Promise SATA Raid 0+1 not available?

I'm looking at the manual that came with my 865PE Neo2.  It says that, using the Promise controller, I can have a 2 disk RAID 0+1 array.  
"Supports the maximum performance and creates a mirored (or fault tolerant) array (2 drives) for data security."
However, when I'm in the FastBuild Utility, I only get the options for Performance and Security.  I do not get an option for "Performance + Security".  
All the marketing material says this mobo supports RAID 0+1.  I just bought two brand new SATA drives to set this up.  What gives?

On the 865PE NEO2 FIS2R board to setup a Raid0+1 you need to connect 2-SATA drives to Serial3&4 and 2 IDE drives to IDE3.

Similar Messages

  • RAID Utility software not available in OS X Mavericks?

    Up till yesterday I have been using a RAID card in my Mac Pro (Mid 2010, 4 x 1 TB SATA, initially as RAID-5, now in a RAID-10 setup) under OS X 10.8.5 without any issues, and the RAID utility allowed me to check the status od me disks, event log, and the battery status / refresh cycles for the RAID card. Last night now I upgraded to OS X Mavericks. The upgrade went well, things appear to work OK, obviously at least half of my RAID-10 array is in use — however, I can't find the RAID utility, check the status of the RAID-10 system and the battery status of the RAID card. The disk utility shows the RAID set - but none of the underlying features (individual disks and their status, logs, battery) — am I thrown back to a soft RAID, and my investment into a RAID card has evaporated?

    Thanks a lot, Seliqui! the reason why I did not find it is that a) after the upgrade to Mavericks, the icon that I previously had parked in the dock no longer worked, and b) the new location for the utility can't be found anywhere on the Launchpad. I suspect both effects are an indication that they missed to add the new directory to the command path. I can hardly imagine that this was deliberate because if you have a RAID card you definitely want to have access to that utility — not just in case of a disk failure (I have had a couple of these!), but also in order to stop the user from doing things one is not supposed to do while the battery is reconditioning.

  • KT4 Ultra (6590) need update of the Promise SATA RAID Controller PDC20376

    The last Bios update AMI 1.4 for the KT4 Ultra (6590) have built in the bios version 1.00.0.18 for the PDC20376 (Promise 376).
    I can configure 2 maxtor (6E040T0) sata1 in a raid0 array and it works under WinXP SP3,
    but the 2 drives are working in UDMA5 according to the FastBuild Utility when the motherboard specifications talks about 150Mb (SATA1).
    It's not an OS problem because the FastBuild Utility at Bios startup show the UDMA5 mode for HDD.
    It's not a Maxtor 6E040T0 (SATA1) problem because have no jumper to set.
    The Promise support center don't provide support for built in raid controller but the responce was that it's related to a known bios issue of the controller, so i have to update.
    For the last Bios version for the S150 TX4 controller look at:
    http://promise.com/support/download/download2_eng.asp?productId=108&category=all&os=100&go=GO
    It's impossible to update the bios with the promise tool because the controller is integrated in the motherboard.
    I read for example than on the motherboard K7N2 Delta-ILSR the bios version of the Promise 376 controller is 1.00.0.21:
    https://forum-en.msi.com/index.php?topic=92756.msg665966#msg665966
    I think the only solution is a modding bios, where i have to replace only the Promise controller bios but:
    1) The tool amibcp.exe can't open the A6590VMS.140 AMI bios (renamed .rom), i don't know why!!!
    2) What promise controller bios rom file is good?
    Can anyone out there help . . . please ?

    This is my results compared to my other UDMA6 HDD on IDE1, HDTach long bench stop with "Read Error" and only quick bench works.
    The version of the Controller driver under WinXP-SP3 is 1.0.1.29 and I configured the driver in the PAM Utility with:
    "Driver Write Cache" enabled and "Write Back" as cache settings (The 2 Maxtor SATA1 in RAID have 2MB of cache, but i don't know How many cache have the controller!!).
    The Burst Speed is too strange!!! quick bench error?
    I made it so your image is clickable.
    -Frankenputer

