Process of costing

hi.....
i want to know all about process for cost of goods sold,cost of manufacture,cost of production.
Thanks & Regards
Rekha sharma

For frozen standard cost (both legal frozen standard and profit center standard), maintaining planning costing sheets are used
KZZ2 (Percentage Overhead Type/Plant) and
KZM2 (Quantity Overhead Type/Plant)
Both [' will pickup when processing standard cost estimate']
The prerequisites are first check the following:
MM03 - check material standard price
CS03 - check material BOM
CA23 - check Rate Routing
KP27/KP26 - check/update Production Activity Type Price

Similar Messages

Process Order Cost Analysis Target and Actual Quantity Missing

This is related to Process order costing .
Issue : Before activating Material Update field in Costing view 1 of Material master , we have created few process orders and Delivered .
Hence cost analysis shows Actual and target cost fields Empty in COST ANALYSIS report of order . After Updating field in Material master , New Process orders are calculated with Actual and Target cost .
Solution needed : How to do Actual and Target cost estimation back in cost analysis report for old process orders which are created before Material Update field ?

You have deleted the Component in the BoM.
Then you have created a production order, check if the start date of this order is after the date change in the BoM..... Can be that the component stills exists in the order ? Have you tried deleting the compoent in the order BoM ?

Control Costs not Displayed in Process Order Cost Reports

Hi
After Variance calculation and settlement of Process Orders also COntrol COst appearing as Zero, is there any step I am missing or any configuration needs to be adjusted?
Thanks in Advance
Regards
Venkat

Hi,
I checked in IDES system as well, there also using standard settings control costs are not getting updated on the process orders.
I couldn't makeout how the control costs fields get updated in the process order cost reports
Regards
Venkat

Planning Process of Costing Sheets - Standard Cost Estimate

Can some one please explain which planning values costing sheets will pickup when processing standard cost estimate
Thanks.

For frozen standard cost (both legal frozen standard and profit center standard), maintaining planning costing sheets are used
KZZ2 (Percentage Overhead Type/Plant) and
KZM2 (Quantity Overhead Type/Plant)
Both [' will pickup when processing standard cost estimate']
The prerequisites are first check the following:
MM03 - check material standard price
CS03 - check material BOM
CA23 - check Rate Routing
KP27/KP26 - check/update Production Activity Type Price

Import Process - Translate costs to row material inventory

We need to define our internal Import Process of row materials
currently we imports material and entry to inventory, without
the nationalization costs,and free charge of nationalization (customs, transportation, etc. ..)
, these costs and expenses are recorded separately
because different vendors are also .
There is also the reality that the product reaches the
floor and you need to enter a stock for the final product
assembly, and the actual values of costs are known a week later.
We need to implement a process in sap as simple as possible to
allow us to have real and current cost of our materials in
inventory. and pay to our differents process´s suppliers
I could detail step by step how serious this process?

Hi,
currently we imports material and entry to inventory, without
the nationalization costs,and free charge of nationalization (customs, transportation, etc. ..)
, these costs and expenses are recorded separately
because different vendors are also .
first thing there is no relation between different vendor and inventory,eventhogh you have different vendor in condition tab you can inventoried duty if you want
Please try understand basic of import PO
as you know there are total 7 custom condition out of which 3 condition value add in material master( in this case you have different vendor in custom condition)
check following link and revert back if any issue
[Import PO procedure..?;
[http://www.sap-img.com/materials/procedure-for-import-po-and-duty.htm]
Regards
Kailas Ugale

Easy Cost Planning: Calculation Row (Business Process) in Cost Model Derivation Rule

Hi All,
The Requirement:
Using the Cost Model I am able to do up to Sub-Total Value. I tried with Calculation Row (Business Process) in the Cost Model Derivation Rule, but could not succeed.
I tried with Base Planning Object, but the formulas are different for other scenarios. Which require 5 to 6 Base Planning Objects are required to be created to get the total amount for a single line item, in the construction project there will be more than 10,000 line items and it is very difficult to maintain the data and also it is time consuming.
Can you suggest me, how to map the requirement?
Best Regards,
K. Rajendra Prasad Rao

