Projector best format for web download movie?

Converting a dxr/stub projector movie into a web download
movie and wondering if there are advantages to one over the other.
They're both protected...
Making one for mac, one for PC.

Can you not make it a Shockwave movie (compress to dcr) -
that way it
should play on both Mac and Win from the same file in the end
user's
browser of choice.

Similar Messages

  • Adobe v. Apple - Flash v. H.264 - what's the best format for web?

    So the iPad doesn't support flash.  I guess that means that if I upload my projects as flv's or f4v's and use a flash player then the apple obsessed people won't be able to watch my videos
    http://tech.fortune.cnn.com/2010/05/02/apple-vs-adobe-is-flash-dying/
    Personally, I don't really care if flash lives or dies.  I just want to be able to publish videos that anyone can watch in a player that anyone can use without having to download a plugin.  SO, what is the best format to use?
    To date, I've been shooting my footage in HD 1920x1080i, saving my PE projects as MPEG2 HD 1080i, and then converting to f4v's.  Now I'm wondering if I should be saving them using the H.264 preset instead and then presumably some lower quality settings for the web file?  And if so, what kind of end user player should I be looking for?
    Help anyone?

    Well, unfortunately Flash was the universal format, and then Steve Jobs decided that he did not like Adobe. As most browsers on Earth were FLV playback enabled and if not, were only a quick, free download away. Now, it seems that Apple's devices will only work with flavors of MOV. One can still download and install Apple's QT Player (though several recent versions did not work well with Adobe programs - Steve Jobs sabotage?).
    Instead of coming together on universal formats/CODEC's, it seems that many wish to fragment the market to support just their products. One is at the mercy of these hardware and software companies. Producers probably should now do several versions of everything, if they wish to cover all bases. Someone will have to download and install something.
    Good luck,
    Hunt

  • What is the BEST BEST format for web?

    Hi everyone,
    I've been reading a lot lately and I found that PNG should be the best format. However, in our website (www.popticular.com), when I save them as web and pick PNG with best quality the logo seems pixalted. Is there another setting?
    Feel free to log in to the site and check the lop left logo.
    Thanks.

    In answer to the original question - the absolutely very best format depends on content being saved.  Different image formats use different compression algorithms, so PNG are ideal for images with transparency or solid colors block (like text) without any gradients. JPEG are great for photographic images because JPEG compression references start / end pixels in a gradual color shift (like skin tone or clouds) and discards all pixel data in between.  Use preview mode in "save for web" to identify formats that work best for each particular image in terms of resulting size and quality. You do not need to save at 100% quality, human eye cannot tell the difference between 60% quality JPEG and 70% quality JPEG.
    As you get close to finalizing your design, you might want to run it through Web Preflight that will give you some guidance on any potential issues you might get when converting file into HTML - https://www.oss-usa.com/web-preflight?promo=adobe

  • Best format for web movies?

    My server here suggests Flash, but the samples we've done are not what I am hoping for. His next suggestion is Windows Media Player. What do you think? These would be 1 to 2 minute videos showing the features of camps, lodges, wildlife - at African destinations. I shoot them, edit them, and perhaps host them. The camp web site has the link to them. How do I get the best quality video on the web? BTW, I have just retired from operating safaris for 18 years and used video as part of my marketing. I'll be replacing my Canon G2 with a new Sony HD camera - not to put these little movies in HD, but to have that as the video I keep for possible other uses by the camps.

    MPEG-1 files (how old is 1991) must completely download before viewer playback can begin. They are huge in file size compared to modern QuickTime formats.
    H.264 would require all of your viewers to have QuickTIme 7. Not really much of an issue as it is now 2 years old and ships with iTunes (Mac or PC's).
    Flash video will require special software to convert your files.
    Same with WMP formats and any re-compression degrades video quality.
    You can reach a bit larger audience (QT 6 and 7) by using the MPEG-4 Video codec.
    I would export to QuickTime Movie and do a few tests of the MPEG-4 Video and AAC audio compression settings.
    Web viewers need a speedy download and are used to poor quality audio and video. If you don't need "stereo", switch to mono and save half of the bandwidth resources. Same with the frame rate of your source files. Cut it to "half" (15fps) and save some file size.
    Lots of tricks and only you can test your files prior to upload.

