/proc/cpuinfo shows only 1 core on dual-core CPU [SOLVED]
I've recently gone from Arch i686 to Arch x86_64, and now /proc/cpuinfo shows only one core even though it's a dual-core CPU.
cat /proc/cpuinfo
processor : 0
vendor_id : GenuineIntel
cpu family : 6
model : 23
model name : Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Duo CPU P8400 @ 2.26GHz
stepping : 6
cpu MHz : 2266.542
cache size : 3072 KB
physical id : 0
siblings : 1
core id : 0
cpu cores : 1
apicid : 0
initial apicid : 0
fpu : yes
fpu_exception : yes
cpuid level : 10
wp : yes
flags : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov pat pse36 clflush dts acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht tm pbe syscall nx lm constant_tsc up arch_perfmon pebs bts rep_good aperfmperf pni dtes64 monitor ds_cpl vmx smx est tm2 ssse3 cx16 xtpr pdcm sse4_1 lahf_lm tpr_shadow vnmi flexpriority
bogomips : 4534.96
clflush size : 64
cache_alignment : 64
address sizes : 36 bits physical, 48 bits virtual
power management:
Have anyone experienced similar problems on x86_64?
Could it possibly be a kernel related error?
/AcId
Last edited by AcId (2010-09-08 21:33:27)
dmesg shows some iterensting info about "Unsupported number of siblings" ?
dmesg | grep CPU:
SMP: Allowing 1 CPUs, 0 hotplug CPUs
setup_percpu: NR_CPUS:16 nr_cpumask_bits:16 nr_cpu_ids:1 nr_node_ids:1
PERCPU: Embedded 29 pages/cpu @ffff880001800000 s88832 r8192 d21760 u2097152
SLUB: Genslabs=13, HWalign=64, Order=0-3, MinObjects=0, CPUs=1, Nodes=1
RCU-based detection of stalled CPUs is disabled.
Verbose stalled-CPUs detection is disabled.
CPU: Unsupported number of siblings 2
mce: CPU supports 6 MCE banks
CPU0: Thermal monitoring enabled (TM2)
weird, boot CPU (#0) not listed by the BIOS.
Brought up 1 CPUs
Similar Messages
-
Cpuinfo showing only one processor
Hey guys, I just got a new motherboard( cheapass Biostar P4M80-M4) and I'm having problems getting SMP working/figuring out if its working. Doing a `cat /proc/cpuinfo` shows that I only have a processor 0. I am absolutely sure that this processor supports hyperthreading. Hyperthreading is enabled in BIOS and POST confirms this by saying that an HT processor is detected and HT is enabled. The noapic kernel flag is not being set. Booting into DSL shows that I have 2 processes. Any thoughts or ideas? Thanks.
oh yeah i forgot to mention that I'm running stock kernel 2.6.21.
$ dmesg | grep -i processor
Intel MultiProcessor Specification v1.4
Processor #0 15:3 APIC version 17
Processors: 1
Detected 3089.608 MHz processor.
Checking if this processor honours the WP bit even in supervisor mode... Ok.
CPU: Physical Processor ID: 0
Total of 1 processors activated (6186.46 BogoMIPS).
so it is only bringing up one processor?
Last edited by _adam_ (2007-06-13 18:20:59) -
HT1544 Can I install snow leopard in a Intel Core i5 dual core, 2.5 GHz Mac mini?
I whant to install Snow leopard in a Intel Core i5 dual core de 2.5 GHz Mac Mini, is there any problem to do it?
Not in Minis after 2010.
-
Dear I am using iphone 4s now its connected with pc to create contact group. I have 750 contacts in phone but pc showing only 36. How can i solve this? How can I see all contacts in pc?
HI,
It may pay to bookmark this page.
http://www.apple.com/support/systemstatus/
8:40 PM Wednesday; April 10, 2013
iMac 2.5Ghz 5i 2011 (Mountain Lion 10.8.3)
G4/1GhzDual MDD (Leopard 10.5.8)
MacBookPro 2Gb (Snow Leopard 10.6.8)
Mac OS X (10.6.8),
Couple of iPhones and an iPad
"Limit the Logs to the Bits above Binary Images." No, Seriously -
/proc/cpuinfo shows 1 cpu on 4x6 core machine
Installed VM Server 3.03 on a 4x6 core CPU machine.