You need to check the following for the material cost to appear in network costing:
1. Check whether costing variant is assigned to the network or not.
2. Check whether costing relevancy indicator is checked in material component assigned to the network.
3. If costing variant exists, check the valuation variant and strategy sequence for material valuation.
4. Go to the material master and see whether price is mentioned or not.
I would suggest you to use Network costing, Also note network costing are recorded in Co version '0' so if you have maintained your ECP for '0' version, there is a chance of both the costing getting added up.
Edited by: Ahmed Rifaee on Mar 28, 2010 10:10 PM

HCM Processes & Forms Cost Assignments Defaults

Hello Everyone,
I have a question about making Cost Assignments for Infotyps like "Additional Payment" (0015) or "Employee Remuneration Info" (2010) within a Processes and Forms Scenario. This is really a huge requirement for us because the hole Company is split in several subsidiaries so we need to book the costs to different cost objects.
In the Backend World (PA30/PA61) when creating a record for either one of the Infotypes I can choose the Option "Maintain cost assignment" so I can define a different cost object where the costs of the created record should be booked.
I know the data of the cost assignment get's stored in the tables ASSHR & ASSOB. But as I'm using the SAP Backend Services SAP_PA and SAP_PT I can't make any DB update/insert statments after the records are created.
Did anyone implemented a Scenario like this before?
Would be awesome if someone could give me an advise.
Best regards,
Tobias

If the infotypes in question are standard PD infotypes you could use SAP_PD service to update them.
For any other tables you will have to go with a advanced generic service or do the update in a background workflow task.
Refer here to the post by Christopher Solomon's Profile | SCN: http://scn.sap.com/community/erp/hcm/blog/2012/08/20/hcm-processes-forms-when-all-else-failsadvanced-generic-services
Hope this helps.
Regards.

Process Order Costing

Hi Guru's,
I am having problem that when my process order gets confirmed the values of production are not updated in the cost center, what i done wrong, pls provide me solution.
Thanks & Regards,
Karad D D

Pls help me in this

Process Order Costing by proportion

Hi All ,
We used t-code : CORZ to record operation start and end time , base on the duration to calcaute the production cost
In our industry , the processing normally will take quite longer , most of case over the month
Let's say , the operation start from middle of this month and will finish end of next month
We found out the issue the cost related to activities linked to that operations are only declared when the operation is finished
is there any way can setup the cost calcuation base on the period proportion ? for example 40% from last month , 60% from current month ?
Thanks for the advising !
Denny

Hi,
You can use the WIP settlement option for order settlement.
For this process you have to confirm the operations partially at the time you want to do the settlement. For example you have started one order in mid of month i.e. 15th & you want to settle it on end of month i.e. 30th. You have to carry out partial confirmation & WIP settlement. System will take the costs based on the partially confirmed activites.
Please discuss it with your CO consultant for controlling part of this process.
Hope this will help you.
Regards,
Navin

Process Industries Costing

Hi,
I am new to SAP, Implementing PPPI module for Process Industry. I have the following requirement,
Our Client Producing Oil as Finished along with 4 additional products. In that 3 products they will sold and 1 product they use for Internal purpose. So I consider 3 product as a Co product and 1 is Byproduct.
1. In the Finished Product Material master I maintained Co Product Apportionment structure. In that Apportionment structure I have idea of maintaining the Material cost proportion for finished and co product. But additionally we have the option for production cost and overhead cost. How can I maintain these cost. Is there any special setting need?
2. How can I map the By product costing.
Experts please help me.
Regards,
M25111979

Hi Pradeep,
Sorry for the late reply.
I have the following doubt,
1. We can maintain Material cost, Production cost, Overhead cost proportion for Header and Co product material in the same apportionment structure. If I maintain the same means during cost estimation I got only the Material cost proportion only not the production and overhead cost proportion.
2. In our scenario we have by product. How the cost calculation taking place, Is there any special settings required. How the By product cost taking place?
Can you please explain in details regarding the above queries.
Regards,
M25111979.

Process OrderBalance Cost

Dear All
We have Some Process order with balance Cost, Price control V is used situation is this many time we are not able to settle order as inventory movement is very fast when we check order to settle on next day we are not having that quantity in stock as it already dispatched. so we dnt want to settle those order with balance cost.
Can i close mm period and FI and CO period wit balance cost in order.
if i do same what will be implecation on system.