  • Pt880 neo sata raid o corruption

    i have a pt880 neo with a celeron d cpu 2 raptors in raid 0 using onboard raid .
    runs great till i overclock , at 150 fsb raid array corrupts , using bios 1.5 .
    any ideas ? maybe promise pci raid card or another mother board?.
    what other motherboard chipset with on board raid will overclock.
    i chose the celeron d as it is suppose to be a good overclocker 3.6 gig ?.
    and i want to run the raptors in raid 0 for speed.
    the pci card raid will be slower than onboard?.
    thanks

    I am using a celeron d based on the prescott , power supply is raidmax 420 watt.
    i am certain that tha via sata raid controler can not handle the overclock it is not in the pci bridge and i don;t think it is or can be locked , used sata drives no raid same corruption at 150 fsb . when using pata drives no problems overclocks to 190 fsb today .
    i want to use the raptors in raid 0 , so what m/b with onboard raid sata will work?
    i don't want to change m/b only to have new one have same problem , also don't want pci raid runnig at 33mhz , whats the point , would like onboard raid that will allow overclock>?
    thanks for everyone help
    now help with selection of new motherboard.

  • K8N Neo Platinum nf3 250Gb SATA RAID question?

    Hi all I'm ready to make the move to an AMD A64 setup from my currnet P4.
    You all know what a tough job it is to find the right motherboard for an A64
    After much research I think the K8N Neo Platinum is the board for me, but there's one question I can't find an answer too. So I'm turning to this forum. Thanks much for any help.
    I currently run a dual RAID"0" setup. Two WD360 Raptors as boot array off the Si3114 on-board controller and two WD740 Raptors as a game \ power apps storage array off the ICH5R southbridge.
    My question is; Is it possible to run this drive setup off the K8N Neo Platinum's 4 SATA controllers? Two seperate RAID"0" arrays with one bootable.    
    thank you-Mike

    I decided to go with a S939 instead....I know me...and I'll want one as soon as I got the S754 up & running  
    I ordered a K8T NEO2-FIR...Its got the on-board Promise SATA RAID controller + on chip VIA RAID...so it should suit my drive needs perfectly

  • [Athlon64] Promise/SATA/Promise/RAID/Promise! What's it all mean?

    I've been reading up on some of the RAID information scattered around the Internet, and I've also been reading the booklets bundled with my MSI motherboard. My questions lean more toward the meaning of Promise and its various "forms" (?), and I think these booklets have left some holes.
    1) What are the major differences between Promise and VIA Serial ATA setups, other than the HDD LED light (not) functioning?
    2) Why does my BIOS allow me to select RAID/SATA from the Promise controller, when Promise is only one choice of Serial ATA setup on my board, as opposed to VIA? Why is RAID offered as an "option" with Serial ATA? (RAID is a way of utilizing the drive, SATA is the drive interface!)
    3) "Promise FastTrak 378" or "Promise SATA150 378" controllers...huh? Aren't they both Serial ATA capable? What about Via's controller? What's the difference between the two Promises?
    Basically, I'm confused with the rerferences to Promise. Thanks again...

    Hi, I'll try to create some clarity here...Promise is a manufacturer of controllers, both add on PCI card controllers and onboard controllers. Your board has 2 drive controllers, the VIA VT8237 Southbridge and the Promise Fasttrack 20378 controller. Both controllers handle SATA and IDE interfaces with hard drives. They both offer you IDE(-RAID) and SATA(-RAID) configurations. Some say the Promise works faster, some say the VIA works faster. Try for yourself to decide which works for you. Now, to answer your questions:
    1) The only difference is that the Promise controller is on the boards PCI bus. This might help during overclocking, because PCI frequency would be locked at 33 MHz. Your board doesn't overclock very well, so this is not that big a difference. On both controllers your HDD led should function normally.
    2) You can select various settings in your bios to match the installed hard drive configuration, so the controller knows what to look for. RAID configurations come in arrays: RAID 0 = striping mode, RAID 1 = mirroring mode, RAID 0+1 = 4 drives striped + mirrored, JBOD = just a bunch of discs installed. You can setup both controllers, VIA and Promise, in your bios.
    3) As mentioned above, you have two controllers: the Promise and the VIA. SATA150 indicates the interface (Serial ATA max. 150 MB/sec). This interface is newer than Parallel ATA (= IDE max. 133 MB/sec) and SCSI (various speeds, very fast). Now, there's also SATA2 (= Serial ATA max. 300 MB/sec). Don't mind all of these speeds too much, a single drive will not reach them.
    Hope to have made things a bit more clear...
       

