PS CS4 consumes a lot more RAM than CS3

I recently updated from Photoshop CS3 to Photoshop CS4 and now I have the problem that CS4 is consuming very much RAM.
When I open the same image on both versions CS4 consumes like four times as much RAM as CS3 does.
Settings are identical on both versions, so I don't quite know how this can be.

TheARchitect2009 wrote:
As an example: In idle, without any file loaded, CS3 uses around 90MB while CS4 uses 380MB.
I don't run CS4 on Windows (just CS3) so I can't say whether is this normal behavior. That sadly may be simple application bloat. I was also shocked to see Vista using 1 GB of RAM when idle and without running apps.
Make sure your RAM allocation and history state settings are consistent between the versions.

Similar Messages

JVM takes more RAM than defined in -Xmx param on solaris

Hi all,
We have a problem on production installation of our product on Solaris paltfroms: jvm takes more (much more) RAM than defined in -Xmx param and without any OutOfMemory exceptions. (how itt possible at all ?)
The only JNI call in application is SAP interface connector, but application uses a lot of Runtime.exec() calls.
Is it possible to have such kind of "leaks" in java using JNI or Runtime.exec()?
I will be very appreciate for any tip how to find the root of this problem and how we can fix it ?
//rv
system details:
COMMAND
nohup /system/jre/bin/java -XX:+DisableExplicitGC -XX:NewSize=80m -XX:MaxNewSize=80m -Xms256m -Xmx256m -cp /system/bin/application.jar: applicationstart >/sysem/bin/../log/jvm.log
JAVAVERSION
SRV12345/root # /system/jre/bin/java -fullversion
java full version "1.4.2_08-b03"
OS-VERSION
[root@SRV12345] /->uname -r
5.8
TASKS
[root@SRV12345] /->prstat
PID USERNAME SIZE RSS STATE PRI NICE TIME CPU PROCESS/NLWP
6415 root 964M 913M sleep 29 10 20:33.12 0.3% java/128
Total: 75 processes, 310 lwps, load averages: 0.02, 0.04, 0.08
CPUS
root@SRV12345] /->psrinfo -v
Status of virtual processor 0 as of: 07/27/06 16:33:23
on-line since 05/22/06 11:40:25.
The sparcv9 processor operates at 1320 MHz,
and has a sparcv9 floating point processor.
Status of virtual processor 1 as of: 07/27/06 16:33:23
on-line since 05/22/06 11:40:26.
The sparcv9 processor operates at 1320 MHz,
and has a sparcv9 floating point processor.
HARDWARE
[root@SRV12345] /->prtconf
System Configuration: Sun Microsystems sun4us
Memory size: 4096 Megabytes
System Peripherals (Software Nodes):
MEMORY USAGE - PROCESS
[root@SRV12345] /->pmap -x 6415
6415: /oms/OMSSpooler/system/jre/bin/java -XX:+DisableExplicitGC -XX:NewSize
Address Kbytes Resident Shared Private Permissions Mapped File
00010000 72 72 72 - read/exec java
00030000 16 16 - 16 read/write/exec java
00034000 636528 636456 618112 18344 read/write/exec [ heap ]
DA77A000 8 8 - 8 read/write/exec [ anon ]
DA77E000 16 16 8 8 read/write/exec [ anon ]
DAD7A000 32 32 8 24 read/write/exec [ anon ]
DAE7A000 32 32 8 24 read/write/exec [ anon ]
DB07A000 32 32 8 24 read/write/exec [ anon ]
DB17A000 32 32 8 24 read/write/exec [ anon ]
DB278000 40 40 32 8 read/write/exec [ anon ]
DB67A000 32 32 8 24 read/write/exec [ anon ]
DB97A000 32 32 8 24 read/write/exec [ anon ]
DBA7A000 32 32 24 8 read/write/exec [ anon ]
DBB7A000 32 32 8 24 read/write/exec [ anon ]
DBC7A000 8 8 8 - read/write/exec [ anon ]
DBC7E000 16 16 8 8 read/write/exec [ anon ]
DBD76000 48 48 48 - read/write/exec [ anon ]
DBE7A000 32 32 8 24 read/write/exec [ anon ]
DBF78000 40 40 24 16 read/write/exec [ anon ]
DC07A000 8 8 - 8 read/write/exec [ anon ]
DC07E000 16 16 - 16 read/write/exec [ anon ]
DC17A000 32 32 24 8 read/write/exec [ anon ]
