PS/CC across partitions?

I purchased the PS/Lightroom special a week or two ago. At the time I was running OSX Mountain Lion exclusively. Today I partitioned my drive in order to cleanly install OSX Mavericks on it. I was hoping I could use PS cross-partition but when I went to launch it I was refused and got an "Error 16" message.
Am I attempting the impossible? Does PS have to be on the system drive in order to work? Will I be able to re-download the apps onto the Mavericks partition?

Mmm, no. While I'm glad to know about the CC Cleaner Tool, this doesn't seem to answer my question. Let me ask it a different way:
Is it or is it not possible to have PS reside on the OSX Mountain Lion-driven partition (where I had downloaded it) but use it while running on the OSX Mavericks-driven partition?
This was not a reinstall. I had only subscribed to PS/CC about a week and a half ago and had no problems with it in Mountain Lion. It was only when I added a Mavericks partition and tried running PS from that system while it remained installed on the Mountain Lion partition.
ab

Similar Messages

Re: Pointers across Partitions...For YourInformation

At 09:41 AM 12/3/97 -0500, Sivaram S Ghorakavi wrote:
Hello Folks,
This is just FYI.
My application has got a Server Partition, with a Service Object as aninteraction to a wrapper in 'C' for a DLL, and a Client Partition, which
basically access the SO on each user interaction. The most of the functions
in 'C' code expect "pointer to char/pointer to structure etc.,". My
application CRASHES by declaring the pointers and allocating the memory and
passing them from client to server partition. But if I pass the forte data
values, like TextData etc., to the SO and let that do the CASTING of the
values and passing them to the methods on the Server Partion makes my
application HAPPY.
>
Rule of Thumb: Never pass the pointers across partitions. Pass the fortedatavalues and let the other partitionon handle them.
>
Regards,
Sivaram S Ghorakavi mailto:[email protected]
International Business Corporation http://www.ibcweb.com/
Actually, this makes a lot of sense when you think about it.
First, a little about pointers. As most of you probably know, a pointer is
simply a variable (usually a long, in C++) that holds a memory address
where the actual data that you are interested resides. In other words, the
pointer "points" to the memory location of the data.
Imagine an application running on some networked computer (call it "Machine
A"). This application has a partition (call it "Partition 1") that is
using some data stored in memory location 123456. In Partition 1, a
pointer variable ("P") has the value "123456", thus P "points" to the data.
Now lets pass P to another partition ("Partition 2") running on another
computer (call this "Machine B"). Remember, P really only contains the
value "123456". When it is accessed by the code in Partition 2, the
application would actually be looking for data in memory location 123456
***on Machine B***! Clearly, this is a violation and would cause all kinds
of problems.
In this respect, Forte doesn't differentiate between partitions running on
different computers vs. partitions running on the same computer, so it
raises an exception whenever a program tries to pass pointers across any
partition boundries.
Passing objects is different, however. Most of you know that Forte uses
what is called "copy semantics" when passing objects across partition
boundries. This means that, while to the developer it may appear that an
object received from a remote partition is the "same" object as the one
that was passed by that remote partition, it is actually a copy - a
physically different object containing all of the same state information as
the original object. Thus, the "address" of an object doesn't really come
into play across partition boundries.
I'm not going to take the time to explain here how anchored objects work,
but they are really object-based, not pointer-based, as well.
Viola! Mr. Ghorakavi's rule of thumb explained!
James Urquhart [email protected]
Product Manager phone: (510) 986-3513
Forte Software, Inc. fax: (510) 869-2092

Maybe, just maybe, you can use gparted to move the excess space in your new partition which is above your existing partition size after first identifying it as swap. Then move it to the end of the drive, leaving space for a new partition which is the same size as your existing partition.
That, maybe, will accept the dd transfer since the partition size is identical. After all is done, delete the swap.
I hope I made sense.....

Does hash partition distribute data evenly across partitions?

