Profile for Workflow

Hi,
is/are there any standard profiles for Workflow Development and Administration which has access to all important T-codes for Workflow Development and Administration.
Aditya

Hi Aditya,
The required profile is : SAP_BC_BMT_WFM_ADMIN
Hope this helps.
Regds,
Akshay

Similar Messages

How to fix Workflow failed to get user profile for user:

hi All,
How to fix Workflow failed to get user profile for user when using Lookup function in sharepoint designer?

Try to use “As string” instead of “Login Name” for the “Return field as”.
Regards,
Jayant
jayant prabhakar

Do I need to set AI colour profiles for use in ID?

My previous set up:
Mac
CS2 (Illustrator, Photoshop, Bridge)
Quark XPress 7
My new set up:
PC (Win 7)
CS5 (Illustrator, Photoshop, Bridge, InDesign)
My problem:
I work for a company that prints newspapers, but my dept also does work for glossy sheetfed printers (magazines leaflets etc)
All my work is exclusively CMYK.
With my previous set up - I didn’t want to have to switch my colour profiles via Bridge as I was constantly juggling two types of jobs:
Our tabloid press - Profile - ISOnewspaper26v4 (CMYK)
Sheetfed Printers - Profile - ISO Coated V2 (Fogra 39) (CMYK)
So I set my CS2 Suite colour settings to ISO Coated V2 (Fogra 39) and set an action in Photoshop to convert jpegs / eps photos to ISOnewspaper26v4.
So my CS2 working space was set for Sheetfed glossy publications and if I wanted to set a picture to the correct profile for newsprint I just had to open the picture and hit the action that applied the ISOnewspaper26v4 profile.
Regarding Quark – I set up separate templates for each type of job:
One for Profile - ISO Coated V2 (Fogra 39) and one for - Profile - ISOnewspaper26v4.
Regarding Illustrator - I found that Quark 7 didn’t differentiate between Illustrator colour profiles, or if it did, it didn’t show up in ‘Usage’.
If I went to Quark Usage and went to ‘Profiles’ it only listed the Quark profile and any Photoshop profiles, not any Illustrator profiles.
So in Illustrator I just set colour profiles to ‘do not colour manage this document’. So that I only had to worry about changing profiles for Photoshop jpegs / eps’s.
So I had a good little system going that served me well and now my company decided to move us to PC’s and CS5; and I still have the same problem – juggling newsprint jobs and glossy magazine jobs and not wanting to have to synchronise my CS suite colour settings every time I switch between jobs...
So I was hoping to stick with my little system on PC / CS5.
So basically my question is, do I need to worry about Illustrator colour profiles if I am bringing Illustrator files into InDesign? (To clarify, my Illustrator files are always pure vector, so there is no chance of some rogue RGB jpeg sneaking through on a Illustrator file)
Im open to suggestions regarding my set up, but really would prefer not to have to keep switching my colour profiles.
Any help would be greatly appreciated.

First, I wasn't suggesting that your PDFs be exported to RGB, but it is a common workflow these days to keep photos in RGB until you convert them to the correct profile during the export process. This maximizes the potential for re-purposing your documents and allows you to use the same RGB photos for different output purposes without having to do separate CMYK conversions for each destination, so long as you don't need to do any tweaking after the conversion.
And to answer your question, if the .ai files have no embedded color profile they will ALWAYS be considered to use whatever the CMYK working space is in your ID file, so the numbers will be preserved. This means that there will be slight differences in color on output on different devices (the whole point of color management, after all, is to preserve the appearance of colors by altering the numbers for the output device).
Does the vector work you get from Thinstock come with an embedded profile? Is there any color that is critical for matching, such as a corporate color (which should be spot, but that's a different discussion), or do you use the same art in both the newspaper and magazine, and does the client expect a match (which we know isn't going to happen anyway)?
If there's no embedded profile when you start, there's no way to know what the color was supposed to look like, so color management is not possible, really. You can assign a profile, but you'd be guessing. Since the correct appearance at that point is unknown continuing with out color management shouldn't present a problem. The only case where you would need to manage the vector art would be if the color APPEARANCE is critical or you need it to match across different outputs, and in that case you would need to assign a profile and allow ID to preserve the profile on import and remap the numbers, which means you would likely get rich blacks someplace. Since it's unlikely that you can get a good match going from glossy to newsprint, I probably wouldn't even try -- you wouldn't want, for example, to tag the art as newsprint, and have it print subdued on the gloss if it would look better or more correct with the other profile. Color management would be much more useful if you were going from sheetfed to web on the same stock.

