Prodn. order settlement

Dear Friends,
we have done the order settlement of period April (i.e.period 1 for fiscal yr 2008) as well as May (i.e.period 2 for fiscal yr 2008).
Now the issue is that our user has not shown the consumption of one of the raw material for FG produced in the April month and now they have done the consumption against that order with posting period of May.
so how can I reverse the order settlement for this particular order.
we have tried through KO88 with different permutations but it is not allowing to do the same.
please revert for this issue as it is on priority basis.
full points will be awarded for the relevent answers.
Regrads
Amitabh

Hi Amit,
You have to cascade the reversals; first reverse May then you can reverse April. I checked out the ERP financials forum and if you search for the 'settlement reverse'  thread there, you will find details.
Warm Regards,
Sreekant.

Similar Messages

  • Error in conv Pl order to  prodn order

    Hi,
    I have a created a sales order and after MRP run the planned orders were generated
    when converting the planned ord to prodn ord the following message appears
    Message no. CO684
    Diagnosis
    The component cannot be allocated to an individual stock because make-to-order production and engineer-to-order production cannot be executed with this order.
    A possible cause is that you are trying to create an order with reference to a sales-order/project, where an account assignment to a sales order/project is not allowed in the settlement profile that is assigned to the chosen order type. This is inconsistant.
    System Response
    The following responses are possible:
    Order processing is cancelled.
    The system resets the special stock indicator back to the original value.
    Procedure
    Choose another order type.
    pls advice how to sort it out
    Regards
    Anand Srinivasan

    Hi  Anand,
    Check the settlement profile defined for your order type at OPJH.
    Goto OPKT-> settlement Profile-> select ur settlement profile defined at OPJH (PP01) -> Change  "Sale order =  settlement is Optional" under  Valid reciever tab.& save
    Now convert the planned order to prod order.
    Ihope this will solve ur problem.
    Pegards
    Pradeep

  • Prodn order costs to cost center

    hi,
    we are doing prodn order process. IS there anyway where we can assign a cost center to the order while confirming? I need to get the order cost to a cost center to be able to run assessment cycles.
    Regards,
    Rashmi

    Go to Product cost controlling --> Cost object controlling --> Period -end clsoing --> Settlement --> Create settlement profile.
    Give cost center as settlement allowed then you can seelte to cost centers and do assessment.
    Assign points if helpful

  • Sales Order Settlement to Only WBS

    Hi,
    I have scenario like Sales Order Settlement to only WBS in make to order.
    Again from WBS settlement to COPA.
    So far I know WBS settlement to COPA and I am not sure in the 1 st scenario.
    Can you any body tell me where I need to configure, is it only settlement profile or any other settings required?
    Thanks & Regards,
    KBR

    Hi,
    What is the business rational to have a 2 step settlement to COPA?
    Thank you and Regards,
    Varshal Kachole

  • KO8G open work order settlement

    Hi,
    I am facing an issue with open work order settlement using KO8G or KO88.
    We are on 6.0 and PSM turned and New GL activated with a document splitting on fund mandatory flag turned on.
    When open work orders undergo WIP calculation through KKAI, it shows the the calculated amount in the GL account but when we execute KO88 or KO8G to settle this open work order amount to the GL, it gives me the below error
    GLT2201 "Balancing field "Fund" in line item 001 not filled"
    On debugging the KO88, its seen that the field fund does not flow in from the work order.
    This means that both my P&L accounts and my balance sheet accounts that offset the WIP posting does not have the fund field (which is a mandatory field for posting any document in the system).
    Has anyone come across such a situation?
    Any help would be appreciated.
    Thanks,
    Pradeep
    Edited by: Pradeep Giri on May 30, 2009 4:07 AM

    Hey Vanessa,
    Sorry i have been really busy with work off late. I just got a moment and wanted to thank you for the help.
    I found a solution for it, we had FMDERIVE default the fund on the accounts used in WIP settlement as they are dedicated for those process.
    The cost is picked from the order and deposited on the P&L account which is now attached to the fund and this is further transferred to the balance sheet account with the fund information.
    Problem solved.
    Do you see any other implications on this?
    Thanks again.
    Pradeep

  • Open Work Order settlement - KO8G or KO88

    Hi,
    I am facing an issue with open work order settlement using KO8G or KO88.
    We are on 6.0 and PSM turned and New GL activated with a document splitting on fund mandatory flag turned on.
    When open work orders undergo WIP calculation through KKAI, it shows the the calculated amount in the GL account but when we execute KO88 or KO8G to settle this open work order amount to the GL, it gives me the below error
    GLT2201 "Balancing field "Fund" in line item 001 not filled"
    On debugging the KO88, its seen that the field fund does not flow in from the work order.
    This means that both my P&L accounts and my balance sheet accounts that offset the WIP posting does not have the fund field (which is a mandatory field for posting any document in the system).
    Has anyone come across such a situation?
    Any help would be appreciated.
    Thanks,
    Pradeep

