Process order settlements not flowing into BI for Inventory

Hi,
I built a cube for inventory based on the standard extractors to generate MAC values. I have three MAC reports, each for daily, weekly and monthly. The reports give the right values at the at the month level , but whenever there is a settlement for process order done, BI does not pick the settlement value and this makes the MAC value shoot up at the daily and weekly level. I tried to a find an extractor for this settlement and could not find any. Can someone please help me with this ? Is there any datasource for settlement of process order?
Thanks

Hi,
Both Tomas and Debraj have provided good tips. Let me elaborate on this.
From SWU3, access Maintain Runtime Environment -> Schedule Background Job for Missed Deadlines by double clicking on it and execute it. You could maintain the interval until next deadline check. You could keep the number low.
Also, if you have the event queue turned on, some times the work items will stuck in the queues and took a long time for them to be available.
Best Regards,
Jennifer Cha
GRC RIG

Similar Messages

Planned orders are not taking into account the processing time

Hi,
Could you please tell me why planned orders quantities are not based on processing time from the material master.
Materials was set before with 1 day in house production , no matter of lot size.
Based on routings I updated material master with processing time depending on lot size.
What is bottering me now is that planned orders are not taking into account processing time. (e.g. based on my processing time 1000 pce are produced in 3 days, but planned orders show me that 1000 pce are still need in 1 day , but it can not be produced in 1 day ).
what did I miss?
Thanks a lot for any information!

Hello Simona
The in house production time from tab MRP 2 is lot size independent.
However, on tab work scheduling you can define a lot size dependent times.
Please observe that, if you have entered an in house production time, the processing time will not be considered. The F1 help of the field provides the following explanation:
You can define work scheduling times in the material master record in one of two ways:
Either you enter the in-house production time. If required, you can get the system to update this value from the routing.
Or you enter the setup, teardown, processing, and interoperation times. If you maintain these values, the system determines the in-house production time on the basis of lot size.
Therefore, if you want to consider the processing time, you should remove the in house processing time.
BR
Caetano

Gross & Net Weight not flowing into sales order

Hi all,
When i am creating a sales order the Gross weight and Net weight is not flowing into the sales document. i have checked the material master it was maintained properly and item category also it is checked.
if you have any solution please post.
thanks in advance
Sri

Hi,
The unit you're using into sales order is the same of material master?
If not, the unit conversion is mantained in material master?
What kind of material type r you using?
There are "order quantity"? (sorry for that silly question...)
I think when double checking those itens probably you will find the solution.
Regards,
deme

Process order should not take part in MRP run

Hello Colleagues
I looking for a way how to exclude not released process orders (we have PP-PI) from MD04 report. Not released process order should not take part in MRP run. I was trying to do it using OPJJ for availability check 02 and checking rule PP but I was not able to get result. Could you please help, probably there are other settings?
Best Regards
Eduard

Hi,
Settings in OPJJ will take effect only when you create or release process orders.
As a work around you can try to exclude process order is
1. Create a Storage location and make it not relevant for MRP-OMIR
2. In Material master for the material in MRP assign storage location MRP as 1 (exclude storage location stock)
3. Create the process order, in the GR tab enter the storage location (not MRP relevant)
In the MRP run it will not take the process order into account.
After releasing change the storage location to the normal sotrage location.
In this process flow, the control is with the storage location.
Check it in your sandbox.
Thanks,
JK

Revenue values are not flowing into COPA

Dear Experts,
We are processing the MTS normal scenario. Here the revenue values are not flowing into COPA when FG sale. But when we process the Raw material Sale values are flowing to COPA smoothly. Here the SD condition Type, Revenue Account and COPA value Field same for RM and FG.
May I know the exact reasonu2026.
Please suggest me in right wayu2026.
Regards,
Balaji Bhonsle.