  • Promise PDC20579 SATA/RAID controller

    I'm trying to get the piece of shit working with Linux, but haven't had any luck. I'm not sure which Promise add-on cards use this chip as this one is built into my mobo, where it provides 2-SATA and 1-PATA port. I'm using the PATA with 2 drives (160GB, 60GB) and I don't want to setup a RAID array, but just use it as an extra IDE controller.
    The BIOS detects the drives correctly but linux doesn't recognize the Promise controller, so it's not assigning device nodes for the drives (no hd* or sd*) and I can't seem to make it work. The correct kernel module, according to the net, is sata_promise, but I'm not certain it supports the PATA part of the controller. When loaded, it prints info about the connected drives to dmesg, but never assigns device nodes.

    Okay, so I found a patch in the Red Hat kernel mailing list that seems to work. It patches the sata-promise module to attempt to detect PATA ports when nothing is connected via SATA. I don't have any SATA discs so I cannot check to see if it breaks anything in regards to SATA.
    If anyone else is interested, I'll strip the RH specific stuff from the patch and submit it to the Arch kernel devs for review. Not sure if enough people would find is useful tho.

  • Promise 378 SATA Raid question

    Can someone tell me if my SATA drives are setup correctly given the details below?  The only driver that works is the FastTrak 378 (not the SATA 378 driver).  I want to make sure I am taking full advantage of my SATA drives.  In the Promise setup it shows them operating as "Mode U5".  What is this?
    Any help appreciated.
    My Drive COnfiguration is as follows:
    SATA Drives are on SATA3 & SATA4 (Promise 378 Controller)
    (as RAID 0 for performance)
    Primary IDE Master - Sony DVD/RW
    Primary IDE Slave - not used
    Secondary IDE Master - ASUS DVD ROM
    Secondary IDE Slave - ATA 133 Drive bay (Empty)
    3rd IDE Master&Slave - not used
    On Board Promise settings
    FastTrak 378 BIOS Ver 1.00.0.27
    2+0 Stripe - Functional
    HIT CTRL+F for setup and
    (in the setup it shows RAID 0 Drive Array as Mode U5)
    Bios Settings
    Boot Device Priority
    1 - Floppy
    2 - ASUS DVD ROM
    3 - BBS-0(RAID):FT 378 Ary 1
    On Board Promise IDE - As RAID
    On Chip ATA's Operation Mode - Legacy Mode
    ATA Configuration - PATA only
    SATA Keep enabled - no
    * PATA Keep enabled - no
    PATA channel selection - both
    * Combined Mode Option - PATA First Channel
    * SATA Ports Definition - P0-3rd/P1-4th
    * Configure SATA as Raid - no
    (where * is greyed out)
    Bios sees both DVD ROM & Sony DVD/RW
    Boot to CDROM
    Start Windows 2000 install
    F6
    "S"
    load Promise FastTrak 378 Controller
    Windows 2000 setup continues...

    Everything looks good to me. Like Danny said though, you will need to change Bios to "Native Mode" for the Intel controller if you ever intend to use the Serial connectors. If not you're fine.
    Also it's not clear from your post if you understand that you are using the 2 SATA drives as a Raid array. This gives you better drive performance but increases the chance of losing data. MAKE REGULAR BACKUPS.
    The Promise SATA drivers are for using the Serial1&2, IDE3 connectors with single/separate drives where Raid arrays are not used.

