Pros and Cons of Customer Specific Screens with Screen Exit????????????????

Hi Experts,
                I am using Screen Exits for Notification.
                I want to know what are the Disadvantages of using screen exits for notification.
                Earlier we had Runtime error because of the Screen Exits used anyway we had rectified the problem. Anyway before going for next Screen Exits please tell me if any problems I would likely to face because of screen exits.
               Thanks in advance.
NArendra

Narendra,
If they are programmed correctly, then you shouldn't have any problems.
However, you may need to create some new ABAP reports.
PeteA

Similar Messages

  • Pros and Cons of using JBDC Adapter with XI

    Hi Experts,
        Can somebody help me understand pros and cons in using different JDBC adapters with XI?
       I would be really greatful to you.
    Thanks & Regards
    Gopal

    Hai,
    Go through the links:
    /people/varadharajan.krishnasamy/blog/2007/02/27/configuring-jdbc-connector-service-to-perform-database-lookups
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/44/f565854b7341e6e10000000a1553f6/frameset.htm
    Regarding JDBC Adapter in SAP XI
    Configuring File and JDBC adapters
    Thanks,
    Rajani.

  • Pros and cons of creating a table with key

    Hi Folks
    I have some tables where there is no key defined in the source system. What is the best way to build such tables. In my case the source system is Teradata.
    I have 25-30 columns in dimension and what is the best way to load this data where there is no.
    What will be the Pros and Cons if I have a table without a key  or if I create a table with 25-30 keys.
    regards
    Poonam

    I recently purchased a Mac Mini and am using it with my TV.  Here's what I found:
    Using the HDMI connection on the Mac Mini, the image on the TV is very harsh.  It's very bright, high contrast and garish colors.  I did a lot of testing and am convinced this is due to the HDMI Display Profile in OS X Yosemite.  I could not find any way to change the display profile in the Mac Mini as long as HDMI was the connection.
    Using the miniDisplayport/Thunderbolt connection on the Mac Mini, with the Apple miniDisplayPort-DVI adapter and a DVI-HDMI cable the picture is perfect.  (Note, however, that this connection only carries video; if you want audio you will have to use a separate cable to connect the Mac Mini audio line out port to your TV's audio line in port.)
    That said, the larger the TV the less quality you will have displaying text.  I suggest using a 21" or smaller TV as a monitor if you will be doing text work.
    My setup is with a 40" Sony Bravia 1080p HDTV and the primary use is for video (concerts, movies, Skype, etc), not office apps.   As I said earlier, the picture is perfect - brightness, contrast, colors, resolution are as nice as I could ask for.

  • What are the pros and cons re using an intel iMac vs MacPro with LP8?

    I'm considering getting a new intel Mac in the near future (presuming a new MacPro will be released in the near future - maybe at the same time as Leopard). I compose largely for film and television and I am composing largely using a combination of loops, software instruments and some recorded live performance. I usually sync to a low res quicktime movie.
    I do like the idea of a simple and uncluttered work environment with an iMac, added to which there's also a degree of portability with the iMac however the MacPro is obviously more powerful. I'm not sure how much the difference in power between the two computers would affect me.
    Would I be compromising myself much if I went for the iMac over the MacPro? What are the pros and cons of the iMac vs the MacPro in relation to Logic Pro 8?

    In the world large-scale music composition using samples, loops, etc (especially for film) your two biggest needs are RAM and HD speed/access. The imac looses big time in this department (as a single computer at least) as it can only be upgraded to 4gb ram, and only holds one internal HD, and also lacks any PCI expansion for DSP cards, audio interfaces, etc.
    In generalyou want to separate your data vs applications as much as possible, to ensure both can be accessed quickly and easily by the computer. So its best to have your system software / applications on one internal HD, and your logic data (samples, audio recordings, loops) on another drive(s). You can do this with an iMac via USB, FW800, & FW400, but depending on how big your projects get, how many USB and FW drives / interfaces you use, and how much data you need to stream, you could overload the buss on the imac (not sure if it has multiple busses or not). Plus speed wise, internal SATA are much faster than external drives, and the mac pro with its 4 internal slots seems like a great choice for speed and flexibility.
    However, if you dont find yourself doing large scale projects, then you might be better off going with an imac. We just purchased one for my father and it runs great! It blows the socks off of my Dual 2.5 G5 tower in terms of CPU speed! If you run into problems running things from the imac, you could always add a mac-mini down the road to stream sample libs, as a Logic node, etc, which seems to be a much more cost effective solution.
    I hope this was helpful, but I probably just made the decision harder . In fact, if I were to start over today, I dont know if I'd go with a MacPro, or an iMac / mac mini combination. they both seem to have their advantages / disadvantages.
    Best of luck!

