Profiles for Canon D5?

I recently upgraded to Lightroom 3 (v3.2). I shoot with a Canon D5 and import files as raw. Under the camera calibration tab I find no profiles except the ACR 4.4. and 3.3 (neither under process 2010 or 2003). I suspect that I am doing something wrong or should I download the profiles seperately?
All help and education appreciated.

The profiles should have been installed when you installed Lightroom.  What OS?

Similar Messages

  • Profile for Canon G10 to simulate Olympus E-3 colors

    I want to create a profile for Canon G10 which will simulate Olympus E-3 colors.
    I performed the following steps, but the result is very disappointing:
    1. Photographed a GretacgMacbeth ColorChecker with a G10 and a E-3, in the same light conditions (Open shade) in RAW.
    2. Converted the RAW files to DNG with DNG Converter 5.4, all default settings.
    3. Opened the E-3 DNG file in Profile Editor. White balanced by right-click on patch #19. Set Base Profile to E-3 Adobe Standard, Color table 6500K, 'Both color tables'.
    4. Set 18 Control Points, one on each color patch, #1 to #18. Wrote down the HSL values for each.
    5. Closed the E-3 file and cleared everything.
    6. Opened the G10 DNG file in Profile Editor. White balanced by right-click on patch #19. Set Base Profile to G10 Camera Standard, Color table 6500K, 'Both color tables'.
    4. Set 18 Control Points, one on each color patch, #1 to #18. Wrote down the HSL values for each.
    7. Noted the numeric difference between the HSL values for each patch in the G10 file, vs the E-3 file.
    8. Corrected the HSL values for each control point, by the numeric difference between the two files.
    9. Saved and exported with a new name.
    Obviously I did something wrong, because the result is BAD!
    I'll appreciate it if someone could help and point me in the right direction.
    Thanks,
    Moshe

    I'd like to add two observations about my above experiment:
    1. If I change the values of a Control Point using the sliders or the point on the color wheel, the preview changes, but much less than the change of the slider. Say, I change the H slider to -10, the change in the preview is only -2, or so. Is that how it should be?
    2. If I hover with the cursor over a color patch in the ColorChecker preview the values change, probably due to noise, and it's difficult to decide which is the correct point. I didn't find an option, like in Photoshop, to set the sampling size so the value is an average of several pixels in all directions.
    Moshe

  • Lens Correction profile for Canon 18-200mm IS

    Hi,
    I'm looking for a profile for Canon lens EF-S 18-200mm f3.5-5.6 IS - I can't find it in Lightroom and at the moment I'm using a profile for similar lenses from Sigma and at first glance it looks ok, but I have to manually find that lens at each photo, which is quite annoying.
    I'm sure there's lots of people using same lens (as it comes included in Canon 50D PRO package which from what I hear is very popular), so maybe someone actually took an effort to create the profile using Adobe's lens profile creator?
    If anyone has got that profile handy, I would very much appreciate if you could send me a link to where I can download it from or simply contact me.
    Thanks cheaps!
    Tom

    You can choose "Save New Lens Profile Defaults" from the Setup popup menu, which will remember your choice of profile for the given {camera,lens} combo. That way you won't have to keep selecting the profile manually in the future.
    Or you can create a preset.

  • Is there a profile for Canon lenses 8-15 mm and Canon 800mm ?

    Can we upload a profile for Canon 8-15 and Canon 800mm lenses?
    If so where is it?

    Ask in the PS/ ACR/ LR forums.
    Mylenium

  • Tokina 16-28 F2.8Lens Profile for Canon 5D Mark II

    Dears,
    I want to  found a Tokina 16-28 F2.8Lens Profile for Canon 5D Mark II.  Look forward to your soonest reply

    Referencing: Victoria Bampton (Lightroom Queen)
    Your Develop Defaults, Lens Defaults and Custom Point Curves are stored at...
    Windows—C: \ Users \ [your username] \ AppData \ Roaming \ Adobe \ CameraRaw \
    Mac—Macintosh HD / Users / [your username] / Library / Application Support / Adobe / CameraRaw /
    I am guessing if you move them to the correct location they will show up.

  • Lens Profile for Canon EF 55-200 4.5-5.6 II USM

    Hello,
    Das anyone have the Lens Profile for Canon EF 55-200 4.5-5.6 II USM ?
    Thanks,
    Mário

    I'm also interested in this.
    Is there anyone out there able to provide one?