  • Neo2 BIOS 3.3 Disables VIA SATA Raid AND Promise IDE3 RESOLVED

    I recently corrputed my VIA SATA Raid installation of Windows by overclocking my FSB.  I have since read that you can't do this, and I definitely learned my lesson.
    But in the process of attempting recovery, I upgraded my BIOS from 1.8 to 3.3.  (I know, didn't really keep up on that  =)
    Now I have a strange problem.  I can't have both the Promise controller ENABLED as well as the VIA SATA enabled.  During boot, if the Promise controller is Enabled and has an IDE HDD plugged into it (important!) which was created by this Promise controller a few months ago, the VIA SATA section of BIOS boot does not show up.  It will not even show the text where it is looking for attached drives.  Herein lies the problem.
    Here are a few scenarios.  If I unplug all drives from the Promise IDE connector, but leave it enabled, it will proceed to the VIA section of BIOS boot right after the Realtek initialization.  It will also show the VIA section of the BIOS boot if I disable the Promise in the Integrated Devices section of the BIOS.
    But, if I leave a single drive connected to the Promise IDE connector, and have them both enabled in BIOS (VIA "On Board" is ENABLED and Promise is set to RAID) then the only boot options I see are the Promise section, where it will correctly identify the IDE drive connected to it (remember, it was made a drive by that very same controller chip a few months back) and then proceed to the Realtek initialization.  After that, there is no VIA section at all.
    Interestingly, if you hit DEL to go into setup anytime during the scenario where there is no VIA init section, the VIA SATA drives do not show up on the Boot Sequence at all.  It is like it is not there at all, which I suspected since it wasn't showing up during BIOS boot.
    SO.  This leaves me with the unfortunate scenario of not being able to use one or the other.  The only thing I can think of is that I updated my BIOS revision.  Please, is someone able to duplicate this, or is there a known workaround?  I would hate to lose half of the functionality of the mboard as far as additional controllers goes.
    I will add my config below just in case that helps:
    K8T Neo 2
    AMD 3500+
    2 x Kingston 3500 HyperX 512
    Antec NeoPower 480w
    2 x 36GB Raptors SATA (Drives I am attempting to run on VIA for boot)
    2 x IDE drives (Maxtor 250GB and WD 160GB) on the Promise IDE 3 channel (sometimes anyway  =)
    2 x CD ROM on IDE 1
    2 x IDE drives (WD 60GB and WD 120GB) on IDE 2 (I leave these unplugged during windows install and T/S'ing this problem)
    ATI Radeon X800XTPE
    I hope that is all you would need to know about the box.
    Thanks for your ideas.

    Quote from: Tiresmoke on 09-April-05, 22:52:31
    http://www.msi.com.tw/program/support/bios/bos/spt_bos_detail.php?UID=608&kind=1
    I trslly would suggest first though to do a Bios reset and then re-examine the problems if any and let's see if we can track and sort them out.
    The first thing I found odd is that you claimed to have updated the Bios from 1.8 and there is no version 1.8 for the Neo2's. Their Bios range starts at 3.0 and that is the lowest number you should have been at.
    Second let's take a look at your Bios settings. Typically when you flash a Bios you have to go back and reset the bios again to what is needed for your rig. Otherwise the default settings may not allow you to run your system at all properly.
    I appreciate your looking at this with me Tiresmoke.  You must be right on the previous BIOS version.  It is my original Neo that I am thinking of for 1.8.  Now that you mention that, I don't know what the previous BIOS version is, but I am now going to assume it was the original.
    Tracking through it though has been strange.  Another change I noticed is that my RAM would no longer run at DDR400.  It was stuck at DDR333 no matter what I did.  I had to move the Kingston 3500 that I had from 1/2 to 1/3 to get it to work.  Something must have changed in the BIOS update to make that happen, as it was running fine before that, and differences in operation at that level have nothing to do with whether I corrupted my RAID based windows install.
    The boot order is as follows:
    1)  Promise Controller (Press CTRL + F)
    2)  Realtek LAN Boot  (Press SHIFT + F10)
    >
    3)  VIA RAID Controller.
    It is #3 that will not show up if there is a drive attached to the Promise controller.  This has got me completely stumped.  Is there a direction we can go with T/S'ing this?
    Thx.

  • 865pe Neo 2 FIS2R, SATA RAID on Intel works but Single SATA on Promise dont???