DC27A000 8 8 8 - read/write/exec [ anon ]
DC27E000 16 16 8 8 read/write/exec [ anon ]
DC37A000 8 8 8 - read/write/exec [ anon ]
DC37E000 16 16 8 8 read/write/exec [ anon ]
DC47A000 8 8 8 - read/write/exec [ anon ]
DC47E000 16 16 8 8 read/write/exec [ anon ]
DC778000 16 16 8 8 read/write/exec [ anon ]
DC77E000 16 16 - 16 read/write/exec [ anon ]
DC87A000 8 8 8 - read/write/exec [ anon ]
DC87E000 16 16 8 8 read/write/exec [ anon ]
DC97A000 8 8 8 - read/write/exec [ anon ]
DC97E000 16 16 8 8 read/write/exec [ anon ]
DCA7A000 8 8 8 - read/write/exec [ anon ]
DCA7E000 16 16 8 8 read/write/exec [ anon ]
DCB7A000 8 8 8 - read/write/exec [ anon ]
DCB7E000 16 16 8 8 read/write/exec [ anon ]
DCF7A000 32 32 16 16 read/write/exec [ anon ]
DD07A000 32 32 8 24 read/write/exec [ anon ]
DD17A000 32 32 8 24 read/write/exec [ anon ]
DD278000 40 40 16 24 read/write/exec [ anon ]
DD478000 40 40 40 - read/write/exec [ anon ]
DD67A000 32 32 8 24 read/write/exec [ anon ]
DD778000 40 40 16 24 read/write/exec [ anon ]
DDA7A000 32 32 16 16 read/write/exec [ anon ]
DDB78000 40 40 16 24 read/write/exec [ anon ]
DDC7A000 8 8 - 8 read/write/exec [ anon ]
DDC7E000 16 16 8 8 read/write/exec [ anon ]
DDD78000 40 40 32 8 read/write/exec [ anon ]
DDE78000 40 40 40 - read/write/exec [ anon ]
DE07A000 32 32 8 24 read/write/exec [ anon ]
DE178000 40 40 16 24 read/write/exec [ anon ]
DE276000 48 48 40 8 read/write/exec [ anon ]
DE37A000 32 32 8 24 read/write/exec [ anon ]
DE578000 40 40 16 24 read/write/exec [ anon ]
DE77A000 32 32 16 16 read/write/exec [ anon ]
DE87A000 32 32 32 - read/write/exec [ anon ]
DE97A000 32 32 8 24 read/write/exec [ anon ]
DEA78000 40 40 16 24 read/write/exec [ anon ]
DEB7A000 32 32 16 16 read/write/exec [ anon ]
DEC7A000 32 32 8 24 read/write/exec [ anon ]
DED78000 40 40 40 - read/write/exec [ anon ]
DEE7A000 32 32 8 24 read/write/exec [ anon ]
DEF7A000 32 32 8 24 read/write/exec [ anon ]
DF07A000 32 32 16 16 read/write/exec [ anon ]
DF27A000 32 32 24 8 read/write/exec [ anon ]
DF478000 40 40 40 - read/write/exec [ anon ]
DF578000 40 40 - 40 read/write/exec [ anon ]
DF77A000 32 32 8 24 read/write/exec [ anon ]
DF87A000 32 32 16 16 read/write/exec [ anon ]
DFA78000 40 40 16 24 read/write/exec [ anon ]
DFC7A000 8 8 - 8 read/write/exec [ anon ]
DFC7E000 16 16 - 16 read/write/exec [ anon ]
E0078000 40 40 8 32 read/write/exec [ anon ]
E0278000 40 40 16 24 read/write/exec [ anon ]
E067A000 32 32 24 8 read/write/exec [ anon ]
E077A000 8 8 8 - read/write/exec [ anon ]
E077E000 16 16 8 8 read/write/exec [ anon ]
E0878000 40 40 32 8 read/write/exec [ anon ]
E0978000 40 40 32 8 read/write/exec [ anon ]
E0A78000 40 40 24 16 read/write/exec [ anon ]
E0B78000 40 40 16 24 read/write/exec [ anon ]
E0C78000 40 40 32 8 read/write/exec [ anon ]
E0E7A000 8 8 8 - read/write/exec [ anon ]
E0E7E000 16 16 8 8 read/write/exec [ anon ]
E1076000 48 48 48 - read/write/exec [ anon ]
E117A000 32 32 32 - read/write/exec [ anon ]
E127A000 32 32 24 8 read/write/exec [ anon ]
E137A000 32 32 8 24 read/write/exec [ anon ]
E147A000 32 32 32 - read/write/exec [ anon ]
E1578000 40 40 16 24 read/write/exec [ anon ]
E187A000 8 8 - 8 read/write/exec [ anon ]
E187E000 16 16 - 16 read/write/exec [ anon ]
E1978000 40 40 24 16 read/write/exec [ anon ]
E1A78000 40 40 24 16 read/write/exec [ anon ]
E1B78000 40 40 16 24 read/write/exec [ anon ]
E1C7A000 32 32 16 16 read/write/exec [ anon ]
E1D7A000 32 32 8 24 read/write/exec [ anon ]
E1E78000 40 40 24 16 read/write/exec [ anon ]
E1F78000 40 40 8 32 read/write/exec [ anon ]
E207A000 32 32 32 - read/write/exec [ anon ]
E217A000 8 8 8 - read/write/exec [ anon ]
