Product ID Compatability

Can I use:
com.democratandchronicle.rochestermagazine.february2012
In the guide it says:
Under Details, specify a Reference Name and Product ID. This Product ID must be identical to the Product ID you use when publishing the folio. Use the “com. publisher.publication.folio” format, such as “com.adobe.dpstips.overlays.” For best results, use all lowercase letters for compatibility with folios that will also be avail- able for purchase in an Android Market app.
But on anroid development site it says you can use numbers. Any thoughts?

Yes, you can use numbers as well. It should say "you can use numbers and lowercase letters."

Similar Messages

Product Key compatibility

We recently ordered a product key for crystal reports xi. We were told by the sales department that this key would work for crystal reports 8. The key did not work for crystal reports 8. I have tried to contact support and they pointed me to this forum. Any help or suggestions would be appreciated.
Thank You

Hi,
You will get the further details regarding the license keys from CIC (customer Service).
CIC (Customer Interaction Center) Numbers
You can use Customer Interaction Center to submit support requests and service requests for problem messages and remote service postings.
Use the Customer Message Wizard to enter problem messages on SAP Service Marketplace. If you do not have online access, the relevant Support Center can create a message on your behalf.
Call the following number:
+49-6227-744969 (available worldwide)
Business Objects customers:
Contact information for Business Objects # new support telephone numbers, all numbers available 24 hours 7 days a week
Please revert in case of any further queries,
Regards,
Deepti Bajpai

Future WLI Product release, compatibility with BPM

Regarding Integration and BPM products from BEA I have the following queries:
1) What is the next major release for Weblogic Integration product and what Enhancements will be there?
2) Which BEA product is going to have Business Process Management (BPM) functionality supporting BPEL Server and BPEL designers?
3) How BEA differentiates the BEA AquaLogic from BEA Weblogic Integration?
regards,
neeraj
?:|

Miklos:
There's really not much you can do after the site has been published to reduce the png's. But before, there are some changes you can make that will help considerably.
1 - do not use any borders, etc. around photos.
2 - don't use any reflections.
3 - create your own navigation bar with linked text and turn of the iWeb Navigation bar. The nav bar is all png based.
4 - use only the web safe fonts from the Font pane.
5 - turn off smart quotes
6 - do not use drop shadow on fonts.
The above will reduce the number of png files associated with a web page considerably. You can run a test with a test site and publish to a folder. Then follow the hints above and publish to another folder and compare folders.
One way to handle multiple sites is to use iWebSites. It lets me create multiple sites and multiple domain files. If you have multiple sites in one domain file here's the workflow is used to split them into individual site files with iWebSites.
For me it makes updates several sites and publishing only one very easy.
Do you Twango?

CS3 Production Premium compatibility with Windows 7 Premium 64 bit?

I am starting to think that CS is not compatible with Windows 7 Home Premium 64 bit.
Can anyone confirm this?
If so, is there a way around it?

I recommend you expand your search to include the Photoshop forum. Some people there have bene running W7 ever since the first Public Beta was released and they may know which buttons to push. It generally seems to work, though, so your issues are probably caused by a specific combination of hardware, drivers and system libraries eitehr missing or not being installed correctly.
Mylenium

BT broadband powerline extender compatability

Hi I already own a pair of BT 500 flex seris broadband powerline expanders and very nice they are to I have read that to add to my growing network any of the 500 range products are compatable also Arch and Simpler powerline adapets but not Comtrend.
My quary is I have the chance to buy a pair of BT 200 seris powerline adpaters and was wondering if these are also compatable to mix and match with the 500 seris products.
Also would the talktalk powerline adapters also work with the BT 500 seris products.
Thank you for any time given in offering help.