    Hi Guys,
    Im sure this has been asked before so please forgive me but here goes.
    I have a 865PE Neo2 FIS2RMB, 2 gig ram, P4 CPU running XP SP2.
    On the MB's Intel SATA controller I have a Pair of WD Raptors in RAID0 array which works great.
    but I also want to put a 500gig SATA HD on the promise controller as a storage drive.
    I have spent 2 days trying to get it to work but no luck. If I enable the promise in the BIOS then my comp goes into a run bios then reboot cycle. I have installed the latest promise drivers from MSI but these are old anyway.
    This is driving me mad and I an going grey way before my time. Has anyone managed to do this and can anyone suggest anything?
    Thank you in advance
    Kenny

    Halo!
    Try to put old disk on SATA3 and SATA4 and add the new disk on SATA1 or SATA2.
    Go in the Native mode, put S-ATA and do not configure S-ATA as RAID.
    Do not forget to install Promise Fastrack 378 first from CD or Liveupdate on the Windows before you put them on Promise controller!
    I usually install everything on HD on Intel SATA them move HD on Promise and create RAID 1.
    Best regards, PiKo

  • RAID is not an option/not available/​missing in BIOS Storage Options?? HP Envy 700-047c

    Hello - I have an HP Envy 700-047c. It came with a 2 TB HD. I put in another 2 TB HD same model/type. The system in the BIOS and Windows 8 sees the new drive. However, when I boot and go into F10 BIOS/HP Setup utility, go to Storage menu, select Storage Options, my only option is SATA Emulation and the only 2 select options it shows are AHCI and IDE. This is where I should see RAID option - it is not there.
    I tried changing SATA ports on the motherboard - no help.
    I tried disabling Secure Boot and UEFI and chose Legacy - no help.
    I updated to latest BIOS for this PC - no help.
    I installed Intel Rapid Storage Technology software and can see the 2 drives within Windows but there is no create option on the Status page like there should be (because you need to enable RAID in the BIOS which the option is missing).
    I looked on the motherboard and don't see any jumpers that are labeled RAID (ie. some physical trip).
    I called Intel and they confirmed the Intel chipset I have is RAID capable but to contact HP to see if they turned off. I contacted HP and twice they said they are not trained in RAID and do not support it. I contacted the local Microcenter tech support and they found a link on this website talking about how to go to the area I'm in - but the RAID option is not there.
    Does anyone know how to get RAID enabled on this HP 700-047c in the BIOS/Setup utility? Help!

    UPDATE BY ORIGINAL POSTER TO BELOW - The below is not accurate about RAID being disabled on "All" HP home line computers per research from Big_Dave (Thanks!) - It is what I was told by the HP Escalation Team Friday however - not just my MB but all - which we are seeing is not correct per the customizable Envy model in the following post. It may just be certain models or just my current model's MB...?? I struck thru some of the detail, but leaving it mostly intact so others can see the misinformation I was given.
    Thanks for passing along. Below is what I found out about how RAID is disabled by HP now.
    I also had an email going back and forth with HP support and they sent to HP Escalation team who I ended up talking with yesterday who researched it for a day and found out that HP has disabled RAID on the motherboard for all of their home PC line! As we were thinking above. Only servers can do RAID now is the word.  Hard to believe they'd do that. The rep said he believed it had to do with people calling HP when they lost data due to setting up using RAID 0 and thinking that protected them (all it does is make a big disk, no redundancy like RAID 1). 
    To me that is no reason to turn off a feature of the Intel chipset. They also don't make this clear to any HP employee as no one I've talked to (3 now along with chat and email) knew that HP is crippling the capabilities of the MB and chipset. I even have a several year old HP Pavilion that has RAID enabled on it under my desk and has saved me twice from disk failure (running RAID 1 mirroring). 
    I'm pretty disappointed with HP decision to do this and that it's poorly recorded (in fact not recorded at all)  it so that I wasted hours upon days trying to figure it out with tech support people. If HP wants to remove a much needed service such as RAID it should be mandatory for them to disclaim that right in the Specfications sheet. RAID IS DISABLED AND CANNOT BE TURNED ON ON ANY HP HOME CONSUMER COMPUTER.
    Note: I even called AMI (American Megatrend, Inc.) with HP on the line who said they sold the MB to HP fully capable of RAID which is what led the escalation rep to research to whomever he talked to and found out HP is disabling it out the door to their unaware consumers.
    I also asked if HP tech team disabled it, would they be willing to send me a BIOS flash to re-enable it - ie. make that an option for those who are knowledgeable about RAID and can setup. The response was they probably won't. I pressed a little but didn't get anywhere - seems like a reasonable request to me/option to keep people happy.
    Luckily I'm within my return window and will be taking this computer back. Sad considering how much time I've put into it thinking I had a computer capable to do what I need.
    Anyway - please help spread the word so HP can get this into their knowledge DB and boards that RAID is GONE - removed purposefully by HP.

