Processing log not getting updated for send immediatly

Hi,
I have a custom output type and a Custom function module for issueing the output for delivery, my prob is that it processing log is getting updated for the send in batch and other options but it is not getting updated for the SEND IMMEDIATLY, I am using the same FM for the Output issue I am checking if they have selected output type as 4 if yes, I am calling a FM in perform by saying
PERFORM xxxxxxxx ON COMMIT
and in the perform I am calling a FM
CALL FUNCTION xxxxxxxxx in BACKGROUND TASK AS A SEPARATE TASK,
the functioanlity of issueing the output is working but the Processing log is not getting updated.
What might be the problem ? it is getting updated for Send in batch but not for except 4.

I am updating Log using this form
at every step I am collecting the messages and passing them to this form.
FORM update_nast_log USING   p_msgid
                              p_msgnr
                              p_msgty
                              p_msgv1
                              p_msgv2
                              p_msgv3
                              p_msgv4.
* Local data declaration
DATA: lv_msgid LIKE sy-msgid,
        lv_msgnr LIKE sy-msgno,
        lv_msgty LIKE sy-msgty,
        lv_msgv1 LIKE sy-msgv1,
        lv_msgv2 LIKE sy-msgv2,
        lv_msgv3 LIKE sy-msgv3,
        lv_msgv4 LIKE sy-msgv4.
* clear all the local variables
CLEAR:lv_msgid,
        lv_msgnr,
        lv_msgty,
        lv_msgv1,
        lv_msgv2,
        lv_msgv3,
        lv_msgv4.
* move message ID,number,msg type and the messsages
*     to local variables
MOVE: p_msgid TO lv_msgid,
        p_msgnr TO lv_msgnr,
        p_msgty TO lv_msgty,
        p_msgv1 TO lv_msgv1,
        p_msgv2 TO lv_msgv2,
        p_msgv3 TO lv_msgv3,
        p_msgv4 TO lv_msgv4.
* Update nast table using nast protocol update
CALL FUNCTION 'NAST_PROTOCOL_UPDATE'
    EXPORTING
      msg_arbgb = lv_msgid
      msg_nr    = lv_msgnr
      msg_ty    = lv_msgty
      msg_v1    = lv_msgv1
      msg_v2    = lv_msgv2
      msg_v3    = lv_msgv3
      msg_v4    = lv_msgv4.
ENDFORM.                    " UPDATE_NAST_LOG

Similar Messages

Payment Terms not getting updated for local Purch Org Vendor Combination

Hi
I have updated the vendor master with new payment term in EBP. The same got updated for Back End Pucrh Org. But it is not getting updated for local Purch Org. I am using extended classic scenario and have BE and local Purch Org.
I anybody can tell me the solution on how to update payment terms for Vendor with local Purch Org. Thanks
Regards
Vinod Raorane

Hi
Which SRM version are you using ?
<u>How you replicated the Vendor master in EBP ? Which transactions or programs you used ?
Have you used BBPGETVD Transaction or any other program ?
And also checked the log of SLG1 transaction. ?
Can you see the updated details in BBPMAINTINT Transaction for that vendor
Any other logs you noticed in SLG1 or ST22 Transaction ?</u>
Please refer to following links.
<b>http://help.sap.com/saphelp_srm50/helpdata/en/18/db183d30805c59e10000000a114084/frameset.htm
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_srm50/helpdata/en/43/1f8c03b8c606f4e10000000a422035/frameset.htm
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_srm50/helpdata/en/d3/4b9c3b122efc6ee10000000a114084/frameset.htm
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_srm50/helpdata/en/56/54f137a5e6740ae10000009b38f8cf/frameset.htm
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_srm50/helpdata/en/81/e08194b6e4734f8dde536e8b8ac4a0/frameset.htm
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_srm50/helpdata/en/92/fd7d3cb7f58910e10000000a114084/frameset.htm</b>
Hope this will help.
Please reward suitable points, incase it suits your requirements.
Regards
- Atul

Value property not getting updated for edit on firefox

Der Sir/Mam,
I am a selenium tester and my test fails on moxila due to following issue,
Value property not getting updated for edit on firefox thats why failing the script while identifying the object from xPath.
The test case run fine on IE.
I want to identify the object by its xPath saying value = "Some value"
I can not check thousands of object by looking in to its value attribute property.
Thanks in advance,
Rohit

I'm not sure whether we can solve your question here. We are mostly supporting the released version of Firefox (Firefox 20) for regular use rather than old versions in a test harness. You might need to reach out to the [https://groups.google.com/forum/?fromgroups#!forum/selenium-users Selenium Users Group] if you can't replicate the problem in Firefox 20.