Using queues for workflows in 9.0.2

Has anyone used oracle advanced queuing and event driven workflows for content management within a 9.0.2 environment?
I want to submit something for subsequent processing based on a custom attribute changing, and then have a workflow initiated automatically due to a message arriving in a given queue
I've read the workflow example provided with 9.0.2 but don't really like the approach taken. I realise that 9.0.3 will probably do most of this without much effort on my part, but until the windows and web interfaces are packaged with the product again we won't be upgrading
Any ideas would be helpful
Thanks

The group needs to be the default group of the user for the user to be directed to the home page of the group.
This is so since a user can be a member of several groups and at least some of those groups can have a home page.
So which home page will the user be directed to ?
You can set the default group for the user in "Portal User Profile" for the user.
Regards,
Nachiketa

Current Lightroom / Camera Raw Camera Profile for Sony ILCE-6000 inaccurate: green cast in shadows! Capture one better! Please fix it!

Hi folks from Adobe!
Please take note that the current Lightroom / Adobe Camera Raw Camera Profile for the Sony ILCE-6000 is very inaccurate: There is a serious green cast in the shadows!
Capture One Express for Sony (which is free by the way) renders a lot more correctly!
Please correct this, since I'd rather buy the coming LR6 because of keeping my established workflow instead of going the Capture One route.
A good example can be found in the dpreview forum "LR5 A6K shadow pulling, a mess! Adobe LR is broken? "
Or search for Philp Reeves 3 weeks with the Sony A6000 review "3 Wochen mit der a6000", where he compares it to the Sony A7, using both times Lightroom to push the shadows.
The Sony A7 is fine where earth looks like brown earth, the A6000 picture looks like grass instead.
Please fix this! This is a high volume camera frequently bought by enthusiast or as second body for FF photographers. That would be really great!

I am talking about the two raw files linked in the very last post of page 6 of the Reeves comparison thread, not JPGs or screenshots of unknown manipulation. In LR they both say f/11 and ISO 100 and have a similar tone, but one is shot at twice the shutter speed as the other. This side-by-side is using Adobe Factory Defaults for each image where the profile is Adobe Standard, the toning sliders are all 0, tone-curve linear, and the Sharpening and Color NR are 25:
However, when I look at the camera-embedded JPGs, side-by-side, the 1/80th image on the left is darker than the 1/40th image on the right, as expected given the reported shutter-speed difference:
And it is indeed the darker image that has more shadow problems, also as expected.
When I do manipulate the darker (a6000) raw file in LR, I do see that the shadows are greenish when brightened unlike most other cameras which usually show magenta, which is the combination of the blue and red sensors showing more noise because there are half-as-many photosites as compared to the green, so I am seeing what people are complaining about and would expect shadow noise to be purple not green, I'm more concerned that these two example raws aren't actually comparable due to apparent differences in exposure. It is also odd that the lens listed in LR is different than the lens listed in the filename, so either someone has mistakenly or deliberately renamed the file wrong or someone or something has changed the EXIF parameters that LR is reporting to be the same when they're really not.

Lens profile for Fuji HS10

Hi everybody, hope this is the place to finally solve my problem.
I bought myself a Fujifilm HS10 some time ago (don't laugh at me just for that).
And the Raw-Converter that comes with it (of course) works perfectly with regards to distortion correction, but is not very nice to handle otherwise.
A friend owns Lightroom and I'm totally amazed by it's workflow and simplicity.
But manually correction each image for distortion is not really an option.
Now I know, there's a profile on Lens Downloader, but I found this to be sub-optimal at best. Especially in the mid-zoom area, quite a lot of distortion remains.
Then I tried to create a profile on my own. This one yields different results. Better on some focal lengths, worse as other. But again, not really useable. (guess, because I don't have tripod and generally can't consider myself a good photographer).
So I wonder if maybe around here, there's someone who hast created a smoothly working profile for the HS10 on their own, that they might be willing to share.
Unless I find a profile that shows the same results as the boxed software, there's really no sense for me to spend money on a different software, this being Lightroom.
So, thanks for any help in advance,
Clock

