Process flow for subsequent debit/credit

Hi,
How to proceed for following scenario
user had booked invoice using MIRO,later vendor sent one credit note for that booked invoice and po of SAP.
how to impact this credit note for the existing invoioce verification in sap using subsequent credit/debit.
plz send me step-by step process.

Hi Charan,
Has vendor sent you a credit memo or a subsequent credit?
Usually a credit memo refers to a goods return and a subsequent credit to a prior invoice that was set with a higher price than it should (for example).
So you can simply make a credit memo against the PO with the value/quantity in the vendor credit paper.
Go to MIRO and choose transaction 2 Credit memo, insert the original PO and adjust value/quantity. After saving the document the PO / Stock and value are updated.
Regards.

Similar Messages

Subsequent Debit/Credit for Freight Costs

Is it possible to configure additional indicators for subsequent debit/credit specifically to capture freight costs that would then flow those costs down to the material? What is the proper process for this activity?

Hello
For subsequent cost accounting, the Process Trip Cost Accounting could be helpful.
Check the link
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_46c/helpdata/EN/b7/c44bc19d5411d189b60000e829fbbd/content.htm
Reg
Suresh

Subsequent Debit/Credit Number Range

Dear Experts,
My client want seperate number range for Subsequent Debit/Credit in MIRO..
how can i can do this .....
Thanx
Neeru

Hi Neeru,
This is impossible in std, but SAP provides the enhancement LMR1M003 for this purpose (trs SMOD/CMOD). The subsequent D/C indicator is provided in the field E_TRBKPV-TBTKZ.
Note however that the flag for subsequent D/C can be set in individual items, even though the whole document is a normal invoice/credit note, field T_DRSEG-TBTKZ.
BR
Raf

Billing Document Subsequent debit/ credit:

Dear SAP Experts,
I am in search of the Document type (Sales) , though which there can be subsequent debit credit to the billing document (Which is already posted to accounting) and the new accounting document should be created with the invoice reference as the Acc. Document of the original billing Doc:
Such as:
BIlling DOc. No : 90666767 (F2)        Accounting Dcou: 22000089789 (RV)
Next Subsequent Credit :   Billing document (F2)
Accounting Document 220056537292 (DZ)    But in the INV. Ref: there should be 22000089789
Please advice.
I have tried the INVOICE Correction Request (RK) But it generates RV doc Type in accounting and Invoice reference is not Present.
Regards,
A S

Dear SAP Consultant,
If, I have understood correctly, This is because,
Accounting Document 220056537292 (DZ) is your Collection-Document (DZ - is Collection Doc.type against Billing Doc. Type - BL) against your BIlling DOc. No : 90666767 (F2)
For Billing Doc-types, Check with: VOFA
Best Regards,
Amit.
Note: I was not clear with your doubt, while replying, so if its not related to your query, Please excuse.

Regarding Subsequent debit,credit and cdedit memos

Hello Gurus,
Could any body explain the above said subject and when this scenario will be used pls give some examples.
regards
rk

Hi,
A subsequent debit/credit arises if a transaction has already been settled, and a further invoice or credit memo is received afterwards.
A subsequent debit/credit changes the total invoice value of a purchase order item; the total invoice quantity remains unchanged. Therefore, only a value-based update of the purchasing transaction takes place. There is no quantity-based
update.
1. Subsequent Debit :-You must enter an invoice as a subsequent debit if a purchase order item has already been invoiced and further costs are now incurred. (Example: A vendor has inadvertently invoiced you at too low a price and then sends a
second invoice for the difference.)
2. Subsequent Credit :- You must enter a credit memo as a subsequent credit if a purchase order item was invoiced at too high a price and you have now received a credit memo. (Example: A vendor has inadvertently invoiced you at too high a price and then sends a credit memo for the difference.)
If you enter a subsequent debit/credit, the system suggests the entire invoiced quantity, but no value. The maximum quantity that you can subsequently debit or credit is the quantity that has already been invoiced. You can only enter a subsequent debit/credit for a purchase order item if an invoice has already been posted for this item.
A subsequent debit/credit cannot refer to a particular invoice.
Subsequent debits and credits are listed separately in the PO history.
3. Credit Memo :- You usually receive a credit memo from a vendor if you were overcharged. As is the case for invoices, credit memos refer to purchase orders or goods receipts.
You post a credit memo if too large an amount has been invoiced. When you post the credit memo, the total invoiced quantity in the PO history is reduced by the credit memo quantity. The maximum quantity you can make a credit for is the quantity that has already been invoiced.
In the same way as the corresponding goods receipt is expected or posted for the invoice, in the case of a credit memo, the system assumes that the credit memo belongs to a return delivery or reversal of the goods receipt. This means that the credit memo is settled using the GR/IR clearing account.
Regards,
Pardeep Malik

