Processor requirements FMLE h.264

Hi guys. I have just bought in some equipment to make a TV-stream. I have succsessfully built everthing and made a stream. Now it seems like the processor have problems encoding it. I use theese settings in flash media live encoder:
Video:
Device: DeckLink Video Capture
Format: H.264
Frame Rate: 60 fps
Input Size: 1280x720
Bit rate: 800kbps with size: 502x282
Audio:
Device: DeckLink Video Capture
Format: AAC
Channels: Stereo
Sample rate: 44100
Bit rate: 96
Streamsize: 896 kbps.
And now my processor is under 100% load and seems to have problems to encode the video. Im using HDMI as input with 1080p
Hardware used to encode:
DESCRIPCIÓN
Motherboard
ASUS P5G41T-M LE: (LGA775) 2DDR3,
Processor
Intel Dual Core E6700 2x3,20 GHz 775/1066
RAM
Modulo DDR3 2Gb 1333Mhz HyperX KHX1333C9D3B1/
Hard Drive
Disco Duro Samsung 500Gb 3.5" sATA2 7200r
Is this due to a bad processor or is there anything i can do to make the stream stable and better quality?
I want to have the stream output in 800x"something" with the same setting.
This is kind of urgent and i would realy appreciate it if someone could be to any help!

I have given up on Premier for now as it relates to fv4
editing.
1. You have to encode using the ACC or AAC (whatever it is
called) plugin. MP3 is not an option. If you use MP3 Premier can't
use the file.
2. I am not doing anything fancy with my files so Premier is
just overkill.
I found that once you flatten the f4v xilisoft video
converter does a nice job with the files.
Anyway, to answer the questions asked:
Yes I saw it in the stream also on one of my computers. By in
the stream i mean the output window had a delay. On different
computer I did not see this delay. Unfortunately, I didn't install
the AAC plugin on that machine so I never produced a file that I
could flatten and test. So it could just boil down to that
particular machine. Though I have no idea why. The machine is a
monster with tons of RAM, SCSI disks and plenty of cores.
@fmeuser The files I did test did not have the problem prior
to bringing them into Premier. They looked great in AMP.

Similar Messages

Processor requirements for Safari?

For my first foray into Apple Discussions, I am going to ask what is probably a very stupid question, but here goes...
After updating the software on my OLD iMac at work (to OS 10.4.7, Safari 2.0.4), Safari will not launch. I get one of those "Safari unexpectedly quit-other applications not affected" error msgs every time. The guys from our IT department took a look and told me that this version of Safari will not run on a computer as old as mine. (I have exactly the same stuff on my iBook G4 at home and it works great.) They downloaded Firefox and told me to use that. Is this for real? Does Safari have processor requirements above and beyond the OS? Everything else seems to be working OK. And if it really is true, can I uninstall the new Safari and install an older version?
Thanks!

Hi nildem, & welcome to apple discussions
Safari is bundled with os x 10.4.7, if the computer can handle the os it can handle Safari
Mac OS X Tiger 10.4.6 tech specs
Requirements
•Macintosh computer with a PowerPC G3, G4 or G5 processor
•Built-in FireWire
•DVD drive for installation
•256MB of RAM
•3GB of available hard disk space (4GB if you install the developer tools)
Try a test account to see if safari works there.
Did you apply Mac OS X Update 10.4.7 Combo PPC which os did you update from?
Did you run disk permission repair before & after the installation of the update.
Home~/Library/Logs/Crash Reporter-> Safari crash find the most recent crash and post it.
Eme: )

Processor requirements may be out of date

I am trying to decide what computer to buy so that I can use Creative Cloud, in particular, Premiere Pro. Looking at the requirements, the processor is specified as "Intel Core2 Duo or AMD Phenom II processor with 64-bit support". Well Intel is beyond the Core2 Duo. I'm wondering what the actually processor requirement is. I just can't believe that it is as specific as this, especially since I haven't seen any new computers out there with these processors.
Could someone please update the system requirements so that I buy the correct software. I have been putting this off because of this.
Thanks!
-Karin

