PS CS6 10bit with Quadro K4000 and 30" Dell U3011.  My experiences...

Hello everyone.  I had searched quite extensively when looking into a solution for my color banding on an ancient Apple 30" cinema display which was on it's last leg.  That search led me to 10bit and it's surprisingly obscure implementation in PS.  Allow me to share my experiences so others doing google searches can potentially be helped, and also pose a few questions that Nvidia could not answer for me.
First, I am running Windows 7 x64, latest drivers/patches on everything.  Everything includes:
PNY Quadro K4000
Dell U3011 via Displayport
Windows 7 x64
Photoshop CS6 x64
2560 x 1600 Desktop resolution
So the long story here is that I did not think my combination was working.  I tried the ramp.psd from AMDs website, and saw absolutely no change.  Frustrated, I hit the internet, and unfortunately, found a plethora of AMD/ATI based help, but very very little Nvidia Quadro support, msot likely due to their "it just works" mentality (http://nvidia.custhelp.com/app/answers/detail/a_id/3049/~/how-to-enable-30-bit-color-on-wi ndows-platforms).  The help files say that the Quadro and PS will just detect the ability to use 10bit color depth and use it, but there is no way to confirm that that combination is in fact compatible without actually seeing the result.  No screen overlays, no checkboxes in the driver (as far as confirmation goes).  You can force 10bit in the quadro driver, but that doesn't tell you it's actually working. 
So I got on the live support with a helpful tech from Nvidia and eventually got to the bottom of it.  Things I learned:
- with Photoshop maximized at 2560 x 1600, 10bit did NOT work with any of the flyout panels open.  This was the number one hair-puller, and why I thought this was not working at all the entire time.  I had my history panel out.  At some point while chatting with the Nvidia rep I decided to take photoshop off of full screen so I could see both PS and the chat window at the same time. The PS window then occupied maybe 70% of the screenspace and poof.. the bands disappeared.  I slowly drag the corner of the screen out to make it larger and at some point the bands pop back in.  Odd.  So I maximize but close the flyout history panel and poof, bands disappear.  If I'm fullscreen and hit tab to hide shelves and panels, smooth as butter as well.  The Nvidia rep summized that it had to do with OpenGL overlays interfering, but had nothing to offer in the way of the resolution/screen size issue.
So I either have to view 10bit as a toggle, or not use my pallets as flyouts in the main PS window, or not maximize PS.
So, I'm sure there are other people running this combo, so I'd love to hear your results.  ATI/AMD cards are clearly a different driver set, and thus, probably totally different results.  Nvidia claims there is NO resolution limit to 10bit written into their driver, so the resolution being the problem did not make sense to them.  That laid the blame purely on Photoshop.  I'd love to hear from Adobe on the matter. 
In any case, hopefully this helps someone struggling as to why they see no difference on that gradient image.  It is literally night and day, so if you aren't seeing that "pop," it's just not working.
I must say that, as I've read in countless other posts, in actual photos, this 10bit can be a very minimal improvement, but it is noticeable in some of my shots where I have color grads on skintones.  The red burn is gone, and it's a much smoother transition.  This is insanely evident in purely CG created gradients or gausian blurred overlays, however.  I have a few CG-assisted background hotspots with the addition of a gausian blurred screen of white, and it has helped that quite a bit.
I, for one, welcome out 10bit overlords.  Hope this helps someone.
Cheers
- Justin

"Have you tried disabling desktop composition (Aero Glass)?  I have heard there can be conflicts there that prevent drivers from enabling full 30 bit color."
This is disabled automatically by the Quadro driver the second you turn on the Deep Color option.  And no, as someone who uses his machine for production moreso than pleasure, I immediately turn all that stuff off anyways as it's useless.
I will test that file after work tonight when I get home.  No 10bit here.  Irony. 
Thanks.  I'll also try to make a video/animated gif of sorts to illustrate the difference to your naked eye.  I was also quite clueless as to the "real world" implications when I started looking into this, as all you really find are generated gradients, which seem doctored at times.  Seeing the pop happen with your own eyes is quite interesting, and a definite selling feature.
Oh, also, I will add that I previously ordered the new U2713H from Dell, and I was 100% disssatisfied with the backlight bleed, as well as the color representation and quality control.  Mine had a very terribly noticeable yellow color bleed in the lower left.  I found this to be a regular occurance for these newer LED backlit monitors, and ultimately returned it and went with the older CCFL U3011.  It is far superior IMO and only slightly more expensive.  Highly recommended.  This forum posting swayed my ultimate decision away from the U3014: http://hardforum.com/showthread.php?t=1751499
- Justin

Similar Messages

  • Photoshop CS6 installation with student licensing and moving to Windows 64 bit?

