Profiles and 6650 Fold

Is it possible to either create new profiles or add existing settings to current profiles for my 6650 Fold cell phone ?
Solved!
Go to Solution.

There is no Tools | Profiles on the 6650 Fold. There is a Profiles button on the main screen. When I click that I am brought to a list of profiles. If I then choose Options, I do see the Create New.
If I choose Customize for any given profile, I do not see any menu item in the Options which allows me to add new settings other than the list of settings which are already there.
Also when I Create New profile, it is given the name 'New Profile' and I don't see any way to change that to the name I want.

Similar Messages

Naming new profile on 6650 Fold

I can create a new profile on my 6650 Fold but it is named "New Profile" and I see no way to give it a distinctive name. Does anybody know how this is done ?
Solved!
Go to Solution.

select profile outdoor for example scroll through set the tones etc you want when it comes down to end of list you can change the profile name there.
If i have helped at all a click on the white star below would be nice thanks.
Now using the Lumia 1520

I recently transfered my Thunderbird Profile and messages folder from XP comp to a Win 7. Now I can't open my inbox messages. Help

I had Thunderbird installed and operating fine on my XP computer with my messages kept in a truecrypt folder. (Not default location) I have a new computer with Win 7. I read support files that directed me to move my profiles folder from my XP computer into the newly created profiles folder for the Win 7 computer. Then I copied my truecrypt folder to my new computer. Then I went in to the account settings for all 4 email accounts I keep track of and fixed the Local Directory for message storage under server settings to point correctly to my messages folders in truecrypt folder.
Now when I try to access my inbox for any of the email accounts I get the working circle (old XP hourglass) infinitly. Ultimately I never get to see any old or new messages.
I did notice that if I select the inbox of any email account and then select edit folder properties, the location is blank but it will not allow me to change it or correct it.
Any ideas?

This was the only answer that came up on my search, so please don't get so testy. I don't have my iphone with me, since I switched phones. Apple support will not let you call them, get a call from them, chat with them, etc without first putting in your serial number. What next- anyone else have an idea?

I used "my documents" for the profile folder, I removed the profile and firefox asked if i want to remove its file, and it took ALL my file except a few, all my photographs etc, are these now unrecoverable? as they are not in the recycle bin

I used "my documents" for the profile folder, I removed the profile and firefox asked if i want to remove its file, and it took ALL my file except a few, all my photographs etc, are these now unrecoverable? as they are not in the recycle bin
disaster, thanks firefox 1 year of photos lost

Thanks for the obvious question. I mean it. The very same thought came to me this morning and, sure enough, I had booted into another drive--my old one that, of course, had the old desktop, etc.
It didn't dawn on me that this was the case since I hadn't set it as a boot drive but I guess in the course of all the restarts I did, it got switched.
I'm back to normal again.

Error 1321 when updating Adobe Acrobat Pro even if profile has admin rights and parent folder has full access privileges.

Error 1321 when updating Adobe Acrobat Pro even if profile has admin rights and parent folder has full access privileges.
Exact error below:
error 1321: the installer has insufficient privileges to modify the file C:\Program Files (x86)\Adobe\Acrobat 10.0\Acrobat\Xtras\AdobePDF\I386\[dll file]
Thanks in advance!

My first thought is to not just apply permissions to the folder but be sure to apply them to all objects inside them. It would be interesting to see if you can rename this file, then rename it back to its original name; this would test permissions nondestructively.

User Profiles, Roles and Permission folder empty

Hi,
We installed Peoplesoft 8.49 Apps 9.0, and 10G Oracle on Windows 2003, everything working perfectly except User profiles and Roles and Permission Folders
I have ran AE scripts well, even then we are not able to browse those sections
Any help much appreciated
Thanks

>
We installed Peoplesoft 8.49 Apps 9.0, and 10G Oracle on Windows 2003, everything working perfectly except User profiles and Roles and Permission Folders
>
What do you mean by this? What is not working? What are you expecting and what is happening?

"Could not initialize the application's security component" already erased mozilla directory containing profiles and the other in x86, problem persists!

