Production finish date is later than order finish date?

In my company, most of the plan orders in MD04 have an exception message "64 Production finish date is later than order finish date". The plan strategy of the materials are 40. The plan orders are created from Scheduling Agreements or Independent Requirements. We set 'Scheduling' as 2(lead time) in the MD01/MD02. The self-production time in material master data is 0. The schedule margin code is 000 which all the parameters are 0.
For a example, we create a requirement on 2007.04.24. After MRP run, plan order generate. It's basic date will be 2007.04.24, but the production date IS 2007.04.25. All the plan order like that, the production date are always later than the basic date for one day.
Could someone tell me why? and how to settle this problem?
Thank you in advance!

Hi,
check scheduling parameters for planned orders and scheduling parameters
for production orders.In that set the various indicators like
adjust basic dates to order start date
do not adjust basic dates to order start dates and try.
Tcode opu3 / opu5
Thanks,
s.nandhakumar

Similar Messages

Request end must be later than req start date

Request end date must be later than request start date
Any explaination, what configuration I need to carry on to clear the issue
Regards,
Ajay

Hi,
I am also getting same error while I create a new service request. I have assigned the date rule for both start date and end date. Request start date is today's date and end date is today's date+3 days. i can see the dates on screen, but still when I save I am getting Requested end date must be later than requested start date. Please let me know am I missing something here.
Regards,
Reddy

Requested end date must be later than requested start date

Hi,
I am getting an error after the creating the support ticket as "Requested end date must be later than requested start date".
Please advise the solution.
Regards,
Rajesh Kumar.R

Hi Raj,
If you look for this message in DEBUG, youu2019ll find, that it is raised in functional module CRM_DATES_SERVICE_IR. That FM is called if your date type equals to constants GC_APPOINTMENT_TYPE-SRV_CUST_BEG (SRV_CUST_BEG) or GC_APPOINTMENT_TYPE-SRV_CUST_END (SRV_CUST_END).
So, I can say that itu2019s some kind of standard check inside CRM core, and you canu2019t turn it off.
And the workaround variants are listed earlier:
-     You can fill the date SRV_CUST_END with some rule as Mohammed has suggested (even with dumb ISM_INFINITE which will put 31.12.9999 and it will be obvious that user didnu2019t change it)
-     You can move to Z* date types, like you said, and checku2019s wonu2019t run
-     And finally, you can try to delete this error message using BADI method CRM_APPT_CHECK_DEPENDENCIES, CRM_APPOINTMENT_BADI (as I remember it runs after this standard check). But I wouldnu2019t recommend doing it, because CRM_DATES_SERVICE_IR could be called not only in this moment and errors could appear in random placesu2026
Best Regards,
Vadim Shmarin

The determined activity date 03/24/2009 must be later than the system date

Hello everyone!
I am creating a contract but this error message appears when I put a validity date: "The determined activity date 03/24/2009 must be later than the system date". Where in IMG can I adjust this? Thank you.

no one responded.

Update Date is older than the Creation Date

Hi Team,
In the Oracle Application 11i forms we are seeing the Update Date is older than the Creation Date?
But the creation date should be older then the updated date.
Thanks,

What 11i release are you on?
Can you please elaborate more on the Creation/Update dates mentioned above? Are you referring to forms or tables or specific rows? Is this happening to all data/forms? Please provide an example for us to understand your issue.
Thanks,
Hussein

Bill Date not later than PGI date

D/ Friends,
Suppose PGI date is 3.6.2010 & user is creating bill doc on 5.6.2010 but entering a date later than PGI date say e.g 2.6.2010. Now we want that sys shd not accept a manually entered bill doc date later than PGI date. I think, Iu2019ve made my issue very clear. So how to achieve this thru std. config? We know that thru ABAP a u201CZu201D chck is possible to apply for this scenario but we want to do it thru std. config. Pls help.
Thanks.