    I purchased PS CS6 with student licensing. I was told that I can do two installations (or activations). My question is this: I am currently running Windows 7 32 bit, but I plan to reinstall Windows 7 64 bit later in order to increase my RAM. If I install CS6 now with 32 bit, is it considered a second activation if I reinstall it later under 64 bit, even if it is on the same machine? 
    Thanks for any information.

    You can install the PS CS6 on Windows 7 32 bit and use it , once you have to re-install the Windows 7 64 bit ,
    Open Photoshop , Go to Help --> Deactivate
    This will deactivate your existing actiavtion and then you can re-install PS on Windows 7 64 Bit , without loosing the activation count.

  • MacMini and 2 Dell U3011

    Does new MacMini supports two Dell U3011 or Apple LED Cinema Displaies

    That happens simultaneously i hoppe...
    Does Thunderbolt runs Dell with 2560x1600 resolution, or displayport does it so?
    What happens with HDMI and the second Dell? Does HDMI support 2560x1600 or just 1080p?
    Yours
    A.M.

  • Using High-end Windows 8.1 system with Quadro Card and CC2014 fails on many levels. Help!!

    I produce TV spots daily and and I can not afford so many failures. CC2014 is the worst experience for us and we have several systems that prove it's not our hardware.
    -Crashes repeatedly (and most times can not be replicated)
    -Freezes when queuing to media encoder
    -Rendered media has variable results and sometimes has no audio (or the audio is partially there). Have to reboot to correct.
    -Sporadic timeline behavior with audio playback being intermittent
    -Useless clip syncing function using audio tracks
    -Clip movement is frozen and cannot be moved until it's de-selected or the system has to be restarted 
    -Project bin behavior sends clips and text to the wrong folder.
    -All the above happens when Cuda card is turn on or off.
    -Some operations can not returned to normal unless we cold boot
    -Just found out that the audio filter DeNoiser does not render out entirely, you can hear mid way the clip when it kicks in  
    I originally paid for my monthly subscription because CC first came out as an improvement to earlier version, and was very stable. Now I'm wonder why I'm wasting my money. Don't get me wrong, I like where adobe is heading but they need to address the problem or offer a discount. I'd rather they fix EVERYTHING!
    My system (one of them)
    Operating System        Microsoft Windows 8.1 Pro with Media Center
    Central Processor        Dual Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2650 0 @ 2.00GHz (16 cores)
    Graphics                     Video Adapter        NVIDIA Quadro 6000
                                      Screen Resolution        2560 x 1080
    RAM                          63.95 GB
    Free Memory              54.68 GB
    Total Hard disk           7898.89 GB
    Motherboard               Z9PE-D8 WS
    Manufacturer              ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC.
    Any ideas? Is there any updates coming?
    My work... http://cmediapost.com

    Hi,
    Try to boot from win PE, please verify disk status, make sure partitions, files applied successfully.
    Please also check boot files.
    In addition, is the machine under UEFI mode?
    Please remember to mark the replies as answers if they help and unmark them if they provide no help. If you have feedback for TechNet Subscriber Support, contact [email protected]

  • Adobe Maximus with Quadro K5000 and Tesla C2075

    Hi there,
    i have a Nvidia Quadro K5000 installed in my 3D workstation and wanted to extend the existing configuration with a Tesla Card from Nvidia.
    Because i have a Tesla C2075 in my other workstation i was thinking to combine both cards in my 3D workstation as a Maximus setup.
    Is it possible to drive the configuration with both cards? Or do i need to have a Tesla K20?
    Thanks for your feedback in advance
    René

    [Moved to Hardware forum.]

  • Nvidia Quadro K4000 vs Asus GTX 760. Which one better for AE and Pr ?

    I have 2 Computers and planning to mix them up together as possible. I built a PC with quadro k4000 last year because I was graduated as 3D animator and i plan to work as Animator, plus I also have another PC with GTX 760. and now I'm currently working as Video Editor. so here are my questions:
    - k4000 and gtx 760 which one would do better in AE and Pr ?
    - I read some articles said: "quadro and gtx can group up together in one PC". is it really possible ? because some people said yes and some people said no and some people said yes but wont work together blah blah. I really want to know about it, because right now I already have these 2 GPU. and if YES. can you show me how to do it?
    there are my both PC specs:
    CPU: core i7 3820 3.66hz
    RAM: 16GB
    SSD 128gb
    HDD 3TB
    MotherBoard: Asus P9X79 PRO
    VGA: asus GTX 760
    Another one is:
    CPU core i7-3930K 3.20GHz
    RAM: 32GB
    SSD: 256gb
    HDD: 3TB x 2
    MotherBoard:  ASRock X79 Extreme6
    VGA: quadro k4000
    Can somebody help me to build these 2 PC in just 1 PC as possible ?

