PSD files canvas size changes?

Hi all,
Working in FCP (6.0.4) and noticing the importing of certain PSD files don't maintain their original canvas size. I need PSDs in order to have a transparent background but don't understand why this happens. Older versions seemed to handle this but for some reason it's doing this and not sure if it's playing up.
thanks guys
Chuck

Your PSD graphics need to be contained in a file that has the same dimensions as your video.
If your graphics came from another source, such as a print ad, they will most likely not be the same as your video.
Make a blank Photoshop document. Either from the presets for video available in PS or one of your own. The presets are available by going to File > New and choosing from the Preset selection button.
You can set options for transparent background etc, here too.
Copy the content of the original graphics file and paste it into the new PSD that you just created.
Use the Transform controls to adjust size and position as required.
Aspect ratio controls are in the "Image" menu bar item of Photoshop, should you need them.

Similar Messages

  • .psd file reducing size when sending file to web guy who is using PC (1020x750 changing to 640x471)

    I have created a layered .psd file for a client of mine for his website who is dealing with a web guy in India to programme it. The guy in India is using a PC.
    The file when I send it out is sized 1020pixels x 750pixels, at 72dpi. When the web guy opens it at the other end he is saying it is 640pixels x 471pixels.
    Has anyone experience this before? Is there something I am setting up wrong within my .psd file?

    You might be using Snow Leopard 10.6 and you  might have sent the message without noticing the option in the lower right of your message window.
    http://forums.adobe.com/servlet/JiveServlet/downloadImage/2-2516338-18245/355-193/Screen+s hot+2010-01-13+at+5.32.18+PM.png

  • Resizing PSD Print/Canvas Size without re-doing entire graphic?

    Hello All,
    Bit of a dillema here...I modified an old magazine ad my company had made in PS, and then exported to PDF for the magazie publisher....I was under the impression that the modified one was the right spec for the publisher, but it turns out the one I modified is far too big for print (my modified version is 8x10, and probably needs to be a 1/4 of that)
    So, I was wondering how I could export the ad/layers/etc onto the correct smaller canas/print size without re-doing the entire ad. I know it can be done using drag and drop onto the correct print size as I have seen somebody do this, but I forget the steps involved. Thanks for any help - I'm a bit more of a coder/IT Tech than graphics guru but have been tasked with this stuff as of late!
    LC317 

    thanks for the reply - I tried  and it didn't work...I made the changes per your post, and it didn't change the dimensions of the ad.
    As well, dragging and dropping 1 psd onto another PSD isn't woirking either (the layers do not transfer over, just 1 layer, even though I have all layers selected!?)
    I know there is a way to drop the larger PSD onto the smaller PSD, then using something like SHIFT + Mouse to adjust the size without distorting, but I am missing a command somewhere (I have seen somebody do this several months back)
    There must be some simple way to do this without recreating the entire advirtisement! Thanks for any help!

  • How to reduce size of RAW & PSD files after all adjustments are finished?

    I thought I read something about an Aperture feature that reduces file size of RAW files to something like a large .jpg file. I have finished adjusting many RAW files and could better use the disc space for other things. Is there any such feature or procedure? I have not upgraded to Aperture 2.0 but will soon.
    Also, after making the round-trip to PhotoShop Elements, I see a large PSD file. Can I shrink that file after all adjustments are made?

    If you're using referenced files in Aperture, you can archive the raw files onto a CD or some other place and delete the original. Just make sure Aperture is set to generate previews before you do this. That way you can see the file even after it's gone. You can't export or make any adjustments unless you can re-link the raw file.
    And as far as PSD files, you should change your preferences to use TIFF for external editors. Then at least you can save the file in Photoshop as a compressed TIFF, which can save quite a bit of room. Also, I've noticed that Aperture uses 16-bit TIFF files, so you can save even more room by converting the file to an 8-bit TIFF.
    By the way, take note that while Aperture defaults to ".tiff" as it's file suffix for TIFF files, Photoshop prefers ".tif". This can cause confusion. You've been warned.