- VM Manager shows the machine as having 1 CPU
- /proc/cpuinfo on the VM server shows only one CPU
[root@dcporat05 ~]# cat /proc/cpuinfo
processor : 0
vendor_id : GenuineIntel
cpu family : 6
model : 29
model name : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E7450 @ 2.40GHz
stepping : 1
cpu MHz : 2400.158
cache size : 12288 KB
physical id : 0
siblings : 1
core id : 0
cpu cores : 1
apicid : 0
initial apicid : 0
fpu : yes
fpu_exception : yes
cpuid level : 11
wp : yes
flags : fpu de tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr mca cmov pat clflush acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht syscall lm constant_tsc up rep_good aperfmperf pni est ssse3 cx16 sse4_1 hypervisor lahf_lm
bogomips : 4802.39
clflush size : 64
cache_alignment : 64
address sizes : 40 bits physical, 48 bits virtual
power management:- dmidecode shows 4 CPU's
[root@dcporat05 ~]# dmidecode | grep "Socket Designation"
Socket Designation: Proc 1
Socket Designation: Proc 2
Socket Designation: Proc 3
Socket Designation: Proc 4
Socket Designation: Processor 1 Internal L1 Cache
Socket Designation: Processor 2 Internal L1 Cache
Socket Designation: Processor 3 Internal L1 Cache
Socket Designation: Processor 4 Internal L1 Cache
Socket Designation: Processor 1 Internal L2 Cache
Socket Designation: Processor 2 Internal L2 Cache
Socket Designation: Processor 3 Internal L2 Cache
Socket Designation: Processor 4 Internal L2 Cache
Socket Designation: Processor 1 Internal L3 Cache
Socket Designation: Processor 2 Internal L3 Cache
Socket Designation: Processor 3 Internal L3 Cache
Socket Designation: Processor 4 Internal L3 CacheIs this an issue?
Thanks,
Fraserxm info appears to show one CPU as well
[root@dcporat05 ~]# xm info
release : 2.6.32.21-45xen
version : #1 SMP Wed Nov 30 00:49:18 EST 2011
machine : x86_64
nr_cpus : 1
nr_nodes : 1
cores_per_socket : 1
threads_per_core : 1
cpu_mhz : 2400
hw_caps : bfebfbff:20000800:00000000:00000940:000ce3bd:00000000:00000001:00000000
virt_caps : hvm
total_memory : 65532
free_memory : 62993
node_to_cpu : node0:0
node_to_memory : node0:62993
node_to_dma32_mem : node0:3255
max_node_id : 0
xen_major : 4
xen_minor : 0
xen_extra : .2-OVM
xen_caps : xen-3.0-x86_64 xen-3.0-x86_32p hvm-3.0-x86_32 hvm-3.0-x86_32p hvm-3.0-x86_64
xen_scheduler : credit
xen_pagesize : 4096
platform_params : virt_start=0xffff800000000000
xen_changeset : unavailable
xen_commandline : dom0_mem=1828M
cc_compiler : gcc version 4.1.2 20080704 (Red Hat 4.1.2-48)
cc_compile_by : mockbuild
cc_compile_domain : (none)
cc_compile_date : Thu Sep 22 16:11:15 EDT 2011
xend_config_format : 4Same with dmesg I think
[root@dcporat05 ~]# xm dmesg
\ \/ /___ _ __ | || | / _ \ |___ \ / _ \ \ / / \/ |
\ // _ \ '_ \ | || |_| | | | __) |__| | | \ \ / /| |\/| |
/ \ __/ | | | |__ _| |_| | / __/|__| |_| |\ V / | | | |
/_/\_\___|_| |_| |_|(_)___(_)_____| \___/ \_/ |_| |_|
(XEN) Xen version 4.0.2-OVM (mockbuild@(none)) (gcc version 4.1.2 20080704 (Red Hat 4.1.2-48)) Thu Sep 22 16:11:15 EDT 2011
(XEN) Latest ChangeSet: unavailable
(XEN) Bootloader: GNU GRUB 0.97
(XEN) Command line: dom0_mem=1828M
(XEN) Video information:
