Program RPURMD00 to undo TP postings Performance Issues
Hello All,
We have created incorrect Third Party positng documents in PCP0. These have not been posted yet. When we try to run the simulation program to undo postings (RPURMD00), it took more than 22 hours and we finally had to cancel it and restart. Even the second time it exceeded time limit. Undo process should happen to delete about 150 entries in Table T51R5. So I was expecting not more than an hour or so.
Is there a SAP note released to resolve this? Or is there an alternative to undo the postings?
Appreciate any quick responses.
Thanks,
Soujanya.
Can anyone please help me with this URGENT Issue:
Can I just delete/ignore the incorrect third party posting documents?
I am trying to run a simulation with the correct posting date parameters (before deleting the Incorrect documents), the third party posting do not seem to pick up any Garnishment vendors we are trying to post. Is this because, we still have the production Incorrect documents generated and not deleted.
Similar Messages
-
Performance issues with Motion (position, scale, rotate) and GTX 590
I'm experiencing performance issues with my Premiere Pro CC when I scale, position or rotate a clip in the program monitor.
I have no performance issues with playback! It's only, when i move something with the mouse or by changing the x,y-values of Position in the Motion-Dialog in video effects.
Premiere then lags terribly and updates the program monitor only about once per second - this makes it very difficult and cumbersome to work and position things.
On a second Premiere installation on my laptop, performance is fine and fluid - allthough it doesn't have GPU support and is a much slower computer.
I'm pretty sure this has somehow to do with my graphic card, which is a Nvidia GTX 590.
I was told by the support, that it is actually a dual graphic card, which is not supported/liked by Premiere.
The thing is, until the latest Premiere update, I did not have performance issues at all with this card.
I also read on the forum that others with the GTX 590 did not experience any problems with it
So where does this come from?
There is no change in performance whether or not I activate Mercury Playback Engine GPU acceleration.
I also tried deactivating one of the 2 gpus, but there also was no change.
Does anyone else know this problem and has anyone a solution?
I'm running Premiere CC on a Win 7 64bit engine, Nvidia GTX 590, latest driver (of today),I am suffering from the same phenomenon since I updated just before christmas, I think.
I am hardly able to do scaling, rotating and translating in the program monitor itslef - whil motion has been highlighted in teh effect controls.
In the effect controls I can scale, rotate etc however.
Also I have noticed there is a yellow box with handles in teh program monitor. I remember it was white before.
I cannot figure out what to change in my preferences. What has happened?
best,
Hans Wessels
Premiere CC
Mac Pro OSX 10.7.5
16 GB 1066 MHz DD3
2 X NVIDIA GeForce GT 120 512 MB -
Performance Issue with PAY_BALANCE_VALUES_V View in Oracle R12
Dear all ,
We have recently upgraded from 11i(11.5.10.2) to R12(12.1.3). We are facing one Issue with slow performance of the queries where PAY_BALANCE_VALUES_V is used. We have so many reports & logic in Payroll which uses this View.
In 11i this works fine, however in R12 it takes very long time. There are no configuration changes we have done from 11i to R12.
Is there any way to optimize the performance or alternate way to retrieve the Balances Data in Payroll ?
Any heads up would be highly Appreciated.
Thanks,
RaziHi Razi,
The balance related performance issue is written in the following note.
Note:1494344.1 UK Payslip Generation - Self Service Program Takes Much Time To Complete (Performance Issue)
This issue was fixed in HR_PF.B RUP6 or patch:14376786. Did you apply this patch? If not, I suggest you apply it.
Also, HR_PF.B RUP6 has some balance related performance issues.
If you already have applied HR_PF.B RUP6, I suggest you log a SR with SQL trace.
Thanks,
Hideki -
Concurrent program performance Issue
Hi,
We are currently experiencing performance issue in one of the concurrent program related
to the HR module. The concurrent request is currently completing in 3 hrs time.
We have obtained a trace for the concurrent program.
Please help me analyze the cause of the performance issue from the trace file.
Trace file below:
BEGIN SLC_PYINF_USMONACCROH_PKG.SLC_421_HANDLE_OUTBOUND(:errbuf,:rc,:A0,:A1,
:A2,:A3,:A4,:A5,:A6,:A7,:A8,:A9,:A10,:A11); END;
call count cpu elapsed disk query current rows
Parse 1 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
Execute 1 76.08 9602.16 700828 1330818 663813 1
Fetch 0 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
total 2 76.08 9602.16 700828 1330818 663813 1
Misses in library cache during parse: 0
Optimizer mode: ALL_ROWS
Parsing user id: 70
Elapsed times include waiting on following events:
Event waited on Times Max. Wait Total Waited
---------------------------------------- Waited ---------- ------------
SQL*Net message to client 3 0.00 0.00
SQL*Net message from client 3 0.00 0.00
PL/SQL lock timer 969 9.83 9485.16
UPDATE HRAPPS.SLC_PYINF_USMONACCRO_STG SET PROCESS_STATUS = 2
WHERE
CONC_REQUEST_ID = :B2 AND SET_SEQUENCE_NUM = :B1 AND PROCESS_STATUS = 1
call count cpu elapsed disk query current rows
Parse 1 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
Execute 1 24.83 45.67 145127 695479 602714 560730
Fetch 0 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
total 2 24.83 45.67 145127 695479 602714 560730
Misses in library cache during parse: 0
Optimizer mode: ALL_ROWS
Parsing user id: 70 (recursive depth: 1)
Rows Row Source Operation
0 UPDATE SLC_PYINF_USMONACCRO_STG (cr=684898 pr=134556 pw=0 time=44759708 us)
1135266 TABLE ACCESS FULL SLC_PYINF_USMONACCRO_STG (cr=694708 pr=124937 pw=0 time=6874212 us)
Elapsed times include waiting on following events:
Event waited on Times Max. Wait Total Waited
---------------------------------------- Waited ---------- ------------
db file scattered read 15622 1.43 13.94
db file sequential read 25578 0.52 14.30
latch: cache buffers lru chain 3 0.00 0.00
DELETE FROM SLC_PYINF_USMONACCRO_ARC
WHERE
EXTRACT_DATE<TRUNC(SYSDATE)-60
call count cpu elapsed disk query current rows