Clock,
My understanding is that the focal length makes the biggest difference for geometric distortion, followed by focus distance (because it moves the lens elements, but to a lesser degree than for focal length. Aperture makes little difference for geometric distortion, but can affect chromatic aberration and vignetting. So whether you need additional apertures depends on how much vignetting and CA you see away at apertures different from what you used for the shoot.
For different focus groups and the issue of half-filling the view, you can make up for that with more shots. It seems the important thing is the size of to squares on the target in pixels. That's why I shot 25 images at 4.2mm, but only 9 elsewhere. The layout for the nine was a 3x3 grid: upper left, center left, lower left, upper center, center, lower center, upper right, center right, lower right. For the 25 shots at 4.2mm, it was a 5x5 grid instead. For different focus distances, I would suggest using a target that has the appropriate size squares, and take the number of shots that you need so that every portion of the frame has at least one shot with a target there.
I just bought a Sony SLT-a33 with the Sony 18-250mm f3.5-6.3 zoom (SAL-18250), which isn't yet profiled, so I'm intending to do a more comprehensive shoot for that, with different focus groups. That's what I'll probably do. I'm going to try to get additional prints of larger size targets, though. I can print up to 12x18 at work.
I took some shots of a rectilinear grid card at different focal lengths and distances to have some idea of the quality of the profile, and did note that there were some issues at some of the mid- to longer focal lengths.
I also found it interesting that the Fuji camera seems to be doing lens distortion (as well as CA) correction in its processor. (Not in Raw mode, of course.) My profile seemed about as good as the in-camera correction, better in some areas, and not quite as good in others.
With respect to mounting and indoors vs. outdoors, I found that didn't matter as much as you might think. I clipped my target to a clipboard and clamped the opposite end to hold the target flat, and then propped it up at an angle under some ceiling lights for more-or-less uniform illumination. Then I shot from a tripod at an appropriate distance away. I could vary the distance up to about 20 feet across my living room. The software seems pretty sophisticated, and takes advantage of the multiple shots to figure out how to compensate for the lighting variation. So you don't need a studio/bench setup and an enormous amount of space. You might not have to wait till it stops snowing. What else are you going to do, anyway, when you can't really go out much?
Happy profiling!
Dave

Which Color profile for softprofing to print to Apple's book services?

I'm looking for a simple, specific and official answer as to which specific ColorSync profile should I choose for 'Onscreen Proofing' in Aperture? My intended output is Apples Print Services (Hardcover book).
I've crawled the web looking for this simple answer with no luck.
It seems to me that this profile (ie an accurate characterization of Apple's Printing Services) should be at the top of the list (in View/Proofing Profile/). Instead all I could find are discussion forums which hint or guess as to which profile to use.
Alternatively. It should be documented in the manual or the "How to create great looking books?" articles something like: "If you are going to order a book from Apple, then choose the sRGB profile for onscreen proofing. Apple's services are calibrated to this profile and guarantee consistent results". <-- Something like this appears nowhere!
So again. I'm printing my books ($$$) on Apple. Which Proofing profile should I choose?

I'm looking for a simple, specific and official answer as to which specific ColorSync profile should I choose for 'Onscreen Proofing' in Aperture? ... Alternatively. It should be documented in the manual or the "How to create great looking books?" articles something like: "If you are going to order a book from Apple, then choose the sRGB profile for onscreen proofing. Apple's services are calibrated to this profile and guarantee consistent results".
Not sRGB, argghhh -:)
In a colour matching conversion, you have a source colour space (in this case, your ICC type MNTR Monitor profile for your RGB working space) and a destination colour space (in this case an unknown ICC profile, probably of type PRTR Printer).
Your aim in the ICC architecture is to capture into and correct in as large a source colour space as is necessary to contain the colours you can render on the largest colour spaces of displays, printers and presses. This excludes sRGB as source by definition.
The sRGB colour space is the colour space of an HDTV cathode ray tube. This colour space cannot hold colours a lot of output devices can render, including the pure cyan of an ISO 12647 offset printing condition on art paper, and for inkjet sRGB is even worse as source.
Open the Apple ColorSync Utility, select sRGB in the RGB profiles list, click the Disclosure (triangle) icon in the CIELa*b plot, and select Hold for Comparison. Then pick an inkjet profile in the RGB profiles list or a large gamut offset profile in the CMYK profiles list, and turn the 3D graphic to see what can be matched directly and what can be matched only by reshaping the colours.
PDF printing masters can either have only the source ICC profile(s) embedded or both the source and destination ICC profiles. In the former case, the colour matching is done at runtime and you have to wait to see what prints.
In the latter case, you embed the destination ICC profile as OutputIntent and submit PDF/X-3. Since you are allowed to embed either type PRTR Printer or type MNTR Monitor profiles as OutputIntent, and since both are bidirectional for printing as well as for proofing, you have a contract proofing condition.
But in order to work with PDF/X-3 you need to know enough about rendering intents and gamut mapping behaviours that you don't set the wrong rendering intent per object in the page. So a runtime rendering workflow ensures that you get to draw to the maximum gamut available in the printing service, without giving you advanced controls.
/hh

Error: Lock profile for approval procedure not maintained in Customizing

Hi,
We are working on the CHARM approval process. I have noticed that without selecting an approval procedure, I select the status (Awaiting business approval) on which the approval workflow is triggered, the system gives below error:
Select an approval procedure first
Lock profile for approval procedure not maintained in Customizing
Approval procedure and approval steps are locked automatically
This locks the approval procedure and the RFC can no longer be processed further. Why is that happening ? Anyone can select the status by mistake and lose the RFC, is there a way to stop this or at least reset it ? the lock procedure is already maintained in approval procedure customizing.
Best Regards.

