Pure i20 compatibility

Having upgraded to ios5 my iPhone 4 doesn't. Seem to work with my pure i20 iPod dock . Any advice please.

Hey Havana,
Just wondered if you've found a solution to the Pure I20 issue with IOS 5?
I've recently purchased the dock but wont be able to use it until christmas - any help would be really appreciated.
Rob

Similar Messages

Compatability with Kaspersky PURE

I recently installed Kaspersky PURE and have issues with web sites fully loading or working correctly on Mozilla. Things work fine on Internet Explorer, but not Firefox, which is what I prefer. Please help...thank you.

I had the same problem when Firefox 5 was out (Password Manager Autofill Plugin not compatible).
Installing Standalone Password Manager only sort of fixed the issue, as it was in trial mode (my license is for PURE) and didn't import the DB from old version.
Doing as it says [http://support.kaspersky.com/faq/?qid=208284589 here] fixed the issue (ofc, the fix came about 2 weeks after official release of Firefox 5).
But here we go again, now that Firefox 6 is out. I already opened a request w/ Kaspersky Tech Support, my guesstimate is in about 3 weeks we'll have a patch for PM, so just be patient and don't try too many things to "fix" it, it won't work until new patch is out.
Edit: do '''NOT''' install stand-alone Password Manager, if it's the same as with FF5, you will have it as trial mode and you won't be able to import the DB.

Nokia Pure View 808 Headset compatibility issues

Hi,
I recently bought a headset from Philips (Citiscape Downtown SHL 5605BK to be exact) which says on it's box that it is compatible with all Nokia phones as a headset. However when I connect it to my Pure View 808 it says that it is not supported. What should I do? How can I make my phone support my headset?
The specs of the headset are as listed:
Frequency range: 18-22000 Hz
Sensitivity: 102dB
Impedance: 32 Ohm
Driver: 40mm

@Aunvre
Got a suspicion that Philips (http://www.philips-shop.co.uk/store/catalog/headphones/headband/downtown-on-ear-brown/productdetail/... mean that their headset compatible with newer Nokia Lumia devices wired to AHJ standard rather than Nokia 3.5 mm TRRS (stereo-plus-mic) sockets. You may need to use adaptor such as this http://www.meelec.com/MEElectronic_TRRS_Adapter_for_P_Version_Headphones_p/adptr-trrs-35.htm
Happy to have helped forum in a small way with a Support Ratio = 37.0

How to set Compatibility Mode for a single site in ie10

This question was originally posted on the Answers forum -
http://answers.microsoft.com/en-us/ie/forum/ie10-windows_7/how-to-set-compatibility-mode-for-a-single-site-in/187152e3-142a-4d96-8d1b-af82ef571eec
I am having problem with getting ie10 to set ie9 compatibility for a single site (sharepoint.contoso.com).
When I add this website in Compatibility View Settings (Alt > Tools > Compatibility View Settings > 'Add this Website') it adds the domain 'contoso.com' and not the individual website (sharepoint.contoso.com).
This cause other sites (www.contoso.com) to be configured to use compatibility mode. Because this is a separate site (different web server) to the site sharepoint.contoso.com (sharepoint 2010 server) we need different compatibility settings.
Using a different example to explain the issue -
Microsoft has three websites that are different websites created by different developers written in different programming languages and they only work with certain browsers.
microsoft.com (Website1 created by Developer1) - compatible with ie8/ie9/ie10
msdn.microsoft.com (Website2 created by Developer2) - compatible with ie8/ie9
technet.microsoft.com (Website3 website created by Developer3) - compatible only with ie10
The only thing the three website share is the URL contains 'microsoft.com'.
Marking 'msdn.microsoft.com' to run in compatibility mode affects the other 2 websites - mainly technet.microsoft.com which will not work now since it only runs in pure ie10 mode.
Should you be able to add an individual site to the compatibility list instead of all sites that have .microsoft.com in the URL? Am I missing a simple setting in the ie10?
As a workaround I am using the F12 Developer Tools to set the Browser Mode which temporary sets the compatibility mode. However this is not a nice solution to the end users at our organisation.

