Production order settlement to statistical internal order

If you would like to settle a production order to a statistical internal order, could you at the same time settle to COPA ?

Hi,
principally its possible to add a real settlement receiver and a statistical settlement receiver. If you have entered the real acount assignment (CO-PA = PSG) in the settlement rule mark the line, tick the "detail" button (F2) and enter the statistical account assignment.
The settlement receivers (PSG and ORD) must be allowed in the settlement profile and in the allocation structure there must be a settlement cost element assigned to receiver type "PSG and ORD" (or it is settled cost element wise).
Please try!
Best regards, Christian

Similar Messages

Internal order settle to another internal order

dear all,
for internal order group have 2 order,and i want to settle by hierachy:
A order settle to B order,then B order settle to GL account, how to config the settlement rule for
this 2 orders?
this purpose is to simulate PS WBS/activity if internal order can be collect cost then settle to a final GL acct..

maybe i have make more detail for my question:
a order group contain internal order A/B,and order B under A like follow structure:
order group
- order A
-- order B
order A have plan/actual revenue/cost
order B only have plan cost
the settlement is try to settle order group: as my RA key is set as POC way to calculate revenue/cost,
the formula of POC = actual cost / plan cost * plan revenue
so i want the settle result of this group = actual cost of A / plan cost of A+B * plan revenue of A
now the settle result = actual cost of A / plan cost of A * plan revenue of A,not include plan cost of B
how to make it possible?

Sales order settlement Problem with Internal Order

HI Dear Friends,
How are you, I am fine.
We have 1 Process here Related with SD & FI/CO
for 1 process we have treat as a small Project,
the process is we have make 1st Contract and create Internal order and assign Internal order to Contract
then Create Sales Release Order and assing Internal Order in Settlement Rule in Sales order.
then we create billing ref to Contract and then we did PGI.
1) at billing time the Internal Order is Updatting
2) at PGI time internal Order is not updating - what is the right process - the internal; Order will be updating or not
then we have to do Sales order Settlement thtough Trasaction code VA88
what will happned at this level pleas be advicsed becos when i do this it is giving messges not is toi be settled.
Friends I did all exercise complete except Settlement trough T-Code VA88.
When I am going to do this settlement VA88 it is giving messages there is nothing to be settle.
What I have to do please be advised.
I did all these activities:
1)     Create sales Contract
2)     Create Internal Order
3)     Assign Internal Order to sales Contract
4)     Crate Release Sales Order
5)     Assign Internal Order to Release Sales Order
6)     Delivery & PGI
7)     Billing         (at billing time the internal Order should be Updates (pls advise it should be or not)
8)     Last is Settlement VA88 u2013 this time it is giving Error.
When I settle the Sales order to internal order what will happens. Which value will update.
Please reply me frds,
Thanks,
Srem.

hello Lakshmipathi,
Thanks a lot for your reply.
I tried to change the requierement class in order to put one with special stock E as you explained, but i still have my weird schedule line. When i put the item in the order it is 0 stock for today, but stock find in 12 days either if there is stock or no(unrestricted stock i mean).
If i change the RDD in more than 12 days the stock is available for the date requested.
If you have an idea of what could be wrong because on my case i want the schedule line to be at 0 while the sales order reservation has not been processed (via MB1B/412/E) and once the stock movement is done the schedule line has to be find.
I dont know if im clear enought..
To be more clear, i want the schedule line based on the "sales order stock" and not on the "unrestricted stock".
thanks for your help!
Guillaume

Statistical Internal Orders - How can i charge to multiple cost centers

In the master data for the statistical internal orders, I am only able to enter one cost center in the 'Actual Posted Cctr' field. Is there a way to have multiple cost centers and the allocation % for each cost center (similar to the settlement rules on regular internal orders)?
thanks!

Hiya,
OKB9 works by assigning multiple Cost Centres to the Company Code + GL combination. However, I don't believe OKB9 is your solution - for the simple reason that you wish to post the information to multiple CCtrs, along with posting it to this Statistical IO.
In my opinion, you may have to delete the Actual Cost Centre assignment and, at the time of document posting, assign the True CCtr as well as this IO, or look for a User Exit that will trigger flows to multiple CCtrs along with this IO.
The other option is to make this a real posting to this IO (change the IO from statistical to real), and then settle this cost to multiple CCtrs. As long as it stays statistical, you don't have the liberty of settling the cost.
Hope this helps.
Cheers.

