Published page looks different than iweb page

Hello everyone,
I have a problem with one of the pages on my site. I placed shaded shapes behind text and although everything looks aligned in the iweb program, when I publish it one of the pages(adults) shows the text very misaligned.
What is bugging me is that it only happens on that page, no where else.
I have cleared the cache, re-made the page, as well as other options but cannot figure out why this is happening.Maybe someone here can help me out.
My site is www.beaupitsmma.com
Thank you,
Rich

Rich:
Welcome to the Apple Discussions. Try adding the text to the shape itself. Ddouble click on the shape and start typing. You can then set the color and other font attributes. and removing it from the main text box, just leaving space so the shape will fit in. That probably is the quickest and easiest way to straighten out the issue.
You can also inset the shape into the text box at the location of the cursor by using the Insert->Shape menu option. Once the shape is inserted you can set its properties and add the text. It will then move with the text if you do any editing.
Message was edited by: Old Toad

Similar Messages

Colors in FCP looks different than when playing in QT7

The colors of the video's in FCP looks different than when playing back in QuickTime. I wonder if it can be a color management setting in FCP? I have the same problem when playing a clip in AE. I have two FCP machines, but only one of them is having this problem. Any ideas of what I can do to get the right colors back?

Have you enabled Final Cut Studio Color Compatibility in the QT Player preferences?

Need help The image I saw on the LCD looks different than the actual photo

i had canon camera and had problem The image I saw on the LCD looks different than the actual photo.any body can kelp me
[IMG]http://tralalatrilili.ga/thanks.png[/IMG]

Do you capture in RAW or JPEG? What software do you use to view your image? Is your monitor calibrated? What is the brightness level on your camera LCD? All of these information can affect your image. And keep in mind that image on the back of the camera is often brighter and more saturated.
Weekend Travelers Blog | Eastern Sierra Fall Color Guide

The way Aperture renders my Nikon RAW (NEF) files look different than...

The was Aperture renders my NEF files looks different than NX...
Ok so I use all the in camera setting/tools to the best of abilities to try and cut my editing down as much as possible but when shooting RAW I end up having to tweak every images to get them back to what they really look like... I shoot often RAW and JPG combined and when I open a NEF in NX and a JPG in PS they are identical and need very little work, when I use Aperture the NEF files are very different looking from the JPG (or NEF in NX) and every single one needs tweaking (I get more redish/pinkish skin, often a hint of green cast to (slightly off WB/tone thing) and more contrast.
Below is screenshot showing the difference between a JPG (or NEF in NX) and a RAW file in Aperture
[img]http://www.pbase.com/ray645/image/120052970/original.jpg[/img]
This is just a silly snap shot in very flat overcast light, and has the least amount of shift or difference of any image type so far, when I use strobes, shoot for a more contrasty image, gel for color and manual WB the differences are huge almost to the point that you would think you where looking at two completely different images and not the same NEF opened in different software.
How do I go about getting Aperture to render my NEF's more like what I shot like NEF in NX, JPG in anything, and even the back of the camera screen?

Thank you, that seems like will work, just having the boost turned down a bit on import has helped tremendously but I cant stop feeling like I am moving towards the "Fix it in post" mentality
I will need to get better at tweaking my images... No matter how I try I cant kill the pinking skin or the very faint green glow in blond hair or bright neutral tones without affecting other areas of the image.. I am sure I will figure it out but anyone having any tips or links that could speed up my process I would appreciate it.
The green is weird its like someone snuck a small florescent light into all my shoots without telling me, not major but enough to be annoying.
I shoot a ton of motor sports (3000 images a weekend) and shoot JPG and have gotten good at using in camera pre sets, knowing what I got and getting it right in the camera, I wish Nikon would give up the code or whatever is needed for all the info to be carried over to Aperture..... I would pay the $100 or whatever to use the NX engine in Aperture

Published Page Looks different than designed in IWeb

It's the oddest thing... I designed the site, using a blank template and building it from scratch. Every page displays fine, except for this one. It looks perfect in IWeb, but when published, even to my desktop folder, certain parts of two text boxes are transparent, showing the background behind it.
Here is the link to the page so you can see what I'm talking about:
http://www.terrybowdenfootballcamp.com/AboutTheCamps.html
Any ideas? Any help is GREATLY appreciated!
Thanks
Kim in FL

