:26:04: INFO: NAT-D payload does not match for 172.22.5.10[500]
2010-08-18 17:26:04: INFO: NAT-D payload does not match for xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx[235]
2010-08-18 17:26:04: INFO: NAT detected: ME PEER
2010-08-18 17:26:04: INFO: Floating ports for NAT-T with peer xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx[48540]
2010-08-18 17:26:04: INFO: ISAKMP-SA established for 172.22.5.10[4500]- xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx[48540] with spi:ed4f291c71c1b688:7e6a8a0968f878fb
2010-08-18 17:26:04: INFO: Sending Informational Exchange: notify payload[INITIAL-CONTACT]
2010-08-18 17:26:04: INFO: Responding to new phase 2 negotiation: 172.22.5.10[0]<=> xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx[0]
2010-08-18 17:26:04: INFO: Using IPsec SA configuration: 192.168.75.0/24<->192.168.170.224/32
2010-08-18 17:26:04: INFO: Adjusting peer's encmode 3(3)->Tunnel(1)
2010-08-18 17:26:05: INFO: IPsec-SA established[UDP encap 48540->4500]: ESP/Tunnel xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx->172.22.5.10 with spi=239099274(0xe405d8a)
2010-08-18 17:26:05: INFO: IPsec-SA established[UDP encap 4500->48540]: ESP/Tunnel 172.22.5.10-> xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx with spi=3886848189(0xe7ac98bd)
2010-08-18 17:26:07: INFO: Configuration found for xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx[235].
2010-08-18 17:26:07: INFO: Received request for new phase 1 negotiation: 172.22.5.10[500]<=> xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx[235]
2010-08-18 17:26:07: INFO: Beginning Identity Protection mode.
2010-08-18 17:26:07: INFO: Received Vendor ID: MS NT5 ISAKMPOAKLEY
2010-08-18 17:26:07: INFO: Received Vendor ID: RFC 3947
2010-08-18 17:26:07: INFO: Received Vendor ID: draft-ietf-ipsec-nat-t-ike-02
2010-08-18 17:26:07: INFO: Received unknown Vendor ID
2010-08-18 17:26:07: INFO: Received unknown Vendor ID
2010-08-18 17:26:07: INFO: Received unknown Vendor ID
2010-08-18 17:26:07: INFO: For xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx[235], Selected NAT-T version: RFC 3947
2010-08-18 17:26:07: INFO: NAT-D payload does not match for 172.22.5.10[500]
2010-08-18 17:26:07: INFO: NAT-D payload does not match for xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx[235]
2010-08-18 17:26:07: INFO: NAT detected: ME PEER
2010-08-18 17:26:07: INFO: Floating ports for NAT-T with peer xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx[48540]
2010-08-18 17:26:07: INFO: ISAKMP-SA established for 172.22.5.10[4500]- xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx[48540] with spi:699f34b434d4318c:df4adca414787d36
2010-08-18 17:27:14: INFO: Purged ISAKMP-SA with proto_id=ISAKMP and spi=699f34b434d4318c:df4adca414787d36.
2010-08-18 17:27:14: INFO: Configuration found for xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx[235].
2010-08-18 17:27:14: INFO: Received request for new phase 1 negotiation: 172.22.5.10[500]<=> xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx[235]
2010-08-18 17:27:14: INFO: Beginning Identity Protection mode.
2010-08-18 17:27:14: INFO: Received Vendor ID: MS NT5 ISAKMPOAKLEY
2010-08-18 17:27:14: INFO: Received Vendor ID: RFC 3947
2010-08-18 17:27:14: INFO: Received Vendor ID: draft-ietf-ipsec-nat-t-ike-02
2010-08-18 17:27:14: INFO: Received unknown Vendor ID
2010-08-18 17:27:14: INFO: Received unknown Vendor ID
2010-08-18 17:27:14: INFO: Received unknown Vendor ID
2010-08-18 17:27:14: INFO: For xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx[235], Selected NAT-T version: RFC 3947
2010-08-18 17:27:14: INFO: NAT-D payload does not match for 172.22.5.10[500]
2010-08-18 17:27:14: INFO: NAT-D payload does not match for xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx[235]
2010-08-18 17:27:14: INFO: NAT detected: ME PEER
2010-08-18 17:27:15: INFO: ISAKMP-SA deleted for 172.22.5.10[4500]- xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx[48540] with spi:699f34b434d4318c:df4adca414787d36
2010-08-18 17:27:15: INFO: Floating ports for NAT-T with peer xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx[48540]
2010-08-18 17:27:15: INFO: ISAKMP-SA established for 172.22.5.10[4500]- xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx[48540] with spi:3fe5eb0bddbf2b9a:f5c11d7f813ca74a
2010-08-18 17:27:15: INFO: Sending Informational Exchange: notify payload[INITIAL-CONTACT]
2010-08-18 17:28:20: INFO: Purged ISAKMP-SA with proto_id=ISAKMP and spi=3fe5eb0bddbf2b9a:f5c11d7f813ca74a.
2010-08-18 17:28:21: INFO: ISAKMP-SA deleted for 172.22.5.10[4500]- xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx[48540] with spi:3fe5eb0bddbf2b9a:f5c11d7f813ca74a
With windows XP Pro i dont have this problem.
Is there a detailed configuration guide?
10x

