Purch Req get deleted once the maintenance order is TECO'ed

Guys,
Purchase requistion is automatically get deleted once I do the TECO, I think there should be a config to restrict this. Could anyopne knwo what I need to do for this. Thanks.

Hi Praveen ,
TECO is assigned to work which is Technically completed (Physical work  completed ).
When Maintenance work required for the Order is completed , it means that excess material and services planned are no longer required.
Hence Purchase requisition is automatically get deleted once you do the TECO .
Any purchase requisitions that have not been converted into purchase orders are deleted . This is standard functionality.
Though system allows you to do the following
a)Locked or Unlocked
b)Set deletion flag
c) you can still post some cost like invoice receipt for material delivered or consumed
User Exits will surely help you in this Scenario ,  Your ABAP team will be able to help you here  .
Regards
Arif

Similar Messages

  • What to do with the Sales Order once the Production Order is TECO?

    Hi everybody,
    What to do after a Production Order is confirmed, GI, GR, and the Production Order is Technically Complete?
    In MD04, I can still see the Sales Order, and I can see also the line with CSTOCK (Customer Stock).
    What to do now to complete the scenario?
    Thanks in advance,
    Rudy.

    Thank you!
    But I get the following message in VL01N:
    "No schedule lines due for delivery up to the selected date "
    What does it mean exacly?
    I have a Confirmed Production Order.
    I have a quantity in CSTOCK.
    So, what is missing here?
    Thanks in advance!
    Rudy

  • Do all things that have been purchased from the iTunes Store get deleted once the iPod's firmware has been updated?

    Hiya,
    The title says it all.
    Cheers, Kar

    - You can only sync with one computer/iTunes library.  It sounds like you want to switch you syncing computer.
    - To change your syncing computer you have to erase your iPod and restore the iPod.  You can try making a backup of the iPod by right-clicking on the iPod under devices in iTunes and select the backup option.  However, that option may not be available.  If not available, and if you can't get the backup file from the old computer you will have to restore to factory defaults/new computer.
    - If you update as is you iPod will be erases and replaced with what is now in the iTunes libray.  App data will be lost.

  • Scehdule Line Date getting change to future date once the Sales Order is saved

    Hello Experts,
    Good Morning to you all,
    This is with respect to the Issue we are facing for the Orders having Product Allocation on multiple materials. Please find enclosed the detials below.
    Issue : Scehdule Line Date getting change to future date once the Sales Order is saved. These Order's are having Product Allocation on multiple materials.
    Description:
    We have implemented Product Allocation few months back.
    We have Product Allocation on multiple materials which are in demand and has been reserved for the Customers of different PA behaviors.
    When we are trying to create the Sales Orders for the normal customer who is not on Product Allocation. The Order Schedule Line is getting changed to future date once the Sales Order is saved after initial creation.
    These Order's are having materials of Product Allocation.
    I have enclosed the sample screen shot of the error we are getting which saving the Sales Order and also the Order Schedule Line screen shot showing future date.
    Error Message : There may be Product Over Allocation in Delivery Group 001.
    Message No : VV023
    This is a random behavior we are coming across and out of 10 Order 2 or 3 Orders is getting this Issue.
    Please share your inputs how to rack this Issue.
    Your suggestions will be highly appreciated.
    I am unable to upload the attacments dont know what the reason.
    Thanks,
    Farhan.

    Check whether you need to carry out the coding corrections as recommended in the following note:-
    Note 52067 - Message VV023/VV024, but no prod.alloc.processing    
    But I wonder this is for older versions and not sure whether this would help you to overcome from the issue.
    G. Lakshmipathi

  • How to check, when the Maintenance Order was deleted

    Hello Experts,
                          Can you please tell me of how to check for the maintenance order that when it was deleted and who has deleted that.
    If any T-Code is there or at the Table level also to check the requirement.
    Regards,
    Yawar Khan

    If you want to track when you have put deletion flag, you can track it using above mentioned techniques.
    If you archived (deleted) permanently, then using archival history only, you can check I guess.
    Check these links. While deleting maintenance order, we can hisorical order with same number. Using that creation date, you can track.
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/8d/3e6552462a11d189000000e8323d3a/content.htm
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/8d/3e4d2f462a11d189000000e8323d3a/frameset.htm