Now resolved. I did not follow the instructions in exactly the right way so I will outline where I went wrong in case someone has the same issue.
If the Data light stays off even after a reset then after it is correctly plugged into the wall socket:
1. Press the Linkbutton on the extender for 5-8 secs then remove finger from the button and wait for the power light to go back to steady green.
2. Press the Linkbutton again, this ime for 1 second.
3. Within 2 mins press the Linkbutton on one of the Home Hubs for 1 sec to complete the connection.
Hopefully the power and data lights on both the Extender and Home Hub will be back on.
The key thing I did not do was remove my finger from the Linkbutton after 5-8 sec on part 2!
Apologies for posting such a very simple error, but who knows it might help someone in a similar predicament!

A realistic assessment of your experiences of hardware needed for the type of editing I do please.

Introduction:
I apologise for the length of this post but from experience of reading here, I'm working on the principle of the more I explain about myself now, the less anyone willing to help me will have to ask later.
I have lurked around this forum on and off for a few years, read the various threads in the FAQ section, particularly PPBM5 and What PC to build thread and other related topics around what system to build. I have found them very useful and in particular have enjoyed reading about Harm Millaard's experiences First Ideas for a new system. For about about 12 months I've been delaying upgrading my PC but in Mr Millard's latest updates on his PPBM6 site he talks about new systems and provides a link to Intel's time line which suggests they are in no rush to replace the i739xx series CPU chip - which has I believe amongst other things 2 cores disabled. Normally bitter experience has taught me not to rush out and buy the latest technology but let others "test" it first and then benefit from reduced prices as that model is replaced. However, it now seems like last years technology is going to remain as this years technology and probably the first 2 quarters at least of next year and, if anything, the price of the i739xx series is at best staying at it's existing launch price or even rising. So it's time to take the plunge for me and upgrade.
My current hardware for editing:
I started with Premier 6.5 after I bought it as part of a bundle with a Matrox RTX 10 card - one of the most temperamental pieces of hardware I've had the misfortune to work with. I later upgraded to Premiere Pro 1.5 and edited with that using a Pentium 4 2.6 (overclocked to 3.2), 3 hard drives (no raid) and 4G of memory. The video footage used was avi recorded using a Canon MVX 30i and Panasonic NVGS27 and now I've added the Casio Exilim EX -FC100 (mpeg format) and a Panasonic HDC S90 (AVCHD).
My PC coped with the editing I did with avi footage but couldn't handle AVCHD format and this convinced me to upgrade to Premiere Pro CS5.5. At the same time I switched to editing on a Dell XPS M1530 (Centrino duo chip) - I upped the memory to 4GB, put Windows 7 64 bit home edition on and replaced the existing hard drive with a faster one. In addition I use a SATA Quickport duo attached to my laptop via an eSATA card. However, either the Quickport, eSATA card or XPS is extremely temperamental - I never see two external hard drives, 50% of the time see 1 external drive or none at all - when that happens I edit around it doing things I can with just the one internal drive - but this problem is not my question.
The type of editing i do:
I know people usually say around here not to try editing on laptops and believe me, I understand why, but using this setup I have been able to edit lots of videos - see here for examples of the type of editing I currently do:
http://www.youtube.com/user/PathfinderPro
The equipment test videos place the biggest strain on the hardware when editing. And, to do this editing I have to convert my AVCHD footage in to it's YouTube format before editing and even after I've done that it can be tediously slow to edit and playback even with premiere set to play at 1/4 normal quality. To convert the AVCHD footage to the YouTube format I edit in has to be done over many nights.
Now I am not a professional, I typically edit with up to 4 tracks of video with additional tracks for titles and my target audience is YouTube - which is why I can get away without editing in my prefered option of native AVCHD video format. However, I'm tired of all the waiting, stuttering, and many many days and hours of converting videos into a format I can use so I'm looking to upgrade. My problem is though I'm uncertain what path to take. The PPBM results are dominated by overclocked chips, and whilst the motherboard make and model is listed, the hard disks used, graphic card makes and models and memory modules are not. This is not a criticism of the PPMB tables (big thank you to Bill Gehrke & Harm Millaard for taking the time and effort to pull this much information together) but for me, I am not interested in being in the top 1000 in the world, nor overclocking like mad, and having had horror experiences of using matrox products and compatibility and stability issues with other hardware I'm more interested in compatability and practicality than speed when deciding what to build. I've also read the threads about marvel controllers, dual and quad channel memory support, the pro's and cons of SSD or standard drives, raid setups, the heat problems with overclocking the newer ivy bridge chips and general build advice etc so I'm not coming here without having done some reading first.
The type of system I'm thinking of:
So far based on what I've read here, I've come to the conclusion - but I'm open to suggestion:
- Chip - regrettably due to the cost and unlikely successor anytime soon - a 39xx (with appropriate cooler) because I want to edit in native AVCHD which seems to require the warrior type chip as opposed to the "economical" build regardless of what my target audience is and this suggests
- X79 motherboard (which must have an old PCI slot such as the Asus Sabertooth and which has room for the cooler I'm considering). As I will be carrying over my old terretec DMX 6 fire 24/96 soundcard - all my videos have their audio mastered in Audition using this card - best piece of advice I read was the audience will watch a bad video with good sound editing but not the other way round)
- 4 hard drives plus additional hard drive for operating system using onboard raid controllers (not sure whether the operating system drive will be WD caviar black or SSD and can't justify cost of external raid controller for either my type of use or number of hard drives being used)
- Video card - I can now buy a GTX 580 for less than the 670 - so not sure on the card especially based on Harm Millards observations that memory bandwith seems to be as important as CUDA cores
- Case - I have an Akasa 62 case with room for 5 hard drives - I won't be exceeding that, and if I overclock it will only be by a little so is it really necessary to replace it for a Tower Case - although I would prefer a case with a front connection for esata so I may have to change the case regardless
- Maximum memory 32G - so is it necessary to upgrade to windows 7 professional?
- Power source - I'll work out when I've decided on my components.
Help please:
For me it's video source/dictated software chosen and hardware/audience(youtube) dictates format edited in. As I don't intend to change my camcorders format (AVCHD or mpeg) in the next couple of years and I'm not interested in having the "fastest" system around what I'm really interested in learning is:
what system setups people use now for doing similar editing to me
what make/models of the component parts in your system work well together
and if you do have a bottle neck in terms of hardware, where is it and what hardware would you change to (not a dream model change, just a practical and realistic one)
I have deliberately not given a budget for the changes I'm intending because budget should not be the deciding factor in determining what I "need" to upgrade to for the "type of editing I do" - especially bearing in mind I've got by so far (admitedly at a tortoise pace) with by todays standards a standard spec laptop. Basically I don't want a Rolls Royce to go shopping at Wallmart but I'm tired of walking there and carrying everything back by hand!
Thank you very much for any help / experiences people can share.