  • Smart Objects...changing canvas size problem

    When changing the canvas size of a smart object, the layer on the original document will distort visually since it doesn't update the size of the smart object.
    Is there a solution to this, or an easy way to quickly update every instance of the smart object on the original doc?
    To clarify: I know that you can change the dimensions of the smart object on the original doc and it'll fix it, my question is if there's a way to automatically have that happen and have the original doc smart objects respect your canvas size changes on the smart object doc.
    Reproduce:
    1) Draw a circle
    2) Turn it into a smart object
    3) Go into the smart object, change the canvas size by increasing the height of the canvas. The smart object should now have a circle with blank space above/below it.
    4) Save the smart object
    5) The circle on the original document will now be squished.
    I'm using Photoshop CS5

    xg3 wrote:
    When changing the canvas size of a smart object, the layer on the original document will distort visually since it doesn't update the size of the smart object.
    When you change the canvas size of a document the only layer that will change is a backgroung layer for it does not support transparency so its pixels will be changed.  However a background layer should not distort it may be cropped  and have canvas added in which case the color of the empty canvas can be set in the canvas size dialog.  All other layer including Smart Object layer should not chang at all.  Layer positioning in relationship to the canvas  and the new canvas size is set during the canvas size change.  Layers can be any size and have any aspect ratio. Their sizes can be smaller, the same or larger then the canvas size. Even layer that can fit  within a documents canvas size may be positioned so that all, some or none of the layer is over the documents canvas.
    I do not know what you mean when you write the original document chages. A smart object layer has an embedded copy of an object. The original document is not touched. You can open the smart object layer embedded object in  Photoshop by double clicking on the smart object icon in the layers palette smart object layer and change it size. And distort it f you wish. When you use Photoshop save. Photoshop will change the enbedded object in the smart object layer. You can also leave the embedded smaro object as is and change the smart object layer size and distort it using transform on the smart object layer itsself.
    I think what you did was to open the smart object in photoshop change its canvas saze then save it. The updated smart object is realy round but you dont see that it is becaue it is being transformec ti fit the original documents canvas. If you do a Canvas size on the codument you will see the original docyment canvas size is not change and thet your now squaching a now changed taller object into a shorter canvas.  With each Smart Obkect layer there is as associated transform.
    No I was wrong I just tried that and it looks like the transform was not the problem as yo can see I dir a Ctrl+T so you can see the size of the smart object layer is now biger then the original document and is positioned centered canvas is still 300x300 white area in image

  • Imported Photoshop Layers change in Motion after re-saving PSD file

    Curious if anyone has seen this issue:
    I have a multi-layered Photoshop CS drawing that I import (All Layers) into Motion to animate. No problem.
    If I make a change to the original Photoshop PSD file, the Motion layers are updated incorrectly. The layers are swapped and their locations move. The only fix I have is to completely re-import the file and start from scratch.
    I've also seen the Motion layers change slightly if I just save the PSD file again without changes. They are minor, but still apparent.
    Anyone, anyone?
    Dual 2GHz G5 : 3GB RAM   Mac OS X (10.4.5)   FCP5

    Lesson learned. Do you know, is the a problem only if PS and Motion are open at the same time?
    I like the fact that Motion attempts to update, but the fact it does it wrong is a bummer. I suppose if this only happens when the two programs are open one could simply close motion, change one or two layers in photoshop, and import only those layer into Motion upon re-opening. Not a big deal.
    I may try and see what happens... with a small project without a deadline...

