Process order settlement Ko88 not working.

Hello Sapients,
i am getting a message:"There are no accrued amounts; settlement is not possible."
Following are the steps i cariried.
1.) created a Process order CR01
2.) did goods issue to the process order using MIGO_GI
3.) when i run KKAX I am able to the costs in WIP.
4.) but when i execute the ko88 for the particular process order systme is not settling any but instead giving me a message: "There are no accrued amounts; settlement is not possible."
5.) Could you please advise if I am missing any thing.
Thanks and Regards
Ravi

Hi Ravi,
Please, check if you have run the settlement already for period that you wants to do the settle by path  KO88 -> goto -> previous settlement or by  extras -> activate flow trace at Ko88 to analysis the problem.
Please, also verify the SAP note 179533. This note has some informations regarding the problem.
Regards,
Paulo

Similar Messages

  • PROCESS ORDER SETTLEMENT - KO88

    Hi!
    As per my knowledge KO88 will be done for OHDS and for Material.  OHDS settlement will be done in month ending which results the difference between KSII and KP26.
    Can anybody explain how the accounting entry will be generated at the time of Process order settlement of material i.e. KO88. 
    Sreenivas

    Hi
    Settlement entries are same as in production order.  No diff
    However, u must be aware settlement entries are dependent on status of process order.  If status is DLV or TECO wip is calcelled and variances are calculated.  If status if PREL or REL or PDLV wip entries are posted. 
    Hope you have made settings in WIP for offsetting entries
    Pls assign points if this clarifies else send query with more explanation

  • Process order settlement error

    Hi all
            while doing settlement of process order in KO88, system throwing the follwing error.
                     '' valuation data for the material is being locked by the user xxxxxx'' .     If we check in transaction: SM12 , here system showing MARA, MARC tables being locked.
            Some background jobs also running which include MARA,MARC tables.   so please suggest me the best way to do settlement of process orders.  The background jobs should not stop.
    thanks
    sapproduction

    HI
    At the  same time one masters like material WC or PV cannot be processed the database tables used are locked while processing the same to get resolve this  check the time  of scheduled jobs which uses tables like MARA MARC after the finish of these jobs you can process the settlement if you get unlock the data from T code SM12 there is possibility of getting data lost. so
    you can define your settlement process and schedule it just after the completion of those previous Jobs.
    Check and revert
    Regards
    Anupam Sharma

  • Order settlement KO88

    Hallo Friend,
    I am going for Order Settlement KO88. getting error massage If any one face this massage than please tell me Solution.
    FI/CO interface: Balance in transaction currency
    Message no. RW022
    Diagnosis
    The balances in transaction currency must be zero for each logical transaction when transferring to the FI/CO interface. A balance of "               39.001,60-" "INR" was determined for the logical transaction "000001".
    System Response
    The FI/CO interface does not process any transactions which have a balance in transaction currency other than zero.
    Procedure
    This is a system error of the calling application.

    Hi, Check below SAP notes regarding this issue:
    1523814 Transaction AIST ends with error RW022
    1514384 Error message RW022
    1444750 Postings without transaction currency

  • Error during Process order settlement

    Hi Gurus,
    i am facing problem during the process order settlement. an error is occured is as follows: Tax code V0 country IN does not exist in procedure ZTAXIN.
    actually this V0 tax code is assing to the ZTAXIN procedure & which is also assign to country. i couldn't get why it ask tax code during the settlement.
    In Process order Itemization i find the 2 GL ( Element) in which there is one consumption GL & second is COFG sold GL. from GL Master i remove both GL Tax category & also remove the click from posting without tax allowed. till i am facing this problem?
    Please help me to overcome this issue.
    Point will be rewarded if question solved.
    Than'x
    Dhananjay R

    hi gopan,
    Than'x for attention on my question. till my problem is not solved. during the process order why it hit the tax code? would u please guide me how to find the tax code assignment which hit during the process order settlement?
    i have check all the Tax related setting till this issue not solved. ( Check calculation procedure (OBYG), Tax code assignment (FTXP), also check the Tax Account Integration (OB40).
    also i remove tax related assignment from the GL master related to specific gl which are display in component structure.
    pls help me to solve this issue..
    Than'x
    Dhananjay