Thank you both for your prompt and helpful replies.
Mr Millaard, regarding your excellent article Planning and Building an NLE system, I have read it a couple of times now and it was your article which finally convinced me the time was now to upgrade but within it you said for good reason "Initial choice of CPU: i7-39xx with the intention to overclock to 4.6 - 4.8 GHz", hence my uncertainty about the CPU to use. I have seen a video you posted here - I think it was based on your cats (which I incidently enjoyed) so working on the editing done there (but not remembering if you mentioned what video format you used) and others who have mentioned many pro's for the i7-39xx I was leaning towards that - but I'm financially relieved at least - if the i3770 will do, although now with the possible recommendation by JEShort01 (sorry not sure of the forum etiquette for use of names) of the 2600K overclocked I'm a little bit back in the position of which is more suitable especially with the update to the i3770 being nearer than i7-39xx. This still makes me lean towards the i7-39xx.
Regarding the editing, the match play you can see on the channel is indeed 1 camera basic edits - multiple titles used to provide the score board. However, the coaching videos use mulitple cameras - 3 to 4 sometimes (another reason for upgrading to CS5.5 for the multi cam editing support) and the equipment testing video can use 3 or 4 tracks layered on top of each other other with each track having opacity settings and multiple motion effects and titles with occasional keying video effects added. For example this video at approx 2 mins 50 and 5 mins 10 seconds.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T1E5T7xo57c&list=PL577F7AB5E31FC5E9&index=13&feature=plpp_v ideo
Monitor wise I use dual monitor setup. My laptop screen and I link out to an LG M2394 D for widescreen and I sometimes use an old Neovo F-419 for 3 / 4 editing. I won't be using more monitors than 2. If the 580 drops a bit more I'll probably go for that - although I'll have to make sure it's size isn't an issue for the motherboard combo setup. Interestingly there is a thread shown on the forum home page which discusses the 570 vs the 660ti and the opinion was go with the 660ti which surprised me a bit.
Windows 7 professional it is then - I should have known that too - apologises for asking a question already asked.
"Accepted, your correct criticism of the lacking hardware info on the PPBM5 website. That is the overriding reason that for the new site http://ppbm7.com/ we want to use Piriform Speccy .xml results to gather more, more accurate and more detailed hardware info."
No criticism intended Mr Millaard - more an observation and I really look forward to that evolution with PPBM7. I'm assuming the .xml results will use pre populated drop down lists people can select their hardware from - that way you can control and ensure consistent entries - downside being the work required by you to populate the lists in the first place and maintain them.
Thanks again for your help but I'm still unsure a bit about the CPU and video card though.