  • Set deletion flag in the maintenance order

    Hi all,
    Am not able to set the deletion flag from the maintenance order, the :set: button is not active. can anyone help me in this regards?
    Or is there any tcode for setting deletion flag to maintenance orders?
    Thanks
    Anish

    hi
    i think it is probably authorization issue ie you don't have the authorization to put the deletion flag
    or check whether you have technically completed the order ,if not try to TECO and then try
    regards
    thyagarajan

  • Budget Process (Linked the maintenance Order into Internal Order) in EAM

    Dear Experts,
    Scenario for Repair & Maintenance with only MM & FICO module live w.e.f. 2007 (PM not live)
    Process Managed thru Internal Order (Order Type: RPMT)
    Budget managed through Investment Management (IM); Budget is directly entered against the IO using transaction IM52
    Scenario for Repair & Maintenance with only MM, FICO & PM module live (PM went live in 2010)
    It was proposed to assign budget against each Maintenance Order.  Since the number of maintenance orders being used is very high, it was decided to link the MO & IO so that budget will be assigned to the IO and when the MO is settled against the IO, the budget in IO can be deducted accordingly. The proposed process to assign budget in Internal Order against each Maintenance Order are given below-:
    1.)     In EAM process one can plan/procure material and External Services only when the Maintenance Order is created & released but practically it has to be planned long before any Maintenance Activity (Maintenance Order to be linked with the estimate so that PO can be created against the estimate).
    2.)     The no. of Maintenance Order generated in EAM Module is very large as Maintenance order is created for almost each and every maintenance activity. It is cumbersome to allocate the budget to each and every maintenance order. There should be a single estimate for maintenance activity (as in MM module) and that should be linked to maintenance order so that the actual cost of Indent/Service Entry Sheet can be deducted automatically from the estimate (Maintenance Order is to be linked with estimate).
    3.)      While doing return Indent the cost of return material is not being added to the maintenance order automatically (Maintenance Order is to be linked with estimate).
    4.)      If Material & External Services not planned in the maintenance order (estimate), the user must be able to do that through Internal Order (estimate), hence the Internal Order must be link to the Maintenance Order. They should able to record the planned & actual cost in the maintenance Order.
    Process followed:
    1.) Created Internal Order in KO01 for Repair & Maintenance Order Type
         Assigned budget to Internal Order thru IM52
    2.) Created PM order and assigned Internal order against Settlement Order in tab  
         u2018Locationu2019 and in Settlement Rule with 100%. In this Section attach the Internal  
         Order with selection type u2018ORDu2019. 
    3.) Released both orders and issue the Material for particular Operation and then   
         determine the Cost for material .After that performed MIGO for consumption of
         materials.
    4.) Settled the PM order in KO88.
         Settlement process was successfully saved.
    Problem faced:
    After posting the goods movement (against each Maintenance Order) and settlement of the maintenance order against IO, we still find the budget assigned to the IO is not consumed/deducted.
    1. Actual cost of maintenance is not reflected in the internal order
        immediately. We have to run cost settlement (t-code KO88) for the
        maintenance order each time the actual cost is incurred in the maintenance order.
    2. Also in the case of return indent, the value of returned material is not directly 
        added to the available budget of internal order.
    3. When the material is issued from store through the reservation generated by 
        maintenance order, system does not check for budget in the internal  
        order/maintenance order while issuing material from the store.
    4.  It must not be allowed to create reservation from the internal order of order type
         RPMT.
    5.  In case of external service in the maintenance order, the unit of
         measure in the requisition is set to u201CD (days)u201D by default. System does not allow  
         changing the unit of measure in the requisition (it should allow to change the unit
         of measure or set the unit of measure u201CJOBu201D).
    6.) When the material is issued from  the store through reservation generated  in
         maintenance order, system does not check for budget in Internal Order  
         (estimate)/Maintenance Order while issuing material from store.
    Thanks & Regards
    Deepak Soni

    Hi,
    1. Actual cost of maintenance is not reflected in the internal order
    immediately. We have to run cost settlement (t-code KO88) for the
    maintenance order each time the actual cost is incurred in the maintenance order.
    As per the standard system budgeting is done against the actual cost only. And until you settle your order the actual cost from
    maint order are not getting transfered to IO. Once they are transfered system is checking for the budget.
    2. Also in the case of return indent, the value of returned material is not directly added to the available budget of internal order.
    This is similar to first point, when you return goods there will be negative cost on the order, this has to be settled until that system will not compare the IO budget with maintenance order actual cost.
    3. When the material is issued from store through the reservation generated by maintenance order, system does not check for budget in the internal order/maintenance order while issuing material from the store.
    The budget you have assigned is at IO, how can system will check the budget while issueing goods for maintenance order. We may have to develop or use some user exit over here. Which will trigger checking of budget from the settlement receiver IO for that maintenance order.
    I think you may have to go for development. These are my observations from my experience.
    Regards,
    NNR