Parse 1 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
Execute 1 7.41 15.05 87598 87668 0 0
Fetch 0 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
total 2 7.41 15.06 87598 87668 0 0
Misses in library cache during parse: 1
Optimizer mode: ALL_ROWS
Parsing user id: 70 (recursive depth: 1)
Rows Row Source Operation
0 DELETE SLC_PYINF_USMONACCRO_ARC (cr=87668 pr=87598 pw=0 time=15053606 us)
0 TABLE ACCESS FULL SLC_PYINF_USMONACCRO_ARC (cr=87668 pr=87598 pw=0 time=15053595 us)
Elapsed times include waiting on following events:
Event waited on Times Max. Wait Total Waited
---------------------------------------- Waited ---------- ------------
db file sequential read 3 0.00 0.00
db file scattered read 11025 0.61 13.21
SELECT COUNT(*)
FROM
HRAPPS.SLC_PYINF_USMONACCRO_STG WHERE CONC_REQUEST_ID = :B1
call count cpu elapsed disk query current rows
Parse 2 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
Execute 2 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
Fetch 2 10.14 10.23 116633 123540 0 2
total 6 10.14 10.23 116633 123540 0 2
Misses in library cache during parse: 0
Optimizer mode: ALL_ROWS
Parsing user id: 70 (recursive depth: 1)
Rows Row Source Operation
1 SORT AGGREGATE (cr=61770 pr=58317 pw=0 time=5290475 us)
560730 TABLE ACCESS FULL SLC_PYINF_USMONACCRO_STG (cr=61770 pr=58317 pw=0 time=1689204 us)
Elapsed times include waiting on following events:
Event waited on Times Max. Wait Total Waited
---------------------------------------- Waited ---------- ------------
db file scattered read 15646 0.27 6.24
db file sequential read 625 0.00 0.01
SELECT COUNT(*)
FROM
HRAPPS.SLC_PYINF_USMONACCRO_STG WHERE CONC_REQUEST_ID = :B1 AND
PROCESS_STATUS = 2
call count cpu elapsed disk query current rows
Parse 1 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
Execute 1 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
Fetch 1 5.20 8.32 51482 69842 0 1
total 3 5.20 8.32 51482 69842 0 1
Misses in library cache during parse: 0
Optimizer mode: ALL_ROWS
Parsing user id: 70 (recursive depth: 1)
Rows Row Source Operation
1 SORT AGGREGATE (cr=69842 pr=51482 pw=0 time=8323369 us)
560730 TABLE ACCESS FULL SLC_PYINF_USMONACCRO_STG (cr=69842 pr=51482 pw=0 time=2811304 us)
Elapsed times include waiting on following events:
Event waited on Times Max. Wait Total Waited
---------------------------------------- Waited ---------- ------------
db file scattered read 6514 0.30 6.09
db file sequential read 114 0.00 0.02
SELECT MAX(SET_SEQUENCE_NUM)
FROM
HRAPPS.SLC_PYINF_USMONACCRO_STG WHERE CONC_REQUEST_ID = :B1
call count cpu elapsed disk query current rows
Parse 1 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
Execute 1 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
Fetch 1 5.34 6.63 58318 61770 0 1
total 3 5.34 6.63 58318 61770 0 1
Misses in library cache during parse: 0
Optimizer mode: ALL_ROWS
Parsing user id: 70 (recursive depth: 1)
Rows Row Source Operation
1 SORT AGGREGATE (cr=61770 pr=58318 pw=0 time=6639527 us)
560730 TABLE ACCESS FULL SLC_PYINF_USMONACCRO_STG (cr=61770 pr=58318 pw=0 time=2250410 us)
Elapsed times include waiting on following events:
Event waited on Times Max. Wait Total Waited
---------------------------------------- Waited ---------- ------------
db file scattered read 7820 0.30 4.46
db file sequential read 313 0.00 0.05
SELECT COUNT(*)
FROM
HRAPPS.SLC_PYINF_USMONACCRO_STG WHERE CONC_REQUEST_ID = :B2 AND
SET_SEQUENCE_NUM = :B1 AND PROCESS_STATUS = 1
call count cpu elapsed disk query current rows
Parse 1 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
Execute 1 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
Fetch 1 4.99 4.88 58315 61770 0 1
total 3 4.99 4.88 58315 61770 0 1
Misses in library cache during parse: 0
Optimizer mode: ALL_ROWS
Parsing user id: 70 (recursive depth: 1)
Rows Row Source Operation
1 SORT AGGREGATE (cr=61770 pr=58315 pw=0 time=4887337 us)
560730 TABLE ACCESS FULL SLC_PYINF_USMONACCRO_STG (cr=61770 pr=58315 pw=0 time=1688451 us)
Elapsed times include waiting on following events:
Event waited on Times Max. Wait Total Waited
---------------------------------------- Waited ---------- ------------
db file scattered read 7824 0.00 3.02
db file sequential read 313 0.00 0.00
SELECT COUNT(*)
FROM
HRAPPS.SLC_PYINF_USMONACCRO_STG WHERE CONC_REQUEST_ID = :B1 AND
PROCESS_STATUS = 1
call count cpu elapsed disk query current rows
Parse 1 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
Execute 1 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
Fetch 1 4.98 4.87 58318 61770 0 1
total 3 4.98 4.87 58318 61770 0 1
Misses in library cache during parse: 0
Optimizer mode: ALL_ROWS
Parsing user id: 70 (recursive depth: 1)
Rows Row Source Operation
1 SORT AGGREGATE (cr=61770 pr=58318 pw=0 time=4872548 us)
560730 TABLE ACCESS FULL SLC_PYINF_USMONACCRO_STG (cr=61770 pr=58318 pw=0 time=1688407 us)
Elapsed times include waiting on following events:
Event waited on Times Max. Wait Total Waited
---------------------------------------- Waited ---------- ------------
db file scattered read 7821 0.00 2.98
db file sequential read 312 0.00 0.00
SELECT COUNT(*)
FROM
HRAPPS.SLC_PYINF_USMONACCRO_STG WHERE CONC_REQUEST_ID = :B1 AND
PROCESS_STATUS = -1
call count cpu elapsed disk query current rows
Parse 1 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
Execute 1 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
Fetch 1 4.45 4.36 58317 61770 0 1
total 3 4.45 4.36 58317 61770 0 1
Misses in library cache during parse: 0
Optimizer mode: ALL_ROWS
Parsing user id: 70 (recursive depth: 1)
Rows Row Source Operation
1 SORT AGGREGATE (cr=61770 pr=58317 pw=0 time=4369473 us)
0 TABLE ACCESS FULL SLC_PYINF_USMONACCRO_STG (cr=61770 pr=58317 pw=0 time=4369425 us)
Elapsed times include waiting on following events:
Event waited on Times Max. Wait Total Waited
---------------------------------------- Waited ---------- ------------
db file scattered read 7823 0.00 2.98
db file sequential read 312 0.00 0.00
SELECT COUNT(*)
FROM
HRAPPS.SLC_PYINF_USMONACCRO_STG WHERE CONC_REQUEST_ID = :B1 AND
PROCESS_STATUS < 0
call count cpu elapsed disk query current rows
Parse 1 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
Execute 1 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
Fetch 1 4.14 4.24 51481 61770 0 1
total 3 4.14 4.24 51481 61770 0 1
Misses in library cache during parse: 0
Optimizer mode: ALL_ROWS
Parsing user id: 70 (recursive depth: 1)