Speakers/charging dock combo for iPod Nano?

I have a 3rd party home speaker dock, which works as a speaker, but didn't realize that the new Nanos don't let 3rd party stuff work as chargers. When the Nano is connected it says "charging is not supported with this accessory".
What are my options in terms of docks that would both charge the Nano, and work as a good set of speakers (with good volume)?

larselarsen wrote:
Unfortunatly Apple are not being precise nor correct in their information regarding which systems work (charges) the Ipod Nano G4 ....
There are literally hundreds if not thousands of accessories not made by Apple that claim some level of iPod compatibility. It is impossible for Apple to supply comprehensive data about which ones work with which (if any) iPods. Newer products sporting Apple's "Made for iPod" logo indicate that the manufacturer (not Apple) certifies that it meets Apple's specifications for iPod compatibility, but that does not necessarily mean it supports all features with all iPod models, especially charging the Nano 4G, & latest iPod Touch & iPhone models.
Some accessory manufacturers now specifically list which iPod models each of their products supports in product literature, at their websites, or on the packaging. If so, be sure to check for any fine print or footnotes to make sure all the features work with a particular model! If you can't find this info, your best bet is to buy a product from a vendor with a good return policy or contact the manufacturer directly & request specific, detailed compatibility info.
Note: there is a lot of confusion about the "Made for iPod" logo. To display it, a manufacturer must pay Apple a fee & sign a non-disclosure agreement to get access to the technical details that ensure compatibility with current iPods & timely notifications of changes in the specifications that might affect compatibility with future models. Apparently, notifications about the changes to the charging specs went out to participants quite some time ago, perhaps as early as 2005, but very few accessory makers have done anything about it until now. Of course, non-participants have always reverse-engineered their products for compatibility without Apple's help, so it is probable that they knew nothing until the new iPod models were on retailers' shelves.
Complicating things even more, some manufacturers market both newer & older versions of some products under the same model name, or just slightly change the model name (like with a "II" suffix).
The bottom line is "newer is better" but is in itself no guarantee that the accessory will charge the Nano 4G.

How to add a 2nd hard drive to HP Pavilion DV7!