  • What are the pros and cons of running iTunes from an SD card with a Retina MBP?

    Hello,
    I'm thinking about getting a Retina MBP, but I think the default storage of 256GB is way to small to be used as a main computer and the upgrade to 512GB is very expensive. I was thinking of ways to reduce bulky files and was considering running iTunes from an SD card. Does anybody have any experience with doing this, what pros and cons did you discover?

    I wouldn't even try storing multiple iTunes libraries on SD cards. Better idea - what I do - is store the majority of my music on an external hard drive and just my 'must have' tunes on my internal SSD. I have a 512GB SSD and use around 170GB for iTunes. On my external drive, I had about 440GB in tunes (last time I checked).
    You can 'switch' libraries by holding down the option key when you launch iTunes. It's the best of both worlds - storage for on-the-go, must-haves, and an entire library of "all" of my music.
    256GB should be plenty of space - I just store so much music on my internal SSD because I can!
    Clinton

  • What are the pros and cons of using people keywords, given that my catalogue is already uptodate with regular keywording of all subjects?  e.g., will the people keyword transfer to other programs?, can I use the same name for a people keyword and regular

    What are the pros and cons of using people keywords, given that my catalog is already up to date with regular keywording of all subjects?  e.g., will the people keyword transfer to other programs?, can I use the same name for a people keyword and regular keyword in the same photo?

    What are the pros and cons of using people keywords, given that my catalog is already up to date with regular keywording of all subjects?  e.g., will the people keyword transfer to other programs?, can I use the same name for a people keyword and regular keyword in the same photo?

  • Pros and cons in setting AD domain trust into my AD domain for more than 10+ AD domain and some with same FQDN or label ?

    Hi,
    Can someone please share what is the pros and Cons of trusting AD domain for more than 10 different AD sites into my existing single domain forest let say ParentCompany.com ?
    At the moment I only have one single forest AD domain with the Domain and Forest functionality Windows Server 2003. The main domain controller FSMO role holder is in the Data Center spread across three different VMs running on Windows Server 2008 R2.
    The main/parent company has acquired smaller business chain of 15+ offices in which they have their own Domain Controller and also their own domain, sometimes they also got the same AD domain between them (no trust or whatsoever in those 15+ AD domain).
    Sounds crazy but yes, there is no standardization in them or whoever manage their IT infrastructure previously.
    I'm now considering what are the benefits of creating the AD domain and trust versus importing those AD objects into my domain and then decommission them.
    No need to worry about Exchange Server since all of the user in those sites connecting to the RDS to my ParentCompany.com terminal servers.
    My requirements or goal are as follows:
    1. Simplify the AD domain structure & maintenance
    2. Try to avoid the disruptions of the user in terms of downtime and selecting multiple different domain everytime they login to their PC or SharePoint sites.
    any kind of help and suggestion would be greatly appreciated.
    Thanks.
    /* Server Support Specialist */

    Can someone please share what is the pros and Cons of trusting AD domain for more than 10 different
    AD sites into my existing single domain forest let say ParentCompany.com ?
    I think you mean 10 AD domains.
    Managing multiple domains can be difficult for administration. I usually recommend using a single domain in a single forest with OUs to separate resources whenever it is possible.
    However, if you can't do that then you can simply create trust relationships between your domains. The advantage is that you can enable access to resources to different domains. I do not see cons here.
    The main/parent company has acquired smaller business chain of 15+ offices in which they have
    their own Domain Controller and also their own domain, sometimes they also got the same AD domain between them (no trust or whatsoever in those 15+ AD domain). Sounds crazy but yes, there is no standardization in them or whoever manage their IT infrastructure
    previously.
    I'm now considering what are the benefits of creating the AD domain and trust versus importing those
    AD objects into my domain and then decommission them.
    I would recommend consolidating your domains into a single one. ADMT is a migration tool that you can use. The advantage would be the ease of administration. Also, by having multiple DCs for the same domain across sites, you will take benefit of High Availability
    of your and DRP.
    This posting is provided AS IS with no warranties or guarantees , and confers no rights.
    Ahmed MALEK
    My Website Link
    My Linkedin Profile
    My MVP Profile

