Promise 20376 Linux support for KT-4

Check below for the correct link

download the drivers that you need. MSI also gives support for this chipset.
It does work. I am using the SATA Raid 0 with Red Hat 8.0 kernel 2.4.18-14
Linux support for the KT-4 SATA Raid Controller

Similar Messages

Red hat Linux support for Oracle

Hi! Can some body tell me which version of Red Hat Linux is supported. I was told that Oracle supports only upto Red hat 7.1 for Oracle 8.1.7.3.
thanks

I installed 9iAS on RedHat 7.3, see my post at:
Re: SQL query report columns
I don't know about versions < 7.3, but 7.3 by default includes kde 3 :)

Linux support for SB Live 24 bit on my MSI K8N SLI Plati

I've one problem: SB Li've 24 bit PCI come with LINE-IN and MIC that are the same jack.
With my motherboard MSI K8N SLI Platinum I've an integrated SB Li've 24 bit that however has one jack for MIC and one different for LINE-IN.
This is GREAT, however under Linux my LINE-IN doesn't work, due to lack of informations to how to implement this feature.
I've asked to MSI to help ALSA developers and they answer to ask to Creative.
So I'm here to ask a very little effort to help ALSA developers to implement this feature for my motherboard.
This is the link to do it:
https://bugtrack.alsa-project.org/alsa-bug/view.php?id=33
Thanx for any help!

$I take you do know about MS pulling Direct Sound 3D out Vista on up
EAX or Direct Sound 3D version?is in Alchemy how ever you will need a Sound Blaster Audigy on up
http://www.creative.com/soundblaster/alchemy/

Advice on Linux support for some chipsets (or vice versa :) )

I'm considering to buy a new Core 2 CPU and the P35 chipset is recommended by many, but experienced only with Windows. I read for lots of troubles with the ICH9 (kernel crashes etc) over the net. I want also to make an RAID 1 or 5, depending on my finances :0
So I wonder if someone who has some relevant experience could give me a piece of advice about what chipset to choose.

Moved to Kernel & Hardware.

Arch Linux Support for Atmel ATmega168

I'm thinking about buying this ATmega168: http://www.amazon.com/NerdKits-USB-Micr … B001I08PK8
I'm wondering if the avrdude, binutils-avr, and gcc-avr packages (http://www.archlinux.org/packages/?q=avr) will work with it... Does anyone know?
Last edited by tony5429 (2011-11-24 02:06:40)

not only yes. but heck yes. I use D.) All of the above on every AVR micro I have (including the ATmega168). sparkfun.com has a really good tutorial for getting started. I suggest it. (it is a windows tutorial, but the exact same software works the same on any PC.) One benefit of this tutorial is that it provides a fantastic skeleton makefile for all of your future AVR programming needs.
oh yeah, and AVRFreaks.com is another really good resource. I do quite a bit of work with AVR micro's. so if you ever have any specific questions feel free to PM me.