As per Oracle documentation, it is mentioned that hash partitioning uses oracle hashing algorithms to assign a hash value to each rows partitioning key and place it in the appropriate partition. And the data will be evenly distributed across the partitions. Ofcourse following following conditions :
1. Partition count should follow 2^n logic
2. Data in partition key column should have high cardinality.
I have used hash partitioning in some of our application tables, but data isn't distributed evenly across partitions. To verify it, i performed a small test :
Table script :
Create table ch_acct_mast_hash(
Cod_acct_no number)
Partition by hash(cod_acct_no)
PARTITIONS 128;
Data population script :
declare
i number;
l number;
begin
i := 1000000000000000;
for l in 1 .. 100000 loop
insert into ch_acct_mast_hash values (i);
i := i + 1;
end loop;
commit;
end;
Row-count check :
select count(1) from Ch_Acct_Mast_hash ; --rowcount is 100000
Gather stats script :
begin
dbms_stats.gather_table_stats('C43HDEV', 'CH_ACCT_MAST_HASH');
end;
Data distribution check :
Select min(num_rows), max(num_rows) from dba_tab_partitions
where table_name = 'CH_ACCT_MAST_HASH';
Result is :
min(num_rows) = 700
max(num_rows) = 853
As per the result, it seems there is lot of skewness in data distribution across partitions. Maybe I am missing something, or something is not right.
Can anybody help me to understand this behavior?
Edited by: Kshitij Kasliwal on Nov 2, 2012 4:49 AM

>
I have used hash partitioning in some of our application tables, but data isn't distributed evenly across partitions.
>
All keys with the same data value will also have the same hash value and so will be in the same partition.
So the actual hash distribution in any particular case will depend on the actual data distribution. And, as Iordan showed, the data distribution depends not only on cardinality but on the standard deviation of the key values.
To use a shorter version of that examle consider these data samples which each have 10 values. There is a calculator here
http://easycalculation.com/statistics/standard-deviation.php
0,1,0,2,0,3,0,4,0,5 - total 10, distinct 6, %distinct 60, mean 1.5, stan deviation 1.9, variance 3.6 - similar to Iordan's example
0,5,0,5,0,5,0,5,0,5 - total 10, distinct 2, %distinct 20, mean 2.5, stan dev. 2.64, variance 6.9
5,5,5,5,5,5,5,5,5,5 - total 10, distinct 1, %distinct 10, mean 5, stan dev. 0, variance 0
0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9 - total 10, distinct 10, %distinct 100, mean 4.5, stan dev. 3.03, variance 9.2
The first and last examples have the highest cardinality but only the last has unique values (i.e. 100% distinct).
Note that the first example is lower for all other attributes but that doesn't mean it would hash more evenly.
Also note that the last example, the unique values, has the highest variance.
So this is no single attribute that is controlling. As Iordan showed the first example has a high %distinct but all of those '0' values will hash to the same partition so even using a perfect hash the data would use 6 partitions.

Directory Links across partitions are not allowed.

See a lot of this in the crawl log - what is this error?
it's the http://<portal><documents>/Forms/Allitems.aspx
No external is crawled in that content source
how do I fix it ?

Hi,
Based on your description, my understanding is that you got an error that "Directory Links across partitions are not allowed".
For your issue, change the content source to crawl the individual BDC applications instead of the entire catalog:
Here is a similar post, you can use as a reference:
https://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/72a51853-50a8-4062-8d50-8b38d9ecd0d3/directory-links-across-partitions-are-not-allowedwhen-crawl-external-data-source?forum=sharepointsearch
Here is a possible solution, refer to it:
http://blogs.technet.com/b/speschka/archive/2013/02/04/resolving-the-directory-links-across-partitions-are-not-allowed-error-when-crawling-odata-bdc-sources.aspx
Best Regards,
Lisa Chen
Forum Support
Please remember to mark the replies as answers if they help and unmark them if they provide no help. If you have feedback for TechNet Subscriber Support, contact
[email protected]
Lisa Chen
TechNet Community Support