  • Mouse 4 and marks - pros and cons with Mavericks

    Hello,
    I'm pretty new to mac but have had computers for many many years. However I've bought the latest iMac maxed out.
    Pros and cons:
    Pros: It's an Apple product. It great really and I love it. The only wonder I have is why they made the computer thinner and didn't install a true desktop graphic card in there. I guess it's because they don't want people to buy that computer instead of Mac Pro.
    Cons:
    1. I've been searching for a way for go back in a browser faster without trackpad/magicmouse. There is only thirdparty programs that I have to pay for that support Mouse 4, for example. Still don't understand why Apple have chosen not to support this. Atleast allow me to just drag the window like we do on the iPhone. Right now I have to either click the back button or right click and chose "Back".
    2. When I'm in my Videos folder or any type of folder really. Let's say I have a folder with 10 movies in it. I open one, watch it and then close the player. I then can't see which video I just watched. The only way to see this is either to remember the videoname or open all videos again until I find it. In Windows, the video/file will be marked so I know which file I just watched.
    3. iCloud service are very nice, but still a little hard to understand how it works. If I transfer all my pictures from my iPhone to my iMac using iCloud and then delete them all from my phone. Will they disappear on my Mac too? Since the systems are synced?

    Send Apple feedback. They won't answer, but at least will know there is a problem. If enough people send feedback, it may get the problem solved sooner.
    Feedback

  • Pros and cons of using email sending package in oracle 8.1.6

    hi ,
    i would like to know the advantages /disadvantages of using email sending package from oracle 8.1.6
    compared to sending the same using say perl or php.
    iam developing a site in php/oracle8.1.6 , in which iam supposed to create a payement module.whenever a user
    register(for free trial or subscribing the site) i'll have to send him a welcoming mail.In addition to this iam also supposed to find out wether subscribers are paying cash at right time and if not send them reminder mails and other for related scenarios . i can do the same in Perl or PHP.but if iam not gaining much(say based on server performance or load) then i think i can go ahead with oracle package. when i tested it i found that its slow . what about the load that it may cause for the server (ours is linux ).
    please do give inputs on this

    Hi Ravi,
    Thanks for your reply.
    But I am specifically looking at pros and cons for web services. So the thread which you passed to me won't help.
    Regards
    Nitin.

  • SOAP vs RFC - performance and pros and cons

    Hi,
    I have been playing around with the SAP .NET Connector 2.0 between an ASP.NET 1.1 application and SAP passing in either SOAP or RFC connection strings to the proxy classes as a proof of concept for some integration work required for our existing customer website and teh SAP system replacing our legacy applications.
    Other than issues relating to the ports that need to be opened in Firewalls between application environments can anyone provide me with any information or point me in the direction of any documentation regarding the performance differences between and pros and cons of using these two protocols?
    The impression I get is that RFC performs better than SOAP due to the XML conversion overhead inherent in using SOAP calls.
    I know that the ESOA direction of SAP means that SOAP is the desired protocal in the long run but is there any reason why one should be used in preference to the other in the scenario menttioned above?
    Sorry if there is an obvious answer and thank you in advance for any help.
    Andy

    We did a lot of load tests to find answers on how the protocol can have impact on the performance. With our test systems RFC was about 3 times faster than SOAP and the network traffic was doubled with SOAP (approx.). And it seems to me that RFC offers more parallel processes (for multithreading application), but I'm not hundred percent sure on that point.
    We used rel. 640 with Web AS, Client was .NET Connector and ERPConnect with .NET 1.1 and .NET 2.0.
    Krishtan

  • Pros And Cons of Subforms and Groups?

    Does anyone know of any pros and cons related to how things are grouped, either via an object group or a subform? Are there any specific reasons to use groups and not subforms - subforms and not groups?
    For those who care to know a little more, not just questions...
    In designing my forms I have taken this approach:
    Groups (created by selecting Layout > Group) - I use groups for grouping simple objects (Text, Lines, Rectangles, etc.) which build the "static" portion of the form.
    Subforms (created by drawing, or "wrapping" objects together) - I use Subforms for field objects (Text Fields, Numeric Fields, Decimal Fields, Check Boxes, Radio Buttons, Date/Time Fields, etc.) which act as the "live" or "dynamic" portion of the form.
    I like this way of organizing the objects. It seems to make "sense" at least to me, and it also helps in terms of aligning objects, and so on. However, of course, it is not necessary to segregate the objects this much. So what is the preferred or recommended method? All opinions or suggestions are welcome!