Rows Row Source Operation
1 SORT AGGREGATE (cr=61770 pr=51481 pw=0 time=4243020 us)
0 TABLE ACCESS FULL SLC_PYINF_USMONACCRO_STG (cr=61770 pr=51481 pw=0 time=4242968 us)
Elapsed times include waiting on following events:
Event waited on Times Max. Wait Total Waited
---------------------------------------- Waited ---------- ------------
db file scattered read 6537 0.06 2.90
db file sequential read 104 0.00 0.00
DELETE FROM SLC_PYINF_USMONACCRO_GLI_ARC
WHERE
EXTRACT_DATE<TRUNC(SYSDATE)-60
call count cpu elapsed disk query current rows
Parse 1 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
Execute 1 0.63 2.52 7681 7689 0 0
Fetch 0 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
total 2 0.63 2.52 7681 7689 0 0
Misses in library cache during parse: 0
Optimizer mode: ALL_ROWS
Parsing user id: 70 (recursive depth: 1)
Rows Row Source Operation
0 DELETE SLC_PYINF_USMONACCRO_GLI_ARC (cr=7689 pr=7681 pw=0 time=2521592 us)
0 TABLE ACCESS FULL SLC_PYINF_USMONACCRO_GLI_ARC (cr=7689 pr=7681 pw=0 time=2521583 us)
Elapsed times include waiting on following events:
Event waited on Times Max. Wait Total Waited
---------------------------------------- Waited ---------- ------------
db file sequential read 1 0.00 0.00
db file scattered read 976 1.00 2.36
UPDATE HRAPPS.SLC_PYINF_USMONACCRO_GLI_STG SET PROCESS_STATUS = 2
WHERE
CONC_REQUEST_ID = :B1 AND PROCESS_STATUS = 1
call count cpu elapsed disk query current rows
Parse 1 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
Execute 1 1.89 2.25 5863 16125 60963 52309
Fetch 0 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
total 2 1.89 2.25 5863 16125 60963 52309
Misses in library cache during parse: 0
Optimizer mode: ALL_ROWS
Parsing user id: 70 (recursive depth: 1)
Rows Row Source Operation
0 UPDATE SLC_PYINF_USMONACCRO_GLI_STG (cr=11787 pr=1273 pw=0 time=1332023 us)
122679 TABLE ACCESS FULL SLC_PYINF_USMONACCRO_GLI_STG (cr=16291 pr=5859 pw=0 time=48501241 us)
Elapsed times include waiting on following events:
Event waited on Times Max. Wait Total Waited
---------------------------------------- Waited ---------- ------------
db file scattered read 745 0.01 0.76
db file parallel read 1 0.00 0.00
db file sequential read 5 0.00 0.00
SELECT B.ATTRIBUTE1 ,B.ATTRIBUTE2 ,B.ATTRIBUTE3 ,T.FLEX_VALUE_MEANING ,
T.DESCRIPTION
FROM
FND_FLEX_VALUES_TL T ,FND_FLEX_VALUES B WHERE B.FLEX_VALUE_ID =
T.FLEX_VALUE_ID AND T.LANGUAGE = USERENV ('LANG') AND TRIM(UPPER
(B.FLEX_VALUE)) = TRIM(UPPER (:B1 )) AND B.ENABLED_FLAG = 'Y' AND UPPER
(B.VALUE_CATEGORY) = UPPER ('SLCHR_INTERFACE_CLEANUP')
call count cpu elapsed disk query current rows
Parse 1 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
Execute 2 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
Fetch 2 0.25 0.86 1640 3286 0 2
total 5 0.25 0.86 1640 3286 0 2
Misses in library cache during parse: 0
Optimizer mode: ALL_ROWS
Parsing user id: 70 (recursive depth: 1)
Rows Row Source Operation
2 NESTED LOOPS (cr=3286 pr=1640 pw=0 time=866461 us)
2 TABLE ACCESS FULL FND_FLEX_VALUES (cr=3280 pr=1637 pw=0 time=848331 us)
2 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID FND_FLEX_VALUES_TL (cr=6 pr=3 pw=0 time=18101 us)
2 INDEX UNIQUE SCAN FND_FLEX_VALUES_TL_U1 (cr=4 pr=2 pw=0 time=9705 us)(object id 849241)
Elapsed times include waiting on following events:
Event waited on Times Max. Wait Total Waited
---------------------------------------- Waited ---------- ------------
db file sequential read 4 0.00 0.02
db file scattered read 208 0.30 0.71
SELECT PHASE_CODE, STATUS_CODE, COMPLETION_TEXT, PHASE.LOOKUP_CODE,
STATUS.LOOKUP_CODE, PHASE.MEANING, STATUS.MEANING
FROM
FND_CONCURRENT_REQUESTS R, FND_CONCURRENT_PROGRAMS P, FND_LOOKUPS PHASE,
FND_LOOKUPS STATUS WHERE PHASE.LOOKUP_TYPE = :B3 AND PHASE.LOOKUP_CODE =
DECODE(STATUS.LOOKUP_CODE, 'H', 'I', 'S', 'I', 'U', 'I', 'M', 'I',
R.PHASE_CODE) AND STATUS.LOOKUP_TYPE = :B2 AND STATUS.LOOKUP_CODE =
DECODE(R.PHASE_CODE, 'P', DECODE(R.HOLD_FLAG, 'Y', 'H',
DECODE(P.ENABLED_FLAG, 'N', 'U', DECODE(SIGN(R.REQUESTED_START_DATE -
SYSDATE),1,'P', R.STATUS_CODE))), 'R', DECODE(R.HOLD_FLAG, 'Y', 'S',
DECODE(R.STATUS_CODE, 'Q', 'B', 'I', 'B', R.STATUS_CODE)), R.STATUS_CODE)
AND (R.CONCURRENT_PROGRAM_ID = P.CONCURRENT_PROGRAM_ID AND
R.PROGRAM_APPLICATION_ID= P.APPLICATION_ID ) AND REQUEST_ID = :B1
call count cpu elapsed disk query current rows
Parse 1 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
Execute 971 0.25 0.16 0 0 0 0
Fetch 971 0.53 0.65 0 13605 0 971
total 1943 0.78 0.81 0 13605 0 971
Misses in library cache during parse: 0
Optimizer mode: ALL_ROWS
Parsing user id: 70 (recursive depth: 1)
Rows Row Source Operation
971 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID FND_LOOKUP_VALUES (cr=17489 pr=0 pw=0 time=877481 us)
2913 NESTED LOOPS (cr=16518 pr=0 pw=0 time=1643550 us)
971 NESTED LOOPS (cr=11663 pr=0 pw=0 time=658551 us)
971 NESTED LOOPS (cr=5837 pr=0 pw=0 time=95374 us)
971 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID FND_CONCURRENT_REQUESTS (cr=2924 pr=0 pw=0 time=63054 us)
971 INDEX UNIQUE SCAN FND_CONCURRENT_REQUESTS_U1 (cr=1953 pr=0 pw=0 time=43874 us)(object id 240792)
971 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID FND_CONCURRENT_PROGRAMS (cr=2913 pr=0 pw=0 time=28198 us)
971 INDEX UNIQUE SCAN FND_CONCURRENT_PROGRAMS_U1 (cr=1942 pr=0 pw=0 time=17956 us)(object id 849182)
971 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID FND_LOOKUP_VALUES (cr=5826 pr=0 pw=0 time=558105 us)
971 INDEX RANGE SCAN FND_LOOKUP_VALUES_U1 (cr=4855 pr=0 pw=0 time=539171 us)(object id 906518)
971 INDEX RANGE SCAN FND_LOOKUP_VALUES_U1 (cr=4855 pr=0 pw=0 time=172115 us)(object id 906518)
SELECT MAX(LT.SECURITY_GROUP_ID)
FROM
FND_LOOKUP_TYPES LT WHERE LT.VIEW_APPLICATION_ID = :B2 AND LT.LOOKUP_TYPE =
:B1 AND LT.SECURITY_GROUP_ID IN (0,
TO_NUMBER(DECODE(SUBSTRB(USERENV('CLIENT_INFO'),55,1), ' ', '0', NULL, '0',
SUBSTRB(USERENV('CLIENT_INFO'),55,10))))
call count cpu elapsed disk query current rows
Parse 1 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
Execute 1945 0.11 0.11 0 0 0 0
Fetch 1945 0.18 0.10 0 3890 0 1945
total 3891 0.29 0.21 0 3890 0 1945
Misses in library cache during parse: 0
Optimizer mode: ALL_ROWS
Parsing user id: 70 (recursive depth: 1)
Rows Row Source Operation
1945 SORT AGGREGATE (cr=3890 pr=0 pw=0 time=142954 us)
1945 FIRST ROW (cr=3890 pr=0 pw=0 time=96520 us)
