Purchase order commitment - retrospective generation

Hello all,
I would like to ask, if it is possible to retrospective generate a purchase order commitment.
Until now, we didn't had activated the commitment for some order types.
Now, we are going to activate it and I wonder if it is possible to retrospective generate commitment for all those orders.
Thanks a lot
Regards
Peter

Hi Peter,
You may try to run RKANBU01 report and afterwards RKACOR04 report. I'd suggest to do it in test system first. You may look at note 152571 for further information.
Regards,
Eli

Similar Messages

  • There is still a purchase order commitment for WBS

    Hi All,
    We need to close  whole project while closing I am getting the attached error.
    There is still a purchase order commitment for WBS
    Additional Information or Comments: = I have checked and closed all purchases order commitment. But still the project shows the below error     .
    Edited by: nandhasapfi on Sep 22, 2011 10:52 AM

    Hello,
    This message is being output correctly as the AuC still has
    values against it.
    These values must be cleared before you can close the WBS element.
    Please do a FUL settlement against the WBS element to clear
    these values and then try to set the CLSD status again.
      There are two ways to 'clean' the AuC, so that you can deactivate it
      and close the wbs element:
      1. Post a manual retirement of the AuC to clean it.
      2. Create a new AuC and use it for all the differences in the final
         settlement.
    I hope this helps,
    regards
    Ray

  • Purchase Order Commitment Item

    Hi,
    Could you please help us to solve this issue
    When we trying to business completion of Maintenance Order the system is giving the error message "There is still a Purchase Order commitment for Order".
    We have seen there is one Purchase order created from the maintenance order and the invoice is created for this PO. After that user set deletion flag for this Purchase Order and PR also. But still the system is giving the commitment item open error message.

    Hi
    Use T Code SE38 and execute the program RKANBU01 mentioning the Maintenance Order to which assigned in PR/PO.
    If still problem persists, then undo the deletion flag & set final invoice indicator for the PO and then check.It must allow then
    Thanks,
    Manish
    Edited by: Manish Chachra on Aug 22, 2008 8:23 AM
    Edited by: Manish Chachra on Aug 22, 2008 8:26 AM

  • PM - MM order can not be completed due to purchase order commitment

    Hi
    The error "There is still a purchase order commitment for ORD XXXXX" comes up when I try to complete an order in the transaction IW32. I pressed the cancel button then the information box comes up with the text "Order has status "technically completed"". I checked if there is any open PO assigned to this PM order. Yes there is one which was already GRposted and invoiced in 2006. Final invoice indicator has been set too.
    I would appreciate a lot if you can help me regarding how to complete this order? Is it a program error.
    Regards,
    Esra

    Hi Thyagarajan
    I checked the operations in the PM-order. There are two external processing operations. One has an aggrement which has the validity end 2005-12-31. I don`t see where to see if the other operation is assigned to a purchasing document. In the menu path, extras, cost reports there is a PO which was already invoiced and GR-posted.
    I don`t know where to look for more if there are any open purchasing documents?
    Thanks.
    Esra

  • Stock mouvement 351 from purchase order : committed quantity

    Hello,
    I currently have MRP running for a division. It creates purchase requisitions with the quantity necessary to transfer. In ME59N there is a check availability between the purchase requisition and the purchase order (transfer between division). So in my purchase order, there are 2 different quantities available : schedule quantity and committed quantity.
    Schedule quantity is the same quantity as in the purchase requisition.
    Committed quantity is equal to the schedule quantity if there is enough stock in the issuing plant. If there is not enough, the committed quantity is equal to the quantity available in the issuing plant.
    So far everything is perfect. But when I create my stock movement 351 in MIGO or MB1B, I can't find a way to select the committed quantity by default. The movement is related to the purchase order, and selects automatically the schedule quantity.
    Is there a standard way to force the committed quantity in the movement 351?
    Thanks in advance for your help!

