Purchase Order Response in Classic Scenario

Hi Experts,
Implementation Scenario- CLASSIC
SRM Server - 5.0
Question-
1) Within Classic Scenario, is it possible for to create Purchase Order Response in SRM for a PO which is already created in backend? This PO is generated by a shopping cart in SRM.
Best Regards,
Amit

Hi Amit,
You can create POR for a PO which is already created in backend, no matter if its created with reference to SC in SRM. This POR would be done by the supplier in SUS scenario.
It possible in both, classic and ECS scenario's.
Regards,
Prashant

Similar Messages

  • Purchase Order Creation, Extended Classic Scenario

    Can someone please explain the different databse tables affected during the creation of a Purchase Order.
    Also, is there a transaction with which we can create PO in Extended classic scenario?

    hi,
    below are the tables effected while creation of PO:
    CRMD_ORDERADM_H
    CRMD_ORDERADM_I
    BBP_PDIGP
    BBP_PDBEI
    BBP_PDISB
    BBP_PDISS
    BBP_PDSDLN
    BBP_PDACC
    BBP_PDTAX
    BBP_PDATT
    BBP_PDORG
    BBP_PDWGT
    BBP_PDDYN
    BBP_PDEXR
    PRCD_ITEM
    PRCD_COND
    PRCD_COND
    BBP_PDDEP
    CRMD_PARTNER
    as far as your second question is concerned normally we will be creating a PO in SRM/EBP in web browser and it will replicate to the backend ERP.
    regards
    IGA

  • Purchase order replication – extended classic scenario using XML proxy via PI

    Hi Experts
    Question:
    In case of extended classic deployment is it possible to use XML proxy to
    transfer SRM purchase orders to ECC? As we know as of SRM 7.01 its via RFC
    whether SRM 7.02 onwards does SAP support XML for ECS too?
    Has
    anyone read about this in any of the SAP forums?
    Background: In our project, client have invested
    heavily on XI and XI monitoring and troubleshooting, integrated to SAP SOLMAN.
    And would like to opt for XML mode of transfer and reuse existing solution.
    This is the main reason we would like to be very clear in our understanding
    before we go back to client.
    We appreciate your time and support.
    Regards
    Prashanth

    Dear Rahul,
    Thanks for you input
    Let me give you an example of the behaviour:
    in PPOMA_BBP TOG assigned to user has : DQ with $1000 and upper percentage 5%.
    User orders a PO  with quantity=1000, price $100;
    No additional tolerances assigned in the PO itself
    User tries to enter confirmation with quantity 1001 (so qty variance converted to currency amount results in $100 over delivery) So the confirmation is under both the 5% and the $1000 limit.
    In that case I donu2019t receive an error message from the SRM, but the error message u201CBackend Purchase Order quantity exceeded by 1 EAu201D from ECC still prevents me from posting the Confirmation. And this is the problem I havenu2019t been able to solve so far.
    So I want the TOG tolerance to be used. And I am also happy with the absolute limit always having priority over percentage limit...
    But I am trying to find a way to get rid of the back end message (with assigning a tolerance to the PO itself as the will get rid of the absolute limit see my previous post.)
    Cheers
    Ulrike

  • OPEN purchase order for Extended classic scenario

    Hello All,
    I want to is there any way to find out Open PO in SAP SRM
    like ME2* reports in MM
    Can I extract the report via CRMD_ORDERADM* tables?
    Thanks
    Raman

    Hi,
    You can try the foll:
    1st way is to look into the standard tables in the SRM system
    CRMD_ORDERADM_H (Header Data)
    and
    CRMD_ORDERADM_I (Item Data)
    for the Business object type - BUS2201 (Purchase Orders)
    2nd way is using BBP_PD Transaction for the Business object type - BUS2201 (Purchase Orders) (The transaction calls the same tables to fetch the details)
    3rd way using the standard function modules - BBP_PO_GET_DETAIL / BBP_PD_PO_GETLIST ,In the FM "BBP_PD_PO_GETLIST " ,you have the import parameter "I_IV_OPEN",try to use that for reteriveing the list of open Po's.
    BR,
    Disha.
    Do reward points for  useful answers.