E217E000 16 16 8 8 read/write/exec [ anon ]
E227A000 32 32 8 24 read/write/exec [ anon ]
E2378000 40 40 16 24 read/write/exec [ anon ]
E247A000 32 32 32 - read/write/exec [ anon ]
E257A000 32 32 16 16 read/write/exec [ anon ]
E267A000 32 32 16 16 read/write/exec [ anon ]
E2878000 40 40 16 24 read/write/exec [ anon ]
E297A000 32 32 16 16 read/write/exec [ anon ]
E2A7A000 32 32 16 16 read/write/exec [ anon ]
E2B7A000 32 32 16 16 read/write/exec [ anon ]
E2C00000 4408 688 688 - read/exec librfccm.so
E305C000 2584 664 624 40 read/write/exec librfccm.so
E32E2000 688 320 312 8 read/write/exec librfccm.so
E3400000 2072 120 120 - read/exec libsapjcorfc.so
E3614000 24 24 24 - read/write/exec libsapjcorfc.so
E36FA000 32 32 8 24 read/write/exec [ anon ]
E38FA000 8 8 - 8 read/write/exec [ anon ]
E38FE000 16 16 - 16 read/write/exec [ anon ]
E39F6000 48 48 - 48 read/write/exec [ anon ]
E3AFA000 32 32 32 - read/write/exec [ anon ]
E3BF8000 40 40 16 24 read/write/exec [ anon ]
E3CFA000 32 32 16 16 read/write/exec [ anon ]
E3DFA000 32 32 32 - read/write/exec [ anon ]
E3EFA000 8 8 - 8 read/write/exec [ anon ]
E3EFE000 16 16 - 16 read/write/exec [ anon ]
E3FF8000 40 40 40 - read/write/exec [ anon ]
E40FA000 8 8 - 8 read/write/exec [ anon ]
E40FE000 16 16 - 16 read/write/exec [ anon ]
E41F6000 48 48 40 8 read/write/exec [ anon ]
E42FA000 32 32 32 - read/write/exec [ anon ]
E43F6000 48 48 - 48 read/write/exec [ anon ]
E44F8000 40 40 - 40 read/write/exec [ anon ]
E45F8000 40 40 32 8 read/write/exec [ anon ]
E46FA000 8 8 - 8 read/write/exec [ anon ]
E46FE000 16 16 - 16 read/write/exec [ anon ]
E47F8000 40 40 16 24 read/write/exec [ anon ]
E48FA000 32 32 24 8 read/write/exec [ anon ]
E49F8000 40 40 16 24 read/write/exec [ anon ]
E4AFA000 8 8 - 8 read/write/exec [ anon ]
E4AFE000 16 16 - 16 read/write/exec [ anon ]
E4BFA000 8 8 - 8 read/write/exec [ anon ]
E4BFE000 16 16 - 16 read/write/exec [ anon ]
E4CF6000 48 48 40 8 read/write/exec [ anon ]
E4DF6000 48 48 - 48 read/write/exec [ anon ]
E4E80000 720 112 112 - read/shared dev:85,6 ino:2414099
E4F80000 1616 16 16 - read/shared dev:85,6 ino:2604124
E5180000 584 24 24 - read/shared dev:85,6 ino:2604127
E5280000 560 32 32 - read/shared dev:85,6 ino:2604145
E5380000 504 16 16 - read/shared dev:85,6 ino:2604133
E5480000 1776 40 40 - read/shared dev:85,6 ino:2604140
E5680000 1120 56 56 - read/shared dev:85,6 ino:2604138
E5800000 277504 277344 268008 9336 read/write/exec [ anon ]
F9900000 752 8 8 - read/shared dev:85,6 ino:899745
F9A80000 8 8 - 8 read/write/exec [ anon ]
F9B7C000 24 24 16 8 read/write/exec [ anon ]
F9C00000 9280 8944 8760 184 read/write/exec [ anon ]
FBC50000 8 8 8 - read/shared dev:85,6 ino:2414079
FBC60000 16 16 16 - read/shared dev:85,6 ino:2414042
FBC70000 24 24 24 - read/shared dev:85,6 ino:2414043
FBC80000 440 32 32 - read/shared dev:85,6 ino:2604129
FBD80000 8 8 - 8 read/write/exec [ anon ]
FBD90000 8 8 - 8 read/write/exec [ anon ]
FBDA0000 56 56 56 - read/exec libnet.so
FBDBC000 16 16 16 - read/write/exec libnet.so
FBDD0000 176 16 16 - read/shared dev:85,6 ino:2604126
FBE80000 8 8 - 8 read/write/exec [ anon ]
FBE90000 128 8 8 - read/shared dev:85,6 ino:2604148
FBEC0000 216 8 8 - read/shared dev:85,6 ino:2604125
FBF7A000 32 32 24 8 read/write/exec [ anon ]
FBF90000 416 8 8 - read/shared dev:85,6 ino:2604128
FC000000 5696 8 8 - read/shared dev:85,6 ino:1450986
FC5A0000 344 40 40 - read/shared dev:85,6 ino:2604131
FC67A000 32 32 24 8 read/write/exec [ anon ]
FC690000 24 24 24 - read/exec libpthread.so.1
FC6A6000 8 8 8 - read/write/exec libpthread.so.1
FC6B0000 304 40 40 - read/shared dev:85,6 ino:2604144
FC780000 8 8 - 8 read/write/exec [ anon ]