The problem is the Adobe video apps (or DVA's) use hardware in very specific ways. You're not just going to go and find an off-the-shelf model that really works well unless you go to some of the high-end Dell or other rigs designed for video editing. Unless you or someone that builds/maintains systems for you knows the stuff to be able to tell which model is a good start but then tacks on the right alternate gear. How much hardware do you need ... and what's your budget? These are all questions none of us other users can tell you.
Those last two short paragraphs of my previous post really do give the info that you, your computer savvy friend, or the dude at the shop or over-the-phone will need to probably get you something decent. I'll just note ... many gamers think just get a good gaming machine, they can really make video fly, right? Um ... maybe. A lot of the better gamer rigs use AMD video cards ... but the Adobe apps are still more comfortable in the nVidia video cards. They're much better about working with AMD cards, but it's often easier to get them working well with nVidia. And the disc read/write in/out problems for video post-production are vastly greater than anything a gamer will encounter, so a lot of gaming machines are not really designed to run a ton of hard-drives.
So, again ... 6 or more cores to the CPU. At least 16Gb RAM, more if possible, but DON'T load up on RAM and skimp on say a motherboard without a lot of disc connections on the motherboard (mobo). A mobo with connections for at least 6 SATA II/III or Thunderbolt hard-drive connections is wise. For external ports, in order of desirability ... Thunderbolt, sSATA II, or USB3, as USB3 is vastly lower sustained throughput (data in/out) than the other two. An nVidia video card with at least 2048MB (2gigabytes) of video RAM, and 1500 or more "CUDA" cores.
For drives ... if possible, 256GB or larger SSD for your system drive (operating system & programs, the "C" drive). Another SSD of 256Gb or bigger for cache files is good. Past that, adding 2 terrabyte or better 7200 rpm drives to fill the machine and your budget.
If you've got four internal drives past the system & cache drives, if someone could set up a 4-drive RAID 0 or RAID 5 "array" for you that would be excellent. Or an external pre-built hardware RAID array over a Thunderbolt connection could work very well.
Use this data to go through specs on machines you'd consider, or to hand to someone you enlist to get a machine chosen/modified for you. I know the "parts" stuff, but wouldn't know much more than you about how it all goes together. I've got a business partner who's a wiz at this ... I give him specs like above, he goes to Newegg for putting together a prospective machine and gives me the cost figures, then orders the parts & builds me a machine.
I'm assuming you'll either look for pre-built computers with the specs given, or have someone do what my builder does. And I wish it was simpler. Perhaps on the Hardware Forum someone would know of a currently available reasonably priced model from a decent computer company that you could just order. You'd have to ask over there.
Neil

Call of Duty 4 Processor Requirements.

I am Thinking about getting Call of Duty 4 for my Mac Mini. But the system requirements says I need to have a 2.0 ghz processor, but I have a 1.82 ghz processor. Could I still play the game or will that be a big factor?

Here are the specs:
System Requirements
Mac OS v10.5.4 or later
2Ghz or faster Intel Core 2 Duo processor
1GB of RAM
9GB free hard-disk space
ATI Radeon X1600 or NVIDIA GeForce FX7300 video card
128MB of VRAM
DVD drive
Mouse and keyboard
Broadband or LAN connection for multiplayer mode
Supported video cards: ATI Radeon X1600, X1900; Radeon HD 2400, 2600; NVIDIA GeForce 7300, 7600, 7800, 8600, 8800; GeForce Quadro FX 4500

Processor Requirement for SBS2008

Hi there!
A customer of mine is trying to install SBS2008 on a DL380e Gen8 server. Was reading thru the hardware requirements from the Technet library and some questions came up.
The hardware requirements would have been written some ways back, most probably referring to processors that were available when the OS came out. So when it says the minimum requirement is for a 2ghz processor, does it specifically mean a single-core
processor? What would be the impact of today's multi-core processors? For example, the DL380e Gen8 had a single E5-2403 quad-core processor running at 1.8ghz - will that still not meet the requirement and we will not be able to install SBS2008
on it?
Thanks for the help!

Thanks, Larry. My customer was having doubts because of the 2Ghz requirement that they saw here - http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc527594%28v=ws.10%29.aspx
I was assuring him that he may be looking at outdated requirements, and that the Xeon E5-2403 would be more than sufficient to run SBS2008.
He was even hoping someone from Microsoft will be able to shed light on that.

Mac processor required for PSE 8

Simple question for which I haven't found a straight answer:
Will PSE 8 run on a G5 with OSX 10.5.8?