  • SRM-SUS - Extended Classic - Purchase Order Response

    Hi folks,
    We are using SRM-SUS in an Extended Classic scenario in SRM 5.0.  When the Vendor creates a Purchase Order Response (POR) we want the Requisitioner of the Shopping Cart (not the Purchaser from the Purchase Order) to process the POR in EBP. 
    We will add the transaction Process Purchase Reponse to the Requisitioner role.  We want to ensure that the Requisitioner can only see PORs related to Purchase Orders created from the Requisitioner's individual Shopping Carts.
    Has anybody any suggestions and/or see obstacles in our way?
    Cheers,
    Pat

    Hi Pat,
    This is certainly not standard. I see the following challenges:
    a. From the system perspective, your Shoppers will need to be assigned to purchasing group(s) in Org Structure to see the related PORs. That's very unusual, and consequences can be unpredictable.
    b. From the internal controls / business process / security perspective, you may be creating some SOD (segregation of duties) issues.
    IMHO, your business requirement needs to be re-visited. My two cents...
    Cheers,
    Serguei

  • External number range for purchase order response?

    Hi all,
    is it possible to use an external number range when creating purchase order responses (BUS2209, PCO, POR) manually?
    If I transfer the POR from an external system like SUS via XML, can I use an external number range?
    I'm using SRM 4.0 (EBP 5.0) in standalone scenario with Business Connector 4.7 as XML interface.
    Any help is appreciated,
    Karsten

    Hi
    No need to maintian Internal number range.. Yes you need to use an external number range
    Only the PO, RQ & RS are sync and therefore must correspond with the R/3 number ranges.
    The rest, Shop Cart (SC), Local PO (EBP), Confirmation, Invoice, Bid Inv and Bid, aren't synced and can be assigned to any number range. (FYI- using ECS)
    Re: Extended Classic - Purchase Order Number Ranges
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_srm50/helpdata/en/87/7cc73cee4fb55be10000000a114084/frameset.htm
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_srm50/helpdata/en/6d/0f343e47fd6b2ee10000000a114084/frameset.htm
    Re: Number range config
    Re: config for Number Ranges ? :-(
    Re: PO Creation with external PO number
    Purchase Order Response BUS2232
    PO number range Issue
    Re: Defining the number range
    Regards
    - Atul

  • EBP-SUS - Purchase Order Response (POR) with attachments

    Hi,
       I am working on EBP-SUS scenario with EBP in Extended classic scenario.
       I have couple of questions regarding Purchase Order Response in SUS with attachments. I appreciate your response to these questions.
      1. From SUS, when the Supplier responds to a PO with attachment, does the attachment get copied over to SRM PO?
      2. If so, in case of extended classic scenario, does the attachment get sent to MM?
    Thanks,
    Surendra

    Khan,
      Thanks for your reply.
      So, in case of EBP-SUS scenario, if the supplier sends attachment, the attachment gets copied over to PO when the POResponse is copied over? I tried this scenario and the attachment is appearing on PO Response record. However, does not seem to get copied over to PO when the "Copy" button was pressed. Am I missing any configuration?
    Thanks,
    Surendra

  • SRM 7.0 Purchase Order Response always in status "In process" after confirm

    Hello experts,
    this problem is similar to the thread [SRM-SUS Purchase Order Response always "In Status"; which has been not finally responded.
    My problem exists in an environment without SUS.
    When a buyer confirms a PO response (POR) without any change, the system generates a new PO response with status "In process".  This new POR has also to be confirmed or rejected but the system generates again a new PO response with status "In process".
    So we have a very nice loop for the purchaser without escape!
    We are on SRM 7.0 SP07. The other thread mentioned that SAP will create some OSS notes, but I found nothing about this problem.
    Any ideas?
    Regards
    Joe

