Production against sales BOM.

Sirs,
I have a scenario where I want to produce against a sales BOM. As in I get the sales order for a material and then I want to produce directly this FG with a sales BOm maintained for sfg's for the material. System should allow me to pick a reference routing in the production order. Is this possible?
Thanks,
Ariel.

Hi there ,
You can do the production from the sales bom if you maintain the same allowed in the config. check the T-code : OS20...
Let me know if you have any further quey in the same
Thanks
Kaushik

Similar Messages

Production against sales order

Hi all experts,
I am creating a report for Linewise width wise handover
summary(OK production against sales order)
I am taking Date from MKPF and QTY from MSEG
I need to show Work Center [ CRHD-ARBPL ]
but dont know how to link tables
can any one send me the code and link btween MSEG and
CRHD or any other table which having ARBPL field linking with
MSEG.
Thanx in Advance ......

Hi,
CAUFV and AFKO tables are linked with table CRHD. These two tables are related to order. You can try these tables to get the desired data.
Regards
Amit parkhi

Rework Order after QC Rejection......for Production against Sales Order

Hi All,
Can you help me in the following issue.........?
I have Make to Order production scenario. After Production Order is confirmed material goes for QC inspection and some quantity get rejected ( need rework).
Since I have confirmed total quantity in order confirmation, if I create a rework order with reference to the sales order that will increase the production qty by the rework qty. But I need a rework order to rework on the rejected quantity.
Let me know how to resolve the issue.
Thanks and Regards,
Samar

Hi!,
From your mail it seems that you are doing quality inspection on GR (inspection type 04). Please carry out following steps:
1) At the time of quantity posting on usage decision please put rejected quantity in field against retuen to vendor (i.e. carry out 122 movement for the rejected material). By doing this you will find the delivered quanity on prod order reduced by the rejected quantity.
2) Now create a production order without material (CO07) for the rejected quantity and put the original order as cost receiver in the settlement rule so that all the cost incurred during rework will be settled on original order.
3. Confirm the origianl order / Final operation again for the reworked quantity and make the GR again. This will again create a new inspection lot.
4. Carry out the result recording and UD for this new inspection lot.

Purchasing a Sales BOM

Hi,
Has anyone got any suggestions on how the following can be achieved?
We have several partcodes that relate to kits, these kits contain serveral partcodes that are otherwise available singularly.
A kit will have its partcode and serial number and all child products within with have their individual partcode and serial number.
For the purpose of Sales & Support we would like to be able to sell the products as a Sales BOM thereby having a record of each product in the kit.
However we cannot have a Production or Sales BOM on a Purchase Order to the supplier as SAP does not allow this.
So how using SAP can we purchase a Parent Child structure and then Sell the same Parent Child structure in order to record all the details in the transaction?
I look forward to hearing from you.

hi! for the purpose of purchasing, you can purchase the partcodes individually. although, you cannot purchase it in a paren-child structure, this way, you can purchase the partcodes and the kit and have it available in the system. once the items are available, whether parent, child or the Sales-BOM can now be used in sales. on the other hand, when you use a production BOM, your sales document will not reflect a parent-child structure in sales documents. only the parent item will be reflected in your sales documents.
hope this helps!

Use of Sales BOM to force ATP against Bulk Material?

Background:
Our business was recently acquired, and we have migrated to the parent company's R/3 system. In our previous MRP system (R/2), we planned, produced, and shipped a single bulk Material ID in Trucks, Rail Cars, Flexi-Bags, and Iso-Tainers. In the new system, specific Material IDs are now required for each of these modes. However, we do not store the inventory in these modes, nor do we wish to plan at this detailed level.
Considered So Far:
Initial suggestion was to use A.T.O. to look through a BOM and automatically create production orders for each customer order. However, this seems to add additional complexity that we do not really need, and makes changing order dates more challenging (have to move both the order and the accompanying Prod. Order).
Desired Outcome:
Order is entered and priced based upon the mode-specific Material ID, but inventory is relieved from the Bulk material. In our previous R/2 system, there was a field on the material master called "Std.Prod." which stood for Standard Product Link. We used it for synonymous products where we produced and inventoried under one name, but sold under several different names. The customer materials were set up as type SALE and referenced the inventoried material, set as type FINI, in this Std. Prod. field. Thus, at the header level, the user saw the SALE material, but for planning and at the batch level, the system showed the FINI.
Options?
I am told that, due to the amount of custom coding and user exits surrounding outputs and interfaces to EDI and other external systems, the use of Material Determination would require too much testing and potentially too much development work. But, is it the best / correct solution to the problem? Because right now, I don't have the ability to perform ATP against the inventoried Material, so nothing confirms. Would the use of a 1 to 1 Sales BOM offer anything different?
Many Thanks in Advance,
J.P.