We encountered a problem with some client machines that use Firefox version 24ESR and IE8. Ajax requests of aspx pages from Firefox are getting the following er

I encountered a problem with some client machines that use Firefox version 24ESR and IE8.
Ajax requests of aspx pages from Firefox are getting the following error from the iis server (iis version 7.5):
Bad Request - Request Too Long
HTTP Error 400. The size of the request headers is too long.
From analyzing the request that was sent to the server, I saw that the request consist of only the viewstate of the aspx page.
I tried to disable the viewstate for one page and the server got the request correctly.
I do not encounter any issues on these laptops with postback requests from Firefox or when running the same application with IE8.

Sometimes that means that the page address sent is loo long.
Check the link address you are using.
I can't help you further and will send for more help.

Satellite A40- Warning: problem with the cooling system has been detected

Hello guys,
I'm getting the following message from time to time:
Warning: a problem with the cooling system has been detected Toshiba
Please turn off the computer immediately, and return it for servise.
I have Windows XP on it.
I opened the cooling fan and clean it. Off course, I found it rally dirty.
But, still I'm getting this message!!!
What I shall to do ??
I'm living in north Germany.
Any advise is most welcome and thanks in advance.
Ibraheem

Hi
The message says everything!!!
In such case you have to contact the authorized service provider in you country!
>I opened the cooling fan and clean it. Off course, I found it rally dirty.
Possibly the cooling modules dont as should and therefore the message appears again!
Nothing to do buddy... you need an help from notebook technician

Satellite P500-12D - A problem with the cooling system has been detected

hi there everyone,
I have bought a Satellite P500-12D which was a retail return. When I start it up it runs a couple of mins and then this comes up on the screen:
Warning: A problem with the cooling system has been detected. please turn off the computer immediately and return it for service.
In the toshiba health monitor the cpu is under 50% temp and if it goes much above that the cooling fan comes on and lowers it back down and the fan stops again, I have noticed that only the r/h fan runs to cool the cpu, should both them come on together? Could it be a software problem?
Tthe unit is new without even the plastic off the screen surround or webcam. Any help or even point me in the right direction would be very appreciated, gary

The fact that the pc is a retail return would indicate that there was a fault at day one and the customer returned it. At some point the retailer turned it on and since it appeared to work re-sold it.
This is the cooling/fan report from a P500 produced by pc wizard 2010 - free from cpuid.com. Perhaps a comparison against the faulty laptop will point to the problem
<<< Voltage, Temperature and Fans >>>
> Hardware Monitoring : National LM79
> Voltage CPU : 1.02 V
> +3.3V Voltage : 1.02 V
> +5V Voltage : 0.43 V
> +12V Voltage : 1.02 V
> Chassis Fan : 42187 rpm
> Power/Aux Fan : 21093 rpm
> Processor Temperature : 64 C
> Mainboard Temperature : 16 C
> Hardware Monitoring : ACPI
> Thermal Zone : 48 C
> Processor :
> Intel Mobile Core 2 Duo (Core 1) : 57 C
> Intel Mobile Core 2 Duo (Core 2) : 58 C
> NVIDIA GeForce GT 230M : nVidia Driver
> GPU Temperature : 35 C
> GPU Diode : 35 C
> GPU Fan : 100.0%
> Hard Disk Monitoring : S.M.A.R.T
> Hard Disk TOSHIBA MK5055GSX (Assembly) : 38 C
> Hard Disk TOSHIBA MK5055GSX (Assembly) : 27 C