    Hi Gurus.
    I want to share my experience with this case.
    We have the same scenario, Confirm PO, the result is PO confirmed, but we receive a response from ECC and this Confirmed PO changes its status to "In Process" / "En Tratamiento".
    The new relevant information is that we added 2 new fields to the item PO, these fields are filled ok and sent to ECC.
    In a first time these new fields were lost due to the response from ECC. To avoid this situation I implemented the BADI BBP_DOC_CHANGE_BADI for BUS2230, and method BBP_SUSPO_CHANGE to copy from the BBP_PDISC (Object BUS2230) rows the values to the new rows in the same table BBP_PDISC (Object BUS2201).
    With this change the new documents are confirmed directly and not changed to "In Process"/ "En tratamiento".
    That was my experience, now I have a question...
    In the correct business process for SAP SRM SUS  when you confirm full a PO...
    * this will be blocked or no?
    * Can be modified the confirmed items?
    * This depends of customizing?

  • SRM Purchase Order Response

    Hi Friends,
    I am working on a scenario where I am sending Local PO from SRM Srever(EBP) to Vendor R/3 through XI. In Vendor system I am creating Sales Order. Now I want to send Purchase Order Response to SRM Server, which should be automatically inserted in the SRM.
    I am sending ORDRSP Idoc from Vendor R/3 to XI Server. This Idoc is Received Successfully in XI. I am mapping this Idoc to PurchaseOrderConfirmation_In Interface. This XML msg.is then sent to SRM using XI Receiver Adapter communication channel. This msg is received in SRM, but with error as follows:-
    <b>   <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes" ?>
    - <!--
    Call Inbound Proxy
      -->
    - <SAP:Error xmlns:SAP="http://sap.com/xi/XI/Message/30" xmlns:SOAP="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/" SOAP:mustUnderstand="">
      <SAP:Category>XIProxy</SAP:Category>
      <SAP:Code area="ABAP">PARSE_APPLICATION_DATA</SAP:Code>
      <SAP:P1 />
      <SAP:P2 />
      <SAP:P3 />
      <SAP:P4 />
      <SAP:AdditionalText />
      <SAP:ApplicationFaultMessage namespace="" />
      <SAP:Stack>Error during XML => ABAP conversion (; error ID: ; ( )) PARSE_APPLICATION_DATA Error during XML => ABAP conversion (Request Message; error ID: CX_ST_DESERIALIZATION_ERROR; (/1SAI/TXS00000000000000000004 XML Bytepos.: 902 XML Path: nr1:PurchaseOrderConfirmation(1)PurchaseOrder(1)Item(6)ActionCode(3) Error Text: Data loss occurred when converting 0010000274nfotech Kernel ErrorId: CONVT_DATA_LOSS)) Error during XML => ABAP conversion (Request Message; error ID: CX_ST_DESERIALIZATION_ERROR; (/1SAI/TXS00000000000000000004 XML Bytepos.: 902 XML Path: nr1:PurchaseOrderConfirmation(1)PurchaseOrder(1)Item(6)ActionCode(3) Error Text: Data loss occurred when converting 0010000274nfotech Kernel ErrorId: CONVT_DATA_LOSS)) An error occurred when deserializing in the simple transformation program /1SAI/TXS00000000000000000004 Data loss occurred when converting 0010000274nfotech</SAP:Stack>
      <SAP:Retry>M</SAP:Retry>
      </SAP:Error></b>
    Here out of <b>0010000274</b>, 001 is the Action code  at Item level which is mapped with E1EDP01-> Action, and 274 is the Sales Order No. (Seller Id) which is mapped with E1EDK01-> BELNR.
    Can any one please suggest me some solution to come out of this.
    Thanking you in Advance.
    Waiting for your valuable Reply............
    Regards,
    Nitin Sawant

    Dear Poster,
    As no response has been provided to the thread in some time I must assume the issue is resolved, if the question is still valid please create a new thread rephrasing the query and providing as much data as possible to promote response from the community.
    Best Regards,
    SDN SRM Moderation Team