Hello JP
Material Determination (MD) works with Consignment orders, only you need to assign a MD procedure to the requisite sales document type in config ( TO code OV14). Product substitution, which is a specialized form of MD, makes use of special item cats like TAX and TAPS or TAPA and TAN for main and substitute items respectively, but you can always make copies of them and use them with consignment orders also in conjunction with item category usages like PSHP. PSEL, PSA1 and PSA2. There could be resultant issues, but unless you test you won't know them all.
Your second question about 'Sale would go against the finished good (Truck / Rail material) while the production costs go against the Bulk', brought a new realization in me. You are ordering, pricing and delivering Truck or Rail materials, but those requirements have to be converted to Production orders for bulk material, so from a Sales and Distribution (SD) point of view you don't need anything extra, therefore work with you Production Planning (PP) consultant to convert the requirements at PP end?? May be without resorting to MD or BOMs in Sales, you can work with your PP consultant and with standard config or custom development, you may realize your desired outcome.
Also as long as cost is maintained in the sales Material (Truck for example) with due regard to the additional costs in converting Bulk to truck, you should be fine. Follow the example below:
Standard cost of 1 ton , say X, is stored in Bulk Material master.
Now if there is no additional cost and you just load the bulk material into a truck and if a Truck is 10 ton, then Truck material would have 10X in its material master for cost.
But if there is some other material and/or labor involved in converting bulk to Truck and their cost is y, then you will have (10x+y) in your truck material. Also it is worthwhile to capture the additional cost in the Production/Assembly order via components and operations.
Your problem is not insurmountable, but you need to assemble a team of SD. PP, MM and CO experts to design an integrated solution for you.

Production order no. against sales order no.

hi
i want production order no.(AFUNR) against sales order no.(VBELN) .
    i searched in TABLES : AFKO, AFPO, VBAK, VBAP.
     BUT problem is that in all 4 tables field is common but in (AFKO, AFPO ) there is no value for SALES ORDER (VBELN) , and vice-versa.
    plz guide me.

AUFNR (Internal Order) is an account assignment element used mainly in FI/CO.
In SD, accounting detail is often generated at the billing stage.
Check the billing documents associated with the sales order and see if they provide the link (VBRP, VBRK).
Andrew

Sales bom vs production bom

hi
not sure if this problem has a solution, but i just wanted to crosscheck.
we have a number of items that was wrongly created to start with as production bom's when they should have been sales boms. we are forced to create production orders for them. i know that once we create an item as an inventory item, it cannot be changed anymore.
is my only alternative to created a new item number for all of these items? can you think of any other way around this? a new part number is going to create a lot of headaches around!
thanks
prem

Hi Prem,
You understanding of once we create an item as an inventory item, it cannot be changed anymore is not completely true. Only if you have transactions to tie them up, that will become true. Suppose you have just made production orders for half of them, you can remove the other half to reduce your headache.
In case of locked items with transaction, there are legal issues behind it. Even though it is by mistaken, you're not allowed to say I never done it.
Thanks,
Gordon

Purchase reports for components of production BOM Based on Its Sales BOM

Hi all
I have sales BOM and the components of Sales BOM are production items having Production BOM and the components of production BOM are purchase items
My problem is when i create a sales order for my Sales BOM, i should be able to get a report for purchase items that is how much i have to purchase with out using MRP
pls anyone help me with approbriate queries
Thanks and Regards
Boopathi.T

Hi Boopathi,
You may try this one:
SELECT Distinct T1.Code, SUM(T0.Quantity * T1.Quantity) 'PO Qty', T2.DocNum
FROM dbo.RDR1 T0
INNER JOIN dbo.OITT T3 ON T3.TreeType = 'S' AND T3.Code = T0.ItemCode
INNER JOIN dbo.ITT1 T1 ON T1.Father = T3.Code
INNER JOIN dbo.ORDR T2 ON T2.DocEntry = T0.DocEntry
WHERE T2.DocNum LIKE '[%0\]%'
GROUP BY T1.Code, T2.DocNum
Thanks,
Gordon

Sales BOM on FERT creating planning request in production on HALB!

Hi,
Have an issue with creating a planned process order from an Sales BOM...or...
I have one HALB material that is created in a large portion in a storage tank based on requests from the sales order.
This HALB material should then be devided up into different process orders for filling due to different labels, packaging, etc...
The issue is that we have bulk deliveries which we would like when creating a sales order on the FERT the planning and the process order should be created on the HALB material. So no process order should be planned on the FERT material but it should be planned and produced on the HALB material together with the other requests of same HALB material...
Do anyone have any idea on how we should do this settings??
Any suggestions are welcome...
BR,
Christian
Edited by: Christian Gasslander on Apr 14, 2010 2:29 PM

You can achive it using User exit or BAPI..
Check BAPI - /SAPAPO/SDP_REL_SNP

Costing against Sales Order

Hi,
We are manufacturing a FERT material with strategy 20 MTO Production. we create a sales order and against sales order we run MRP to generate a planned order, then we convert the planned order to production order. Our entire planning is based on sales order. When we release the production order the cost is getting calculated but when we view cost itemization the material cost is not getting planned or updated inspite of having proper BOM.
Pl any one guide us to solve the issue.