    Actually, there's a big difference between using groups and subforms to relate objects to each other although if you don't use any scripting and/or data binding, you probably wouldn't notice much difference.
    Once you get into scripting and/or data binding, the use of groups and subforms makes a significant difference because groups (which are actually <area> XFA objects) are "invisible" when it comes to scripting and data binding.
    This means that if, on a page, you had 4 text fields, each named TextField1/2/3/4, and TextField1/2 were grouped while TextField3/4 were wrapped in a subform (named "Subform") and you needed to access these text fields from the context of the page, you would do:
    TextField1 OR TextField2
    because they're grouped with an <area> tag which is transparent in the Object Model. If, on the other hand, you needed to access the 3rd and 4th text field, you would do:
    Subform.TextField3 OR Subform.TextField4
    because subforms are defined in the XFA Scripting Object Model.
    The use of groups and subforms also affects data binding. That is, it affects the way XML data imported into your form is used to populate values of fields. For instance, if your data looked like this:
    <data>
    <TextField1>1</TextField1>
    <TextField2>2</TextField2>
    <TextField3>3</TextField3>
    <TextField4>4</TextField4>
    </data>
    and your form had TextField1/2 grouped into a group named "Group", TextField3/4 wrapped into a subform named "Subform" and then another TextField3/4 which were siblings to the Subform and Group objects but placed
    prior to the Subform object in the object hierarchy, importing the above data into the form would populate TextField1/2 in the Group object and TextField3/4 which are siblings to the Group and Subform objects -- not TextField3/4 which are wrapped in the Subform object.
    Now let's say your data was as follows:
    <data>
    <TextField1>1</TextField1>
    <TextField2>2</TextField2>
    <Subform>
      <TextField3>3</TextField3>
      <TextField4>4</TextField4>
    </Subform>
    </data>
    This would result in populating TextField1/2 in the Group and, as opposed to the first scenario, TextField3/4 which are wrapped in the Subform object.
    This is a very simple example to prove a point. If you think about it a little, the implications -- especially concerning data binding -- are quite large. To help illustrate this further, I've attached a sample form with the hierarchy I described earlier as well as two data files: data1.xml is the first one I described in this post, while data2.xml is the second one. Try importing both into the form to see the differences in the results and then compare the object hierarchy in the Hierarchy palette with the nesting of the data nodes in the data files.
    Finally, there's also the fact that subform instances can be created and deleted dynamically at runtime while groups cannot have instances. For dynamic forms, this is a big consideration.
    Stefan
    Adobe Systems

  • Neptune for UI development Pros and Cons

    Hi ,
    we are evaluating neptune for UI development for what are the pros and cons of using neptune.
    i see only that webdynpro abap developer can be easily moved to neptune , some javascript knowledge is still required.
    some question
    1) can neptune make calls to odata services ? do that requires code in javascript or ABAP
    2) any accelerators provided by neptune  like for workflow scenarios , list and details .
    3) can sap standard fiori apps extensibility  or modification is possible through neptune
    4) security if its accessing business functionality directly
    regards
    Yashpal

    Hi Yashpal,
    I will give you my view, but as Robbe says I work for the company and other SAP developers like DJ Adams has other development tool preferences than me ( I call his Sublime Text development spaghetti coding and he sees Neptune as a crutch that restricts a developer's freedom but this is just a friendly point-of-view discussion and I have promised him a beer in Walldorf next time our paths cross there)
    So the important message is that SAP has opened up their platform for different development tools and it is now a choice for the individual developer or SAP customer. This is a fantastic move by SAP and I think a bit overlooked by the community, Look at the new Xamarin partnership as an example (and yes they are a competitor, but I did mention them )
    Now the pros of Neptune are in my opinion:
    ABAP developer friendly development (removed 90% of JavaScripting needed)
    Connected to the SAP transport System (Software Logistics as is)
    Drag Drop designer that gives structured code (easy for a new developer to take over code, compared to the spaghetti provided by DJ <-  I'll need to buy a few extra beers for that remark)
    Native json communication provided by the Neptune Server (you can argue all you want about Odata, our solution is more flexible gives incredible performance and superb and easy to use offline capabilities)
    Integration with Adobe build, use an SAP program to generate hybrid apps  (The average ABAP developer does not install cordova and build hybrid apps - with Neptune he/she does)
    Integration with SMP. Automatic connection with the REST API's of SMP both on-premise and in the Cloud
    Reduced time to market. One of the largest SAP implementation partners in the Nordics stated that Neptune reduced development time by 80%
    Free templates (Advanced templates such as fully functional PM, HCM, SD templates are available Experience | Neptune Software  <- sorry for the marketing but you did ask)
    UI5, all of the other third-party tools (Not SAP tools like App Builder, Eclipse etc) uses non UI5 frameworks. I personally believe that SAPUI5 (UI5) is the future of SAP UX and thus it only makes sense to keep a common and future-proof framework.
    Network crunching. We optimize all networking. Which makes sense for mobility.
    no extra infrastructure needed - it is a certified add-on and takes 15 mins to install.
    Works with most versions of SAP. We even have alot of customers using 4.7 (we need the ICF so nothing lower). This is something the community often forgets. Yes it is cool to play with the latest Netweaver release, but do our customers have that installed?
    Cons (woot!)
    Cost, even if Neptune is very affordable it still requires license for productive usage (free for developers though - and hey we need to live as well ) So custom coding  is cheaper in respect to license (but not in TCO in my opinion)
    Generated code, even if we have added as much freedom to code custom JavaScript as possible there will always be restrictions in generated code compared to notepad. (But I haven't met an issue that couldn't be solved by custom coding in the Neptune Application Designer yet)
    Other backend systems. Neptune is based on ABAP and as such it obviosly works best with an ABAP backend.
    .... (Add stuff from other non Neptune ppl )
    Regarding your questions:
    1. Yes you can use Odata, best way is to consume it on the ABAP level, but you can of course consume it through JavaScript as well (Not recomended by me)
    2. Yes see above (free templates and also premium templates by our partners)
    3. No you can't modify a fiori app with Neptune, but the two solutions work perfectly together (You can add Neptune apps in the Fiori launchpad) One of our partners have created an RDS solution based on both Fiori and Neptune.
    4. Neptune is an add-on to Netweaver and as such has no extra security in itself beyond that (And we seek not to do that). But we support any security you wish to add on top. I strongly advice having a look at the SAP Secure offering (App protection and MDM)  as well as SMP (also the new Cloud edition which gives easy affordable protection for your backend)
    So that was my very biased answer
    Njål