Nokia PC Suite support for Outlook and Thunderbird

Hi,
I am currently using the Microsoft Outlook 2007 combined with Nokia PC Suite to synchronize the contents of the Outlook with my Nokia N73 smartphone. I am now considering to switch e-mail client from Microsoft Outlook to the Mozilla Thunderbird. So my question is then, is Nokia PC Suite compatible with Mozilla Thunderbird?
I have in fact already installed Thunderbird, but it is not available as an option anywhere in the settings for Nokia PC Suite. All I can find in the Nokia PC Suite settings is a tab called "Microsoft Outlook" where I can choose the different Outlook profiles or change settings. In my humble opinion there should be a new tab added called "Thunderbird" or similar right next to the "Microsoft Outlook" tab in the settings for Nokia PC Suite after installing another e-mail client such as the Mozilla Thunderbird.
I know that there is this option to choose what e-mail client to use upon installing Nokia PC Suite, where I have chosen Outlook. Does this mean that I have to reinstall Nokia PC Suite to get this choice to choose e-mail client to use? If I do reinstall Nokia PC Suite, will I even get to this option at all? Since I am only reinstalling Nokia PC Suite and it is already configured once to be used with Outlook, I'm thinking that maybe this option will not even appear upon reinstalling Nokia PC Suite.
I don't have a clear memory of it but I think I once reinstalled Nokia PC Suite for some reason and I was not presented with this option to choose e-mail client as the first time I installed it. So this may require complete uninstallation and deletion of files and Windows registry for Nokia PC Suite, and then a fresh installation of it to get to this window where to choose e-mail client.
Even when and if I get to that window, it's no guarantee that I will be able to choose Thunderbird even thou it's installed. Why? Because I know from experience that commercial and proprietary software like Nokia PC Suite tends to only support the industry standard platforms and systems and applications, or de-facto industry standards like the extensively used Microsoft Outlook and other Microsoft products. I know by experience that such software as Nokia PC Suite love to lick Microsoft's **bleep**. Don't you think?... or don't you know? You disagree? Well lay it on me, tell me what you think!
I would love to be able to synchronize my mobile phone with my computer, even if I may use a Linux or other nix-like operating system. But if Nokia PC Suite doesn't even support e-mail clients other then Microsoft Outlook, such as the Thunderbird, then it's probably too much to ask for a Linux support for Nokia PC Suite. Or is it?... does Nokia PC Suite support Linux?...

Thanks for your answers!
By this time I have made a clean install of Windows Vista at least three times, and on one occasion I remembered to check this this thesis of mine that I mentioned above. So for the purpose of testing if it's true that the Nokia PC Suite installation process or Nokia PC Sync configuration wizard does not present the user with the option to choose Mozilla Thunderbird as e-mail client, I have done the following.
I have made a completely clean, out of the box installation of Windows Vista on the computer (retail version, non-custom branded Vista version). After installing the needed and important drivers for the system and other software required for the proper operation of the system and few other software, I went on installing Microsoft Office with Outlook 2007 as one of the first software applications. Then I installed Mozilla Firefox and Mozilla Thunderbird. After I had done that, I installed the Nokia PC Suite.
As my thesis predicted, after successfully installing Nokia PC Suite and the Nokia PC Sync configuration wizard was started, I was not presented with the option to choose Mozilla Thunderbird as my e-mail client, even thou both Microsoft Outlook and Mozilla Thunderbird were installed prior to or before Nokia PC Sync. In other words, if this was a limitation of the Nokia PC Suite or it's installer, where it does not recognize e-mail clients that are installed after Nokia PC Suite itself, then installing the e-mail clients in this order should make Nokia PC Suite recognize it. But it did not, or at least as long as the Mozilla Thunderbird is concerned. Thus, this proves my thesis - Nokia PC Suite is currently not compatible with Mozilla Thunderbird. And Mobile Sensei Petrib confirms this also.
Here follows a screenshot of the actual Nokia PC Sync configuration wizard.
http://img341.imageshack.us/img341/9803/nokiapcsyncsd3.jpg
I'm afraid we will have to bear with this. I personally don't believe that there will ever be any official release of Nokia PC Suite that will have full support (or any at all) for other e-mail clients then just Microsoft Outlook and Lotus, or that there will be any official Linux or nix-like version of it. Not today, not in next five years, and not in one thousand light-years from today. We can hope, but the odds are pointing in the opposite direction.
So bear with Microsoft Outlook, and the Windows **bleep**. No pay, no play! Unfortunately... fortunate for Microsoft, Nokia, and others alike, but unfortunate for us end users.
Message Edited by altair8801 on 27-Dec-2008 01:31 PM

Why Apple does not offer support for linux?

