PSU update patch link

Hi,
While applying psu 11.1.0.7.2 on 11.1.0.7.1 i got this,
Following patches have conflicts. Please contact Oracle Support and get the merged patch of the patches :
8199107, 8833297, 7639602, 7111245, 7295298, 6972189
Do i raise SR requesting these patches. Or is there any direct link to get the merged patch of these.
Thanks,
Taher

Hi Taher
I just discovered another Metalink note which indicates that some patch conflicts can be ignored;
"Patch Set Updates - One-off Patch Conflict Resolution [ID 1061295.1]"
If this all gets too confusing then the best is to log an SR with a list of conflicts and let Oracle advise you further.
Regarding your new questions.
Q1). How can i confirm, i have 11.1.0.7.1. if i check the opatch lsinventory for 11.1.0.7.1 patch, it is showing in the list.
A1) It seems like this is a known problem. There is a discussion of this problem here;
http://jhdba.wordpress.com/2010/01/27/identifying-applied-psu-patches/#more-520
Apparently you can use this command (but not with 100% success);
SELECT * FROM registry$history;
You can also have a look at this note "How to confirm that a Critical Patch Update (CPU) has been installed in Linux / UNIX [ID 821263.1]".
This note says "To implement the CPU installation into each database associated to the ORACLE_HOME, the Post Installation steps must be executed as documented in the CPU README". So extra steps are required during the application of the CPU to update the registry$history.
Q2). In the document
Preparation Guidelines for an E-Business Suite Release 12.1.1 Upgrade [ID 761570.1]
Path E -> Section B, i have applied all the patches upto 8199107. All the patches afer this are for 11.1.0.7.0
But as i am in 11.1.0.7.1, can i still apply the remaining patches which are
8639653
8940108
9026927
9066130
9554727
9743057
A2). To be honest I am not sure what the answer to this question is. Maybe one of the other experts can answer this question.
Does opatch indicate if these patches are currently missing?
I would check with Oracle about this.
Regards
Frank

Similar Messages

How to update Solaris Link Editors: (ld) in Solaris 10

Hi,
How do I update Solaris Link Editors: from 5.10-1.500 to 5.10-1.1505 ?
This is wat I get:
bash-3.00# /usr/ccs/bin/ld -V
ld: Software Generation Utilities - Solaris Link Editors: 5.10-1.490
gcc version is 3.4.3
bash-3.00# /usr/sfw/bin/gcc -v
Reading specs from /usr/sfw/lib/gcc/i386-pc-solaris2.10/3.4.3/specs
Configured with: /builds/sfw10-gate/usr/src/cmd/gcc/gcc-3.4.3/configure prefix=/usr/sfw with-as=/usr/sfw/bin/gas with-gnu-as with-ld=/usr/ccs/bin/ld without-gnu-ld enable-languages=c,c++ --enable-shared
Thread model: posix
gcc version 3.4.3

Try and check if there is any patch which contains /usr/ccs/bin/ld, that should do the trick..
.7/M.

Install offline update patches on SCCM 2012

Dear every one,
Could you help me how to install offline update patches for windows on SCCM 2012?
Please show me some materials or any link to learn it
I'm on my way to research and deploy it
Thanks show much!!!

Dear Arnavsharma,
Yes, I mean to talk about MS updates.
I have read your topic that you show, but my situation is difference
the first purpose, I built SCCM 2012 to update Definitions for System center Endpoint Protection 2012 through Software update Point. It 's still working normally
And now, I need to do more tasks with SCCM 2012. I need to deploy some specify offline MS update which locate in Server through SCCM.
Because, this MS updates has been built reserved for my Company, so it's not available on Micsoft
Could you help me ?

