PS4 News RISE OF THE TOMB RAIDER PS4

Good Evening Folks, Your weekly update on everything Playstation - Check it out https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o1yV01PMsCg

Am no Tomb Raider fan but things like this is really annoying. Things like timed exclusives and exclusive DLC needs to stop. Can't say Sony are doing things like this though. Xbox players won't get to play Shenmue 3 even thought Shenmue 2 was on Xbox and not PlayStation. Also Final Fantasy World and 7 Remaster may not be coming to the Xbox One. If it does they will have to wait for a good amount of time just like Tomb Raider fans on PS4. Absolute no one wins when it comes to timed exclusive games. I can't see this game selling millions of XB1 consoles. By the time it hit's PS4 unless it launches as a PS+ free title anyone who wanted to play it most likely would of. So SE would of missed out on some sales.

Similar Messages

Rise of the Tomb Raider Preorder DLC ?

Preordered the game a month ago and I wanted to make sure that I will receive the sparrowhawk pack because it is actually included as an add-on on the order screen unlike a month ago.

Brian-BBY wrote:
...It’s not uncommon for pre-order bonuses to be announced after any given game is put up for pre-order. When this happens, those who pre-ordered before the bonus was added will not have the Digital Code as a visible item on the order. However, you’ll still receive your code(s), as we go back and capture all of those who pre-ordered. Furthermore, the only time you’d need to cancel and replace your pre-order is if said pre-order bonus is a physical item, such as a SteelBook...
Mod response on an earlier post.

Tomb Raider Definitive Edition - Xbox One

I live in Richmond, VA and I have been trying to find copies of Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition for the Xbox One. Every store I went to says that they don't have the game in stock and don't have any info on if they will ever get a copy.
Today they found a single copy for me at a store that's more than an hour away (Virginia Beach). Is this expected?
I was just a bit offput because I wanted to buy the game and the employees in the stores seemed confused that they would not get copies of a new game.

Hello masenkablast,
Tomb Raider Definitive Edition has been pretty popular since it was released two weeks ago. It can be difficult to say precisely when stores will get new shipments of certain titles and I apologize if your closest stores don’t currently have any.
One thing to keep in mind is that there are two SKUs for the Xbox One version. The first one, SKU 3201119, was initially only available for pre-order and I don’t expect stores to receive more. The second, SKU 3098037, should be replenished at stores, it’s just hard to say when the Richmond, VA area will get more. While it may not be available in your nearest store right now, it looks like there is the ship-to-store option to have one sent there specifically for you.
Hopefully you’re able to get a copy soon, and please feel free to let me know if you have any additional questions.
Sincerely,
Matt|Senior Social Media Specialist | Best Buy® Corporate
Private Message

BURN THIS MOTHER DOWN - New Domain rises from the ash

We are planning a physical move of our single office lat 2016 early 2017. I have been tasked with creating a wishlist of hardware for the new location, Servers, Switches, Workstations the whole enchilada. Nothing unusual about this I know. The really challenging thing is thus:CEO asks since we have Office 365 E3 why do we need to maintain an Exchange server on premise, can we get rid of it when we move to the new locale? After some cursory research it seems that MS best practice pretty much states "If you have Exchange (we're on 2010 SP2 RU10 in Hybrid Mode) trying to remove it is "bad", like crossing the streams in Ghostbusters one would think, and to leave it in the environment. So I tell him this, he says "since we have this split domain why don't we stand up a whole new domain at the new location with a single domain name and ditch...
This topic first appeared in the Spiceworks Community

Getting the following javascript errors with IE8. We have multiple tabs in the help desk portal which show up as blank pages. Everything was working fine in 6.x.Webpage error detailsUser Agent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 8.0; Windows NT 5.1; Trident/4.0; .NET CLR 1.1.4322; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; .NET CLR 3.0.4506.2152; .NET CLR 3.5.30729; .NET4.0C; InfoPath.3)Timestamp: Mon, 13 Jul 2015 00:16:35 UTCMessage: Expected identifier, string or numberLine: 44131Char: 83Code: 0URI: https://helpdesk:9676/assets/all_bundle.js?7400070Message: 'Ajax' is undefinedLine: 471Char: 1Code: 0URI: https://helpdesk:9676/assets/portal.js?7400070Message: Object doesn't support this property or methodLine: 26Char: 7Code: 0URI: https://helpdesk:9676/portal/page/6-avatar-correctionsMessage: 'SPICEWORKS' is undefinedLine: 2Char: 1Code: 0URI: ...