Hi Karthik,
Thanks for the quick reply, however the settings mentioned on page 38 are already in place i.e. the approval procedure gets determined correctly based on change category (rule policy) and also is locked after putting it to 'Awaiting Approval'
But the problem exists - setting the status 'Awaiting App.' without selecting app.proc, will result in a total lock of the RFC.

Worflow failed to get user profile for user

I have a workflow that sends an email to a user. In the workflow email, one line has the lookup [%User Profiles:Name%], with Return field "As String" of the list item Field "Account Name" with Value "Current Item:Created By".
This workflow works for everyone, except it Errors when one user creats an item in this list. The error is "Workflow failed to get user profile for user... System Account - An error has occurred in Workflow Name"
and more detailed error found in logs: "AutoStart Workflow: Microsoft.SharePoint.SPException: Recursive workflows are not permitted.     at Microsoft.SharePoint.Workflow.SPWorkflowAutostartEventReceiver.<>c__DisplayClass1.<AutoStartWorkflow>b__0(SPSite
superUserSite, SPWeb superUserWeb)
System.InvalidOperationException: Workflow failed to get user profile for user:domainName\username.     at Microsoft.Office.Workflow.Actions.UserProfileHelper.GetProfile(String propertyName, String user)     at Microsoft.Office.Workflow.Actions.ProfileHelperBase.GetProfileString(String
propertyName, String userOrOrganization)     at Microsoft.Office.Workflow.Actions.GetUserProfileActivity.Execute(ActivityExecutionContext context)     at System.Workflow.ComponentModel.ActivityExecutor`1.Execute(T activity,
ActivityExecutionContext executionContext)     at System.Workflow.ComponentModel.ActivityExecutor`1.Execute(Activity activity, ActivityExecutionContext executionContext)     at System.Workflow.ComponentModel.ActivityExecutorOperation.Run(IWorkflowCoreRuntime
workflowCoreRuntime)     at System.Workflow.Runtime.Scheduler.Run() "
When I run "get-addomain -identity [FQDN]", I noticed that our DNSRoot has a totally different name than our NetBIOSName, so I followed this article and made sure to set netbiosdomainnamesenabled to TRUE:
http://meandmysharepoint.blogspot.ca/2012/09/netbiosdomainnamesenabled-and.html
To give you an idea of our setup, our DNSRoot is "abc.domain.com" and our NetBIOSName is "TESTING"; 2 totally different names. When I run "get-addomain -identity [FQDN]", the Name field is: "abc" (just the first
part of the DNSRoot); therefore, when I look up this user's profile in Sharepoint Manage User Profiles, his account shows as "abc\username" when it should be "TESTING\username".
I did an IISReset, and I ran a Full Profile Sync. But the workflow still Errors for this user.
Any ideas how to fix this? Should I delete MySites and User Profile Service application and recreate them?
Any tips would be appreciated.
thanks!

Hi,
According to your description, my understanding is that the error occurred when sending an email to the user in workflow.
Did you delete the existing Connections before setting NetBiosDomainNamesEnabled?
If not, I recommend to delete and recreate your AD connections, then set NetBiosDomainNamesEnabled to true.
Or you can delete the original User Profile Service Application and create a new one, then set the NetBiosDomainNamesEnabled to true and start the User Profile Service Application
synchronization.
More reference:
http://social.technet.microsoft.com/wiki/contents/articles/18060.sharepoint-20xx-what-if-the-domain-netbios-name-is-different-than-the-fqdn-of-the-domain-with-user-profile.aspx
Best regards.
Thanks
Victoria Xia
TechNet Community Support

A way to activate ICC profiles for all applied images

Hi there!
I think there should be an option in InDesign to activate the ICC profiles for all the applied images.
For those who work with PDF/X-4 and a Workflow-based Color Management, it's very important to take the images' profiles into account.
I tried and tried, but could not find a way to make it all at once in InDesign.
Today I have to change the color settings so the INDD's profiles won't match the Color Settings' one, and then open the INDD choosing "Activate All Profiles" on the "Profile mismatch" window.
It could have an option to choose to activate only the CMYK or RGB profiles and even choose what profiles to activate or not.
Who would agree with me?
Tiago Cheregati