Flash MX/6 update/patch

Hello. Yes this is a question about an old obsolete version, but does anyone know where I can get the update/patch that upgrades Flash MX 6.0 to 6.0 r25 ? Would have expected to find this on Adobe's site somewhere - on an archive probably - can't locate it though. Update downloads only seem to go back to Flash 7. Any ideas ?
thanks
G.
PS I have a fully licensed version of Flash MX but had to reinstall it due to a machine failure and I no longer have the patch.

http://cgi.ebay.com/Macromedia-Flash-6-0-MX-FULL-Version_W0QQitemZ270013331111QQihZ017QQca tegoryZ182QQrdZ1QQcmdZViewItem
http://cgi.ebay.com/Macromedia-Flash-6-0-MX-FULL-Version_W0QQitemZ270013331219QQihZ017QQca tegoryZ182QQrdZ1QQcmdZViewItem
http://cgi.ebay.com/Macromedia-Flash-6-0-MX-FULL-Version_W0QQitemZ270013331346QQihZ017QQca tegoryZ182QQrdZ1QQcmdZViewItem
http://cgi.ebay.com/Macromedia-Flash-6-0-MX-FULL-Version_W0QQitemZ270013331449QQihZ017QQca tegoryZ182QQrdZ1QQcmdZViewItem
"GG" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:eai19g$nn2$[email protected]..
> Since 6.0 is so old.
> ebay.com
>
> "Aleque" <[email protected]> wrote in
message
> news:eai0jj$n15$[email protected]..
>> Hello
>>
>> My boss told me to investigate about Flash, and how
much it costs but I
>> can't
>> find any info about good old Flash MX 6.0 (only
about Flash 8) - how much
>> does
>> Flash MX 6.0 cost and from where can we purchase it?
Please be kind and
>> post a
>> direct link.
>>
>> Best Regards
>>
>
>

Any Product update patches/ Bug fix reqired after R1213 up-grade ?

Hi
i have completed R1211 - R1213 Up-gradation. I have followed the Document Oracle E-Business Suite Release 12.1.3 Readme (Doc ID 1080973.1).
Is there any additional product update patches need to apply for any specific modules after up-gradation of R1213?. How to proceed this activity? if needs to update with latest product bug fix/patch. Below are the modules we are using Please help us in this.
gl
ap
ar
fa
ce
JA
po
inv
ONT
WIP
BOM
CST
MRP
OAM
XDO
Thanks
DBA

Please refer to the following links/docs:
Oracle Applications Current Patchset Comparison Utility - patchsets.sh [ID 139684.1]
EBS: R12.1 Oracle Financials Recommended Patch Collection (RPC) [ID 954704.1]
Identifying Recommended Patches for E-Business Suite Environments
https://blogs.oracle.com/stevenChan/entry/recommended_patches_for_oracle_e
Identifying the Latest Family Packs for Oracle E-Business Suite
https://blogs.oracle.com/stevenChan/entry/latest_available_packs_for_oracle
Thanks,
Hussein

Fresh install and update patch problems 119060-17 , 122213-10 , 122912-02

Just yesterday, i installed a fresh Solaris 10 x86 onto some pc hardware. After getting solaris installed and issues with my network card, i downloaded and installed the free version of the update manager 1.0.x. Next, i proceeded to update all the general patches for the solaris 10 system. I started with the command 'pprosvc -i' from a terminal. It then proceeded to download and validate a bunch of patches successfully until it hit the following 3 patches:
119060-17 ---- X11 6.6.2_x86: Xsun patch
122213-10 ---- GNOME 2.6.0_x86: GNOME Desktop Patch
122912-02 ---- SunOS 5.10_x86: Apache 1.3 Patch
All 3 failed some kind of validation and then crashed the pprosvc program, at which point it exited with the following error:
122912-02 cannot be validated
119060-17 cannot be validated
122912-02 cannot be validated
Unexpected Failure: java.lang.Throwable: ERROR: Failed to validate the digital signature(s).
I also tried to use the GUI Update Manager to update, hoping the problem was isolated to pprosvc, but that problem was also in the GUI with a similar error message:
Error occurred...The detailed error message is: Unexpected Failure: java.lang.Throwable: ERROR: Failed to validate the digitial signature(s)
Anyone know why Sun's update patch process is so troublesome?
Getting Tired of Solaris Updates...
I should mention that this is the free solaris 10 x86 install and i don't have a service contract with Sun. If this problem persists, i don't think i'll get one, as i see only further problems after buying one.
tired and confused