(XEN) VGA is text mode 80x25, font 8x16
(XEN) VBE/DDC methods: none; EDID transfer time: 2 seconds
(XEN) EDID info not retrieved because no DDC retrieval method detected
(XEN) Disc information:
(XEN) Found 1 MBR signatures
(XEN) Found 1 EDD information structures
(XEN) Xen-e820 RAM map:
(XEN) 0000000000000000 - 000000000009f400 (usable)
(XEN) 000000000009f400 - 00000000000a0000 (reserved)
(XEN) 00000000000f0000 - 0000000000100000 (reserved)
(XEN) 0000000000100000 - 00000000cfd2e000 (usable)
(XEN) 00000000cfd2e000 - 00000000cfd48000 (ACPI data)
(XEN) 00000000cfd48000 - 00000000cfd49000 (usable)
(XEN) 00000000cfd49000 - 00000000d0000000 (reserved)
(XEN) 00000000e0000000 - 00000000f0000000 (reserved)
(XEN) 00000000fec00000 - 00000000fed00000 (reserved)
(XEN) 00000000fee00000 - 00000000fee10000 (reserved)
(XEN) 00000000ffc00000 - 0000000100000000 (reserved)
(XEN) 0000000100000000 - 000000102ffff000 (usable)
(XEN) ACPI: RSDP 000F4F20, 0024 (r2 HP )
(XEN) ACPI: XSDT CFD2E900, 007C (r1 HP ProLiant 2 Ò 162E)
(XEN) ACPI: FACP CFD2E9C0, 00F4 (r3 HP ProLiant 2 Ò 162E)
(XEN) ACPI: DSDT CFD2EAC0, 2453 (r1 HP DSDT 1 INTL 20030228)
(XEN) ACPI: FACS CFD2E100, 0040
(XEN) ACPI: SPCR CFD2E140, 0050 (r1 HP SPCRRBSU 1 Ò 162E)
(XEN) ACPI: MCFG CFD2E1C0, 003C (r1 HP ProLiant 1 0)
(XEN) ACPI: HPET CFD2E200, 0038 (r1 HP ProLiant 2 Ò 162E)
(XEN) ACPI: FFFF CFD2E240, 0064 (r2 HP I17 2 Ò 162E)
(XEN) ACPI: SPMI CFD2E2C0, 0040 (r5 HP ProLiant 1 Ò 162E)
(XEN) ACPI: ERST CFD2E300, 01D0 (r1 HP ProLiant 1 Ò 162E)
(XEN) ACPI: FFFF CFD2E500, 015E (r1 HP ProLiant 2 0)
(XEN) ACPI: FFFF CFD2E680, 0176 (r1 HP ProLiant 1 Ò 162E)
(XEN) ACPI: BERT CFD2E800, 0030 (r1 HP ProLiant 1 Ò 162E)
(XEN) ACPI: HEST CFD2E840, 00BC (r1 HP ProLiant 1 Ò 162E)
(XEN) System RAM: 65532MB (67105588kB)
(XEN) Domain heap initialised
(XEN) Found and enabled local APIC!
(XEN) Using scheduler: SMP Credit Scheduler (credit)
(XEN) Detected 2400.158 MHz processor.
(XEN) Initing memory sharing.
(XEN) VMX: Supported advanced features:
(XEN) - APIC MMIO access virtualisation
(XEN) - APIC TPR shadow
(XEN) - Virtual NMI
(XEN) - MSR direct-access bitmap
(XEN) HVM: ASIDs disabled.
(XEN) HVM: VMX enabled
(XEN) I/O virtualisation disabled
(XEN) Platform timer is 14.318MHz HPET
(XEN) Allocated console ring of 16 KiB.
*(XEN) Brought up 1 CPUs*
(XEN) *** LOADING DOMAIN 0 ***
(XEN) Xen kernel: 64-bit, lsb, compat32
(XEN) Dom0 kernel: 64-bit, lsb, paddr 0x2000 -> 0x6d5000
(XEN) PHYSICAL MEMORY ARRANGEMENT:
(XEN) Dom0 alloc.: 0000001000000000->0000001002000000 (459776 pages to be allocated)
(XEN) VIRTUAL MEMORY ARRANGEMENT:
(XEN) Loaded kernel: ffffffff80002000->ffffffff806d5000
(XEN) Init. ramdisk: ffffffff806d5000->ffffffff81038600
(XEN) Phys-Mach map: ffffea0000000000->ffffea0000392000
(XEN) Start info: ffffffff81039000->ffffffff810394b4
(XEN) Page tables: ffffffff8103a000->ffffffff81047000
(XEN) Boot stack: ffffffff81047000->ffffffff81048000
(XEN) TOTAL: ffffffff80000000->ffffffff81400000
(XEN) ENTRY ADDRESS: ffffffff80002000
(XEN) Dom0 has maximum 1 VCPUs
(XEN) Scrubbing Free RAM: .....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................done.