  • Intel(R) ESB2 SATA RAID Controller not working out of the box

    Dear all,
    I'm using, for my tests, an old server with a supermicro X7DBN Server motherboard.
    This motherboard comes with an embedded Intel(R) ESB2 SATA RAID Controller.
    When I try a native installation from the technical preview DVD it sees the RAID1 volume that has been created (2 disk mirror) but when I select it to proceed with the installation there is an unknown error stating that it's impossible to write to this disk.
    The same installation works perfectly with 2012R2 and the out of the box driver provided bin the install media.
    An update from the previously installed 2012R2 to the Windows Server Technical Preview also works without problem.
    It would make sens for MS to revert to the driver version embedded in 2012R2 for Intel(R) ESB2 SATA RAID Controller which is:
    Name : Intel(R) ESB2 SATA RAID Controller
    Date : 10.08.2010
    Version : 8.6.2.1025
    inf section : iaStor_Inst_RAID
    Device ID : PCI\VEN_8086&DEV_2682&CC_0104

    Hi,
    Thank you for the information. As you said from the behavior it seems that the build-in drivers of Windows Server Technical Preview will not work with the specific motherboard hence the RAID1 cannot work well. 
    I'll log the issue down. 
    If you have any feedback on our support, please send to [email protected]

  • Promise 20378 sata raid ide controller: this device doesn't start

     My WinXp Promise Fast Track 376/378 (tm) Controller doesn't start, despite installing the right drivers for vista and xp. Ik have a 40 gig Maxtor disk attached to the  IDE port of the controller aangesloten. Het Fast Track bios sees this disk correctly. The disk is o.k. since I can access its contents while running Linux Kubunty gutsy gibbon. What is wrong with the windows drivers? 
    My system:
    M/B = MSI KT6 Delta FIS2R
    CPU = AMD Athlon(tm) XP 1700+
    RAM = 1GB Twinmos M2G9016A-TT pc 3200 Cl2.5
    VGA = Ati Radeon 9600 series
    HDD = 2x Maxtor 6Y120M0 via raid-0, Maxtor 91303D6 IDE1 master, Maxtor 6Y060L0 IDE2 master, Maxtor 54610H6 promise IDE master
    PSU = Trust PW-5159 370W
    Optical = Plextor DVDR PX-504A IDE1 slave, Plextor CD-R PX-W121 0A IDE2 slave
    OSS = XP Pro SP2, Vista Ult., Kubuntu Gibbon 32bits, Suse 10.3 32 bits

    Quote from: Fredrik Åsenius on 14-November-07, 05:57:51
    Hello!
    Is SATA/RAID enabled in BIOS?
    Have you hit F6 during Windows installation, for allowing Windows Set-up to locate the drivers?
    If SATA/RAID was disabled, it wouldn't even appear in Device Manager
    If the RAID is secondary storage, then hitting F6 won't acheive anything as Windows is already installed
    You will however need to go into the RAID BIOS and create an array before you can use the RAIDed disks

  • K9A2 Platinum Sata Raid Problems

    I could not get my 2 500 gb seagate 7200.11 drives to work on the sb600 raid controller, in raid 1 (set to raid mode in bios).  I'd set it up and it would remain functional until I formatted it and put stuff on it. Then when I restarted, it says critical and can't locate the second drive, but it shows up in the list of definable drives.  My older 200 gb seagates 7200.9 in the same setup do not have this problem.  I finally got my 500s working by hooking them up to the promise controller instead.  (Although no longer a current problem, I wouldn't mind knowing what would cause this for future occasions.)
    My new problem is, I had to unhook all but the drive I wanted to install Windows XP on (A separate 120 JBOD configured drive) so I could get it to be C:/.  This all went fine.  However when I hooked up the 500s again, Windows XP would not boot, the screen just stayed black, with them not hooked up, it boots just fine, with the 200s as well.  When running the Windows XP setup again, the 500s appear as C:/ instead of the 120 in the disk select screen of the install.  It's like the 500s took over the drive letter when they are hooked up and thus can't load.  Is there some way to stop it from doing this or am I completely off on this.
    My computer spec is:
    K9A2 Platinum
    AMD X2 6000
    2*2gb OCZ PC6400
    ATI Radeon 3870
    700 Watt OCZ PSU
    Update: Installing XP ignoring the fact its not C: fails.  It copies all the files onto it, then after restarting I get a black screen.
    Another Update: On a whim I tried disabling the SB600 raid and set it to AHCI instead as I read that other people were having problems with it and it all works perfectly now.  It's too bad this doesn't work, but I'll just put the 200s back in my old computer instead.

