Purchase Order O/P Proposal

Hi I need to propose o/p for
Doc Type/Pur Org/Pur Grp/Vendor/Material Combination...
Since Material is in Line Item level the value is not getting in KOMPBEA-MATNR and in the determination analysis it says ACCESS NOT MADE(Initialized Field)...
How can I achieve this ie proposing O/P only for certain materials....
Thanks for your help...
Larry

Hi,
The material will get populated in the communication structure..
Check the code in the FM KOMPBEA_FILL ..This is where the structure KOMPBEA is getting populated..
Thanks,
Naren

Similar Messages

EDI Output not proposed in purchase order

Hi,
Trying to setup an EDI output to the purchase order and the new output is not appearing in the purchase order automatically. Strange thing is the output analysis shows the condition record is found and says "An output proposal created" ! The output appears in the drop down list, able to select it manually and create an idoc.
Did the following steps, but still missing some thing. Please help.
- Created new EDI condition type and assigned std SAP EDI processing routine.
- Assigned output type to PO output schema with manual only unchecked.
- Maintained condition record in MN05.
- Access sequence and access are fine.
Thanks in advance.
Regards,
Krishna.

Hi
Please create the condition record using MN04, instead of MN05
Thanks & regards
kishore

ME28- purchase order is proposed althoght items are deleted

hi
i have the following problem:
A purchase order in our production system is proposed again for release after all items were deleted.
I want to know why its happend and a way to resolve this problem
Thanks in advance for your help
Enzo
Message was edited by:
        enzo francescoli

thanks for your soon answer.
I dont understand what you are proposing me. What i want to know because the PO continues appearing to be released if the same one were deleted.
Some of this PO before being deleted, they were released, but know still apearing.
thanks for your help, and if you can explain to me with more datail i will thank for it.
Best regards
Enzo
Message was edited by:
        enzo francescoli
Message was edited by:
        enzo francescoli

Purchase order advance payment

Hi Friends,
Below is five requirement from my client regarding down payment and down payment request.
A) While posting down payment or down payment request Purchase order should require entry.
B) System should allowed to put purchase order for the same vendor against we posting advance payment or raising payment request.
C) If 100% advance has already paid against any purchase order, system should not allow to post any further advance against that purchase order.
D) If the 100% GRN has been done against any purchase order system should not allow to post any further advance against that purchaser order.
E) While paying advance system should consider the GRN or advance payment done against the purchase order, and system should allow the pay advance or raise the advance request less the value of advance or GRN value already done.
Your valuable input is highly appreciated.
Regards,
Ashu

Hi,
whatever Mr.Ajay has told correct 1 & 2
The 1 and 2 are possible using field status groups. You can make the PO mandatory
The rest are not possible in standard system.
but system will propose while posting down payment r down payment request amount more than PO value warning message has accrued but it will never stop for posting ok
one more solution is with the help of ABAPer we can able to stop - Use Substitution,
Mr. Ajay below mentioned Option for EHP4 is also available for in this ME2DP also never stop - more than PO value down payment r down payment request
Its a matter of discipline... however, explore the new feature of PO advance payment in EHP4, Tcode ME2DP. May be you get few answers there
Mahesh

Purchase Order Output Message

Hello all,
in a purchase orderI will send out IDOC's. After creating the purchase order a proposal for an output type had been made (checked in analysis, the condition record has been found, but no proposal had been made in the purchase order. After saving the PO there is no record in NAST.
Has somebody an idea?
Regards
Norbert

hi
You need to do some configuration for this.
u2022 Goto NACE .
u2022 Select EF and click on OUTPUT TYPES.
u2022 Then select Output Type NEU and click on processing routines .
u2022 In that you have to add a new entry - medium 5 .
u2022 Then you need to assign a program, form routine and form.
u2022 You can use the standard program i.e. SAPFM06P, FORM routine is always ENTRY_NEU and standard MEDRUCK.
u2022 Then in PARTNER FUNCTION you need to add a new entry : medium - 5 and function - VN .
u2022 For subject of the mail goto Mail Title and Texts. In title give PO No. &EKKO-EBELN& .
u2022 Under General data -> Replacement of text symbols give programm as SAPMM06E and Form Routine as TEXT_SYMBOL_REPLACE .
u2022 Now the subject will be PO No. 1800004202.
u2022 You need to maintain your email id in tcode SU01 and also the vendor's email id.
u2022 Now while creating a new purchase order , change the medium to External Send .
u2022 Then goto Communication Method and select CS01 . ALSO make sure that the Cover Page Text has value PO No. &EKKO-EBELN& .
u2022 Goto tcode ME9F .
u2022 Execute.
u2022 Select the checkbox and click on Output Message.
u2022 You will get a message MAII 00000000000001 generated .
u2022 Use note no 191470
VB