1945 INDEX RANGE SCAN (MIN/MAX) FND_LOOKUP_TYPES_U1 (cr=3890 pr=0 pw=0 time=89938 us)(object id 906517)
INSERT INTO HRAPPS.SLC_HRINF_INT_SUMMARY (INT_SUMMARY_ID,
INT_SUMMARY_CREATE_DATE ,INT_SUMMARY_LAST_UPDATE_DATE, INTERFACE_NAME ,
HANDLER_CONC_REQUEST_ID, INT_CONC_REQUEST_ID ,SET_SEQUENCE_NUMBER,
SET_RECORD_COUNT, INT_FROM_DATE ,INT_TO_DATE, INT_STATUS_1_STATE,
INT_STATUS_1_MESSAGE ,INT_STATUS_1_STARTED, INT_STATUS_1_COMPLETED ,
INT_STATUS_1_SUCCESS_COUNT, INT_STATUS_1_ERROR_COUNT ,INT_STATUS_2_STATE,
INT_STATUS_2_MESSAGE ,INT_STATUS_2_STARTED, INT_STATUS_2_COMPLETED ,
INT_STATUS_2_SUCCESS_COUNT, INT_STATUS_2_ERROR_COUNT ,INT_STATUS_3_STATE,
INT_STATUS_3_MESSAGE ,INT_STATUS_3_STARTED, INT_STATUS_3_COMPLETED ,
INT_STATUS_3_SUCCESS_COUNT, INT_STATUS_3_ERROR_COUNT ,INT_STATUS_4_STATE,
INT_STATUS_4_MESSAGE ,INT_STATUS_4_STARTED, INT_STATUS_4_COMPLETED ,
INT_STATUS_4_SUCCESS_COUNT, INT_STATUS_4_ERROR_COUNT ,INT_STATUS_5_STATE,
INT_STATUS_5_MESSAGE ,INT_STATUS_5_STARTED, INT_STATUS_5_COMPLETED ,
INT_STATUS_5_SUCCESS_COUNT, INT_STATUS_5_ERROR_COUNT )
VALUES
(:B7 , :B6 , :B6 , :B5 , :B4 , NULL , NULL, NULL, :B3 , :B2 , :B1 , NULL ,
NULL, NULL , NULL, NULL , :B1 , NULL , NULL, NULL , NULL, NULL , :B1 , NULL
, NULL, NULL , NULL, NULL , :B1 , NULL , NULL, NULL , NULL, NULL , :B1 ,
NULL , NULL, NULL , NULL, NULL )
call count cpu elapsed disk query current rows
Parse 1 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
Execute 1 0.01 0.12 12 1 12 1
Fetch 0 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
total 2 0.01 0.12 12 1 12 1
Misses in library cache during parse: 0
Optimizer mode: ALL_ROWS
Parsing user id: 70 (recursive depth: 1)
Elapsed times include waiting on following events:
Event waited on Times Max. Wait Total Waited
---------------------------------------- Waited ---------- ------------
db file sequential read 12 0.02 0.12
Thanks & Regards,
RupHi;
Please check our previous topic
Concurrent manager real time tune
Oracle apps database
tune concurrent manager
Oracle apps database
Concurrent Manager very slow
Concurrent Manager very slow........
Regard
Helios -
Performance issues using multiple CC design programs?
Hey! I'm Gwidz, and I'm having some performance issues with my adobe programs. I primarily use Photoshop, InDesign and Illustrator for design work. I find that when I have any two of them open, I experience delays in clicking and dragging using my pen tablet, and laggy zooming in/scrolling. This issue disappears when I only have one program open.
I just bought this laptop to use these programs. Here's the specs:
Operating system: Windows 8 64 bit
Processor: 4th gen intel i7 4700HQ
Ram: 16gb DDR3
Graphics: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770M 3GB GDDR5
Cost me 2000 bucks on amazon, and I'm pretty disappointed in how things are going right now. I definitely don't think it could be a hardware issue, could it?
I'm using an SSD as my scratch disc, and using the 64 bit versions of all programs that have it. Nothing else running in the background except these programs, and yet still I experience poor performance.
Admitedly, I'm new to windows 8, and I'm learning everything that I can about it in hopes of resolving this issue.
If anyone has any advice, any and all is greatly aprpeciated!I'm seeing this exact same choppiness and VERY slow response times with the same low use of CPU and memory... WITH JUST ONE APP OPEN! Illustrator.
Macbook Retina Pro, 15 inch.
I've tried with the GPU forced off, and forced on, and on autoswitching.
I've tried clean reinstalls. And reboots. Etc.
This is not hardware related. It's something utterly flawed with the way Illustrator (and InDesign) draw do things. They are just grotesquely inefficient.
The fact that the program/app makes no effort to use more CPU/GPU to speed up responsiveness to the user input is the real indicator of how poorly optimised this code is.
After Effects is better. But it's adaptive degradation STUTTERS grotesquely, and it's actually better to try to turn that off. Although I'm having a hard time trying to figure out how to turn that off at the moment.. forgotten where I previously found that switch.
Photoshop is also better.
I'm also talking about small files. Nothing in them. Just start drawing... Stutters... atrocious frame rates for the update of the screen and very poor response rates to input.
This is 64 bit optimised? I don't think so. -
Performance issue in customized program
Hi,
We have a performance issue in customized program.
In this program he used do-enddo twice. I mean nested do-endo.
How can we increase the performance.
And when we did the code inspector it displays 9 errors 'Char. strings w/o text elements will not be translated'.
Is there any performance issue for this error?
Regards,
Chandu.> 'Char. strings w/o text elements will not be translated'.
> Is there any performance issue for this error?
No, this is just not so clean programming. As for the rest, Please Read before Posting in the Performance and Tuning Forum and learn how to find out where the showstoppers really are.
Thomas -
Performance issue in customized program with do-enddo
Hi,
We have a performance issue in customized program.
In this program he used do-enddo twice. I mean nested do-endo.
How can we increase the performance.
And when we did the code inspector it displays 9 errors 'Char. strings w/o text elements will not be translated'.
Is there any performance issue for this error?
Regards,
Chandu.
Moderator message - Cross post locked
Edited by: Rob Burbank on Oct 20, 2009 12:42 PM> 'Char. strings w/o text elements will not be translated'.
> Is there any performance issue for this error?
No, this is just not so clean programming. As for the rest, Please Read before Posting in the Performance and Tuning Forum and learn how to find out where the showstoppers really are.
Thomas -
Brand new with performance issues -- programs not responding, system hanging
Just this morning I began migrating from a Dell Inspiron 1525 laptop that has been generally reliable for the better part of 3 years (monitor housing is literally falling apart but still works great... check E-Bay later for spare parts! lol)... migrating to a Toshiba Satellite C655D-S5136 laptop running Windows 7 64-bit. It's literally right out of the box 5 hours ago and I've been reinstalling programs, transferring files, etc.