Plan data on Statistical Internal Order

Dear gurus,
Presently we have real internal orders for the projects but now we are diverting from real Internal Order to Statistical Internal Order. Before we use to plan data on the real internal order. My concern is by changing the IO to statistical, would it impact on the Plan data? How can we approach the Planning data in the statistical Internal Order?
Also while creating Statistical Internal Order, the system does not allows to select Plan-Integrated Order field. What is the signficance and by not selecting this field, this does impact the plan data on the statistical IO
Thank you in advance
Regards

Diverting to Statistical order,system will not allow you make settlement. if you need only for information purpose, then u can adopt the statiscal order.
System will not allow to select statistical indicator & Indicator for Integrated Planning. you will only select one option. u can only select with real indicator
by selecting the "Indicator for Integrated Planning"activity inputs planned are updated
directly on the sending cost center if 'Integrated planning with Cost Center Accounting' is activated in the version. You can then also settle plan-integrated orders/projects to cost centers.which only possible with Real order
I hope this will be helpful

Change cost center in statistic internal order

Hello all,
I have got a problem with the master data of our internal orders. We´ve defined them as statistic objects, and the information of the cost center is an obligatory input within the master data of each internal order. After the first entry has been done the cost center can not be changed anymore. Now we have the necessity to change the cost center in all our internal orders once. Could you help me to find a solution how the cost center remains a changeable input in the master data of a statistic internal order? Or how I may change the cost center just once?
Thanks for your help.
Best regards,
Bettina

Dear Sir,
The field is greyed off if the following is applicable:
-> the order has planned or posted entries
-> you have created a settlement rule on it.
If you want to have the field to be changable, please apply the modification note 198036
regards
Waman

Regarding statistical internal order

hi guys i have following issue with internal order....
Statistical Internal Order - Used to track R&D dollars spent for different projects. The internal orders will not be settled - just for reporting purpose.
can n y one explain what is this all about.? can n y one help me solving it?
Thanks in advance

Hi Paru,
A statistical order means whatever posting goes to this order is only for information purpose. When you assign a stat. order in the document line item you will also have to assign the real cost object to carry cost to controlling. You can not distribute or settle these cost from the stat. order to another cost object because of the statistical status. If you require that cost after posting to order should be able to reposted to other cost object you have to creat the real cost order.
If you find this helpful please reward some points.
Js

Settle AUC without internal order

Is it possible to settle AUC without Internal Order???

Hello,
Yes, it is possible. You can settle AUC in two ways
1. through internal order (KO88)
2. Through distribution and settlement (AIAB and AIBU)
The major difference between the two is that in case of Internal Order you can establish budgets in the Internal Order which is Control the costs. But in case of direct posting to the AUC, you would not be able to control the cost.
In the Internal Order scenario all the cost is first pooled to the Order and then settled to the Asset at regular intervals. Where as in case of the second method all the expenses are posted directly to the AUC and then it is being Distributed and settled to various Assets as required
1. Asset settlement thought internal order is general used for assets under construction. All costs are pooled in the internal order. Periodically or whenever wants the internal order is settled (within a fiscal year) i.e. the amounts in the internal order are capitalized.
First create an internal order (KO01), take object class as investment and give investment profile. Now system asks and creates one AUC account under asset class 4001.
Then create settlement rule (KO02) and release the order (control data tab) Post some amounts (like wages or non-production material) to internal order. Then come to KO88, first take the automatic settlement and run.
The accounting entry passed is
Asset under construction a/c Dr
To Wages a/c
If you want to complete the settlement to auc, then take now full settlement option and run then accounting entry passed is
Asset a/c Dr
To Asset under construction a/c
While doing settlement in KO88, you can give any settlement period, posting period and asset date, but all should be in the same fiscal year. If you want to close the order go to KO02, give order number and take control data tab and click on technical complete tab on the screen and save. Internal order will be closed.
2. If your AUC is under Asset class 4000
this auc account is created directly because of direct postings to AUC account. Posting are made through F-90 For example
AUC a/c dr
To vendor or bank account
Go to AIAB ---> Give distribution rule and go to AIBU --> Settle the asset
Entry passed is
Asset a/c Dr
To AUC a/c
Thanks
Para