This has just happened. But I have erased the mozilla directories containing the profiles and as well the both mozilla directories in program files x86. Yet when Firefoz is reinstalled, problem recurs.
Receive again the message "Could not initialize the application security component."
Have looked at the fixes available. Those appear not to work.
Anyone else with ideas? Maybe some hidden files that I can search for on my computer, and erase?
I'm suspecting I need really a thorough erase of anything connected with Firefox, to solve this issues. Thought though I had found everything.
Not relishing the prospect of erasing the hard-disc to fix this, though that has 100% probability of working.
My computer is running Wista 64.

Rename secmod.db (secmod.db.old) in the Firefox Profile Folder in case there is a problem with the file.
Firefox will create new files.
* https://support.mozilla.org/kb/Could+not+initialize+the+browser+security+component
You can use this button to go to the Firefox profile folder:
*Help > Troubleshooting Information > Profile Directory: Open Containing Folder

Use DISM to add drivers returns an error on an image which has profiles and programdata on a seperate volume

Hi,
We capture and modify W7 Ent and Pro OS images on a regular base by using DISM to add drivers for example. Until now we never had a problem because we always had images which only had 1 OS volume captured. DISM works fine to mount the image to a mount
folder, add drivers, and save the changes in the image.
However now we encounter an issue when doing the same actions on an image where the \Windows folder was located on the C:\ volume and \programdata and \users folders where redirected to a D:\ volume.
When mounting the C:\ volume image (including everything except \programdata and \users folders) the error we receive when trying to add or get drivers is:
Error 3 - the \Windows folder is not a valid Windows directory.
The DISM.Log file show right before this error that the remote registry could not be contacted.
This is caused I think because the registry files are located on the \Users folder, but since this folder is not captured in the image (located on another volume during capture) it cannot find the registry.
My question is: how can we resolve this?
What we have now is 1 WIM file where index1 is the OS (C:\ volume) and index2 is the \ProgramData and \Users folders (D:\ volume). Probably the way of capturing the image and redirecting programdata/users is not done in a correct way...
Note: the image index1 and index2 restore works fine - the unattended.xml contains also redirection to the folders paths for \programdata and \users...
Any help or advice would greatly be appreciated!
Thx.
Steve
Wkr, Steve

Hi Steve,
You can be right that DISM don’t support the scenario that User profile and System are in the separated volumes.
As a workaround, we should use the defaults to put the profile on C: during capture image, and then set the profile path to be on the D: drive after the image deploying.
Please refer to below KB for how to using Sysprep to redirect profiles’ locations.
Customize the default local user profile when preparing an image of Windows
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/973289/en-hk
Hope these could be helpful.
Kate Li
TechNet Community Support

Where are the Firefox profiles files stored in Windows 7? I currently have Firefox 3.6.24 profiles and have installed 3.6.24 on Win7. How can I get Firefox to read my profile

I just want to copy the profiles off the old xp machine onto the new Win 7 machine and run Firefox 3.6.24 on it. Then I'll upgrade to a newer Firefox later.

Profile is a folder which store all your personal data in a safe place
* https://support.mozilla.com/en-US/kb/Profiles
* here explain how to backup profile https://support.mozilla.com/en-US/kb/Backing%20up%20your%20information
* here explain how to restore it
https://support.mozilla.com/en-US/kb/Recovering%20important%20data%20from%20an%20old%20profile

How do I restore my profiles and email messages?

My work computer repaired a disk problem and now all my profiles and emails are gone from Thunderbird. Thunderbird starts up like it's just been installed. My system is Windows 7.
Thanks in advance for helping.

Do you have a backup of your Thunderbird profile folder?