Purchase order vs planned order vs process order vs production order

Hi,
Kinldy explain difference between the Purchase order, planned order, process order and production order?
Thanks & Regards
Ravi kumar

Hi Ravi,
In simple terms:
planned order - A procurement proposal generated by the system to meet a need, this can then be converted to a production / process order (for internal procurement) or into a purchase reqn & in-turn to Purchase order (for external procurement)
Purchase order - A firmed procurement proposal which is sent to your vendor (external procurement) to supply the items as per your order
process order - A firmed procurment proposal which is used for in-house procurement, this is used in process industries eg: chemicals, oil & gas etc
production order - A firmed procurment proposal which is used for in-house procurement, this is used in discrete production industries
Based on the above am quite sure you should be able to figure out the differenced. If any doubts revert.
Regards,
Vivek

Storage location missing in purchase order

Hi all, I'm struggling to find why the storage location is not copied from purchase requisition to purchase order using ME21n.
Further this happens only for one buyer, the same PR's if converted in PO by other buyers, move correctly storage locations to PO.
Only for one buyer the storage location comes up blank and he has to populate manually the field.
I've checked his SAP profile and it's perfectly the same of all other buyers. Also he hasn't any particular personal settings in his ME21n.
Apparently there aren't reason why it should happen but it does.
Also searching on the web I haven't found any documentation or any other SAPer with the same issue
Can someone give me some suggestion?
thanks
Luca

There are 3 reasons for this issue...
1. Authorization
You have said that, all authorizations are same for this buyer compare with other.
2. Personal settings in me21n.
You have also said that there are no issues with the personal settings..
3. User parameter..
Check user parameter from su01 tcode. Is it showing same as other users..
Also check again the personal settings, is there tick the option "Always propose" for storage location in me21n..

Is there any method to stop rescheduling of the PO Need By date from ATP if there is any holiday specified in shipping calender. The requirement is to update the schedule ship date on Sales Order but the lead time of Purchase Order should not increase

We are currently not able to manage schedule ship date proposed by ATP when our warehouse is closed. For example , we would like that ATP doesn't propose any schedule ship date for the first of May , which is a non working day in France. The constraint is that we don't want our purchase need by date to be impacted by the process.
I tried to closed one day in FR1 calendar and, after testing with order management, it appears that ATP didn't propose the closed day, so that's fine, but, our purchase order lead time was increased of 1 day and this is not what we expected.
Can you help us to find the right process.
Thanks

Hi Sandeep,
when we try to Rescheduled out the PO and the request is errored out the with the error:-
Start of log messages from FND_FILE
reschedule fails
old date in planner workbench: 19-MAY-11
new date: 07-JUN-11
header: 417474
line: 605652
po number: 2049031859
shipment no: 1
The need by date/promised date in the source instance is not the same as the need by date/promised date in the destination instance.
In the source instance,
The need by date is 19-MAY-11, and the promised date is 19-MAY-11
End of log messages from FND_FILE
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Availability check in Enjoy Purchase Order & Requisition

Hi Experts,
The availability check is used in 4.7E also but what is difference in Ecc 6.0 or new functionality added
Can any one plz let me know
Regards
Pratap