Settlement Rule for Internal Order

Hi All
I have Maintained Settlement rule for Internal order as under
CAT - FXA
Settlement Receiver - Asset
% - 100
Settlement type - Full
Now after settlement of above Order in KO88 . I want again use above internal order. Hence i have trying to put Settlement rule 50% for some anther asset but system gave me following error. Please guide on this issue.
Total = 50.00%, ( Set.Type PER / Version / Actual settlement ), period 010/2011
Message no. KD042
Diagnosis
You have entered distribution rules which settle 50.00% in total. This applies for settlement view ( Set.Type PER / Version / Actual settlement ) in period 010/2011.
When checking the percentage total, the system found one of the following errors:
The total percentage for the distribution rules is more than 100%
The total percentage for the distribution rules is less than 100% and this is a rule for full settlement.
The total percentage for the distribution rules is less than 100% and the 100% check is switched on in the settlement profile.

Hi:
        Please refer to the contents of OSS Note 45612 - IM: pre-settlement does not work, or KD042... which states
"Symptom
    1. If a preliminary settlement rule (for example, to cost center) is entered for individual items of capital investment measures with line item management, this rule is not considered during periodic settlement. There is no settlement to cost centers.
    2. If you enter a final settlement rule for individual line items of investment measures with line item management for a partial capitalization (that is, the percentage rate is less than 100%), then you receive the unjustified error message KD042 "Total percent = xx%".
Additional key words
KOB5, CJ70, CJ88, CJ8G, KO88, KO8G, preliminary settlement, partial settlement, partial capitalization
Cause and prerequisites
    1. You did not enter the settlement type ACT in the preliminary settlement rule.
    You can check this in the Line Item Apportionment transaction by choosing the menu option "Goto" -> "Overview dist. rules" to display the distribution rule groups entered so far.
    The system displays rules which have no entry in the "SetTyp" field (settlement type, field name PERBZ).
    2. The check of the percentages is incorrect.
Solution
    1. Install the following correction. Afterwards reverse the incorrect settlement, re-enter the preliminary settlement rule and settle again.
    2. Install the following correction. Afterwards, you can maintain the settlement rule for the partial settlement.
    Note: If you want to use a default settlement rule (maintaining the settlement rule from the master data maintenance transaction), then you are required to distribute the line items at 100%. In order to carry out a partial capitalization (settlement of less than 100%), you have to use menu path "Actual postings -> Period-end closing -> Settlement -> Line item "
Regards

Statistical Internal Order on a Purchase Order

Hi,
We are trying to use a statistical internal order on a purchase order along with a real cost center. But we are unable to get the internal order to show up on the FI documents being posted using goods receipt.
Purchase Order has been created with 'F" (order) as the account category. On the account assignment tab we have maitained an expense cost element & real cost center & statistical internal order.
Internal order master data has been created with just the company code and object class as OCOST.
Please let me know what we are doing incorrectly and how can we have the statistical internal order show up on the FI document.
Thanks,
Venkat

Hi Venkat,
Statistical Internal order doesn't work if GL account used is not a cost element. You need to make your GL account as cost element. If the respective GL account doen not need to be cost element then you can make it statistical cost element with category 90. In this case it'll not ask for CO object or it'll not create any error or issues.
Hope it'll work.
Thanks,
- Mahak
Edited by: Mahak Birla Mantri on Jun 15, 2009 11:34 AM