  • Reg. Capacity levelling for the maintenance order

    Hi all,
    I am using SAP R3 ECC6.0.
    I have created a maintenance order with order type PM01(Internal).In this order i have assigned Work Center 1 with the Work center category as Labour.And i have assigned 2 operations for this Work center in the maintenance order with the total hours of 60 HRS. and i saved this order & made the status to release.
    Then i went to Tcode CM33 and there i inputed the Work center name and executed it.It opens a Graphical View.But in that view my order no is not displayed .Previous order no. which is there already for that Work center is shown there.
    What could be the Reason.
    As an alternate checking i went to T code CM31 order view.There i Inputed my order no. and executed it but it throws a message
    "No Capacity requirements were found in the evaluation period"
    "No work centers or orders were found"
    What could be the reason.
    Tell me how to overcome this issue.
    More over i want to make dispatch in the capacity levelling.
    Thanks in advance,
    M.Badrinarain.

    hi badri,
    are you checking in the same period ? and next check ur overall profile and time profile assigned to ur overall profile .... u will find order no , operation no .... and once u dispatch operation status gets DSPT .
    regards
    pushpa

  • Error : Period dimension 'Period' is missing a Base Time Period member 'Jun' that has been deleted since the last deployment. Base Time Period members cannot be deleted once the dimension is deployed

    HI,
    I am using V11.1.2.2 Hyperion Planning. I am currently getting an error:
    Error : Period dimension 'Period' is missing a Base Time Period member 'Jun' that has been deleted since the last deployment. Base Time Period members cannot be deleted once the dimension is deployed
    This is what i got when i tried to add alternate hierarchy to my shared dimension. I tried to delete it and it messed up.
    NOw it wont deploy my application.
    Can any one suggest.
    Thanks in advance
    Cheers,
    XXX

    EPMA!!!!! EPMA!!!!
    I'm playing around with it to write a blog post and it is crazy. Only possible workaround (till now i'm not able to figure out a solution to it) is to copy the application and deploy it as a new one. Take copy of all objects (forms, tasklist etc). Delete the corrupted application and rename the new one to old.
    Regards
    Celvin
    http://www.orahyplabs.com

  • VA00 condition type not getting determined for the returns order

    Hi All,
    I have a case where VA00 condition type not getting determined for the returns order that has been created with respect to the billing document.
    When the pricing conditions are being copied from invoice it is getting copied but later it is getting deleted in the include LV61AA42.
    Note:VA00 condition type is getting deleted from the  internal table tkomv[].
    If any one came across  this scenario can you please help me.
    Request your valuable inputs

    Hi,
    Please check the copy control setting in VTAA.
    Maintain the pricing type as "D" at item category level for the respective document type .
    Hope this will resolve your issue.
    Regards,
    Krishna O

  • Set as default value the Item Category in the Maintenance Order

    Hello everyone,
    We are trying to find a user exit in order to set as default value the item category in the Maintenance Order once the Material has been introduced (Tag Components).
    SAP Customizing let the user set the Item Category automatically per Material Type, but we need to set different Item Categories to materials belonging to the same material type.
    We would really appreciate any help relating this issue.
    Thank you very much,
    Víctor Liedo

    Dear Paul,
    Thank you very much for your response.
    I had already tried customizing mentioned by Pithan, but it did not work because we need to set different Item Categories for Materials with same Material Type.
    We have been searching for exits which may let us set Item Category in the Maintenance Order, but it does not seem to be possible.
    What you say about adding some custom validation through user exit, not to set item category as default value, but to check if the one entered is valid, sounds the best way of achieving our commitments.
    I have tried to look for CNEX0037 & CNEX0038, by using transactions SE37 and SE38, search for programs and functions modules, but it did not work. Could you please tell us what kind of objects are?
    Thank you very much in advance.
    Víctor Liedo

  • Why my ipad photos gets deleted but the blank album exists?

    I am a new ipad  user. please advise me why every time my photos which i am copying from lappy is getting deleted but the blank album is not! I am saving the copied photos in diffeent album all the time still its getting deleted in my ipad!
    I need old photos as well as the new album am copying ! Please help! I got a presentation tomorrow and i need to copy so many photos to copy from my lappy! 