How to add a 2nd hard drive to HP Pavilion DV7-3165DX, product # WA794UA or WA794UAR.
(1) Order HDD, hard drive, hardware kit. HDD hardware kit includes mounting rails, static shield, screws, rubber isolators, and SATA to motherboard cable. Check your model & Product # for compatibility.
HP Parts HDD hardware kit 517639-001 for DV7-3165DX product# WA794UA and WA794UAR.
(2) Consult Drives - Windows 7 PDF, table of contents, 7 Replacing a drive in the secondary hard drive bay. This will show you how to install a 2nd HDD in a HP DV7.
Drives - Windows 7 PDF
(3) In Windows 7 select Computer, Select the HDD installed, Format (if not already formatted).
(4) If HDD does not show up in Windows 7 under Computer, go to Start (Menu), Search Programs and Files, enter "Computer Management", select Storage, Disk Management (Local), look for the Bay 2 HDD (should show up as Disc 1, Bay 1 HDD should show as Disc 0), Format the 2nd HDD (The one you just installed).
Update: I have the 2nd HDD (WD 1TB) installed, Windows now recognises it after completing the steps I mentioned in step 4, Format with default allocation NTFS 931.51GB free, 118MB used for formatting. Format with default allocation exFAT 931.51GB free, 1MB used for formatting. I selected NTFS format to reduce file fragmenting.
This question was solved.
View Solution.

When i added my 2nd HDD I was ready to get it ordered and shipped, so it would arrive before I arrived home. I also was not sure if it would be offered anywhere else and be 100% compatible. The quality of the factory HP part is good. Since then I found a cheeper source. Newmodeus DV7-3xxx Hard Drive Caddy $27.95 +tax +shipping. Not sure if the quality is the same. If this helps you, post your results and kudos.

Freetalk Conference for Panasonic TV's

Just under a week ago I bought the Freetalk Conference device for my Panasonic TV. I have received the item today via Instore Shop, It does not work with my TV despite it being sold as doing. I am struggling to find out who I need to speak to resolve this and get the item sent back for a refund.
Can someone please help as the after sale support and service from Skype seems non-existant?
Regards

Having the same issue with a Panasonic Blu Ray player and Freetalk webcam purchased on through the Skype Shop, via a third pary that distributes the freetalk webcam. Panasonic technical support told me that they do not provide support for webcams and recommended using the Panasonic branded webcam. The freetalk customer support has be nonresponsive to this issue. I believe that there is an issue with the compatibility of the freetalk and Panasonic products, however no one is willing to fix this issue and Skype continues to market these products as compatable. Frustrated as well!

Panasonic tv's

will a flash player, ever be made available for a Panasonic TV

Having the same issue with a Panasonic Blu Ray player and Freetalk webcam purchased on through the Skype Shop, via a third pary that distributes the freetalk webcam. Panasonic technical support told me that they do not provide support for webcams and recommended using the Panasonic branded webcam. The freetalk customer support has be nonresponsive to this issue. I believe that there is an issue with the compatibility of the freetalk and Panasonic products, however no one is willing to fix this issue and Skype continues to market these products as compatable. Frustrated as well!