  • Best format for web

    I know, this has been asked a bizzillion times. My client has a website where they sell coaching videos. They would like to have the user click on a thumbnail and a 30-60 sec. video appears with an introduction. I need to find a video format that is most compatible with the most users, i am assuming it would be some kind of mpeg, perhaps mpeg 1?
    Thaks,
    James

    According to recent stats from Adobe/Macromedia, the current worldwide penetration for the Flash Player is over 96% for the v7 player and over 99% for the v6 player. The v7 player is the one that will support streaming FLV video created in Flash 8.
    That seems pretty universal to me.
    A lot better than QuickTime, unfortunately. Too bad - H.264 kicks butt!
    I've been a Flash developer since version 1.0, and I've had little or no problems with clients worrying about Flash Player availability on viewer platforms for about the past two years.
    Before then it was a much different story. I couldn't get clients to use Flash because of the player/plug-in access issue. It was a real tough sell.
    But lately, I have clients demanding to use Flash. In fact I just got a client back who wants me to build them a Flash-based website. It's really sweet because four years ago they pulled a Flash-based site I built for them after only four months of operation because of "perceived issues" with Flash Player access and alleged search engine compatibility problems. Now they are demanding to use Flash.
    Now is a good time to be a Flash developer. Finally. It's been too long a time coming from my perspective.
    Too bad about that H.264, though. Like I said, it kicks butt!

  • Best Format for Archiving Video Files

    I am importing old VHS and 8mm family videos for my cousin, to both burn them to DVD, and to archive the movies in case he wants to edit them later.
    I am planning on purchasing for him, a "write once," external HDD, probably firewire, (though I am open to suggestions), to put both the backup Video TS folders on, as well as the Quicktime movies themselves.
    My guess is, the best format for the QT movies would be their original DV-NTSC, but at around 13GB an hour, this can add up pretty fast.
    The h264 .mov codec looks great, takes forever to render, and it seems the file size difference to DV-NTSC is nominal at best.
    Obviously the future is some kind of HD, so these movies will never look great years from now, but I want them to be preserved for him at the best quality possible, at the smallest file size, if it will not compromise the quality too much.
    I know I can render them significantly smaller as h264 .mp4 files, or as DIVX, (which also takes a long time), but I imagine they are of significantly reduced quality that would be visible in future video editing he might do.
    If DV-NTSC is the only way to go, so be it. But if not, then any suggestions for what other format I could use to save these QT files, without visible loss of quality is greatly appreciated.

    Thanks for all the advice. And I mean everyone.
    Here is my latest dilemma.
    Though 15 years old, the original Vhs's play beautifully. Aside from some (expected) glitches in the beginning or end of some of the shots, the video has not degraded appreciably. This is great news, as my cousin wanted to make back ups before degradation begins.
    First, I captured the Vhs movies and corrected some bad color, mostly due to poor white balancing, and on the computer, they looked great in comparison. I burned DVD's and they looked terrible in comparison with the originals. Now I know I am going to lose some resolution when going to DVD, but it seemed harsh, so I ran some tests.
    I burned a DVD of the original capture, with no color correction, just the raw footage and the DVD did not look much better, so it wasn't the color correction.
    Not satisfied, I made a copy from the FCP timeline straight to Vhs, (I should note, through the ADVC-110.) This looked significantly degraded as well.
    Finally, I made a straight dub from Vhs to DVCam, figuring that had to look good, and that also looked significantly degraded, compared to the, (now looking pristine), Vhs original.
    As the original Vhs looks so good, what good would a TBC do? Or a proc amp?
    Is there some secret to capturing and exporting Vhs that I am missing? Or, will it always look significantly degraded, even straight to DVCam?
    +David Murray wrote: There is an industrial way to get good VhS copies but it is extremely expensive+
    I don't know what this is, but I am sure it is clearly out of our league, but David M., if you are still following this thread, I'm curious, would this ultra expensive method actually result in a dub that looks like the original? I am actually really shocked at how bad the straight DVCam dub looks. It really does not look much better than the color corrected, computer exported version.
    The Vhs tapes of my cousins daughter are as precious to him as anything he has.
    As they date back 15 years, he is concerned about the longevity of the tapes.
    As there are over forty hours of them, he wants them to be in an editable format, so later he or his daughter can make a highlight reel, or whatever. So thus the QT movie archive/backup on HD.
    Whether as Finalcutter said, that this drive, even if unused, and put in a cool dry safe, might not function years down the line, makes it iffy, but what other choice is there for editable versions, unless I break the QT movies up into 20 minute chunks and archive them to over a hundred DVD's instead. Perhaps that is the safest solution, though certainly time consuming.
    As failure of the HDD somewhere in the future is likely, though not certain, I am still not sure that the HDD holding all his QT movies for future editing is the wrong way to go.
    As it is a digital version, and not an analog copy, I get that a DVCam backup of the originals is the best option. I will suggest to him that we do this as well, even though he does not have DVCam himself. But again, is there something I am missing here? Why does the Vhs to DVCam copy look so degraded? Is there anything I can do to keep the original quality, or will it die with his original Vhs as it slowly degrades over time?