  • Imported a .psd file into project - why showing up as a sequence?

    hi everyone
    i successfully imported a photoshop file into a project recently, after help from you, and it ended up working fine. I adjusted the size and placement in the viewer and got what i wanted.
    i have tried to do it again, with a different photoshop file, however this time when i import it into the browser it appears with a sequence icon, rather than clip icon. so when i double click to open it up and adjust - it opens a new dedicated timeline rather than in the viewer - i THOUGHT i'd done everything the same - but i guess not.
    what did i do different?
    thanks
    hugh

    Its a feature! Not a bug. By importing a .psd file you can play with the layers in FCP. Apply motion features to a layer, fade the layers on and off at different times, or just change the opacity to suit your background. I know several people that create all their lower thirds for a show in one .psd file and then change the info by turning on and off the different layers. The advantage is you can easily maintain control and placement of your graphics. Like the previous responder I personally don't like .psd's in my timeline. I prefer .pict. Probably because when I started editing it was the only choice on a Mac and it allows for an alpha channel. Using alpha or matte channels make the best keys.
    Bill

  • Psd files not updating edited smart objects (PS CC as of 6/3/14)

    I created a master PSD file and added four different TIF files as 'linked' (not embedded) Smart Objects.  If I edit these linked files (they open when double-clicked, or 'Edit Contents') make changes and then save & close the edited master TIF files, the main PSD file does not reflect the edited changes. If I double click the Smart Object, it opens and shows my edits, but to save & close still does not update the master PSD file.   I do this all the time without issue, so I am perplexed.  Even if I right-click the smart object and select "Update All Modified Content" nothing changes.  Closing the file, restarting Photoshop- nothing updates the main PSD file with the changes to the edited TIF files... EXCEPT if I 'replace contents' with the same file: then it updates the PSD.
    Any ideas?

    I was actually just working in Illlustrator. Selecting the vector object and then select PS and Paste. I'm then asked if I want this to be a smart object. I select yes and it adds the object as a smart object layer. If I double click the layer it opens it in Illustrator, I make a change, save it and close it. Then back to PS and the smart object doesn't update.
    I haven't used Place Embedded or Place Linked. I don't understand what those functions do. It's just not how I'm use to working.
    Actually I have a large PSD doc. Inside it is a group of objects that I have turned into a Smart object. Inside that (by double clicking) is an AI file that is also a smart object. When I open that up to make a change it won't update once I save and close.
    I have tried a coulpe of test with placed Linked and Embedded objects and I can't get those to work either. So what ever the change was. So far not really liking it.

  • Double-click On PSD File And Timeline Disappears!?

    Have dropped a .psd file on track V2 and want to resize it in Motion window.
    So double-click it but timeline seems to vanish and a "negative" clip or something appears in the middle left of where timeline should be.
    How do I make .psd behave like a normal clip and prevent the timeline from vanishing?
    Incidentally the .psd has a coloured shape with a transparent background.
    Message was edited by: Ian R. Brown

    Hi Ian,
    The PSD opens in its own sequence in the timeline to let you change the values of the various layers that it might be composed of. If you make a PNG, it will not save the layers or let you edit their values in FCE.
    If you want to change the motion values of the whole PSD file and not change them individually for the separate layers, select the PSD in your original timeline and click Enter to open it in the viewer.

  • Lightroom 1.3 "Sidecar file has conflict" on .PSD files...

    I've got some .psd files that I changed in Lightroom - they're layered photoshop files, saved with maximize compatibility. The change is to keywords on these files. At present I have about a dozen (that I know of) that appear NOT to be able to update their metadata. The error that displays when I put the mouse on the image's metadata icon is "Sidecar file has conflict".....
    Mayhap I'm missing something, but there are no sidecar files that I know of. They're PHOTOSHOP files, not RAW. The only change to these files in Lightroom was to add, delete, or alter one or more keywords. Other files write metadata successfully, but these fail. How do I get LR to fix this?

    Don, not that I'm doubting your statement, and in truth I can't recall whether or not there were jpegs with the same name, but if having a jpeg with the same filename causes this kind of problem, isn't that pretty much the definition of a BUG? Again, this seems a pretty major problem, although I suppose if it only happens occasionally and the people affected don't mind losing their changes, its no big deal...

