Promo Pricing Using DIMP for ORPOS v13.x

We have been successful in using DIMP for importing everything except for changes to promos. We can create and process the initial promo XML successfully and the prices ring correctly on the register. However when we try to do the following scenarios, we are at a loss as to how the XML should look like:
- End 1 item on a multi-item promo early
- Change the price of one item/loc on an existing promo
We have made the 'changetype' = UPD and DEL and the file is imported successfully by DIMP with no errors however nothing is updated in the database. The original promo still reflects all the same items and original promo prices. Below are the XML examples of the initial promo and then two examples of us trying to end/delete 1 item off the promo. We are confused over when a UPD or DEL changetype should be used and whether the FillType should be FullIncremental or DeltaIncremental.
Original XML for promo:
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<PricingImport
Priority="0"
FillType="FullIncremental"
Version="1.0"
Batch="1"
CreationDate="2001-12-17T09:30:47.0Z"
ExpirationDate="2027-12-17T09:30:47.0Z"
xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="PricingImport.xsd"
xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
<!-- Promo Price Change, Single store -->
<PricePromotion
ChangeType="ADD"
ID="027995159999"
PromoCompID="100001"
PromoCompDetlID="100001"
StartDateTime="2009-07-15T00:00:00"
EndDateTime="2009-07-30T00:00:00"
Type="NewPrice"
Priority="0"
TemplateType="Default">
<Name>Test Promo 1</Name>
<Description>Test Promo 1</Description>
<Item ID = "1900">
<Price>3.19</Price>
</Item>
<Item ID = "190007">
<Price>3.29</Price>
</Item>
<Item ID = "19001">
<Price>3.39</Price>
</Item>
<Item ID = "190010">
<Price>2.99</Price>
</Item>
<Item ID = "190013">
<Price>1.99</Price>
</Item>
<Item ID = "190016">
<Price>3.01</Price>
</Item>
<StoreID>00016</StoreID>
</PricePromotion>
</PricingImport>
Trying to remove/end 1 item on the promo using UPD as the changetype:
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<PricingImport
Priority="0"
FillType="DeltaIncremental"
Version="1.0"
Batch="1"
CreationDate="2001-12-17T09:30:47.0Z"
ExpirationDate="2027-12-17T09:30:47.0Z"
xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="PricingImport.xsd"
xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
<!-- Promo Price Change, Single store -->
<PricePromotion
ChangeType="UPD"
ID="027995159999"
PromoCompID="100001"
PromoCompDetlID="100001"
StartDateTime="2009-07-15T00:00:00"
EndDateTime="2009-07-21T14:30:00"
Type="NewPrice"
Priority="0"
TemplateType="Default">
<Name>Test Promo 1</Name>
<Description>Test Promo 1</Description>
<Item ID = "1900">
<Price>3.19</Price>
</Item>
<StoreID>00016</StoreID>
</PricePromotion>
</PricingImport>
Trying to remove/end 1 item on the promo using DEL as the changetype:
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<PricingImport
Priority="0"
FillType="DeltaIncremental"
Version="1.0"
Batch="1"
CreationDate="2001-12-17T09:30:47.0Z"
ExpirationDate="2027-12-17T09:30:47.0Z"
xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="PricingImport.xsd"
xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
<!-- Promo Price Change, Single store -->
<PricePromotion
ChangeType="DEL"
ID="027995159999"
PromoCompID="100001"
PromoCompDetlID="100001"
StartDateTime="2009-07-15T00:00:00"
EndDateTime="2009-07-21T14:30:00"
Type="NewPrice"
Priority="0"
TemplateType="Default">
<Name>Test Promo 1</Name>
<Description>Test Promo 1</Description>
<Item ID = "1900">
<Price>3.19</Price>
</Item>
<StoreID>00016</StoreID>
</PricePromotion>
</PricingImport>
Thanks for any help you can provide on this.

Good Afternoon Benecya,
There is a thrill of excitement when you are checking out and you find out that you qualify for a promotion or deal. The refer a friend program is a great and easy way to get your hands on some gift cards, so it’s disappointing to learn that the offer did not prompt back during your second attempt to check out after accidentally exiting the window.  
I would like to further look into this for you. I encourage you to log into the forum and select the option to send private message, send the message that includes the phone number that you are using to activate the Moto X 2nd Gen.
I look forward to hearing from you,
Karina|Social Media Specialist | Best Buy® Corporate
 Private Message

Similar Messages

  • Is the Promo Pricing of $10 Per Month for One App Considered an UPGRADE?