What happens to the $$ of material consumed in order, if you are not settling?
If the accountants are satisfied with the dollar flow, you should be able to:
Try Transaction OKO7 - change the Settlement proile from "to be settled in full" to "can Be settled"
the order can then be closed with a balance on it.
Be sure to immediatly revert the settlement profile

Solaris 10 Process Creation Cost (SMP)

Hey there,
I'm writing a authentication adapter for an inhouse application in C.
The first throwaway - prototype forks a child and execs a shell script which uses the solaris ldapsearch utility to query an AD controller.
An alternative would be to implement the whole logic in the adapter itself. This way no new processes get forked.
The nice thing about the script - way is, that I get configurability and easy debugging for free.
The bad thing is that at ~2 Additional Processes get craeated for each user that logins.
~400 users with similiar usage patterns over the day, peak between at 8.00 - 10.00 I guess.
Now the question: Besides the cpu & memory resources each process needs, are there any solaris / sun hw - specific issues to take into account?
I heard horror stories about cpu cross - calls halting all the n cpus while a process gets created and similar things.
Linux is / was known for a pretty low process creation overhead. How's Solaris doing in this field?
Thanks for any hints / pointers whatever
Regards Robert

Well, since you asked....
I benchmarked the exact same machine, once under Linux (Fedora Core 7 with a vanilla kernel) and once under Solaris (Solaris 10 125101-10). The machine used is based on a Tyan Tiger MP motherboard (AMD760MPX chipset) with 2 Athlon MP2400+ CPU's and 2GB DDR memory. The HD used under Solaris is an 80GB Seagate Barracuda running on the AMD chipset's ATA100 bus, and the filesystem is UFS with logging. The Linux install is running off of a pair of 250GB Seagate Barracudas connected to a Promise SATA300+4 controller (which I am in the process of writing a Solaris driver for). The filesystem is ext3 on a mirrored volume. Compilation on both systems were performed with GCC4.2.1 using identical compiler flags, and bash was the default shell on both systems.
Here's the Linux results:
BYTE UNIX Benchmarks (Version 4.1.0)
System -- Linux defiant 2.6.22.1 #1 SMP PREEMPT Sun Aug 5 16:34:04 MST 2007 i686 athlon i386 GNU/Linux
Start Benchmark Run: Mon Aug 27 20:43:40 MST 2007
1 interactive users.
20:43:40 up 3 min, 1 user, load average: 1.20, 0.83, 0.34
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 4 2007-08-05 04:07 /bin/sh -> bash
/bin/sh: symbolic link to `bash'
                      227873832 116041816 100069944 54% /
Dhrystone 2 using register variables     5778801.2 lps   (10.0 secs, 10 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone                 1681.3 MWIPS (10.0 secs, 10 samples)
System Call Overhead                     813180.9 lps   (10.0 secs, 10 samples)
Pipe Throughput                          415162.7 lps   (10.0 secs, 10 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching              64908.7 lps   (10.0 secs, 10 samples)
Process Creation                           6424.4 lps   (30.0 secs, 3 samples)
Execl Throughput                           1421.4 lps   (29.9 secs, 3 samples)
File Read 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks    282682.0 KBps (30.0 secs, 3 samples)
File Write 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks   197633.0 KBps (30.0 secs, 3 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks    113833.0 KBps (30.0 secs, 3 samples)
File Read 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks      140090.0 KBps (30.0 secs, 3 samples)
File Write 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks      84382.0 KBps (30.0 secs, 3 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks       50505.0 KBps (30.0 secs, 3 samples)
File Read 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks    384206.0 KBps (30.0 secs, 3 samples)
File Write 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks   305153.0 KBps (30.0 secs, 3 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks    164475.0 KBps (30.0 secs, 3 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)               2355.7 lpm   (60.0 secs, 3 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)                458.3 lpm   (60.0 secs, 3 samples)
Shell Scripts (16 concurrent)               236.0 lpm   (60.0 secs, 3 samples)
Arithmetic Test (type = short)           376603.4 lps   (10.0 secs, 3 samples)
Arithmetic Test (type = int)             397807.5 lps   (10.0 secs, 3 samples)
Arithmetic Test (type = long)            391745.4 lps   (10.0 secs, 3 samples)
Arithmetic Test (type = float)           783164.0 lps   (10.0 secs, 3 samples)
Arithmetic Test (type = double)          786266.0 lps   (10.0 secs, 3 samples)
Arithoh                                       0.0 lps   (10.0 secs, 3 samples)
C Compiler Throughput                       460.0 lpm   (60.0 secs, 3 samples)
Dc: sqrt(2) to 99 decimal places          42626.4 lpm   (30.0 secs, 3 samples)
Recursion Test--Tower of Hanoi            99086.0 lps   (20.0 secs, 3 samples)
                    INDEX VALUES            TEST         BASELINE     RESULT      INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables        116700.0 5778801.2      495.2
Double-Precision Whetstone                      55.0     1681.3      305.7
Execl Throughput                                43.0     1421.4      330.6
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks         3960.0   113833.0      287.5
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks           1655.0    50505.0      305.2
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks         5800.0   164475.0      283.6
Pipe Throughput                              12440.0   415162.7      333.7
Process Creation                               126.0     6424.4      509.9
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)                     6.0      458.3      763.8
System Call Overhead                         15000.0   813180.9      542.1
                                                                =========