ISE 1.2 web authentication problem with wired clients

Hello,
i am having problems with centralized web authentication using a Catalyst 3650X with IOS 15.0.2 SE01 and ISE 1.2.
Redirecting the client works fine, but as soon the client opens a web browser and ISE websites open to authenticate the client, the switch port resets, the authentication process restarts and the session ID changes. After the client enters the credentials a session expired messages appears on the client and i get an 86017 Session Missing message in ISE.
here the output form the debug aaa coa log.
Any ideas
thanks in advanced
Alex
! CLIENT CONNECT TO SWITCHPORT
ISE-TEST-SWITCH#show authentication sessions interface gi0/3
Interface: GigabitEthernet0/3
MAC Address: 001f.297b.bd82
IP Address: 10.2.12.45
User-Name: 00-1F-29-7B-BD-82
Status: Authz Success
Domain: DATA
Security Policy: Should Secure
Security Status: Unsecure
Oper host mode: multi-auth
Oper control dir: both
Authorized By: Authentication Server
Vlan Policy: N/A
ACS ACL: xACSACLx-IP-PERMIT_ALL_TRAFFIC-537cb1d6
URL Redirect ACL: ACL-WEBAUTH-REDIRECT
URL Redirect: https://nos-ch-wbn-ise1.nosergroup.lan:8443/guestportal/gateway?sessionId=AC1484640000026B28C02CDC&action=cwa
Session timeout: N/A
Idle timeout: N/A
Common Session ID: AC1484640000026B28C02CDC
Acct Session ID: 0x0000029C
Handle: 0x8C00026C
Runnable methods list:
Method State
dot1x Failed over
mab Authc Success
! CLIENT OPENS INTERNETEXPLORER -> REDIRECTS TO ISE
! SWITCHPORT GOES IN ADMINISTRATIVE DOWN STARTS AUTHENTICATION AGAIN
ISE-TEST-SWITCH#
191526: .Jun 24 10:42:24.340 UTC: COA: 10.0.128.38 request queued
191527: .Jun 24 10:42:24.340 UTC: RADIUS: authenticator 7F A9 85 AB F6 4A D0 F3 - B4 E6 F2 56 74 C6 2D 33
191528: .Jun 24 10:42:24.340 UTC: RADIUS: NAS-IP-Address [4] 6 172.20.132.100
191529: .Jun 24 10:42:24.340 UTC: RADIUS: Calling-Station-Id [31] 19 "00:1F:29:7B:BD:82"
191530: .Jun 24 10:42:24.340 UTC: RADIUS: Acct-Terminate-Cause[49] 6 admin-reset [6]
191531: .Jun 24 10:42:24.340 UTC: RADIUS: Event-Timestamp [55] 6 1403606529
191532: .Jun 24 10:42:24.340 UTC: RADIUS: Message-Authenticato[80] 18
191533: .Jun 24 10:42:24.340 UTC: RADIUS: E0 3C B2 8C 89 47 67 A8 69 F5 3D 08 61 FF 53 6E [ <Ggi=aSn]
191534: .Jun 24 10:42:24.340 UTC: RADIUS: Vendor, Cisco [26] 43
191535: .Jun 24 10:42:24.340 UTC: RADIUS: Cisco AVpair [1] 37 "subscriber:command=bounce-host-port"
191536: .Jun 24 10:42:24.340 UTC: COA: Message Authenticator decode passed
191537: .Jun 24 10:42:24.340 UTC: ++++++ CoA Attribute List ++++++
191538: .Jun 24 10:42:24.340 UTC: 06D96C58 0 00000001 nas-ip-address(600) 4 172.20.132.100
191539: .Jun 24 10:42:24.349 UTC: 06D9AC18 0 00000081 formatted-clid(37) 17 00:1F:29:7B:BD:82