    I currently have Flash Pro CS5.5.
    If I sign up for Flash CC at the promo price of $9.99 per month, does that mean my CS5.5 license can no longer be used?
    Because if I cannot use Flash CS5.5 anymore and I paid $450 for it, getting a $10 savings for 12 months isn't worth it.
    A $120 discount for a $450+ program doesn't really seem like promo pricing?
    Am I missing something?
    Now if Adobe is being kind enough to allow CS users to purchase a single app for a discounted price of $10 per year as a courtesy for being a valued customer, that I could understand.
    I certainly hope someone can verify this by the end of the day as the $10 per month promo ends in a day or so.
    Thanks,
    Sean

    Hi Madclevr,
    Please consider this :
    Adobe Flash Professional CS5.5 (11.5)
    2011
    Flash Professional CS5.5 was released in 2011. It includes improved support for publishing iPhoneapplications, following Apple's revision of their iOS developer terms. Flash CS5.5 also contains several features to improve mobile app workflows across devices. Some examples are: Content scaling and stage resizing, copy and paste layers, sharing symbols across FLA files, symbol rasterization, incremental compilation, auto-save and file recovery, and integration with CS Live online services.
    Adobe Flash Professional CS6 (12)
    2012
    Adobe Flash Professional CS6 was released in 2012. It includes support for publishing files as HTML5and generating sprite sheets.[6]
    Adobe Flash Professional CC (13)
    2013
    Flash Professional CC was released in June 2013 as part of Adobe's Creative Cloud rebrand. Changes include a native 64-bit scene rendering engine, minor performance improvements and bug fixes, and the removal of legacy features such as ActionScript 2 support. As part of the Creative Cloud suite, Flash CC also offers users the ability to synchronize settings or save files online.
    Coutsey: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adobe_Flash_Professional 
    It is an upgrade. Flash pro CS5.5 can be still used.
    Reagrds,
    Rajshree

  • Which T code is used for entring the pricing condition P101 for purchase or

    which T code is used for entring the pricing condition P101 for purchase order

    Hi jitendra ,
    if you are looking for T-codes use:
    SE16 and scan table TSTCT.
    Regards Mario

  • Using SRM for very large contracts and contract management

    We are doing an SRM 7.01 implementation project. SRM will be used primarily for outsourced contract management. The contracts are all services associated with facilitites (plant) maintenance and also support services like cleaning or catering.
    They have very large numbers of items priced individually (e.g. 10,000) per contract. The items price depends on the location the work is expected to be performed. The location is represented in SAP RE-FX architectual object. The price can be priced at any level of the hierarchy e.g. service A is priced the same across the whole state but service B is priced per campus.
    q1. SAP advises that there are performance limitations on SRM contracts >2000 lines. Has anyone experience in a solution to provide very large contracts in SRM? How did you do it please?
    q2. SAP advises to use the plant to represent the location for pricing purposes, but this would result in a very large number of plants. Has any one experience in alternative solutions to for variable location pricing in SRM contracts please? I.e. like integrating the RE-FX architectural object or similar into contract and PO line items.
    thanks very much

    Hi Prakash,
    SRM does provide the facility of contract management with the help of Purchase Contracts and Global Outline Agreements but it is used as part of the sourcing for materials and services. The materials or services have contracts against some given target value against which PO is released. The contract is based on a material number ( eithe material or a service) which will be used as a source of supply during the creation of the Shopping Cart. It might not really fit in the scenario of carrier and freight forwarders but still can be customized for this kind of use.
    The contract management functionalities in the R/3 space can also be looked on for this purpose.
    Reg
    Sachin

  • How to setup USE Tax for USA

    Hi guys
    We recently got new scenario where we need to calculate USE Tax for interstate purchasing scenario.  Basically the interstate vendor is tax exempt but we need to accrue and remit to government ourselves.
    Just looking for some tips for the setup.  I guess a new Tax Code is required but what about pricing procedure? (this tax is not added to PO total as we do not pay it to vendor.
    We use TAXUSX procedure for USA.
    Any help with experience is greatly appreciated.
    AC