FC7A0000 352 24 24 - read/shared dev:85,6 ino:2604147
FC800000 23464 16 16 - read/shared dev:85,6 ino:1451026
FDEF0000 8 8 8 - read/exec libw.so.1
FDF00000 192 24 24 - read/shared dev:85,6 ino:2604142
FDF40000 96 8 8 - read/shared dev:85,6 ino:2604134
FDF60000 240 40 40 - read/shared dev:85,6 ino:2604157
FDFA0000 360 352 352 - read/write/exec [ anon ]
FE000000 4032 2472 2472 - read/exec libjvm.so
FE3F0000 128 128 88 40 read/write/exec libjvm.so
FE410000 56 56 48 8 read/write/exec libjvm.so
FE430000 32 32 32 - read/shared dev:85,6 ino:2604137
FE440000 208 40 40 - read/shared dev:85,6 ino:2604135
FE480000 544 544 328 216 read/write/exec [ anon ]
FE520000 8 8 8 - read/write/exec [ anon ]
FE530000 32 32 32 - read/shared dev:85,6 ino:2604146
FE540000 16 16 16 - read/shared dev:85,6 ino:2604123
FE550000 40 16 16 - read/shared dev:85,6 ino:2604139
FE560000 56 - - - read/shared dev:85,6 ino:899744
FE580000 152 152 152 - read/write/exec [ anon ]
FE610000 112 8 8 - read/shared dev:85,6 ino:899742
FE630000 32 32 24 8 read/write/exec [ anon ]
FE660000 72 - - - read/shared dev:85,6 ino:1450975
FE680000 872 8 8 - read/shared dev:85,6 ino:1450985
FE760000 8 8 8 - read/shared dev:85,6 ino:2604132
FE770000 88 16 16 - read/shared dev:85,6 ino:1450974
FE790000 64 64 64 - read/exec libzip.so
FE7A0000 8 8 8 - read/write/exec libzip.so
FE7B0000 8 8 - 8 read/write/exec [ anon ]
FE7C0000 136 136 136 - read/exec libjava.so
FE7F2000 8 8 8 - read/write/exec libjava.so
FE802000 8 8 8 - read/write/exec [ anon ]
FE904000 8 8 8 - read/write/exec [ anon ]
FEA06000 8 8 8 - read/write/exec [ anon ]
FEB08000 8 8 8 - read/write/exec [ anon ]
FEC0A000 8 8 8 - read/write/exec [ anon ]
FED0C000 8 8 8 - read/write/exec [ anon ]
FEE0A000 8 8 8 - read/write/exec [ anon ]
FEE0E000 8 8 8 - read/write/exec [ anon ]
FEF0C000 8 8 - 8 read/write/exec [ anon ]
FEF10000 8 8 8 - read/write/exec [ anon ]
FF00E000 8 8 8 - read/write/exec [ anon ]
FF020000 88 88 88 - read/exec libverify.so
FF046000 8 8 8 - read/write/exec libverify.so
FF050000 16 16 16 - read/shared dev:85,6 ino:899743
FF060000 40 40 40 - read/exec libhpi.so
FF07A000 8 8 8 - read/write/exec libhpi.so
FF07C000 8 - - - read/write/exec libhpi.so
FF090000 16 16 16 - read/exec libmp.so.2
FF0A4000 8 8 8 - read/write/exec libmp.so.2
FF0B0000 224 104 104 - read/exec libm.so.1
FF0F6000 8 8 8 - read/write/exec libm.so.1
FF100000 576 576 576 - read/exec libnsl.so.1
FF190000 40 40 32 8 read/write/exec libnsl.so.1
FF19A000 24 16 16 - read/write/exec libnsl.so.1
FF1B0000 8 8 8 - read/exec libsched.so.1
FF1C2000 8 8 8 - read/write/exec libsched.so.1
FF1D0000 8 8 - 8 read/write/exec [ anon ]
FF1E0000 40 40 40 - read/exec libsocket.so.1
FF1FA000 8 8 8 - read/write/exec libsocket.so.1
FF200000 688 688 688 - read/exec libc.so.1
FF2BC000 32 32 8 24 read/write/exec libc.so.1
FF2D0000 48 48 48 - read/exec libCrun.so.1
FF2EA000 8 8 8 - read/write/exec libCrun.so.1
FF2EC000 16 8 8 - read/write/exec libCrun.so.1
FF300000 16 16 16 - read/write/shared dev:0,2 ino:7595433
FF314000 8 8 8 - read/write/exec [ anon ]
FF320000 8 8 8 - read/write/exec/shared [ anon ]
FF330000 8 8 - 8 read/write/exec [ anon ]
FF340000 8 8 - 8 read/write/exec libdl.so.1
FF350000 112 112 112 - read/exec libthread.so.1
FF37C000 8 8 - 8 read/write/exec libthread.so.1
FF37E000 48 48 - 48 read/write/exec libthread.so.1
FF390000 8 8 8 - read/exec libc_psr.so.1
FF3A0000 184 184 184 - read/exec ld.so.1
FF3DE000 8 8 - 8 read/write/exec ld.so.1
FF3E0000 8 8 - 8 read/write/exec ld.so.1
FFB70000 24 - - - - [ anon ]
FFBD6000 104 104 96 8 read/write/exec [ stack ]
total Kb 986752 936008 905624 30384