First of all thanks for your help, Dov.
I may be wrong, but from the tests I made, the image's ICC profile is honored only if the InDesign Color Settings CMYK field is set to "Preserve Embedded Profiles".
If, at the moment that you place it, Color Settings are set to "Preserve Numbers (Ignore linked profiles), InDesign will "forget" the ICC, and won't send it to the PDF/X-4 even if you ask him to.
Now, I don't remember which is the default option for InDesign's Color Settings, but we receive a lot of .indd files (most of them books) whose images are profile-ignored. And then either we change it one-by-one or we assing another profile for the .indd, save, close, open it again and ask him to "re-enable" the profiles in the Profile Mismatch window. As I mentioned above.
So, in response to your question, I wanted InDesign to offer live control to these options, so I can send to the PDF what I really wanted in an easier way.
Again, I may be standing on a wrong supposition.
Of course our heads together will think better than one.
Best wishes,
Tiago Cheregati

IOS 6.1.4 released for iPhone 5 Adds an Updated Audio Profile for Speakerphone

Apple has just released an Over the Air update for the iPhone 5. It seems to only provide an updated audio profile for the speaker phone. Nothing else listed in the change log.
I would assume that there will be an iTunes downloadable update available shortly.

It obviously is because you didnt understand. The iphone 4's last update to IOS 6.1.3 in some cases caused the phones speakers to not work (in which this happened to mine and a few people I know) which some people got rid of their phones. HENCE the AUDIO UPDATE that they recently posted but only iPhone 5 can download the update. That is my problem. I have alot of apple products diesel vdub and have had apple for a long time but I can't seem to understand why they would do this and I posted this in hopes to find more people that have had this issue and if they did anything to help fix it this issue. Thank you for your concern though.

Can't see the installed icc profiles for my paper in print module

I have downloaded and installed the icc profiles for my favourite Canson and Crane Museo papers on my new Macbook Pro but they don't show up in the options box in the LR 4 print module. Is there another step I have missed? Thanks in advance.

Where did you install the profiles? They should go into
Library/Colorsync/Profiles in your home folder or at the root level of your
hard disk. If you put it in that folder in your home folder, they show up
in user, if you put them in the root Library folder, they show up in
"Computer" in Colorsync utility

How do I use the same profile for two users on the same computer

I use my laptop both at home and at work. And in each venue I use a different user log on. But I wish to have firefox use the same profile for each user log on. How can I get firefox to point to the same profile for each user?

Note that only one user (Firefox instance) can use a profile folder at the time, so if you would switch the Windows user to another account then you would first have to close Firefox.
* http://kb.mozillazine.org/Creating_a_new_Firefox_profile_on_Windows
* http://kb.mozillazine.org/Shortcut_to_a_specific_profile
* http://kb.mozillazine.org/Using_multiple_profiles_-_Firefox
* http://kb.mozillazine.org/Bypassing_the_Profile_Manager

How can I launch firefox on different displays simultaneously without creating profiles for each of them

On my solaris server, there is an application which, in order to display some information, opens the browser. The server can be accessed thorugh X windows by various users. The issue is that whn firefox is open on one display, it fails to open on another display.
The resolution for this problem as suggested by a lot of users on various forums is to create different profiles for various firefox instances. However, everytime my application will launch firefox, i will have to invoke it with -P option which will pop up the profile manager. I do not wish to show the pop up for creating profiles:(. Is there some way to allow multilple instances of firefox to run on different displays?

when you lock the preferences with the mozilla.cfg file in the firefox program folder as it's described in the mozillazine kb article above, it should apply for all users...

Can anyone help me change the DOB on my sons profile for his apple I'd so I can setup family sharing? I originally put both ids in my name. He is 19 do it keeps saying needs my permission but no instructions in how to get that done?

Can anyone help me change the DOB on my sons profile for his apple I'd so I can setup family sharing? I originally put both ids in my name. He is 19 do it keeps saying needs my permission but no instructions in how to get that done? His phone was stollen once last month need to get this done ASAP to prevent future headaches. Ty

You can not change the date of birth on the account. Apple makes that clear up front when the account is created.
The only way to "fix" this is going to be for him to create a new account with the correct information. Any apps purchased with the old one will need to be re-purchased with the new account. They can not be transferred.

Profile for Workflow

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for