Age not getting updated for past months

Hi all,
I have loaded the cube 0PA_C01 for HR data regarding Personal Administration.
Since I have loaded the cube in April,therefore in the cube when I see I get the correct Age of an employee for April.But for March,Feb and Jan I am not getting the Age as it is not getting updated.I checked the update rule 0HR_PA_0 and 0HR_PA_1,according to me it calculates the age based on system date.
The data in my cube looks as below:
AGE             CALMONTH                   HEADCOUNT
                 012006                         2679
                  022006                         2694
                  032006                         2694
15                042006                            1
20                042006                            1
and so on.
Could you please suggest how to get the Age for past months?
Thanks in advance.
Best Regards,
Yogesh

Is the update rule for age,a customized one?
If so it could happen that routine was setup after the data load of March.So April load is correct while the other older loads are not.
Try deleting and reconstructing the data requests of months older than April,in the cube.See if this corrects the age.
Another thing confused me.
AGE CALMONTH HEADCOUNT
012006 2679
022006 2694
032006 2694
15 042006 1
20 042006 1
Does datasource send 1 record for each employee?Looks so as it has employee age(which must be calculated by difference between date of birth and system-date).Then how come each record has HEADCOUNT field?
cheers,
Vishvesh

BDOC status completely processed: data not getting updated

Hi Experts
I'm downloading BP data from R/3 system to CRM system , data is successfully getting into the CRM system when checking the SMW01 it was showing the status fully processed (status green) ,but data is not getting updated in tables.
Please let us know what could be the possible reason
Thanks & regards
Rajasekhar

1) First check the data in the BDOC. Check if the partners are really cmoing.
2) Check if there are any dumps created in ST22. If yes Pls analyze them.
3) Check the flow defintion for bdoc type BUPA_MAIN. You can check this in SMW01. Check if the actual call to upload the data and create BP is done.

Price for I/C (Cost) field in VF03 not getting updated for an Invoice

hi,
the amount field (KBETR) for condition type ZR04 in VR03, for a specific invoice generated, is coming out to be 0.00 USD.
as a result, the condition value is also coming out to be 0.00 and hence, not getting updated.
can anyone help me out with this?

Hi Pratima,
unfortunately i can only write that I am facing the same challenge at the moment. I will update the discussion as soon as I have a solution.
Best regards
Bjoern

Moving Average Price does not get updated for Project Stock

Hello Experts
We have an Engineer-to-Order implementation for our client. Accordingly procurement is done per project. Each Project issues its PRs which are then converted to POs and recieved into Project Stock.
While assigning the material to the Network activity in Project (using material component) the system uses the price found in the material master (MAP or STD) as a planned cost appended to the project.
Problem:
while procuring the material, when we receive it into Project Stock (Mvt 101 Q + ) the Moving Average Price in the material master does not get updated. this way all newly created material master will never have a moving average price, thus whenever we try to assign them to the project we receive an error message (Cost for Material Component ###Mat.Num### cannot be determined.
Question:
How can I get the system to update moving average price (for all types of stock) based on procurement for project stock.???
Your help is kindly appreciated.

I'm sorry for the confusion
Case:
The T-code is CJ20N Project Builder in PS module
we are assigning material components to network activities under a certain WBS element in the project.
there is a function in the Project Builder to calculate the cost of a network. it uses the costing variant assigned to the network which is PS02 (We get the error here)
The costing variant has a valuation variant which lists a series of strategies to get the material price. Planned 1 if not then STD if not then MAP. (you can choose between many options via a drop down menu) you can choose 5 consequent options.
The MAP that the valuation variant is coded to get is the Plant Stock MAP -- Or the Project Stock MAP but only Per WBS element.
The MAP that the Actual postings update is the Project Stock MAP only Per WBS element.
This means that if you use a material component to purchase material 123 Acc.As. Q for WBS X for 10 $ then you try to assign a new material component with the same material 123 to WBS Y, the system will not get a MAP. because it's stored in QBEW per WBS element.
This way the system will never get the MAP right.
However, we don't always use project stock to procure for projects, for some requirements we can assign and use plant stock as well for Projects. that way we need the MAP from plant stock.
In the Valuation Variant you can use a User Exit Strategy. The user exit's name is COPCP005
My Suggestion is:
Use the User Exit COPCP005 to calculate the { Total value / the total quantity (MAP) from QBEW + Total value / total quantity (MAP) from MBEW } / 2
which is the MAP for both plant and project stock together, since that we are going to use both.
Q: Is this correct !?