JDeveloper 11g - Exception when trying to run on Tomcat 5.5.20

I am trying to get an application working on JDeveloper 11g Technology Preview (4524) using Tomcat 5.5.20 as the server (NOT the Oracle embeded server), so that I can run and debug on Tomcat from JDeveloper. I can deploy to the Tomcat server but when I try to run the application (entry point is loginfos.jsp), after selecting the runtime service as Development Runtime Service (Tools > Select Runtime Service > Development Runtime Service (Packaged Deployment), I get the following error. Any ideas what might be wrong.
Target fos-app.jpr is not runnable, using default target loginfos.jsp.
oracle.jdeveloper.cm.CMException: Cannot find presentation for JSR160 in this ConnectionWrapper instance
     at oracle.jdeveloper.cm.JndiConnectionWrapper.getPresentation(JndiConnectionWrapper.java:118)
     at oracle.jdeveloper.asnav.ASConnectionWrapper.getPresentation(ASConnectionWrapper.java:60)
     at oracle.jdevimpl.runner.adrs.AdrsConfigAdminJMX.<init>(AdrsConfigAdminJMX.java:55)
     at oracle.jdevimpl.runner.adrs.AdrsAdmin.getAdrsConfigAdmin(AdrsAdmin.java:187)
     at oracle.jdevimpl.runner.adrs.AdrsStarter.getAdrsConfigAdmin(AdrsStarter.java:606)
     at oracle.jdevimpl.runner.adrs.AdrsStarter.prepareToStart(AdrsStarter.java:239)
     at oracle.ide.runner.RunProcess.prepareToStart(RunProcess.java:847)
     at oracle.ide.runner.RunProcess$1.run(RunProcess.java:803)
java.lang.NullPointerException
     at java.util.Hashtable.put(Hashtable.java:396)
     at java.util.Properties.setProperty(Properties.java:128)
     at oracle.jdevimpl.runner.adrs.AdrsStarter.generateJndiProperties(AdrsStarter.java:729)
     at oracle.jdevimpl.runner.adrs.AdrsStarter.preStart(AdrsStarter.java:704)
     at oracle.jdevimpl.runner.adrs.AdrsStarter.start(AdrsStarter.java:258)
     at oracle.ide.runner.RunProcess.startTarget(RunProcess.java:871)
     at oracle.jdeveloper.runner.JRunProcess.startTarget(JRunProcess.java:529)
     at oracle.jdeveloper.runner.RunningProcess.startTarget(RunningProcess.java:78)
     at oracle.ide.runner.RunProcess$1$1.run(RunProcess.java:809)
     at java.awt.event.InvocationEvent.dispatch(InvocationEvent.java:209)
     at java.awt.EventQueue.dispatchEvent(EventQueue.java:461)
     at java.awt.EventDispatchThread.pumpOneEventForHierarchy(EventDispatchThread.java:242)
     at java.awt.EventDispatchThread.pumpEventsForHierarchy(EventDispatchThread.java:163)
     at java.awt.EventDispatchThread.pumpEvents(EventDispatchThread.java:157)
     at java.awt.EventDispatchThread.pumpEvents(EventDispatchThread.java:149)
     at java.awt.EventDispatchThread.run(EventDispatchThread.java:110)
#### Failed to start Application in Development Runtime Instance.
Thanks
RayC

Hi,
JDeveloper 11 is in early technology preview and has not been tested outside of OC4J yet. In a nwer preview that then will be closer to production, those compatibility test should be run.
Frank

SQL Server 2005 SP4 not installing correct on Server 2003

Everytime I attempt to install SP4 on my Server 2003 system it states it goes through successfully but when I reboot it hasn't done anything.
Summary Log states all is successful for version 9.00.5000.00 (0 Errors, SQL Support: Passed, Summary: Successful)
after reboot or even before the sqlserver.exe shows its still version 9.00.4262.00 and still shows up in Microsoft updates and doesn't show the install at all in Add/Remove Programs
I'm at a complete loss on what to do.. I've tried the RTM download and the Auto Update method both with same results. Tried shutting down all services in relation as well. I'm lost