    It is generally advised to use a external tax engine for calculation of US Use and Sales tax because tax is calculated based Ship to Ship from locations and if a product is taxable or not. Within US tax is caluclated for multiple levels like state, city, town and county. Only external tax systems can handle such complex split. If you have a very small business then you can also configure TAXUSJ tax procedure which is jurisdiction based. you need to assign the %age for every jurisdiction.  I still say that use external tax engones like vertax, fabware or Sales tax office. External tax systems use TAXUSX tax procedure.

  • Use Pages for template to commercial printer

    I created a 20 page, 7x7", perfect bound book in Blurb.com which is primarily pictures with a small amount of text.  It has generated a lot of interest since it is very specific to the area in which I live.  A local business wants to stock it and claims it can sell "tons" which is appealing.   The problem I have is getting the unit price down to a reasonable amount.  Even buying in bulk from Blurb I am paying about $8 a unit.  I'm exploring commercial printers and if the pricing seems reasonable I will need to transfer the book to a non-proprietary software.  Pages is an obvious contender but I'm wondering if folks can share their experiences using Pages for this type of project.  I have Photoshop Elements but that seems cumbersome.
    Any comments are appreciated.  Thanks.

    To print your book commercially you will need to reproduce the color faithfully and with all bitmap elements at 300dpi.
    Frankly that is difficult to do from Pages which is designed to print to a users' desktop printers and renders certain parts of the output at 72dpi when exported to pdf which is the usual format for commercial printers.
    1. See if you can find a commercial printer who will accept a Pages file to run through their RIP directly
    2. Always talk to your printer about what they require and what is achievable
    3. Commercial offset works off a different price structure than digital printing. Much of the cost is up front and the greater the print run the more the price comes down. Find out how many books you'll have to print before you beat the $8 you have been quoted by blurb.
    4. As compensation commercial offset, when done correctly, is markedly better quality than digital
    5. Please please please don't use Photoshop Elements or Photoshop they are not DTP software and rendering all your vector objects and text as bitmaps is such a bad idea that of course everyone is doing it now
    Peter

  • Slaes pricing using simulation version

    Hi experts,
    Is it possible to create sales pricing using simulaton version project ?

    Hi Ravi
    Thanks for your response
    Please look at the link http://help.sap.com/saphelp_erp60/helpdata/en/0b/ba853488601e33e10000009b38f83b/frameset.htm
    There is an illustration which depicts that,
    - Project P1234/version 0001 --> Project 1234 --> Project P1234/Version 0002 --> Project P1234
    As per this illustration, the project number remains same.
    As you said, the transaction CJ20N is not allowing me to transfer the simulation version to operative project.
    But, i am experiencing a dump error while trying to transfer simulation to operative in CVJ4.
    At the conclusion, i mean to say that irrespective of transaction code, this may be allowed.
    Please comment.
    warm regards
    ramSiva

  • I had previously installed the trial adobe cc illustrator which expired months ago, can i re install on a month by month rolling contract so I can just use it for a month??

    I had previously installed the trial adobe cc illustrator which expired months ago, can i re install on a month by month rolling contract so I can just use it for a month?? please help

    Hi munzafeedback,
    I have checked your order registered under your email ID posted here, it has a muse single App CC purchased on September 23rd 2013,
    You have not yet activated it, the billing date is 23rd of each month(you will be charged on this date irrespective of the fcat that you are using it or not).
    Incase you do not want to use it now, please get it cancelled as it is within 30 days of purchase.
    If you plan to cancel it after 3o days of purchase, the subscription will attract cancellation fee .
    Please go through the cancelation detail at :
    http://helpx.adobe.com/x-productkb/policy-pricing/membership-subscription-troubleshooting- creative-cloud.html
    Regards
    Rajshree