    Pictures on Photo Stream remain there for only 30 days by design.  So if you setup PS on your Mac and add photos to it they will display on the iPad.  However, to remain on the iPad you will have to move them to the Camera Roll (I only have an iPhone and that's what it's called on it) in order to keep them permanently.  This screenshot shows the save options  on the iPhone when photos in the Photo Stream are seledted. Notice the option in the lower right hand corner:
    It probably is similar on the iPad.
    Or, you can put the photos in an album in iPhoto and connect the iPad to your Mac.  Open iTunes and go to the iPad's Pictures section.  There you can select the album in iPhoto and sync those photos to the iPad where they will be in the Camera Roll section.l

  • Fax the Maintenance order to the person responsible to work center

    Hello
    The business requirement is that the maintenance order should be faxed to the person responsible for the main work center used in the maintenance order.
    Please suggest any work around if possible.
    Thanks for your reply.
    Regards
    Santosh

    hello pete,
    the business requirement is that i need to send the work order to the main work center of the order for which the fax no of the main work center will be populate automaticall at the time of or before clicking on print/fax order in iw32, in standard scenerio i can get the fax no from partner function but in this case i do not know how to map it.
    regards,
    Santosh

  • Problem in maintaining the settlement rule in the maintenance order

    Dear Friends,
    I have a problem ,When  I am trying to maintain the settlement rule in the maintenance order ,I am getting information like below
    Decentralized system -> note settlement rule is not distributed
    Message no. /ISDFPS/PM124
    Diagnosis
    You navigated to the settlement rule.
    System Response
    The system informs you that a settlement rule can be created but that it will not be distributed to the target system. Settlement is carried out in the target system, where the order is usually settled to the WBS element of the operation.
    Can anyone throw some light on how this is happeing and remedy?
    Appreciating your early response

    Hello
    Please check
    TC --> KSR2_ORC
    Please maintain the Strategy Sequences for Automatic Generation of Settlement Rule.
    You define a strategy sequence for automatic generation of settlement rules for internal orders.
    Regards,
    Rakesh
    Edited by: RAKESH ASHOK MANE on Sep 3, 2010 12:37 PM

  • Excise rate and value is not getting defaulted from the purchase order

    Hi all,
    While capturing excise invoice , the excise rate and value is not getting defaulted from the purchase order and in Excise Item Tab BED,AED,ECS is Zero at both header as well as item level for only one material in STO process and if we are doing same process taking other material all things are coming perfectly and We are maintaining condition with respect to vendor,plant and material combination.Any input related to this will be helpfull and rewarded.
    Regards
    Vishal

    Hi,
    Follow STO Process for this;
    1.Create a vendor for the company code of receiving plant, using account group: 0007 using T-Code XK01.
    2. Assign this vendor to Delivering plant
    Go to XK02 >Purchasing view>Extras>Add. Purchasing data>Plant
    3. Create internal customer with the sales area of the vendor. Go To XD01
    4. In pricing procedure determination relevant to STO, assign document Pricing Procedure and customer pricing procedure appropriate for STO to get the pricing in the invoice.
    5. Maintain condition records for the relevant pricing condition.
    6. Some more setting for STO: Go to MM> Purchasing > Purchase Order > Set up STO > define shipping data for plants > Go to Receiving plant >assign customer here & Supplying SA (for billing) to Receiving plant here
    7. Go to MM > Purchasing > Purchase Order > Set up STO > define shipping data for plants > Go to Supplying plant and assign the sales area of receiving plant.
    8. Go to MM > Purchasing > Purchase Order > Set up STO > assign delivery Type & Checking rule
    Assign the delivery type to document type. In this case, Delivery type NLCC is assigned to Document type NB
    9. Go to MM> Purchasing > Purchase Order > Set up STO > Assign document Type, One step Procedure, Under delivery tolerance
    Assign the document type NB to supplying plant and receiving plant
    10. After all settings, Create the STO using T-Code: ME21N and maintain pricing conditions of freight and Save.
    11. In supplying plant Maintain condition record in sales using VK11 the same will flow in receiving plant when referring the OBD no during MIGO.
    10. Create Delivery: VL10G
    12. Picking, PGI: VL02N
    13. Billing: VF01
    Save the document and its done
    14. J1IIN - Outgoing Excise Invoice
    15. MIGO - Goods Receipt against outbound Delivery
    16. J1IEX - Capture & Post Excise Invoice
    Rgs

Maybe you are looking for