Public Sector Budgeting Freeze Issue

Hello all,
While freeze the Budget Group, I am getting below error.
Account 03.620.0.0.0.2630104.0 has budgeting enabled but does not belong to any budget group.
Account 03.615.0.0.0.6510138.0 has budgeting enabled but does not belong to any budget group.
Account 03.615.0.0.0.2110315.0 has budgeting enabled but does not belong to any budget group.
Account 03.620.0.0.0.2620208.0 has budgeting enabled but does not belong to any budget group.
Account 03.615.0.0.0.2620138.0 has budgeting enabled but does not belong to any budget group.
Account 03.620.0.0.0.2210701.0 has budgeting enabled but does not belong to any budget group.
Account 03.620.0.0.0.2110399.0 has budgeting enabled but does not belong to any budget group.
Please help me to resolve the Issue.
Thanks and Regards,
Muthu
[email protected]

I had this problem recently because the form timed out and did not finish to open. The error while trying to open the form was similar.
To solve it, what we did is:
1. Go to Administration/Manage/User Variables
2. Uncheck the "Use Context" from the dimension that is giving you the problem. (i.e Year)
3. Save
4. Go to File/Preferences/Planning/User Variables (Now you may see the variable for the dimension "Year")
5. Assign a dimension member to the Variable (Let's say: FY14) and click OK.
6. Open the form that gave you the error. (It should open now). Close Form.
7. Go to Administration/Manage/User Variables and
8. Check back the "Use Context" in the dimension. (i.e Year)
9. Save
10. Open again the form.
Edited by: Urbano83 on Feb 23, 2012 12:11 PM

Similar Messages

Public Sector Budget Validation Error

Hello all,
While Freeze the Budget I got error for Validate Budget Group Hierarchy concurrent Program. Below I am submitting the log output.
The program failed with the following errors :
Account 03.620.0.246.0.2210101.0 has budgeting enabled but does not belong to any budget group.
Account 03.620.0.11.0.2211008.0 has budgeting enabled but does not belong to any budget group.
Account 03.620.0.4309.0.2211313.0 has budgeting enabled but does not belong to any budget group.
Account 03.620.0.122.0.2210101.0 has budgeting enabled but does not belong to any budget group.
Account 03.615.130205.246.0.2210101.0 has budgeting enabled but does not belong to any budget group.
Account 03.620.0.4309.0.2211204.0 has budgeting enabled but does not belong to any budget group.
Account 03.0.0.0.0.6510134.0 has budgeting enabled but does not belong to any budget group.
Account 03.0.0.0.0.2990109.0 has budgeting enabled but does not belong to any budget group.
Account 03.620.10302.3102.310001.1450105.0 has budgeting enabled but does not belong to any budget group.
Account 03.620.0.11.0.2211313.0 has budgeting enabled but does not belong to any budget group.
Account 03.615.130205.0.0.2210101.0 has budgeting enabled but does not belong to any budget group.
Account 03.0.0.0.0.6510135.0 has budgeting enabled but does not belong to any budget group.
Account 03.620.0.135.0.2211008.0 has budgeting enabled but does not belong to any budget group.
Account 03.620.0.135.0.2210101.0 has budgeting enabled but does not belong to any budget group.
Account 03.620.0.4309.0.2220211.0 has budgeting enabled but does not belong to any budget group.
Account 03.620.0.4309.0.2110322.0 has budgeting enabled but does not belong to any budget group.
Account 03.620.0.11.0.2210101.0 has budgeting enabled but does not belong to any budget group.
Account 03.620.0.5420.0.2210101.0 has budgeting enabled but does not belong to any budget group.
Account 03.620.0.246.0.2211008.0 has budgeting enabled but does not belong to any budget group.
Account 03.615.130205.246.431001.1450105.0 has budgeting enabled but does not belong to any budget group.
Account 03.620.0.4309.0.2210101.0 has budgeting enabled but does not belong to any budget group.
Account 03.620.0.4309.0.2211008.0 has budgeting enabled but does not belong to any budget group.
Account 03.615.0.246.0.1140703.0 has budgeting enabled but does not belong to any budget group.
Account 03.620.0.4309.0.2110329.0 has budgeting enabled but does not belong to any budget group.
Account 03.615.130205.0.0.1140703.0 has budgeting enabled but does not belong to any budget group.
Account 03.615.130205.0.0.2110319.0 has budgeting enabled but does not belong to any budget group.
Account 03.615.0.4414.0.2220211.0 has budgeting enabled but does not belong to any budget group.
Account 03.620.0.4309.0.1420401.0 has budgeting enabled but does not belong to any budget group.
Account 03.620.0.4309.0.1140502.0 has budgeting enabled but does not belong to any budget group.
Account 03.620.10302.3102.310001.1450405.0 has budgeting enabled but does not belong to any budget group.
Account 03.620.0.243.0.2210101.0 has budgeting enabled but does not belong to any budget group.
Account 03.0.0.0.0.6510136.0 has budgeting enabled but does not belong to any budget group.
Account 03.620.0.3102.0.2210101.0 has budgeting enabled but does not belong to any budget group.
Account 03.620.0.11.0.2220211.0 has budgeting enabled but does not belong to any budget group.
Account 03.0.0.0.0.9900001.0 has budgeting enabled but does not belong to any budget group.
The program failed with the following errors :
The budget group has not been frozen due to validation errors. Please check the errors by checking the Error Messages Report or the View Validations screen of the Budget Group form for the root budget group.
There are warnings detected due to account range test of "Includes" only ranges, or accounts not in any budget group of the hierarchy that are budgetary accounts in GL, or missing or invalid Organization.
These warning messages are treated as errors when you choose not to force freeze or when you choose to force freeze but errors are detected.
Please choose to force freeze the budget group if warning messages will not affect the worksheet and there are no error messages like duplicate account combination.
Please explain me what would be the issue.
Thanks and Regards,
Muthu
[email protected]