    I'm having the exact same problem you did. Same Mobo. Except I started off with Promise RAID 1 because when I tried using SB600 RAID, my SATA DVD drive would not function in Vista Ultimate x64. So I had my Raid 1 configured on Promise T3 with BIOS 2.8.1030.0021 using 2 320GB drives. One of them Seagate, one WD, both 3GB/s transfer, only difference was that Seagate has 16MB cache, while the WD has 8MB. But both drives worked fine in the array for some time, and then after doing some updates from Windows Updates now the Raid config shows that encountered a critial status, "A disk member of an array has failed or is not responding", "Problem is detected with Array : 1". And when I go to the see the Array status it shows the Seagate drive on ID channel 1, but for the 2nd drive it shows questions marks all the way through the item line. I checked the drive, it seems fine. And even when I go to define a second Array, it shows the WD available on channel ID 3. So it definitely see both drives, but how do I re-add that WD drive that it doesn't see to my earlier defined array without loosing data on my Seagate drive?

  • First time install probs with sata raid drive using k7n2g ilsr

    hi all!!!
    this is the first time i have tried 2 use a sata raid hdd.  i dont use a raid drive for my c:, the raid drive is just extra space.
    first i formated my pc.  i installed the raid drivers, then xp.  my pc worked fine.  but then after a week it was time 2 try plug the drive in.  
    when i got my k7n2g ilsr motherboard i di not get a manual.  so with the raid drivers installed, i just pluged in the raid drive.  the drive seemed fine....  i formatted it and put a couple of games on.  but after an hours usage the games would crash (high pitched tone instead of the audio, then full freeze).
    i have tried putting these games back on my original drive and they work fine......
    anyway....
    i wanted 2 know if anyone had any ides what i was doing worng???  are there any settings in the bios that need changing when installing a raid drive????
    thanks for any help!!!!!!!

    ok still formatting drive.....   looking over the files on the msi site for my motherboard it has 2 files available for raid drives:
    the 'Promise Serial-ATA RAID Drivers' ( which i have installed)
    and the 'Promise Serial-ATA RAID Utility' (which i dont hav installed)
    do i need the Promise Serial-ATA RAID utility??  and if so how do i install it??  there are no setup files just dll files like the driver....  is istallation the same as the driver?
    again, i thank u for your help!!!!!

Maybe you are looking for

  • Back to my mac no longer working with iCloud

    Now that I have converted my mobileme to iCloud, back to my mac is no longer functioning properly.  As far as I can tell, my AEBS doesn't like my back to my mac login credentials, even though they are correct.  I can log in via settings on each compu

  • Issue with S_TABU_LIN

    Hi, I have implemented S_TABU_LIN object with Z Organisational level ( region specifc) to restrict access to few z tables at line item level. Usually before implementing S_tabu_lin , during execution of Z transactions a pop up used to come to select

  • Need help adding schedule to xcode 4

    I need help adding a tour schedule for an iphone app building an app for 13 djs and they want thier tour schedules added these need to be updated monthly is there a way to add this????

  • ECC6 and Portal connectivity

    Hi all, when i try to connect to the  portal  with my ECC6 account user, i can't, i filled UME, Abap tab with connection data. the user mentionnned on the portal is of COM type. created on ECC too Please help

  • HELP ME!!!! I NEED HELP!!!

    I won't lie, I jailbroke my iPod Touck 4G 5.1.1 and I really want to unjailbreak it, but when I try to restore it, it says "The iPod software update server could not be contacted. Make sure your network settings are correct and your network connectio