Below is capture from sap release documentation :
Availability Check in Enjoy Purchase Order and Requisition
(Changed)
Use
As of SAP ECC 6.0, SAP_APPL 600, display and checking of availability are invokable separately in the
Enjoy purchase order and requisition in line with the system behavior on the Sales side.
You invoke the display and checking of availability in the Enjoy purchase order (transaction code
ME21N) and the Enjoy purchase requisition (transaction code ME51N) as follows:
- To display the availability overview, choose Environment -> Availability
- To check availability, choose the Check Availability icon.
13.6.16.3 System Behavior After Availability Check for an Item (Changed)
Use
If you carry out the availability check for an item of a stock transport order, hitherto the system adopted
confirmations as per the desired date/time only.
SAP AG 30
______________________________________________________S_A_P_-S_y_s_te_m_
As of SAP ECC 6.0, SAP_APPL 600, you can define in Customizing how the system reacts if the desired
quantity cannot be confirmed for the desired date/time.
You have a choice of two settings:
- Confirmation as per desired date/time
This is the standard setting and corresponds to previous system behavior.
- Delivery proposal
- Full confirmation
Effects on Customizing
You make the settings in the Rule for Adoption of ATP Results in Purchasing field in Customizing for
Purchasing under Purchase Order -> Set Up Stock Transport Order -> Assign Delivery Type and
Checking Rule.

Budget Exceed Error during creating of Purchase order in reference to PR

Hi,
I am getting the subject error (Budget Exceed Error) every time when I want to create a purchase order related to purchase requisition of my project.
Issue is that after release the project when the purchase requisition has created for non stock item under activity I found in transaction CJ31 the assign value has already updated.
Let say my budget is 400 US$, and the purchase requisition has created for 380 US$. Now when I check with CJ31I found the assigned value is 380. Now If I create a purchase order it throws an error that budget exceed.
The tolerance limits are following:
SA     ZSA01     Budget Profile Overall AVAC     ++     1     90,00
SA     ZSA01     Budget Profile Overall AVAC     ++     3     100,00
SA     ZSA01     Budget Profile Overall AVAC     01     1     90,00
SA     ZSA01     Budget Profile Overall AVAC     01     3     100,00
Please advice what will be the proposed solution for the above issue.
Thanks in advance.
With Regards,

Your budget is 400$ and PR value is 380$ but you have not mentiond what is the tax value ?
when u r creating PO at that time system will check the budget against PO value considering taxes also.
eg. 380$+tax value.
after considering taxes your total PO value imay be getting updated more that 400$.
Explre you error by clicking on error information you get the exact diffrence in budget and PO value.
Hope this will sove your problem, reply after doing this.

Validity start & end, in Purchase Order with limit

Hi All,
We are using a model of SAP with one type of Purchase Order: we have created a new type of purchase order (ZFOA), that we use for all purchase orders.
Now we want to use ZFOA also for Blanket Purchase Order, instead of the standard type proposed for this scope by SAP (FO).
We have inserted Validity Start & Validiti End as Optional Entry in Customizing.
( IMG - MM - Purchasing - Purchase Ordrer - Define Screen Layout at Document Level).
We have inserted them as Optional Entries, and not as Required Entries, because they are Required only for Blanket Purchase Order. (and we use ZFOA for all ours types of Purchase Order)
So i want to know if it's possible to connect the obligatory requirement of these two entries to:
- ZFOA (type of Purchase Order)
- B (Item category in Purchase Order)
In this way:
1) when i create a PO (ZFOA) without item category B --> Validity date & Validity End are not obligatory fields
2) when i create a PO (ZFOA) with item category B ---> Validity date & Validity End are obligatory !!
Have you got any Solutions??
Best regards
Alba

Thanks very much!
Now i found in MM SAP Manual (SCM 520, Purchasing) a similar example, and it could seem possible:
When creating a standard purchase order with the standard item category, the following field selection key is determined for the Material group field:
Field selection key ME21N (Create/Change Purchase Order transaction):
The Material Group field is an optional field.
Field selection key AKTH(Create activity category):
The Material Group field is an optional field.
Field selection key NBF (purchasing document type NB):
The Material Group field is an optional field.
Field selection key PT0F (item category Standard):
The Material Group field is a mandatory (required-entry) field.
The combination of field selection keys ME21N, AKTH and NBF means that the field is an optional field. Because the Material Group field is defined as a mandatory field in the field selection key PT0F however, this means that the field requires an entry when a purchase order is being created.
I have the same problem for Validity start field, but why if i do all of this things, the field remain not mandatory?
Thanks in advance
Best regards
ALba
Edited by: Alba Battolini on Apr 22, 2009 9:21 AM