Tomb Raider requirements

Hello Forum! I need help playing the new Tomb Raider game! The problem is, it appears that I don't have the system requirements. in short...
I have a mid 2009 macbook pro unibody
-Processor: 2.66GHz intel Core 2 Duo
-Memory: 4 GB 1067 MHz DDR3
-Graphics: NVIDIA GeForce 9400M 256 MB
-OSX 10.9.4
-A storage drive upgrade to a 1TB hybrid SATA disk
The problem is this... The graphics card is not up to the games requirements, which is 512 MB. I have found a card at iFixit, which is a Dual Graphics:
A bump up to 2.8 GHZ processor
AND
the dual graphics cards:
NVIDIA GeForce 9400M
NVIDIA GeForce 9600M GT with 512 MB of GDDR3 VRAM
There is one more problem: The game says it doesn't support the NVIDIA 9000 series card!!!! AAAARRRRRGGGGHHHH!!!!!!!
Is there any way I can make this work. I haven't bought the game or any other upgrades.... yet. I don't want to blow money on something worthless. I plan on upgrading the RAM and have no problem upgrading my logic board, or anything else. Is there a way to get a different graphics chip/card to go on the board? How can I make this work!!!!?????
Thank you all so much for your help.

Hello Rvlvr_OcelScott,
I am sorry to hear that your order was not fulfilled in accordance with the process we put in place for this title. It was not our intent for orders to be cancelled when submitted for in-store pickup. I am glad you were able to find the Limited Edition game that you were seeking, and I hope we are able to provide you with a better shopping experience in the future.
Sincerely,
Mike|Social Media Specialist | Best Buy® Corporate
Private Message

New Xserve in the rack....where do I go from here?

Well, our shiny new (and unexpectedly deep and heavy) Xserve arrived this morning, and has been installed in the rack cabinet at our new premises. I think I need help knowing where to go from here on a couple of points.....
I've been wading through pages of PDF manuals, support pages and forums posts and – to be honest – my head's in a mess!! I'm hoping some of you nice folks out there (Camelot provided some very useful advice in previous posts) could offer me some direction, so I can work out what I need to work out, and understand what I'm doing so I can get this beast up and running.
Having also bought a couple of Netgear GS724T switches, I had planned to setup a 4gbps trunk between the Xserve and the first switch (with a second 4gbps connection between the switches). We will use an Airport Extreme Base Station as our DHCP server, and I will likely assign static IPs to both the switches whilst configuring them for trunk operation. Things are slightly complicated by the fact that our new BT Versatility installation already appears to have a 4-port wireless router bolted on, but I think we can effectively bypass this straight to the AEBS....
In order to use link aggregation (i.e. the 4gbps connection to the Xserve), will I need to configure Server first using only 1 ethernet connection? Can I do this 'headless' – I have installed all the Admin Tools (and documentation!!) on my MacBook Pro.... Also, can I even use link aggregation in a 'basic' Standard Server configuration, or will I need to use Advanced?
We choose to purchase 3x 300Gb 15k SAS drives and therefore also have the RAID card installed. My understanding is that the Server software will be installed in drive 1 (left hand bay), and simply needs 'configured' (did I say 'simply'??!). I also believe I could – without re-installing the OS – changed the setup to RAID5 if I wanted to. I think I need to do this using Disk Utility whilst the Xserve is booted via the install DVD – correct? Can I setup disk mirroring without re-installing, and is the process the same (i.e. boot from DVD, change the setup, re-boot)?
We run Filemaker Server, and I wondered which initial setup option would be optimal – NO raid, with the OS on one drive, and the database file(s) on another; or one big RAID5 volume with everything on it? I guess with 3 internal drives, we could go for a single drive (OS) plus a 2-drive RAID for files (either mirrored or striped for speed). If we bolt on a couple of 500Gb Firewire drives which we have 'spare' that would allow for backups of both volumes.....?
Putting everything into consideration, I want to take 'baby steps' with the setup, until I get my head round everything. Initially, all we need is Filemaker and remote access to our databases (through VPN I guess), although I want to add web/mail/iCal etc..etc.. once we've settled into the new offices.
The whole DNS thing scares me a bit. I can arrange reverse DNS with BT, and point our domain (via FastHosts) to our public IP address so we can run our own Web and Email server. I'm just not convinced this won't be a security vulnerability.....
I'm a long time Mac user, but I've never used Server, and I rarely use Terminal. This new Xserve venture is exciting, but it also feels a bit un-nerving.... and advice, input and further reading suggestions would be gratefully received!
Thanks in advance.