Hi,
First Calculate the planning cost of that material with Costing Run : CK11n and check there material cost and other cost. If these cost exist in that then definatly u will get in production order. Again cross check component material master. ( In costing view : material origin must be Tick, in BOM and routing - costing relevance indicator must active.
Regards,
Sulabh

Plant to plant subcontracting against sales order

hi
my scenario is like this
two plants A and B under one company code, its repair scenario in this sales order come in plant b ,in this repairing we have 5 process out of which one process has to be carried out in plant 1,so for that we will do subcontracting against that sales order with plant b. so how to handle subcontracting with plant a against sales order.
Edited by: AMIT RANE on Mar 4, 2009 7:55 AM

Purpose: - Subcontracting is also possible in conjunction with sales order The subcontracting orders are account-assigned to a slaes order . Thus, the components are not transferred (using a transfer posting) to the "stock of material provided to vendor" but are directly withdrawn from the sales order stock the time of the goods receipt. The material manufactured is also posted to the SO
The cost of subcontracting is then debited to the SO.
Since the components are not transferred to the "stock of material provided to vendor", it is recommended that you use a transfer posting to transfer the provided components to a new storage location (for example, 9999). This enables you to obtain an overview of those stocks that are physically located at the subcontractor. This information is particularly important when you carry out a physical inventory of the Project stocks.
Features: -
Withdrawal from Stock of Mat. Provided for Project: -
For components that are managed in Project stock, you can define whether the components are to be withdrawn directly from each Project or from the stock of material provided to vendor. You manage this via the dependent requirements indicator for individual customer requirements and collective requirements (MARC-SBDKZ).
You can maintain this indicator in the following places:
In the MRP view of the material master record (MRP 4)
In the explosion types for the BOM item (in Customizing for Production in the step Basic Data -> Bill of Material -> Item Data -> Define explosion types)
Configuring the explosion types has priority over the configuration in Inventory Management.
If the indicator is set at Collective requirements only (2), the materials are withdrawn from the stock of material provided to vendor. If this indicator is set any other way, the system withdraws materials from Project stock.
Regarding Subcontracting Challan: -
Go to OMJJ, select the field "movement type" and press enter
Enter movement type "311" and double click on "Field selection (Enjoy)" under Dialog Structure on left side.
here "New Entries" and add field "LIFNR" (Vendor- plant as vendor )
Now in MIGO, at the time of transfer posting of components using movement type "311 E", specify the vendor code of the Subcontracting PO (i.e. Subcontractor)
Now create Subcontracting Challan in J1IF01 for material document of 311 E movement type.
Also check in SPRO > Logistics - General > Tax on Goods Movements > India > Business Transactions > Subcontracting > Maintain Movement Type Groups > here for Movement Type Group "0001", Movement Type "311 E" should be maintained.
Then do GR against PO and refer the Subcontracting Challan here.
And then do reconciliation in J1IFQ for the GR Document against Subcontracting Challan.
Also check in SPRO > Logistics - General > Tax on Goods Movements > India > Business Transactions > Subcontracting > Maintain Movement Type Groups > here for Movement Type Group "0002", Movement Type "543 E" should be maintained.
Follow the below mentioned process;
Process Steps: -
1. OX09 - Create Storage Location as "9999" for Subcontractor Location
2. MB1B - Do Transfer Posting of material from RM Warehouse to this Storage Location via movement type "311 E" (Instead of doing 541)
3. Now go to J1IF01 - here use material document of movement type "311 E" and create Subcontracting challan. (If required)
Prerequisite: - In SPRO > Logistics - General > Tax on Goods Movements > India > Business Transactions > Subcontracting > Maintain Movement Type Groups > Here for Movement Type Group "0001" (For issues), maintain movement type "311 E" also along with 541.
Rest all; refer subcontracting challan during GR and then reconciliation and completion, etc... Will be same as usual.
Note: - At the time of GR, consume components from storage location "9999" (for 543 movement type)
regards
KI

Manual Creation of PO against Against Sales Order AAC - M

Dear Gurus ,
I am facing issue that , as in MTO scenario some of the components in my BOM material is not fixed and they can be known after some time like labels of finish goods , now i want to create Manual PO with reference to sale order AAC is M , but i found that when MRP is creating purchase requisition , G/L account in acc. ***. tab is stock G/L , but when i am creating manual PO it is taking G/L from GBB Acct modification VKA (account as in acc. assignment cat. is M.)
But I want it should take G/L from BSX as it is taking in case of MRP generated PR against same sales order.
Thanks & Regards,
Akshay