  • Tokina 12-24 F4 Lens Profile for Canon 500D

    Dear Adobe Support Specialist,
    I found a Tokina 12-24 lens profile for Canon 450D in this Forums but I am using Canon 500D.  Please kindly advise if it works on 500D too. If not, will there be one soon for download.  Look forward to your soonest reply

    Hi
    I'm not the Adobe support specialist, but I made a lens profile for my Tokina11-16 by using EOS kiss F.
    The profile works well on my EOS kiss X3 too. Thus I guess the prolide you found is also fit your 500D.
    Why not try the profile you found. you can check the profile works well or not.
    kiss F = 1000D, kiss X2 = 450D, and Kiss X3 = 500D.
    Regards
    HiROI

  • Lightroom 6 doesnt have profile for canon g16? Any ideas?

    Lightroom 6 doesnt have profile for canon g16? Any ideas?

    I found the answer to one of my questions.  The ruler for the screen dimension is part of the Profile Maker. These are good instructions.
    http://www.dpmag.com/how-to/tip-of-the-week/make-your-own-custom-lens-profiles-10-11-10.ht ml
    Richard

  • Where can I download ICC profile for Canon paper?

    Hi,
    I bought a new MacBookPro and suddenly the ICC profiles that used to be in my Canon Pixma Pro 10 are missing.  I'm specifically looking for: Canon luster, platinum, museum etching.  Can anyone point me to the right direction please?  Thanks.

    I am having a similar problem.  I had previously printed on my new Canon Pixma Pro 10 to Canon Photo Paper Pro Luster from my MacBook Pro retina running 10.10.3.  I upgraded to Lightroom 6.  Now I do not have the ICC profile for the luster paper available under Color Management in LR6.  I downloaded and reinstalled the print driver but that didn't give me the profile.  All of the ICC profile downloads that I can find are for other vendors' papers.  The link in ssprengel's post takes me to the driver download page but it doesn't give me the Canon paper ICC profiles. Help.

  • Profile for Canon "Pro Premium Matte paper"

    I will receive a package of new Canon “Pro Premium Matte paper” to use with my Pro-100 on Friday. I see that “Print Studio Pro” has a profile for this paper; however, in Lightroom a profile does not exist. Where would I find this profile?
    Nikon D600; Nikkor 50mm f/1.8G, 85mm f/1.8G, 70-300mmG f/4.5 - 5.6 VR
    Solved!
    Go to Solution.

    Nevermind, found it.
    Nikon D600; Nikkor 50mm f/1.8G, 85mm f/1.8G, 70-300mmG f/4.5 - 5.6 VR

  • Lens Profile for Canon 16-35

    Using Canon Mark11 camera and Canon 16-35 lens.  I can not find a profile for it in Lightroom Lens Correction.  Any thoughts on where I can find a profile for this lens?
    Thanks,
    Matthew Kraus

    I also don't see the Canon 16-35 f2.8 II listed in the lens corrections popup list, using the Lightroom 4 Demo downloaded a week ago.  How can get this profile to show up?

  • Lens profile for Canon 28/1.8 - already installed in LR4?

    Hmm, the explanation of lens profiles and how to add them is a little confusing.
    When I look here in Adobe's own list of supported lenses, my new "Canon EF 28mm f/2.8 IS USM" is listed there:
    http://helpx.adobe.com/x-productkb/multi/lens-profile-support-lightroom-4.html
    Does that mean that profile should already be installed in LR 4? (I am running 4.4)
    The profile is not showing up in Lightroom for me. (I am shooting JPEG.)
    I downloaded the lens profile downloader, and found a profile for this lens, but is that the official Adobe profile for the lens? I installed it but it still doesn't work for me because it is for RAW only.
    Sorry for the newbie question.
    thanks in advance,
    Paul D.

    JPG lens profiles are distinct from RAW lens profiles because cameras can fix things with the camera-produced JPGs that the lens profiles also fix and you can get double-corrections by using a raw lens profile with a jpg, but it depends on the capabilities and settings of the particular camera.
    If you are sure your camera isn’t correcting geometric and vignetting issues with your JPGs, then you can hack the lens profile you downloaded to use it with JPGs, by editing the .lcp file with a text editor and change the flag indicating it is for raw files from True to False.  I forget what this flag is called, exactly, but it is obvious and near the top of the files.
    On Windows, the lens profiles are downloaded to:
    C:\Users\--username--\AppData\Roaming\Adobe\CameraRaw\LensProfiles\
    AppData is a hidden or system folder so you’ll need to unhide such folders in the folder options in Explorer or just type in the path an hit Enter in the address area of Explorer.

  • Lens Profile for Canon 500mm f/4?