It appears that on the About the Camp page your text boxes don't have the fill enabled as they do in the other pages letting the page background show thru. Try clearing the text boxes and reapplying the fill. Or copy a text box from another page, replace the text with that of a problem box and see if that will fix it.
Another general fix would be to close iWeb, delete the iWeb preference file, com.apple.iWeb.plist, reboot the computer and try again.
OT
Message was edited by: Old Toad

Published site looks different on mac and pc?

having (finally) published my site, why do the fonts and layout look different on my mac to my husbnad's pc? v odd???

because different browsers interpret CSS files indifferent ways and because fonts that are installed on your mac may not necessarily be installed on your husbands pc. It is a common gripe of web designers (not just those using iWeb) that margins and padding (for example) are all read differently by IE than by FF.

Duplicate version looks different than original -- same adjustments

This morning I imported a few photos (D70 RAW), found they looked good with the default processing (no adjustments applied other than the default RAW 1.1 processing), and created duplicate versions to crop to different sizes. The duplicate versions look different -- the dark areas of the photos are lighter and noisier (sorry, still learning proper photo terminology). The duplicate versions have the identical adjustments (none). I tried toggling the cropping on/off, and the duplicate versions still look different.
This is very odd... has anybody else experienced this?
iMac 24" 2.16GHz Mac OS X (10.4.8) 2.0 GB RAM NVIDIA GeForce 7600 GT 256 MB Nikon D70

I did a little more investigation on this issue, and found that when I make the duplicate version, the image still looks identical. It is when I crop the image that things get messed up -- even if I then remove the crop adjustment.

Just bought MSI R5770 and card looks different than expected

I bought this as an open Box from Fry's today.
When I opened it up, the card looks completely different than the pictures I've seen online.
The label on the back says it is a R5770 PMD1G and the serial number on the label matches the one on the box. But the fan/heatsink combination is completely different. The board layout (capacitors, etc) seems to be different as well
I'm especially concerned by the small size of the fan compared to what I was expecting.
Before I install it, I wanted to make sure I actually have the correct card that I paid for. Here is a link to a pic.

Quote from: Sansfear on 04-May-10, 19:29:16
She slapped a new reduced price sticker on it and assured me that they'd test it to make sure it worked. I'm willing to bet that if I go back there in a few days, that it will be back on the shelves and still have the wrong card in the box.
I wouldn't expect anything less from them. It was probably back on the shelf 15 minutes after you walked out. If its worth anything, I don't buy anything open box. The small savings isn't worth the hassle.

Lightroom Image Looks Different than in Windows Viewer/CS5/etc.

I've seen this discussed elsewhere, but I believe the nature of my issue may be a bit different, so please excuse the repeat inquiry.
I'm currently using Lightroom 3 on a 17' Samsung Syncmaster 920NW on two different desktops. The hardware configuration for each machine is also identical, with only a few minor exceptions. However, the images on one machine display drastically differently in Lightroom, as opposed to any other Windows application. I've updated the video drivers for both computers, reinstalled the monitor drivers for both, and have uninstalled/reinstalled Lightroom on both with no success in remedying the discrepancy.
Any assistance would be greatly appreciated in finding a solution to this issue. It's very frustrating to be anchored down to one desktop due to the inconsistencies of the other.
Thanks!

You need to calibrate both monitors to identical settings, the luminance value being very important, using an appropriate calibration tool and software.
Spyder Elite software has a specific settings too enable you to match monitors across machines in a studio setting, or from a desk top to a laptop. Without calibration images in viewed in colour managed applications will always look different. If you do not wish to colour manage you can always set a colour space such as sRGB as a monitor profile on all the machines, the only difference you will see then will be down to the luminance value of the monitor. However this will mean images viewed on other peoples screens may differ markedly from your own. The real solution to colour problems is to use colour management and this means calibration of your monitor as a basic requirement.

'Play Full Screen' looks different than 'play' (makes timing errors)

In iMovie, 'Play Full Screen' behaves differently than 'Play' Makes timing errors, cuts off the beginning of commentaries, etc.

