Production order default settlement type

Hi,
After creating a production order, manually we are maintaining settlement rule by entering catogory and settlement receiver and
after pressing enter automatically the settlement type proposed is PER, but we want system to propose FUL,
pl suggest.
Regards,
Santhosh

HI Santosh
Please check you own thread for the same issue.
Re: Production order default settlement type
either close the previous one and then raise second issue.
Regards
Anupam Sharma

Similar Messages

  • Variance calculation for production order with settlement receiver as SDI

    Hi...
    I have one query reference to Variance calculation for production order with settlement receiver as SDI(Sales document item).
    I am working on Varaint configuration with strategy 25(Make-to-order for configurable material) with requirement class 046.
    I have created sales order ref. to configurable material,subsequently created planned order & then converted to production order.
    In production order settlement receiver is SDI(Sales document item).
    While doing production confirmation ,variance has been created.
    Now during variance calculation KKS2, I have got error message as no suitable settlement rule found for object Order no.
    Is there any way to come out of this?Or variance calculation KKS2 is not applicable with settlement receiver as SDI(Sales document item).
    Pl. guide
    Redards
    Tushar

    Hi
    In case of non valuated material, concept of variance does not apply...
    Variance is Actual Cost - Cost of Goods receipt posted in stock.. If the later value is zero, your entire actual cost is variance... That is one way of saying it
    But, in SAP, var not calculated in case of non valuated material and that makes sense as well.. Since you are in MTO scenario, it would make sense to analyse costs vs revenues @ sale order level as each SO will be unique in itself
    Regards
    Ajay M

  • Settlement rule auto created in Production Order with Receiver Type as OIT

    Hi,
    I am creating a production order with material number in CO01. The system is automatically putting OIT in receiver category, in settlement rule.
    And its populating the child materials there. I expect the parent material to be populated in the settlement receiver.
    In the settlement profile maintained in order type, I have maitained MAT.
    Please let me know, why system is autopopulating the role like above.
    Regards
    SR

    Hi,
    If you are going to settle the production order to Material, there is no need to enter Allocation structure in Settlement profile unless its used for variance settlement...
    Allocation structure has an option to settle to OIT with a settlement cost element or primary cost element...which is why i wanted you to check for that.
    Anyways, Follow the thread, this should help you
    Change the Settlement Rule
    Thx
    PG

  • To see the cost of production order  after settlement to header material

    hello guys,
       In make to stock,we settle the total cost of prodution order on header material,right(if we keep as the default rule( distribution rule in order type)?
         If i want to see that cost of production order which we settled against the header material,where should i check it?should i check in material account or somewhere else?
             Thanking you guys in advance.

    Dear,
    There is a little missunderstanding in your thought.
    If the material of price control S, When you do the GR, the STD cost of material is deducted from production order cost, then when you settle the production order, the variance is settled to variance account/PD account. hence the production order cost balance is zero.
    Example- Production order cost is 60000
    After GR the production order cost balance is 60000-50000 = 10000.
    After settlement production order cost balance is zero.
    Now your question is where can i see the production order cost?
    You can see the production order cost in the production order itself.
    In the production order...cost disply option just filter the origin with test settlement and GR.
    Then total up the cost, then you can see the cost as 60000.
    please come back if you need more help.

  • Variance in Production Order after settlement

    Hi All,
    We have few production orders in whihc has been settled, but now after settlement also there is a balance left in those production order.
    The Status of these production orders is DLV. I have reversed its previous settlement now again tried to settled the Order. Aftter settlement it is taking the entry for WIP account and it is not effecting our Prod Var account.
    Please help how to settle the order and any clue why system is still showing the balance.
    Thanks!!!
    Regards,
    Vivek Srivastava

    Hi Vivek
    I think you are in Prod Cost By Period scenario i.e. Settlement Type in your Settlement rule is PER and not FUL
    In the case of Product Cost By Period - Variance calculation is not dependant on Order Status
    Since you are saying you have DLV status and yet going to WIP - This means you are in PER scenario
    Your order will show the balance till the time you settle for all the periods in which the values have been posted to the prod Order
    Press (CTRLSHIFTF11) to see the values posted in each period.. I think values have been posted in the next periods also and you have not executed settlement for those periods
    Br, Ajay M
    Edited by: Ajay Maheshwari on Feb 27, 2011 2:01 PM

  • Production order not settle correctly

    Hello Guru,
    PO70 in the closing steps showing the balance of production jobs that settled in the current month.  Normally the account holds hundreds of records for thousands of dollars.  February close had approximately 10 records for $.05. 
    1. How Can I  check to make sure the settlement is working properly into account 5049000 which is Production Variance Clearing Account?
    2. We had 5000 production orders settled in September, 2013 and only  1500 settle in February, 2014. What could have caused this? How can I reslove and go about this issue?
    Thank you.