    I have something similar that I just posted about - my system has both a GTX780 and a Quadro K4200 installed. Eric is right. They work, but the driver installation can be tricky.
    Mine is a new build and I am trying to learn how the two cards work together. I expected better performance. I don't understand why setting CUDA acceleration to only the GeForce, when NVidia allows for both CUDA GPUs. I tried every combination with no difference in results. So, I will be following your thread to see what happens.

  • Quadro k4000 vs GTX 760. which one for AE

    I have 2 Computers and planning to mix them up together as possible. I built a PC with quadro k4000 last year because I was graduated as 3D animator and i plan to work as Animator, plus I also have another PC with GTX 760. and now I'm currently working as Video Editor. so here are my questions:
    - k4000 and gtx 760 which one would do better in AE and Pr ?
    - I read some articles said: "quadro and gtx can group up together in one PC". is it really possible ? because some people said yes and some people said no and some people said yes but wont work together blah blah. I really want to know about it, because right now I already have these 2 GPU. and if YES. can you show me how to do it?
    there are my both PC specs:
    CPU: core i7 3820 3.66hz
    RAM: 16GB
    SSD 128gb
    HDD 3TB
    MotherBoard: Asus P9X79 PRO
    VGA: asus GTX 760
    Another one is:
    CPU core i7-3930K 3.20GHz
    RAM: 32GB
    SSD: 256gb
    HDD: 3TB x 2
    MotherBoard:  ASRock X79 Extreme6
    VGA: quadro k4000
    Can somebody help me to build these 2 PC in just 1 PC as possible ?

    I have something similar that I just posted about - my system has both a GTX780 and a Quadro K4200 installed. Eric is right. They work, but the driver installation can be tricky.
    Mine is a new build and I am trying to learn how the two cards work together. I expected better performance. I don't understand why setting CUDA acceleration to only the GeForce, when NVidia allows for both CUDA GPUs. I tried every combination with no difference in results. So, I will be following your thread to see what happens.

  • Issue with HP Z820 64GB RAM and dual Quadro K4000's and rendering and playback performance

    I'm having major issues with performance on my system (running windows 8.1. Premiere CC 7.2.2). My friend in the office here has a Mac Pro (2013) with 6 core cpu and dual D500's and I have dual Xeon 2665's and dual K4000's.
    The problem is that he can export twice as fast as me on mercury software and almost 3 times faster on Mercury GPU. He can also add twice as many affects before his system drops frames (using same settings and video file). When I go to GPU-Z my gpu's are hardly working with GPU export selected... with software only my CPU's get to 60% load max whereas his CPU get's to about 84%. Am I missing something? I know the D500's are almost the same as W8000's (and he has two), but dual K4000's shouldn't be that far behind? And how does selecting cpu exporting get him an export time of 6 minutes compared to my 15 minutes when I have a 32 threads to work with??
    Am I doing something wrong? Have I got a setting somewhere that is causing this that I might have missed? Are dual D500's really THAT much better than dual K4000's? AND HOW is my 7k+ machine that much worse than his £3200 mac?
    Please help. I'm losing my mind here!
    Thanks
    Edit - Would just like to add that the video files we are using are pro res 422 and that I have the latest bios and latest nvidia performance drivers