CCP colour profiles and different lenses

Hi,
I just got a Nikon D7000 and I've been playing around with my ColourChecker Passport to set up some standard colour profiles for use in ACR as a general starting point for processing. I've been pondering if it's worth my while to create different profiles for each lens I have, something I've not previously done when profiling my old D60, where I just created a series of profiles (including some dual-illuminants) by using one lens and capturing the target under a variety of different lighting conditions (e.g. tungsten, flash, sunshine, etc).
Anyway, I just tried creating a profile for my 105mm 2.8 lens under tungsten lighting, having previously (yesterday) created one under the same lighting with my 50mm 1.4 lens and I've been comparing them in ACR using the colour dropper. I’ve opened up the images used to create the profiles, applied the profile generated using the ColourChecker software for the corresponding lens, and then set the white balance using the ‘off-white’ colour patch with the eye dropper WB tool. I then used the colour dropper on the same colour patches in each image. I’ve noticed that the RGB colour values aren’t matching quite as well as I’d expected (note that I thought it potentially unrealistic to get a perfect match): blues and greens seem to be roughly the same, so for example with patch #3 (third from left on the top row), one is at 69,72,115 and one at 70,77,115, but reds and oranges seem to be a bit further out of sync, e.g. with patch #15, one is at 99,45,29 and one at 109,51,34; with patch #16 one is at 166,167,29 and one at 175,179,33. This surprises me a little, as I thought the idea of CC was to calibrate the profiles so that colours were essentially the same across different lenses – and different cameras if applicable. I have to say though that, colour values aside, when eyeballing the two images on my monitor (profiled) they do look very similar, which I guess is the main thing!
I wonder if perhaps I’m missing something here? I’m quite prepared to be told that I’ve got this all wrong!
Also, I wonder if others on the forum using CCP have gone to the trouble of creating lens-specific profiles, or if they’ve just created profiles for their camera body using one lens? This is the approach I took with my D60, but having done more reading on CCP I know that some folk do advise to create separate profiles for each lens they use (and I am of course aware that the CCP user manual also states to do this). Do you even create a profile for each and every shoot (when possible)?
I’d be very interested to hear your opinions on this as I’ve not been using CCP for all that long and am always eager to learn more.
M