You can't disable tap/zoom scaling. What happens if you add a margin and disable thumbnail?
Can you convert them to a Keynote presentation (Hype?)?
One option would be to reduce the original video dimensions and add a frame/mask around it before adding into a book, that way when it is expanded, it sits at a smaller size. Bunch of work, maybe, so unless you have higher rez video, that may be your best option.

920 cartridge looks different than the old one

I just bought some new ink cartridges for my Officejet 6500a 710n-z printer. I bought the same 920 XL cartridges that I have bought and successfully installed before. However, the most recent ones would not install!
These new cartridges are different than the others -- on the bottom, they only have the gold-colored contact plate. The others had the gold plate and a little bubble-like item that I think was called an ink window. Other than that, the cartridges are exactly the same.
Have these cartridges changes? What do I need to do to make them work in my printer?
This question was solved.
View Solution.

Hello BezaNH,
Welcome to the HP Support Forums!
Sorry to hear about the issues with the Officejet 6500 not reading the new generation cartridges. I believe I found a document that may help you resolve this.
Some steps you will have done such as, remove and install cartridges, I would still suggest following through with all the steps. The images of the cartridges are that of the older generations cartridges, the steps are the same regardless.
'The following ink cartridge appears to be missing or damaged' Error Message Displays on the Printer....
Let me know how those steps work out, I will be keeping an eye on the thread.
JERENDS
I work on behalf of HP
Please click “Accept as Solution” if you feel my post solved your issue, it will help others find the solution.
Click the “Kudos Thumbs Up" to the left of the reply button to say “Thanks” for helping!

A page ie6 looks different than in other browsers

The site is www.GigHarborWashington.com
When viewed in most browsers it renders correctly. When viewed in ie6 a white border on the right is added with approx 180 pixels. Additionally, a portion of the image behind the nav bar is repeated and the text on the 3rd image is cut off. I tried adding no-repeat to the areas of question and it created problems in ie7
I have attached my css file. Any suggestions on how to repair these problems in ie6 without affecting other browsers?
Thank you,
Mike

Thank you Nancy,
I am off to a meeting but will work on this later and respond if that was the solution or not.
Regards,
Mike

Published content is different than what was designed in iWeb

I have saved some changes to my web site and now the published site shows pictures rearranged, dupicate pictures, and a picture where there should be text. the published site is www.gregoryzsmith.com and the page that is having problems is the Issues page. The screen shot attached is what has been designed in iWeb. I do not understand what happened here and cannot seem to get this straigntened out. Any assistance would be appreciated.
AKS

It seems to have worked itself out. Must have been a problem with the server. Thank you for your response.
Allison

HTML report looks different than REPORTS PREVIEWER

I am having a weird problem with my reports. My reports look just fine in the Oralce Reports Developer live previewer. However when I look at the Report Server generated HTML format of the same report, the label on the right side of the page gets truncated. When I change the justification of this label to left justified as opposed to the current setting, then it appears fine. I need this label to be right justified to align with the currency fields below it. Is this an Oracle Bug? Is there something I can do without having to try to layout my report all over again.
Thanks for any advice in advance.

Hi
The output shown on the live previewer will be different then the output generated through server becuase live previewer uses different resolution and fonts. We have not heard of any truncation issue in html output. You nedd to have a proper printer installed which shall be accessible to Report server i.e. if if the Report server owner has the proviledges to print to that printer. Try running Report runtime in batch mode with the same reports to check the Report output. If you can get it right in rwrun60, you will get the same output through Report server also.
Thanks
Rohit

Why does my newly published website look different in every browser?

It looks closest to what I created when viewing in IE. Graphics are screwed up in Firefox, and colors are wrong in Safari. Also, my add to cart buttons work in Firefox and Safari but not in IE. Can anyone help??

You need to be aware of the limitations of the various browsers and make sure you use web-safe fonts and colors.....
http://www.iwebformusicians.com/WebMusic/FontsandColors.html
Do a Command A on all your pages in iWeb to make sure that objects/text boxes are not touching or overlapping.
Firefox has problems with displaying drop shadows/frames etc.
To get help with specific issues you would need to tell us the URL of our site.

Published page looks different than iweb page

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for