Pscs 4 adding new camera profiles

adobe customer support doesn't support ps4 or bridge so when i bought a new camera i can't use bridge v3.0.0. and ps 4 v 11.02 to open and work on photos, running OSX 10.4.11 on a dual core macbook pro.when i tried to update camera raw v5 to v5.6 i got an error message then updater detected a new version than v5.6 yet i can't find it using spotlight nor lookin gthru hds.
so without any direction i drug & droped the G12 profiles into Lib>ap spport>adobe>camera raw>camera profiles>camera with shows the profiles but ps & bridge isn't able to acess them.
the question is how do i download the new canon G 12 camera profiles in computer so bridge & PS can edit files or do i just give up?
thank you
jene

G12 isn't supported directly in CS4/ACR5.x.
You need to use DNG to get support for that camera in CS4:
Why doesn’t my version of Photoshop or Lightroom support my camera?: http://adobe.ly/ACRandDNG

Similar Messages

New camera profile not "appearing" in ACR, but does in Lightroom

I recently created a camera profile for a Nikon D200, using an X-Rite Colorchecker chart photo and the Chart feature in the DNG Editor. I exported the camera profile. When I go to the Calibration tab in ACR 5.5, the new profile does not appear in the drop down list with the other camera profiles. However, when I go to the Develop module in Lightroom 2.5, the new profile does appear in the drop down list there.
I am running Windows 7. Snooping around my root drive I find that if I look within the Users\User Name\AppData\Roaming\Adobe\CameraRaw\CameraProfiles directory (referenced in the Fraser and Schewe CS4 Camera Raw book as the Vista location for the profiles) I can find no camera profiles and when I place the new profile there it still does not appear in ACR. When I look in ProgramData\Adobe\CameraRaw\CameraProfiles\Camera\Nikon D200 directory I can see the regular set of camera profiles for the camera, as well as the one I created, but as I previously stated, the newly created profile does not appear in the ACR list.
A side note - I did some experimentation with camera profile names. I added "XX" to the end of the Nikon Vivid profile name (not the extension), and then that profile no longer appears in the ACR list of profiles. I removed the extra letters and then the profile reappears in the ACR list of profiles. Seemed odd behavior to me. I also noticed that the profile I created with DNG Editor is noticeably smaller than the others provided by Adobe (28K compared to 110k).
Hope someone has a suggestion for me.

Your reminder about both Photoshop (main) and Bridge needing to be shut down for changes to take effect reminded me that I had Bridge set to "auto-start at log-in". So I checked and it was still running (shown with the other hidden icons). When I "shut it down" from the UI I had thought it was fully terminated. So I completely shut Bridge down, restarted, and the new profile now appears.
Thanks for the reminder/pointer in the right direction.

New Camera Profiles and very high ISO files

I am having some difficulty directing this 'beta' comment as there no longer seems to be a Labs forum for the new Profiles. My apologies, if necessary, for therefore intruding on a user-to-user.
Also, to add to my misdemeanours, I previously posted the following (slightly amended here) in the LR forum - which again may be not the ideal place.
"I have been really impressed with the camera profiles - in my case the Standard NEF for a D3 - and posted a complimentary message to that effect on the Labs LR beta2 forum under the pseudonym Rockshead.
The revelation that each profile is camera specific raises a particular question about that for the D3. Whilst the conversions at 'normal' ISO ratings are - as I said - stunning; the same cannot be said of those for the very high ISO numbers available with the D3; compared to the conversion of the same in View/CaptureNX. Applying LR noise reduction - by the bucket load - cerrtainly aids the definition, but has little effect on the colour differences.
I suppose my question is, is this something that we have to live with; or is there hope for the future that this will be able to be sorted by further tweak of the profiles. I can quite understand if this is element of the conversion is another ingredient of Nikon's secret sauce, and therefore outside of Adobe's future thinking? Nevertheless, it would be interesting to know the thinking.
Let me hasten to say, I am content to live with it for the relatively few ultra high ISO pictures I deal with. No complaints at all from me on the brilliant way Adobe has tackled the camera profile upgrade. Nevertheless, regular use of high ISOs is coming, and so it is a legitimate question,"

> Whilst the conversions at 'normal' ISO ratings are - as I said - stunning; the same cannot be said of those for the very high ISO numbers available with the D3; compared to the conversion of the same in View/CaptureNX. Applying LR noise reduction - by the bucket load - cerrtainly aids the definition, but has little effect on the colour differences
1. Can if you can provide a documentation for such color differences in form of a raw file and pointing out some differences caused by the conversion?
2. "Very high ISO numbers" is not very specific. I wonder if you are aware of the fact, that your camera's highest real ISO setting is 6400. The settings 12800 and 25600 are eye-wash, meant only for those creating JPEG in-camera.