    That HP Z820 should kick the Mac pros butt! For example we run Autodesk Flame systems ( 150k software) on the Z820's with Quadro 6000 cards and they fly. We also had a new mac pro in for testing a few months ago w the dual fire pro cards all decked out and it was crap next the the Z820. Of cource the new MP cant run allot of highend software because of its lack of nvidia support and the firepros lack of open GL but we did run premier and smoke etc  on it for testing. ( Although i thought it looked cool the total lack of exandability and nvida support  was to much so we sent it back). Graphic workstations need PCIe expandability and a choice in GPs.
    Anyhow here are a few observations:
    -Software being used will dertermine the hardware purchased,
    -The dual xeons at the much lower clock speed are meant to work 24/7 like a lamans endurance race, not a sprint race.  Better to get highest frequency xeons.
    -Having dual CPUs with all thoughs cores will only work with a software that is properly mulithreaded, premier is definetly not one of those softwares so you not getting any advantage.
    - the advantage to Quadro cards are much more noticable in 3d tha 2d. If your running Autodesk maya, 3ds max or the recently disscontinued XSI you would be flying compared to the W7000.
    -dual GPU cards do not preform at twice the speed. On average the second card gives about a 10 percent boost.
    -At present ( and as akways) , nividia Quadro drivers are much more uptodate and bug free compared to ATI highend cards. This will inevitably change as openCL over takes openGL, until then Quadros are the clearly superior cards for those with DEEP pockets.
    -I think you would have been far better off with a single Quadro 6000 vs dual K4000s. Also any higher end ATI firepro card would have worked since Premier now uses open CL and no longer needs openGL. Main advantage to Quadro at this point (  besides 3D ) is to be compatible with the most softwares and get the best and most optimized drivers. Firepros will work properly in far fewer softwares at this point but I can see a day over the next few years this may change but not as of yet in 2014. So his W7000 wins this sprint race in this single simple example but in most any other situations your cards will actually work and win. I like saving money like the next guy but I even purchase Quadro cards for my home use and experimenting, but Im not a gamer.
    -FYI: Cuda core count no longer is true measure. For example older Fermi cards worked at twice the frequency than the newer kepler architecture so in effect today you need double ( actually more) the amount of cuda cores to equal the older cards. Also the true compute power in the new Keplers is also much inferior to the older cards.  Its all creative advertiseing today more akin to creative accounting / smoke and mirrors. What im trying to explain is when people read the charts that show the cuda core count and say the higest is best is completely not true. It may have the most "cores" but it will not render correctly, double percision is missing, colors may pop, anti aliasing is inferior and inconsistant,  interaction ( most important) and shaders will be buggy or missing. There are very good reasons people spend money on highend Quadro cards but the charts and reviews generically speaking never understand or can even test for this stuff.
    -Even given the above scenarios your Z820 should be killing your competition. Using a decked out Z820 is way overkill for anything CC. ( Kinda like driving an F1 to get groceries.)  get your HP rep to come over and replace / test your rig. Its free and covered in your coverage.
    I am CLEARLY not a tech guy as my talent in is creation and design but I overhear the tech guys talking.

  • Adobe Premiere Cs6 Windows freezes with Tesla M2090 and Quadro FX 4800

    Premiere works firn with the Quadro FX 4800 in Windows. But I bought a Tesla M2090 and it loses all power. For example a video cannpy be displayed on the monitor screen and if you try to play it on the porgram window, it freezes the whole application. It has to be killed.
    I wonder if anybody ever tested this card. It passes all tests (the M2090) from the Cusa Toolkit.
    Maybe somebody knows a utility to test the Tesla and see if it really works as expected.
    I can open a technical support ticket if it makes sense.
    Update: I moved the Quadro FX and Tesla to a MAC, there is no advantages on speed when exporting a movie. Isn't Premiere supposed to work faster with a Tesla on Mac as well. That is what they told me in tech support. The M2090 does not work in Windows, and in a Mac is not taken into consideration, I guess since Nvidia did not write a Mac driver for this card and it still uses a generic CUDA driver
    I am despondent over this. Adobe support gave me wrong information.

    It is explicitly stated Tesla C2070/2075 and a Quadro card only to achieve a Maxumus configuration, not a very old FX card. Given the limited number of CUDA cores in the Tesla card and the limited bandwidth, the first Maximus results are far from appealing. A Quadro 6000 + Tesla  C2075 (€ 6000) is slower than a GTX 570 for a fraction of the price (€ 270). Talk about BFTB.
    From the documentation I have found about the M2090, for a whopping € 4800, it requires Windows Server 2008, is still based on the Fermi architecture and has the same number of cores as a 580, but less bandwidth.

  • Fine tuning nvidia quadro k4000 to work with premiere pro cc

    Would anyone know the correct settings for nvidia quadro k4000 to work with premiere pro cc please?
    Currently it's only using 33% of it's full power when rendering, while the CPU is running @ 95%
    Mercury playback engine GPU  is selected.
    Thank you in advance

    why would the encoder have the option to choose between mercury playback engine using GPU, or sofware encoding only!
    From the article linked to earlier:
    The video card and hardware MPE is not the holy grail. It helps in some circumstances to improve performance and rather significantly, but in other instances it does not help at all, as is indicated in the link above. People often think that installing a super fast video card will reduce export times by a significant amount of time. That is not true. It only helps in a limited number of situations. Keep in mind that:
    Encoding to an export format is done by the CPU, not the GPU. No performance gain from a video card.
    Frame rate changes, frame blending is done by a suitable video card, for instance exporting to 24P from 29.97i or 60P. Here there is a clear performance gain.
    Scaling is also helped by hardware MPE, for instance going from 4K to HD or from HD to SD. Again a clear performance gain.
    Rendering for preview is helped by the video card only for accelerated effects.