Hi,
There is an issue with this that is currently being investigated. There is another thread that may shed some light on what is happening here;
http://forum.sun.com/jive/forum.jspa?forumID=316
Thread title is : Sun UC, Digitally Signed Patches Using New Verisign Certificates
In the short-term please ensure that the patch mentioned in it is installed.
To quote part of mentioned thread above:
"Once the Sun Update Connection client software is upgraded with patch 121118-06 (SPARC) or 121119-06 (x86/x64) or later revisions normal behavior will resume. "
If this fails to resolve your problem, would you be kind enough to post the output of the following command for analysis please;
# showrev -p | egrep -e '121454|121119|120336|121082|121564|122232|119789'
Sincerely,
Moderator.
Message was edited by:
ForumModerator

Win CSXS Infrastructure 3.0.2 update - download link needed

Hello,
I am restricted to manually updating Adobe Creative Suite 6.0 on my work computer and I cannot locate the Windows CSXS Infrastructure 3.0.2 update. I did locate the CSXS 3.0.2 Mac update. I tried Adobe support… The call-back service was not available, live chat directed me to phone support and I gave up after my 2-4 minute estimated wait time exceeded 45 minutes. Way to go Adobe support...
If anyone could post the Windows CSXS Infrastructure 3.0.2 update/download link, it would be greatly appreciated.
Thank you...

For future viewers facing difficulty applying the CSXS Infratstructure 4.0.2 update please see Adobe CSXS Infrastructure 4 fails to install with U44M1P7 or U44M2P7 error - http://helpx.adobe.com/creative-cloud/kb/csxs-infrastructure-fails-u44m1p7.html.

Adobe Audition CS6 (5.0.2) update patch released

Hey Audition friends!
This morning we released an update patch for Adobe Audition CS6. This update, version 5.0.2 for Mac and Windows, fixes several bugs discovered after release that could not be fixed in time for the earlier patch, and cleans up a few odds and ends to ensure Audition is fully compatible for use on Windows 8. Briefly, here are the primary bug fixes:
Metronone may skip or stutter
Windows registry entry missing backslash in path
Eucon/Avid Artist control surface touchscreen: Control of Surround Panner does not work
Bounce to New Track > Selected Track: New track is now based on channelization of source track
Windows 8: Third-party drivers do not have a valid WHQL signature
CD Burning: Removed 78 minute limit from CD Layout.
Audition may crash on Mac when exporting to OMF
Audition may crash when attempting to bounce a track with a channelization that does not match the Master track
You may install the update by selecting Help > Updates… in Adobe Audition CS6 or through the Adobe Application Manager tool. Additionally, you may download the patch installer directly for Mac and Windows.

Since 5.02 is an update, not an upgrade (there's a technical difference under the hood) then you shouldn't need to rescan for VSTs or anything - the new executable will use the same settings files. However, I would suggest NOT updating in the middle of a project as a good rule of thumb. If you choose to, I might suggest backing up the existing application files or folder so you could easily restore if you chose to. There were no major changes introduced between 5.0 and 5.02 except for some bug fixes to improve stability, so you'll probably be safe, but unless you're running into one of the specific issues described, my recommendation would be to wait.
As for your second question, I don't know the answer to that. What happens when you attempt to perform a mixdown? There was some work done for the 6.0 release that would have reduced problems when trying to mixdown with UAD and other instance-limited plugins. If you enable Track Pre-Render for those tracks, by clicking the lightning bolt icon in the Effects Rack or the "fx" view in the track panel for those tracks, do you still experience a problem?