Time: 01/30/2015 14:24:13.797
KB Number: KB2463332
Machine: *CLEARED*
OS Version: Microsoft Windows Server 2003 family, Standard Edition Service Pack 2 (Build 3790)
Package Language: 1033 (ENU)
Package Platform: x86
Package SP Level: 4
Package Version: 5000
Command-line parameters specified:
Cluster Installation: No
Prerequisites Check & Status
SQLSupport: Passed
Products Detected                         Language Level Patch Level       Platform Edition
Setup Support Files                       ENU
9.4.5000 x86
SQL Server Native Client                  ENU                 9.00.5000.00 x86
SQLXML4                                   ENU
9.00.5000.00 x86
Backward Compatibility                    ENU                    8.05.2312
x86
Microsoft SQL Server VSS Writer           ENU                 9.00.5000.00 x86
Products Disqualified & Reason
Product                                   Reason
Processes Locking Files
Process Name          Feature               Type          User Name
PID
Product Installation Status
Product                   : Setup Support Files
Product Version (Previous): 5000
Product Version (Final)   : 5000
Status                    : Success
Log File                  : C:\Program Files\Microsoft SQL Server\90\Setup Bootstrap\LOG\Hotfix\Redist9_Hotfix_KB2463332_SqlSupport.msi.log
Error Number              : 0
Error Description         :
Product                   : SQL Server Native Client
Product Version (Previous): 5000
Product Version (Final)   : 5000
Status                    : Success
Log File                  : C:\Program Files\Microsoft SQL Server\90\Setup Bootstrap\LOG\Hotfix\Redist9_Hotfix_KB2463332_sqlncli.msi.log
Error Number              : 0
Error Description         :
Product                   : SQLXML4
Product Version (Previous): 5000
Product Version (Final)   : 5000
Status                    : Success
Log File                  : C:\Program Files\Microsoft SQL Server\90\Setup Bootstrap\LOG\Hotfix\Redist9_Hotfix_KB2463332_sqlxml4.msi.log
Error Number              : 0
Error Description         :
Product                   : Backward Compatibility
Product Version (Previous): 2312
Product Version (Final)   : 2312
Status                    : Success
Log File                  : C:\Program Files\Microsoft SQL Server\90\Setup Bootstrap\LOG\Hotfix\Redist9_Hotfix_KB2463332_SQLServer2005_BC.msi.log
Error Number              : 0
Error Description         :
Product                   : Microsoft SQL Server VSS Writer
Product Version (Previous): 5000
Product Version (Final)   : 5000
Status                    : Success
Log File                  : C:\Program Files\Microsoft SQL Server\90\Setup Bootstrap\LOG\Hotfix\Redist9_Hotfix_KB2463332_SqlWriter.msi.log
Error Number              : 0
Error Description         :
Summary
     Success
     Exit Code Returned: 0

My cursor disappears, and now Photoshop crashes in Mountain Lion

Apple, apple, apple! PLEASE fix the obvious bugs in Mountain Lion. I am a professional using Photoshop on a Mac for the last 20 years, and now your operating system has me and MANY OTHERS in despair becasue we can't work. Lots of professionals in despair on the Adobe site.
Adobe has built to your specs, and now you have bugs. Please fix them as a matter of priority. Apparently buying the newest Photoshop - CS6 - doesn't fix this either.
1. Cursor disappears when using brushes, and changing the size of the brush. This persistent problem makes it impossible to work with brushes - like a moron is stealing your bursh every minute, rendering it invisible.
2. Upon deleting my Photoshop preferences, it was briefly fixed, then returned.
3. I tired uninstalling , then shutting down and restarting, then reinstalling Photoshop - now the whole program crashes - apparently I have discovered ANOTHER known bug in Mountian Lion. Here's a quote from an Adobe employee - at least they will talk to me -
"that's another issue -- and a bug in the OS code It was trying to draw a control, and failed when it tried to get the font size information -- we've seen that OS bug before, but I didn't realize it was still a problem in 10.8."
So now my 1,000 dollar software is rendered useless on the OS I just paid for.
Not good enough Apple. This is your sutuff up, you should fix this as a matter of urgency.

raydsr wrote:
same problem here. Mountain Lion is terrible with Photoshop and Pro Tools.
apple, please listen and fix these issues or give us back Snow Leopard.
You can go back to Snow Leopard if you wish. It is still available. Adobe are responsible for their own products and compatability, Apple are responsible for theirs. In saying that, I have had no issues with Adobe CS4 or 5 nor 6 with either Lion nor Mountain Lion. Perhaps you need to uninstall CS and reinstall.
Pete