First of all, a color profile is for correcting color, not luminance, so compare the HSL or Lab coordinates not the RGB values so you can just ignore the L coordinate. From your given RGB numbers, you can already tell that one of the images is brighter than the other so it is just confusing looking at the RGB values and guessing what you would expect the three values to be in the other image. For comparing two images, I would concentrate on the Hue number in HSL coordinates, since Saturation can change with contrast, and Luminance can change with Exposure and Contrast.
Also, as part of your eyedroppering comparison, another thing to do would be adjust the "Exposure" of the darker image until the L number (in HSL or Lab) is the same as the L in the brighter image and then see what the other two numbers are--maybe the other two numbers won't change, and then you can try putting one of the HSL values in the "Old" patch of the color-picker and the other in the "New" patch and see how much different they look. You'll have to do this comparison in Photoshop not ACR so use ProPhotoRGB when you export to keep the colors as close to the same as you can.
The two questions you seem to have, are: does using a lens-specific profile make enough difference to real world situations to bother with, and where are the variations I'm seeing when the profiles are applied to their source images coming from since I would think they would be the same.
For testing whether the profiles computed for the two lenses make a noticeable difference even with your two profiles that don't appear to correct the same, apply the two profiles to the SAME CC image (one of the two you created your profiles with), save an sRGB JPG of each, and see if you can tell the difference, either side-by-side, or even better, when you flip back and forth in some sort of photo viewer--like with Windows Picture Viewer when those are the only two images in the folder. By apply the two profiles to the same image you have mitigated any luminance and white-balance differences in the source image and are merely looking for differences in the effect of the two profiles.
If you can't tell much difference between the same image using each of the two profiles then it's just an academic exercise. I like academic exercises, but am also a perfectionist and lazy so I would do the experimenting until I found out I'd perfected things enough that I can't tell any difference then I can stop. In other words, do I need to profile for various lenses or not, or am I just doing it because I like to control everything as much as possible and it really doesn't make any difference.
Before answering the other question, about where any profile variations might be coming from, understand that the combination of white-balance and color-profile is attempting to convert the colors of an object photographed in the lighting scenario the profile was created for into the colors of the object photographed in a standard lighting scenario. In my mind the works out to be "make the colors of the object look like it was photographed in sunlight". The issue that requires making a profile and not just white-balancing, is that any part of the object that was colored the same as the light color will be neutral when the white-balance is done, and more generally the closer the color of the object is to the color of the light, the more neutral it will become when WB is done. For example, if you have a red ball and a gray ball and photograph them in red light, they will both look gray when white-balanced. A real-world example of this would be flesh-tones in incandescent light, when white-balanced will have even less color and be more neutral or pale or even bluish, than the skin photographed in sunlight, so after white-balancing, the job of an incandescent profile is to boost the reddish colors and diminish the bluish colors so the skin looks like it would in sunlight. This might be an argument for NOT WBing skin in incandescent lighting. In severely-colored lighting, especially nearly monochromatic lighting such as sodium vapor lighting, correcting the colors to be as if in sunlight will be impossible, but to the extent the lighting isn't monochromatic, the colors can be made to look more normal, if not perfectly normal..
To understand whether the differences you're seeing in the profiles are due to the lenses being different color or due to variations in the profiling process, itself, think about where the variations could come from and how you might test for each:
Was the source lighting exactly the same color between the two shots with different lenses (that were taken a day apart)? Test by eyedroppering the WB of same neutral-color patch in each photo and see if there is any difference in the Temp/Tint numbers. You cannot test the source-lighting color unless you have shot with the SAME lens for both days, so if you don't have shots with the same lens, seeing that the WB is not much different between the two shots can give you some comfort that the difference in the profile was not a difference in the source lighting. The source lighting might have changed if there was some daylight mixing in on one day and not the next, or if the A/C was running on one day and not the other and the voltage was slightly different and the redness of the light was different. One other thing that can wreak havoc in repeatability of both color and exposure is if any of the lighting is fluorescent CFL or tubes, because that sort of gas lighting changes intensity as the voltage varies and reverses 60-times per second and this variation is especially noticeable if the shutter is fast. So while your lighting may have been incandescent any changing daylight or flickering fluorescent lighting mixed in might have changed the source-lighting color enough to make a variation in the profile more than the color of the lenses might have.
This first question dealt with the photos taken with each of the two lenses. The remaining questions are about testing with just one lens.
Is the profiling process repeatable? Test by creating two different profiles from the SAME CC photo and be a little sloppy about when marking the corner patches, and see if you get different numbers applying those two profiles. An idea where things might not be repeatable, is that there are slightly variations in the color of the color patches (you should be able to move the eyedropper across the color patch and see if the RGB numbers change) due to slight color noise and depending on where you put the "corner" markers on the CC image, you'll get slightly different results.
Does the exposure make any difference? You can determine this by taking a photograph using the SAME lens in the SAME lighting (a few seconds apart), and just varying the exposure by 1/2 or 2/3 of a stop, and then computing a profile for each exposure and apply those two profiles to one of the exposures and see if the non-L coordinates of HSL or Lab eyedroppered.
If you check all these variations you'll have an idea of how much each affects the profile and then can judge if the magnitude of the differences you're seeing are related to variations with creating the profile, or actually related to differences in the lenses and thus a new profile for each lens might be warranted, assuming you can tell the difference, still. I mean even if you can tell the difference between the profiles created with different lenses, are the differences from the lens significantly more than the differences due to exposure or lighting color or corner-patch placement?
I haven't tried computing a profile for each lens; however, I have created a dual-illuminant profile (2700K and 6500K) and then computed new color-matrix slider values (the ones under where you set the profile) for various lighting conditions using Tindemans' script and despite the slider values being not close to zero, I can hardly tell any difference on the few images I've looked at. Once exception to not having the color-matrix sliders make much difference is when using the dual-illuminant profile with fluorescent lighting, which has a significant Tint value compared to either of the standard illuminants, but in the case of fluorescent lighting, I'd rather compute a whole new profile, than use a slider-corrected dual-illuminant profile.
Besides eyedroppering Lab or HSL coordinates in Photoshop, another way to check for color variations is to create a color-error plot in the Color Check module of Imatest and see how far the squares and circles are off from each other for each color-patch. An example of such a color-error plot is linked below, where it shows how far off the colors of a color-checker are in incandescent lighting after computing a color-profile in incandescent lighting. You'd expect them to be completely correct, but they aren't, and is a lesson in color profiles only being to go part way in making the colors look as if they were photographed in sunlight:
http://www.pbase.com/ssprengel/image/101322979
If you click on the above image, you will return to the thumbnails for color-error the gallery, and in the gallery description you can see links to both Imatest and Tindemans' script if you care to pursue things more in depth. Imatest is not free but does have a free 30-day trial, which should be enough time to get some useful information out of it.