Latest Update: New Camera Profiles for the D700 (Version 4)

I see with the latest update of Lightroom brought with it version 4 of the camera profiles. I've dabbled with using several of them, especially the Camera Portrait. I have versions that consist of for example:
Camera Portrait
Camera Portrait beta 2
Camera Portrait v3
Camera Portrait v4
Of course, the previous versions can be left as is however the list I have now is quite long and wanted to know if I would be missing out if I were to discard/delete previous versions and just keep the v4's.
I realize this is personal preference however are the newest versions (version 4) for Camera D2X, Camera Landsape, Camera Neutral, Camera Portrait, Camera Standard and Camera Vivid for the D700 all one needs for the average Lightroom user?
Thanks in advance.

Thank you all for giving me your advice. Like kbkbn said, the older versions don't do anything by being there and you never know if you want to use one of them in the future. I will start using the version 4 profiles and compare them more to the older versions. Thanks again.
Are there any other worthwhile sources of profiles? I do have a few I created myself with my Color Checker Passport for specific shooting locations in my yard for specific times of days.
Thanks again.

Problem with adding new ICM profile to Color management (Print Section)

I have a problem when selecting other in profile to switch from Managed by Printer. The dialog that is supposed to appear, does not. I am using window XP sp2. Once I select "other" to add new selectable profile, the lightroom app locks up waiting for me to perform some selections of profile. But because no dialog appear, I am only left with escape to get out of the mode therefore reverting to "Managed by printer" option. This is unfortunately not an acceptable option for me.
Has anybody experienced such problems?
Thanks
Eric

Probably the same problem as where the export panel appears off screen. Apparently, you can hit alt+space+m and move the dialog back into your display. See here:
Kelley Hood, "LR2 Export dialogue box will not appear - HELP!" #10, 1 Sep 2008 12:40 pm
Try it. Might work.

DNG Profile Editor (& new camera profiles)

Anybody who thinks Camera Raw can't pretty much nail the colors of the camera makers colors should check out http://labs.adobe.com/wiki/index.php/DNG_Profiles
You'll need Camera Raw 4.5 or Lightroom 2.0 to use the profiles...

WS Lam wrote:
>I have one problem though... many of my photos of the color chart are overexposed?! I have color charts shooting with Nikon D3, D300, D700... many of them the editor think is overexposed. My Canon ones are ok (1Ds MKIII/1DMKIII/5D), but the Nikon ones are all overexposed....? Shot with Matrix in Av mode.
ACR and DNG assign a baseline exposure of +0.5 EV to Nikon D3 raw files, and I think does the same with the D300 and D700. This causes the image to appear over exposed when rendered in ACR. Many Nikon users use a default negative exposure correction of -0.5 EV in ACR to negate this baseline exposure. See the DNG specification for a description of the baseline exposure offset.
I don't know how this affects the new calibration procedure.
http://www.adobe.com/products/dng/pdfs/dng_spec.pdf
For my observations on this baseline exposure and comments by Eric Chan and others, see this thread:
http://www.adobeforums.com/webx/.59b4d54f

ICC Profiles in the new Camera Profile Editor

Hi Folks,
I'm wondering if anyone knows why we aren't (yet) able to assign ICC profiles directly in the Camera Raw module, rather than working from the profile editor? Is this essentially a proprietary technology or trademark issue, and thus not something to be implemented into ACR in the future?
By all means, feel free to add any background to this conversation that you wish - I'm admittedly ignorant on the trade issues involved here, and certainly don't wish to add any ill will. Just looking to understand how these (still) emergent technologies are shaking out and interfacing with the ACR workflow.
Thanks

Ah, indeed. Thanks R.
And for those interested, here's a great response, courtesy of the one and only Mr. F:
http://forums.adobe.com/message/1210888#1210888
That said, all other follow-ups welcomed, though my own question is answered.

I would like to add a new Canon camera profile to the RAW interface

Hi, I would like to add a new Canon camera profile to the RAW interface.
I have recently installed the new camera profile 'Studio Portrait' which i download from here:
http://www.canon.co.jp/imaging/picturestyle/file/studio-portrait.html
When I open up a RAW files in Camera RAW, go to 'Camera Calibration', click on the drop down list called
'Camera Profile' I only see 'Adobe Standard, Faithful etc etc'.
My questions are, can i add the same camera profile i put in my camera, into a folder with in photoshop?
Or is photoshop reading the raw file and only seeing the default camera profiles?
If I could see the new camera profile listed it would help with work flow.
Best
JL-B
Please help, ive not had a good time waiting on the phone and trying to explain this to a live chat, hours have been wasted. Once i know the answer I can get back to the commission.