  • Process button in purchase order response SUS not present

    Hi all.
    We have SRM 7 and ECC 6.4. Scenario MM-SUS Purchase Order Response.
    We can transfer purchase orders from MM to SUS. Purchase Order SUS are generate correctly In SUS system.
    However. When a Vendor user enters in the SUS system  to create the POR, we can not create it  because the Process button is not present.
    The user was create by process of Creating Buyer Data (BBP_SUS_BP_ADM) and  rols SAP_EC_SUS_BIDDER and SAP_EC_SUS_ORDER_PROCESSOR in trx SU01
    I appreciate a tip to solve this issue.
    Regards
    Raul.

    Hi,
    You can do what Sam has suggested in vendor master too so that everytime a PO for that vendor is issued, you do not have to manually maintain these settings in the PO.
    Regards,
    Nikhil

  • Purchase Order Response BUS2232

    We are using SRM-SUS and I am looking to create a Purchase Order Response )aka PO Confirmation) from a SUS supplier to the original PO.
    But I cannot see where in the Supplier users access this document is created.
    The documentation discusses setting up the number range (and transaction type) for this doc, but it isnt mentioned in the help.
    Furthermore the document search allows you to search for all other docs BUT PO Response.
    The only processing a supplier is allowed to do is to create a Confirmation - which seems like a receipt. that doesnt seem correct and wont work in our Extd Class scenario anyway.
    Is PO Response active in SRM-SUS using SRM 4.0?
    If so, where does a supplier start creating it?
    S

    I am a fool.
    I simply needed to set PO RESPONSE required as a follow-on document in the SRM PO that goes into SUS.
    Its NOT a configuration issue in SUS, its a data issue in SRM.
    S

  • Purchase Order Response to being created automatically in SRM

    We have a scenario where we trigger,from portal, in R/3 to send Orders02 to XI,XI maps Orders02 to Purchase Order to XML, and  sends to a SRM system. We see a Purchase Order being created in SRM system, and ALE AUDIT Idoc is sent to the sender R/3 system sucessfully. Now, when we "confirm" the purchase order in the SRM system, this should automatically trigger a Purchase Order Response from SRM to XI and then from XI to the R/3. This part isn't working for us. Are we missing some configurations the SRM side?
    Does anyone know how to fix this problem?
    Any help is appreciated.
    Thanks.
    Karma

    Hello Jay
    Are you running Rescheduling job - T code V_V2- to confirm the back ordered items?
    Are there any status (incompletion/credit) issues or blocks for these items?

  • SRM Purchase Order Response in SRM 7.0

    In SRM 7.0 is there a transaction where a purchase order response to can be entered manually for purchase order or loaded from a spreadsheet?  Or does a purchase order response always require XI?
    Regards,
    -Paul Trauth

    Hi Paul,
    We have to use the SRM portal for all kind of purchase order processing like creation, updation etc,. Can you be more precise in your question, so then we can answer from our side.
    Thanks,
    Nastera

  • Purchase Order Response in SRM from R/3 through XI

    Hello friends,
    While sending Purchase Order Response from R/3 to SRm through XI Iam getting this error in SXMB_MONI of XI and also in SRM:
    <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes" ?>
    - <!-- Response
    -->
    - <SAP:Error xmlns:SAP="http://sap.com/xi/XI/Message/30" xmlns:SOAP="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/" SOAP:mustUnderstand="">
    <SAP:Category>Application</SAP:Category>
    <SAP:Code area="ABAP">APPLICATION_ERROR</SAP:Code>
    <SAP:P1 />
    <SAP:P2 />
    <SAP:P3 />
    <SAP:P4 />
    <SAP:AdditionalText><?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><nr1:StandardMessageFault xmlns:nr1="http://sap.com/xi/SRM/Basis/Global"><standard><faultText>An error occured within an XI interface: Exception occurredE:BBP_PD:069 -Product data could not be intepreted E:BS:013 -System status INCM is active (Purchase Order Response 1000000037) Programm: CX_BBP_BD_ERROR===============CP; Include: CX_BBP_BD_ERROR===============CM002; Line: 57</faultText></standard></nr1:StandardMessageFault></SAP:AdditionalText>
    <SAP:ApplicationFaultMessage namespace="http://sap.com/xi/SRM/Basis/Global">StandardMessageFault</SAP:ApplicationFaultMessage>
    <SAP:Stack>The application triggered an exception</SAP:Stack>
    <SAP:Retry>M</SAP:Retry>
    </SAP:Error>
    can anyone please help me out in this...........
    Thanks in Advance...