  • Process Order Settlement Rule by Order Type

    Hi Experts
    Our Client  a requirement to have Process Order Settlement by Order Type please let me know how it can be achieved
    In SAP  a Process Order Variance is settled via the following Combination in OBYC  :-
    1 Chart of Accounts
    2 Transaction PRD
    3 Valuation Modifier
    4 General Modifier
    5 Valuation Class
    6 GL Account
    Can   this account assignment based on the Order Type ?
    Thanks
    Suman

    Dear Suman,
    Normally, Order Types serves a different purpose. We can maintain default settlement rule, Costing Variants, Settlement Profiles, Number ranges etc at Order Type Level.
    It is not possible to directly manage the Order Types in the Account Assignment in OBYC.
    Thanks & Kind Regards
    Umapathi G

  • Process order settlement

    Hi,
    when i do process order settlement , system gives error message that "maintain the settlement rule of the sender".
    Process order contains two co-product and i have given details in "joint production" in MRP II tab.
    When i checked order settlement rule in COR2 i couldn't find anything and when i try to insert new settlement rule system gives error message .
    Sunoj

    error message when executing KKS2
    KV     206     1     OIT 20000095/1     No suitable settlement rule found for object OP0000200000950001          Checking and processing orders

  • Process order settlement to cost center

    Hi,
    We have a requirement to settle only the quantity to material and the costs to
    cost center from the process orders. This is to ensure the materials are
    handled as non-valuated and the COGM is computed from the goods consumption
    postings.
    The process orders will have both co products and by products as well.
    There is also one more requirement to allow Purchase orders against the non-
    valuated materials.
    I am planning to propose the following :-
    1) To make the materials valuated but set the standard price to zero to give
    the effect of non-valuated materials and at the same time can also raise
    purchase orders because otherwise non-valuated materials cannot be used to
    raise Purchase orders.
    2) When goods receipt happens from the process order the actual costs of the
    process order will remain as it is in the process order since the standard
    price of the FG is zero and only the quantity will be received into inventory.
    3) When process order settlement happens the full actual costs will be settled
    to a price difference account and cost center tied to the price difference
    account.
    Do you guys see any flaws in the above design?
    Edited by: FICO Consultant on Feb 21, 2012 4:28 AM

    Answered

  • Confirmation process in SRM does not work whenever there is a discrepancy

    Hello,
    we are on SRM 5.0 version with classic scenario(follow on documents in backed system - ECC 5.0). to procure maintainence service user cretes a shopping cart by selecting describe requirements method and UOM at times in incorrectly asssigned as EA so upon shopping cart approval a follow on ducument (purchase requistion) is created in ECC  as per config set up(in SRM). Buyer while coverting this purchase requisition to PO rectifies this erroe and chages the UOM of meausre to Hr and send a PO to vendor.
    we are not bale to use confirmation feature in SRM to perform receipt of this service. is this how system works? any configration or a BADI needs to be usd to allow to perform confirmation in SRM even tough there is discrepancy in shopping cart UOM and Purcahse requsition UOM.
    when thre is change in UOM in ECC that Purchase
    *Confirmation process in SRM does not work whenever there is a discrepancy (i.e. different UM )between Shoping cart and Purchase Requisition related to that Shoping cart.*
    we donot use serive option in SRM and donnot MM service module in ECC.
    any help on this will be much appreciated.
    Thanks,
    sairam

    The Reset Firefox feature can fix many issues by restoring Firefox to its factory default state while saving your essential information.
    Note: ''This will cause you to lose any Extensions, Open websites, and some Preferences.''
    To Reset Firefox do the following:
    #Go to Firefox > Help > Troubleshooting Information.
    #Click the "Reset Firefox" button.
    #Firefox will close and reset. After Firefox is done, it will show a window with the information that is imported. Click Finish.
    #Firefox will open with all factory defaults applied.
    Further information can be found in the [[Reset Firefox – easily fix most problems]] article.
    Did this fix your problems? Please report back to us!

  • GR of Process order - Document does not contain selectable items

    Hi Guru's,
       While doing GR for process order, user is not able to do the GR because of the below message:
    Document XXXXXX does not contain selectable items
    The other user is able to do the GR. The status of process order is
    REL PCNF PRC EXPL EXTS GMPS MANC PDLV. There is overdelivery tolerance so, the delivered quantity is more than ordered qty.
    There is no auto GR setting, no COGI errors, no final delivery indicator, no authorisation issue.
    What could be the reason for this ?
    Thanks in advance.
    Regards
    Kalyan

    Hi Dee Joy,
      I am using MIGO for posting the GR. So, kinldy let me know what setting in MIGO needs to be done.
    Regards
    Kalyan

  • My order number does not work.  when i sign in it says no orders.  who do i speak to regarding this?