  • 2.5 GHZ and 5GHZ Pros and Cons

    What are the pros and cons of 2.5 Ghz and 5Ghz spectrum
    My customer wants 1240AG and the antenna for those are either 2.5 GHz or 5GHZ and wants to know which spectrum is better for him to use
    Regards
    Anuj

    My customer wants 1240AG and the antenna for those are either 2.5 GHz or 5GHZ and wants to know which spectrum is better for him to use
    802.11b is long range, high penetration value but at a cost of low speed, amount of channels anyone can use.  The worst side of 802.11b is that some industrial applications, such as hand-held barcode scanners only talk in the low 802.11b data rates.
    802.11a is short range, low penetration value and high speed with 12 channels to use.  The bad side is that not alot of applications use this bandwidth.  In Australia, for example, some expensive laptops only have 802.11b/g/n radios.  Only netbooks have 802.11a/b/g/n radios.
    You want a good spectrum to use?  Use 802.11a.  But judging with the fact that you are going to use 1240, then choosing 802.11a is a moot point.

  • Leading ledger can be local GAAP? Pros and Cons. 1 company code scenario

    My client /the company uses 2 GAAPs: local GAAP and IFRS.
    I have read that "the leading ledger is based on the same accounting principle as that of the consolidated financial statement. It is integrated with all subsidiary ledgers and is updated in all company codes (if posting is not ledger specific)."
    If we have only 1 company code can we have local GAAP as the leading ledger? What are the pros and cons?
    Arjan

    Hi,
    Local GAAP must be a leading ledger because country you are operating your business will require wide reporting like financial statements, tax registers, stock registers. So, primary posting will be related to your local GAAP which will be directed to both leading and non leading ledger. If there are certain things which are required to be altered then you can post the differences exclusively to the non leading ledger using transaction FB50L.
    Keeping Local GAAP as non leading ledger will require huge posting of adjustments.
    Regards,
    Chintan Joshi.

  • Error code text file or Error ring, pros and cons of each

    I'm looking for some community input on the pros and cons of using either the Error Code Text file, or the Error Ring for creating custom errors in an application.  My question comes about as a result of this post.
    I've used the Error Rings exclusively in the past to avoid the extra maintenance steps of bringing the text file along with the LV project and source control.  I assumed the error information was simply converted to ring constant.  But with my linked post above, I'm wondering how deep my mistakes may cut me.
    Please weight in on this with pros/cons, , and any past experiences that may be helpful.

    Actually Hooovahh and Jeff are right. As you can see in that way you can prioritize the error that you need to read or in other case ignore. In the same time you can create the error that you want.
    In this link in the last interaction they upload some pictures where you can see the way for make.
    http://forums.ni.com/t5/LabVIEW/Error-Ring-changing-code-number/td-p/3152761/page/2

Maybe you are looking for