Dear Sir ,
As here we are taking valuated stock against sale order , we are using account assignment category M and requirement class with valuation M and account assignment category M , as per bellow link.......
Valuated Sales Order Stock Configuration - ERP Financials - SCN Wiki
now i am facing problem , when MRP is creating purchase requisition , G/L account in acc. assignmrnt. tab is stock G/L from BSX which is right , but when i am creating manual PO with respect to same sales order , it is taking G/L from GBB Acct modification VKA (account as in acc. assignment cat. is M.)
But I want it should take G/L from BSX because stock is valuated stock.
Thanks & Regards,
Akshay

How to transfer sales bom from SAP R/3 to APO?

Hi Experts,
I just want to ask how to transfer sales bom from R/3 to APO? if i change my bom usage to 5 and use this BOM in my Production version be enough to send it to APO?
Also, this is my first time using sales bom, could you please help me understand how sales bom work in APO planning?
Thanks so much.
Mylene

Hi Senthil,
Thanks again for your reply. I was trying to CIF sales BOM in APO but only the header material are being created in APO. The component are not added in PDS. This is how I create it in SAP R/3:
1. transaction cs01 --> enter header material, plant and BOM USAGE =5
2. inside cs01, i entered components, quantity for each components and ITEM category = L (stock item)
i also eneterd base quantity for header material
3. create production version for header material with routing and this BOM
4. create and activate material CIF model for header and components
5. create and activate PDS CIF model for header and components.
After doing all these steps, PDS is created in APO but I only have the header material (no components)
I tried changing BOM to other bom usage and components were populated in PDS.
Am i missing nay steps? Thanks.
Regards,
Mylene

Creating a Sales BOM in SAP CRM 7.0

Hi All,
How to create a Sales BOM in SAP CRM 7.0 system? What is the transaction code for it ? I want to define a high level Package material in the BOM and 3-4 low level items in this BOM. What are the steps to achieve this ? We do not have ECC system connected to CRM and we are using CRM 7.0 as stand-alone system.
Thanks in advance.
--R D

Hi R D,
Please could you let me know how you achieved this. I am trying to do the same thing. But when I assign products in the component relationship, it does not explode when I use it in a contract. Please let me know if the solution you used.
Regards,
Neena.

3rd Part Dropship Scenario with Sales BOM

Hi
We have a 3rd Party Dropshipment scenario with Sales BOM with susequent Debit
Characteristics of Sales BOM
Sales BOM is created
Header Material is Valuated but non-inventorised (Accounting and costing view should exist)
Component Material is Valuated and inventorised
In Sales order, Pricing is done at the header material not at the components level
During Billing we get the COGS for the header material (cost coming from VPRS)
No VPRS exist at component level instead we have copy of VPRS just to capture the value in COPA for our reporting
Process
1. Sales Order created with Sales BOM exploded in sales order.
2. At the Item level Purchase requisition is created.
3. PR for the components is converted to PO
4. Vendor Delivers the components to Customer.
5. Statistical GR done in our system.
6. Invoicing is done in MIRO
7. We directly do the Billing. Billing is created at header level. Revenue and COGS is reported at Header level only.
We are stuck when we are doing the Subsequent Debit (can be for any unplanned cost). For Susequent Debit we are not able to report differential COPA at header level.
Normally whenever you do subsequent debit in case of 3rd party dropship for normal material, COPA document automatically attached to Billing. This is happening because of the behaviour of VPRS condition type. In our case VPRS only exists at header level and not at component level but replenishment is for components. Subsequent debit is also happening at component level. We need it to be reported at header level.
We need some solution to this.
Please advise
Regards
Neeraj
Edited by: NEERAJ BHARDWAJ on Dec 2, 2011 5:12 AM

Hi Raj,
Please clarified your requirement here, you mention that you wanted to valuated COGS at actual cost of PO? That sound more like actual costing here and what is the reason for this requirement?
Is this MTO with variant configuration?
If this is MTO with VC, Yes - we do cost Sales Order and here is the brief steps:-
Price Control S
a) Sales Order Creation - Normally when you save this will be costed and marked automatically. Note that condition type EK02 will represent the cost here
b) Run MRP based on Sales Order requirement which resulting planned orders, PR, etc
c) Convert PR-PO, Planned Order -> Production Order
d) Confirmations, GR on PO which valuated according to the SCE Costing in step a)
e) PGI will be based on the GR value on step d) which is also your SCE Costing
f) Any variance between PO and SCE need to be settle.
Thanks,
Ong Yang Lim

Production against sales BOM.

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for