We all know the history of Apple. It clearly shows a trend to be open source, excepting for the licenses they share with Microsoft. In my personal case, I love open source because it has solved several of my problems. Just to share this with everyone, I am the network manager of a educational institution and I used to have my servers running on windows platform. Since we used to buy it all from Microsoft, they would give us free software for or labs, software like Visual Studio. They even assigned us engineers to plan everything for our servers, free of cost. Guess what? It was a disaster. We had our database destroyed by an external attack. We were “lucky” to have Microsoft in our servers and in our firewalls.
We had to take action, so I decided to switch to Debian, and to use IPCOP (a great dedicated firewall, if there is anyone interested, the link is: http://ipcop.org/ , please note, I am NOT affiliated with them, and I will receive no compensation or benefit if you chose to access it or not ). Both open source. The result, no external attack has been able to pass trough. After that, we switched most* of our e-learning platforms to open source, and guess what? We are saving over 60,000 yearly just in software. So for those who are looking for a good way to get good security without loosing an eye, try open source.
Now back to the point, I do not fully support any operative system. They all have their good features, or at least they should. The ones I know, are because I use them. My home network is composed by computers running in five different versions of Linux, two running in Mac OS X Tiger, and some others running in XP pro. My main computer is running in Ubuntu, and is really sad to see that there is no software from apple available for Linux. That is honestly the worst part of Linux, having no iTunes or QuickTime available. No way to see multimedia in the web, etc. A suggestion for apple would be, give support for Linux, there are a lot of us wanting the same.

Apple makes software and hardware. Therefore they
offer a total solution. Now they even can have
windows xp running on their hardware. Making a
version of mac os to run on linix isn't practically.
Under a mac is unix and you can run unix software
with the mac so you could do ever thing you are
doing with a mac.
I did not know Linux was one type of computer, like Mac...
Next topic, If I was willing to pay for it, this thread would not exist, because I can actually use a commercial software to adapt the windows web plug ins to Linux... If I was in charge of Apple, I would propose to develop free software support of my products, - plug ins and so - to other operative systems... But of course, even if I did, it would not be up to me. It would have to pass trough several layers of bureaucracy, and it would take a lot of time to be approved or rejected.
Anyway, the main issue is, the three most important OS's are Windows, Linux, and Mac. And that can't be denied. Now you can even run Windows in a Mac PC, and vice versa... besides being fancy, what else could I do with a Mac PC using Windows, when I can build a machine able to run Windows for less than 300 bucks? OK if you want to try a Mac in a i386 or a x86... but I still rather to be the proud owner of a PowerMac G5 than the owner of a Pentium 4 / AMD using Mac OS.
Also, I thought it would be fun to see the reactions and opinions of other people with this topic, hence, I was not expecting anyone from Mac to read it, and really do something about it, because I know they won't.

Is there a chance that Itunes could be written for linux support?

is there a chance that Itunes could be written for linux support?
i use fedora from RedHat and woul like to be able to use itunes on it

Unfortunately (or fortunately depending on your point of view), this is a user to user forum and no one here knows what Apple's plans for the future might be. Apple discourages us from speculating about such matters.
If I were to speculate about why they don't want us speculating, it's probably because, among other things, it would just end up encouraging a lot of semi-informed opinions (i.e. speculation).
But again, I'm just speculating so please don't quote me on that.
If you'd like to make your opinion known to Apple, submit the form at the bottom of this page:
http://www.apple.com/feedback/itunesapp.html
; - )

