Products with multiple attributes

When entering products such as socks which have multiple colors and sizes per style, should each item be a unique entry with it's own ID? We have set attributes to allow selection of color and size but I dont know how stock can be managed this way?

Really handy to read the BC Blog:
http://www.businesscatalyst.com/_blog/BC_Blog/post/Announcing_our_October_2012_System_Upda te/

Similar Messages

Product with multiple copyright infringements in iTunes store

Hi, I found a product with multiple copyright infringements in the iTunes store. It's an application that is being sold for the iPad, iPhone, and iPod, that contains ripped content from multiple sources, including one authored by me. More importantly, the seller does not currently own the rights to sell the game that their application is emulating. Strangely enough I haven't found a "Report" area in the iTunes store. Where would I go to report a case like this?

There is a regular report page here: http://www.apple.com/feedback/itunesapp.html but there is also a special section for Content Providers: http://www.apple.com/itunes/content-providers/
Note that Apple functions as a retailer. I have no knowledge of what role they would or would not play in a case like this, but if you feel there is infringement, you may wish to seek legal advice.

Make to stock planning for a finished product with variant attributes

Hello All,
I have one finished product with different characteristics like color and sizes, I have to create demand for the same finished product
and to define different characteristics but should get one planned order for each combination of characteristics. Can anybody suggest how to create demand in make to stock situation.

Hi ,
Try using "Planning with Planning Material' .
1: Define Planning material ( which is never produced) & it's BOM with only common assemblies( Finished product specific assmblies should not be added here)
2: Create Finished products seperately & assign planning material to Finished products. Finished product BOM should contain common assemblies & Variant assemblies
2:Enter Planned independent req for planning material & run MRP , it will generate procurement of it's common componenets
3: SO for Finished product reduces PIR of planning material & triggers Final assembly.
4: Planning with planning material should be 60 strategy . it must be entered in both planning material & Finsihed goods.
This is possible with make -to stock as seperate Finished goods are created for each combinatin of color & sizes.
Hope it helps,
Jatin

Problems with multiple Attribute Dimensions

Hello Guys,
when i try to get data from an Essbase database using the Grid API with more then one Attribute Dimension,
the server needs a very long time to response or doesn't response at all.
I encounter the same behaviour when i perform a query using the Excel Query Designer.
Here is a sample query log output:
<subquery>
<cluster size="1">
<dim size="1"><member>MEASURE</member></dim>
<dim size="1"><member>PERIOD</member></dim>
<dim size="1"><member>YEAR</member></dim>
<dim size="1"><member>CATEGORY</member></dim>
<dim size="1"><member>CURRENCY</member></dim>
<dim size="1"><member>CUSTOMER</member></dim>
<dim size="1"><member>PRODUCT</member></dim>
<dim size="1"><member>Business</member></dim>
<dim size="1"><member>black</member></dim>
<dim size="1"><member>Attribute Calculations</member></dim>
</cluster>
</subquery>
<elapsedtime>94.217 seconds
Any help would be appreciated.
Regards,
Martin Brandl

Thanks for the swift response. Always ideas are useful.
As of now , Middleware cannot split the file.
Thing is SAP is creating two Idocs with different message types. Problem is First IDoc contains ORDERS message type but also DELIVERY segments as well. Second IDoc with DELIVERY message tyoe but ORDERS segments as well... This is the problem... I think we are missing some field activation in file for EDIDC record.
As far as I know file port supports the number of IDocs in one file.. Hope TRFC port also supports that

Is Lightroom supported in a Active Directory domain environment with multiple users logging into a machine?

We are a school district using an Active Directory environment. We currently use other Adobe products with multiple users on different machines and it works fine. If Lightroom does work in a domain environment what are the required local user permissions needed for it tor work properly? Thanks!

Lightroom is not a multiuser program. It is required that the catalog is located on a hard drive that is local to the machine accessing it. There are no workarounds.

Multiple attributes in lov

Hi, forum.
I don't know where do I make a mistake.
I tryed to make lov with multiple attributes how it is described in the
JHeadstart Developer's guide.
But when I type several attribute names, separated by comma
in Lookup Display Attribute property and run JAG I receive the following error:
Attribute ..., ... does not exist in VO.
Help, please!!!

Check your Jhs version. This feature (multiple LOV attributes) is only available in 10.1.2.1 version.
Eduardo

New to Apple products (finally) - can I use my Itunes account with multiple products e.g. Iphone and Ipad?

New to Apple products (finally) - can I use my Itunes account with multiple products e.g. Iphone and Ipad?

Oh yes! Apple will be happy for you to buy as many Apple products as you can afford.
As and when needed, each can be given its own selections of content to sync with.
tt2

Can i create additional apple id's using the same email address for using multiple products with iCloud?

can i create additional apple id's using the same email address for using multiple products with iCloud?