you can find the public sector budget guide from the following link
http://download.oracle.com/docs/cd/B34956_01/current/acrobat/120psbug.zip
Message was edited by:
Ramsys

Oracle enterprise planning and budgeting and public sector budgeting

What is the difference between Oracle Enterprise Planning and Budgeting and oracle public sector budgeting
early response is requested please

Have you checked these docs?
Implementing Oracle Enterprise Planning and Budgeting (R12.ZPB.A) [ID 412329.1]
Using the Excel Add In with Oracle Enterprise Planning and Budgeting (R12.ZPB.A) [ID 412327.1]
Implementing Oracle Enterprise Planning and Budgeting (R11i.ZPB.B) with Oracle General Ledger [ID 356471.1]
Oracle Enterprise Planning and Budgeting Release Notes, Release 12.1.1 [ID 811206.1]
Oracle Enterprise Planning and Budgeting Release Notes, Release 12.1.2 [ID 970886.1]
Oracle Enterprise Planning and Budgeting Release Notes for Release 12.1.3 [ID 1173834.1]
Thanks,
Hussein

Documents on PSB - Public Sector Budgeting

Dear APPSNET users,
I have more than 5 years of experience in ORACLE DESIGN and DEVELOPMENT in the legacy systems and custom software development areas.
I am doing my certification towards ORACLE 8 DBA.
Now, I am planning to take the ORACLE APPLICATIONS route. I would like to concentrate on FINANCIALS, HR-PAYROLL and PUBLIC SECTOR BUDGETING modules.
Can anyone help me in getting thru this.
I would really appreciate your help.
Bye
Meenakshi Sundaram Ganesh

You might want to consider purchasing Oracle Certified Professional Financial Applications Consultant Exam Guide from Oracle Press. I believe you can order it at www.osborne.com.
Good luck!
Roger Drolet
Oxford Global Resources, Inc.

Publi Sector HR v's Public Sector Budget

Hi All
I have a small doubt whether the ubli Sector HR and Public Sector Budgeting both are same or different, If so do we have any user guides or implementation guides for Publi Sector HR .
Please help me in this
Thanks

you can find the public sector budget guide from the following link
http://download.oracle.com/docs/cd/B34956_01/current/acrobat/120psbug.zip
Message was edited by:
Ramsys

Experience using Oracle for public sector budgetting?

I am looking to know if anyone has experience using Planning for public sector budgetting, not necessarily the PubSect app itself.
I am looking for some highlevel feedback regarding the biggest challenges in using Hyperion Planning for developing a government/state budget, where the typical cycle involves a parliament or another elected organ, etc.
I am aware of the Scottish government using one and Abu Dhabi also has it implemented but if you know others I would be delighted to hear of them.
Thanks All :) .
Agnete

We did think about using the device as a "Shared Device" but we thought this would get over complicated, as the library has requested that the users can just pick it up and use it without any hassle. Which in an ideal world would be easy but alas, it is not!
We also thought about using Single App Mode and locking it into the AirWatch Secure Browser, where we could disable things like caching and saving usernames and passwords etc!
Thanks for your reply!
Vish

TE40s for Loans and Public Sector Budgeting modules

Hi Experts,
Would be appreciated, if anyone share the TE040s for Loans and Public Sector Budgeting Modules..
Thanks and Regards,
Srini M