InDesign missed to update a linked InCopy

Hello the following happened in a InDesign/InCopy-Workflow:
We have several Editors and a view Designers. Everyone is working with PC (Windows XP) InCopy CS2 and InDesign CS2. The Files (incx and indd) are stored on a centralized filestore, so no copying is done.
A Designer opened a Indesign file yesterday where several InCopyFiles are linked. This morning the editors made several changes on these InCopy Files.
This afternoon the designer again opened the InDesign-File updated the linked articles and checked an article out to make some fine tuning and checked it in again.
After that an editor regognized that his changes of this morning disappeared in the InCopy-File.
Investigations at backup (hourly snapshot) showed:
- that the InCopy had been stored with the content of the yesterday's InDesign-File.
- that the editors saved there documents in a correct way
Had anyone had such a problem before or does anyone know what the problem could be?
Normally it should be impossible, I think. Nothing the less it happend at least once. (Maybe it happened before, editors mentioned lost editings three times over the last two years, but there where no snapshot available anymore, so we thought the editor missed to save or something like that)

>Also, once InDesign crashes, it corrupts the file that was linked to the InDesign document that was being updated.
Are you absolutely sure that it's not the other way around - i.e., that the linked file gets corrupted, which then causes InDesign to crash? I ask this because we recently had a client with a similar sounding problem. At first we also thought that InDesign was corrupting the file, but eventually discovered that the file server on which the links resided had some bad RAM which was causing the PSD files to occasionally get corrupted.
Photoshop is apparently more tolerant of some corruptions than InDesign. When we'd open one of the problematic PSDs in Photoshop, we'd get a dialog box alerting us that there was corruption, but the file would open. InDesign, on the other hand, would crash VERY hard when placing or updating such a linked file.

Automatic update of links appears broken in 2007 format word documents

this is all in Word 2013 Pro + [15.0.4569.1504] under Win7 [6.1.7601].
legacy DOC (XLS) format documents.
have LINK fields with the following format:
{ LINK Excel.Sheet.8 "c:\\test\\test.xls" "Sheet19!A1:D11" /a /p }
Excel spreadsheet is in the same folder.
copying the two files to a different folder (test2) and updating the links causes the path to the spreadsheet to be updated automatically.
{ LINK Excel.Sheet.8 "c:\\test2\\test.xls" "Sheet19!A1:D11" /a /p }
saving the same files as DOCX (XLSM) format causes this updating to stop working.
{ LINK Excel.SheetBinaryMacroEnabled.12 "c:\\test\\test.xlsm" "Sheet19!A1:D11" /a /p }
using "Edit links to files" to update the links causes the range parameter to be lost
this is unacceptable for obvious reasons.
what am i misunderstanding?
how can i get this to work as it did?
mtia,
e. <;)

Alas, not possible.

Reader 9.4.6 Deployment (Update Patch Order)

Just in case anyone has issues applying this update patch (Error 1334, etc.), the correct patch order (starting from full version 9.4.0) is:
→ 9.4.2 → 9.4.5 → 9.4.6
(See http://forums.adobe.com/message/3640440 for a more detailed synopsis on applying patches and instructions on creating batch files to do so).

Download Adobe Reader and Acrobat Cleaner Tool - Adobe Labs

Applying all update\patches during 'install software update' step

Hi,
I have created software update group (around 10 updates\patches) and deploy it to 'unknown computers' collection. Ts 'Install software update' step scans through and only installs 2 updates out of 10. I have kept deploy property as 'required' while publishing
on 'unknown computers' and 'install software update' has 'All Software update' selected (other option is mandatory update'). I want to have all the 10 required update to be installed . any idea what should be the settings on 'deploy' prperty for software group
that install all the updates in the group during 'install software update' step? Any pointers will be appreciated
Regards,