Hi Anne,
I'm pretty sure different eMail addies are needed for different Apple IDs.

Creation of Service Product with Set Type and Attribute

Dear All,
Please guide me with proper step by step process,
How to create the product with the set type and attribute for service industry in sap crm 7.0
Regards,

Hi Nitin,
Before creating the Service type of product, you have to define the Base category for Service type product. Generally the category for service will be created under the R3 hierarchy R3PRODSTYPE. You can create this category using the TCode:
COMM_HIERARCHY. Here you have to select the product type as Service and have to assign the set types to the category.
You can create a service product using the transaction : COMMPR01 -> Click on Service ICON -> Select the Category for Service Type. Then fill in the details for Service Product description, Service ID(Based on number range settings for products), Language.
Also fill other details like Base Unit of measure, Pricing condition for different sales areas for the service product.
Since you are using CRM7.0, you can do all these activities using a POWER USER role.
For more information about Set types and hierarchies please refer the following help link:
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_crm70/helpdata/EN/46/57672501a208e7e10000000a114a6b/frameset.htm
Hope this helps!
Regards,
Chethan

Report for Cost of Multiple products with Multilevel BOM explosion

Hi,
Our client has a requirement of a report showing standard cost estimate of multiple FG products, with multi-level BOM explosion.
In short, the requirement is to get a CK13N report for multiple products.
Has anyone come across such requirement? The requirements seems to be very normal.
But, I have not seen any standard report for the same. If there is any, please suggest.
or suggest a better solution for the same.
Thanks in advance. Pts guaranteed.

Hi,
I totally agree with you that this is a totally vague requirement.
However, let me share the reason for such client requirement.
We have a customer, for which we produce certain parts for select models. Now, the arrangement with customer for pricing is based on the raw material and other production cost for all such parts. Based on the fluctuations in cost, the pricing would be finalised.. on a monthly or quarterly basis.
For this purpose, the customer requires to know the raw materials used in each of the part.
Individually it could have been managed. But the price change in terms of % is decided at global level and not for each part.
Please suggest

Multiple ios products with the same name.

Hello guys,
We have multiple iOS universal products with the same name for different countries. Will it cause any issues when the user installs them in the same device? Using Xcode to push them to my device, i noticed that they are all installed in the same place, i.e only one app is available. So my question is how should we do to use the same name for multiple apps and is it possible?

Go ahead and doubt if it makes you feel superior.
For others:
If your pom has this:
<dependency>
               <groupId>javax.faces</groupId>
               <artifactId>jsf-api</artifactId>
               <version>${jsf.version}</version>
          </dependency>
          <dependency>
               <groupId>javax.faces</groupId>
               <artifactId>jsf-impl</artifactId>
               <version>${jsf.version}</version>
          </dependency>
where jsf.version = 1.2, change jsf.version to 1.2_10

Problem using multiple choice LOV with custom attribute in IAS 10.1.2.0.2

Hi
When aplying a multiple choice and selecting multiple selection and saving in the content area , everything looks fine .
However when looking at the page the selection is only the first one selected and not the miltiple choices I made
can someone tell me what is going on , does the miltiple selection with custom attribute
works ??
thanks in advance
Igal

Hi there,
I don't really understand what you're doing but I used lot of LOV in custom attributes on my custom items and everything works fine.
Can you explain more your problem ?

