Projects Release - Error: Enter a Distribution Rule for Asset without val

Hi Experts ,
While Releasing Projects , we got error :
Enter a Distribution Rule for Asset without a Validity limit.
Message No : KD059.
Diagnosis:
The settelement Profile used requires you to define a distribution rule for asset . For period 005 , 2009 , however not created a distribution rule for Asset.
We gave checked Settelement Profile , still we are not clear what settings is causes for this error ,
Please throw some light on if some one come across ...
Regards,
Sujana

check out OSS note 115618

Similar Messages

Got error "Enter distribution rule for Asset without a validity limit"

Hi
I need to make AUC settlement to GL account using t.code AIAB. I have maintained the settlement rule but when I click on check button I got message " Enter distribution rule for Asset without a validity limit". The error msg no. KD059.
Thanks in advance.

Please do the
following. , instead of assigning cost center, assign fixed asset(any asset)
Then go back and click on detach then create your normal rule again at the same
line
The rule is that AUC should have at least one settlements rule for fixed asset
even if it not used

Error in global conversion rule for InfoObject 0PERSLANGU when activating

Dear Experts
We are working on HR in BI7.0 with Ehp1.
I am trying to Activate the Transfer Rules of 0HR_PA_PA_1 DataSource which has the BID (BW Development) as the Source System to itself in order to load 0PAPA_C02 (Headcount) InfoCube.
When trying to Activate, it gives the following error message:
Error in global conversion rule for InfoObject 0PERSLANGU
Message no. RSAR263
Diagnosis
Errors with the global conversion rule for the field 0PERSLANGU.
System Response
The function module delivers the following error message:
Incorrect statament: Expression missing Operand mi
Procedure
Check the definition of the global conversion rule for an InfoObject.
In fact, we are Re-implementing 3.0b BW System in new BI7.0 Ehp1 System. I have checked the Config of InfoObject 0PERSLANGU to the one available in existing BWP (3.0b Production) system and it's all the same.
Has anyone come across similar error message and how did you resolve. Any help is very much appreciated.
Many Thanks,
Chandu

HI Chandu ,
It is a bug in the system , can you take a look at the SAP note
Note 1070702 - RSAR 263: Error in global conversion rule for InfoObject
Hope it helps ,
Regards,'
Sathya

Error in global conversion rule for InfoObject 0INCOTERMS2

When I activate BI content 2LIS_12_VCITM with transfer rule, The transfer rule was error with the message " Error in global conversion rule for InfoObject 0INCOTERMS2" and Mgs No. 263.
The transfer rule cannot be activated.
I checked the 0INCOTERMS2 infoObject . The global conversion rule is no error.
The global conversion is in below.
============================================================
PROGRAM CONVERSION_ROUTINE.
Type pools used by conversion program
TYPE-POOLS: RSD, RSARC, RSARR.
TYPES: DE_0INCOTERMS2(000028) TYPE C.
Conversion rule for InfoObject 0INCOTERMS2
    Data type       = CHAR
    ABAP type       = C
    ABAP length     = 000028
FORM CONVERT_0INCOTERMS2
USING    RECORD_NO LIKE SY-TABIX
           SOURCE_SYSTEM TYPE RSA_LOGSYS
           IOBJ_NAME TYPE RSIOBJNM
CHANGING RESULT TYPE DE_0INCOTERMS2 " InfoObject value
           RETURNCODE LIKE SY-SUBRC.
$$ begin of routine - insert your code only below this line        -
TRANSLATE RESULT TO UPPER CASE.
$$ end of routine - insert your code only before this line         -
ENDFORM.
=================================================================
If you have any idea or face the similar problem, please suggest solution.
Thank you.

Good afternoon,
If you have not done so already can you apply the SAP note 1387854 in your system and it should prevent the problem from happening again. If you also reactivate the infoobject 0INCOTERMS2 in RSD1 then it should be possible to manually activate the transfer rule.
Best Regards,
Des

File2idoc:Error in ALE distribution model for SendResponse

Hi,
I'm using XI to configure a file to idoc scenario.
Now in WE19 I could see relevant data,but in WE05 it showed the error status 51,and the detail message was "Error in ALE distribution model for SendResponse".
Do I have to create a distribution model in BD64?I did this ,but failed to create.

hi,
i dont think distribution model is required for inbound case.
just check the below configuration.
File To IDOC - Part1 (SLD and Design):
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/wiki?path=/display/profile/2007/05/11/fileToIDOC&
File To IDOC - Part2 (Configuration):
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/wiki?path=/display/profile/2007/05/11/fileToIDOC-Part2+(Configuration)&
File To IDOC - Part3 (Steps required in XI and R3):
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/wiki?path=/display/profile/2007/05/11/fileToIDOC-Part3(StepsrequiredinXIandR3)&
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/wiki?path=/display/xi/sapR3%28Idocs%29ToXI--Steps+Summarized&
chirag