191540: .Jun 24 10:42:24.349 UTC: 06D9AC4C 0 00000001 disc-cause(434) 4 admin-reset
191541: .Jun 24 10:42:24.349 UTC: 06D9AC80 0 00000001 Event-Timestamp(445) 4 1403606529(53A95601)
191542: .Jun 24 10:42:24.349 UTC: 06D9ACB4 0 00000081 ssg-command-code(490) 1 33
191543: .Jun 24 10:42:24.349 UTC:
191544: .Jun 24 2014 10:42:24.365 UTC: %EPM-6-IPEVENT: IP 10.2.12.45| MAC 001f.297b.bd82| AuditSessionID AC1484640000026B28C02CDC| AUTHTYPE DOT1X| EVENT IP-RELEASE
191545: .Jun 24 2014 10:42:24.382 UTC: %EPM-6-IPEVENT: IP 10.2.12.45| MAC 001f.297b.bd82| AuditSessionID AC1484640000026B28C02CDC| AUTHTYPE DOT1X| EVENT IP-WAIT
191546: .Jun 24 2014 10:42:24.382 UTC: %EPM-6-POLICY_REQ: IP 0.0.0.0| MAC 001f.297b.bd82| AuditSessionID AC1484640000026B28C02CDC| AUTHTYPE DOT1X| EVENT REMOVE
191547: .Jun 24 2014 10:42:24.390 UTC: %EPM-6-AUTH_ACL: POLICY Auth-Default-ACL-OPEN| EVENT DETACH-SUCCESS
191548: .Jun 24 2014 10:42:26.353 UTC: %LINK-5-CHANGED: Interface GigabitEthernet0/3, changed state to administratively down
191549: .Jun 24 2014 10:42:27.359 UTC: %LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interface GigabitEthernet0/3, changed state to down
ISE-TEST-SWITCH#
191550: .Jun 24 2014 10:42:36.366 UTC: %LINK-3-UPDOWN: Interface GigabitEthernet0/3, changed state to down
191551: .Jun 24 10:42:40.592 UTC: AAA/BIND(000002A7): Bind i/f
191552: .Jun 24 2014 10:42:41.129 UTC: %AUTHMGR-5-START: Starting 'dot1x' for client (001f.297b.bd82) on Interface Gi0/3 AuditSessionID AC1484640000026C28C2FA05
191553: .Jun 24 2014 10:42:42.580 UTC: %LINK-3-UPDOWN: Interface GigabitEthernet0/3, changed state to up
191554: .Jun 24 2014 10:42:43.586 UTC: %LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interface GigabitEthernet0/3, changed state to up
! SESSION ID CHANGES, USER ENTERS CREDENTIALS
! ERROR MESSAGE AT CLIENT "YOUR SESSION HAS EXPIRED"
! ERROR MESSAGE IN ISE "86017 SESSION MISSING"
ISE-TEST-SWITCH#show authentication sessions interface gi0/3
Interface: GigabitEthernet0/3
MAC Address: 001f.297b.bd82
IP Address: 10.2.12.45
Status: Running
Domain: UNKNOWN
Security Policy: Should Secure
Security Status: Unsecure
Oper host mode: multi-auth
Oper control dir: both
Session timeout: N/A
Idle timeout: N/A
Common Session ID: AC1484640000026C28C2FA05
Acct Session ID: 0x0000029D
Handle: 0x2C00026D
Runnable methods list:
Method State
dot1x Running
mab Not run

Guest authentication failed: 86017: Session cache entry missing
try adjusting the UTC timezone during the guest creation in the sponsor portal.
86017
Guest
Session Missing
Session ID missing. Please contact your System Administrator.
Info

Problems with web client system 9.2

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for