RE: passing UserWindow across partitions

The "partition" reference is a red-herring. What I mean is, the fact
that you are running across partitions has nothing to do with the error
you are receiving. Consider the error. It says either one of two
things is going wrong. Either:
#1) You are trying to serialize a pointer, or
#2) You are trying to send a pointer across a partition.
You are, most manifestly, NOT receiving an error saying "serialized data
cannot be sent across partitions." In your case, the correct
interpretation of your situation is error #1). That is, you are trying
to serialize a pointer (indirectly).
In short, I have tried to do what you are doing, and the unfortunate
answer to your problem is: you cannot serialize a window. Since the
window contains pointers, and pointers cannot be serialized, windows
cannot be serialized. Sorry...
From: [email protected]
To: [email protected]
Subject: passing UserWindow across partitions
Date: Tuesday, February 25, 1997 4:43PM
I'm trying to pass a UserWindow object as a parameter to a method on a
service object in a separate partition. The idea is to be able to store
the window object on a server and retrieve it (and display it, etc.)
later
from a client. Works great in test mode, but when I run it in
distributed
mode, I get the error:
Attempt to serialize a pointer value or to send a pointer value
between
partitions. Values of type 'pointer' can neither be serialized nor
sent
from one partition to another.
I'm guessing this has something to do with the UserWindow.window
attribute
having attributes that are pointers to system-specific resources. For
what
it's worth, it doesn't work even if I haven't opened the window yet. In
other words, the following code causes the same error:
tempWin: someWindowClass = new();
myServiceObject.takeThisWindow(tempWin);
Has anyone ever tried this kind of thing before and succeeded?

Maybe, just maybe, you can use gparted to move the excess space in your new partition which is above your existing partition size after first identifying it as swap. Then move it to the end of the drive, leaving space for a new partition which is the same size as your existing partition.
That, maybe, will accept the dd transfer since the partition size is identical. After all is done, delete the swap.
I hope I made sense.....

Passing UserWindow across partitions

I'm trying to pass a UserWindow object as a parameter to a method on a
service object in a separate partition. The idea is to be able to store
the window object on a server and retrieve it (and display it, etc.) later
from a client. Works great in test mode, but when I run it in distributed
mode, I get the error:
Attempt to serialize a pointer value or to send a pointer value between
partitions. Values of type 'pointer' can neither be serialized nor sent
from one partition to another.
I'm guessing this has something to do with the UserWindow.window attribute
having attributes that are pointers to system-specific resources. For what
it's worth, it doesn't work even if I haven't opened the window yet. In
other words, the following code causes the same error:
tempWin: someWindowClass = new();
myServiceObject.takeThisWindow(tempWin);
Has anyone ever tried this kind of thing before and succeeded?

There are 2 ways to do it:
1. Use session varible to store information. If the
kind of information to be stored in each page is more
forget this option.
2. Use an object to store the information. Share this
object in each JSP page.
Hope it helpsI like option 2. If you use a JavaBean, not only is it fairly easy to set and get the date, you can also serialize it or store it in XML so the user could log-out and come back later, and the app could remember the user's values...

Accessing an iTunes Library across Partition

Hi, I am running a Macbook pro with bootcamp and 64 bit Windows Vista. I have my iTunes library fully stored on the Vista Partition, but I would like to be able to access all of this data on the Mac Partition without making copies of everything. Preferably I would like to transfer over all my iTunes library information as well. (Playlists, etc. I got this all off my old PC fine.) Also I should note that my Vista drive is NTFS, but I have both MacFUSE 3g-NTFS and MacDrive thus read and write problems should not be an issue. Any help would be greatly appreciated.

Open the iTunes preferences, click on the Advanced tab, turn off the option to automatically copy the music to the iTunes Music folder, and then drag the library on the Windows partition to the open iTunes window. This will not transfer playlists and other metadata and will not keep the Mac version of the library in sync.
(33924)

Compatibility across partitions.

Hi everybody,
Still waiting for iCloud to give me back the ability to retrieve an Excel for Mac spreadsheet that can be continuously updated, from Windows 7 to Mountain Lion and back again. This is the most important task for iCloud, to me. I could email it to myself via Outlook, I know; deleting the correct version every time is what scares me. Any fixes on the horizon?

Hi Templeton Peck,
First, just because it's so new, I guess. Also though, can I access Dropbox from a Windows 7 partition?
Riethul

Accessing files across partitions.

Hey all,
I was just wondering: If you're using boot camp to run two OSs, would you be able to access files saved in one OS from the other OS? If I save a Word document in the OS X, can it be accessed in Windows 7?
Looking into computers and just wasn't sure. Thanks!

I was just wondering: If you're using boot camp to run two OSs, would you be able to access files saved in one OS from the other OS?
Mac OS X can read an NTFS partition but can't write to it unless third-party software is installed.
Windows can't read or write Mac partitions natively; the Boot Camp drivers provide read access, but third-party software is needed to write to them.
A FAT32/MS-DOS partition can be read and written natively by both OSes, but can't be used to boot Windows Vista or Windows 7.
You also need to have an application installed which can open documents of that type.
(49839)

Can ARD fetch reports automatically across multiple partitions, without being in a particular partition?