The problem is that I'm already noticing a lot of performance issues. The system (and/or programs) seem to get caught often... resulting in frequent "Program not responding" messages (some of which the system manages to bypass)... and a few of the "This program closed unexpectedly" or "This program stopping responding... do you want to check online for a solution or just close the program?" messages.
This is happening on multiple programs... tax prep software TaxAct update dialog hangs after 256 bytes downloaded every time, AVG Anti-Virus was hanging although never gave me a not responding message, Internet Explorer has stopped responding a couple times, Windows Live Mail did often, especially when I was using IMAP (since changed to POP3 and problem seems to have resolved but still). Even opening the start menu a few seconds after plugging in an external hard drive lagged the system like hell for a full two minutes until it caught up with itself.
This is unacceptable in a brand new machine. I was getting a few errors like this on my Dell every now and then but I chalked it up to an old machine that had never been wiped and had a failing hard disk. I understand the computer moving slower, especially as I've been installing a lot, running antivirus, downloading all at once, but no way programs should simply stop responding this often. I could do twice the activity on my Dell and have no issues.
I've uninstalled several of the preloaded programs... the antivirus, quickbooks, etc. I've also disabled and/or uninstalled several of the other programs like Toshiba Reeltime and Toshiba Zoom Manager or whatever that was. Nothing has seemed to help. And that's not surprising... the speed is great, it's that programs are getting caught so often, sometimes every time or every other time I open up a program.
Is this a Windows 7 thing? (This is first time using Windows 7, coming from Vista). Is it a Satellite thing?
Anyone have any suggestions? Is it possible there's just some component that's bad? Processor, RAM, etc.?
Thanks... very frustrated!I may have found a solution. I changed my startup programs and stopped some of the Toshiba software from running at startup. The ones I stopped are listed below. I have used the laptop heavily for two days now and have not had any problems. It actually runs very fast. I hope this will help.
Toshiba Reel Time
Toshiba Sleep
Toshiba PC Health Monitor
Toshiba WebCamera App.
Toshiba Power Saver
Toshiba Message Center
Toshiba Service Station
SmartFaceVWatcher
Toshiba Online Backup
Toshiba Zooming Utility
Toshiba eco Utility
Toshiba App Place
Message Center
For people that don't know how to change these, here are the instructions.
Click Start > Type msconfig in the search box > open msconfig > click on the startup tab > remove the checkmarks next to the above programs > restart computer.
Doing this may not fix your problems, but it did fix mine. -
Performance Issue with Concurrent Program
Hi Gurus,
I have a loader program which updates some information in the OM sales orders, this is been done using oe_order_pub.process_order and I do not see any performance issue in the package.
Using this program i had tried to update some huge number of orders uand it gets completed in few minutes, but at times this program runs for more than 6-7 hours even with
Pls could anyone advise what could be the issue with this?
Thanks & Regards,
GenooI have a loader program which updates some information in the OM sales orders, this is been done using oe_order_pub.process_order and I do not see any performance issue in the package.
Using this program i had tried to update some huge number of orders uand it gets completed in few minutes, but at times this program runs for more than 6-7 hours even with
Pls could anyone advise what could be the issue with this?Do you have the statistics collected up to date?
Can you find any errors in the database log file?
Any locks in the database?
Any invalid objects?
Please enable trace and generate the TKPROF file once the program is completed.
Thanks,
Hussein -
Performance Issue in Program /VIRSA/ZVRAT_U03
Hi,
The Program /VIRSA/ZVRAT_U03(eport the user SOD voilations and the correspocnding user access) is giving performance issue ,
Ideally it gives Time out error after some time.
As this program is a Standard program from : VIRSA SYSTEMS INC., and there are no available OSS notes available.
I would like to know , how to proceed in this screnario.
Thanks is Advance.
Cheers
IrfanHi Irfan,
run the program in background mode to avoid the timeout.
If the runtime is not acceptable open a message with details: (runtime, variant, objects processed, ...).
Kind regards,
Hermann -
Performance Issue on "Planning Manager" program
Hi,
In order management --- the "Planning Manager" request is taking lot of time to run when we create 100,000 lines of sales orders at a time( I mean,this causes the planning manager to run slower). Can you please help me out how can i increase the planning manager request to run fast(performance)?.
Thanks In Advance,
BaluDuplicate post:
Performance issue on AFPO
Performance issue on AFPO -
Hardware Configuration:
Regarding Oracle Performance Issue.
Configuration 1
================
SunV880 - Sunfire
32 GB RAM
14 numbers of 36GB hard disk
8 CPUs
CPU Speed 750MZ.
Software Configuration:
Oracle 8i
OS version - Solaris 8
Customized our own application - Namex
Configuration 2
================
Intel PIII - 750 MZ
2 GB RAM
2 CPUS
Software configuration
Oracle 8i
OS version linux 6.2
Customized our own application - Namex (multi threaded application)
We installed the oracle application in all hard disks. All tables
are splited in to separate hard disks.
OS installed in 1 hard disk.
namex application installed in 1 hard disk
Oracle installed in 1 hard disk.
All tables are splited in to other hard disks.
We are trying to insert some user databases in oracle table. We
achieved up to 150 records/second in Sun server. But in lower
configuration our application inserts up to 100 records/second.
(configuration 2)
We want improve our inserting database records/per rate
in Sun Server.
How to tune our oracle application parameter values in init.ora
file. Our application tries to insert up to 500 records per second.
But I can't able to achieve this value.
init.ora file
=============
db_name = "namex"
instance_name = namex64
service_names = namex64
control_files = ("/disk1/oracle64/OraHome1/oradata/Namex64/control01.ctl", "/disk1/oracle64/OraHome1/oradata/namex64/control02.ctl", "/disk1/oracle64/OraHome1/oradata/namex64/control03.ctl")
open_cursors = 300
max_enabled_roles = 145
#db_block_buffers = 20480
db_block_buffers = 604800
#shared_pool_size = 419430400
shared_pool_size = 8000000000
#log_buffer = 163840000
log_buffer = 2147467264
#large_pool_size = 614400
java_pool_size = 0
log_checkpoint_interval = 10000
log_checkpoint_timeout = 1800
processes = 1014
# audit_trail = false # if you want auditing
# timed_statistics = false # if you want timed statistics
timed_statistics = true # if you want timed statistics
# max_dump_file_size = 10000 # limit trace file size to 5M each
# Uncommenting the lines below will cause automatic archiving if archiving has
# been enabled using ALTER DATABASE ARCHIVELOG.
# log_archive_start = true
# log_archive_dest_1 = "location=/disk1/oracle64/OraHome1/admin/namex64/arch"
# log_archive_format = arch_%t_%s.arc
#DBCA uses the default database value (30) for max_rollback_segments
#100 rollback segments (or more) may be required in the future
#Uncomment the following entry when additional rollback segments are created and made online
#max_rollback_segments = 500
# If using private rollback segments, place lines of the following
# form in each of your instance-specific init.ora files:
#rollback_segments = ( RBS0, RBS1, RBS2, RBS3, RBS4, RBS5, RBS6, RBS7, RBS8, RBS9, RBS10, RBS11, RBS12, RBS13, RBS14, RBS15, RBS16, RBS17, RBS18, RBS19, RBS20, RBS21, RBS22, RBS23, RBS24, RBS25, RBS26, RBS27, RBS28 )
# Global Naming -- enforce that a dblink has same name as the db it connects to
# global_names = false
# Uncomment the following line if you wish to enable the Oracle Trace product
# to trace server activity. This enables scheduling of server collections
# from the Oracle Enterprise Manager Console.
# Also, if the oracle_trace_collection_name parameter is non-null,
# every session will write to the named collection, as well as enabling you
# to schedule future collections from the console.
# oracle_trace_enable = true
# define directories to store trace and alert files
background_dump_dest = /disk1/oracle64/OraHome1/admin/Namex64/bdump
core_dump_dest = /disk1/oracle64/OraHome1/admin/Namex64/cdump
#Uncomment this parameter to enable resource management for your database.