Time stamp is not getting updated for File Adapter in communication channel

Hi All,
Since yesterday, I am observing that the time stamp of communication channel for File adapter is not gettingupdated some times.
I had to stop and start the communication channel to update the time stamp.Please let me know if anyone has come across such issue or any useful notes on this.I could not find any related notes on Market place.
Regards,
Dinakar

Hi,
This is happening only with one communication channel which is sender in derection.Any reason why it is happening like this?since the restart of the communication channel it is getting update now.I really do not know how to delete/create the communication channels as this was done our PI consultants.Pls guide me.
Regards,
Dinakar

Purchase order history not getting updated for Delivery Costs invoice

Hi
Please let me know the reason why delivery costs invoice entry details are not updated in Purchase order history. As it is observed in another client.
Thanks and advance.
Regards
Mohan

Hi
Following Stpes are executiong...
1. PO
2. MIRO for Custom duties
3. MIGO (PO History getting updated after GR for both delivery costs and GR 101)
Thanks in Advance.
Regards
Mohan

Quantity field not getting update in PCA document for Goods Receipt

We have the Purchase Account activated for our company code.
For movement type 101 (Goods Receipt), I am getting the quantity field updated for GR/IR account and Stock Account (B/S item).
But the quantity field is not getting updated for the "Purchase Account" and the "other offsetting PL A/C).
Please advice whether I am missing something.
Regards
B.Mohanty

Hi Aravind,
Check SAP notes 1063198 and 1117587.
FAGLL03 display quantity which is updated in FAGLFLEXA, BSEG is not
relevant in this case. This is clearly explained in the note 1063198.
The quantity posts through to FI on the 'goods receipt' items, but not on the
'invoice receipt' items.
In the FI normally the Quantity is not a 'real' important field, as it
is more related to the MM area.
But in the old 'Profit Center Accounting' and the old' Special Ledger'
the field has been important.
As the same logic of these areas to 'store' the Quantity is also used
in the NewG/L the field get only filled in the line, where it make
'sense' from our point of view, because only in the 'goods receipt'
lines a 'real' Quantity is posted to the system.
So as before in the PCA and SL, now also in the NewG/L the Quantity is
filled in the correct and important lines and postings.
In the BSEG ('old document segment table') the field is filled 'just'
as it is send to the FI, but this is not completely correct from the
business point of view.
This can also lead to issues with the reporting and summation to this
field. So with creating the new logic in the NewG/L the 'correct'
standard of the 'writing' for the Quantity has also been taken over.
So in the end, the update and display is correct according SAP standard behavior.
Actually,Quantities within G/L are never reliable,
because the purpose of FI is a view on the data according to amount
but not according to quantity.
In the FI normally the Quantity is not a 'real' important field, as it
is more related to the MM area.
I hope I could be of assistance.
Regards,
Fernando

FD33 - Receivable Field in Customer master is not getting updated

FD33 - Receivable Field in Customer master is not getting updated for the FI documents posted in the customer account. I need to know is there any setting either in FI or in SD, which control whether the FI document is relevant to credit check?
In SD, we are having the item category but i am not getting how to control for FI documents? How can i make them credit relevant item. Also for special item, we are controlling the same through Transaction code : OBXY - by special GL indicators but what about the normal/general item?
How can I control the general FI documents having various FI documents type as relevant to credit check?