See http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.5/pdf/jdk50_ts_guide.pdf and look into using libumen on Solaris.
-kto

More ram than specs call for

Specs for my emac specify support for 1GB of ram. In searching for additional ram (I presently have 512MB) I have found some suppliers that claim you can install 2GB (1GB in each of the two slots). I called and they said they have tested this and it works fine. I consider the company I called to be reputable. Has anyone heard of this? What would be the downside of trying it out - other than the extra cost? Is there some kind of power limitations or something that might harm my computer?
Thanks for any insight,
Doug

Ya if you do a search of this group, you will find this has come up a LOT of times and yes your Mac can use more RAM than 1GB if you want.
JIMacG5 I think is being a bit paranoid since, A) your eMac is probably long out of warranty anyway and B) Apple only tests up to whatever RAM was available at the time the model was in production. They do not test RAM for old models so many old models have outdates RAM specs and can use a lot more than they "officially" state they do.
Patrick

KDE 4.4 eating up more RAM than 4.3

Given the same settings on both versions and after numerous testing, upon bootup, KDE 4.4 is eating up more RAM than KDE 4.3, at least 25 MB more on the average. I realize the developers mentioned they fixed numerous bugs from the previous version, but shouldn't they be working on getting it lighter? Where's the most likely culprit for this additional RAM usage? Can it be attributed to the newer QT version 4.6.1, or something else? Opinions much appreciated, thanks.
Last edited by ejmarkow (2010-02-10 21:07:15)

eldarion wrote:It's not that simple. I'ts a controversial subject that was discussed many times before.
As for preload, i installed that some time ago and after 1-2 months i found out that it don't give me a visible speedup on cold start of my apps. In fact, the only thing it was doing was making my linux boot very slow.
Well, it really is that simple. If I have spare RAM, I want something on my computer to start using it.
Preload greatly increases speed on my end on some apps. Mostly big apps, like Openoffice and Kontact, which starts instantly with preload, and takes forever to run if I disable it. It doesn't increase boot time at all for me (I just start it in background, the rest of the loading happens after login and is not noticable on my system). Guess our milage are different.
unixguru wrote:
rune0077 wrote:
Don't complain about RAM-use unless you're running out. Free RAM is wasted RAM (and, worse, wasted money you spend on that RAM). If there's RAM not being used, a good OS will find ways to use it.
Instead of worrying about how to free up your used RAM, start worrying about how to use the RAM that is not being used (increase browser-cache, install preload, give Nepomuk more memory, etc).
Certainly free RAM is a wasted resource, but the point of the discussion is whether the increase in RAM usage on KDE 4.4 is a good use of RAM. It is quite possible that the increase in RAM usage is due to bugs introduced in the new code and tracing the exact cause is helpful when one wants to submit a bug report to the KDE team. The RAM saved this way could be used for more useful things in the next release of KDE.
True. I was making a general statement, not being specific to KDE. Memory leaks are obviously not RAM being put to good use.
In KDE 4.3 I found nepomuk all but useless. It slowed down my desktop and had a bad habbit of crashing Dolphin. Now it seems to run pretty well and I barely notice it, but it does take up a lot of my RAM compared to memory-usage in 4.3. But then, I feel like I'm getting something for my money. And I still got lots of RAM to spare, and no ideas on what to use it on.
Last edited by rune0077 (2010-02-13 17:01:39)

I haven't been on itunes in a very long time. I had a lot more songs than are there now. What can I do about it, or is there a way to access the missing songs?