Error in global conversion rule for InfoObject when Activating 2LIS_11_V_IT

Hello,
I am facing several issues while activating the Content. For 2LIS_11_V_ITM I get the following message:
Error in global conversion rule for InfoObject 0INCOTERMS2
Message no. RSAR263
Diagnosis
Errors with the global conversion rule for the field 0INCOTERMS2.
System Response
The function module delivers the following error message:
Incorrect statament: Expression missing Operand mi
Procedure
Check the definition of the global conversion rule for an InfoObject.
Any suggestion?
thanks,

Hi Mohan,
seems this message is common when activating BI_CONT.
I believe what i did was:
- go to the InfoObject
- verified Object Routine (check) (then was ok).
- Removed Object form DS
- Activated DS (w/o info object was giving problems)
- Placed InfoObject back to the DS
- Activated DS but now including Info Object
Believe that worked for me.
Let me know how it goes.

Error in global conversion rule for 0DOC_CATEG

Hi Friends,
My transfer rules are inactive for 2LIS_11_VAITM. When i tried to get activate i am getting the below error message...
Error in global conversion rule for 0DOC_CATEG
How i can activate the transfer rules.
is there any global routine for this infoobject.
Please suggest a solution.
Thanks & Regards,
Anand

Hi Reddy,
Goto Change mode of the info object 0DOC_CATEG. Just edit the description of 0DOC_CATEG by adding a "." and activate it.
Again change the description by removing the "." and activate the info object.
After doing this, activate the transfer rules. It'll work fine.
-- Selva

Error - No GL account selected for Asset account in Business partner master

Hi Experts,
Scenario - While adding A/P Invoice for Asset item, the error "Error - No GL account selected for Asset account in Business partner master Message (3518-13)
Awaiting your replies
Regards,
Sid

Hi,
You need to map the control account of that vendor(business partner).
->Open the respective Business Partner master data
->Under accounting tab
->Under General tab
->Control accounts (will be indicated with ... button),on opening this
->You will be prompted to map the control accounts
                                         ^ Down Payment Payables
                                         ^Assets Account
                                         ^Open Debts
Here you need to map the Asset account which also must be a control account(control account option should be checked in the chart of accounts).
Pls do check in the test system,understand the behavior of this account by booking ap invoice and payment,then proceed in the live system.
Hope this is helpful

Can we close Fiscal Year for Assets without posting Depreciation?

Hi All,
My client has 11 Company Codes. During the year end activity, I closed the FY of Assets for 10 Co. codes (T.code AJAB) and 1 is pending as depreciation is not posted for some assets yet. The client wants me to close the FY for assets without posting the depreciation.
Can anyone guide me on following doubts:
1. Is it possible to Close FY for assets without posting depn?
2. If YES, then what can be the adverse consequences of it?
3. If NO, then what is the alternative reply I can give to my client?
I hope the above info. is sufficient.
Regards
Amarendra

Hi All,
Finally I got the solution. I had to do some off track adjustment which might not be allowed otherwise. After getting that confirmation from the client that:
1. They want to post zero values towards Depreciation for the year 2007 &
2. After closing the year, later on there wont be any adjustments for the closed FY 2007
When client gave me above confirmation i did following steps:
1.Note down the Current Depreciation Key of the asset
2.Change the current depreciation key to u201C0000 - No depreciation and no interestu201D (TC: AS02)
3.Close the fiscal year 2007 (TC: AJAB)
4.Change the u201COrdinary Depreciation Startu201D date to 01.04.2008 for ALL the Depreciation Areas of that asset (AS02)
5. Restore the Depreciation Keys of the assets as per the step 1 (TC: AS02)
6.Open New Fiscal Year 2009 (TC: AJRW)
So now the depreciation will be calculated from 01.04.2008 and no values are posted towards depreciation for the year 2007.
Off course in the normal course of time above solutions are useful.
Regards,
Amarendra

AIAB Distribution Rule for Settlement Error, "Asset cannot settle to itself"

Hello Everyone,
I have a customer who is getting the "asset cannot settle to itself" error when trying to set up a distribution rule to settle the remaining items of a Line Item Managed AUC to multiple Assets. The Asset numbers and AUC number do NOT match. Here are the steps that have been followed.
Created an Internal Order, #2000####. (1998)
Created the AuC asset. #600####(2011)
Created Settlement Rule (Sender – Internal Order, Receiver - AUC) (2011
Settle Internal Order to AUC.
Create Assets. (2014). #900###1 - #900##99 etc.
Create Settlement Rule (Sender – AUC, Receiver – Multiple Assets) This is where my customer gets the error.
They were able to settle other items from this AuC to Assets last October. It seems very strange to me that the Internal Order was created in 1998 and the AUC was created in 2011 but as I said, this was working at least last October and possibly in March of this year.
Thanks for you help.
Rick