  • Best format for viewing movie on Windows ?

    Hi,
    I use a Mac, but need to make compressed movies for someone to download and view on a Windows PC. They are accessing the movies from various internet cafes, and the computers dont always have QuikTime installed. What is the best format to save my movie in to allow them to view it without needing to download additional software?
    Thanks....

    mpeg1

  • Best Program for editing quicktime movies

    What is the best program for editing quicktime movies.
    For example, I have several quicktime movies in the 4:3 aspect ratio, but the video is ment to be 16:9 so there is black on the top and bottom. I want to be able to crop out the black and make the video file a true 16:9 wide screen video becuase my laptop has a widescreen 16:10 aspect ratio lcd. And when playing back these videos, you end up with a couple inches of black on the top and bottom, and right and left, so a lot of screen space get's waisted. The only programs I have found so far that can make a 16:9 quicktime video have not supported the H.264 format, and only stetch the video to 16:9 rather then croping it, so the black remains on the top and bottom and the aspect ratio is off and every one looks short and fat becuase it's not in its native aspect ratio correctly.
    Does anyone have any advice on what program I should use?
    Also, does anyone have any recomendatiosn for how to convert wmv files to quicktime / itunes videos? I have found one program that does so, but it comes out very blocky and the audio is out of sync with the video by a good five seconds.
    Thanks

    MPEG Streamclip (free) can crop and Save As so you wouldn't need to add any new compression to the existing files.
    The make a Windows version now (it used to be Mac only).
    No tips on converting WMP files but you'll find dozens of solutions in the iPod Discussions pages.

  • Best format for DVD studio pro??

    I will be exporting from FCP4.5 and am wondering what is the best format to get the best possible quality from FCP to DVDSP? Also, should I go through compressor and what settings should I use?
    I also want to make my own video transistions, what is the best format for those as well?
    Thank You

    The movie is 90 minutes.
    You didn't mention your video format. You can export your movie as QuickTime Movie (not QT Conversion), same settings and self contained (my favorite flavor). The use that movie in Compressor and use the Best Quality DVD: 90 min presets encoding your video to MPEG2 and your audio to Dolby 2 (AC3).
    That's the best standard workflow. With standard I mean that sometimes some kind of footage can need different treatment.
    Hope that helps !
      Alberto

  • Best Format For Front Row

    Hi what is the best format for videos in front row? Most videos I have are avis so I had been saving them as .mov files instead until recently when I discovered I could export them to Mpeg4 and in the process make them widescreen - I also noticed that when I saved these videos as .mov they took up about 5 gb but as mp4 they took up 500mb. So anyone have any opinions on what is the best way to do it?
    Cheers

    AVI and MOV are both simply "containers". The video and audio files inside them can be many formats with less or more compression. The MPEG-4 compression can be very good, of course, depending on the quality of the original file. The MOV files you saved must be using a different type of video compression that may be better quality but takes up more hard drive space. The "best" type of compression is probably a personal choice. What type of software are you using to save the files? QuickTime Pro?
    -Doug

  • Best format for ps3 and apple tv

    What is the best format for viewing movies on a hdtv (1080p) via ps3 and apple tv?
    Not sure what my best option would be in the sharing/export options, also should I make it 16:9 even though all the footage was 4:3?
    Message was edited by: rwltrz4