    Ashok,
    Thanks for the reply.
    We have a user exit to populate the order during its creation. this means the fund field is already residing on the order. so during settlement process, closed orders dont have a problem but when open orders are subject to settlement i.e WIP settlement, the cost on the order is not transferred to the GL account because of the fund missing as our financial statements should be balances by fund.
    Do you think an user exit can suffice this ? have you ever tried or come across such a scenario.
    Thanks
    Pradeep

  • Using a different Sender GL in Internal Order Settlement

    When we settle an Internal Order from GL/Cost Element 1 to Fixed Assets, we get:
    Dr: Fixed Asset
    Cr: GL/Cost Element 1.
    For various reasons, we do not want to Credit the original GL/Cost Element but rather another one.
    Does anyone have any sugestions as to how this can be achieved?
    Thanks.

    Hi
    Can you tell me what is meant by "Internal Order from GL/Cost Element.."? 
    As per the functionality, when you settle an internal order, something is moved from the intrnal order and put to another.  Hence the place from where it is moved is credited and the receiver is debited.  The internal order has postings through the cost element you have posted.  So the movement is from what the internal order has in its account. 
    Order settlement is done through a secondary cost element created and this cost element is used for debiting and crediting the sender and receivers.  Hence your idea of using a totally different GL/Cost element (of course that do not have postings with respect fo the internal order in question) is not practical, I hope.

  • For internal order settlement rule amount column is requied instead %

    Hi Gurus,
    For internal order settlement rule percentage is there but business wants  to settle from AUC to final asset by amount wise how can we do this.
    I tried to change the investment profile but it is coming amount field while saving it is not displaying.
    Please help in this regard
    Thank you.
    Ranganadh

    Hi
    Check the path
    IMG>Controlling>Internal Orders>Actual Posting>Settlement>Maintain Settlement Profile>Maintain Settlement Profile.
    Here there is a tick for amount settlement under Indicators. You need to maintain this check box for your requirements.
    Regards
    Sanil Bhandari

  • Error while doing production order settlement

    Hi frds,
    When I am doing the production order settlement, I am getting the following error
    " There are no accrued amounts; settlement is not possible".
    The status of the order is TECO CNF DLV PRC BASC BCRQ GMPS MANC.
    Rajnish

    Rajnish,
    Please check if there is cost balance for the order, to me it looks like the order is already settled. In the order display mode (CO03) menu bar Goto->Costs->Balance.
    If balance exists then the problem may be related to the settlement period used in the Intial screen of transaction KO88. Please check the cost incured period and use the same period as settlement period.
    Regards,
    Prasobh

  • Production order settlement in case of non valuated material

    Hello guys,
        Our client wants some of the materials have to be non valuated. These materials are raw materials and SFG also. We can assign UNBW material types to those materials.
       I have created one material for test purpose. It doesn't contain the accounting view so as no valuation class. BOM of it , doesn't contain any component as client doesn't want to show any consumption on production order.While creating the order for that material system asks for the settlement rule. I skip that step and create the order. I do GR for the same.
      My question is, is production order settlement essential for these orders? What if we don't settle the order. No activity type has been assign to the work center.
      Kindly give ur valuable inputs.

    Hi,
    No need to create material as UNBW type.
    Normal ROH, HALB, FERT material type we can achieve this.
    In the BOM of FG or SFG goto  item detail screen there is a tick mark in costing.
    Remove the tick by OS23 - BOM status.
    Now you can do your production as regular. But cost will not get update.You can do regular settlement also.
    Regards,
    Dharma

  • Re: Issue while doing Order Settlement

    Hi Experts,
    I have completed the goods reciept step for a process order.
    Now I am trying to do the following steps for the order settlement.
    1.Calculate Overheads using Tcode : KGI2 - Individual Processing
    CO43 - Collective Processing
    2.Calculate WIP using Tcode : KKAX - Individual Processing
    KKAO - Collective Processing
    3.Calculate Variance by using Tcode : KKS2 - Individual Processing
    KKS1 - Collective Processing
    4.Finally do the settlement of Order in Tcode : KO88 - Individual Processing
    CO88 - Collective Processing
    I am not able to do these steps.
    KGI2: the screen is appearing  without any details,but there is no error message.
    KKS2: Here all the cost are coming zero.
    KO88: I am getting this message: There are no accrued amounts; settlement is not possible.
    Please advice.
    Regards,
    Vivek

    Dear,
    Message no KD256??
    You will just check for customization settings for accrual calculation ie cheak for settelement to fiin the result analysis version and check posting rules
    Maintain the config in OKG8 for RA category "RUCR".
    Check this OSS note 179533
    Also check order previously settled?
    Regards,
    R.Brahmankar

  • CCS Details are not getting updated to COPA in Sales Order Settlement(VA88)