Go to VTFL, select the item category for the combination of your delivery type and billing type and maintain routine 011 for the field "Data: VBRK/VBRP". If you have already assigned a different routine, then add this code
VBRK-FKDAT = SY-DATUM"
Also the above routine will only propose the system date but it can be changed manually. In order to prevent this, you can make the date field as grey through billing exit USEREXIT_FILL_VBRK_VBRP (Module pool SAPLV60A, program RV60AFZC). By doing so, system will always system date (if you applied routine 11) or the actual GI date which cannot be changed.
thanks
G. Lakshmipathi

Get entries later than a given date

Hello,
I'm trying to implement a method wich will return me the entries from the service where the createdAt field is greater than the given Date. So i done this:
Timestamp timeDay = new Timestamp(2008, 5, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0);
try{
        nameFilter = new QueryFilter(name);
        dateFilter = new QueryFilter(timeDay, ">=");
        list = local.findByNameAndCreatedAt(dateFilter, nameFilter);
In the Service Browser I can see an Entrie with the Value
2008-05-08T12:49:50.380
So it must return me an result, but it doesn't, just an empty List. What am I doing wrong?
Greetings
Christoph König

The Problem was, that I generated the Timestamp from util.Date. when i create the timestamp for a GregorianCalender it works

Delivery Date Monitor Against Purchase Order Delivery Date.

Hi All
Forgive me if I've posted this in the wrong forum area but I'm fairly new to this and have spent some time looking for a correct area but still not sure??? Anyway........
....I'm wanting to know if there's a standard SAP Report or anything that can tell me which deliveries from suppliers are late or due. I can get out ABAPer to create me a new program to do this but I was hoping that there would be something standard.
I want to look at the delivery date on my PO's and if the date is less than or equal to today and the parts have not been Goods Receipted, display them. It would also be useful if we could see what was due in over the next few days.
Again sorry if this is in the wrong section but any comments or suggestions would be much appreciated.
Many Thanks
Chris

Complete.

Maintaine error message if posting date is greater than Sch del date in PO

I have maintained a delivery schedule in a PO for a material
Say PO qty 100
Del Schedule
10.04.09 - 60
20.04.09 - 40
While GRN, for 60 qty, if posting date is greater than 10.04.09, system needs to throw error.
I want to do it for selected materials only.
Is there a way to do this.
Regards,
Rakesh

Thanx for reply
If I use OMCQ message , it will be applicable for all GRNs and I want for a particular set of materials.
Can one please suggest User exits / BADi for the same. I have checkd BADIs but those are based upon MSEG and EKBE table.. and i dont have any material doc no before posting the document.
requiement is to check the delivery sch date and posting date befor posting the document is posted.
Any suggestions welcomed.
Reagrds,
rakesh

Trying to do date field greater than a specified date in condition editor

Hi All,
I am trying to build the XML predicate in the expression editor to check that the posting date sent is greater than a specified date to determine the reciever. I can get it to validate posting date is = to specified date, but when I change the = to > it fails to properly determine the receiver, when I send a valid document.
Below is the expression build
(/p1:ServiceAcknowledgementConfirmation/ServiceAcknowledgement[CreationDateTime>'2007-02-03'] EX )
has anyone done this type of check. I have it set as a date type for the expression.
Regards,
Chris

Hey all,
I tried >= 2007-02-04 and sent in that exact date. It failed. I removed > so that it is just = 2007-02-04 and it was successful. So, is >= an allowable operator?
Thanks,
Chris

GR posting date always greater than PO document date.

Dear SAP Gurus,
Am working on below requirement in a support project..
Need to ensure GR posting date always greater than in PO creation date. Only current month is open for GR posting and at present as a standard system allows to post GR any date in the current open period.
Is there any way, we can control the same via messages without implementing any exits or badis.
Appreciate immediate response.
Regards,
GM

there is no std sap for this
you can use user exit to ful fill ur requirement
in that u can write a code where is u can check all PO dated in GR must be eq to or less than GR posting and document date
hope this helps