  • Batch Process Change Canvas Size Buggy

    I have 300+ products shots that need to go up to our website.
    Using FW CS3 I was able to resize and optimize both full size
    images and the thumbnails. The issue is due to our website setup
    the thumbnails are expected to be exactly 100x100. If the canvas
    size is irregular the image gets stretched or squeezed when served
    up on the site.
    So I created a custom action to set the canvas size to 100 x
    100 with a white background and to expand from the center out. When
    I run this manually everything is ducky. But when I add it to my
    batch process the actual content of the thumbnails moves from image
    to image. Some items are centered fine, some are too far left or
    too far right (or high,low) some are shifted so much that they are
    actually cut off to the left or right. There seems to be no rhyme
    or reason to it.
    Here is how the batch is set up:
    It grabs the original file ( a press resolution PSD file) and
    fit to size to 100 x 100. Then I run the command to set canvas size
    to 100x100 white background. And then it exports it to optimized
    jpeg. I have tried running the actions separately. And when I just
    run the fit to size and optimization as a batch the thumbs look
    fine no weird positioning. So I know it is the command.
    Any ideas?

    Thankyou Heath
    If I choose scale > scale to fit area > then choose a maximum width or height, that works for that part of the process.
    Percentage doesn’t work, because I need them to be a particular size (either width or height, doesn’t matter , as long as nither of them exceeds 00px)
    For the part that I then want to find the smallest measurement (width or height) and make a particular size, there doesn’t seem to be any way that I can find in FW to do that.
    But, after searching on line, I found an app that does all that and more, its brilliant.  It will find the largest side, the smallest side, or whatever and change it to what you want and rescale the other side to fit.
    This is the link - http://www.rw-designer.com/picture-resize
    Fiona

  • Is there a way to prevent LR from reducing size (pixels) of files transfered to Photoshop as a psd file for editing?

    The subject line says it all.  I have discovered that LR reduces the size of files transferred to Photoshop for further editing when compared to the same RAW file processed in ACR in Photoshop.  For example, a psd file created by LR from a 36 MB RAW file will typically result in a 100 MB psd file.  The same RAW file processed similarly in Photoshop will result in a file around 300 MB.  This makes a huge difference when the files are converted to JPEGs for printing.  The smaller LR psd files result in JPEGs typically under 500 KB where the Photoshop JPEGs are typically around 1.5 MB.   

    Whew!  I didn't think this would turn into such a long discussion!.     OK - my error,  spatial data not color.  But that is loosing focus on my question.  My objective is to get the best print possible from the final JPEG file used for printing..  As previously noted, for a given RAW file w/similar adjustments but with one processed in LR and the other in PS , a print made from the larger of two resulting JPEG files, the larger JPEG file resulting from only  PS ACR processing (i.e., no LR) will result in a better print.  Elie-d appears to have answered my basic question. If LR will always pass a 103 MB file then I assume there is no way to change this size.  In case anyone is interested here is some additional info for consideration.  Both LR & PS using 8 bit mode and 240 ppi..  Procedure in LR: 1) download RAW files from camera CD; 2) make adjustments to photo;  3) using Edit in External Processor, photo transferred to PS in PSD format, 8 bit. 4) file size around 100 MB (103 MB per elie-d).  Procedure in PS:  1) download RAW file to hard drive with Nikon View2; 2) open file in PS - auto opens in ACR; 3) apply essentially the same adjustments (e.g., exposure, highlight, shadow, etc) ) as applied in LR;  4) file opened in PS editor;  5) resulting PSD file size with no further processing (i.e., no layers, etc.) is 310 MB).  The resulting JPEG file created from the LR PSD is typically less than 200 KB whereas the JPEG from the PS PSD will generally be around 1.5 MB.   As an academic question it would still be interesting to know why one gets different size PSD files from LR and PS and what, if any, affect this has on print quality.  As for now I will not use LR to process RAW files.  I prefer the larger PSD & JPEG files I get using just PS            

  • PSD files sent over FTP given 1kb file size, archived, and have .bin appended to extension