  • I have a video in excellent quality (1280x720 23,976 fps) I burn the dvd in encore cs6 with hd menu and I get pixelated.   I've done transcoding but It downgrade to 480   I need urgent help.

    I have a video in excellent quality (1280x720 23,976 fps) I burn the dvd in encore cs6 with hd menu and I get pixelated.   I've done transcoding but It downgrade to 480   I need urgent help.

    Hi,
    first, sorry if my english sucks jajaa i speach spanish, havent practice my english for a while.
    first i edited my video in premier cc
    sequence 1280X720, 59,94 fps
    48000hz - stereo
    the i linked it with dynamik link to after, make some color correction, etc etc etc
    i renderd in quicktime animation
    my video looks fine in my computer, but when i send my .mov video to encore (cs6) in a HD MENU and standard menú, the image sucks.
    i have done the transcoding in encore, but i doesnt work either. i dont know what else to do.

  • I am trying to save a photoshop CS6 psd file to jpg and get an option jpg, jpg2000 or jpg stereo, I choose jpg and then Mac 256 colours, normal or interlaced.  I just want regular jpg with a high resolution.  What am I doing wrong, never had this problem

    I am trying to save a photoshop CS6 psd file to jpg and get an option jpg, jpg2000 or jpg stereo, I choose jpg and then Mac 256 colours, normal or interlaced.  I just want regular jpg with a high resolution.  What am I doing wrong?  , never had this problem before.  Help!!! 

    Your description of the issue is not clear:
    What format, bit depth and color was your original file "from the net"?  It sounds like it was a Color Indexed GIF, which would cause what you are describing.
    In the Macintosh Finder, select said "net image" and do a Get Info on it (Command+i). When the Info box appears in the Finder, take a screen shot and upload it here by using the little camera icon in the Reply Editor in the forum's web interface.
    If the image is a 256-color GIF, remember the rule:  GIGO = garbage in, garbage out.

  • How to solve illustrator cs6 save as cs5 problem about the stroke(when the stroke with clipping mask and color is gradient, save as cs5 will change to embed ).

    how to solve illustrator cs6 save as cs5 problem about the stroke(when the stroke with clipping mask and color is gradient, save as cs5 will change to embed ).

    Because it was not possible to apply a gradient to a stroke in CS5. When you open the file in CS5, it is reduced to something that can be rendered in CS5.

  • Are Photoshop CS5 and CS6 compatible with Windows 8

    Are Photoshop CS5 and CS6 compatible with Windows 8?

    Yes,  I'm running CS6 on 8.1, and I'm sure CS5 works as well.

  • Photoshop cs6 crashes with "appcrash - module ig75icd64.dll; no problem for a local admin user however. i've tried giving specified user full access to photoshop.exe and set it to Win XP compatibility. how do i fix this without giving user local admin acc

    photoshop cs6 crashes with "appcrash - module ig75icd64.dll; no problem for a local admin user however. i've tried giving specified user full access to photoshop.exe and set it to Win XP compatibility. how do i fix this without giving user local admin access?

    Danny,
    Topic or subject titles should be clear, pertinent and concise so that individual users can tell at a glance if they can help or not.
    That field is not for attempting to fit your entire question in there.
    Please keep this in mind next time you post.  Thank you.

Maybe you are looking for

  • SharePoint 2013 Foundation Search - Change the admin components to the new WFE server

    Hi, We tried to move the Search Service Application from one server to another server which was newly joined in the Farm. In this case,the Search Service in my App server - which was working earlier also did not work. I tried almost all Powershell sc

  • Maximum size for an HttpRequest? Set Content-Length?

    Hi, I'm managing to get small strings sent from my applet to my servlet, but when I try anything bigger, I get problems. Oddly enough, the larger object can get sent to my applet from my servlet without any issues. Can anyone tell me if there is a ma

  • New Mini, YouTube Slow/Clipping/Buffering

    I just hooked up my mini yesterday and wanted to check out videos on YouTube and every video would constantly take forever to load and once started playing it would stop every 10 second to buffer even though it showed (via the red line) it had buffer

  • HT4959 How do I get Apple Mobile Device USB driver?

    How do I obtain an Apple Mobile Device USB driver as without it I cannot load 10.6.1?

  • Difference between FI & CO-PA???

    Hi Experts, We confirmed an production order (related to sales order production). We confirmed zero activity and afterwards zero quantity has been delivered (goods receipt created with zero amount) to stock. By one activity I see following ... Plan q