(XEN) Xen trace buffers: disabled
(XEN) Std. Loglevel: Errors and warnings
(XEN) Guest Loglevel: Nothing (Rate-limited: Errors and warnings)
(XEN) Xen is relinquishing VGA console.
(XEN) *** Serial input -> DOM0 (type 'CTRL-a' three times to switch input to Xen)
(XEN) Freed 168kB init memory.Edited by: 787931 on Feb 14, 2012 4:17 PM -
Should i Take the more expensive Mac mini (quad core) or dual core
Hey guys!
I don't now if I should take the Mac mini with dual core or quad core
I have never had a Mac so I don't now if the quad core (200$ more) is better than the dual core :o
I use it only for standard things (email, web, twitter Mac App Store games)
But it also should not stuck at bit more powerful apps and run crystal clear !!!
I want to have the Mac mini for few years !
Thanks now!The difference in real performance between dual core
and quad core machines is highly dependent on the
apps one uses and how many at the same time.
If you really only ever have one or perhaps two apps
open at once and if these apps are like web browsers
or email, you may never really notice a difference.
However, if you have many apps open at once or use
apps that can utilize many cores at the same time (typically
imaging and video apps), then there will be a significant
performance increase.
As far as gaming, by and large the most significant impact
on game performance is the graphics processing unit (GPU).
The integrated Intel HD4000 GPU in the Minis can typically
handle mid range games but will struggle on the very highend
games.
Also, if apps are not designed for mutiple core usage, there will be
now real improvement between 2 or 4 core machines. As a matter
of fact, I have a few apps that are faster on my MBP 13" 2.7 GHz
2 core i7 than on my quad core i7 2.0 GHz Mini Server for this
very reason.
So, the bottom line is that for some a quad core machine will
blow away a dual core machine while for others, there will be
no noticable difference. -
Envy 17-j050ex is it quad core or dual core
Hello,
the HP envy-j050ex. in the specs page of the link below mentioned that it's processor is dual core.
http://www8.hp.com/sa/en/products/laptops/product-detail.html?oid=5399952#!tab=specs
and @ intel website they said that the processor intel-core-I7-4702MQ is 4 cores per 8 threads in the link below.
http://ark.intel.com/products/75119/Intel-Core-i7-4702MQ-Processor-6M-Cache-up-to-3_20-GHz
i saw the device in the local store, i like it, but this issue makes me confused i need to know.
please check this issue for me.
Thanks in advance,
Best regards,
Eng. Mohamed Salah
Mechatronics Engineer
00966 561494449
[email protected]Hi,
Intel® Core™ i7-4702MQ is a quad-core processor. And your link shows 4 cores - quad is 4. By the way a Q also means Quad.
Regards.
BH
**Click the KUDOS thumb up on the left to say 'Thanks'**
Make it easier for other people to find solutions by marking a Reply 'Accept as Solution' if it solves your problem. -
Quad core vs Dual core, and Inel graphics
Hi all,
I’m trying to decide between a 2012 quad core 2.3GHz i7 and a 2014 dual core 2.6GHz i5. Yes, I wish they had a 2014 quad core Haswell with upgradeable RAM and a second HD bay like the 2012, plus a faster clock speed and Iris Pro graphics, but they don’t.
The main differences I see are listed below. I didn’t list the soldered on RAM in the 2014 because I’d be ordering it maxed out with 16GB of RAM. The same with the 2012; I’d be buying and installing 16GB of RAM. So in that respect, they’re even. And price comes out about the same, $900.
2012 Quad 2.3 i7 vs 2014 Dual 2.6 i5
2012 Ivy Bridge quad vs 2014 Haswell dual with slightly faster single core scores
Intel 4000 graphics vs Iris (5100)
FireWire vs 2nd ThunderBolt 2 port
Mavericks capable vs Yosemite
802.11n Wi-Fi vs ac
I’m decided on 3-4-5. My main questions deal with cores and graphics.
