Process order is not there in AFKO or AFPO table.

Hi,
In our production system, process orders are converted through batch job,and the its control recipe is sent to MES using batch job. I find fome process order's data is available in MES system but that order is not there in SAP.
Please let me know your input.
Regards
Syed

Hi,
In your DSO just make sure that request available for reporting symbol is active for all the requests, if it is not for any of the request then select particular request and activate the data.
After that you can load datainto InfoCube and I have checked in my system though we have data available in cube the symbol Data Mart Status is blank.
I don't think there is any relation between this symbol and cube loading.
Regards,
Durgesh.

Similar Messages

Process order should not take part in MRP run

Hello Colleagues
I looking for a way how to exclude not released process orders (we have PP-PI) from MD04 report. Not released process order should not take part in MRP run. I was trying to do it using OPJJ for availability check 02 and checking rule PP but I was not able to get result. Could you please help, probably there are other settings?
Best Regards
Eduard

Hi,
Settings in OPJJ will take effect only when you create or release process orders.
As a work around you can try to exclude process order is
1. Create a Storage location and make it not relevant for MRP-OMIR
2. In Material master for the material in MRP assign storage location MRP as 1 (exclude storage location stock)
3. Create the process order, in the GR tab enter the storage location (not MRP relevant)
In the MRP run it will not take the process order into account.
After releasing change the storage location to the normal sotrage location.
In this process flow, the control is with the storage location.
Check it in your sandbox.
Thanks,
JK

Phases/operation in process order does not exist

phases/operation in process order does not exist this error coming when cor6n is using.why?

HI
After creating Master recipe in C201, under the operations tab you need to define the operations involved in recipe . along with the operation column there is phase indicator column is there which is to be selected whether this operation is phase or not...
Check and revert
Regards
Anupam Sharma

Set Deletion Flag for Process Order is not possible due to status ORRQ

Hi Guys,
I need to mark some process orders for deletion, but the status ORRQ (order record required) is blocking me. I've read some SAP Documentations and SAP Notes and it's recommending run tcode COPA to store the order records. A
Although the Process Order is appearing there to be stored, we I execute store process it gives me a message that "Zero Orders were stored".
So, can you help me on this?
Thanks.
Pérsio Kojima

Hi Pérsio,
Check In Customizing whether the order type has been set up for storing in T code COR4 (order type-dependent parameters, Master data tab page, Order record required indicator).
IF the option is selected, the system will not delete the record directly. The order record must be archieved and then deleted.
based on this either you can de activate the option or archive before deletion.
Hope this answers your question.
regards,
Pradeep.

Text in PI Sheet and Process Order did not match

Dear Sir,
We are going to upgrade to our system from 4.7 to ECC6.
We have a problem with PI Sheets with the Long text. The text instruction shown in the PI sheet is not matching with the long text put in the Process Order and Master Receipe.
We are using the Process Instruction Category "INST" and we are puting long text for instruction for this in the Master Receipe. At the time for creation of Process Order this Process instruction Category fatch correct value of long text from the Master Receipe after released the Process Order, Control Recipe generated for the same Process Order. But when we are going to process these Control Receipe from the T-Code CO60, We find the some different text for the "INST".
This problem is not for one Material and Plant Specific.
Thanks and Regards,
Gaurav Kumar
Application Consultant SAP PP
Mobile +91 9971003631

Hello Gaurav,
There might be another possibility, make sure if you make any changes in the Control Recipe Destination program or user exit to populate the long text while sending the CR to the destination to reflect with the PO/Master Recipe.
with best regards
K. Mohan Reddy

Process order settlements not flowing into BI for Inventory

Hi,
I built a cube for inventory based on the standard extractors to generate MAC values. I have three MAC reports, each for daily, weekly and monthly. The reports give the right values at the at the month level , but whenever there is a settlement for process order done, BI does not pick the settlement value and this makes the MAC value shoot up at the daily and weekly level. I tried to a find an extractor for this settlement and could not find any. Can someone please help me with this ? Is there any datasource for settlement of process order?
Thanks