problem is not solved for non corporate environments...
You could start your own thread. Then if you got that answer and it was marked Answered you would have the ability to unmark it. The OP of this one seems satisfied. Also note that this is TechNet. Consumers can get help on Answers
forums.
Robert Aldwinckle
Oh! I wrote it wrong: I should have said: This is not solved for NON-AD environments. No demands what so ever to use Window 7/8 professional in a small corporation or on a big corporation with Island of smaller departments for example offshore.
The problem is that the thread is not "Answered" by the OP, its is marked answered by a moderator (and same moderator that did the answer) so no way of telling if the OP is satisfied.
But you are right in the fact that I am almost kidnapping the thread. But a complete answer would benefit all in this case I would presume.
Regards
/Aldus

Java C# Encryption compatibility

Would anyone happen to know or could point me to a place where I can find out the compatibility in the crypto libraries between C#/.NET and the various Java providers including JCE, BouncyCastle and Cryptix. I would need to exchange things like session keys and PBE encrypted messages. Maybe also some MD5 hashes. Now I assume that if I use the same exact algorigthm in theory the byte arrays should be identical, however in practice I'm afraid I'm going to run into issues like different algorithm implementations as well as other things such as byte order differences, String locale differences and maybe even things like Base64 encoding. So I guess what I would really love to read or see would be somekind of a review of compatibility in encrytion and a rough guide for the major issues in sharing encrypted information between Java and C#.
Thnx for any info.
-Igor

I know what you're looking for, and I haven't found it either.
The closest thing might be this article comparing the crypto
support in .Net to Java:
http://www.onjava.com/lpt/a/4415
If you end up running into compatibility issues, you might want
to consider using Bouncy Castle's C# crypto port on your .Net
side: http://www.bouncycastle.org/csharp/index.html
Using BC on both the Java and C# side could eliminate any weird
implementation problems with the .Net libraries.
Be aware that if you go down the pure .Net route, you may end up having
to use the MS CAPICOM library from C# since it hasnt all been ported over
yet. Here's an article about how to do it: http://msdn.microsoft.com/security/securecode/dotnet/default.aspx?pull=/library/en-us/dncapi/html/netcryptoapi.asp

I can't search a song or an artist. i get an error R6025/pure virtual function call. then itunes stops working. PLEASE HELP

I can't search a song or an artist without getting an error R6025 - pure virtual function call. Then itunes stops working. How do I fix it? PLEASE HELP

I have had numerous issues with Itunes 64 bit 11.1.38 (and other previous versions) locking up and crashing upon start with "Itunes has stopped working" or "R6027 pure virtual function call". I have researched the answers around the forums as well as having tried some extensive and repetitious troubleshooting myself and thought I'd list them here... in order of troubleshooting...
1. Install all Windows updates and reboot. This seems to clear issues from time-to-time... I suspect Itunes expects the latest-and-greatest as far as Windows is concerned.. see if this clears your issue.
2. Uninstall all Itunes and Apple products & reboot, remove their directories, remove lingering Itunes registry entries, reboot again, reinstall using "RUN AS ADMINISTRATOR" to install the Itunes executable. See if this allows Itunes to stabilize. Pelase be sure to use the following guide from Apple as far as removing the apps and directories are concerned...
http://support.apple.com/kb/ht1923
3. Remove the contents of the "iphone photo cache" (or other related product photo cache) directory.
4. Try editing the shortcut properties and configure the shortcut (for all users) to run as Administrator.
5. Try editing the shortcut and configure it to run in Compatibility Mode for Windows 7 (for all users).
6. a.Try using MSCONFIG to locate a potential conflicting application or service using the following...
http://support.apple.com/kb/ht2292
or
6. b. Remove the last recent software application(s) you may have installed... in my case removing GREENSHOT http://getgreenshot.org/ stopped my Itunes from crashing on startup and it stabilized after
driving my nuts for weeks.
Message was edited by: DaCheeze

How to set IE compatibility view programmatically in Browser Helper Object?