    Hi Charlotte,
    In standard SAP it not possible to have committed quantity in MIGO or MB1B, by default system will pickup the open quantity (schedule line quantity). But if try to execute the good movements (351) it will give you the error of quantity deficit M7 021 ("Stock Deficit") if you try to withdraw more than available ( committed quantity).
    Also note committed quantity is only updated with the ATP check, but will not be changed automatically per goods movement. it is the standard behavior.
    Regards,
    R.Brahmankar

  • Purchase order IDoc PORDCH generation error

    Hi all,
    I have made all the settings in the partner profiles to trigger PORDCH IDoc when I create or change purchase order through output message type.
    But the error it gives in WE05 is the following:
    The segment E1EDK01 does not occur at the current level of the basic type PORDCR01 (extension ).
    This error can have several reasons:
    The segment E1EDK01 is assigned to a group whose header segment does not occur.
    The segment E1EDK01 does not exist in the syntax description of the basic type PORDCR01 (extension ).
    The sequence of segments in the group in which the segment appears is incorrect.
    Previous errors ('mandatory' segment or group missing) may be due to this error.
    Since the generated IDoc is of ORDERS05 structure this is giving an error.
    Can anybody help me out with this.

    Jwalith
    It seems, you are using wrong Process Code/Inbound Function Module .... Create new process code or modify your Z-Process Code to link it to function module IDOC_INPUT_PORDCH, which is valid for Message Type PORDCH.
    This should solve the problem.
    Thanks
    Amol Lohade

  • Purchase Order Commitment release

    Hi,
    We have some Open POs which does not have confirmations. When we create PO, system automatically creates commitments. So, when there is no confirmation for PO, Then corresponding commitments never turn to actuals and just sit there.
    So, is there any transaction code or function module which i can use to release or cancel commitments for POs.
    Do we have 'Final invoice' flag for PO in SRM just like as ME23N in R/3?
    It would be much appreciated if you could share me some ideas.
    thanks,
    Macs

    Hi
    <u>We have faced similar issue, some time back. We were using SRM 5.0 version at that time.
    We applied this OSS Note.</u>
    <b>Note 786854 - Modification note in order to deactivate commitments</b>
    Hope this will help.
    Please reward suitable points.
    Regards
    - Atul

  • Commitment in Purchase contracts and purchase order

    Hi,
    We are loading contract through LSMW. As account assignment we are just passing the cost center and the account is configure in OKB9.  However for some contract the flag is set in items affect commitments and the wrong account is determine. I want to know if this behavior is normal and why? How do you know how commitment is set up in the system?
    I have also seen that for some purchase order there are commitment lines that have been created in table COOI. Those pruchase order has been created through idoc and here again we do set the commitment flag.
    Thank you for your help

    Hi,
    Please consider that purchasing documents which do not have facility of GR, can not create commitment, hence commitment is not available for contracts.
    In case you want PR commitment to be adjusted against PO, please ensure that along with contract, PR number should also be filled in PO.Here I mean for EKPO-BANFN should be filled in PO then commitment would not be double.
    Case 1 with contract:
    When you post Purchase requisition.
    - Purchase requisition updates commitment.
    - You see purchase requisition amount in the report S_ALR_87013558.
    When you post Contract with reference to the Purchase Requistion:
    - Purchase requistion commitment stays as it is.
    - Contract doesn't update the commitment.
    - You see purchase requisition in the reprot S_ALR_87013558.
    When you post a purchase order with reference to contract:
    - Purchase requistion commitment stays as it is.
    - Contract doesn't update the commitment,
       When PO posted with reference to contract, there is no   commitment reduction for the contract either.
    - Purchase Order commitment is updated.
    - You see purchase requisition and order in the report S_ALR_87013558.
    Case 2 without contract:
    When you post Purchase requisition.
    - Purchase requisition updates commitment.
    - You see purchase requisition amount in the reprot S_ALR_87013558.
    When you post a purchase order with reference to requisition:
    - Purchase requistion commitment is reduced by PO posting
    - purchase order commitment is updated.
    - You see only the purchase order amount in the report S_ALR_87013558.
    The  attached note 151451 describes also the system behaviour.
    regards
    Waman

  • Vendor postings with purchase order

    hi,
    I am learning SAP Fi/co.I have one doubt .what are steps we have to maintain to post vendor transactions with purchase order.if u have any material about mm plz send to me.