Hi Balaji bhau
I guess the issue might be with your Item Category in SD.. Is it set relevant for billing??
See if the Billing Type has been entered in KE4W and the VF reset for it
Check in VFX3 if the invoice is lying there for any error.... Try to release the Billing to accounting and you may get the error message
br, Ajay M

Problem with process order settlement

Hi,
I'm having a problem while doing settlment for process orders. I have two types of process orders AJWV and AJW0; AJWV works for center 2000 and AJW0 works for center 1000. When I calculate variances both work good. The problem comes when I try to settle them. For AJWV orders there are three finance documents generated, FI document, Controlling document and Profit Center document. But for AJW0 it's just generated Controlling document and Profit Center document.
Both order types have the same settlement profile assinged
The settlement rule for both orders is to Cost Center, full settlement 100%
Both orders are produced for Sales order with valuated stock
I already checked the account assigment for the materials corresponding to each order, and both account determination are ok.
What can be the problem so the AJW0 is not posting to FI variances?
Thanks

Hi,
Yes for AJWV the FI entry was generated.

Error during Process order settlement

Hi Gurus,
i am facing problem during the process order settlement. an error is occured is as follows: Tax code V0 country IN does not exist in procedure ZTAXIN.
actually this V0 tax code is assing to the ZTAXIN procedure & which is also assign to country. i couldn't get why it ask tax code during the settlement.
In Process order Itemization i find the 2 GL ( Element) in which there is one consumption GL & second is COFG sold GL. from GL Master i remove both GL Tax category & also remove the click from posting without tax allowed. till i am facing this problem?
Please help me to overcome this issue.
Point will be rewarded if question solved.
Than'x
Dhananjay R

hi gopan,
Than'x for attention on my question. till my problem is not solved. during the process order why it hit the tax code? would u please guide me how to find the tax code assignment which hit during the process order settlement?
i have check all the Tax related setting till this issue not solved. ( Check calculation procedure (OBYG), Tax code assignment (FTXP), also check the Tax Account Integration (OB40).
also i remove tax related assignment from the GL master related to specific gl which are display in component structure.
pls help me to solve this issue..
Than'x
Dhananjay

Group Memberships not Flowing into Metaverse

Hello,
I'm trying to figure out why the group member attributes in the CS are not flowing into the MV. Here's what I have:
An HR system running on SQL Server
A staging database that extract data from the HR system
The staging database has a table representing person object
The stating database has a table representing person multi-valued attributes (i.e location, job code, etc)
The staging database has a table representing group objects
The staging database has a table representing group memberships (mult-valued)
A SQLMA connected to the person and person multi tables
A SQLMA connected to the group and group membership tables
All group memberships are based on job codes and locations. There are no approval process in place. If they have this job code, they get certain groups. That's all calculated in the staging database and the memberships are in the group membership
table
This system does connect to AD (and a few other things), but I'm not concerned with that, right now.
I've read 100 articles on this, most of them over 5 years old, and tried the ones that made sense. The flow from the database into the CS works well. No issues there.
But, a search of the metaverse for the group shows an empty member attribute. The sync process is not throwing any errors. At least they're not showing up in the sync service app or the event logs.
Where allowed, I'm using rules extensions for everything. I can't use a rules extension to set the member attribute because it's an rdn.
I'm going to move forward with this by extending the metaverse schema and adding a multi-valued string attribute named "memberOf" to the person object. Then, I'll modify my existing MA to use that attribute instead of the member attribute.
I'm not sure what kind of issues I'm going to run into when exporting that to AD. I'll cross that bridge when I come to it. I don't anticipate that being an issue as the dns for all these objects will be calculated by the ADMA based on locations,
group functions and person types (bascially, I don't care about the MV rdn).
Anyway, I'm looking for some real world insight on this. This whole effort is to migrate off an existing IDM system that works very, very well but quite expensive to license.
Thanks,
Greg Wilkerson