Goal: In IE11, I need to set "IE=EmulateIE7" compatibility view for particular websites.
Adding an HTML meta header or a HTTP response header is not an option as we do not control the websites. Configuring IE (Tools > Compatibility View settings...) is not fine-grained enough as it truncates the website URL to the second and top level domains.
My approach is to achieve the same but more fine-grained with the help of a Browser Helper Object (BHO). Is this possible at all?
I created a C# Hello World BHO according to an online sample. It works in IE9. I haven't tested it in IE11 yet. Now I need to add some flesh to the bone. My idea is to register with the appropriate WebBrowser event, check the URL being retrieved, and then
set a WebBrowser property to turn on compatibility view if necessary.
Is this feasible?
Which WebBrowser event would that be? DownloadBegin or DownloadEnd? Other?
pure guess: WebBrowser.PutProperty("X-UA-Compatible", "IE=EmulateIE7")?
Any ideas to cut down my trial-and-error space? Thanks a lot!
PS: I (prematurely?) posted this question last night on stackoverflow.com.

The compatibility list is more about developer and user preference and Microsoft tends to not provide API to override preferences.
If the user accepts launching a separate window to render the content in some alternative browser (pretty much like viewing source in Notepad) you can modify the browser emulation registry value before launching your own webbrowser control based application.
Visual C++ MVP

Need to add a website via compatibility view but can't figure out how.

I try to go to a website that tells me that I need IE 6.0 or greater. I have a brand new Excite Pure AT15-A/16GB. I'm assuming this has an up-to-date IE, but I still can't view the site. I tried to go to the gear icon when I open google to access compatibility view, but it's not there. Any other suggestions?

The website doesn't require IE. Saying version is too low means it lacks some feature. Try other browsers such as firefox, chrome or Opera.

POF compatibility across Coherence versions

Dear all,
I am very interested in using POF serialization to synchronize two Coherence grids via JMS for its performance and because the OO<->bytes serialization is already paid exchanging data between the business logic and the backing map.
Before going in this direction, I would like to better understand POF characteristics (in addition to the wiki docs*) :
- Will there be a POF compatibility between Coherence 3.5 and the forthcoming versions ?
For example, will a POF written with Coherence 3.5.3 will be understandable by Coherence 3.6 ? 4.x ? Will the reverse be also true ? Will a POF written by Coherence 4.x be understandable by Coherence 3.5.3 ?
- Is there a plan to make POF independant of Coherence ? Will it be possible to use POF in a pure weblogic-or-tomcat web app ? Will there be a downloadeable pof library with the associated licensing ?
Thanks,
Cyrille
* http://coherence.oracle.com/display/COH35UG/The+Portable+Object+Format

cyrille.leclerc wrote:
Thanks for the insight Robert,
Having such annotations in September would be very interesting for us.
In addition to the classical *@Entity*, *@Basic*, *@Id*, *@IdClass*, I would like very much to have :
* *@OneToMany* and *@OneToMany* to easily navigate in my partitionned entities (relations only possible between sub entities of the "root" entities that are put in the grid )
* *@Version* for optimistic locking
* AccessType field/getter in case I must do tricky things during my serialization
* *@Index* to index fields declaratively
* My super dream would be to have a *@Lob* annotation to tell the grid to store my very big fields with coherence transparently offloading this voluminous data outside of the heap memory and the RAM. I currently look at using a nio-file-manager style "lob-cache" just next to my "entity-cache" with colocalisation/keyassociation between the two.
That was my whishlist :-)
thanks again,
Cyrille
Cyrille Le Clerc
[email protected]
Hi Cyrille,
my annotations do not work like JPA. The annotation processor which processes it just generates PofSerializers for them.
Any kind of navigation-like code is totally orthogonal to them. Practically you can write your navigation code into your get methods (or implement them in utility methods and call on them from the getters) if you like (I don't usually like such coding style because it introduces the n+1 problem), and annotate your to-be-serialized attributes and the annotation processor takes care of generating PofSerializer implementations during build time.
Obviously, for the .NET/C++ artifacts, some additional customizability needs to be introduced to reproduce such navigation methods you may have, but that is still the future, and I don't see that such a critical feature. I don't really like resource modification code in data class operations. It brings back the days of EJB 1 Entity beans again.
The @Index annotation could be taken care of by another annotation processor which may or may not be aware of my POF Serializer runtime library, although I do see added value in integrating such indexing support into the generator (generate proper extractors leveraging certain features of my attribute serializers)
What you mentioned for AccessType is likely supported by the existing serializer annotations (pre/post serialization/deserialization hooks, getter/direct field access, immutable factory class support for deserialization).
For blob you should also look at nio-memory-manager and partition-aware backing maps (it increases the total NIO memory you can leverage).
Best regards,
Robert

Will a canon Ixus 100 IS be compatable with iMovie? will it be in HD?