In order to use link aggregation (i.e. the 4gbps connection to the Xserve), will I need to configure Server first using only 1 ethernet connection?
Ahh, setting up Link Aggregation while headless is always a concern since it will affect the network connection you're using to administer the box. It is possible to do, it just takes some planning. If you can, configure the link over the serial port using networksetup, or put a monitor on the server temporarily.
Also, can I even use link aggregation in a 'basic' Standard Server configuration, or will I need to use Advanced?
I believe so - 'basic' vs. 'Advanced' only controls the set of services that are run and simplifies the admin interface somewhat. I don't think it has any effect on the underlying network setup but I might be wrong (I've never used anything but advanced).
I also believe I could – without re-installing the OS – changed the setup to RAID5 if I wanted to
No, that is not possible. Converting to RAID 5 will destroy the current config and reformat the drives. You can migrate to a RAID 1 or RAID 0 array, but not to RAID 5.
Can I setup disk mirroring without re-installing, and is the process the same (i.e. boot from DVD, change the setup, re-boot)?
For simple mirroring you can use RAID Admin's Migrate option to migrate the current single drive to a new mirror on the other two drives. The you can re-use the original drive.
We run Filemaker Server, and I wondered which initial setup option would be optimal
In general, RAID 5 is not recommended for database use - or any other use that requires a lot of random writes, although it does depend on volume - if your traffic is sufficiently light it might not be an issue.
Other than that, for most people the data is most important, so that should be mirrored. It's reasonably easy to reinstall the OS (at least compared to rebuilding all your data.
Putting everything into consideration, I want to take 'baby steps' with the setup.
To start, focus on the disks. Everything else (applications, services, network, etc.) can be reworked easily later on. Not so with the disks.
The whole DNS thing scares me a bit.
Use BT for your public DNS for sure, but you'll definitely benefit from having working internal DNS, and that's pretty easy to manage, at least for small networks.
so what DNS name do I use locally when configuring Server?
You can use anything you like. You can use ourcompany.com - the same as your public domain, but just have to realize that 'server.ourcompany.com' may mean different things depending on whether you're inside your network querying your own DNS server, or external querying BTs (BT will return 12.34.56.78 while your internal DNS would return the 192.168.100.x address).
This confuses me (from setup guide):
Ignore the statement in the setup guide. It's perfectly valid to have 'server.domain.com' hosting email for [email protected].
Do I need to consult our ISP about what DNS name I should give our server
If you're running your own internal DNS then no, not at all.
You only need to involve BT for any externally-available hostnames (and they don't even have to match your internal names - it's fine to have 'server.domain.com' on your internal DNS but no 'server.domain.com' in your public DNS, it just means no one can get to 'server.domain.com' from outside your network.
Filemaker recommends you use the scheduling facility in FMServer for backups, and not system backups
This is absolutely the case - it's hard to make backups of active/open files, especially databases. Any backup takes time - you read the first byte at time 0, but might not get to the last byte until several minutes later - and you have to consider what happens to changes in between (some may be backed up if they happened before the backup reached that part of the file, others might not, leading to an inconsistent file).
Filemaker's backup method ensures you have a valid backup of the data.
I'm now thinking that mirroring the OS on drive 2 might be a good idea, whilst storing Filemaker files in a 'Databases' folder on drive 3 (which is backed up my FMServer schedule). Other 'Shared' folder(s) on drive 3 could be backed up via Time Machine to an external FW800 drive......
This really depends on the frequency of change in your database. If it's mostly reads and not many inserts/updates, then reverting to yesterdays backup might not be a problem, but if your data changes constantly it might not be as good.

MSI K7T266 Pro2-RU - problem with the lite-raid - would like to use it as a normal ide

Hi!
I tried to install a single drive on the raid-controller and create a single array for it.
For some reason the disk management in Windows XP does not see it, even though
I have updated the related drivers. However, the Disk management showed it the first time after I had installed the HD onto the raid, but as I could not do anything intelligent with Disk management in regard of the HD, I removed the drive from Disk management with that effect that the disk management does not recognize the drive at all, even though I have now re-created the array on the risk, disabled and enabled raid on the Bios.
I read that there exists modified bios for MSI KT3 Ultra ARU BIOS, which will turn the Raid into regular IDE. That would be something that would most probably be the best way to proceed for me. However, do such bioses exist for MSI K7T266 Pro2-RU? Any other suggestions on how to get the disk management to succeed in recornizing the IDE on the raid-controller would be good to hear as well.
Yours sincerely,
Tero