    Thanks.
    I've posted up on their forum too (the folks over there are not as responsive as you guys, helpful, but not in the same volume )
    I kinda hear what you're saying, but the encoding time (fps and time taken) is pretty slow on my PPC G5 iMac at the moment, and if the Turbo.264 is doing most of the processing then from what you say it'll stay the same on a new Intel Mac. I really hope not, or it'll be me throwing in the whole notion of recording TV on my Mac and heading off down the shop for a PlayTV for the PS3.
    Either that or hope for a decent upgrade to the Mini at Macworld, sling the Apple TV on to ebay (film rental selection here in the UK is still pretty weak) and replace with a Mini, plug the tuner in that and watch native EyeTV recordings without the need for lengthy encoding. I reckon Front Row, and an iPhone Remote will do almost as good a job for my music as the Apple TV does.
    One day we will look back and laugh at the notion of an hour long TV show being 'encoded' for playback at all, let alone waiting more than 2 minutes for the process to happen!

  • Best format for Premiere elements 12?

    What is the best format for making movies on PRE 12? My clips are now .mov files, whether on iPhone 5 or Nikon 7000 SLR. Should I still convert them to .AVI files?

    fish614
    Are you working with Nikon D7000 as well as the iPhone video?
    What are your settings for these devices when you record?
    How do you want to view the export of your Premiere Elements Timeline after you edit this video on the Premiere Elements Timeline?
    ATR

  • Best format for upload to a website

    i would like to know what is the best format for upload to a website, what i got now is an exported quicktime self contained movie from fcp 25 minutes in length.
    the footage itself is shot on mini dv and edited on an uncompressed 8 bit sequence, when exported to quicktime it is 28 gb in size so it is kind of a heavy one.
    is it possible to upload it in one piece ( apple recommends exporting to mpeg4 yet i got a bad quality out of this using mpeg streamclip.
    what would be the best compreessor for this
    than you very much

    i got a bad quality out of this using mpeg streamclip.
    Check the links that Cristina posted, then let us know if your quality improved, using Compressor...it should.
    One question for you regarding quality...are you referring to overall quality of the full frame image, or are you displeased with text/graphics.
    If this is the case, then I'd wonder if you edited in a DV sequence, then dropped the edited content into an 8bit timeline for exporting at better quality.
    This can cause degradation of the image (particularly text/graphics), since you're taking a 720x480 frame and ever-so-slightly vertically scaling the frame up to 720x486.
    Let us know what you did...and your results w/Compressor.
    K

  • The best format for output

    Hi All,
    working in animation project to be broadcasted on a TV channel as HD1080 50i,
    1- all the animation layers was rendered from TOONBOOM as .SWF to keep it in vector for compositing issue.
    Dose SWF lose any quality? we always use TGA sequence with alpha in our past SD projects but now we found SWF is a smaller file size and allows zooming Because it keeps all vector lines.
    2- compositing each scene in after effects cs6 and then render them.
    What is the best format for output to deal with premiere cs6 as a real time playback ( my editing pc includes gtx680 4gb., many HGST 3tb with raid controller,64g ram, aja kona 3g) so do I go with TGA sequence (I think it will destroy the raid Because of the large number of small-sized files in read and write ) or MOV uncompressed (I'm afraid of the space size and don’t know it will play in real time ) or what is the best compressed format Maintaining video image quality as its now will be my only master source?
    Many thanks,
    sherif

    Thanks Rick for your reply,
    Regarding the SWF i moved to flash pro forums and they are supporting me now,
    My system is a pc, win.64, I7-3930K, 64G RAM, EVGA GTX680 4G, Many HGST 3TB with raid controler,
    Some advised me to go with Quicktime Prores HQ or DNXHD or DPX ,
    In this year project my client's requirement for delivery is :
    DNxHD 120 Codec, wrapped with QuickTime rapper, which means a file with MOV extension and the codec used is DNxHD 120 ( 1080@50i HD)
    So do i work with dnxhd 120 from the beginning to the delivery? (and it will be my only master source) or another format encode it at the end to dnxhd 120? ( i will distribut this project to many channels after the first run exclusivity period end with different requirements).
    Thanks,
    Sherif

  • Best book for Web Services

    Can you suggest me what's best book for Web Services and XML to study? I'm planning to buy..
    Thanks in advance..

    Why does it need to be the best one? What would that even mean? Just buy something reputable, like an O'Reilly book, it's not going to be so horrifically poor that you can't learn from it

Maybe you are looking for