Hello Stacy,
Sorry I didn't get back to you sooner but I just had a major implementation go live on the 2nd so I've been rather busy. I opened a ticket with SAP on this and this is what was found.
Joachim from SAP Support explained that the AUC had been settled to itself last year, that is the posting the program was throwing the error on. My assumption is that we were able to settle AUC's to themselves prior to our March upgrade. This explains the problem and we have a resolution. We are transferring AUCs that this has happened with to a new AUC and then settling the new AUC as usual.
I believe SAP fixed a bug that had previously allowed AUC's to settle to themselves in one of the updates but because this AUC had a record from the past where it settled to itself the program was validating old line items and that is why it throws the error.
Ramnik's suggestion was another option but we didn't want to change the message to a warning because we didn't want anyone to settle an asset to itself.
Hope this helps.
Thanks,
Rick

Itu00B4s possible to change the Distribution rules for a order type RM01 ??

Hi Experts:
I need to change the settlement rule which is automatic created at the moment that you create a Cost colector (class order RM01) transaction KKF6N..
but when I go into KKF6N transaction and I select the "change" option and after that I go into settlement rule screen, I can´t change the distribution rule.
I would need to change the settlement type from "PER" value to "TOT" value.. It´is possible in this kind of Cost colectors??
Thanks and regards!
Manuel

Hi,
Please note that you will not be able to change manually the settlement rule for a cost collector.
When you save, the system creates a settlement rule for the product cost collector.
The settlement rule for the product cost collector always specifies the distribution rule "100% to material" and the settlement type is always PER (periodic).
Also refer the note 388457 in which one of the paragraph it says "As of Release 4.5, a special settlement rule is generated when you create a product cost collector (with procedure 5: delivery value for product cost collector). You cannot subsequently change this settlement rule".
regards
Waman

Distribution rules for Settlement Profile

Hi
I have setup a PM Orders which collect all the maintenance and running cost of vehicles (equipments). I have assigned settlement Profile "Internal Order" with settlement rule "Mandatory for release".
Now when I click settlement rule button in work order, there are two distribution rules PER and FUL both 100% and to same cost centre (which belongs to equipment).
Is this normal to have two distribution rules? will it cause any issues? where can I go to setup distribution rule to just one e.g FUL 100 (just one line), if I have to.
Thanks in Advance.

hi..
1. This is SAto creat two dis rule by default.
2. This will not creat any problem in settlement.
Basic concept is :
A) Maintenance Order settlement rule having 2 lines that is Per & Ful. Peroidic Settlement- in this settlement rule system settle whatever cost occurs upto today & suppose in future if you want to charge some more cost on the same Maint. Order then system will accept it. And when ful or Final settlement runs the rest of the cost will settle to the cost receiver.
B) You need not to delete any line whether this is PER or FUL.Its depends upon the settlement job which is done manually or schedule batch job. Suppose you has created schedule batch job for PER and FUL both. And the schedule frequency of PER is weekly and schedule frequency of FUL is monthly.
I think this will give you some light on this issue.
kkumar

Delete Distribution Rules For AUC

Hi,
I am wroking on one problem address to me. User haas created 999 distribution rule group for AUC settlement...and getting error message KD803.... Maximum distribution rule group reached.(T code AIAB).. we have implemented note 720619 and 483600 to delete unused distribution rule group.... but I am still not able to delete the same....as I found in programme (Z_SAP_SRULE_DEl_DISTR_GROUPS) it is not supporting assets rule group....
can you please suggest some other way how to delete Dist. rule group.....
Regards,

Hello
If any un used rules are there then only the said programme deleted the rule, if 999 rules are used then it is better to look for other options like transfer the values to another Internal order
Thanks
Kameshwar Rao

Error when activating update rules for R/3 training and event management

hi all,
when iam trying to activate update rules for training and event management cube it is giving fallowing error."IC=0PE_C01 IS=0HR_PE_1 error when checking the update rules
Message no. RSAU461".
please guide me how to solve this issue.
thanks & regards
Vamshi D Krishna

Hi Vamsi,
Have you followed the following document to implement HR ?
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/a0780530-bf03-2b10-d5ad-e9e8a53def23

Error while installing transfer rules for 0PM_C03 from Business content

Hi All,
When i try to install the transfer rules for the Infocube 0PM_C03 from the Business Content, i get the following error:
"Mapping between 2LIS_17_I3HDR 2LIS_17_ORDER is inconsistent".
Here 2LIS_17_ORDER is the Infosource, and 2LIS_17_I3HDR is the datasource.
Also, kindly let me know how can the Infosource and the datasource have different names, like in the case for this Cube.
Kindly help...

Hi,
The datasource and infosource can have different names no issue with that.
and while selecting transfer rule for installing find with '2LIS_17_I3HDR'.
Regards,
Rathy

Projects Release - Error: Enter a Distribution Rule for Asset without val

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for