Question 1 is about cores. I’ve read from some people on other sites that for my low level use (email, MS Office, browsing, Youtube) I won’t even be accessing the extra cores on the quad, and that the unmaxed dual cores with a faster clock speed and Haswell CPU should actually work faster in my situation. So that’s my question. Is that true? And is that likely to hold true in the future with the trend in apps related to my usage (the quad core should still be “unnecessary” in the next 5 years or so, given my usage)?
Question 2 is about the graphics. I’ve read wildly different estimates as to how much faster Iris is than the 4000 (anywhere from about 10% to 90%). Anyone know how much difference I’m likely to see between the two, given my usage? And is that likely to hold true in the future with the trend in apps related to my usage (higher graphics intensive apps playing that much better on Iris compared to 4000, again, given my usage)?
I’m trying to buy for now, but I tend to keep my Macs for 6-7 years, so I’m also trying to look at the future.
Any benchmarks, facts or educated opinions are welcome.
Thanks!Kappy wrote:
All other things being equal 4-cores are twice as fast as 2-cores. This is regardless of what you are doing. The only way a 2-core processor would be as fast is if it were run at twice the clock speed. But the 2-core CPU is only clocked around 10% or so faster. Now, for all that you claim you will be doing the relevant question is do you need 4-cores. My answer is that you don't. But the 2-core machine will be slower - all things being equal.
Iris is a far better GPU than HD4 or 5000. But not as fast as a discreet GPU with better performance measures. Again, you don't really need high-power GPU. Iris should meet your needs adequately for now.
But remember you want to keep the computer for 6 or 7 years. No one knows what your needs will be then. You may find whatever you buy today that meets today's needs will be inadequate for tomorrow's.
Your comments on graphics pretty much confirm the majority of what I've been reading on other sites.
The conflict is with cores. About half the people are saying for low CPU intensive tasks 4 cores are totally unnecessary, while the other half says they'll make things faster no what the task (one thing all seem to have in common is they're totally against the 2014s).
So it seems I'm left with the decision between faster performance vs better graphics.
I appreciate your input. -
Is the iphone 5 a quad core or dual core?
The subject line says it all. Anyone know the answer yet? If it's a dual core how is it better than the A5X in the iPad 3?
Confirmed: http://crave.cnet.co.uk/mobiles/iphone-5-what-we-didnt-get-50009172/
Also the quote Apple gave about the iPhone 5 being the slimmest smartphone is incorrect:
http://androidandme.com/2012/09/smartphones-2/the-iphone-5-unveiled-as-the-world s-thinner-smartphone-or-not/ -
i dont know which computer to chose. should it be quad core with 2.5 ghz or dual core i3 with 3.2 ghz?
There is so much more beyond just the CPU too - such as graphics chipset. Again, it all depends on the usage scenarios. Some workloads don't parallelize well, so work better on a higher-clocked but lower core count CPU. Others parallelize well and are better on a quad-core.
*disclaimer* I am not now, nor have I ever been, an employee of Best Buy, Geek Squad, nor of any of their affiliate, parent, or subsidiary companies. -
Disco Plus Single Core v Dual Core
Discoverer Plus on a Quad/Dual Core processor machine has severe performance issues.
We've tested it against a machine with less RAM but single porcessor and is so quicker on the single core...
Any ideas?Hi
On a client machine, there are known issues with hyper-threading which is using machines that have multiple cores. If you are using Discoverer 10.1.2 these issues have been fixed. I would advise you to patch up your Discoverer server to 10.1.2.2 using cumulative patch 6.
I have placed a posting concerning patches on my blog which you may find useful:
http://learndiscoverer.blogspot.com/2008/04/most-useful-patch-numbers.html
Best wishes
Michael -
Quad Core Versus Dual Core on a Mac
I am going to upgrade to one of the new 27 inch iMacs. I use CS4 Premium Design Suite, PS, IL, ID and a little bit of DW. Does anyone have a comment or thought on any real benefit to a Quad Core processor? Do any of these apps support the multi threading that makes use of quad core technology? The little bit of research I have found on the internet suggests that there is not any significant performance improvement with the current software such as CS3 and CS4. The exceptions seem (and only seem) to be with some CAD applications and high end video editing.
Any input or factual data would be greatly appreciated.
FloydMark, I know what paid for my G5 Tower compared to what I can get from the new iMacs is incredible.