    My order number does not work.  When i sign in it just says no orders.  How do i reach anyone to actually ask what is going on.

    contact adobe support by clicking here and, when available, click 'still need help', https://helpx.adobe.com/contact.html

  • Process order settlements not flowing into BI for Inventory

    Hi,
    I built a cube for inventory based on the standard extractors to generate MAC values. I have three MAC reports, each for daily, weekly and monthly. The reports give the right values at the at the month level , but  whenever there is a settlement for process order done, BI does not pick the settlement value and this makes the MAC value shoot up at the daily and weekly level. I tried to a find an extractor for this settlement and could not find any. Can someone please help me with this ? Is there any datasource for settlement of process order?
    Thanks

    Hi,
    Both Tomas and Debraj have provided good tips.  Let me elaborate on this. 
    From SWU3, access Maintain Runtime Environment -> Schedule Background Job for Missed Deadlines by double clicking on it and execute it. You could maintain the interval until next deadline check.  You could keep the number low.
    Also, if you have the event queue turned on, some times the work items will stuck in the queues and took a long time for them to be available.
    Best Regards,
    Jennifer Cha
    GRC RIG

  • Stop Process order settlement (CO88/KO88) for DLV status orders

    Hello gurus,
    My business requirement is to prevent process orders with status DLV (Delivery completed). In standard SAP orders with DLV/TECO are being settled to settlement receiver. ANy help would be richly rewarded.
    Thanks
    RG

    Dear Ajay,
    Thanks.
    I am able to change the profile. But after that when I try to exit from the screen system throws the following error/message :
    1  Receiver categ. MAT is not allowed by settlement prof. 000090 for this sender
    2. Maximum number of 0 rules reached
    3. Rules exist, but set. prof. 000090 states no settmt of act.costs/cost of sales
    First two are Errors and last one is message with yellow mark.
    Thanks and Regards,
    Nirav

  • Problem with process order settlement

    Hi,
    I'm having a problem while doing settlment for process orders. I have two types of process orders AJWV and AJW0; AJWV works for center 2000 and AJW0 works for center 1000. When I calculate variances both work good. The problem comes when I try to settle them. For AJWV orders there are three finance documents generated, FI document, Controlling document and Profit Center document. But for AJW0 it's just generated Controlling document and Profit Center document.
    Both order types have the same settlement profile assinged
    The settlement rule for both orders is to Cost Center, full settlement 100%
    Both orders are produced for Sales order with valuated stock
    I already checked the account assigment for the materials corresponding to each order, and both account determination are ok.
    What can be the problem so the AJW0 is not posting to FI variances?
    Thanks

    Hi,
    Yes for AJWV the FI entry was generated.

  • Incomplete Process order settlement at Month end.

    We have issue with order settlement during the month end. We have process orders that run over the week (thus will run over the month-end), with REL, PCNF, and PDLV status at the month end. Production does not want to close/ TECO those orders, as we are not yet done. But FI wants to settle them for the month end.
    1) Can FI settle those REL work orders, as mentioned before?
    This is what I found:
    2) The standard practice is TECO, is to set before closing the order.
    3) You can only perform (business) closing for a process order if (CLSD):
    The order has status Released (REL), Control recipe created (CRCR) or Control recipe discarded (CRAB), or Technically completed (TECO). To have status Technically completed, the order must have already reached status Released.
    The order balance is 0.
    There are no more open purchase requisitions, orders, or commitments for it.
    All data related to the process order is available and correct (For example, the inspection lots for the order must be completed).
    There are no future change records from the confirmation processes
    2) So, if statement 1) is correct, is this correct lifeycle:
    A.     Settlement at month end for all orders with REL status.
    B.      TECO after settlement, and also after DLV and CNF status.
    C.      Close after TECO.
    Upload in your comments, if there is any link.
    Thanks, points will be rewarded.

    Hi Abi,
    Since the Process order is in uncompleted stage and partially delivered to stock, still it has WIP to be delivered to stock.
    Calculate the WIP value & settle the order in Month end.
    Prerequisite for WIP calculation is order should has REL status.
    In month end for Uncompleted order , calculate WIP value & settle the Order.
    General steps for month end practice:
    Over head calculation
    WIP calculation
    Variance calculation -  Once the Order receives  -  DLV /TECO  status.
    Order settlement.
    Order closing
    Regards
    Pradeep

Maybe you are looking for