Ok, I tried updating with the hacked 3.7 Full Raid Bios. Now I seem to have another problem: even though the hacked bios recognizes my HD, it thinks it's about 130 GB, when it in reality would be 250 GB. The hacked bios seems to work ok with Disk Management in Windows XP too, so it's a shame that the hacked bios doesn't seem to have a support for large disks. On the other hand the link at Lumberjacker was dead for the hacked bios v3.6, I would have tried it, if it would have provided me with a good solution to my problem.
I then went back and installed the official v3.7 bios and the lite raid does now recognize the HD being 250 GB, but the Disk Management just states "Missing" in regard of the HD and does not let me do anything fruitful with it. I looked the HD's properties and the Device Manager just states "Hardware device not connected code 45".
How in earth could I manage to make this work now (I do not want to move my other HD:s as they are full of stuff and don't want to risk losing any content)?
General specs of the computer: IDE 1: 60 GB and 120 GB Matrox, IDE 2: Nec2500 and Sony DVD-Rom, Athlon 1800+ XP, 512 MB memory, Ati 9700 np, Network adapter card. The new HD to be added is a 250 GB WD (have removed the jumper)
Thank you for any tips,
Tero

Transparent integration of a new drive into the folder structure of a file server?

Hallo,
I'm looking for solution to a problem, that seams to be simple, but obviously is not that easy to solve:
I have to integrate a second external RAID system in to our MacOS X 10.6.8 Server based file sharing server that is accessed from Mac and Windows clients via AFP and SMB. I want to move one or two main folders from the old RAID to the new one, but this physical change has to be invisible to the users, as I don't want to confuse anyone.
So my idea was to mover the Folders to the new drive, and create symbolic links at the old locations pointing to the new locations. This works very well for the Windows clients accessing the server via SMB, but does not work for the Macs on AFP.
So I tried to move one folder to the new drive and mount it at the old location. Again this works fine for the SMB but does not work for AFP, the mount point does not show up in a directory listing via AFP.
Do you have any other idea how I might integrate the new drive in transparent way into the old folder structure?
Thanks for your input
Florian
PS: I could use SMB on the Macs but for some reason I, whenever I try to log into the server from a Mac via SMB, user name and password are accepted, but then the Mac client displays a message saying that I don't have the right to access the share. The same share works using AFP.

Define 'invisible' please.
Do you mean you need to be able to do this live, while users are on the system? or just that you can shut the machine down, reconfigure it, and bring it back up with the new configuration, even though the shares look the same to the users?
I'm guessing the latter, but it's worth asking.
Ultimately the problem lies in the way the file sharing systems deal with multi-volume sharepoints, and it's not easy. If you think about it, say you have a 1TB array handling the main sharepoint and you want to substitute one of the directories in that sharepoint with a new, empty 4TB array.
When the user mounts the sharepoint they get a little status bar at the bottom of the window showing the available space... how much is that? Well, initially it would be however much of the 1TB volume is unused... except if they switch to the linked directory they now have 4TB available (or thereabouts)... so the amount of space available has changed even though, from the user's standpoint, they're still on the same share.
It isn't valid for the OS to report 4 TB as free because that isn't the case unless you're in this specific directory.
It also isn't valid for the OS to report 5TB free, even though there is that amount of space altogether.
It also isn't valid for the OS to report 1TB free because you could upload 4TB of data if you put it in the right place.
There are few solutions to this. Microsoft sort of addressed this with their DFS solution in Windows Server, but it's not trivial.
Unfortunately you can't just blow it off and ignore the issue.
Off hand there's only one thing I can think of that *might* work. if it doesn't then you're down to using multiple sharepoints on the server, with users mounting both disks simultaneously (which can be automated, for what it's worth).
The one thing to try is to statically mount the second RAID at the appropriate location so that, as far as the OS is concerned, it looks like just another directory even though it's on a different disk. You'd do this by editing /etc/fstab and adding a line like
UUID=AABBCCDD-79F7-33FF-BE85-41DFABE2E2BA /path/to/mount hfs rw
to /etc/fstab (this file may not currently exist, so just create it as root).
The first field is the UUID of the drive (which you can get via diskutil info)
The second field is the path where you want this drive to appear in the filesystem - i.e. somewhere in the path of your sharepoint. There must be an existing (empty) directory at this path when the disk mounts.
The third field identifies the disk as HFS
The fourth field marks the disk as read-write
Now when the system boots it should locate this disk and mount it on top of the existing RAID volume. If you cd to your sharepoint you should see the existing drive and if you cd from there into your mounted directory you should be looking at your new RAID.
Now, this all works fine (or, at least, should do) from a standard OS standpoint. The big question is whether the AFP and SMB daemons honor and support this kind of setup... there's one way to try, of course...
Now for testing purposes you could mount it at a dummy directory, just to see whether it's available to network clients. If it is then your next step would be to clone the data from the directory onto the new drive, then edit the fstab to mount the disk at the appropriate location.
Note also that the entire volume will replace the directory you mount over - that means you can't replace two (or more) directories with one volume, but you can, of course, partition or setup your RAID into multiple volumes and mount each individual volume over a specific directory.