Subsequent debit, credit and credit memo

Hi,
what is the difference between subsequent debit, credit and credit memo in MIRO transaction.
In case of vendor had given us credit note with relevant to particular for which we had already completed the invoice verification and payment also paid.
in this case what document should i use i.e crdit memo, subsequent credit memo or subsequent debit memo??
plz suggest

Hi
You need to use a credit memo.
Subsequent debit is used if you have already invoiced
You have already received an invoice from your vendor for all the goods received. Subsequently, freight costs are to be taken into account, however, the invoice quantity remains the same.
Subsequent credit is used if you already have done a credit memo on the PO
You have already received a credit memo from your vendor for all the goods received. Subsequently, freight costs are to be credited to your company, however, the credit memo quantity remains the same.
Thanks & Regards
Kishore

Subsequent debit/credit

Hi,
to all SAP Guru,
Account Postings Made when an Invoice Is Posted as a Subsequent Debit:
PO- 100 Piece @ 10 Rs
GR- 50 Piece
Invoice 70 Piece @ 11 Rs == 770 Rs
Invoice for Rs 105 for 70 Pieces (Subsequent Debit).
At GR:-
Stock Account- 500+
GR/IR Account- 500-
At invoice-
Stock account- 50+
GR/IR account- 720+
Vendor Account- 770-
Subsequent Debit-
Stock Account- 75+
GR/IR Account- 30+
Vendor Account- 105-
So my question is
At Invoice- How stock account Dr.with 50, GR/IR Dr. with 720 Came........
& At Subsequent Debit- How Stock Account Dr.with 75, GR/IR Dr. with 30, came.....
plz sir/mam help me out..bcoz i always get confuse in account posting
And Same plz give me example of Subsequent Credit that how
Account Postings Made when an Invoice Is Posted as a Subsequent Credit:
plz........

At invoice-
Stock account- 50+
GR/IR account- 720+
Vendor Account- 770-
invoice price is 5 rs more than PO price, and you use moving average price so the additional price is hitting inventory account. If you use standard price, 50 will go to PRD account.
Subsequent Debit-
Stock Account- 75+
GR/IR Account- 30+
Vendor Account- 105-
If the quantity of the subsequent debit/credit is larger than the quantity delivered, the system distributes the relevant amount proportionally. The part of the subsequent debit/credit that does not have a goods receipt is posted to the GR/IR clearing account. The remaining amount is posted to the stock account u2013 or in the case of standard price control or insufficient stock coverage u2013 to a price difference account. picked from [http://help.sap.com/saphelp_46c/helpdata/en/a8/b99725452b11d189430000e829fbbd/content.htm]
In your case, system proportianately distributes the stock.. i.e 105/75 = 1.5.. you have stock of 50.. 50*1.5 = 75 which goes to stock account and the remaining goes the GR/IR clearing account. subsequent debit value 105 is credited with vendor account.. same happen in subsequent credit in a reverse way.

Basic process flow for bank account assignment to customers

Hi ,
please help,
I want to know the basic process flow for customer bank account creation and assignment process. I.e I had pass the customer details ,credit card information throw the oe_order_pub.proces_order() API .after this process ,how the bank account creation and updation process works?.
Give me the steps and API name for bank account creation.
Thanks
prabu

hi mnr,
this is my manual process flow.
BEGIN
l_header_rec := OE_ORDER_PUB.G_MISS_HEADER_REC;
l_header_rec.header_id := '100192';
l_header_rec.credit_card_holder_name := 'myname';
l_header_rec.credit_card_number := 'xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx1111';
l_header_rec.credit_card_expiration_date := '1-Jan-28';
l_header_rec.credit_card_code := 'VISA';
l_header_rec.payment_type_code := 'CREDIT_CARD';
l_header_rec.sold_to_org_id := '17118';
l_header_rec.credit_card_approval_code := '34545656676';
l_header_rec.operation := OE_GLOBALS.G_OPR_UPDATE;
OE_ORDER_PUB.process_order (p_api_version_number => 1.0
, p_init_msg_list => fnd_api.g_false
, p_return_values => fnd_api.g_false
, p_action_commit => fnd_api.g_false
, x_return_status => l_return_status
, x_msg_count => l_msg_count
, x_msg_data => l_msg_data
, p_header_rec => l_header_rec
, p_line_tbl => l_line_tbl
, p_action_request_tbl => l_action_request_tbl
x_header_rec => l_header_rec
, x_header_val_rec => x_header_val_rec
, x_Header_Adj_tbl => x_Header_Adj_tbl
, x_Header_Adj_val_tbl => x_Header_Adj_val_tbl
, x_Header_price_Att_tbl => x_Header_price_Att_tbl
, x_Header_Adj_Att_tbl => x_Header_Adj_Att_tbl
, x_Header_Adj_Assoc_tbl => x_Header_Adj_Assoc_tb
............etc );
after this process,i found duplicate customer bank account records in bank account screen .if am uses same values in two process. And it will never updates the exiting bank account . it is the standard oracle process or my mistake.
Thanks
prabu
Edited by: 861876 on Jun 21, 2011 11:06 PM