TX CNS41 - settled cost from internal order to WBS element not displayed

Hi PS Expets,
I have a question regarding transaction CNS41 "Structure Overview" where cost settled from an internal order is not displayed in in the report for a selected project. This is in a ECC version 5.0
Settled costs from internal orders are posted with transaction type KOAO on WBS elements and when you check report RCNSTFCO you can see that the following transaction types are deselected when executing transaction CNS41:
delete t_rpsco_m where vorga = 'KOAO' "<   insert
                      or vorga = 'KOAL' "<   insert
                      or vorga = 'KOAP' "<   insert
                      or vorga = 'KOAQ' "<   insert
                      or vorga = 'KOAR'."<   insert
CALL FUNCTION 'HFPM_RPSCO_TO_RPSCO_LIS_CONV'
This is implemented according to OSS note 51971 in order to eliminate internal business volume in the project structure when executing a PS hierarchy report.
But this also eliminate the display of the cost from the internal order.
Any ideas or a work around in order to display settled cost from an internal order on a WBS element in transaction CNS41
Kind regards,
Anne

Hello Tison.
I guess you have the Project created with a BAPI in your system in background. As far as I have seen I'd try the following in ABAP to create Partners in the Project Definition: BAPI_BUS2001_PARTNER_CREATE_M or the corresponding method ProjectDefinitionPI.PartnerCreateMultiple. This should happen in background when the Project is created also.
Best regards.
Jens Schmid

Goods Issuance against Statistical Internal Order

Dear Sir,
We need to monitor the expenses against a particular activity . For this we had opened an Statistical Internal Order . Pl guide us as what steps need to be followed for Issuing of Material (MB1a) , against the Statisical Internal Order reference .
I will be highly obliged for the kind help pl .
Rgds
Sonia Agarwal

Dear Mr Manish
Thanks for reply .
During MB1a , movement 261 after giving Internal Order , System is asking for the Cost Center also . I desire that Cost Center should come automatically from Internal Order . As in KO01 , I have already mentioned the Responsible Cost Center for this Internal Order .
Kindly help us pl .
Rgds
Sonia Agarwal

Asset Postings on Statistical Internal orders

Hi
Is it possible to see asset transactions on a statistical internal order? I have assigned a statistical order on the asset master record but can not see the acquisition and other asset related postings on the order. Of course in all the postings there is a real CO object.
Thanks

Hi Sreenkanth
I have used all the reports in Internal Orders including the one you suggest and what is happening is that all the cost elements that have been posted to are displayed in the report, but the asset statistical cost element shows no values. Even when you click on the amount field and call up another report e.g. actual line items, which is what I think you meant by break up report, there are no values shown.
Thanks
Ceecee

Linking Sales Promotions to Statistical Internal Orders

We have two kinds of promotions here.
a) Consumer Promotion - reduced price for a particular period
b) Trade Promotion - Free goods - buy 10 get one free.
We are creating these promotion through standard SAP route with a validity period, and these get populated in the sales order order correctly.
The promotionional expenses are borne by the supplier (vendor). To debit his account with the appropriate expenses, we have created Statistical Internal orders (SIO) in CO, one per supplier account.
(We have developed a report where we accumulate all the values dueing these two above promotions and manually pass a JV in finance in the SIO.This is a long circuitous process and we are exploring other alternativesto make the values flow directly to the SIO)
If you double click on the sales order item, and proceed to Account Assignment tab, you will see an order no., where you can select the (SIO) no., which we are doing manually.
I am unable to find any place in configuration of Sales Promotion/Sales Deal/ SIO (definition) through which I can default the SIO no. in the sales order, so that the values can flow automatically.
Please help if possible.
Thanks & Regards
AN

I think that this is not possible.
Roberto

Account assignment category for cost centre and statistical internal order

When issuing purchase order, we use account assignment category u2018Fu2019 for (PM) order, and u2018Ku2019 for cost centre. What account assignment category to use, when issuing purchase order, if we want to charge to both cost centre (as mandatory) and statistical internal order (as optional entry field)?
Do you create custom account assignment category for that purposes?
I reviewed Note 305385 but do not think it's relevant to us.

Hi Stacy
you can create a custom acct assgn category (AAC) in OME9... COPY the K to Z and make changes in it
However, I feel the Std AAC K should serve your purpose if you want to have Cost Ctr as mandatory and Order as Optional
Br, Ajay M

Production order settlement to statistical internal order

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for