    FINAL SCORE                                                     392.9Here are the Solaris results:
BYTE UNIX Benchmarks (Version 4.1.0)
System -- SunOS defiant 5.10 Generic_125101-10 i86pc i386 i86pc
Start Benchmark Run: Monday, August 27, 2007 9:50:37 PM MST
   4 interactive users.
    9:50pm up 10 min(s), 1 user, load average: 0.16, 0.17, 0.13
lrwxrwxrwx   1 root     root           4 Aug 27 21:49 /bin/sh -> bash
/bin/sh:      ELF 32-bit LSB executable 80386 Version 1, dynamically linked, stripped
/dev/dsk/c1d0s0      16525422 13567043 2793125    83%    /
Dhrystone 2 using register variables     5209324.3 lps   (10.0 secs, 10 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone                 1677.5 MWIPS (10.0 secs, 10 samples)
System Call Overhead                     562730.0 lps   (10.0 secs, 10 samples)
Pipe Throughput                          573459.5 lps   (10.0 secs, 10 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching              32378.9 lps   (10.0 secs, 10 samples)
Process Creation                            964.9 lps   (30.0 secs, 3 samples)
Execl Throughput                            493.8 lps   (29.9 secs, 3 samples)
File Read 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks    270440.0 KBps (30.0 secs, 3 samples)
File Write 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks   164019.0 KBps (30.0 secs, 3 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks     86882.0 KBps (30.0 secs, 3 samples)
File Read 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks      138906.0 KBps (30.0 secs, 3 samples)
File Write 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks      87541.0 KBps (30.0 secs, 3 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks       44631.0 KBps (30.0 secs, 3 samples)
File Read 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks    348029.0 KBps (30.0 secs, 3 samples)
File Write 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks   214112.0 KBps (30.0 secs, 3 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks    119302.0 KBps (30.0 secs, 3 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)                578.7 lpm   (60.0 secs, 3 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)                112.7 lpm   (60.0 secs, 3 samples)
Shell Scripts (16 concurrent)                57.0 lpm   (60.0 secs, 3 samples)
Arithmetic Test (type = short)           391136.1 lps   (10.0 secs, 3 samples)
Arithmetic Test (type = int)             407158.5 lps   (10.0 secs, 3 samples)
Arithmetic Test (type = long)            407443.4 lps   (10.0 secs, 3 samples)
Arithmetic Test (type = float)           837535.1 lps   (10.0 secs, 3 samples)
Arithmetic Test (type = double)          837482.8 lps   (10.0 secs, 3 samples)
Arithoh                                       0.0 lps   (10.0 secs, 3 samples)
C Compiler Throughput                       617.7 lpm   (60.0 secs, 3 samples)
Dc: sqrt(2) to 99 decimal places          14656.0 lpm   (30.0 secs, 3 samples)
Recursion Test--Tower of Hanoi           100918.0 lps   (20.0 secs, 3 samples)
                     INDEX VALUES
TEST                                        BASELINE     RESULT      INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables        116700.0 5209324.3      446.4
Double-Precision Whetstone                      55.0     1677.5      305.0
Execl Throughput                                43.0      493.8      114.8
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks         3960.0    86882.0      219.4
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks           1655.0    44631.0      269.7
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks         5800.0   119302.0      205.7
Pipe Throughput                              12440.0   573459.5      461.0
Pipe-based Context Switching                  4000.0    32378.9       80.9
Process Creation                               126.0      964.9       76.6
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)                     6.0      112.7      187.8
System Call Overhead                         15000.0   562730.0      375.2
                                                                 =========
     FINAL SCORE                                                     211.7You can see that Linux is much faster than Solaris when it comes to process creation. Linux has traditionally had a pretty lightweight process creation. Solaris process creation is slower, although it doesn't seem to be "heavy". I ran 20 concurrent instances of "spawn" (the benchmark for process creation) under Solaris and despite 100% CPU usage the system was completely responsive. The creation of processes didn't monopolize the CPUs if other processes needed to run. It is also interesting to note that no matter whether I run one instance or many instances of spawn the total number of processes created per second is always around 900ish. This suggests to me that the processes are spending most of their time waiting on mutexes. The locks are no doubt adaptive, so at least one creation thread is spinning if it can, which causes the high CPU utilization. Nevertheless, the scheduler will make sure that any other processes that need CPU time get it regardless.
What this boils down to is that a lot of concurrent process creation isn't going to make much impact on system performance despite the high usage reported by top. It also means that, unless you need to create more than several hundred processes per second you should be fine. Linux might be able to create six times as many processes per second, but not when those processes actually want CPU cycles. Finally, keep in mind that Solaris is more thread-centric, and thread creation on any system is always cheaper than process creation.
This is what top reads as I type this (I also opened Sun Studio, just to add some load to the system):
load averages: 32.16, 21.47, 17.61                                     20:33:19
144 processes: 105 sleeping, 28 running, 8 zombie, 1 stopped, 2 on cpu
CPU states: 0.0% idle, 7.7% user, 92.3% kernel, 0.0% iowait, 0.0% swap
Memory: 1791M real, 1039M free, 808M swap in use, 2670M swap freeI don't even notice it. So, unless making the LDAP calls are extremely processor intensive I would say you should be fine.