Are you following this
Apply a camera profile
To apply a camera profile, select it from the Camera Profile pop-up menu in the Camera Calibration tab of the Camera Raw dialog box. The Adobe Standard profile for a camera is named Adobe Standard. Camera Matching profiles include the prefix Camera in the profile name. The Camera Profile pop-up menu displays only profiles for your camera.
If the only profile in the Camera Profilemenu is Embedded, it means that you have selected a TIFF or JPEG image. Adobe Standard and Camera Matching profiles work only with raw images.
Note: If you have selected a raw file and Adobe Standardand Camera Matching profiles do not appear in the Camera Profilepop-up menu, download the latest Camera Raw update.

How do I install a camera profile into CS2 raw converter

I recently purchased a ColorChecker Passport and along with the software, created a camera profile for my Olympus E-300. The CCP software crated a camera profile that was duly placed into the c:\users\<username>\AppData\Roaming\adobe\cameraraw\cameraprofile\olumpus e-300 Directory. When I open an olympus ORF raw file from cs2 or bridge, and select the calibrate tab the only thing that is available in the camera calibrate box is ACR 2.4. Clicking the drop down arrow doesn't show anything else.
I have turned off colormanagement in photoshop.
Can anybody tell me how I can get photo shop to recognize the new camera profile?
I have tried restarting photoshop and Bridge after the DCp file was added to teh directory.
ACR verssion 3.7(?)
OS is windows home 64
8 gigs of ram
Photoshop cs2 version 9.0.1
adobe bridge cs2 version 1.0.4.6
I have also performed the same tasks on photoshop cs3 on my work computer with the same results.

The earliest version of Camera Raw to use DNG Profiles was version 4.6 in Photoshop CS3...so, you won't be able to use that DNG profile in ACR 3.7.

Time frame for Camera Profile Beta?

What might be Adobe's thinking in terms of releasing a final version of the new Camera Profiles? Not as idle a question as it might seem. It sounds like many LR users have added a new profile as an automatic Import choice; and as the weeks go by, significant numbers of photos must have been given one of these excellent developments as a starting point for further tweaking.
As the profiles are in public beta, and Adobe Labs state they want user import before finalizing the release; it is germane to ask to what degree does Adobe plan - or indeed need to plan - to provide compatibility between a series of profiles that might be subject to further modification, and those applied during the interim (beta) period? And also how long that interim period is likely to last?

The beta profiles will never just disappear. When we do release the final profiles, they will be installed such that both profiles appear in the calibration popup. The beta profiles will only go away if you manually delete them.
If the user choses to manually delete the beta profiles, Camera Raw/Lightroom will automatically switch any previously adjusted images using the beta profiles to the final profiles with the same base name.

Thinking behind 'beta' as in Camera Profiles

It would be interesting to hear some guidance on the Beta part of the new Camera Profiles title. Particularly as there is now word of a Beta 2.
It is hardly a scientific survey, but from what I have seen on this and the ACR forum, I would have said that since their introduction there has been nary a word said against them. And certainly little in the way of suggested improvements. The response from users appears to be wholly positive. But then again there has never been a forum dedicated to feedback.
Are there folk in the background providing constructive feedback which will be implemented into improvements to those that already exist? And will those improvements be in Beta 2? Or will this retain the existing profiles and only add additional ones for newly introduced cameras? And if the former, will there be further improvements added to further Beta numbers; or is the plan at some stage to finalise the existing profiles as a firm release?
There are after all, I would surmise, many thousands of images already treated to the existing excellent profiles. It would be great to know a little of what the future holds.

Hi everyone,
Our basic plan at this time is to release a "beta 2" set of profiles which will include support for new cameras well as fix some known issues with the existing ones. There will also be a "beta 2" of the DNG Profile Editor, which is essentially a bug fix update.
As with the beta 1 profiles, there will be an installer so you don't have to worry about where to stick the new profiles. The installer won't delete or replace the existing beta 1 profiles, nor will it overwrite any custom profiles you may have built using DNG Profile Editor. So you don't have to worry about the color rendering for existing images (which use the 'beta 1' profiles) changing their appearance behind your back.
Both are free and will be released to the public very soon. See Thomas's notes in his description of Camera Raw updates in a recent thread in the Camera Raw forum if you want a closer guess on what "soon" means.
There are more details, but I think this is enough for now. Ultimately I will attempt to update the DNG Profiles FAQ with more info, but I haven't yet figured out how to squeeze 25 hours into a day!
Eric

Camera Profiles and PS Elements

I'm a happy camper with LightRoom and the new profiles :-)
A friend of mine have just bought a Nikon D60 and PSE. He is not ready
start using a RAW convert yet but I'm sure he want to do that later. That's way I advice him to shoot RAW from the start so he can edit this picture later when he is ready.
Can he use the new camera profiles with PSE? Is it possible to choose lets say Camera Standard as a default when he open raw pictures?