Hi I am thinking about buying a Canon Ixus 100 IS camera and use the movie mode to shoot clips to use in imove. Will they be compatable?
The camera records in HD so will they play in High Definition?
Thanks Matt

Des Collins wrote:
Am I likely to see a speed increase in accessing the Airport Disk from the AppleTV/Mini if it were to be 'n' enabled.
Yes
In other words does the fact that other Macs require a 'g' network mean that access speeds for ALL Macs is reduced to the 'lowest' level?
No not the lowest level, but using 802.11g devices on an 802.11n network does reduce the speed of n devices, but not down to g speeds.
From my tests.
Pure 802.11n - 802.11n speeds = 300Mbs
802.11n with b.g - 802.11n speeds = 130Mbs
iFelix

Time Capsule and BT Home Hub compatibility

Hi
I would be very grateful for your help.
I have a BT Home Hub (brand new) connected via ethernet cable to my Time Capsule (gen 4). I get the combination to work together OK (without switching off the BT Home Hub wireless), and I have the option of using the BT Home Hub wireless network too. I notice that the Time Capsule network is much less consistent than the direct BT Home Hub one. I also see that the BT Home Hub seems to have a much better coverage of the rooms in our house thean the Time Capsule network.
Is there some sort of conflict going on here? Should I permanently switch off the wireless router function on the BT Home Hub?
If I do straight speed checks - most of the time they both seem to perform similarly, yet every now and then - perhaps 3x weekly, the Time Capsule one just goes very slow or stops all together.
I was hoping the Time Capsule would give the best possible coverage around the house, so if that issue is not linked to the BT Home Hub compatibility issue, then are there different settings I should be trying on the Time Capsule via Air utility?
For completeness sake I also notice that the hourly back up sometimes fails as my iMac does not find the Time Casule every hour, and sometimes very small updates can take longer thah I would expect. Perhaps this is linked to the above, but perhaps not.
Anyway, I would be most grateful for your advice.
Best wishes,
David

Hmmm.. TC should auto select channel to not interfere with the Home Hub.. but the home hub might also be set to auto.. this means you have auto-auto.. and no controller who dictates the terms. Set fixed wireless channels.. and keep them separated as far as possible from each other. Even using EOP or long ethernet even better to run the TC in some wireless dark area of the house.
In my case I have a Thomson G wireless adsl modem.. and it beats the TC wireless hands down at the other end of the house.. simple fact is, the TC is no wireless power house.. regardless of Apple's so called improvements to the antennas and power output. The design is just not good for wireless.
So for 2.4ghz there are only 3 non-overlapping channels, 1, 6, 11 (13 in UK).. I recommend you set the BT to 1 and the TC to 11 or 13.
Use wireless names in the TC that are short no spaces pure alphanumeric.. and use wpa2 Personal security.
That is about the best you can do.. I like to force 5ghz to a different name.. so I can select it and it is much faster if you are in range.. but 5ghz has poor range.

I have formatted my SSD and hard drive.... I am running a clean install from disk of 8.1 pro. I cannot determine if it is a compatibility