Price check during subsequent debit & credit

Hi experts,
My client wants a scenario which is enumerated below.
The client requirement is to have a tolerance level check during miro as well as subsequent debit & credit.
For the miro i have taken tolerance key PP: price variance with error message 083 & it is working fine for percenatge toleranace check i.e if the PO is made for 10 rs/unit & i have set upper & lower limit of tolerance of 10% system will not allow to do miro at price of more than 11 rs/unit or less than 9 rs/unit.
The problem i am facing is to activate the same check at the time of subsequent debit & credit i.e if somebody does a miro of 10 rs/unit & then does a subsequent debit to pay another 2 rs to the vendor the system is not giving an error message but actually the vendor is getting 12 rs/unit which is against norm. How do we check this thing so that system does not allow the same.
waiting for reply.

Hi all,
There is a new development. The error message is getting triggered for subsequent debit. That means if i have set a tolerance level of 10%,& initially received the invoice at a 10 rs/unit which is the PO price then system will not allow to do a subsequent debit for another 2 rs/unit ( by effectively making the price 12 rs/unit) as it falls outside the tolerance limit by throwing an error message.
But same error message is not getting effected for subsequent credit i.e after receiving the invoice for 10 rs/unit if i do a subsequent credit for 2 rs/unit then it is falling outside set tolearnce limit of +-10% ( by effectively making the price 8 rs/unit) but the system is not triggering any message.
Any idea whether it is a SAP default, that the message determination will trigger only for subsequent debit & not for subsequent credit.
waitng for reply.

Revaluation run (MRNB) v/s Subsequent Debit / Credit (MIRO)

Hello Experts
We are working on ECC 6.0.
I'am aware how to use MRNB & posting subsequent debit / credit note through MIRO.
I want to know when to use MRNB in comparison to Subsequent Debit / Credit?
Suppose vendor has suppiled certain goods at Rs 100 per unit. Invoice have already been posted against the GRs. Now the vendor asks for additional Rs. 2 per unit.
In such a scenario should MRNB or Subsequent credit is to be posted?
I've noticed that when MRNB is used material MAP remains unaffected unlike posting a Subsequent Credit / Debit. Why it remains unaffected during MRNB run? If the material price is changed then its impact should also come on inventory which doesnt happen in MRNB.
For both the cases is excise claiming to be adjusted through J1IH manually ?
Regards
Kapil

Hello,
Subsequent Debit and Credits
After an Invoice is successfully posted and the transaction is completed, Vendor approaches with additional amount invoice or correction in Invoice.You would like to post this additional invoice with reference to the original PO and item. Subsequent Debit / Credit functionality allows you to capture this difference without canceling original invoice.
Please check this link
http://help.sap.com/erp2005_ehp_03/helpdata/EN/a8/b99890452b11d189430000e829fbbd/frameset.htm
Regards,
Shailesh

Miro debit/credit note and subsequent debit/credit

Dear all,
May I know under what circumstances we use debit/credit note and
under what circumstances we use subsequent debit/credit
Need advice.
Thanks