#The SYSTEM_PLAN is provided by default with the database.
#Change the plan name if you have created your own resource plan.# resource_manager_plan = system_plan
user_dump_dest = /disk1/oracle64/OraHome1/admin/Namex64/udump
db_block_size = 16384
remote_login_passwordfile = exclusive
os_authent_prefix = ""
compatible = "8.0.5"
#sort_area_size = 65536
sort_area_size = 1024000000
sort_area_retained_size = 65536
DB_WRITER_PROCESSES=4
How to improve my performance activities on Oracle server.
Please guide me regarding this issue.
If anyone wants more info, please let me know.
Best regards,
SenthilkumarAre you sure that it is not an application constraint ? i.e. the application can't handle so much data per second ? (application locks, threads )
Have you tried to write a simple test program, which inserts predefined data (which your application inserts) the same data, only changing keys ?
Then comparing the values from the 1st and the 2nd configuration ?
Did you check the way your application is communicating with oracle ? If it is TCP/ip (even on the local machine) then this is your main problem.
And one more thing, do you know if your application is able to run the load (inserts) of data on different threads (i.e. in parallel), because if is not, you won't be able to push the speed higher because your constraint is the speed of a single CPU. Consider running several process, which loads the data.
We had the same problem ot AIX machines with 4 cpus. Monitoring the machine, we found that only 25% (1 cpu) where in use. We had to run 4 processes to push the speed up. Check your system's overal load while running the 'load' (inserts).
log_checkpoint_interval = 10000
Check if this value is appropriate. Maybe you should set it to 0 (infinite). This will disable checkpoints on a 'number of undo record' basis. Checpoints will occure only on log switch.
How much redo files per redo groups do you have ? What is their size ? Are they on different disks ? How much redo data is generated by a single 'record' inserted ?
Hope i helped at least a little. -
Performance issues involving tables S031 and S032
Hello gurus,
I am having some performance issues. The program involves accessing data from S031 and S032. I have pasted the SELECT statements below. I have read through the forums for past postings regarding performance, but I wanted to know if there is anything that stands out as being the culprit of very poor performance, and how it can be corrected. I am fairly new to SAP, so I apologize if I've missed an obvious error. From debugging the program, it seems the 2nd select statement is taking a very long time to process.
GT_S032: approx. 40,000 entries
S031: approx. 90,000 entries
MSEG: approx. 115,000 entries
MKPF: approx. 100,000 entries
MARA: approx. 90,000 entries
SELECT
vrsio "Version
werks "Plan
lgort "Storage Location
matnr "Material
ssour "Statistic(s) origin
FROM s032
INTO TABLE gt_s032
WHERE ssour = space AND vrsio = c_000 AND werks = gw_werks.
IF sy-subrc = 0.
SELECT
vrsio "Version
werks "Plant
spmon "Period to analyze - month
matnr "Material
lgort "Storage Location
wzubb "Valuated stock receipts value
wagbb "Value of valuated stock being issued
FROM s031
INTO TABLE gt_s031
FOR ALL ENTRIES IN gt_s032
WHERE ssour = gt_s032-ssour
AND vrsio = gt_s032-vrsio
AND spmon IN r_spmon
AND sptag = '00000000'
AND spwoc = '000000'
AND spbup = '000000'
AND werks = gt_s032-werks
AND matnr = gt_s032-matnr
AND lgort = gt_s032-lgort
AND ( wzubb <> 0 OR wagbb <> 0 ).
ELSE.
WRITE: 'No data selected'(m01).
EXIT.
ENDIF.
SORT gt_s032 BY vrsio werks lgort matnr.
SORT gt_s031 BY vrsio werks spmon matnr lgort.
SELECT
p~werks "Plant
p~matnr "Material
p~mblnr "Document Number
p~mjahr "Document Year
p~bwart "Movement type
p~dmbtr "Amount in local currency
t~shkzg "Debit/Credit indicator
INTO TABLE gt_scrap
FROM mkpf AS h
INNER JOIN mseg AS p
ON hmblnr = pmblnr
AND hmjahr = pmjahr
INNER JOIN mara AS m
ON pmatnr = mmatnr
INNER JOIN t156 AS t
ON pbwart = tbwart
WHERE h~budat => gw_duepr-begda
AND h~budat <= gw_duepr-endda
AND p~werks = gw_werks.
Thanks so much for your help,
JayeshIssue with table s031 and with for all entries.
Hi,
I have following code in which select statement on s031 is
taking long time and after that it shows a dump. What should I do instead of
exceeding the time limit of execution of an abap program.
TYPES:
BEGIN OF TY_MTL, " Material Master
MATNR TYPE MATNR, " Material Code
MTART TYPE MTART, " Material Type
MATKL TYPE MATKL, " Material Group
MEINS TYPE MEINS, " Base unit of Measure
WERKS TYPE WERKS_D, " Plant
MAKTX TYPE MAKTX, " Material description (Short Text)
LIFNR TYPE LIFNR, " vendor code
NAME1 TYPE NAME1_GP, " vendor name
CITY TYPE ORT01_GP, " City of Vendor
Y_RPT TYPE P DECIMALS 3, "Yearly receipt
Y_ISS TYPE P DECIMALS 3, "Yearly Consumption
M_OPG TYPE P DECIMALS 3, "Month opg
M_OPG1 TYPE P DECIMALS 3,
M_RPT TYPE P DECIMALS 3, "Month receipt
M_ISS TYPE P DECIMALS 3, "Month issue
M_CLG TYPE P DECIMALS 3, "Month Closing
D_BLK TYPE P DECIMALS 3, "Block Stock,
D_RPT TYPE P DECIMALS 3, "Today receipt
D_ISS TYPE P DECIMALS 3, "Day issues
TL_FL(2) TYPE C,
STATUS(4) TYPE C,
END OF TY_MTL,
BEGIN OF TY_OPG , " Opening File
SPMON TYPE SPMON, " Period to analyze - month
WERKS TYPE WERKS_D, " Plant
MATNR TYPE MATNR, " Material No
BASME TYPE MEINS,
MZUBB TYPE MZUBB, " Receipt Quantity
WZUBB TYPE WZUBB,
MAGBB TYPE MAGBB, " Issues Quantity
WAGBB TYPE WAGBB,
END OF TY_OPG,
DATA :
T_M TYPE STANDARD TABLE OF TY_MTL INITIAL SIZE 0,
WA_M TYPE TY_MTL,
T_O TYPE STANDARD TABLE OF TY_OPG INITIAL SIZE 0,
WA_O TYPE TY_OPG.
DATA: smonth1 TYPE spmon.