MOTU Interface Issue: Audio Not Reading In Host Software

Greetings. I'm in need of help. I'm using my MacBook Pro for live studio recording and it receives audio from a MOTU UltraLite Mk3 Hybrid Interface via Firewire cable.
The Audio Reads in the System Preferences Sound Input Level Monitor But Not in Host Software.
Although the audio signal from my mixer is making it to the interface (can see levels)and the audio from the interface is making it to the computer (can see on system preferences "Sound" input level monitor)it is not being read on any host software I've tried which includes: AudioDesk 3.02, Garageband, Cubase 4.1, Audacity, and Adobe SoundBooth CS3.
Note: Output (for playback) is set to go through the MOTU Interface and works well.
Here's an Overview of the machine's Hardware:
Model Name: MacBook Pro
Model Identifier: MacBookPro4,1
Processor Name: Intel Core 2 Duo
Processor Speed: 2.4 GHz
Number Of Processors: 1
Total Number Of Cores: 2
L2 Cache: 3 MB
Memory: 3 GB
Bus Speed: 800 MHz
Boot ROM Version: MBP41.00C1.B03
SMC Version (system): 1.27f3
Serial Number (system): W8*
Hardware UUID: 21BCA47D
Sudden Motion Sensor:
State: Enabled
Any advice is greatly appreciated. But please note that I've followed all instructions provided by Apple, MOTU, and all set-up instructions for host software and I've also disconnected the MOTU interface and recorded directly into the MBP and it worked fine.
< Edited by Host >

Well, it's nearly 2 years later... and this part of the problem mentioned in the link you provided is exactly what I'm experiencing!
Yea it is rather interesting from a couple of perspectives. One being that MOTU seems to be pretty diligent about their products and compatibility issues (just from reading through their "Tech Notes" at http://www.motu.com/techsupport/technotes.html). Also, I found that if you go to one of their product pages like "UltraLite-mk3 Hybrid Overview" (http://www.motu.com/products/motuaudio/ultralite-mk3) you can then click on the Tech Notes link (http://www.motu.com/products/motuaudio/ultralite-mk3/technotes.html)and that will narrow the results to Tech Notes that mention that specific product.
Researching off the tech notes and the info you provided, I did find other users with similar problems, but nothing really as conclusive as the link I suggested in the previous post. Also, of note, is that reading trough some of the search results, I realized the "whole ball of wax" can get quite complicated and goes well beyond my knowledge of the issue and the technology involved.
All that being said, have you tried contacting MOTU's tech support (http://www.motu.com/techsupport/)? Just by their documentation, they seem to be on the ball - might even have a ready answer. Like any vendor, they may have specific issues that they have not heard or dealt with before, but their website structure and content does seem to suggest they take an interest in getting their products to work across a myriad of tech environments and use cases.
Hope this helps.

Tracker 0.8.3 and file content indexing

Hi forum,
yesterday I decided to reinstall meta tracker for indexing my system but I had some problems: I don't need to index file contents, I just want to index file names and the possibility to tag files. But in the tracker config dialog there isn't any kind of check box for disabling the content indexing. Does anyone know how to disable file content indexing and why is this option disabled in tracker 0.8.3-1?
Thanks,
Rief

Hi，
A product compatibility is determined by 3 parts:
The product has passed Windows certification requirements and received a logo.
The app publisher or device manufacturer stated this products works with Windows 8\8.1\RT\7....
Windows 8.1 is designed with compatibility in mind.If an app or device ran on Windows 8, our goal is that it should run on Windows 8.1. During Windows development, we test most of the popular products and we are providing compatibility statements based
on this testing. For products we have not tested, compatibility statements for Windows 8.1 are being provided based on the product's compatibility status for Windows 8.
Microsoft will also take user's feedback into account and make updates accordingly, so it might take some time to update a status.
Yolanda Zhu
TechNet Community Support

Product ID Compatability

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for