  • Best reasonably priced macro lens for a 70d

    Hi i have got a canon 70d and have just started doing alot of macro photography (Flowers bugs etc) i've been using the the 18-135mm kit lens but now i know im enjoying it im going to get a mocro lens. Cant afford nothing to major as saving for wedding and house. Was just looking for some advice on reasonably priced macro lenses. Any Advice welcome..
    Thanks in advance
    Darren 

    amfoto1 wrote:
    Actually, it's hard to go wrong with macro lenses... Most give excellent image quality, so it tends to be the other features that are deciding factors. I have no idea what you consider "reasonably priced".... To one person that might be no more than $100, while to another it might be anything under $1000.
    Canon EF 50/2.5 Compact Macro is currently about $270... As an EF lens, this can be used on both your crop camera and on full frame cameras. But this is a micro motor focus drive lens (slower, hunts more), and on it's own it only goes to 1:2 or one half life size magnification. To get full 1:1 magnification with it, there's a separately sold converter that costs another $270. You also could use macro exension tubes - that sell for between $70 and $200 for a set - to increase the lens' magnification. All the other macro lenses listed here are able to do 1:1 without need for any adapter. 50mm is fairly short focal length, putting you relatively close to your subject. This lens' closest focus is about 4 inches (with 1:1 adapter... compare to 12 inches with a 100mm lens). Personally I use shorter macro focal lengths mostly in-studio where they can work well.... but prefer a longer focal length in the field. Uses 52mm filters. No lens hood offered or supplied, it doesn't really need one because the front element is deeply recessed into the lens.
    SIgma 50/2.8 Macro lens sells for about $350. I don't know much about this lens, it's been around for a while. I know it's 1:1 capable, both crop and full frame capable and has a micro motor focus drive. Comes with a lens hood. Uses 55mm filters.
    Canon EF-S 60/2.8 USM Macro is on sale at the moment for $420. It's an EF-S lens, which will work fine on your 70D, but is not usable on a full frame camera. USM focusing drive is a bit faster, quieter and more precise (see below about focus speed). It's full 1:1 capable, a little longer focal length than 50mm, but not a lot. It's relatively compact and it is "internal focusing" or IF, which means it doesn't change length when focused. It uses 58mm filters and the matched lens hood sells separately for $24 (third party hoods are available for less).
    Tamron  SP 60/2.0 "Di II"  Macro/Portrait lens is selling for about $525 and, like the Canon 60mm Macro, is a "crop only" lens. Fine for your 70D, but not usable on full frame cameras. It's also IF, but using a micro motor type focus drive. I've been working with one of these lately, giving it a try. I find it's focus slower than Canon USM, but generally plenty fast  for most macro/portrait usage. The main attraction of this lens is its f2.0 aperture... fully a stop larger than most other macro lenses (Zeiss makes a couple f2.0 macro lenses, but they are manual focus only and quite expensive). This is nice particularly when using the lens for portraiture. It uses 55mm filters and comes with a lens hood.
    Canon MP-E 65mm is not a lens I'd recommend to anyone just starting out shooting macro. This is an ultra high magnification lens... actually can do no less than 1:1 and goes as high as 5:1. That's a range well beyond what many people shoot. It's also about $1000 and stricly manual focus. It's a superb lens, usable on both crop sensor and full frame cameras, and one I use personally. But it's still not something I'd recommend to anyone just starting to shoot macro. It's rather challenging to work with, pretty much a "tripod only" lens.  Comes with a tripod mounting ring, uses 58mm filters and an odd little lens hood sells separately for around $40.
    Sigma 70mm f2.8 EX DG macro lens.... is another I don't know a whole lot about. Like their 50/2.8 macro, it's been around a long time and uses a micro motor type focus drive. It is the first lens in this list that has a Focus Limiter (2 ranges), which is a feature that can be helpful speeding up auto focusing. It sells for about $470, uses 62mm filters and comes with a matched lens hood.
    Tamron SP 90mm f2.8 Di is another excellent design that's been around a long, long time. I've still got and use manual focus versions of this lens dating back to the 1980s. The currently available micro motor version sells for $500 and, as a Di lens is usable on both crop and full frame cameras. It's got a focus limiter (2 ranges),  uses 55mm filters and includes a matching lens hood. It is not an IF lens.