Billing date comes later than PGI Date

Dear Friends
For a particular customer, billing date is getting generated two days after the PGI date. But for all other customers we are getting billing date on the same date as PGI is done. This problem is occurred soon after we have started invoicing through scheduling agreement instead of sales order. But I went to sceduling agrement , header &item, billing . There billing date is depicted same as PGI and delivery date. The TOP in customer, Bitting tab is 30 days credit. In customer billing Tab page there is no entry that can make this change in PGI and Billing date.
Pls tell me how do I make Billing date and the PGI on the same date?
Thanks
Sangeeta

Hi Sangeeta
Just check in scheduling agreement document type in VOV8 wheather you have maintained Lead time in days or not
Check in VD02->sales area data tab wheather you have assigned the standard factory calendar 01 or not . Because this might be because of the factory calendar also.As it considers weekends has holidays
Check in your shipping point details also wheather you have assigned factory calendar or not
Regards
Srinath

Requested end date must be later than requested start date in Service Request

Hello Experts
I am getting this error in the service request when the date displayed in UI is
Requested start date-06.05.2014
Requested End-08.05.2014
I have searched this error in the SCN, many people have posted this error . I have not got any satisfactory answer in the posts. I am attaching screenshot in the post.
I am configuring the service request.Please reply as its urgent
Thanks all of experts in advance

Hello Ashik
I am facing a new problem please help
I am currently working on service request.I am facing a problem in the date management there.In my service request i have 5 statuses .One of my status is "Pending with consumer".I am using duration settings of service request.By duration settings , i am calculating the duration for which its pending with consumer.I am having 2 response profile one is 24*7 and other is having 9 working hours.In the service request from the SLA configuration i am calculating the escalation date & Time .I need to add the pending with consumer duration with the escalation date and time.I am facing a problem , i am explaining whole problem ..
Let say if the pending with consumer duration is 1440 minutes(that is 24 hours) .I am adding the minutes to the escalation date through the date rule.
I am facing problem that if the service profile is 24*7 then there is no problem but if it is having the 9 hours working service profile then after adding the minutes to it the escalation date is changing to 4 days ahead which is wrong.
I need to add only those minutes for which it is pending with consumer in working hours for the 9 hours service profile
I need to dynamically determine the working hours from the duration then add it to escalation dates when the status is changed from pending with consumer.
Please suggest a badi will work or how to do it.Its urgent as i need to give demo.I will appreciate a quick reply.Please reply

Another question? Is 2G iPhone data plan lower than 3G iPhone data plan?

If I take a 2G iPhone into AT&T and get it set up, is the data plan rate for 200 text messages and internet lower than the 3G iPhone data plan rate. I know the 3G in $30 + $5 (200 text messages) = $35. What would it be for the 2G?
Thanks...
(I want to give my wife my 2G to replace her flip phone and get me a new 3G)

The First Generation iPhone is $20 for Unlimited Data and includes 200 SMS text messages, You can add more to the plan but it will be an additional cost. For $40 total you get Unlimited Text and Data usage.

When situation causes Firefox cache file to have Windows modified date more recent than the access date?

I'm reviewing a report from a forensic examination of a hard drive from a Windows machine. In that report are Firefox 3.x cache files where the Windows modified date is more recent than both the Windows created date and the Windows accessed date, with the latter two dates the same. For instance, the modified date might be March 23, 2011 at 10:30 am, and the created and accessed dates might be March 17 at 9:50 pm. What actions, by Firefox, a user, or some other program (other than a date-modification tool) would cause this state of affairs? I'm generally familiar with these dates and under what conditions they change, but have found no doc explaining this particular situation...

In your example,
*the site was originally visited on March 17 at 9:50 pm and the cache entry was created; at that time all three dates should be the same
*the user visited the site again and the information in that cache file was modified on that second visit, March 23, 2011 at 10:30 am
*my experience makes me agree with the first answer in the first link below that accessed timestamp on Windows system is not always accurate; '''''AND''''' accessed timestamp differs for files and folders as defined in the third link below
*See:
**http://superuser.com/questions/232143/windows-7-file-properties-is-date-accessed-always-100-accurate
**http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms724290%28v=vs.85%29.aspx
**http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa365739%28v=vs.85%29.aspx

Production finish date is later than order finish date?

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for