I'm trying to run reports across multiple client computers that have data on 2-3 partitions per Mac. Is there anyway ARD can report to me data across partitions and not just the current partition the Mac is on? What I have to do now is restart into every partition and get ARD data off, too time consuming.
Also, where does ARD store it's reporting data?

Partitions are... old school. And it will interfere with Startup Disk, with OS X.
You could have used Windows 7 entirely and no sign of OS X (which can be installed and booted from external drives).
I like to use multiple hard drives: boot drive for system, another drive for data, and also backup, scratch etc.
If you use Windows 7 system image backup you should be able to restore any system in reasonable time and manner.

How to hide (make invisible) folders in Boot camp windows partition

I just bought my parents a mac mini core duo and set up boot camp on it. I used FAT32 so the windows partition shows up in OSX as a volume called "NO NAME". I can also see all of the files and system directories in the volume as one would expect. I have 2 questions.
1. can I rename the "NO NAME" partition from within osx to something more like "WINDOWS" or "XP"? or am I stuck with "NO NAME"?
2. How Can I hide all of the system files and directories? I don't want other people in the house to be able to see anything on that partition except for 1 directory called "DropBox" (or something like that). This will protect the windows partition from being tampered with, and any files that need to be moved across partitions can just be placed in the "DropBox" folder.
I would appreciate any help with this.
thanks,

Do you have the "Developer" folder on the main level of your hard drive? If not, you can manually install the Developer Tools from the install disk(s) that came with your iBook.
I would be more than just a little worried about using the Terminal and command line codes to start hiding files & folders on your Mac if you're not already familiar with those tools.
-Doug

Re: window objects & partitions

Are you aware of the "renderAsImage" method on the FieldWidget class?
It returns an "imageData" bitmap.
At 04:57 PM 6/17/96 +0200, you wrote:
Hi,
Do you know if it is possible to pass window object across partitions (
from client to server or from one client to another client )?
if not, how can I show to client1 a window snapshot of client2 ?
Thanks
Fabrizio
Barbero Fabrizio
CSI-PIEMONTE
Cso Unione Sovietica 216
10134 Torino ITALY
tel: +39 11 4618515
fax: +39 11 4618212
e-mail: [email protected]
Jim Rice ([email protected])
Technical Sales Mgr, Eastern Division
Direct 703-749-1445
Fax 703-749-1447
Corp. 510-869-3400 x2316

Hi,
Use the merge partition option.
See
http://download-west.oracle.com/docs/cd/A87860_01/doc/server.817/a76956/partiti.htm#12491
for examples.
hth

ASO Cube with BSO Partition as a Target

Hi,
Can someone please explain me the following because after reading different blogs as well as some other Essbase documents I am not able to understand,
What is the actual use of having a BSO Transparent partition (target) of an ASO cube (source)?
How exactly does the Write-Back functionality works if I have a BSO Transparent partition (target) of an ASO cube (source)?
And lastly, in what business scenario one would implement a BSO Transparent partition (target) of an ASO cube (source)?
Your help is much appreciated.
thanks,
fikes

I have a situation where I have a BSO (target) on top of an ASO (source). This was to try and resolve the dynamic time series (where time and periods are in different dimensions). The DTS works almost great in the BSO partition.
The other problem (or why we wanted to go to ASO) was that BSO cubes do not handle attributes across partitions (we have quarterly data in transparent partitions) to the target cube. -- but we do have dynamic time series.
What I'm facing now it that the attributes work in the BSO (target) except when using a dynamic time series.
The attributes are defined in both the BSO and ASO cubes.
Any suggestions on how to handle attributes AND dynamic time series ?

Coherence and horizontal partitioning

Hi everybody.
Im very new to the Coherence technolgy and i have some desperate question to you about its usage.
Basicly my boss wants a technolgy or method to handle multiple datasources which are possibly horizontal partitioned. And this technology have to reached from client side. This function has to be something like Data Dependent Routing or any routing mechanizm that can handle queries across partitioned databases. Also merging the results from the queries from databases.
Anyway can Coherence satisfy a functionality like Hibernate Shards does? Whats the difference if not?
I would be very pleased if you can help me about this.