    Tamron SP 90mm f2.8 Di VC USD is an updated version of their venerable 90mm, now with both an improved AF system (USD is similar to Canon's USM) and image stabilization (Tamron calls it VC). It is said to be better sealed against dust and moisture, and also uses an aperture with 9 curved blades to make for smoother background blurs. This lens is Internal Focusing (IF), has a Focus Limiter (4 ranges!), was introduced within the  last year or so selling for about  $750, uses 58mm filters and comes with a matched lens hood.
    Canon EF 100/2.8 USM is another excellent lens I use personally. This is the older version of this lens without IS (and not L-series, but you would be hard pressed to tell any difference in build quality, comparing it to some L-series such as the 180/3.5L macro). A key feature here is that it can optionally be fitted with a tripod mounting ring.... something that's not possible with most of the other lenses mentioned here. For macro work, I consider a tripod mount a very important feature, though some of the smaller lenses might be fairly usable on a tripod without one. This lens has USM focus drive, is IF, has a Focus Limiter (2 range), sells for about $550 presently, and uses 58mm filters. A matched lens hood is quite large and sells separately for about $40.  Tripod Ring B to fit it sells for about $140 (there are cheaper third party hoods and tripod rings).
    Canon EF 100/2.8 L IS USM is a newer model that primarily is upgraded with the addition of Image Stabilization (IS). Now designated an L, it includes a matched lens hood. Like the older model, a tripod ring can be optionally fitted. It has an improved Focus Limiter (increased to 3 ranges). It uses 62mm filters and is currently on sale for $900. Tripod Ring D sells for $172 (cheaper 3rd party ring is avail.).
    Tokina 100/2.8 ATX is both crop and full frame compatible and sells for about $400. I haven't used it, but it's another venerable design that's been around for a lot of years.  It has a Focus Limiter (2 range), uses 55mm filters and comes with a matched lens hood. I don't believe it's IF.
    Sigma 105/2.8 OS HSM  is currently on sale, heavily discounted, for about $670. I suspect Sigma is about to introduce a new version and that's why they are blowing out the current model with a large instant rebate. It is both crop sensor and full frame camera compatible. The current version has OS, which is Sigma's version of image stabilization, as well as HSM which is similar to Canon's USM focusing drive. This lens has a Focus Limiter (3 ranges), uses a 9 blade aperture, 62mm filters and comes with a matched hood. It cannot be fitted with a tripod ring.
    Canon, Sigma and Tamron all offer longer macro focal lengths... 150mm and 180mm. In general I'd say those are pretty long to use on a crop sensor camera such as your 70D or my 7Ds. They all come with tripod rings, which is good because longer macro lenses can be difficult to keep steady. But they all are also considerably more expensive, so I won't go into the details about them.
    Regarding auto focus speed... All macro lenses with AF are slower focusing for a couple reasons. One is that they have to move their focusing mechanisms a long, long way to go all the way from infinity to 1:1 magnification. Another is by design, they use "long throw" focus mechanisms that emphasize accuracy over speed, which is necessary because depth of field can be quite shallow at high magnifications. So, in general, don't expect a macro lens to offer the same AF speed as a non-macro lens with similar focus drive mechanism. What can help a lot are the type of focus drive and if the lens offers a Focus Limiter. Canon's USM, Sigma's HSM and Tamron's USD all will give faster focusing than micro motor drive systems on other lenses. Properly used, a Focus Limiter can really speed up focusing performance, too.
    When shooting macro, auto focus speed usually isn't all that critical. In fact, I often just focus manually. Accuracy often is more important, due to the shallow depth of field. So AF perfomance might be a bigger consideration if planning to also use the lens a lot for non-macro purposes.
    Image Stabilization (Canon OS, Sigma OS and Tamron VC) is offered on a few premium models. Canon's is a special hybrid version developed just for macro purposes, which most feel is a bit more effective than other forms of stabilization. Nikon actually was the first to put stabilization (they call it VR) on a macro lens, but most agree that while it's useful for non-macro shooting, it is of little practical assistance at 1:1 magnification. The Canon hybrid IS is considered to be a bit better at higher magnifications, but even it will be of limited effectiveness at 1:1. In other words, there may be times when you want to use a tripod or at least a monopod. And in those cases, particularly on some of the larger lenses, a tripod mounting ring can be a very nice thing to have (among all the above, only the Canon 100mm macro lenses can be fitted with a t'pod  ring).