    Hi Adelkunle
    While running variance cycle or settling the production orders, are you getting any error messages. Check the logs.
    Also from business point of view and also based on status of the active production orders, it is quite possible to have low number of production orders settling to variances, in the current period. I do not see any technical issues in this, unless I have no complete understanding of your issue, in which case, I wish if you can please elaborate more on the issue, on technical side.
    Regards
    Mustafa

  • Stopping of GI to higher production order until settlement is done

    Hi
    Can the status of production order be changed after doing settlement?
    My requirement is : GR is done against a production order. Since it is a pegged requirement, this qty will get consumed to higher/superior production order. I want to stop this GI until the settlement for the production order is completed. So if the status of order can be changed after settlement I will write an ABAP program/do some enhancement.
    Ot if there is other way to address this issue, pls explain.
    Thanks & regds

    Hi,
    There is no status for production order settlement is done only the balance of order get zero.
    In order maintaince screen follow the menu path - Goto> Costs> balance.
    Or you can chek in order cost sheet itself, the actual cost sum is zero or not if ZERO than means settled.
    collectively you can see in KKBC_HOE report
    Hope clear to you.
    Regards,
    R.Brahmankar

  • Production Order Variance settling to GL Account

    Hi SAP Gurus,
    when we settle the Production Order Varainces, system posts them to FI - Price Difference Account and also settle to COPA.
    I could not find the settings that will prompt the variances to flow to FI-Price difference account
    Could any one tell me where is the setting for this??
    Points will be awarded suitably
    Best Regards
    Surya

    Hi,
    First of all you would have maintained the Cost Element for the same GL as Cost Element Category 1.
    Now you can go to OBYC - Automatic Account Assignment.
    In PRD Key - General Modification will PRA and this GL will be assigned to PRA key.
    So Whenever price diff will occur, such GL will be reflected.
    The main notable Point:
    Now go to GBB Key. U will find the GL for variance against AUA Key. So whenever variance calculation will be done, such GL will be reflected.
    This is all about the Fetching of GL Account as variance
    Now we are coming to COPA Side
    As we have created Cost Element for the same GL. Now we will assign this cost element in COPA Transfer Structure
    T Code is KEI1. Now you will find the Transfer Structure. Now select the relevant and see the source fields and Value fields asssigned to Cost Element. So COPA will take the effect of Variance from here.
    I hope you understood the flow.
    Hope to be rewarded
    Regards,
    Jigar

  • Production order Variance Settlement

    Hi,
    Can anybody tell, what configuration settings will have to be made to settle variances in production order
    to sales order in COPA?
    Regards
    Milind Nair

    1. TA : OKOA.
    2. CHOOSE  : SETTLEMENT PROFILE
    3. SELECT SETTLEMENT PROFILE,   "PP01" FOR EXAMPLE.
    4. SET ON : VARIANCES TO COSTING BASED PA.
    5. SELECT PA TRANSFER STRUCTURE (BEFORE THAT YOU MUST HAVE CREATED PA TRANSFER STRUCTURE)
    YOU CAN CREATE PA TRASFER STREUCTURE BY  TA : OKOA
    A . CHOOSE:  PA TRANSFER STRUCTURE .
    B. CREATE PA TRANSFER STRUCTURE. FOR EXAMPLE :
        A1-  Settle production variances
    C. ENTER ASSIGNMENT  LINES:  FOR EXAMPLE :
    10     Input price variance
    20     Input quantity variance
    30     Resource-usage variance
    40     Remaining input variance
    D.  FOR EACH LINE ASSIGN  SOCURCE  (COST ELEMENT  + VARIANCE CATEGORY , f.example.)  AND VALUED FILEDS.

  • Production order variance settlement( Ko88)

    Hi All
    I belive, this will be the account entery when we do production order settlement
    Dr :PRD a/c (production variance account)
    Cr:  GBB-AUA or AUF( Inventory a/c in)
    We are not implementing material ledger.
    My question is
    what is the best practice "whether to use AUA or AUF" If we are not using materail ledger?
    For me it makes sense to use AUF .
    Please advise me
    Thanks in advance

    You don't have a choice.