Dell Equallogic SAN HIT Kit support for SAP in Linux 11.2

Hello Everyone,
I would like to use an Equallogic SAN as storage in SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 11.2. Is the Equallogic SAN supported in Linux when using the HIT Kit to provide MPIO and snapshot support? The article from thorsten.staerk describes Equallogic SAN + Linux + native iSCSI (no mention of the HIT Kit). I understand that there are restrictions on using third party kernel modules.
My understanding is that the Equallogic MPIO driver will provide a faster, more efficient, connection to the SAN along with additional features.
References:
Playing with an Equallogic storage
http://scn.sap.com/people/thorsten.staerk/blog/2009/02/10/playing-with-an-equallogic-storage
Thorsten describes using Equallogic with SAP on SUSE Linux Enterprise
Thorsten uses native iSCSI drivers
How to configure Multipath using Equallogic Host Integration Toolkit (HIT) on Linux for Oracle
http://en.community.dell.com/techcenter/enterprise-solutions/w/oracle_solutions/3795.how-to-configure-multipath-using-equallogic-host-integration-toolkit-hit-on-linux-for-oracle.aspx
Describes using Equallogic multipath on Linux
Mentions that the Equallogic mpio is a combination of user mode and kernel mode binaries
Dell EqualLogic Host Integration Tools
http://www.dell.com/downloads/global/products/pvaul/en/equallogic-host-software-new.pdf
Host Integration Tools Overview from Dell
Support for CentOS 5.7, Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL) 5.7, 6.1 and 6.2, SUSE Enterprise Linux Server (SLES) 11 SP1
Dell EqualLogic Host Integration Tools for Linux
Installation and User's Guide Version 1.2.0
From the documentation "Installs a compatible prebuilt kernel module, if available. Otherwise, the installation script loads the Dynamic Kernel Module Support (DKMS) package and compiles the Dell EqualLogic-supplied kernel module."
EqualLogic Integration: Installation and Configuration of Host Integration Tools for Linux – HIT/Linux
The Dell EqualLogic HIT/Linux MPIO software consists of two components:
1. The EqualLogic Host Connection Manager daemon, ehcmd, which monitors the iSCSI session state and the configuration of the Linux server and PS Series group. Running in the background, the ehcmd daemon uses the Open-iSCSI management tool (iscsiadm) to add, remove, or modify iSCSI sessions to maintain an optimal number of iSCSI sessions. It also gathers information on the volume layout from the PS Series group.
2. A loadable kernel module, dm-switch, which implements a new Device Mapper target to the multipath devices. Based on the volume layout on the array members, the dm-switch module routes each I/O to the optimal path within the PS Series group.
SAP Note 784391 - SAP support terms and 3rd-party Linux
kernel drivers
The use of binary-only Linux kernel modules or drivers on the same server as SAP software is not recommended by SAP.
Thank You,
Kevin

I'll take a moment to provide an update on the solution. There were some issues with the initial configuration of the in guest iSCSI volumes. If I had to start from scratch, I would run all the storage through VMware. The last round of software updates appears to have resolved a potentially serious issue with iSCSI disconnects. iSCSI has run perfectly for two months now. I'll consider the issue resolved once I have six months without any iSCSI issues.
One remaining issue is that LVM won't initialize properly without implementing a custom init script. The init script work-around is simple and it works.
Configuration Overview:
VMware ESXi v5.5
Equallogic SAN (with v.7.0.3 firmware)
SUSE SLES v11.3
Equallogic HIT Kit for Linux v1.3

Oracle support for Weblogic 7 under LINUX

Hi,
Does anyone know what happened to oracle support in weblogic 7.0 for linux platform,
as it seems that the drivers are not included? Are there any discussions on that
topic anywhere?
thanks.
Zlatko

It DOES appear that there is support for WebLogic jDriver for Oracle on Linux:
see http://e-docs.bea.com/wls/certifications/certifications/redhat_linux.html#39532
The strange thing here is that, apparently, the Oracle drivers located @ lib/linux/i686/oci817_8/libweblogicoci38.so
and lib/linux/i686/oci817_8/libweblogicoxa38.so are "Type 2" ODBC drivers which
require an Oracle client to be installed on the WebLogic machine, but Oracle doesn't
support installation of the client on RedHat 7.2, which is required (according
BEA's doc) for installation of WebLogic 7.0. Can someone reconcile this apparent
conflict?
Laurent Goldsztejn <[email protected]> wrote:
Hi,
There is currently no support for WebLogic jDriver for Oracle on Linux
with WLS 7.0. Please check the following page for update on this topic.
http://www.weblogic.com/platforms/index.html#jdbc
Zlatko Mesaros wrote:
Hi,
Does anyone know what happened to oracle support in weblogic 7.0 forlinux platform,
as it seems that the drivers are not included? Are there any discussionson that
topic anywhere?
thanks.
Zlatko
Thank you,
Laurent Goldsztejn
Developer Relations Engineer
BEA Support