I don't think Steve quite said "there is a way to horizontal partition +databases+" there is a way to partition your data - there is a difference. Coherence can horizontally partition data, what this means is that Coherence holds your data in memory on a lot of JVMs running on multiple physical servers - for example the system I work on at the moment pulls in over 100GB data from a number of source systems into a Coherence cluster of over 250 JVMs. Your data is distributed (or partitioned) across these JVMs so that each one holds part of the data. When you run an operation, such as a query, that operation will go to all the JVMs who will execute it against the data they own - something like Map Reduce.
If you want to hold data from a number of databases inside Coherence you will have to write code to load all that data into memory from the different DBs.
Asking for example source code for such a high level requirement is not really going to get you anywhere - it is not that simple. As Steve suggested you need to read either Alex's book (http://www.packtpub.com/oracle-coherence-35/book) or the initial chapters of the Coherence documentation (http://download.oracle.com/docs/cd/E15357_01/index.htm)
JK

RE: (forte-users) XMLParser-Node : Serializing parts of aDOM across par

I managed to solve this problem with the help of
Sanjeev Sondur and Girish Nair from Sun.
The Solution suggested is as follows :
Whenever a node is supposed to passed as a parameter
for an inter-partition call. We have marshal and
UN-Marshalling :
- Create a new document.
- Clone the node in the context on the new document
- Append the node to the new document
- Serialize the document into a MemoryStream which is
a attribute of the object (SerializedNode) that
is passed in Lieu of a Node.
- On the other end UnMarshall by DeSeralizing the Document
and then reading the node.
Code Follows :
SerializedNode::SerializeNode(pNode);
NewDoc : document = new();
lNode : node;
if pNode <> nil then
-- This clones the node from an old document and creates it
-- in the context of the new document.
lNode = NewDoc.ImportNodeFromDocument(pNode, deep = true);
-- You can then attach to the any part of DOM (I am using
child of root)
NewDoc.appendchild(lNode);
end if;
-- _mStream is MemoryStream
mStream.Open(Framework.SPAM_WRITE, IsBinary = TRUE);
_mStream.seek(0);
_mStream.WriteSerialized(NewDoc);
_mStream.close();
On the other end I Unmarshall it
SerializedNode::GetNode()
mStream.Open(Framework.SPAM_READ, IsBinary = TRUE);
_mStream.seek(0);
NewDoc : document = (Document)(_mStream.ReadSerialized());
lNode : node = NewDoc.getFirstChild();
if lNode = NIL then
task.lgr.putline(' In GetNode : Node was NIL');
end if;
return lNode;
Note : This can use used for read-only access to parts of the DOM.
across partitions.
Thanks to all who responded.
Vivek Shetty
vivekvi-corp.com vivek.shettyLibertyMutual.com
978-884-9942 (cell) 978-750-3639 x 202 (Liberty Mutual)
-----Original Message-----
From: Shetty, Vivek [mailto:Vivek.ShettyLibertyMutual.com]
Sent: Thursday, December 21, 2000 10:04 AM
To: 'forte-userslists.xpedior.com'
Subject: (forte-users) XMLParser-Node : Serializing parts of a DOM
across partitions
I am modeling an Insurance-Policy as a XML document.
One of my requirement was to pass pieces of this Policy (Node)
to a service object for processing.
I have discovered that the Node cannot be serialized across partitions.
I can serialize the whole document using the exportDocument and send
it across the partition and import it on the other end. This is fine when
large pieces of the document have to be sent over.
When smaller pieces of this information has to sent to a service object,
I was planning to create a new document, extract the required nodes
from the old document create in the new document and send the
new document (which is a subset) across.
I am having problems extracting a node from one document and
creating it another document.
I have tried node.clonenode, document.importnodefromdocument without much
success.
I have a choice of writing a method that creates a structure in the new
document by
recursively navigating the old tree and creating new nodes in the new
document from scratch.
Have any of you faced similar situations and come up with a more elegant
solution.
Please share.
Thanks
Vivek Shetty
vivekvi-corp.com vivek.shettyLibertyMutual.com
978-884-9942 (cell) 978-750-3639 x 202 (Liberty Mutual)
For the archives, go to: http://lists.xpedior.com/forte-users and use
the login: forte and the password: archive. To unsubscribe, send in a new
email the word: 'Unsubscribe' to: forte-users-requestlists.xpedior.com

PS/CC across partitions?

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for