Apart from the above,please also check the below:
FD33 - Receivable Field in Customer master is not getting updated for the FI documents posted in the customer account. I need to know is there any setting either in FI or in SD, which control whether the FI document is relevant to credit check?
As per me there is no specific control to active the credit active field in FI values unlike for updating the sales values in FD32 we activate credit active for the item cat(VOV7) which will ensure the sales values to update (open order, open delivery and open invoices) in to credit management.
For FI values to update i think this is inbuilt in the program only.( example update group 000012,15,18 etc).
Any way coming into query not updating the receivables, please check the below points once again.
1. Check the whether invoice has accounting document generated or not, make sure that it is generated then only system update the receivables.
2. Even if the above all points are checked including above all posts,then also still the same issue repeating then try to run the program RVKRED77, before this first run RVKRED88 and compare this values with FD32.
thanks,
Srinu.

Excise table J_1IEXCDTL not getting updated with Excise Base value.

Hi All,
The the field EXBAS of table J_1IEXCDTL is not getting updated for ETT (Transaction Type) DLFC.
For other transaction types, the same is getting populated.
Is there a setting for controlling the same?
If yes, can you please guide me.
Best Regards
Debaditya Ghosh

First you should ensure that it is flowing in your billing document. If so, automatically, it will also flow in your excise invoice and the field EXBAS will be updated accordingly.
From your comments, it seems, the amount is not flowing in your billing document and excise invoice. If so, ensure that you have assigned the correct tax code in FV11 for your ED condition type.
thanks
G. Lakshmipathi

Weblogic Access Logs not getting generated / updated only for Admin server

Hi All,
I have a query ,
We recently noticed that the weblogic access logs for our admin server are not getting generated.
However we checked that the access logs are getting generated for the managed servers that we have.
There is not much difference between the logging settings between the admin and the managed servers.
We thought that there might be some problem with the buffering and that the data might not be written to the files immediately.
So after researching we found the parameter "-Dweblogic.logging.bufferSizeKB=0" and added that to the java options however it did not make any difference.
Also we tried modifying the config script as ,
<server>
<web-server>
<web-server-log>
<buffer-size-kb>0</buffer-size-kb>
</web-server-log>
</web-server>
</server>
However no luck .....
We are using weblogic 9.2 MP3 and think there might be some bug with this version , however its hard to believe that the logs are generated and updated for managed servers and not for the admin servers.
The only thing we notice in the access logs of the admin server is 404 errors.
Any suggestions ?
Regards,
Stacey.

This has come up recently here:
access log not writing to disk in a timely fashion
I didn't find that buffer-size-kb capability in the docs in 9.2. I recommend checking with support.

GLPCA table not getting updated correctly for VBUND

Hi All,
I have come across one issue that the value of trading partner field (VBUND) in table GLPCA are not getting updated correctly for document type KP.
In vendor master this field has different value versus it is showing in GLPCA-VBUND.
Does any one knows about ?
Thanks for your help on it.
Regards,
Manoj

Hi Sridhar,
Thanks for your response on it.
This note is not applicable for our system as we are working on 4.0B with support pack 52.
Also we are getting this worng update of this field (GLPCA-VBUND) while doing MR11 creating document with doc. type KP. This value is not picking from vendor master (LAF1-VBUND) and randamly picking any value. Not sure from where ?
Please advise your thought.
Thanks,
Manoj

Data is not getting updated in table using RFC

Hi Experts,
In my scenario, I am calling one RFC using RFC receiver channel. After running scenario, channel is showing status that RFC executed successfully. But when I am checking tables in R/3 system, data is not getting updated.
Moreover , when we tried to execute the RFC manually in R/3 system, that time data uploaded into table successfully.
Could anybody tell me what would the reason that data not uploading into table when we send it through XI.
Regards,
Sari

HI Sari,
as you have scenario with RFC receiver.. and as you mentioned that it not updating tables when run through PI but when you execute RFC manually tables got updates.. then following are the options you can check..
-- if you check RFC communication channel and if everything ok on then.. this means that your RFC is getting triggered successfully..but as you said tables are not updated.. for this you can go to SXMB_MONI and check the log take payload after mapping.. and compare it with the input when you try to execute it manually.. I think the input when you try manually and input to RFC when you try through PI is different and that is causing the Problem.. you will be able to see the difference in input then check.. I think the problem is data and not RFC communication channel..so by using this you will come to know difference
-- else if possible configure your ID in PI in RFC Receiver and then check and put breakpoint on ABAP side.. so that when PI will hit RFC you will get it in debug mode and able to see what is going wrong..
Thanks,
Bhupesh

Processing log not getting updated for send immediatly

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for