Excellent Thomas. How do you select another profile then Adobe Standard in PSE?
Ramõn: Even if my friend have less option in PSE I feel it's better to start shooting raw. Then he later can buy LR or PS CS and reedit pictures taken to day.

BUG: Access Connect Abort, when I create a new network profile.

Where can I report bugs?
My system is windows xp sp2 on X60.
I have been using AC-4.42(Access Connection) for a long time. And before, there is no problem when I added new network profile into it.
But yesterday, I wanted to add a new profile into it. I opened the "create profile" window and input the name of the new profile (I have two network adapters, wired and wireless. So by default, the both are selected. And I left the default selection unchanged.), then "Next". The 2nd window is about wireless config, I configured everything, then go on "Next", at this moment, an error occured and AC aborted with four error windows. The titles of those windows are "ACMainGUI.exe error" and "ACMainGUIWnd: ACMainGUI.exe".
Then I did it again, I opened the "create profile" window, and this time, in this (1st) window, I changed the selection of network adapter, besides inputing the name of the new profile. I only selected the wired adapter, and then "Next". Sadly, this time the 2nd(next) window did not appear(pop up) at all. Instead, those four error windows poped up one by one. AC aborted again.
I repeated the above operations many times, and everytime, AC aborted.
So I went to the online "support and download" to look for some updates about AC. And I found AC-4.52 with luck. After downloading and installing, unfortunately the problem still exists. AC-4.52 still aborts when I create a new network profile.
So now, what to do. I have no ways. I am expecting the developers could note this problem and fix it and give me a newer update as soon as possible.
Sigh...

I have exactly the same issue. Next to the actions mentioned by ixbm I have also fully uninstalled and reinstalled the AC-4.52, but this didn't help.
Any idea on how to solve, installing older version?
regards,
Bart

Lightroom 2 camera profiles

I've tried to install the new camera profiles in LR2 in Windows Vista without any luck. I've followed the instructions and i've checked for the files on the recomended locations. All was right, except there were still no aditional profiles on the camera calibration tab.
The profiles were located at
C:\Program Data\Adobe\Camera Raw\Camera Profiles.
There were two folders there:
Adobe Standard beta 1
Camera beta 1
I could load the profiles in ACR, but not in LR. Weird.
After a lot of re-installing i tried to copy my camera profiles to the root folder, so i picked the specific profiles and copy them to C:\Program Data\Adobe\Camera Raw\Camera Profiles
And it worked!! LR now sees the profiles!!
Just thought i'd share this, in case someone has the same problem.
Cheers.

I'm sorry, I'm sorry, I'm sorry!! I was looking at a jpeg!! I thought it was a RAW file (Canon .CR2). I had shot a Macro and they are jpegs :-(
Now I have my profiles and the moment I changed it to my camera's profile, WOW, I finally have LR show me my files like I wanted!
Now, I STILL don't see the tiny camera with the icons at the top withthe other tools, like I saw in the Adobe page under Getting Started:
http://labs.adobe.com/wiki/index.php/DNG_Profiles
I really appreciate all of your help and apologize for overlooking this.
Gloria

Camera Profile Beta - will it port?

First, thank you very much to Adobe for creating these new camera profiles per:
http://labs.adobe.com/wiki/index.php/DNG_Profiles#Camera_Profiles_and_DNG_Profile_Editor
For the Fuji S5 and Nikon D80 this makes a major difference.
So, here's the question - if I set my pictures to "Adobe Standard beta 2" profile and in a couple months you go out of "beta" and the profile becomes "Adobe Standard", are the pictures I assigned "Adobe Standard beta 2" going to lose their profile or get messed up.
I assume when this becomes production I will remove and reinstall the production version and/or the production one will replace the beta profiles. In which case will the "fixed" naming of profiles cause me problems?
If the answer is yes, will there be a way to find and replace the broken profiles at some future date with the correct production one (I have a very large catalog)???
Thanks in advance!

In article <[email protected]>,
[email protected] wrote:
>
I actually read that before going ahead and deleting the beta 1 profiles.
"Camera Raw 4.6, 5.1 and Lightroom 2.1 will automatically switch to
using the beta 2 profiles instead."
This statement seems rather clear, but when I checked afterwards the
profile selection was empty on *all images* that had the beta 1 profile
assigned before.
What does that mean? Did the automatic switch not work or is this just a
cosmetic glitch?
Cheers Martin

Pscs 4 adding new camera profiles

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for