  • Production Order Variance Settlement to COPA

    Hi gurus,
    Do i have to create the cost element for the settlement of production orders to COPA ?
    When i have a negative variance i can settle correct with the cost element created.
    When i have a positive variance i can not settle with the cost element created. The system ask to update the PA transfer structure with the cost element.
    What do i need to do, create or not the cost element ?
    Regards

    Hi,
    Did you run KKS1/KKS2 before settlement? If you have only execute the settlement, variances will usually not calculated automatically.
    regards,
    Ronny

  • Production order variance settlement to cost centers/internal order

    Hi,
    I am looking to configure the settlement of production order variances to cost centers/internal order. Is there a way to do this in the settlement profile. Would appreciate your help.
    Thank you,
    Ram

    OKO7 will allow you to configure the Settlement Profile by selecting valid receivers.
    This should be done with/or by FICO.
    Then test, test, test
    award points if helpful
    Althea

  • CO Substituion for Production order variance settlement

    Hi,
    In make to order production, Our client requirement was not to settle variances to sales order but directly to COPA.
    We cannot use variance categories in settlement profile/PA transfer structure as we have transfer pricing setup and direct settlement of variances categories to COPA updates only legal view of COPA and not profit center view of COPA.
    Therefore variance GL account was created as cost element in our case.
    Now that client wants to settle variances to sales order for certain plants and directly to COPA in certain plants.
    Therefore i tried with a CO substitution to clear sales order assignment for the variance GL and then in OKB9 i have set up PSG as default account assignment.
    Now when i run the settlement, in debug mode i am able to see that the substitution works and clears the sales order assignment, but when i see the FI document posted, it still has SO assignment. No COPA document is triggered and a controlling document on sales order is posted.
    Why does substitution not work for variance settlement in case of MTO process.
    Regards
    Raghu

    Hi Ajay,
    I used user exit OKC9 as suggested in SAP note 183250 (last paragraph) and SAP note 105024.
    With the user exit, we have cleared the Sales order information and also called OKB9 as per the note 105024.
    Now the settlement document is generated without Sales order assignment. A PSG is generated but no cost based COPA document. We also use account based copa. In controlling document, i can see PSG is updated as cost object against the variance GL.
    Why does not Cost based COPA automatically generated.
    We have FI settlement profile properly maintained. With a manual posting to this GL, i can see cost based copa document.
    Accounting document before changes to user exit has following object
    Dt 40600 Change in Stock, Prd Order
    Ct 44760 Production Variance, Sales Order
    Accounting document after changes to user exit has following objects
    Dt 40600 Change in Stock, Prd Order
    Ct 44760 Production Variance, Material & PSG
    In the user exit, i have cleared the material from COBL, still it appears in the posting
    Regards
    Raghu
    Edited by: Raghu Ram Thatavarthy on Nov 25, 2011 1:19 PM

  • Production order: Automatic Generation of settlement rule .......

    Hi Gurus,
    I am trying to settle a production order to a cost center. I have already define a settlement profile with Cost center as the default reciever and assigned it to the Order type but when I tried to settle it, I have to create a distirbution rule manually every time. Is this some thing to do with the strategy sequence? I have done a lot of research but the system doesnt give me any option for autmatically generating a settlement rule or assigning strategy sequence to order type for production order. I found some thing for Internal orders, but still i cant do it. Would any of you please help me. I would appreciate if you put the steps with the trxn codes.
    Thanks

    Dear.
    As I know, there're no way to generate settlement rule of production order automatically such as that of WBS(network).
    In settlement profile, If you want automatic fuction, you can only set PA segment as receiver addionally.
    What you want to do is the price difference(PRD-PRF) of production order be settled? then, why don't you make automatic account assignment(OKB9)?
    Generally, assumed using PA segment as receiver, we don't make price difference account as cost element, But, In your case, If you want to settle all amount of that to fixed cost center, specify that cost element to cost center by OKB9 instead of adding cost center in settleme rule.
    Regards.

  • Doubt about the settlement rule of the Production ORder

    The only default distribution rule allowed for a PP order is PP1 or PP2.  We would need to change that to allow settlement to multiple receivers as a default. If that is the case, we may want to look into a user exit to update the settlement rule during production order creation instead so that the G/L account is correct from the beginning.
    Currently when we create the production order, the settlement rule will default the below, I am not sure if a user exit is able to maintain the Source as 200 (Materials)?
    If yes, we can then add the second rule for Source 100 (Labor and Mfg) via the user exit as well.
    In this case, SAP will not prompt us error of settlement with 200%, as they are from difference Sources.
    now anybody can explain me about the User EXit we have to correct this

    any help on this.. please its very urgent
    thanks in advance

Maybe you are looking for