Hi,
Both Tomas and Debraj have provided good tips. Let me elaborate on this.
From SWU3, access Maintain Runtime Environment -> Schedule Background Job for Missed Deadlines by double clicking on it and execute it. You could maintain the interval until next deadline check. You could keep the number low.
Also, if you have the event queue turned on, some times the work items will stuck in the queues and took a long time for them to be available.
Best Regards,
Jennifer Cha
GRC RIG

In process order confirmation screen there should be 2 rows for down time.

hi,
We are using cor6n for process order confirmation, where we can put down time with confirmation text at once,
if there is two different down time, then user has to again run cor6n with 0 yield for put another down time, which gets more time.
for this reason i have customised single screen entry profile by mentioning two down time & confirmation rows in screen.
when i going for confirmation i put two different down time after goods movemnt order get confirmed & settled.
but when i see report in COOISPI there is only one down time against order.
system only considers last down time.
hows the system consider down time?
thanks in advance.
regards
sanjay.

Hi,
The report COOISPI considers only one line of the down time, it is not considering the 2nd row of the down time. You need to change the COOISPI program to read the 2 lines of the down time. You need to change the standard program to read the 2 down time lines.
Thanks & Regards,
V. Suresh

Process order deletion not possible through PRARCHP1but can do in COR2

Hi Guru's,
I want to set Process order status to DLFL through program PRARCHP1 but getting message as "there are no Log messages" however I am able to set deletion flag through COR2. It appears strange to me. I am try to set to DLFL status for TECO orders. Could you please suggest How can I set DLFL to eligible process orders? (Pls find attached selection screen details)
Regards,
Uday

Hello
Check the following information from question 10 of FAQ note 540834:
Question:
              During the initial archiving run (when you set the deletion flag and/or the deletion indicator) or during archiving, the system does not process all of the orders that correspond to the selection criteria. Why?
Answer:
              Note that, in addition to the selection criteria, the residence times from Customizing of the order types (transaction OPJH for production orders and transaction CORN for process orders) is evaluated. In this case, the residence times have the following impact:
Residence time 1:
The time interval (in calendar months) that must elapse between setting the deletion flag and setting the deletion indicator.
Residence time 2:
The time interval (in calendar months) that must elapse between setting the deletion indicator and archiving (writing to the archive and deleting).
              In addition, note that orders without delivery dates are not processed if a delivery date overrun or an interval for the actual delivery date is specified.
BR
Caetano

Automatic Process order type not picking in CR01

Hi friedns,
i have created new Production scheduler-030 for plant - 0101 through - CORU and CORY t.codes and we are not assigning the
Prod. sched. profile in Materail master.
Now while creating the new process order through CR01,system is not picking automatically process order type for new production scheduler -030 and new prodction schedulre already assign in material master .
For old Production scheduler-010 process order type is picking automatically for same plant.
Are there any user exit need to update.
Please advise.
Thank you.
Regards.
asuvamsi

Thanks for you reply!!
PLease find the scrren shots.
MM02 screen.
COR1:
Thank you.
Regards
Vamsi

Sale order bom can be used in to process order or not

To change the BOM for particular order items the sale order BOM can be created , to copy the sale order BOM into production order CO08 can be used , whether the process order can be created with ref to sale order any option is available is SAP

Hi,
There is no such transaction for process order with respect to Sale order.If planned order is created with respect to sale order after MRP,that can be converted to process order thorugh COR8 transaction.
try to explore COR8 transaction