I do ad layouts in Illustrator, sometimes very large layouts 6 feet by 4 feet for menu boards. I use Photoshop extensively for pre layout work and for my own photography. I do a bit of video work but nothing major. I use either iMovie or Final Cut Express, again mostly simple stuff, not to much rendering.
I'm probably going to put 8 gig of ram, running Snow Leopard, For what I am comparing, the Quad machine is about $300 more the the Duo Core. The Quad processor speed is 2.66 ghz, the Duo Core processor is 3.06 ghz. so this is where it gets all muddy. Duo has faster processor but if the software I use does not have the "treading" capability to make use of the 4 cores than it seems that the duo is a better choice. Am I making proper sense out o this. It used to be so much easier to compare the options.. And no one seems to want to post a list of programs that truly benefit from Quad Core.
By the way I could care less about gaming benefits. -
Quad core vs dual core for motion
Hello all,
I'm just about to invest in a new Mac Pro, With the following specs
x1900 512 mb graphics card
3x 750 gbHDD (raid 2 at 3GBs and 256K bit) 1 independent
4 x 2gb memory
But I'm confused as it is wether spending the extra 600 pounds on going from a 3ghz DC to a quad core. I want to soup up my projects with motion graphics, in particular using 3D. How much more performance will the extra processing power give me. If anyone can give me a real time answer that'd be great.
I.E. how much more time will i spend waiting for it to render etc.
Thanks very much for all help, I really want to get this right before buying.
Cheers
Fred"...Motion uses the graphics card to do all its drawing, so while having a faster processor is always going to help, you will see much more improvement by getting the biggest baddest graphics card out there..."
But doesn't this only apply to the building - playing - interacting - tweaking aspect of using Motion in real-time? So while you're actually creating inside Motion, it's mostly GPU.
When you're finished inside Motion, I feel like you're going to implement the creation in one of two ways: Send it to FCP, where it's going to want to render - which falls back onto the CPU(s). Or you're going to export a self-contained movie from motion. Again, CPU, right? Or is there something I'm misunderstanding about how Motion functions under-the-hood?
If I'm wrong, then the Processors won't likely have a huge effect. But anytime it's time to actually render, I'd think you're bouncing back to CPU's again - not just GPU. In which case the Quad Core is going to help out.
Just thowing out some theories.... -
About Quad Core and Dual Core PowerMacG5
Hi everyone,
A guy is selling two Power Mac G5.
I'm not so familiar with these G5 line-up, and i'm asking for help.
He send me pictures, he took pictures of both Power Mac's from inside.
In one of them was written only G5 (like this:
Another one was written G5 two times(like this:
So can anyone help me which one is the Quad Core 2.5GHz? And is this Two Processor one from Late 2005 or older?
Respect, Leon.Hi Leon, if he doesn't know...
Find the Serial# & use it on one of these sites, but don't post the Serial# here...
http://www.chipmunk.nl/klantenservice/applemodel.html
http://www.appleserialnumberinfo.com/Desktop/index.php
How to find the serial number of your Apple hardware product...
http://support.apple.com/kb/HT1349 -
How to run two thread parallel y on two cores of dual-core ??
I want to run two threads on two cores ???
is there any package which support parallel computing??
can we do this by using java.util.concurrency pakage??
Thanks you
please Reply.....vikram_p wrote:
I want to run two threads on two cores ???ok
Threads are automatically spread over the available cores, as the OS sees fit.
is there any package which support parallel computing??Java does so without any external libraries.
can we do this by using java.util.concurrency pakage??yes
One question mark per question is plenty, thank you.
Maybe you are looking for
-
Want to know a T code which generates report of pending capitalisation by project no ( not wbs element level as in cjic ). Can any body help ?
-
Due list for Billing type: IV on VF04
Hi Experts, Please give your suggestion for the below issue on VF04. 1. My scenario : STO between two plants Purchase order->Delivery-> Billing (JEX-Profoma Invoice)-> J1IIN (Excise Invoice). The scenaio is ended in Excise Invoice (J1IIN) with refere
-
Hi, My Nokia account is blocked. Plz help me.
-
AET for CRM 7 not defaulting in the Package...[RESOLVED]
We introduced a new config/development client several weeks back and now all development/config takes place in client 010 rather than client 100. However, today is the first time that I have needed to use the AET tool to create a new field. When doin
-
Error Exporting Single data form LCM
Hi, When i try to migrate specific data form it gives me this error "EPMLCM-37061: Listing has no entries" Any help. Regards.