    Commitment
    Definition
    Identifies costs that will be incurred in the future for materials and services that you have requested or ordered. Commitments reserve funds that will become costs at a future date.
    Use
    On the account assignment objects, Commitments Management portrays the cost side of the procurement process for MM Purchasing. The costs incurred are assigned to business objects, such as orders, cost centers, or projects.
    In Commitments Management, you can specify which object the costs are to be assigned to (for example, purchase order costs). In this case, this is known as an Initial Account Assignment.
    Commitments Management distinguishes between three types of commitments, depending on the account assignment object:
    Order Commitment:
    The commitment is initially assigned to an order.
    Cost Center Commitment:
    The commitment is initially assigned to a cost center.
    Project Commitment:
    The commitment is initially assigned to a project, or to a work breakdown structure element.
    For more information, see the SAP Library:
    For Internal Orders
    Financials ® Controlling ® Internal orders ®  Manual Actual Postings On Internal Orders.
    For Cost Center Accounting
    Financials ® Controlling ® Cost Center Accounting ®  Manual Actual Postings.
    For Project System
    Financials ® Controlling ®  Commitments/Actual Updates Of Transaction Data
    Integration
    Commitments occur
    In Purchasing, due to:
    Purchase requisitions (purchase requisition commitment) define the internal requirement for a material or a service. Purchase requisitions have a control function and you change them at any time.
    Purchase orders (purchase order commitment):
    Purchase orders are contractual requests to a vendor, to supply certain goods or services according to the agreed conditions. No short-term, unilateral changes can be made.
    due to funds commitments (commitment for funds commitments):
    - You can use Funds Commitments to reserve funds for costs you are fairly certain to incur, but you cannot yet assign to a specific business transaction (such as, a purchase order or a purchase requisition).
    Regards,
    SUbha

  • There is still a purchse order commitment for ORD X for CO_ORDER archiving obj

    Dear Experts,
    I am facing issue for CO_ORDER archiving object. I am getting error saying like
    " there is still a purchase order commitment for ORD 200060" and
    "order 200060 still has at least one purchase order that you need to do".
    screen shot attached for reference
    so Please help me to solve this issue.
    Thanks in advance,
    Ningappa S M

    Hello Manju Sir,
    Now that issue setting of deletion indicator is got successful. I mean I set residence time 1 as 0 and I tried to archive and I got successful. but I am facing the issue saying " there is still a purchase order commitment" , "there is a still Purchase requisition assigned to order" and
    "still has at least one purchase order that you need to delete" etc for all orders when i set residence time 1 as 39 months (even i tried by setting the residence time 1 as zero i am getting the same error messages) and residence time 2 as 0. for these orders deletion flag itself is not getting set. so please help me for this.
    Thanks,
    Ningappa

  • WBS & Commitment Code Update in Purchase Order/Down Payment

    Sir,
    We have created purchase orders by using WBS and Commitment Code and
    afterwards, the down payments has been created against the purchase
    Orders.
    Now we want to change the WBS and Commitment Code in Purchase Orders
    and also in Down Payment Request so that the data and reports can be
    updated as per the changes.
    Pl suggest the way how can we do the same so that our data can be
    updated as per the changes in purchase orders.
    Regards
    Mudit Gupta

    Why do you want to change the same now?Has the user entered wrong WBS and Commitment Code?
    I yes then cancel the down payment,delete the po & pr...and then through CJ20N create a new automatic pr with correct WBS and Commitment Code.
    Regards,
    Indranil

  • Open Purchase order can we maintain commitment item for the year

    hi
    my requirement is for the year open purchase orders we need to maintain commitment item previously it was not maintain from this year we need to maintain is it posssible