Process Order is not picking the follow-up material

Hi Gurus,
We have changed a BOM by discontinuing a component and giving a follow-up material with the valid from dates as 18/5/09. and then MRP is run on that nignt ( mrp job set to run daily in the back ground). and on 19/05/09 a Process Order is created from the planned orders genereated by the MRP run.
now, we found that the new componenet (follow-up) is not copied into the process order, but the old compomemt (discontinued) is removed.
MRP parameters are correctly defined (Planning mode is set to 2) . Please let me know if we are missing anything.
Thanks,
N

Hi
Pl ensure that the Following requirements have been met before you can use the discontinuation functionality:
1) Both materials must be planned using MRP.
2) The base unit of measure of the follow-up material must be the same as the base unit of measure of the discontinued material.
3) You must enter discontinuation data for the discontinued item and follow-up data for the follow-up item.
and Also refer the SAP link for Complete Details
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_45b/helpdata/en/b1/c044d1439a11d189410000e829fbbd/content.htm
Regards
Brahmaji

Process Orders are not getting closed-- Unsettled Variances; Balances exist

Hello Gurus,
We have a problem when we are trying to close process orders in Release 4.6C; We are unable to close those orders and the error messages would be variances are not settled and balances still exist.
When we try to modify the periodic settlement in process order settlement rule it gets grayed out and wont let us do any modifications. Some body suggested that we have to make the settlement rule to FUL and then try to close but it never works. It's a problem for quite sometime, any help would be worth more than an appreciation.
Thanks,
Ramana

Hi Ramana
You need to more specific on the errors and the description of the process where you are finding the problem
Eloborate your problem like what is the settlement type now, whether you have done the variance calculation, what is the status of the order now (TECO, DLV etc.,)
Make the process order in TECO or DLV, calculate the variance calculation and settle the order.
Regards,
Suraj

Process Order API not initiating PO Acknowledgment Transaction.

I have set up a Customer as trading partner in XML Gateway, taking care that the primary Sold To site is used for set up in XML Gateway. When i am creating orders using API, it is not triggering the Purchase Order Acknowledgment transaction.
Does API support calling POA transaction ?

All of order processing in order management is done using a private version of the process order API. (i.e the OE_PROCESS_ORDER_PVT package.) Hence, it will not matter to the PO acknowledgment transaction, how you create the order. The acknowledgment should get created. POAO is the transaction for the EDI acknowledgment (US: EDI 855 document)
Do you see the "_ACK" tables getting populated with acknowledgment data? If yes, you will need to investigate the extraction program for POAO. If not, you will need to investigate in OM.
Hope this helps.
Thanks.
Kannan

Financial extension sets and flb1 post processing items are not there

"Forum moderators, if you reject this post please tell me exactly what is incorrect about it in your rejection message".
Hello experts,
We are currently in 4.7 and have activated financial extension set EA-FIN. I tested electronic lockbox programs but when I try to find the unprocessed items they are not in FLB1 or FEBA. I have searched forums but have not been able to identify the problem. I have also research to see if additional config is needed with the activation of the extension sets but have been unsuccessful there also. Electronic lockbox posting and the ability to apply unprocessed payments in FLB1 was working correctly before the activation.
Your help is greatly appreciated.
Carrol

I was able to deactive the NEW_FEBA using trans SM31 table V_T100C using message 002 transaction FEBAN not required. FLB1 started.
This solved my problem
Carrol

Fiancial extension sets and flb1 post processing items are not there

Hello experts,
We are currently in 4.7 and have activated financial extension set EA-FIN. I tested electronic lockbox programs but when I try to find the unprocessed items they are not in FLB1 or FEBA. I have searched forums but have not been able to identify the problem. I have also research to see if additional config is needed with the activation of the extension sets but have been unsuccessful there also. Electronic lockbox posting and the ability to apply unprocessed payments in FLB1 was working correctly before the activation.
Your help is greatly appreciated.
Carrol

I was able to deactive the NEW_FEBA using trans SM31 table V_T100C using message 002 transaction FEBAN not required. FLB1 started.
This solved my problem
Carrol

Process order is not there in AFKO or AFPO table.

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for