Unable to install tomb raider underworld

unable to install tomb raider underworld it shows that the setup is detect tomb raider is already install on your machine but i dont have any installed tomb raider. please help me..

Hello,
I'd ask in the Windows forum on Microsoft Community. or the
Windows Store forum on Microsoft Community.
Karl
When you see answers and helpful posts, please click Vote As Helpful, Propose As Answer, and/or Mark As Answer.
My Blog: Unlock PowerShell
My Book:
Windows PowerShell 2.0 Bible
My E-mail: -join ('6F6C646B61726C406F75746C6F6F6B2E636F6D'-split'(?<=\G.{2})'|%{if($_){[char][int]"0x$_"}})

Why can't I donwload Tin Tin movie trailer? Or The Rise of the Apes trailer?

Why is it that when I go into iTunes store to Theatrical Trailers and click on new Tin Tin trailer the store always comes up with "cannot complete your request....the store may be busy"? Same thing on the Rise of the Planet of the Apes, that one hasn't worked since it was posted on April 14.

I've experienced the same thing going back to December 2010 or earlier and have many notes on what trailer links are broken. I've reported this to Apple Care iTunes Division and they don't seem to know what's going on.
One tech, in a moment of candor, agreed that the link wasn't working for him either and that he would report it. Checking back to that link since, it's never been repaired (Tree of Life). The different people I've communicated with have reported it "upstairs", but still it keeps happening, and oddly, it's a frequent problem with high profile releases like Tin Tin or Rise of the Planet of the Apes.
Even worse news? The WHOLE theatrical trailers link is now gone from iTunes (unless it's moved somewhere and I can't find it). It's definitely not where it was Monday when I last used it.
So I'd guess that the whole section has problems and they've hidden it until a solution is figured out. I really hope that it will reappear because it's my understanding that Apple Trailers have been a big success for promoting Quicktime and the Apple Brand in general. From the industry standpoint, I've read outside accounts that the industry greatly values Apple's free offering in this area and the obvious publicity the movies receive. I just hope Apple or the Studios won't start charging for them!

Bluetooth issues with the new iOS or the iPhone 5?

The Bluetooth I use in my car used to pair and connect automatically. After upgrading my OS and from the 4 to the 5 everytime I attempt to use my bluetooth it says out of range. I need to "Forget this Device" and re-pair it. Has anyone else had this issue? Would it be with the OS software or the new phone?

Nope.......Apple has created new software. Now other developers need to rise to the challenge of updating their software. With my car I had trouble with weird stuff. I called the dealer and come to find out there was an update. So my question to the dealer was how are you notifying the customers. They were letting customers contact them. Which I think is wrong, but seriously this is relatively new to dealerships. My guess is it will be different in the future, but when?
Think about apps......some apps won't run or run as well with the new OS. Those developers have to update the apps to work with OS8. It's the same thing.
Like I said, mine didn't initially work, but I deleted it and rediscovered it and it's good. Now, in a couple of years? Who knows.

Configuring my new Mac Pro with a RAID solution... Help appreciated!

Hi, I am about to purchase a new Mac Pro to have in my studio.
One of my unresolved features is what to do with storage. Currently I am considering either: (a) the Apple internal RAID card with 4x500GB 7200 RPM drives; or an external G-Technology G-Speed eS also with 4x500GB 7200 RPM.
In either of these cases I would have an additional external drive of 1.5TB (pretty much the available storage I should have from the RAID), to perform back-up and take off-site.
Questions:
(1) Anyone has experience with Apple's Raid Card? Better or worse than an external solution?
(2) Any feedback on the storage from G-Tech? I have a few mini drives with great success.
(3) Any suggestion on RAID vendors (beyond what I am considering)?
Thanks so much!