Topic: Incorrect Tag:Multiple Attributes with Same Collection Type

I have an Object Type that contains multiple attributes with the same collection type. When I use OracleXML getXML to generate xml, the tag for all elements created for any of the matching types is the tag for the 1st of the similar attributes.
work_t_v is an object view of a relational schema
SQL> desc work_t_v
Name Null? Type
WORK_ID NUMBER(38)
TITLE_OF_WORK VARCHAR2(512)
MESH_HEADINGS MESH_HEADINGS_T
AUTHORS AUTHORS_T
COMMENT_ON WORK_REFERENCES_T
COMMENT_IN WORK_REFERENCES_T
ERRATUM_IN WORK_REFERENCES_T
REPUBLISHED_FROM WORK_REFERENCES_T
REPUBLISHED_IN WORK_REFERENCES_T
SQL> desc work_references_t
work_references_t TABLE OF WORK_REFERENCE_T
Name Null? Type
REFSOURCE VARCHAR2(255)
NOTE VARCHAR2(255)select
work.work_id,
work.title_of_work,
work.comment_on comment_on,
work.comment_in comment_in,
work.erratum_in erratum_in,
work.republished_from republished_from,
work.republished_in republished_in
from work_t_v work
where work_id = 99350984
results in tag of <comment_on> for all the elements built from the work_references_t type (i.e., there are no <comment_in>, <erratum_in>, <republished_from> or <republished_in> elements)
sample result is:
<COMMENT_ON>
<COMMENT_ON_ITEM>
<REFSOURCE>J Infect Dis 1998 Aug;178(2):601 [CommentOn]</REFSOURCE>
</COMMENT_ON_ITEM>
</COMMENT_ON>
<COMMENT_ON>
<COMMENT_ON_ITEM>
<REFSOURCE>J Infect Dis 1998 Aug;178(2):601 [CommentIn]</REFSOURCE>
</COMMENT_ON_ITEM>
</COMMENT_ON>
<COMMENT_ON>
<COMMENT_ON_ITEM>
<REFSOURCE>J Infect Dis 1998 Aug;178(2):601 [ErratumIn]</REFSOURCE>
</COMMENT_ON_ITEM>
</COMMENT_ON>
<COMMENT_ON>
<COMMENT_ON_ITEM>
<REFSOURCE>J Infect Dis 1998 Aug;178(2):601 [RepublishedFrom]</REFSOURCE>
</COMMENT_ON_ITEM>
</COMMENT_ON>
<COMMENT_ON>
<COMMENT_ON_ITEM>
<REFSOURCE>J Infect Dis 1998 Aug;178(2):601 [RepublishedIn]</REFSOURCE>
</COMMENT_ON_ITEM>
</COMMENT_ON>
The above xml should be:
<COMMENT_ON>
<COMMENT_ON_ITEM>
<REFSOURCE>J Infect Dis 1998 Aug;178(2):601 [CommentOn]</REFSOURCE>
</COMMENT_ON_ITEM>
</COMMENT_ON>
<COMMENT_IN>
<COMMENT_IN_ITEM>
<REFSOURCE>J Infect Dis 1998 Aug;178(2):601 [CommentIn]</REFSOURCE>
</COMMENT_IN_ITEM>
</ERRATUM_IN>
<COMMENT_ON>
<ERRATUM_IN_ITEM>
<REFSOURCE>J Infect Dis 1998 Aug;178(2):601 [ErratumIn]</REFSOURCE>
</ERRATUM_IN_ITEM>
</ERRATUM_IN>
<REPUBLISHED_FROM>
<REPUBLISHED_FROM_ITEM>
<REFSOURCE>J Infect Dis 1998 Aug;178(2):601 [RepublishedFrom]</REFSOURCE>
</REPUBLISHED_FROM_ITEM>
</REPUBLISHED_FROM>
<REPUBLISHED_IN>
<REPUBLISHED_IN_ITEM>
<REFSOURCE>J Infect Dis 1998 Aug;178(2):601 [RepublishedIn]</REFSOURCE>
</REPUBLISHED_IN_ITEM>
</REPUBLISHED_IN>bracketed portion [] is contained within the refsource string to indicate what type of reference it should be displayed as.
I also found that if I use the -withDTD parameter to include the dtd, the dtd includes the appropriate elements (comment_in, erratum_in, republished_from and republished_in). However, it incorrectly defines refsource and note multiple times (once for each WORK_REFERENCES_T attribute).
Are these known problems? Will they be fixed? I'm more concerned about the XML problem than the DTD problem.
Thanks! -- John Butler
null

Using the version of XML SQL Utility that comes with the next XSQL Servlet release 0.9.8.6 I did the following:
create type foo as object (a number);
create type foolist as table of foo;
create view fooview
as select
cast(multiset(
select sal from emp where rownum < 2)
as foolist) list1,
cast(multiset(
select sal from emp where rownum < 2)
as foolist) list2
from dual;
When I request a "SELECT * FROM FOOVIEW"
through getXML I get:
<?xml version="1.0"?>
<ROWSET>
<ROW num="1">
<LIST1>
<LIST1_ITEM>
<A>800</A>
</LIST1_ITEM>
</LIST1>
<LIST2>
<LIST2_ITEM>
<A>800</A>
</LIST2_ITEM>
</LIST2>
</ROW>
</ROWSET>
So this appears fixed in the next code drop.
In the interim, I'll email you the new JAR file until (since it won't be on OTN for a few more days).
null