Hi Frank,
Thanks for your reply, could you please help me any test script or functional flow document for Public Sector budgeting.
Thanks
Rajesh

Public Sector Budgeting

Hi Team,
Could any one please help me with the test scripts and relevant documents for Public Sector budgeting for R12.
Thanks
Rajesh

Hi Frank,
Thanks for your reply, could you please help me any test script or functional flow document for Public Sector budgeting.
Thanks
Rajesh

Public Sector Budgeting - "&Context Scenario" in webform

on 11.1.2, i installed public sector budgeting, some of the forms have "&Context Scenario" as the scenario. I thought this may be a subvar but it's not created in Essbase. Also the fact that there is a space between can't make this a subvar. Does any one know what this may mean? I cannot open the form because it says the context is not fully known. Does any one know what this means?

I had this problem recently because the form timed out and did not finish to open. The error while trying to open the form was similar.
To solve it, what we did is:
1. Go to Administration/Manage/User Variables
2. Uncheck the "Use Context" from the dimension that is giving you the problem. (i.e Year)
3. Save
4. Go to File/Preferences/Planning/User Variables (Now you may see the variable for the dimension "Year")
5. Assign a dimension member to the Variable (Let's say: FY14) and click OK.
6. Open the form that gave you the error. (It should open now). Close Form.
7. Go to Administration/Manage/User Variables and
8. Check back the "Use Context" in the dimension. (i.e Year)
9. Save
10. Open again the form.
Edited by: Urbano83 on Feb 23, 2012 12:11 PM

SRM 7.0 for Public Sector integrated with FM (Budget Control System)

Hello!
I'm starting an implementation project of ERP 6.0 and SRM 7.0 for Public Sector.
It would be necesary the integration not only SRM with ERP but with FM (Fund Management), with BCS (Budget Control System) specifically.
Is it possible? has anyone experience on it?
Thks so much in advance and best regards!
Marcela.-

Hi,
Certainly... If you have FM implemented in your project, you will have to make integration with SRM.
I did it some 3 years ago and it was quite problematic (a lot of notes were created by SAP on this matter, also as initiative from our project), but since then, I assume, it should not pose specific problems.
Regards,
Eli

Public Sector: Will this have any issues during Siebel upgrade?

Hello,
We are using Siebel Public Sector application (Case Management) in our product.
Every contact who is Primary under a Contact will be associated to a Master Case. If there is no master case associated with primary contact, siebel will create a new master case. In other words, Contact to Master Case is 1:1 relationship.
We are in the process of developing a new requirement where in a Contact can be linked to one or more Master Cases (1:M). Since this is deviates Siebel OOB feature we do not want to change it.
Instead, we have created a new custom stand-alone Table (which mimics OOB Master Case columns) and a "New Custom BC".
Created a link betwen Contact BC and New Custom BC (Id -> Par Row Id).
In "New Custom BC", field called "Master Case Number" has a dynamic picklist based on OOB "PUB Master Case" BC.
For other field we have mapped using pickmaps.
Our requirement is met but our only question is "Will this have any issues during Siebel upgrade?"
Quick responses will be very helpful.

Thank you for your reply. I only see three versions of Adobe Reader available for Windows XP SP3 at the Adobe site
http://get.adobe.com/reader/otherversions
In doing some research, it seems there were some issues if you skipped an update but I did not find any information (only other queries) as to my original question of compatibility. Also, how can we access the older file if it won't open in 10.1.2?
Can I load 10.1.2 in addition to their older version to check and see what will or will not open correctly before I uninstall the older version? I don't want to load the new version and then have them not be able to access a needed file...

Budget Control System IS Public Sector

Hi All,
I have newly started my work in IS Public Sector. I have to enhance the menu to print a smartform of T-code GM_DISPLAY_BUDGET/GM_CREATE_BUDGET.Could you share step by step information?
Thanks and regards
Sayantan
Moderator: Please, don't ask step-by-step info. Search, before posting. Enhancing the menu has nothing to do with Public Sector forum

Hi
Please find the below link.hope you will get the answer for your question.
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_erp2005/helpdata/en/a6/17f53b9f150248e10000000a11402f/content.htm
Cya

Settlements in project System for public sector.