    Dear Friends,
    I am SAP MM Certified Consultant & did my training for MM Module from Siemens ( Sapient College )& paid 2.5 lac for that and Since then I am working as a SAP MM consultant in an MNC since past 2 years, done 2 implementations  and had a functional experience of 4  years in purchasing .
    Had work for MNC’s only & having good expertise in Domain area .Total Experience 5 years out of that 2 years SAP MM experience .
    Dear all can you tell me what should i do so as to make a successful career in SRM.? How long should i stay in MM and what should I learn besides MM.I have already started working on SRM .
    I wish to do SRM training again from Siemens  but this point of time , I don’t have enough money to do SRM training from Siemens . Could anyone suggest , where I can learn SRM in Bangalore  & get trained in this New thing and do i need some programming knowledge in it.
    Could anybody send me some SRM documentation on my mail id [email protected]
    Thanks in advance.
    Regards,
    Savita Munshi

  • Purchase order response(POR) in SRM

    Hello SRM Experts,
    We would like to implement Purchase order response(POR) functionality of SRM 5.0. The client requirement is to set POR flag at PO item level, expect POR from the vendor and no GR/IV should be allowed either in SRM or ECC until POR is provided by the vendor.
    We have the following questions.
    1. If POR flag is set, does it stop GR/IV either in SRM or ECC?
    2. When POR is posted in SRM does POR flag is re-set in SRM?
    3. When POR is created in SRM, does it create any follow-on docs in ECC.
    Looking forward to hear from you all soon.
    Regards,
    Sasikala

    Hi Sasikala.
    Referring to your questions:
    PO Response is just an acknowledgement document by the vendor to state that he is in agreement with the conditions set in the Purchase Order.
    1) No GR/IV will not be stopped in SRM or ECC. If the client wants it that ways then I believe custom code needs to be written.
    2) No...reason being you can create as many PO Responses as want for a given PO...the latest will be active and all the responses created before that are obsolete.
    3) No follow on documents are created in ECC while creation of PO Response as after the PO Response changes are accepted in PO, only then the PO is replicated to ECC again with change version.
    Regards,
    Abhilash

Maybe you are looking for

  • Does SAP support open tender process for Vendor selection

    Hi all, Does SAP Support Open tendering process for Vendor Selection. I men in my clients scenario. For vendor selection process for any material starts with advertisement of tender  in newspaper. Vendor replies back with his quotation. After receivi

  • Radio buttons are disabled in Custom Infotyope

    Hi All,   I have created a custom infotype for rating.This infotype is having 5 radiobutton fields. In the field attributes i marked this as an input field.But if go in PA30(create) these radiobuttons are disabled.I am not able to make an input. Than

  • Quit safari is light gray rather than black what did I do

    I clicked on something??? my quit safari is light gray rather than black - what did I do?  it was on a macbook pro Help

  • Battery Percentage Error

    My iPhone 4S battery drops suddenly within a sec.  It can drop from 40% to 29%, 30% to 14%....I am using the original adaptor to charge my battery.  Just an hour ago when I reached home the battery is 30% and I didn't use it afterwards.  My phone was

  • Running Arch from a live USB with persistence, on an intel Atom tablet

    Hello, I may have bitten off more than I can chew here. I am not a noob to linux, but I am a noob to Arch. I have found a few resources around but none of them quite match with what I want to do, and as such I don't want to overcomplicate what I'm do