    There are other options to "do macro", too. For example, you could simply get some Macro Extension Tubes to use with your current lens, to make it focus closer. Canon offers quality individual tubes in 25mm and 12mm lengths ($84 and $140 respectively). Kenko does too, but also offers a set of three that includes 12mm, 20mm and 36mm lengths (set sells for $200).  The Kenko are very close to the Canon in design, quality and performance.
    There are also less expensive sets (under $100) from Zeikos and Opteka. The Zeikos set includes 13mm, 21mm and 31mm and sell under a bunch of different brand names (Vivitar, Bower, Dot Line, ProOptic and many more). The Opteka set was just recently introduced and includes 12mm, 20mm and 36mm. All these sets are more plasticky than the Canon and Kenko tubes, but they do support autofocus and direct control of the aperture.
    AFAIK, all the currently sold macro extension tubes for Canon mount are compatible with both EF and EF-S lenses. (If you were shopping used you'd have to be careful because some of the older tubes were EF only and could not be used with your EF-S 18-135mm lens).  
    Canon's TS-E 45mm and TS-E 90mm lenses also are usable for near-macro and, with extension tubes added, macro shooting. These are Tilt-Shift lenses that give additional control over the plane of focus which can be used to good effect with macro and shallow depth of field. I use a TS-E 45mm a lot for table top studio shots of small products. However, these are manual focus only, largely tripod-only and rather pricey lenses, so I just wanted to mention them here. They are probably not something I'd recommend for a first time macro shooter or general purpose, outdoor, walk-around macro work.
    Personally, my two most-used macro lenses are a Canon EF 100/2.8 USM (the older model) and a Tamron SP 60/2.0. When I'm planning to shoot a lot of outdoor, walk-around macro shooting, the Canon lens is my first choice. However, it's rather large so when I'm not planning macro, but want to have a macro lens just in case, I'll substitute it with the much more compact Tamron lens. (Which also can replace two portrait lenses in my camera bag, so reduces my load by one lens serving in place of three.)
    Another key consideration is flash. Often when shooting macro it's a challenge to get enough light to allow a stopped down lens, desirable ISO and adequately fast shutter speed. So you probably will find yourself wanting to use flash sooner or later. Canon offers two macro-specific flashes: the MR14 EX Ring Lite and the MT24EX Twin Lite. I use both for different purposes. I prefer the Twin Lite for macro shots up to about 1:1, maybe 2:1 (double life size) magnification. The Ring Lite I mostly use for very high magnification shots with the MP-E 65mm lens.
    All the Canon lenses above have provision for, or can be adapted to allow for direct mounting of the two Canon macro flashes (Note: I believe there is a new "Mark II" version of the Ring Lite coming out soon). There also are adapters available to mount these flashes on non-macro Canon or onto third party lenses. It also is possible to use a single "standard" flash, along with an off-camera shoe cord and some sort of diffusion to hold back the flash, when shooting macro. I do that often with 550EX and 580EX II flashes.
    There are other macro-specific accessories you may want to consider eventually. Often I'll use a diffusion panel and/or a reflector when out in full sun, to reduce too extreme contrast and help fill too-deep shadows. A focusing stage is another useful thing, when shooting macro with a tripod.
    Finally, I recommend you pick up some books on macro photography. John Shaw's "Close-Ups in Nature" is perhaps the "Bible" among them and likely the most comprehensive. I also found books about macro by Tim Fitzharris and Joe & Mary MacDonald very helpful and interesting. I'm sure there are others, but those came immediately to mind.
    Alan Myers
    San Jose, Calif., USA
    "Walk softly and carry a big lens."
    GEAR: 5DII, 7D(x2), 50D(x3), some other cameras, various lenses & accessories
    FLICKR & PRINTROOM 
    Almost 2,400 words to answer a macro lens post? Alan, nobody can believe you can write so much (except TCampbell, ha ha) but you risk nobody wanting to read. See the link that follows for the sort of difficulty readers have with this sort of post, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Too_long;_didn't_read