We are having a unique requirements for Project system.
A Capital project will be mostly funded by Federal agency. However the capital project will end as an asset. eg, Roads, bridges etc.
1. We want to acumulate all expenses and settle it to AUC ( IM ) and later settle as an asset. ( currently possible )
2. However, based on the billings done to Fed agencies, the revenue is also to be identified in the project. ( should not be condisered for settlement, as it will reduce the Asset value ).
We tried to seggregate the cost and revenues by source structures namely 10 and 20 for Cost and revenues respectively. In the settlement rule we move the cost up from WBS element to Project level. From project we move to AUC and finally to AMR.
Our requirement is to just settle the expenses to AMR and leave the Revenues in the the project itself. However the gives a hard error that the revenue settlement should also be settled. The other option we thought about, was to settle to a cost center, but it is not advisable as the revenue will put back the budget of that cost center/fund center.
So my questions is .
1. Can part settlement happen ? ( Meaning move only costs ) ?
2. In private sector, it is possible because expenses are Cost element 1 and Revenues are 11 ( not selected for settlement except PA settlement ). However in public sector expenses and revenues are treated as Cost element 1. so how to circumvent this issue ?
Any help or direction will be much appreciated..
regards,
Venkat Kota.

I am already using the source structure to split the cost and revenues. I am also using the same settlement profile for all the requirements.
1. lower WBS to Higher WBS.
2. Higher WBS to AUC
3. AUC to AMR.
So i am not sure how i can maintain 2 settlement profiles for one project ?

Http 404 error while opening Siebel Public Sector Web Client

Hello Experts
I recently migrated to siebel web client and tools 8.2.2 from 8.2. However the issue that i have been facing now is that when i open my client i get HTTP 404 Not Found- The Web Page cannot be found.
Things that i have done to configure:
1. Enabled ActiveX settings-Settings as given in http://www.siebeloracle.com/accessing-oracle-siebel-8-1-using-windows-7-ie8-works-on-32-bit-os/
2. EnableFQDN: FALSE, FQDN: Commented.
3. My ODBC and public sector cfg have been configured as per need.
Strangely what i have encountered is that: sometimes of 1 out 30 trials, when my client opens up [P(opening client)->0 i.e. Probability is close to 0] the port number is 8081 whereas in other instances it is 8080 which i guess is by default.
URL: http://localhost:8080/start.swe
I have tried reinstalling the client but still i face the same issue.
Kindly help me out with this issue.
Regards
KT

Hi,
I see that its not a problem with the installation but some problem with the port 8080. I feel some other application is running by default on that port. So, everytime whenever I have to launch Siebel Web client, I have to launch 2 instances. (8080 and 8081). So, the instance which launches on port 8081 + works fine.
I see this process to be time consuming as I have to wait for 2 instances to open up. Hence, is there any way to define the default launch of the port when the client opens up?
Thanks and Regards
KT
Edited by: 1005486 on May 13, 2013 12:01 AM

Creation of Public Sector Planning application fails for LDAP user

The environment is on Windows 2008 R2 & EPM 11.1.2.2.302 of Planning. The creation of "general" planning applications works fine, regardless of the method of creation, Native User/LDAP User or Classic/EPMA. The creation of Public Sector Planning application using Classic Administration fails when using an LDAP user.
It works when using a Native User. It also works fine if EPMA is used, for both Native as well as LDAP users.
Our developers are not comfortable with EPMA yet, so want/need the ability to create the applications using Classic Administration.
Looking at the Planning sysout log, the only error message indicates a timeout with Calculation Manager:
Calc manager rules initialization failed. Please load and deploy the rules from Calc Manager UI
ERROR:Error while loading rules in Calc Manager. <HTML><HEAD><TITLE>Weblogic Bridge Message</TITLE></HEAD> <BODY><H2>Failure of server APACHE bridge:</H2><P><hr>No backend server available for connection: timed out after 10 seconds or idempotent set to OFF or method not idempotent.<hr> </BODY></HTML>
Calculation Manager itself seems to be working fine.
Any suggestions/thoughts anyone?
Thanks,
Andy

Hi Vivek,
The LDAP port is open to all the servers in the environment. LDAP users have no issues logging in to any of the tools that they have access to.
I think it has something to do with how Classic Planning passes the security token to Calculation Manager for an LDAP user. For a "general" Planning app, there is no evidence of such a transfer, because the Rules are created after the app has been created. And there the user logs in directly to Calculation Manager to create the rules.
When using EPM Architect, it would lead to reason that such a token is also passed, however, that mechanism does not seem to have any trouble.
This is the first time I am using a pre-packaged application like PSB, and have so far worked with only with "general" Planning apps. Wanted to see if anyone else has created PSB apps using external users successfully, so I can trade environment notes and may be come to a cause/solution.
Thanks,
Andy

Public Sector Budgeting Freeze Issue

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for