No, sorry. If you look at the system requirements:
http://www.adobe.com/products/photoshopelmac/systemreqs/
the very first one is:
Multi-core Intel® processor
PSE 8 will not run on any PPC machine, which what your G5 has. PSE 6 should be fine, though.

Reducing memory & processor requirements of OS X

Does anyone have any suggestions on how to reduce the memory requirements of OSX on machines with limited Ram?
I have OSX on a (unsupported) powerbook 3400c. 144MB ram. Yes its slow. about 6 minutes to boot up. Anyways, the only reason I have "shoehorned" X (Jaguar) onto it is to use it as an MP3 server for my home stereo system with a new enough version of itunes that adjusts for differing mp3 recording volumes. It now also has a 20GB HDD in it, and yes OSX Jaguar. But OS X is a ram & processor hog. This machine is distictly lacking in both.
SO, I am wondering which features & other items a person could disable/turn off etc which would reduce the memory & processor load on the old powerbook. As the aqua interface has many subsystems running, there must be some which can be disabled etc which would "relieve the strain" but leave basic functionality.
Anyone who has any suggestions, please do so! Its fun breathing life into an antique mac. Might also help make my old original iMac a decent email machine one day too!
Thanks!

Hello! Have you experimented with opening activity
monitor and then selectivly quitting processes? Tom
No tom I haven't I assumed there were no other processes running at the time, as I only had the system & itunes running. I will however have a look & see. Thanks!

Processor requirements for illustrator windows

i have a dell dimension 2100 w/512ram and an intel celeron processor. i didnt see it on the requirements list. will it work and if not can I upgrade it or replace it.

You did not mention which version of Illustrator you intend to run on your machine, but let's assume it's the latest -- version 13 (CS3).
If so, my advice to you is to buy a new PC.
Assuming you're running Windows XP or Vista, it is possible -- by a slim margin -- that Illustrator 13 will actually install and run on your machine. However, it will be an exercise in frustration.
The Celeron is just a feature-crippled Pentium, so it is, technically, a "compatible" processor. However, based on info I was able to dig up on the 2100, the fastest Pentium you can install is a 1GHz processor -- assuming you could even find a P3 processor.
At 512MB, you're already at your machine's maximum memory capacity, and that's woefully low for this kind of work, and especially for Illustrator.
My guess is that you're also working with a very slow hard drive that's running out of space.
Nope... don't even think about trying to upgrade your 2100. Donate it, whip out your credit card, and get a modern PC.

Processor requirements for PE8

Hi. I ordered a new computer which will be delivered this week. I bought PE8 to use on it so I could burn HD video from a Canon Vixia HFS10 camcorder. I just noticed, though, that it says the system requirements for PE8 include a 3.0 GHz processor. My processor is only a 2.66 GHz. But it is an I7-920 quad core processor with 9 GB of RAM. Anybody know if I am going to have problems burning blu-rays with this? I am going to run Windows 7. Thanks.

The processor speed listed in the minimum requirements is for a single core (Pentium) processor. Your quad core will likely runs several times faster than that and should be more than powerful enough to work with Premiere Elements.
The bigger issue is that you list 6 gigs of RAM, which seems to imply that you'll be using the 64-bit version of Windows 7. There you might run into problems. Premiere Elements is a 32-bit application, and some people are experiencing problems trying to interface with 64-bit drivers for it on Windows 7.

Elements Mac processor requirements (revised)

Which versions of Elements will run on Macs with Intel Core 2 Duo processors? Requirements thru v 10 only say "multicore processors"; v11 requires 64 bit processors. I assume all versions thru v10 will run on Core 2 Duo processors, but will v11? I assume these processors are only 32 bit, but I am not sure.

The Intel Core 2 Duo processor will work with Photoshop Elements 11. I had it working on a Intel Core 2 Duo 2.8 ghz processor successfully. It is the Intel Core Duo processor which is a single core processor.