I use v20.0.2, and restart using same windows and tabs is NOT working. I have deleted profile and restarted, etc., but nothing seems to work. What now?

Not sure what else that I can provide here. This particular software function does not seem to work.

In case you are using "Clear history when Firefox closes":
*do not clear Browsing History
*Tools > Options > Privacy > Firefox will: "Use custom settings for history": [X] "Clear history when Firefox closes" > Settings
*https://support.mozilla.org/kb/Clear+Recent+History
Note that clearing "Site Preferences" clears all exceptions for cookies, images, pop-up windows, software installation, and passwords.
You can check for problems with the sessionstore.js and sessionstore.bak files in the Firefox profile folder that store session data.
Delete the sessionstore.js file and possible sessionstore-##.js files with a number and sessionstore.bak in the Firefox profile folder.
*Help > Troubleshooting Information > Profile Directory: Show Folder
*http://kb.mozillazine.org/Profile_folder_-_Firefox
Deleting sessionstore.js will cause App Tabs and Tab Groups and open and closed (undo) tabs to get lost and you will have to recreate them (make a note or bookmark them).
*http://kb.mozillazine.org/Multiple_profile_files_created
If you use cleanup software like CCleaner then check the settings for the Firefox application.

6650 fold: how to add new languages

Hello,
I have moved from a Nokia 3110 Classic to a 6650 fold which should be an upgrade and include all functions of the smaller model. With the 3110 Classic I could select Spanish as input language which helps quite a bit in writing messages (T9 adds accents, etc.). But the 6650 fold does not offer Spanish. I live in Germany and thus have the T-Mobile branding. How can I add more languages to the phone? I have plenty of space on my MicroSDHC card.

Thanks for the tip. I bought a higher end mobile with a Symbian 60 operating system to be ready for business and world wide use. Unfortunately, the 6650 fold is not suitable for this task. I expected that even more languages than on the 3110 classic are preinstalled on the 6650 fold, but this is not so. I believed that an advantage of Symbian 60 is to be able to install packages on the mobile like it is possible on the PC by downloading it onto the mobile. I do not bring my PC to my dealer just to change the language of the user interface or the input language. The mobile has a firmware and much space for storage of languages. I added an 8 GB microSDHC card. I am not pleased by this deliberate policy and will change to another more free operating system as soon as possible. Maybe I can even install another operating system onto the 6650, I do not know. Way to go for Nokia to provide a useful gadget for the travelling business user!

Home Made Ringtones & the 6650 Fold

I have a 6650 Nokia phone. I a currently trying to figure out all the features.
I was wondering if I could make my own ringtones and use them on this particular phone.
Now, I don't know how to make ringtones, meaning I don't know what program to use and where to get a program, and I don't know how to get home made ringtones to my phone, if it is at all possible to do.
Are there any tutorials that explain the possibility of making my own ringtones and using them on my 6650 Fold?
As you can see, I am clueless about this and need instructions or tutorials to help me. Any advice or help is greatly appreciated.
Bartholomew

Garaageband is a Mac program (part of the iLife programs which come with the Mac). The new version makes it easy to create a ringtone, and has a Send to iPhone option to make it easy to sync.
I think you can only use it with original music, not commercial music. Although I'm sure people are getting around that...
Bonnie

Camera Profiles and Lens Profiles are missing in ACR 8.2.

Yesterday I tried to install a new update for CS CC, but it failed. Then I uninstalled the app completely, and installed it again.
When I opened ACR 8.2 I found out that there were no Camera profiles and LensProfiles (as it used to be before). Instead of usual Camera Profile was Matrix. There were no Lens Profiles in Photoshop Lens Corrections either.
The folder C/.../App Data/Roaming/Adobe/CameraRaw/LensProfilesDefault was also empty.
I reinstalled the application a couple times with the same result.
How can I fix the problem?
Regards, Yulia

Well, C:\ProgramData\Adobe\CameraRaw\CameraProfiles\Adobe Standard is also completely empty.

Profiles and 6650 Fold

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for