Incorrect Tag:Multiple Attributes with Same Collection Type

I have an Object Type that contains multiple attributes with the
same collection type. When I use OracleXML getXML to generate
xml, the tag for all elements created for any of the matching
types is the tag for the 1st of the similar attributes.
work_t_v is an object view of a relational schema
SQL> desc work_t_v
Name Null? Type
WORK_ID NUMBER(38)
TITLE_OF_WORK VARCHAR2(512)
MESH_HEADINGS MESH_HEADINGS_T
AUTHORS AUTHORS_T
COMMENT_ON WORK_REFERENCES_T
COMMENT_IN WORK_REFERENCES_T
ERRATUM_IN WORK_REFERENCES_T
REPUBLISHED_FROM WORK_REFERENCES_T
REPUBLISHED_IN WORK_REFERENCES_T
SQL> desc work_references_t
work_references_t TABLE OF WORK_REFERENCE_T
Name Null? Type
REFSOURCE VARCHAR2(255)
NOTE VARCHAR2(255)
select
work.work_id,
work.title_of_work,
work.comment_on comment_on,
work.comment_in comment_in,
work.erratum_in erratum_in,
work.republished_from republished_from,
work.republished_in republished_in
from work_t_v work
where work_id = 99350984
results in tag of <comment_on> for all the elements built from
the work_references_t type (i.e., there are no <comment_in>,
<erratum_in>, <republished_from> or <republished_in> elements)
<COMMENT_ON>
<COMMENT_ON_ITEM>
<REFSOURCE>J Infect Dis 1998 Aug;178(2):601
[CommentOn]</REFSOURCE>
</COMMENT_ON_ITEM>
</COMMENT_ON>
<COMMENT_ON>
<COMMENT_ON_ITEM>
<REFSOURCE>J Infect Dis 1998 Aug;178(2):601
[CommentIn]</REFSOURCE>
</COMMENT_ON_ITEM>
</COMMENT_ON>
<COMMENT_ON>
<COMMENT_ON_ITEM>
<REFSOURCE>J Infect Dis 1998 Aug;178(2):601
[ErratumIn]</REFSOURCE>
</COMMENT_ON_ITEM>
</COMMENT_ON>
<COMMENT_ON>
<COMMENT_ON_ITEM>
<REFSOURCE>J Infect Dis 1998 Aug;178(2):601
[RepublishedFrom]</REFSOURCE>
</COMMENT_ON_ITEM>
</COMMENT_ON>
<COMMENT_ON>
<COMMENT_ON_ITEM>
<REFSOURCE>J Infect Dis 1998 Aug;178(2):601
[RepublishedIn]</REFSOURCE>
</COMMENT_ON_ITEM>
</COMMENT_ON>
bracketed portion [] is contained within the refsource string to
indicate what type of reference it should be displayed as.
I also found that if I use the -withDTD parameter to include the
dtd, the dtd includes the appropriate elements (comment_in,
erratum_in, republished_from and republished_in). However, it
incorrectly defines refsource and note multiple times (once for
each WORK_REFERENCES_T attribute).
Are these known problems? Will they be fixed? I'm more
concerned about the XML problem than the DTD problem.
Thanks! -- John Butler
null

Using the version of XML SQL Utility that comes with the next XSQL Servlet release 0.9.8.6 I did the following:
create type foo as object (a number);
create type foolist as table of foo;
create view fooview
as select
cast(multiset(
select sal from emp where rownum < 2)
as foolist) list1,
cast(multiset(
select sal from emp where rownum < 2)
as foolist) list2
from dual;
When I request a "SELECT * FROM FOOVIEW"
through getXML I get:
<?xml version="1.0"?>
<ROWSET>
<ROW num="1">
<LIST1>
<LIST1_ITEM>
<A>800</A>
</LIST1_ITEM>
</LIST1>
<LIST2>
<LIST2_ITEM>
<A>800</A>
</LIST2_ITEM>
</LIST2>
</ROW>
</ROWSET>
So this appears fixed in the next code drop.
In the interim, I'll email you the new JAR file until (since it won't be on OTN for a few more days).
null

MRP Scheduling with a material with multiple production versions scrap rate

Greetings all.
I have a problem with MRP scheduling. How do you account for different loss rates or scrap rates on a material because of multiple versions of a material that are in production. For example, we have an item. There are two differen ways to make that item and both have different loss rates or scrap rates. How do we account for this. And whatt happens when you have these with multiple routings. Thanks.

Dear,
It can be handled in 3 ways.
1st way - Create 2 versions to represent 2 ways of production. Create a 3rd version name it as total and make it as a first version so that MRP will take this version for scheduling. In total version give the most correct scrap qty and timming in routing. Hence when you run MRP system will consider the total version, then change the varsion in planned order as per your requirement.
Second way - Create 2 version and if you are using Demand planning, in MD61 against the qty represent the version number so that when youn run MRP, the planned order will carry the version.
3rd way - Create 2 Production version and create a quota arrangement and assihgn these two Production version as Quota items and give the % share. Hence when youn run MRP system will share the demand qty into two different version as per Quiota arrangement(setting in MRP2 is necessary fir planning).
Please come back which one you are looking for so that we can give furthur information

Products with multiple attributes

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for