  • Pricing of Keynote for Mac

    Hello there!
    I have been using the Mac mini (late 2012 model) for a year or so, and after upgrading to OS X Yosemite, I am really enjoying the performance and everything. One thing that I fail to understand is the pricing of Keynote for Mac. At the October 16th event, it was mentioned that the iWork Suite of Apps would go free for Mac users from that day onwards. However, after about 4 days, the Mac App Store still says "9.99$" for Numbers, Pages and Keynote.
    It most certainly must be a misunderstanding on my side, but it would be of great help if somebody can help me out with this.
    Cheers!
    -Devoted iSheep

    After many hours of dealing with the same problem I was able to find a fix that worked for a client of mine. Make sure your Mac has a name.
    Apple menu (top left corner)
    System Preferences
    Sharing (third row)
    Make sure that you have something filled in for the computer name. Normal convention is Jon's MacBook Air or somethign similar.
    Close the window (there is no save button)
    Try linking your device again.
    Message was edited for clarity

  • HT2589 We have purchase 5 apple minis and would like them all on one account.  That way we can monitor the use of these units.  they will be used strickly for a business application.  can I use one account in itunes or must i have multiple.

    We have purchased 5 apple minis and would like them all on one account, that way we can monitor the use of these units.  They will be used strickly for a business application.  Can I use one account in itunes or must i have multiple.

    Not going to happen the way you want it to.
    When you add a gift card balance to the Apple ID, it's available for the Apple ID.
    Probably best to create unique Apple ID's for each... this will also make things easier in the future as purchases are eternally tied to the Apple ID they were purchased with.

  • I want to use wifi for Apple TV, but it doesn't prompt for a password, so never connects.  What am I missing?  Can I only use it via a non-password-protected wifi connection?

    I want to use wifi for Apple TV, but it doesn't prompt for a password, so never connects.  What am I missing?  Can I only use it via a non-password-protected wifi connection?

    Hi - you might want to post this question on the Apple TV area - you would probably get a quicker response - if you have a specific question relating to Apple routers then post back here

  • Error while generating DDL commands using startSQLRepository for a new Repository

    Hi,
    I am trying to generate DDL Commands using startSQLRepository for my new repository SubashRepository so that I can use them to create new table structure.
    All the repository related changes looks good. i can see my repository in ACC
    When I run the command:
    startSQLRepository -m SupremeATG –repository /com/supreme/SubashRepository /com/supreme/subashRepository.xml -outputSQLFile C:/ATG/ATG9.3/SupremeATG/config/com/supreme/subashRepositoryDDL.txt
    I get following error:
    Table 'SUBASH_MEMBER' in item-descriptor: 'member' does not exist in a table space accessible by the data source.  DatabaseMetaData.getColumns returns no columns
    Note:
    * errors related to definition file were cleared as the same command threw relevant exception while trying to store a array property with out creating a multi table.
    * Now this is the only exception i see
    * Some DDL are getting generated in the output file, but those are related to inventory repository (I am not sure why this is happening as I have specifically gave the path to my definition file).
    Any help in resolving this is highly appreciated.

    Pl post in the ATG forum

  • I can not send email from my iPad .  Have been using it for over a year, all of a sudden I can only receive email.  I have a wifi connection in my home and have a A T &T cellular data plan?

    I can not send email from my iPad .  Have been using it for over a year, all of a sudden I can only receive email.  I have a wifi connection in my home and have a A T &amp;T cellular data plan?

    I have a 1st gen iPhone that I just updated the software to 2.0.2
    Now whenever I press the mail icon it goes to the mail app for about 4 seconds, does nothing, no loading of folders, old messages, nothing.
    Then it reverts back to the home screen. Tried restarting, haven't tried restoring, thought I'd look here first.
    Anyone???

  • I'm using Word for Mac. Though there are various instructions on the Internet for modifying the templates, none make sense to me. They instruct to do something I can't follow. I change a template but can't save it to the template folder.

    What the ****.
    OK, I try to change a template using Word for Mac version 14.3.4 2011 edition.
    I make a change to the template but am unable to save the darned thing to the template folder; it asks for a file name like it's a new document. I want to change the blasted template but if I can't save it as a modified template, I've accomplished nothing.
    Does anyone have a solution?
    Thanks

    Support for Microsoft Office for Mac

Maybe you are looking for