I haven't been on itunes in a very long time. I had a lot more songs than there are listed there now. What can I do about it, or is there something I can do to get the missing songs back?

forget about it, I actually figured it out.

I use itunes on a Dell XPS502 with W7/64. In some cases have have problems to import CD's. The sound is very disturbed and the import need a lot more time than in normal cases. Is there a problem between itunes W7/64 or a known hardware issue?

I use itunes on a Dell XPS502 with W7/64. In some cases have have problems to import CD's. The sound is very disturbed and the import need a lot more time than in normal cases. Is there a problem between itunes and W7/64 or a known hardware issue?
Example-CD : "Tracy Chapman , Telling stories" is not able to import . I have more such negative cases. But in other cases it works fine and the sound is great.
The firmware at the inbuild CD/DVD DS-6E2SH is the latest version.
What can I do??

hi b noir,
I don't no about virtuel drives like you mententioned. In the mean time I have rebooted the XPS and run again the iTunes diagnostics. I think the back - chance in the registry was not ready to use. Now there are another results. They are the same in case of a running CD or a not running CD. The difference in total is like before. It takes more time that iTunes reads the (bad) CD and at the there is no good sound. In both cases ( running or not running CD) iTunes diagnostics gives as a result :
(the copie from ITunes shows the result of the not running CD from Tracy Chapman)
Microsoft Windows 7 x64 Ultimate Edition Service Pack 1 (Build 7601)
Dell Inc. Dell System XPS L502X
iTunes 10.3.1.55
QuickTime 7.6.9
FairPlay 1.11.17
Apple Application Support 1.5.2
iPod Updater-Bibliothek 10.0d2
CD Driver 2.2.0.1
CD Driver DLL 2.1.1.1
Apple Mobile Device 3.4.0.25
Apple Mobile Device Treiber 1.55.0.0
Bonjour 2.0.5.0 (214.3)
Gracenote SDK 1.8.2.457
Gracenote MusicID 1.8.2.89
Gracenote Submit 1.8.2.123
Gracenote DSP 1.8.2.34
iTunes-Seriennummer 00D7B2B00CD25750
Aktueller Benutzer ist kein Administrator.
Aktuelles Datum und Uhrzeit sind 2011-06-11 19:33:22.
iTunes befindet sich nicht im abgesicherten Modus.
WebKit Accelerated Compositing ist aktiviert.
HDCP wird unterstützt.
Core Media wird unterstützt.
Info zu Video-Anzeige
NVIDIA, NVIDIA GeForce GT 540M
Intel Corporation, Intel(R) HD Graphics Family
**** Info für externe Plug-Ins ****
Keine externen Plug-Ins installiert.
iPodService 10.3.1.55 (x64) arbeitet zurzeit.
iTunesHelper 10.3.1.55 arbeitet zurzeit.
Apple Mobile Device service 3.3.0.0 arbeitet zurzeit.
**** CD/DVD-Laufwerkstests****
LowerFilters: PxHlpa64 (2.0.0.0),
UpperFilters: GEARAspiWDM (2.2.0.1),
D: PLDS DVDRWBD DS-6E2SH, Rev CD11
Audio-CD im Laufwerk
11 Titel auf der CD gefunden, Spieldauer: 42:07 auf Audio-CD
Titel 1, Startzeit: 00:02:00
Titel 2, Startzeit: 03:59:47
Titel 3, Startzeit: 07:19:27
Titel 4, Startzeit: 11:31:30
Titel 5, Startzeit: 15:31:50
Titel 6, Startzeit: 20:07:50
Titel 7, Startzeit: 24:27:15
Titel 8, Startzeit: 27:49:10
Titel 9, Startzeit: 32:41:25
Titel 10, Startzeit: 35:29:65
Titel 11, Startzeit: 38:38:00
Audio-CD erfolgreich gelesen (Suche nach alter Firmware).
Laufwerksgeschwindigkeit erfolgreich erkannt
Die CDR-Geschwindigkeiten des Laufwerks sind: 4 10 16 24
Die CDRW-Geschwindigkeiten des Laufwerks sind: 4
Die DVDR-Geschwindigkeiten des Laufwerks sind: 4
Die DVDRW-Geschwindigkeiten des Laufwerks sind: 4
After starting the import it is going slower and slower. If it is helpful I can send you a soundfile with these distortions.
best regards
tcgerd

"Last Month" in RECENT shows a lot more photos than just last month's photo

For some reason when I select "Last Month" in RECENT (on the left) I get a lot more photos than just last month, it seems like just about all the photos from the current year!
Any one else running into this problem?
By the way, my library was originally created using iPhoto '07 and I upgraded when iLife '08 came out.