I'm also planning to upgrade to a new Mac Pro, and just waiting for newest Intel "Penryn" processors:
http://buyersguide.macrumors.com/
Having eSATA ports for external eSATA drives would be great.
I will go with a RAID, but haven't decided on the configuration - I'm thinking of having 3 or 4 drives in RAID 5; I perceive a benefit in going with the Apple RAID card rather than a cheaper third party card - it's designed to work well with the Mac Pro and with Apple Care you'd get warranty coverage. Can't decide if it's better to save money and buy drives from a third party (and maybe end up with them not covered by Apple Care), or to pay more and get the drives with the machine.
I got burned many years ago by four failed IBM 75GXP hard drives, so I think choosing a reliable hard drive is very important; I'll probably go with a Seagate Barracuda 7200.11 or Hitachi Deskstar 7K1000. Great info here:
http://www.storagereview.com/1000.sr
Good RAID tests results:
http://www.macintouch.com/reviews/macpro/followup.html
And I think this is required reading too:
http://manuals.info.apple.com/en/RAIDUtility_UserGuide.pdf
Ron

[915 Series] How do I enable the IDE raid Slots (the yellow ones)

On the Bios there is an option to enable the onboard raid slots, but whem I
enable it, noting happens, and in the next restart, this item doen't show in
the bios menu.
I read on the forum that this problem appened to other owners of this
motherboard, but I couldn't find any solution.
I've already installed the Via IDE Raid Drivers in "»Windows install »F6."
When I tried to install the upgrade of this drivers form the Drives&
utilities CD, a message apeard saying that it could't find the hardware, so I
installed them anyway from a floppy disk in "»Windows install »F6."
I have connected to the blue IDE slot one IDE drive and one DVD drive, and
in the second slot(yellow), another IDE drive.I've tried to exange the drive
positions but the drives on the raid slots where never recognized.
I know from the forums that others have solved this problem, so I think this
is not a mainboard mailfunction.
Please someone help me in this issue.
Thank you.

Tanks everyone
I also tried that procedure but I thik i have a problem in Bios or in the motherboard.
When I enable The raid controler in Bios this Item just disapears form the options, next time I restart.
Strange, no?
No mater I took the computer to the shop where I bought the Moterboard and monday, I hope I have good News.
At that time I'll give you notice of what's happening.
See you
"My Gear: Motherboard MSI 915G Neo2 Platinum
Pentium 4 3.0GHz 630
1024 Mb of ram oem
Graphic card Nvidia Geforce 6200
HDD Hitachi IDE 80Gb 7200 133
HDD SCSI II 37Gb and PCI Controler Adaptec
Drive DVD Recorder LG GSA 4163B
Drive DVD Player Toshiba
Sound Card Digidesign Digi 001

HT201272 I typed in a digital copy code to get Rise of the Guardians on here because I bought the blu-ray, but the digital copy won't download no matter what I do. Why won't it download? Right now I am very angry for not getting the digital copy.

I purchased Rise of the Guardians on blu-ray, I typd in the digital copy code that came in the case, the ituns extras downloaded, but no matter what I do, the digital copy of the actual movie won't download. Why won't it download? I've tried everything I could think of, but nothing works, it just simply does not want to download.

Ok, a new digital copy of Rise of the Guardians started downloading automatically at no extra cost, I admit that I was thrilled, but now my happiness is gone because the new digital copy of Rise of the Guardians simply won't play. Nothing works with it except for the iTunes extras again. I'm getting really tired of this. Why won't it play and why give a digital copy if it refuses to work? Please someone help me out here!

Mac OS X does not recognize the increased capacity of the Xserve Raid

The Xserve raid recognizes the increased capacity of 4.09TB per controller however. When the arrays are opened in Disk Utilty on the Mac Pro it shows 2TB and 1.4 for the other. When creating the arrays I originally had four 750GB for the top and three 750GB for the bottom controller.
I have followed through with expanding the array's then merging the slices for adding additional HDD's as detailed in Apple support.
Am I doing something wrong? Please help.
Tony

Yes rebooted nothing unfortunately. I think I've solved it though, was reading somewhere you basically need to start again. So I've deleted the array added the extra HDD's to the new 2nd array and I'll see if it's worked 50 hrs from now. Really wish apple would come clean about the capabilities of their hardware.

PS4 News RISE OF THE TOMB RAIDER PS4

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for