Processor Requirements for using Photoshop on a laptop

I am buying a laptop. There are inexpensive machines with the Celeron processor or the AMD-V series. These are both single core processors.
A salesman at a computer store, Microcenter, said that Windows 7 is written for dual core processors and if I tried to use a single core processor for applications like Photoshop it would become very slow.
Is he telling the truth? Also, he said that the AMD Ahtlon II processor runs hot. I had this problem years ago with AMD desktop processors. He said that the AMD Turion runs better.
Also, can I go with a standard graphics card, or can I just use what comes with the computer. I purchased a Presario CQ56-115DX but have not taken it out of the box.
The salesman was pushing me to upgrade to an Intel dual core chip.
Thanks

There's an old saying: Good / Fast / Cheap - pick any two.
Modern Windows depends on an unprecedented number of processes running simultaneously. A multi-core processor is a good idea.
-Noel

PSE8 Processor Requirement

Minimum processor speed for PSE8 is listed as 1.6 GHz on the Adobe web page, but the retail box says 2 GHz. One of my computers is 1.8 GHz, Pentium 4 with 1GB RAM. Is that good enough?

It will run but may be a little sluggish. Download the free trial and give it a whirl. Adding another 1 or 2 GB of memory for $30 to $60 would likely make a significant improvement.

Recommended Graphics card and processor for Equium L20-264

Hi,
I was wondering what graphics cards are compatiable with equium l20-264 because i have a standard ATI eXpress radeon 200M (rubbish) and wanted to upgrade my graphics card but i am a beginner i have upgraded my ram but really need a upgrade for my graphics card for a batch of games for vista (you are probably thinking how i got vista on a non-vista laptop ^_^)
I also wondered if i coould upgrade my proccesor to a better one something like 1.0 GHZ to 2.5 GHZ but a celeron one so i don't have to get a new motherboard.

Hi
I will not recommend any graphic cards for this unit because its generally not possible to replace or upgrade the graphic card chip on the notebooks.
The CPU upgrade could be possible.
The CPUs on the newer generation of notebook motherboards are not soldered and it could be possible to remove it.
BUT the CPU upgrades are not advisable because
- firstly you will lose the warranty and
- secondly the notebook could run unstable because of the higher temperature.
However, I found some compatible Intel Celeron-M CPUs which are supported by motherboard:
Intel Celeron-M 350 (1.30GHz) FSB: 400MHz
360 (1.40GHz)
370 (1.50GHz)
380 (1.60GHz)
bye

My computer does not have the processor requirements for Flash 14. I can not play any videos or do school work. What version can I get with a processor of 2.1GHz?

I need a version of flash that will allow me to watch videos and have access to school before July 2nd. What version can I download to do this and how do I download it? I am getting frustrated.

here are older versions, Archived Flash Player versions

Hi all ,anyone knows some usefual Codecs for H.264 live video/audio

I'm headache about the JMF codecs ,they are too few ,and seems inefficiency, anyone knows pure java codecs for H.264 or MPEG4 ?And I think it's better a open source one ,do my thanks , guys!

Here are some basics....
FMLE creates RTMP protocol streams that PCs and Macs watch with Flash players. iOS devices don't understand RTMP (Flash), only HLS delivery of 10 second chuncks of downloaded video playback. Both systems understand H.264 video, but iOS wants to see AAC audio not MP3.
You didn't state how you are live streaming, meaning what bandwidth delivery service you are using. Live streaming only via RTMP won't get you to successful iPad and iPhone HTTP Live Stream. On-demand delivery to iOS devices normally requires .mp4 video files to be hosted, which Macs and PCs also understand via RTMP delivery. But unless your delivery service can convert .f4v or .flv files to .mp4 on the fly there is no easy way to to get to iOS via the direct file output of FMLE as of today. Sometimes we upload live encoded project files to our www.Wistia.com account for PC, Mac and iOS delivery. This is a YouTube / Vimeo paid type hosting service for on-demand only.
Some commercial CDNs (Content Delivery Networks) today allow an inbound live RTMP into their system using FMLE. Then they re-mux that RTMP stream into HLS delivery for iOS. Some work well using the native MP3 audio codec (Internap), but most require FMLE to have the AAC audio codec installed from Main Concept for $200. Or people use Wirecast from Telestream which is $500 per license to be able to run two instances on that one license.
In my 15 years of being a big commercial webcaster here in Silcion Valley, I have yet to find the perfect simple and easy and affordable RTMP to HLS live and on-demand delivery system. We currently do it different ways with multiple providers depending on the job. More offerings are coming out now and we try them all as they come down the pike.
Harvey Louie
Event Compression Group

Processor requirements FMLE h.264

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for