Net Price in Purchase Order

Hi,
We have contract with a vendor for a particular material with net price 1,483.59 EUR for 1000 PC. This net price is arrived from the below specified Item level conditions:
Gross Price(PB00) : 1421.61 EUR for 1000 PC
Surcharge(ZESC) : 4.360 %
When the Purchase Order is created for 100 PC(with reference to the above mentioned contract), then the net price picked proposed in the PO is 1,483.60 EUR for 1000 PC.
When the Purchase Order is created for 10 PC(with reference to the above mentioned contract), then the net price picked proposed in the PO is 1,484.00 EUR for 1000 PC.
When the Purchase Order is created for 20 PC(with reference to the above mentioned contract), then the net price picked proposed in the PO is 1,483.50 EUR for 1000 PC.
When the Purchase Order is created for 300 PC(with reference to the above mentioned contract), then the net price picked proposed in the PO is 1,483.57 EUR for 1000 PC.
When the Purchase Order is created for 800 PC(with reference to the above mentioned contract), then the net price picked proposed in the PO is 1,483.60 EUR for 1000 PC.
When the Purchase Order is created for 900 PC(with reference to the above mentioned contract), then the net price picked proposed in the PO is 1,483.59 EUR for 1000 PC.
Why is the net price fluctuating? Is there is any config setting based on which such differences are arising?
Please guide me.
With regards
Krishna

Hi Sanjay,
There is no Scale price specified in the Contract.
With regards
Krishna

Profit Segment not activated during creation of purchase order item

Hello,
While I create a Purchase Order Item, in the account assignment tab, I may fill in at least a cost center or a cost center and an internal order.
If I fill in only a cost center and key the enter buton, the profit segment is activated.
If I fill in the cost center and the Internal Order at the same time and afterwards I key the enter button, the profit segment is not activated. I have to click on the Profit segment button and validate the profit segment manually.
Could you tell me what the problem is?
Thank you in advance
Regards

Hi
That makes sense to me
In any entry you can enter One REAL Object and more than one Stat Object...
SInce you entered Cost Center in Option 1 - You were proposed with PSG and IO as the option
Since you entered Cost center *** REAL IO in Option 2 - The system got what it wanted i.e. One REAL OBJECT.. hence, no more objects are proposed to you... However, you can manually enter PSG or WBS if allowed in your Field Status Group in FI
br, Ajay M

Creation of purchase order in MRP

Hi All,
Is it possible to create purchase order as an output of MRP? If yes, then how?
regards,
Mohit

Hi Mohit,
SAP has not provided such facility of directly creating the Purchase Order in MRP run, intentionally, so as to
1. Provide an Authorization Level over the P.O. creation
2. Provide a chance to change the Planned order or Purchase requizition before PO creation
3. As this is a procurement proposal that is directly linked with the vendor, quantity and Price, it has to be created very carefully.
I hope you got it.
with regards,
gnk

Purchase order message Re-determination after goods issue is posted

We have a requirement to trigger special function message type (which creates a flat file) in a purchase order when goods issue for all items are posted. We have created a requirement routine for message type to check if goods issue is posted for all line items. Goods issue is posted using BAPI which uses transaction MIGO. When goods issue is posted, we want output to be triggered in purchase order. Requirement is working fine but is there any way to trigger output automatically without going to PO?
After goods issue is posted, if we go into purchase order using ME22N then we see output proposed or if we make any changes in PO then output is proposed. This will not happen in real life though.
Any suggestion will be highly appreciated. Thanks.
Sanjay

Hello,
You can create a new output message record in NAST using RV_MESSAGE_UPDATE:
CALL FUNCTION 'RV_MESSAGE_UPDATE'
      EXPORTING
        msg_kappl = 'EF'
        msg_objky = w_objky
      TABLES
        msg_xnast = itab_nast
        msg_ynast = itab_nast_old
      EXCEPTIONS
        no_update = 1
        OTHERS    = 2.
Once the record is created, you may submit the program RSNAST00 to output the message.
Thanks,
Venu

Purchase Order O/P Proposal

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for