Indeed that is the case but it sounds to me like a bug and not a feature.
I agree - but since this is just a user forum that is all I can do
report to Apple -- iphoto menu ==> Provide iPhoto feedback - they can change it
Larry Nebel

WhatsApp on E72 consuming a lot of RAM

I have observed that WhatsApp consumes a lot of RAM on my E72. So much so that I can't even use Maps or browse heavy pages. To free up the RAM, I need to switch it off but even though I exit the program, it still is running in back ground and consuming the RAM.
Is there any way that I can close this program ? Currently I am using NetQin to close it but its a very lengthy process.
Also if any of you are using an equally good program kindly inform so that I can switch over.
Using Nokia Lumia 1320.
Also have Nokia E72 & Nokia N8.

anyone with appropriate response?!!
Using Nokia Lumia 1320.
Also have Nokia E72 & Nokia N8.

Why Firefox 5.0 Still Consumes A Lot Of RAM?

Contrary to many statements that Firefox 5.0 is RAM optimized and uses less, i still have Firefox eating '''[http://i.stack.imgur.com/i1AgT.png almost ~800MB of RAM and mapping more]'''.
I used command:
''about:memory''
And was presented with a modules/extension tree and i don't understand what each means. Does anybody here have experience or knowledge about this here who could tell me where may be the problem?

Have you any particular reason for using an older version of Firefox.
Whilst I rarely use firefox 3.6 now, and do not know the answer I will comment that the now unsupported firefox 4 did have bad memory problems in some cases. Some of those problems were addressed in firefox 5, and others are addressed in Firefox 7, which is due out on the Aurora channel next week.
You could consider upgrading to a newer version of firefox. If you need firefox3.6 only for limited use you could consider using Firefox portable, alongside a newer version of Firefox.
* portable: http://portableapps.com/apps/internet/firefox_portable/localization#legacy36
* see also
**[[installing a previous version of firefox]]
**[[high memory usage]]
**[[firefox consumes a lot of CPU resources]]

MBP Memory Upgrade Using More RAM than Before

Hey,
I have a 13-inch, late 2011 Macbook Pro with a 2.8 GHz Intel Core i7 Processor. I recently changed my 4GB memory (2 modules) PC3-10600 DDR3 1333 MHz to a Crucial 16GB PC3-10600 DDR3 1333 MHz.
Before the upgrade, the activity monitor would show memory used at around 3.98GB or so, and I was running only chrome with a few tabs open. Using chrome and a few more apps would slow down the computer significantly, though still usable.
After the upgrade, the activity monitor shows memory used at around 6.5GB with the same apps running (just chrome). My computer does run a faster and can handle a lot more apps.
My question is, why is my Macbook using more RAM after the upgrade?
Thanks,
Sebs

The short answer is that memory unused is memory wasted.
Mavericks is designed to decrease reliance upon mass storage, which is orders of magnitude slower than RAM. Mavericks will use all the memory available to it before resorting to using the swapfile. You are likely to find "swap used" to be zero, even with Google Chrome's notoriously profligate use of system resources.
Read: OS X Mavericks: About Activity Monitor

All things being equal, does 4th gen quad core i7 (2.5GHz) need more RAM than 5th gen dual core i5 (2.7GHz) for same tasks?

Bought mid/late 2014 15" MBPr with the i7 2.5GHz and 16GB RAM. I'm within 2 week exchange period at Best Buy, and thinking of switching to 2015 13" MBPr with i5 2.7GHz and 8GB RAM for battery life and weight, and they don't offer the upgraded 16GB RAM option for any 13" models.
Needs to be Best Buy because of gift cards
Use docked at office 75% of time vs 25% out of office, so portability and battery life are nice to have but not as important as if I had 8 hour flights on weekly basis
See appeal of having 5th gen i5 in 13" vs my 4th gen i7 that will be updated this summer
Not a gamer and don't use Final Cut or other video editing, but I tend to leave several applications open and usually have between 1-3 GB free RAM of the 16GB total at any time according to my Memory Cleaner readings
Therefore, worried that 8GB is a non-starter as simple math says that I would have shortfall of 5-7GB RAM based on above readings, but wondering if dual core i5 will use RAM more efficiently than quad core i7
Any help greatly appreciated!

Also to note, would like this to last 4 years, which was reason that I bought the higher spec'd model even though I don't run games or video editing

Why Firefox Has Spikes In CPU Usage And Consumes A Lot Of RAM Since Security Update?

After applying security update 3.6.18 i started having this problem. I had this problem earlier but it only happened after several days Firefox was opened constantly. Now i have this problem several hours later after launching Firefox.
[http://i.stack.imgur.com/PJmH5.png '''Here is a picture of high RAM usage''']
'''[http://i.stack.imgur.com/tjsqt.png Here is a picture of high RAM and CPU usage]'''
I have Flash disabled.
What is going on? Should i reinstall Firefox 3.6.18?