Hi,
A subsequent debit/credit arises if a transaction has already been settled, and a further invoice or credit memo is received afterwards.
A subsequent debit/credit changes the total invoice value of a purchase order item; the total invoice quantity remains unchanged. Therefore, only a value-based update of the purchasing transaction takes place. There is no quantity-based
update.
1. Subsequent Debit :-You must enter an invoice as a subsequent debit if a purchase order item has already been invoiced and further costs are now incurred. (Example: A vendor has inadvertently invoiced you at too low a price and then sends a
second invoice for the difference.)
2. Subsequent Credit :- You must enter a credit memo as a subsequent credit if a purchase order item was invoiced at too high a price and you have now received a credit memo. (Example: A vendor has inadvertently invoiced you at too high a price and then sends a credit memo for the difference.)
If you enter a subsequent debit/credit, the system suggests the entire invoiced quantity, but no value. The maximum quantity that you can subsequently debit or credit is the quantity that has already been invoiced. You can only enter a subsequent debit/credit for a purchase order item if an invoice has already been posted for this item.
A subsequent debit/credit cannot refer to a particular invoice.
Subsequent debits and credits are listed separately in the PO history.
3. Credit Memo :- You usually receive a credit memo from a vendor if you were overcharged. As is the case for invoices, credit memos refer to purchase orders or goods receipts.
You post a credit memo if too large an amount has been invoiced. When you post the credit memo, the total invoiced quantity in the PO history is reduced by the credit memo quantity. The maximum quantity you can make a credit for is the quantity that has already been invoiced.
In the same way as the corresponding goods receipt is expected or posted for the invoice, in the case of a credit memo, the system assumes that the credit memo belongs to a return delivery or reversal of the goods receipt. This means that the credit memo is settled using the GR/IR clearing account.
Regards,
Pardeep Malik

Process flow for the Mid-year Status Changes based upon the Qualifying Even

Hi Experts,
I'm looking some information for the process flow for the Mid-year Status Changes based upon the Qualifying Events. Basically, I need to know, what would be the impact of these changes on various info types (Via IT0014 - Deduction changes & so forth) and the things that needs to be considered during it's Configuration and the things that needs to be checked due to the occurrence of the change. I would greatly appreciate any kind of help/document.
Thanks a bunch in advance,
Thanks,
Exertive.

Hello guys,
Can anyone has any kind of input on this? Basically, I need to know the procees for Mid-year status changes based upon Qualified events. Any kind of help is greatly appreciated.
Thanks,
Exertive.

Process Flow for Normal Correction

Hi All
I am searching for a process flow for a normal correction. In specific I need to know who does what in terms of crating transports and releasing transports. I need to have a guide on the entire process as well as the status that the relevent parties change it to. For more info please let me know.
Santosh

Hi friend,
This is answer to all your queries concerned.*need S-user for this
https://websmp106.sap-ag.de/~sapidb/011000358700000086572008E.sim
Pls assign pts and can close the thread.

Process Flow for Subcontracting

I need help in the process flow for Subcontracting
With Regards
Maya

Please have a look at the building block '442 RFQs for Project-based Procurement' and '443 Purchase Orders for Project-based Procurement' of the SAP Best Practices for Engineering, Construction, and Operations SAP Best Practices for Engineering, Construction, and Operations U.S - V1.604 (SAP Best Practices for Engineering, Construction, and Operations – SAP Help Portal Page).
Best regards,
Maria

Business Process Flow for old records

A customer has asked us to decommission the Business Process Flow for a particular security role.
I have done this and all is well for new records.
Unfortunately the Process Bar still appears for old Leads. I think I can understand the behaviour: if you change the process, the old records will still show process bar that existed at the time they were created. This includes removing it presumably.
My question is, can I remove the legacy instances of the process bar either through the interface or by code?

Update: I created a command line to update the stageid and processid to NULL.
These fields are now clear, however when I open an affected record the form pops up an error message:
Unhandled Exception: System.ServiceModel.FaultException`1[[Microsoft.Xrm.Sdk.OrganizationServiceFault, Microsoft.Xrm.Sdk, Version=7.0.0.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=31bf3856ad364e35]]: Cannot insert duplicate key.Detail:
<OrganizationServiceFault xmlns:i="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns="http://schemas.microsoft.com/xrm/2011/Contracts">
<ErrorCode>-2147220937</ErrorCode>
<ErrorDetails xmlns:d2p1="http://schemas.datacontract.org/2004/07/System.Collections.Generic" />
<Message>Cannot insert duplicate key.</Message>
<Timestamp>2015-02-19T14:37:12.1391627Z</Timestamp>
<InnerFault i:nil="true" />
<TraceText>
[Microsoft.Crm.ObjectModel: Microsoft.Crm.ObjectModel.GlobalActiveStagePlugin]
[bb48066e-f22f-412f-a530-91f72e4b859b: GlobalActiveStagePlugin]
</TraceText>
</OrganizationServiceFault>
I can see that the Process Bar is still showing.
Is there something else I would need to do?
Gordon

Process flow for subsequent debit/credit

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for