    Hi
    If your PO has an IO or WBS or a Cost center maintained in it - Run the Program RKANBU01 in SE38 and it will push all the past data of commitments into the CO objects
    You need to activate Commitment management in OKKP as well as in IO Type... If IO was created w/o the tick ON, then I believe you dont have a choice here..
    br, Ajay M

  • Sales order ATP vs Purchase order inventory commitment

    Hello,
    Have issue and hope someone can advise.  The basic problem is sales order is receiving confirmed ATP against inventory, even though that inventory is consumed by a purchase order.
    Here's the flow:
    1.  Plant A (receiving):  places purchase order (doc type NB) & commits all of whatu2019s in stock at plant B
    2.  Plant B (supplying):  standard sales order is created after above purchase order for identical material, date, quantity
    Check rule (t/c OVZ9) for sales order is ticked for u201CInc. purchase ordersu201D
    Not sure if this has bearing, but these plants are under different company code so thisu2019d be intercompany.
    Expectation is the sales order in this scenario would receive delivery commit per lead time on the material (since it was created after the PO), but instead it is happening against stock already given to the purchase order.  Any suggestions on what is needed to fix so the sales order does not get ATP from stock already committed to a purchase order?  Thanks

    Hi,
    In T.code OVZ9, for your availability checking rule and Availability check combination, you need to select value X or A, in the field Incl. release order requirements.
    Regards,

  • Committed Delivery Date in a Purchase Order?

    Commmited Delivery Date in Purchase Order?
    Can any one tell me , how is the commited delivery date in Purchase Order Determined!
    I get a date which is sunday as committed delivery date but according to Route Calendar and shipping
    point calendar sunday is not a working day?
    Any suggestions?
    Thanks!

    Hi,
    find this notes might be use full for you .
    Commitment dates switch for calculation rule
    Key that controls how the commitment quantities should be calculated per sales document type.
    Use
    The commitment date is calculated using the delivery time for releases to contracts with delivery times, or sales orders that refer to quotations containing delivery times. The committed quantity results from the agreed delivery time or the confirmed quantity, according to the calculation rule set here.
    Dependencies
    You can set the following calculation rules:
    A: Consider agreed delivery time
    Here, all required schedule lines are committed for the date that lies at the agreed distance from the delivery time, according to the date on which the order was placed. If the customer requests a later date, this can be confirmed. The confirmation does not affect the calculation. If you do not enter a delivery time, the system does not calculate a committed quantity.
    B: First confirmation date
    The committed quantity is calculated according to the first confirmed quantities.  If a delivery time exists for the item, the system takes it into account, as in calculation rule A, and confirms the earlier date. The commitment date is recalculated if the material, quantity, first date, or delivery time change. The quantities confirmed then are valid once the document has been saved.
    C: First confirmation date
    Rule C is the same as calculation rule B but for new items. If you save a document again but the system can confirm more for the customer, the more favorable situation will be saved as the commitment. As in rule B, the commitment date will be recalculated if changes are made to the material, quantity, requested delivery date, or delivery time.
    No entry
    Commitment dates are not calculated or displayed.
    With best Regards,
    venkataswamy.y

  • Purchase Order CO/FM Commitment

    Dear Experts ,
    We have define new price procedure for Purchase Orders :
    10 Basic price - for G/L 1  ( Example 100)
    20 Freight cost - For G/L 2  (Example 5% )
    30 MWST - Input Tax defined to all above conditions  ( Example 16.5% )
    The Order Conditions Total calculation is right and the tax is calculated on the total (Basic price + Freight cost )
    And we got in Total:  100+5 + 17.33  = 122.33
    But looking on the FM/CO commitment  documents we see different values , less than Order Price:
    it calculates as following:
    1. Basic Price + MWST ( 116.5)
    2. Freight cost ( without MWST)   ( 5 )
    toal 121.5  instead of 122.33 as in the PO
    Please advise where is the problem
    Thanks,
    Moshe

    Hi Peter,
    You may try to run RKANBU01 report and afterwards RKACOR04 report. I'd suggest to do it in test system first. You may look at note 152571 for further information.
    Regards,
    Eli

Maybe you are looking for