SELECT
a~matnr
a~mtart
a~matkl
a~meins
b~werks
INTO TABLE t_m FROM mara AS a
INNER JOIN marc AS b
ON a~matnr = b~matnr
* WHERE a~mtart EQ s_mtart
WHERE a~matkl IN s_matkl
AND b~werks IN s_werks
AND b~matnr IN s_matnr .
endif.
SELECT spmon
werks
matnr
basme
mzubb
WZUBB
magbb
wagbb
FROM s031 INTO TABLE t_o
FOR ALL ENTRIES IN t_m
WHERE matnr = t_m-matnr
AND werks IN s_werks
AND spmon le smonth1
AND basme = t_m-meins. -
Interested by performance issue ? Read this ! If you can explain, you're a master Jedi !
This is the question we will try to answer...
What si the bottle neck (hardware) of Adobe Premiere Pro CS6
I used PPBM5 as a benchmark testing template.
All the data and log as been collected using performance counter
First of all, describe my computer...
Operating System
Microsoft Windows 8 Pro 64-bit
CPU
Intel Xeon E5 2687W @ 3.10GHz
Sandy Bridge-EP/EX 32nm Technology
RAM
Corsair Dominator Platinum 64.0 GB DDR3
Motherboard
EVGA Corporation Classified SR-X
Graphics
PNY Nvidia Quadro 6000
EVGA Nvidia GTX 680 // Yes, I created bench stats for both card
Hard Drives
16.0GB Romex RAMDISK (RAID)
556GB LSI MegaRAID 9260-8i SATA3 6GB/s 5 disks with Fastpath Chip Installed (RAID 0)
I have other RAID installed, but not relevant for the present post...
PSU
Cosair 1000 Watts
After many days of tests, I wanna share my results with community and comment them.
CPU Introduction
I tested my cpu and pushed it at maximum speed to understand where is the limit, can I reach this limit and I've logged precisely all result in graph (See pictures 1).
Intro : I tested my E5-XEON 2687W (8 Cores Hyperthread - 16 threads) to know if programs can use the maximum of it. I used Prime 95 to get the result. // I know this seem to be ordinary, but you will understand soon...
The result : Yes, I can get 100% of my CPU with 1 program using 20 threads in parallel. The CPU gives everything it can !
Comment : I put 3 IO (cpu, disk, ram) on the graph of my computer during the test...
(picture 1)
Disk Introduction
I tested my disk and pushed it at maximum speed to understand where is the limit and I've logged precisely all result in graph (See pictures 2).
Intro : I tested my RAID 0 556GB (LSI MegaRAID 9260-8i SATA3 6GB/s 5 disks with Fastpath Chip Installed) to know if I can reach the maximum % disk usage (0% idle Time)
The result : As you can see in picture 2, yes, I can get the max of my drive at ~ 1.2 Gb/sec read/write steady !
Comment : I put 3 IO (cpu, disk, ram) on the graph of my computer during the test to see the impact of transfering many Go of data during ~10 sec...
(picture 2)
Now, I know my limits ! It's time to enter deeper in the subject !
PPBM5 (H.264) Result
I rendered the sequence (H.264) using Adobe Media Encoder.
The result :
My CPU is not used at 100%, the turn around 50%
My Disk is totally idle !
All the process usage are idle except process of (Adobe Media Encoder)
The transfert rate seem to be a wave (up and down). Probably caused by (Encrypt time.... write.... Encrypt time.... write...) // It's ok, ~5Mb/sec during transfert rate !
CPU Power management give 100% of clock to CPU during the encoding process (it's ok, the clock is stable during process).
RAM, more than enough ! 39 Go RAM free after the test ! // Excellent
~65 thread opened by Adobe Media Encoder (Good, thread is the sign that program try to using many cores !)
GPU Load on card seem to be a wave also ! (up and down) ~40% usage of GPU during the process of encoding.
GPU Ram get 1.2Go of RAM (But with GTX 680, no problem and Quadro 6000 with 6 GB RAM, no problem !)
Comment/Question : CPU is free (50%), disks are free (99%), GPU is free (60%), RAM is free (62%), my computer is not pushed at limit during the encoding process. Why ???? Is there some time delay in the encoding process ?
Other : Quadro 6000 & GTX 680 gives the same result !
(picture 3)
PPBM5 (Disk Test) Result (RAID LSI)
I rendered the sequence (Disk Test) using Adobe Media Encoder on my RAID 0 LSI disk.
The result :
My CPU is not used at 100%
My Disk wave and wave again, but far far from the limit !
All the process usage are idle except process of (Adobe Media Encoder)
The transfert rate wave and wave again (up and down). Probably caused by (Buffering time.... write.... Buffering time.... write...) // It's ok, ~375Mb/sec peak during transfert rate ! Easy !
CPU Power management give 100% of clock to CPU during the encoding process (it's ok, the clock is stable during process).
RAM, more than enough ! 40.5 Go RAM free after the test ! // Excellent
~48 thread opened by Adobe Media Encoder (Good, thread is the sign that program try to using many cores !)
GPU Load on card = 0 (This kind of encoding is GPU irrelevant)
GPU Ram get 400Mb of RAM (No usage for encoding)
Comment/Question : CPU is free (65%), disks are free (60%), GPU is free (100%), RAM is free (63%), my computer is not pushed at limit during the encoding process. Why ???? Is there some time delay in the encoding process ?
(picture 4)
PPBM5 (Disk Test) Result (Direct in RAMDrive)
I rendered the same sequence (Disk Test) using Adobe Media Encoder directly in my RamDrive
Comment/Question : Look at the transfert rate under (picture 5). It's exactly the same speed than with my RAID 0 LSI controller. Impossible ! Look in the same picture the transfert rate I can reach with the ramdrive (> 3.0 Gb/sec steady) and I don't go under 30% of disk usage. CPU is idle (70%), Disk is idle (100%), GPU is idle (100%) and RAM is free (63%). // This kind of results let me REALLY confused. It's smell bug and big problem with hardware and IO usage in CS6 !
(picture 5)
PPBM5 (MPEG-DVD) Result
I rendered the sequence (MPEG-DVD) using Adobe Media Encoder.
The result :
My CPU is not used at 100%
My Disk is totally idle !
All the process usage are idle except process of (Adobe Media Encoder)
The transfert rate wave and wave again (up and down). Probably caused by (Encoding time.... write.... Encoding time.... write...) // It's ok, ~2Mb/sec during transfert rate ! Real Joke !
CPU Power management give 100% of clock to CPU during the encoding process (it's ok, the clock is stable during process).
RAM, more than enough ! 40 Go RAM free after the test ! // Excellent
~80 thread opened by Adobe Media Encoder (Lot of thread, but it's ok in multi-thread apps!)
GPU Load on card = 100 (This use the maximum of my GPU)
GPU Ram get 1Gb of RAM
Comment/Question : CPU is free (70%), disks are free (98%), GPU is loaded (MAX), RAM is free (63%), my computer is pushed at limit during the encoding process for GPU only. Now, for this kind of encoding, the speed limit is affected by the slower IO (Video Card GPU)
Other : Quadro 6000 is slower than GTX 680 for this kind of encoding (~20 s slower than GTX).
(picture 6)
Encoding single clip FULL HD AVCHD to H.264 Result (Premiere Pro CS6)
You can look the result in the picture.
Comment/Question : CPU is free (55%), disks are free (99%), GPU is free (90%), RAM is free (65%), my computer is not pushed at limit during the encoding process. Why ???? Adobe Premiere seem to have some bug with thread management. My hardware is idle ! I understand AVCHD can be very difficult to decode, but where is the waste ? My computer want, but the software not !