    Dear Experts,
    Our scenario is MTO with valuated material.
    1. Production order is tagged to Sales Order.
    2. Production order is settled to Material and variance is getting posted to COPA.
    3. At the time of Delivery, COGS Debit (Cost Object- Sales Order), Credit - Inventory.
    4. At the time of Billing, Accounting Document is getting generated, COPA document is not getting generated.
    5. We  are not executing WIP. (as per Business process)
    6. Settlement is done thru transaction code VA88. COPA Document is getting generated.
    I am facing the following issues in the above MTO process.
    1. At time of sales order settlement thru VA88, In COPA, only COGS is getting as updated with one value field i.e. Material Cost.  Cost Component data (Material Depreciation, Labor etc..) is not getting updated to COPA.
    2. When I settle the Sales Order thru VA88, Billing Quantity is not getting updated to COPA though Quantity field mapping is done properly.
    Please help me how to resolve the above issues.
    Note: Same Cost Component Structure, we are using for Make to Stock scenario. Cost Component Data is getting updated Properly to COPA  (at the time of Billing)
    Regards,
    vgl
    Edited by: vglokam on Aug 31, 2010 10:52 AM
    Edited by: vglokam on Aug 31, 2010 10:54 AM

    Hi
    1. CCS (Cost Comp Split) wont be updated to COPA if you settle via sale order.. In sale order, COGS cost element is posted.. the same will get settled to COPA as one single value...
    In MTS, the CCS gets updated to COPA upon billing because of the "valuation" strategy customization... Billing posts to COPA in that case, COPA gets Sales Qty and it is valuated with CCS to give you the break up.. But, in your case, Billing is not posting to COPA, but to sales order.. hence, there is no qty flow into COPA upon billing.. thats why you dont get CCS for MTO
    2. The sales qty should be updated to COPA upon VA88.. For this, make the following settings in your PA transfer structure which is used during VA88
    1. Go to KEI1, Select your PA transfer structure...
    2. Add an assignment line in it... Check on "Qty Billed/Delivered" in the assignment line
    3. In the Tab "Value Field" below "source", assign Qty Field
    Now when you settle, it should update qty as well
    regards
    Ajay M

  • PM Order settlements - Difference between the amounts settled

    Hi All,
    This is regarding the PM Order settlements.
    Every month end finance team run KO8G and settle the PM Order costs for that period (month). In the process the Orders are settled using a variant, which captures all the orders that has changed/created during the focused period.
    But in the report S_ALR_87013015 - List: Actual Debit/Credit there are balances for previous settlements and thereu2019s a difference between the amount settled and the debit/credit amounts.
    When drilling gown we found that this is due to following reasons,
    1.     Some orders are not settled fully.
    2.     Equipments issued against a Order are returned after the settlement process
    Ex: one Order has settled in Oct 2008 initially and fully in Jan 2009. However one material has been returned to stores in February 2009. Therefore a difference (cost of the material) between total actual cost (Dr Amount) and settled amount has been arisen.
    The Orders of nature 1 will be captured and settled in the subsequent run of KO8G.
    But my question is how can we address the orders of nature 2? Changing the settlement variant is one option.
    Also appreciate if someone can explain the SAP-best practice of PM-Order settlements.
    Thanks,
    Thushantha.

    Hi Thushantha,
    After returning the material to store check the actual cost of maintenance order. Once you fully settle the order means it becomes zero.
    When you will return material to warehouse against maintenance order once again carry out settlement of maintenanc order then check for your nature 2.
    Sundar

  • Assiging wbs element as settlment receiver in service order settlement

    Hi PM CS Experts.
    We are using scenarios of creation of service order from sales order. So whatever cost we incurred for service order settling to sales order via settlement rule - settlment receiver is Sales order i.e. SDI. We are using settlement profie XX which have default object type for settling SDI.   While releasing the service order the settlement rule created with settlement receiver is SDI.
    Now for different business scenarios, we are settling service order cost to WBS. Now we want to create a settlemetn rule for WBS, settlement receiver will be WBS element,  while saving the service order.  What configuration, master data or processes we have to follow for this.
    please reply on this.
    regards
    abhay

    Sales Order line item have account assignment WBS element. From this sales order line, a service order will be created.   So our idea is whatever cost booked to service order should be settled to wbs element instead of sales order.  
    also in location tab of service order, the wbs element from sales order is not inherrited in account assignment section.  Why this we are not knowing. Have you have any idea for this.
    regards
    abhay

  • Process order settlement

    Hi,
    when i do process order settlement , system gives error message that "maintain the settlement rule of the sender".
    Process order contains two co-product and i have given details in "joint production" in MRP II tab.
    When i checked order settlement rule in COR2 i couldn't find anything and when i try to insert new settlement rule system gives error message .
    Sunoj

    error message when executing KKS2
    KV     206     1     OIT 20000095/1     No suitable settlement rule found for object OP0000200000950001          Checking and processing orders

Maybe you are looking for