Hi,
Yes , they need a reboot and reboot is happening automatically. I believe, once reboot is done, other patches should take over with installation. I don't see any information for another updates that are part of same software group. For these 2 succefully
installed updates log has below that indicates they reboot and finish.
WUHandler has log:
1. Update (Missing): Security Update for Windows 7 for x64-based Systems (KB2862330) (35dcb297-873a-45af-bb19-e8b18aedd5bb, 202) WUAHandler 2/5/2014 8:09:02 AM 2760 (0x0AC8)
2. Update (Missing): Update for Windows 7 for x64-based Systems (KB2834140) (88152097-0294-4098-b27c-d2fd479e9831, 202) WUAHandler 2/5/2014 8:09:03 AM 2760 (0x0AC8)
Update 1 (35dcb297-873a-45af-bb19-e8b18aedd5bb) finished installing (0x00000000), Reboot Required? Yes WUAHandler 2/5/2014 8:09:06 AM 2348 (0x092C)
Update 2 (88152097-0294-4098-b27c-d2fd479e9831) finished installing (0x00000000), Reboot Required? Yes WUAHandler 2/5/2014 8:09:09 AM 356 (0x0164)
Update (35dcb297-873a-45af-bb19-e8b18aedd5bb) has finished the post reboot operation. HResult: 0x00000000. WUAHandler 2/5/2014 8:10:46 AM 2152 (0x0868)
Update (88152097-0294-4098-b27c-d2fd479e9831) has finished the post reboot operation. HResult: 0x00000000. WUAHandler 2/5/2014 8:10:46 AM 2152 (0x0868)
Any pointers to figure out the status of other patches\updats that are part of same group?
Regards,

Can you please update the link for the flash player standalone installer?

Can you please update the link for the flash player standalone installer?
Link: http://fpdownload.macromedia.com/pub/flashplayer/updaters/11/flashplayer_11_plugin_debug_3 2bit.exe
Source: http://kb2.adobe.com/de/cps/191/tn_19166.html#main_ManualInstaller
Source: http://forums.adobe.com/thread/889580

Dogs Key wrote:
Source: http://kb2.adobe.com/de/cps/191/tn_19166.html#main_ManualInstaller
That is an old document (Flash Player 10.3) that shouldn't be there anymore. (The English document redirects to the link below.)
The download links for the offline installers for FP 11.2 are here http://helpx.adobe.com/flash-player/kb/installation-problems-flash-player-windows.html#Ins tall_in_a_firewall_proxy_server_environment
I have updated the download links for FP 10.3 in http://forums.adobe.com/thread/889580

Vat on purchase going wrong when we update patches

Dear experts,
we have update patches upto the latest, after update the patches, vat on purchase for all states going on account( default account assigned for transaction JP5 in OB40), instead of state wise vat gl account.
we have assigned the gl accounts for transaction JP5 in table J_1it030k_v for each business place wise(state wise).
but when we do the miro system picking default account from OB40, instead of assignment from table J_1it030k_v for the transaction JP5
please provide the solution.
useful answers duly rewarded.

For Given issue configure following steps
1. For JP5 currently you are maintaing for JP5 one dummy GL A/C without tax code reference.
2. Please click on rule key of screen and tick the Tax code which is maintained in tab accounts are determine based on .
3. Maintain dummy GL account in OB40 for transaction JP5 with all tax code maintained in table J1_IT030K_V
Regards
Pravin M
Mobile No. +91 9819461787

How to make the document dirty after updating the links?

Hi,
I am using the below code to update the link resources by providing new URI. The link resources are getting updated, but the document is not becoming dirty.
                InterfacePtr<ICommand> updateCmd(CmdUtils::CreateCommand(kLinkResourceStateUpdateCmdBoss));
                InterfacePtr<ILinkResourceStateUpdateCmdData> updateCmdData(updateCmd, UseDefaultIID());
                updateCmdData->SetResource(ref.GetUID());
                updateCmdData->SetDatabase(ref.GetDataBase());
                updateCmdData->SetNotify(true);
                updateCmdData->SetUpdateAction(ILinkResourceStateUpdateCmdData::kUpdateURI);
                updateCmdData->SetURI(newURI);
                updateCmd->SetUndoability(ICommand::kRegularUndo);
                CmdUtils::ProcessCommand(updateCmd);
How do I make the document dirty after updating the resources?
Thanks,

Thanks. It is working fine.
I called PreDirty(docPtr), before updating the links.

PSU update patch link

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for