Wine Project looking for Photoshop CS users who want Linux support

If you're not a Linux user, or if you don't like the idea of
running Photoshop for Windows on Linux, you can stop reading now,
this message probably won't be interesting to you.
The Wine project is looking for hardcore Photoshop CS or 7
users who use Photoshop professionally, all day, every day,
and who are willing to tell us why they can't do that in Linux
using Wine yet.
We know everybody would like Photoshop CS3 or at least
CS2 support, but support for CS2 and CS3 isn't quite
ready, so we'd like to focus on our strengths, and support
Photoshop 7 and CS excellently. Don't worry, we're also
working on the CS2 and CS3 issues. Getting all the 7 and CS
issues taken care of builds a stronger foundation for CS2 and CS3.
If something doesn't work in Photoshop 7 or CS itself,
or your favorite plugin works in Windows with 7 or CS
but not in Wine, please let us know how to reproduce
the problem. To do that, just reply to this post,
or post in the wine-users mailing list,
or leave a comment in the wine appdb for Photoshop 7 or CS,
or file a bug in the Wine Bugzilla,
whichever you're more comfortable with.
We'll take it from there; if we can reproduce it, we'll
file a bug and see if we can get a wine developer to fix it.
Ideally you'd test with the latest release of Wine
(currently 0.9.51), but if you're still on a slightly older
version, don't sweat it, we'll retest on the latest for you.
Thanks!
Dan Kegel
Wine 1.0 Release Manager

Here's my original post the cnet article is based on:
http://google-opensource.blogspot.com/2008/02/google-sponsors-wine-improvements.html
Here's another post giving more details:
http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-devel/2008-February/062550.html
Here's the response of Adobe's Photoshop product manager:
http://blogs.adobe.com/jnack/2008/02/wine_offers_imp.html
Here's another nice writeup:
http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20080219-google-intoxicates-linux-users-with-wine-imp rovements.html
At the risk of repeating myself: I'm serious. I really want bug
reports from professional Photoshop users. Leave them here,
send them to the wine-users mailing list (see http://winehq.org),
or file one in our bug tracking system (http://bugs.winehq.org),
any of the three ways is fine.
Thanks,
Dan

New Linux distribution with support for VT-d on W520

I just released Centrych, which is a productivity oriented desktop. It's based on Ubuntu and has kernels that are optimized for desktop use.
Being a W520 owner, I've added a patch that allows you to enable VT-d in the 64bit version. It also supports UEFI, if you're interested in using that.
There's quite a few other features as well, the website is http://www.centrych.org.
Hope you like it.
Jack Radigan

I would recommend Ubuntu.
No OS is likely to have drivers for everything straight out of the box.
Even windows would need to have drivers supplied for some hardware if you were to reinstall with a retail copy of XP.
The oem distribution that comes installed on your notebook has these drivers installed already - that's the biggest part of an oem windows distribution.
For Ubuntu, typically you have to edit a line in a config file to make the sound work.
I had to also install the proprietary firmware for my wireless.
Both work great now.
The reason that you don't have mp3 capability in linux distribution is for legal reasons.
I'm sure someone here who is more gpl literate could give you chapter and verse on exactly why, but the bottom line is that you have to install support for certain av formats manually, usually by selecting the Restricted Extras package.
To my limited knowledge, that won't change with a different distribution.