(picture 7)
Render composition using 3D Raytracer in After Effects CS6
You can look the result in the picture.
Comment : GPU seems to be the bottle neck when using After Effects. CPU is free (99%), Disks are free (98%), Memory is free (60%) and it depend of the setting and type of project.
Other : Quadro 6000 & GTX 680 gives the same result in time for rendering the composition.
(picture 8)
Conclusion
There is nothing you can do (I thing) with CS6 to get better performance actually. GTX 680 is the best (Consumer grade card) and the Quadro 6000 is the best (Profressional card). Both of card give really similar result (I will probably return my GTX 680 since I not really get any better performance). I not used Tesla card with my Quadro, but actually, both, Premiere Pro & After Effects doesn't use multi GPU. I tried to used both card together (GTX & Quadro), but After Effects gives priority to the slower card (In this case, the GTX 680)
Premiere Pro, I'm speechless ! Premiere Pro is not able to get max performance of my computer. Not just 10% or 20%, but average 60%. I'm a programmor, multi-threadling apps are difficult to manage and I can understand Adobe's programmor. But actually, if anybody have comment about this post, tricks or any kind of solution, you can comment this post. It's seem to be a bug...
Thank you.Patrick,
I can't explain everything, but let me give you some background as I understand it.
The first issue is that CS6 has a far less efficient internal buffering or caching system than CS5/5.5. That is why the MPEG encoding in CS6 is roughly 2-3 times slower than the same test with CS5. There is some 'under-the-hood' processing going on that causes this significant performance loss.
The second issue is that AME does not handle regular memory and inter-process memory very well. I have described this here: Latest News
As to your test results, there are some other noteworthy things to mention. 3D Ray tracing in AE is not very good in using all CUDA cores. In fact it is lousy, it only uses very few cores and the threading is pretty bad and does not use the video card's capabilities effectively. Whether that is a driver issue with nVidia or an Adobe issue, I don't know, but whichever way you turn it, the end result is disappointing.
The overhead AME carries in our tests is something we are looking into and the next test will only use direct export and no longer the AME queue, to avoid some of the problems you saw. That entails other problems for us, since we lose the capability to check encoding logs, but a solution is in the works.
You see very low GPU usage during the H.264 test, since there are only very few accelerated parts in the timeline, in contrast to the MPEG2-DVD test, where there is rescaling going on and that is CUDA accelerated. The disk I/O test suffers from the problems mentioned above and is the reason that my own Disk I/O results are only 33 seconds with the current test, but when I extend the duration of that timeline to 3 hours, the direct export method gives me 22 seconds, although the amount of data to be written, 37,092 MB has increased threefold. An effective write speed of 1,686 MB/s.
There are a number of performance issues with CS6 that Adobe is aware of, but whether they can be solved and in what time, I haven't the faintest idea.
Just my $ 0.02 -
Performance Issue for BI system
Hello,
We are facing performance issues for BI System. Its a preproductive system and its performance is degrading badly everyday. I was checking system came to know program buffer hit ratio is increaasing everyday due to high Swaps. So asked to change the parameter abap/buffersize which was 300Mb to 500Mb. But still no major improvement is found in the system.
There is 16GB Ram available and Server is HP-UX and with Netweaver2004s with Oracle 10.2.0.4.0 installed in it.
The Main problem is while running a report or creating a query is taking way too long time.
Kindly help me.Hello SIva,
Thanks for your reply but i have checked ST02 and ST03 and also SM50 and its normal
we are having 9 dialog processes, 3 Background , 2 Update and 1 spool.
No one is using the system currently but in ST02 i can see the swaps are in red.
Buffer HitRatio % Alloc. KB Freesp. KB % Free Sp. Dir. Size FreeDirEnt % Free Dir Swaps DB Accs
Nametab (NTAB) 0
Table definition 99,60 6.798 20.000 29.532 153.221
Field definition 99,82 31.562 784 2,61 20.000 6.222 31,11 17.246 41.248
Short NTAB 99,94 3.625 2.446 81,53 5.000 2.801 56,02 0 2.254
Initial records 73,95 6.625 998 16,63 5.000 690 13,80 40.069 49.528
0
boldprogram 97,66 300.000 1.074 0,38 75.000 67.177 89,57 219.665 725.703bold
CUA 99,75 3.000 875 36,29 1.500 1.401 93,40 55.277 2.497
Screen 99,80 4.297 1.365 33,35 2.000 1.811 90,55 119 3.214
Calendar 100,00 488 361 75,52 200 42 21,00 0 158
OTR 100,00 4.096 3.313 100,00 2.000 2.000 100,00 0
0
Tables 0
Generic Key 99,17 29.297 1.450 5,23 5.000 350 7,00 2.219 3.085.633
Single record 99,43 10.000 1.907 19,41 500 344 68,80 39 467.978
0
Export/import 82,75 4.096 43 1,30 2.000 662 33,10 137.208
Exp./ Imp. SHM 89,83 4.096 438 13,22 2.000 1.482 74,10 0
SAP Memory Curr.Use % CurUse[KB] MaxUse[KB] In Mem[KB] OnDisk[KB] SAPCurCach HitRatio %
Roll area 2,22 5.832 22.856 131.072 131.072 IDs 96,61
Page area 1,08 2.832 24.144 65.536 196.608 Statement 79,00
Extended memory 22,90 958.464 1.929.216 4.186.112 0 0,00
Heap memory 0 0 1.473.767 0 0,00
Call Stati HitRatio % ABAP/4 Req ABAP Fails DBTotCalls AvTime[ms] DBRowsAff.
Select single 88,59 63.073.369 5.817.659 4.322.263 0 57.255.710
Select 72,68 284.080.387 0 13.718.442 0 32.199.124
Insert 0,00 151.955 5.458 166.159 0 323.725
Update 0,00 378.161 97.884 395.814 0 486.880
Delete 0,00 389.398 332.619 415.562 0 244.495
Edited by: Srikanth Sunkara on May 12, 2011 11:50 AM
Maybe you are looking for
-
.oui error in the install of oracle database client in a linux CentOS
I am installing oracle database client in eqipo linux CentOS, after making all the passages for the creation of the user oracle and its groups beginning the ./runInstaller application and appears to me the following error: ./runInstaller: line 66: /i
-
Headphones issue after updating to iOS 6.1.4
I have not seen anyone else posting this issue but I feel like I can't be alone. I updated to iOS 6.1.4 and now any headphones I use are cracking and popping. I took my phone into the apple store after restoring as a new phone. I thought it was a har
-
How do I save photo's from a shared photostream that I have subscribed to, to my PC?
I was invited to subscribe to a shared photostream, I can now access these pictures on my iPhone. I want to save all of these pictures on my PC, is there an easy way of doing this? I expected to see these pictures in my 'Photo Stream' folder on my PC
-
AMD Athlon II X4 645 on Motherboard K9A2 CF
Hello, AMD Athlon II X4 645 on Motherboard K9A2 CF will not work?
-
Severly Scratched screen on HD-LCD TV
I recently acquired a 2008-37AV500U HD-LCD TV with a severly scratched screen. Is there a plastic cover in front of the picture screen or is the outer layer actually the screen itself? And also is it economically feasible to replace this screen? I'm