    I'm trying to deliver PSD files to someone over our server's FTP. If the FTP shared folder is accessed via a browser (like safari which is the main thing I've been testing on), the files in are listed as being only 1kb in size when each is approximately 60MB and all have had .bin appended to the .psd file extension. When the file is downloaded it's still 1kb and when opened it is associated with the archive utility which attempts to unarchive it and produces and identically named and extensioned file of 4kb size which cannot be opened by preview or text edit or photoshop.
    Changing the extension does not help as suggested here http://forums.appleinsider.com/archive/index.php/t-25119.html . Also if the file is downloaded via 3rd party FTP software like cyber duck, though the file size is listed as 1kb, the correct size file is downloaded though still has the .bin extension. When this full sized .bin file is opened, archive utility instead of unarchiving attempts to archive it and produces a file roughly half the size which too cannot be opened. Speaking with apple care resulted in the suggestion that I use terminal command line to force the client to use binary mode when downloading the file which also downloads a file of correct size but with the .bin extension and that can not be opened.
    Is this a known issue with PSD files? I've not come accross this before, the server is configured correctly and different file types are successfully downloading with no changes to size or extension and then opening as they should upon receipt at the client side.

    Hi and thanks,
    that was my next port of call but I stumbled across a more permanent fix. Mac OSX server automatically converts files sent over FTP to something called MacBinary on the fly and it seems this process doesn't agree with PSD files. Someone else encountered this problem back in 2003 and found this solution
    http://forums.appleinsider.com/archive/index.php/t-25119.html
    speaking to apple care they also sent a link for the official mac instructions for achieving the same thing here
    http://support.apple.com/kb/TA20996
    and here
    http://support.apple.com/kb/TA20645?viewlocale=en_US
    in the second explanation it's important to note for anyone attempting to follow this that if you're fixing the problem on MacOsX server rather than just MacOSX it isn't necessary to enable the root account as it is automatically enabled by default. Simply log out and log back in as root and use the same password as the first administrator account you set up when the server was first configured.

  • Cropping + Changing Canvas Size

    Hello,
    I have a problem (because I'm a beginner in Photoshop), and it's that when I crop and image and try to change the canvas size - I change the size because I'm using another type of paper - (and anchor the image to the top left), the image looks like the way it was before the crop. Is there another way to do this? Am I doing it wrong?
    Thanks

    Ok, so, what I did:
    New File 4x6 (in Custom)
    Drag & Drop the picture to Photoshop (making a new layer in top of layer 0 or background)
    Select the crop tool and arrange the picture like you want it to be seen after cropping it
    After I have the picture cropped, I want to print it in a 4x6 paper, but when I click File>Print, the paper says 8.5x11 (which is the standard format)
    Because I want it to be printed in 4x6 paper (so it can be correctly printed) I go to Image>Canvas Size and set the width and height of the canvas (in this case 4x6)
    When I do this, the canvas becomes large again, but the picture looks like the way it was before the crop.
    My question is if I'm doing this wrong, or if there's another way. Hope you understand. I added the pictures in order, just in case.

  • .psd file size does not make any sense to me

    I am hoping someone can explain the huge .psd file sizes I am seeing.
    I have a Canon 7D and shoot raw.  I have a raw file that is 24.6 Mbytes and is a 3456 x 5184 pixel image. I then open with ACR and do nothing but save it as a 16-bit .psd file with the same image (pixel) resolution.  The .psd file is 102.5 Mbytes.
    By my calcs a 3456 x 5184 x 2 bytes (16 bit depth) is 35.8 Mbytes uncompressed.  Yet the .psd is nearly 3 times this size before it is ever opened in Photoshop.
    Can anyone explain why?  My 256 GByte disk has been eaten up like a bunch of breath mints...

    Your assumptions are wrong.
    "16 bit" RGB data has 3 colors per pixel x 16 bits per color.  Thus, 3456 x 5184 x 6 bytes = 107 megabytes and change.
    The raw file has, as I recall, 14 bits per photosite of measurement data that has not been debayered.  Only one color range of light is measured per photosite.
    Both the Canon CR2 raw format and the Photoshop PSD format include lossless compression as well.
    I hope this helps clear things up.
    -Noel

Maybe you are looking for