[Comm] LinuxCertified announces support for Oracle Linux on its laptops

Hello,
LinuxCertified is pleased to announce that its Linux laptops are now available with Oracle Enterprise Linux 4 Update 4 pre-installed.
For more details, please visit: http://www.linuxcertified.com/
Thanks
LinuxCertified Team
-

user6029797 wrote:
•oracleasmlib-2.0.4-1.el5.x86_64.rpm -- I need this oneThis requires Oracle Linux support, as it is not GPL software and is only available to subscribers.
•oracleasm-2.6.18-164.el5-2.0.5-1.el5.x86_64.rpm -- I need this oneNo, you don't. This is built into the kernel for OL6U1.
Or does it mean that I must pay Oracle in order to be able to get these packages in order to learn ASM at home ??
Why would Oracle allow us to use their RDBMS/RAC/ASM/Linux software at home learning for free and not supply the above two packages??If you want to use ASM for free, install Oracle Linux 5 Update 7 and download the RHEL5 oracleasmlib package from here:
http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/server-storage/linux/downloads/rhel5-084877.html
Keep in mind that Database is NOT certified on Oracle Linux 6 anyway, so it is challenging to install. The very article you link to uses Oracle Linux 5. It also links to these very same RPMs. If you follow the article more carefully, you won't have any issues.

Support for 64 bit Linux

Hey macromedia/adobe
When can we have support for 64 bit Linux? The problem is
that most new hardware
is moving towards 64 bit architectures. We have a brand new
server, RedHat
Enterprise 4, coldfusion will not run on it.
Direct Contact: [email protected]

I couldn't agree more - it's insane that an enterprise
product isn't supporting x86_64 instructions in 2007.
On a more constructive note - does anybody out there have a
compiled connector for RHEL or CentOS 4.X, the 64 bit version? I
ask because I've found numerous pages on the web describing how it
works great for people after they compile it on their own. Well, I
can't get it to work. I have CentOS 4.4 x64, and I try to run this
script after successfully installing CFMX 7.0.2 by using the method
to sed out the checks for the right kernels, etc. Here is the
script I try to run inside the connectors/src directory:
/usr/sbin/apxs -c -n jrun20 -S
LIBEXECDIR=/opt/coldfusionmx7/runtime/lib/wsconfig/1/ mod_jrun20.c
jrun_maptable_impl.c jrun_property.c jrun_session.c
platform.c \
jrun_mutex.c jrun_proxy.c jrun_utils.c | more
/usr/sbin/apxs -i -n jrun20 -S
LIBEXECDIR=/opt/coldfusionmx7/runtime/lib/wsconfig/1/ mod_jrun20.la
strip /opt/coldfusionmx7/runtime/lib/wsconfig/1/mod_jrun20.so
All the paths are correct, and when I run it I get about 1000
warning lines from apxs about invalid characters and such in the .c
file. Good times.
Can somebody tell me how the hell to get this to work on 64
bit CentOS 4.x? I'm going crazy here... and Adobe - GET OFF YOUR
***** AND PLEASE ADDRESS THIS ALREADY. IT'S BEEN YEARS SINCE AMD
STARTED SHIPPING THEIR FIRST X64 BIT CHIPS.
This is approaching the no iTunes on Vista level of insanity
here....

Does labview for linux support 3D graphs?

I have a vi that is created on labview for windows and it has a 3D graph; now i would like to switch to labview for linux. I would like to know whether labview for linux supports 3D graph. Also is it possible to convert the existing windows based vi to linux?

Proces ENG wrote:
> I have a vi that is created on labview for windows and it has a 3D
> graph; now i would like to switch to labview for linux. I would like
> to know whether labview for linux supports 3D graph. Also is it
> possible to convert the existing windows based vi to linux?
No, the 3D graph in LabVIEW is an Active X control and therefore a
Widnows only feature. If the graphics are not to complicated you may try
to look into drawing your own 3D graphs into a picture control which
would work on any LabVIEW platform. Other than that you would have to
rely on external packages to do 3D graphics under Linux.
Rolf Kalbermatter
Rolf Kalbermatter
CIT Engineering Netherlands
a division of Test & Measurement Solutions

Promise 20376 Linux support for KT-4

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for