Have you any particular reason for using an older version of Firefox.
Whilst I rarely use firefox 3.6 now, and do not know the answer I will comment that the now unsupported firefox 4 did have bad memory problems in some cases. Some of those problems were addressed in firefox 5, and others are addressed in Firefox 7, which is due out on the Aurora channel next week.
You could consider upgrading to a newer version of firefox. If you need firefox3.6 only for limited use you could consider using Firefox portable, alongside a newer version of Firefox.
* portable: http://portableapps.com/apps/internet/firefox_portable/localization#legacy36
* see also
**[[installing a previous version of firefox]]
**[[high memory usage]]
**[[firefox consumes a lot of CPU resources]]

Photoshop CS5 consumes a lot of RAM

Hi,
While using Adobe Photoshop CS5, I am suffering of RAM loss, it consumes around 2.5 GB of my RAM, while Adobe Illustrator CS5 consumes around 500 MB of RAM.
Is this normal or I have to do something to minimize memory usage with Photoshop?

By default, Photoshop uses 70% of available RAM. The more RAM available to Photoshop, the faster Photoshop can process image information.
You can adjust here:
Choose Photoshop > Preferences > Performance...adjust in 5% increments...restart Photoshop after each change.
You really should Max out your computer, if you want the best performance, before messing with Photoshop.

Can I add more ram than suggested

I need to get some more ram for my imac that apple say I can expand to 16gb. I currently have the standed 4gb.
In the following article from pcworld i noticed the following (especially the bold)
All iMacs come standard with 4GB of memory, installed as a pair of 2GB modules. When you order an iMac through the Apple Online Store, you have the option to upgrade the memory to 8GB (a pair of 4GB modules) on all iMac models for $200, or to 16GB (four 4GB modules) on the 27-inch models for $600. The iMac has four memory slots located at the bottom of the iMac that are user-accessible. Since two slots are empty when you buy an standard-configuration iMac, you can easily add more memory. The 21.5 inch iMac has support for up to 16GB of memory; third party companies are offering 32GB memory upgrades for the new 27-inch iMac.
Does this mean that I can technically go up to 32gb? Is there a down side to adding more the an 16gb suggested.

Although you can install up to 16 GBs of RAM in both 21 and 27" models, I can not confirm that you can install 32 GBs in the 27" model. You might check OWC to see what they say.

WmiPrvSE.exe Consuming A Lot of RAM on 2012R2 DCs with SCOM Agent

Good afternoon,
I have three Windows Server 2012 R2 Domain controllers (AD DS, DNS, and DFS roles) and I'm running SCOM 2012 R2 Update Rollup 1 with all the latest management packs for Server 2012 R2, Active Directory, DNS, and DFS.
When I install SCOM agents on these DCs, a WmiPrvSE process starts consuming a lot of memory until it reaches around 512MB. At that point no one can RDP to the DCs, but we can enter-possession to get-process | sort ws and kill the offending WmiPrvSE.exe
process. When I uninstall the SCOM agent the server returns to normal.
Other Windows Server 2012 R2 servers in our environment don't have this problem.  And when we had Windows Server 2012 (no R2) domain controllers this wasn't an issue. My assumption is one of the management packs are an issue.
I've seen other posts, but they are either related to older versions of Windows Server or not domain controllers.
These are all the features I have installed on the DCs:
Active Directory Domain Services
DNS Server
File and Storage Services
File and iSCSI Services
File Server
DFS Namespaces
DFS Replication
File Server Resource Manager
Storage Services
.NET Framework 3.5 Features
.NET Framework 3.5 (includes .NET 2.0 and 3.0)
.NET Framework 4.5 Features
.NET Framework 4.5
WCF Services
TCP Port Sharing
Group Policy Management
Remote Differential Compression
Remote Server Administration Tools
Role Administration Tools
AD DS and AD LDS Tools
Active Directory module for Windows PowerShell
AD DS Tools
Active Directory Administrative Center
AD DS Snap-Ins and Command-Line Tools
DNS Server Tools
File Services Tools
DFS Management Tools
File Server Resource Manager Tools
SMB 1.0/CIFS File Sharing Support
User Interfaces and Infrastructure
Graphical Management Tools and Infrastructure
Server Graphical Shell
Windows PowerShell
Windows PowerShell 4.0
Windows PowerShell 2.0 Engine
Windows PowerShell ISE
Windows Server Backup
WoW64 Support

I have ever seen somebody has similar problem when import DNS MP to DC. Check whether it is this situation.
Otherwise, Open Event Viewer to see if there are any useful info there.
Last, apply the Hotfix below.
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/2919355
Juke Chou
TechNet Community Support

PS CS4 consumes a lot more RAM than CS3

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for