Hey Cameron,
I have total control of all the DB tables FIM is accessing. I build them up as part of IDM process.
I've read this article, along the many others that address the "manager" scenario. This really doesn't apply in this case as the user and group objects are loaded in separate MAs. Getting reference values to flow with both object live in the
same CS shouldn't be an issue.
I also saw a solution where the group and user objects were in the same table and differentiated by the "object_type" value (user, group). That solution solved the issue of the groups and user being in the same CS. As I grow tired of my daily
FIM beatdown, that solution is growing more attractive. That's a major DB redesign, and seems quite inefficient.
The multi-value table for group memberships already exists in the DB. For FIM purposes, I transferred that data into the user object multi-value table. See screen shot. I can certainly configure the group MA to access that multi-value table
and load the group members as references. But, because the group MA CS will not contain the user objects, I don't see how the references will be set. If the reference value isn't set in the CS, it's not going to flow into the MV (at least I haven't
figured out a way to set the an reference value for an object in the MV - my problem all along.
This whole "setting a reference value" encompasses much more than just group memberships in my implementation. Telephone resources and physical access (key cards, etc) are provisioned through the existing eDirectory system. These objects exist
in our current IDM system and are associated with users based on rules. So, the reference value process is something I need to figure out, if I'm going to use this product.
Maybe I could use a stripped down ECMA2 as a "staging" CS, export the users and groups into this CS and assign the reference values, then import the groups back into the MV, memberships intact. I'm not sure that would get me where I want to go, and
it seems like a lot of extra "stuff" to solve what should be a simple problem. Hmmmmmm. Or, connect the ECMA2 directly to my group membership multi-value table in the DB. Hmmmmmm. I'd still have to export the groups and users into that
CS, but the import might be much more straight forward. Hmmmmmm.
The structure of my GroupMembership table (both columns are anchors or directly translatable to anchors):
EmployeeGroups
   GroupName varchar(50) not null,
   EmployeeID nvarchar(50) not null,
   ID int identity(1,1) not null

Process Orders are not getting closed-- Unsettled Variances; Balances exist

Hello Gurus,
We have a problem when we are trying to close process orders in Release 4.6C; We are unable to close those orders and the error messages would be variances are not settled and balances still exist.
When we try to modify the periodic settlement in process order settlement rule it gets grayed out and wont let us do any modifications. Some body suggested that we have to make the settlement rule to FUL and then try to close but it never works. It's a problem for quite sometime, any help would be worth more than an appreciation.
Thanks,
Ramana

Hi Ramana
You need to more specific on the errors and the description of the process where you are finding the problem
Eloborate your problem like what is the settlement type now, whether you have done the variance calculation, what is the status of the order now (TECO, DLV etc.,)
Make the process order in TECO or DLV, calculate the variance calculation and settle the order.
Regards,
Suraj

Some Sales Orders are not replicating into CRM

Hi guys,
when I check SMQ2 in CRM, I find that some sales orders are not replicating into CRM, then check the error, its says check SMW01..
when I check the SMW01 it says validation error and BDOC status is F05 (information no processing). I tried to search the sales order in CRMD_Order transaction could not find the sales order...
*Error in SMW01*
Processing of document with Guid E01D11C71856C4F1AEBF0024E84DD0CE is canceled CRM_ORDER
Validation error occurred: Module CRM_DOWNLOAD_BTMBDOC_VAL, BDoc type BUS_TRANS_MSG. SMW3
It's not giving much clue what's the error is...
I tried to setup a request to replicate those sales orders.. those request also end up in the same error...
any help on this?
thanks,
Ken

Hello Ken,
When reprocessing a BDoc(via SMW01) you might need to set a flag.
Goto trxn. SMW01. Start the debugger using command '/h' and reprocess the BDoc. After going into the debug mode press SHIFT+F7 and put a breakpoint at 2nd Tab in : class:cl_smw_flow and method 'restart_processing'. Keep debugging(F5 or F6 accordingly) until you find the requisite flag l_retry_allowed and set it as 'X'. This will allow you to reprocess the Bdoc.
Thanks,
Rohit