    I seem to remember that there used to be a lens profile for the Canon 500mm f/4 lens in my older versions of Lightroom 3, but now when I use LR3.6, I see "none" listed when looking for a profile for this lens in the Develop module.  Is this a change in 3.6 or am I mistaken?  This probably is not a big deal because I don't remember seeing much change when turning on the profile correction before for this lens, but I am beginning to wonder if I was imagining something.... If the profile was dropped from the latest version, are there any independent profiles for this lens?  Can you remind me how to load a user developed profile?  Thanks.

    Most likely you saw it listed for a CR2 file, and now you're looking for it for JPEG. The raw versions are lots more numerous than the jpeg versions of the profiles.
    Hal

  • Lens profile for Canon PowerShot S120?

    Is there a lens profile for the Canon PowerShot S120?

    Powershsot S100 is available - minor difference in aperture specification but same zoom range - implying that the elements may be the same.  Could serve for your purposes and works well for my S100. 

  • Printer profile for Canon inkjet

    I am having a bit of trouble getting my printer to render colours satisfactorily.
    My printer is a Canon Pixma iP 3600 but I am not sure which settings give optimum results from Illustrator RGB files.
    1) Should I specify a colour profile for Illustrator or is Emulate Adobe Illustrator o.k.?
    2) Is there anything else I should do if I use Indesign for output?
    3) When I go to print, Color Management in the Print dialogue gives me various Printer Profile options, including:
    Does anyone know which of these Canon  iP3600 series profiles works (or is supposed to work) best? (I have had dismal results using Adobe RGB and can find nothing about profiles in the printer handbook. For example, I don’t know the difference between MP2, PR1, PR2 etc.)
    As for Rendering Intent, it is important in this case that colours reproduce as accurately as the printer will allow. My instinct tells me to use Absolute Colorimetric because I have adjusted the colours in my files very carefully.

    Steve,
    Have you tried a custom RGB test sheet (maybe with notes on settings written into it for each combination) and a waste of raw materials?

  • Accurate colour profile for Canon 40D?

    Hi all,
    I have an Canon 40D but unfortunately my colour checker is not compatible with the new DNG Profile Editor (it's a PerfectPix Natural).
    Has anyone here made a profile for the 40D using the Gretag colour checker that they'd be happy to share with me? I realise that your 40D may not replicate colours in exactly the same way as my camera, however it's got to be closer than any of my other profile options at the moment.
    Thanks in advance,
    James
    PS... I hope this request isn't inappopriate, the user to user forum for Camera Raw seemed like the best place.

    Hi David/Eric,
    I understand what you mean about the contrast, however I am comfortable that my images are exposed correctly on the whole. I guess it's just very hard to quantify, and very hard to prove, where my images are not "right" colour wise.
    I also realise that white balance plays a major role in this type of subjective comparison... The issue I'm finding is that when I am flicking between profiles for an image there are times I just can't find anything that's right.
    Maybe the biggest issue, at least in part, is perception. When analyzing an example image I've seen the following behaviour for each profile:
    - Camera Standard is probably best, but while on this example it's okay, in some images it's over-saturated.
    - Adobe Standard is close, probably slightly too green.
    - ACR 4.4 is up there too, best in some cases but can have issues with skin tones.
    - Camera Faithful is next on the list but tends to look flat and lifeless (even though no change other than profile).
    - Camera Portrait makes faces too pink and skies too blue. In general it seems to over-saturate.
    - Camera Landscape makes faces look pretty good, but skies and landscapes are WAY over saturated.
    - Camera Neutral looks relatively good colour wise but has no contrast and looks under saturated.
    The problem is, in this one example they've behaved in a certain way. In another example (even one where I've manually white balanced) they'll behave differently... suddenly Camera Standard will look terrible and ACR4.4 will look the best... or Adobe Standard.
    I guess the issue is I'm just not confident that LR is reproducing the colours that the camera saw... but only because I don't think the profile is right. Once I know that the profile is right (and whether I'm being silly or not, I would be satisfied that Joe Blog's 40D is going to be almost identical to my 40D) then I'll know that the faces look a little red because I've got my white balance wrong. Right now there are three that are "close" to what I saw, but I'm not confident that any of them are spot on.
    I hope this makes sense. I'm not attempting to be difficult, to be honest I figured that the creation of the Profile Editor would lead to a proliferation of downloadable camera profiles that were supposedly "colourmetrically accurate" for each camera... maybe I'm just a little quick on the bandwagon.
    Cheers,
    James
    PS. I realise that colour gamut of the monitor plays into this also, but I am assuming that if I can SEE that the colours are too saturated then I'm not exceeding the gamut... I guess it's possible that my "washed out" profile Camera Faithful is exceeding the gamut and subsequently doesn't look very good?

Maybe you are looking for