DP91 Error message - unable to complete billing process - incorrect Cost El

A Goods Issue was created for WBS Element 2008066-MO using the wrong GL Account number (635010)- when we attempted to run DP91 for the Invoice we received a hard stop error. We have no way of backing out the incorrect Good Issue and therefore cannot generate a project invoice. What can we do? Attachment (DP91 Error)
Can any body help. it is urgent....
Edited by: Jaydeep Shah on Nov 4, 2008 5:51 AM

Hi Mallesh,
once you mark the "transfer" check box , service po will capture for that vendor in shipment cost document- service procurement tab.
now save the doc- ship cost doc will be saved.
check the doc flow for ship cost doc-
Flow:
shipment - ended
ship costs - transferred
service acceptance - completed.
service acceptance number(Entry sheet) will be available in shipment cost doc - service procurement tab- under the "purchasing doc" field.
plz check n cofirm

Process Order Costing Report

Dear All,
From Report S_ALR_87013127 i required target/actual comparison report for Multiple Order .
I am going to report home page and enter the multiple order and execute report on the result screen get the order list
and now select all order and go to colorful checker box at header (Report call button) for order target / actual report but system is giving me a error message "Select only one order or order item"
I want to download multiple orders detail list at a time how it is possible from report "S_ALR_87013127" or if any report available in to the system than pls guide me
and if report is not available then any table or structure available in the system from where i fetch data and develop a Z report
Regards,
Murari Shah

hi murari..
You can use AUFK & AUFM to develop a z report for all orders list.
kkumar

Process Order Costing Report Requirement

Dear All,
From Report S_ALR_87013127 i required target/actual comparison report for Multiple Order .
I am going to report home page and enter the multiple order and execute report on the result screen get the order list
and now select all order and go to colorful checker box at header (Report call button) for order target / actual report but system is giving me a error message "Select only one order or order item"
I want to download multiple orders detail list at a time how it is possible from report "S_ALR_87013127" or if any report available in to the system than pls guide me
Regards,
Murari Shah

Hi Murari
This report can take you to each single order at one go...
If you want to download all the Prod orders in excel with detailed itemization (i.e. Each BOM Component, Activity Qty, etc), I doubt any report in SAP would help you.... You can take help of your ABAPer and develop a new report
br, Ajay M

Process of costing

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for