Excise Duty Base Amount not flowing into ARE -1

Dear Friends,
While Iam creating ARE-1 for the Exports Excise Invoice - Excise Duty Base Amount not flowing into ARE1
thanks
Sasi

Dear Lakshmipathi,
Earlier Liable to AT1 is ticked but not Indicator NCCD,I have checked after ticking the NCCD as well....
In my pricing procedure i dont have the NCCD condition .....as its not required.
In classify consditiontypes: I have maintained PR00 condition type as well along with Excise condition types...Do i need to maintain this PR00 anywhere else
or
Is there anything I need to do with the assesable value.......if so how should be the entry like in the pricing procedure?
Can someone please provide me the solution...its very urgent
Thanks
Sasi

Process order settlement

Hi,
when i do process order settlement , system gives error message that "maintain the settlement rule of the sender".
Process order contains two co-product and i have given details in "joint production" in MRP II tab.
When i checked order settlement rule in COR2 i couldn't find anything and when i try to insert new settlement rule system gives error message .
Sunoj

error message when executing KKS2
KV 206 1 OIT 20000095/1 No suitable settlement rule found for object OP0000200000950001 Checking and processing orders

Tax and pricing info are not flowing into Idoc orders02-eledp04 and 05

Hi,
We are carrying out SRM5.5 -SUS and ECC6.0 Integration using PI 7.
We are configuring for the MM-SUS Scenario.
Now,to accomodate the Tax / Pricing we have installed the add on
component LOCINSUS and we are having doubts on how to use it:
1) Tax and pricing information are not flowing into IDOC- orders02
(e1edp04 and e1edp05 segments are not present in the created IDOC). The
condition print indicator in checked on ECC System and we have also
implemented SAP note 995986.
2)In create ASN transaction , we are not able to see the Excise Invoice
Number and Date field in Basic data tab as expected from SAP Library
document although we have installed the Localization Add on component.
Please help us to reso1ve these issues,
Regards,
Mani
099890-22217.

Mani,
Did you resolve this issue, because we are having the same issue in ECC6 with IDoc ORDERS02.
If you did resolve this issue could you please let us know how, much appreciated.
Bill.

Customer receipts and payments are not flowing into PS module

Dear Team,
I am new to the PS module..... Customer receipts and payments are not flowing into PS module. Kindly let me know the missing configuration steps.
Thanks !!!

Sagar Kapadia wrote:
> 1) What is the pre-requisite configuration for activation of Commitments and Project Cash management in the PS system?
> 2) Is there any word of caution which needs to be kept in mind at the time of activation?
> 3) once activated, what will the impact on the data? Are there any chances of data inconsistency?
>
Only one pre-requisite is the creation of FM area.
As I suggested earlier, please read SAP help which will answer all your queries.
Please follow the below path...
SAP Help Portal >>> SAP ERP Central Component >>> Financials >>> Project System >>> Payments >>> Project Cash Management.

Material delta changes are not flowing into CRM

Dear All,
material delta changes are not flowing into CRM, because the product hierarchy on material has been changed to a new product hierarchy. I do not want to download again the object DNL_CUST_PROD1 because it maight cause inconstancies in CRM. (I have already defined some z product hierarchies in CRM)
Do I need to create the new product hierarchy also in CRM manually?
Appreciate any inputs
Raj

Hi Raj,
Use the transacrion R3AR2 to create a z object for DNL_CUST_PROD1 and assign DNL_CUST_PROD1 as the object name
Then in request detail screen for new z object enter the details like table name (T179 in your case) and the name of the product hierarchy that you want to bring in. Save the transaction
Then use the transaction R3AR4 to initiate the download for your new z object as you normally do in R3AS.
Then go to SMW01 and reprosess the struck Bdoc.
Reward points if helps,
Regards,
Paul Kondaveeti

Process order settlements not flowing into BI for Inventory

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for