issue or hardware issue. I had run a memory test and scan disk for bad sectors from the bios. As administrator, I enabled automount in diskpart to allow windows to assign a drive name.
From the bios, I can see both drives and only the ssd. I have not pinpointed when the harddisk is unmounted. It is formatted as NTFS. I can hear it unmount either during boot or upon waking from sleep mode. The bios sees no bad sectors nor does windows.
However, when I had the intel compatibility software installed, my hard drive never mounted. I did a restart and inorder for windows to see my hard drive. I disabled the intel software for the 4th gen i7 processor. This problem is happening less often. I do
not think I have solved the problem. Intel or Windows... I think a bit of both.
If there is a software patch, please guide me to it. I am in school and use my laptop ALL the time. I believe it is a compatibility issue. I have attached this from searching intel's site for downloads and windows is up to date.
I am quite concerned because I can hear my harddrive unmount. It is labeled as healthy NTFS partition. I have checked for hidden volumes and done everything I know to do to check the integrity of the hardware as administrator. I have searched microsofts
libraries and forums and have done everything I can find as suggestions.
I have checked for malware, viruses, etc. My only clue this is going to happen is the hard disk spins up and I hear the fan, then I hear it unmount the drive. Of course, after unmounted there are other issues which I have ruled out as the cause of the problem.
Basically, I am experiencing a lack of swap space after my hard drive unmounts.
Any suggestions, are welcome! I would really like to know if this is a known windows issue. I should not have to disable intel's processor software. I paid for the features of the i7 and would like to utilise the processor.

Hi,
According to your descriptioin, I don't think this is system problem, it should be Intel driver problem. It would be contact Intel to confirm this issue whether this is their driver problem.
Roger Lu
TechNet Community Support

Itunes wont open - compatibility error...

hi,
today I had a problem with moving songs from itunes to ipod. have had this issue in the past which was fixed by using ipod updater.
this didnt seem to work so for first time in ages ran the itunes updater. I can no longer open itunes and get the following error.
Quicktime unavailable
itunes requires Windows 2000 or later
Please make sure compatibility mode is disbaled in the compatibility tab of the properties of itunes.exe
well....I tried to do this (I am not massively IT literate!), have tried selecting or deselecting compatibility on this tab....and still wont open....any ideas?
im on windows XP professional.
cheers in advance
mike

hiya!
if I find the mp3 file on my hardrive and move it to ipod manually it still doesnt appear when I disconnect.
that's normal. for the ipod to recognise a song it needs to be transferred to the ipod via itunes rather than dragged and dropped with Windows Explorer. see the note at the end of this article:
iPod: Operating System or iTunes Reports the Disk is Full, But It Does Not Look Full
... try resetting the warnings on your ipod and trying another manual sync:
Resetting iPod warnings
do you get an error message show up after resetting warnings?
love, b

Is there a Data Execution Prevention compatable version of iTunes? I have reinstalled iTunes 10.5 at least 10 times, and after it installs, it will not open because of DEP.

I have tried all the advice I have seen on Apple Support discussion boards for the past 2 days, and nothing works. Disabling DEP is not possible, regardless of what the Windows Support discussions tell you. In the meantime, I have absolutely no access to iTunes, or even the ability to update my iPhone or iPod. The only feasable solution is the possibility of a version of iTunes that is compatable with Data Execution Prevention settings.
In the past 2 days, I have: Removed iTunes and related components from the Control Panel (numerous times) Per the instructions on Apple Service discussions pages, I did it in this order. 1. iTunes 2. QuickTime 3. Apple Software Update 4. Apple Mobile Device Support 5. Bonjour ^. Apple Application Support. After all that, I reinstalled iTunes.
Everything looks fine during installation, with no error messages. At the end, it says everything was successfully installed. However, when the installation tool closes, iTunes will only partially open a window, but will stay blank. Then I get the message that iTunes has stopped working and that Windows has shut it down. Then I get notified that DEP has caused iTunes to shut down.
Can someone please help? Or, is there a DEP compatible version of iTunes?
I would appreciate any help. Thanks!!

Polydorus,
Thank you for your kind reply. During the many times I uninstalled iTunes, and all the other Apple programs, I only used the Uninstall Programs in Windows Control Panel. To make a long story short, I found a solution that works for me, but it is still not a complete soluton.
Here is what I did:
I used Uninstall Program in the Windows Control Panel to uninstall everything IN THIS ORDER
1. iTunes
2. QuickTime
3. Apple Software Update
4. Apple Mobile Device Support
5. Bonjour
6. Apple Application Support
Then I went to C:\Program Files and looked for any iTunes or Apple program listed there and deleted it.
I have 64-bit, so I then went to C:\Program files (x86) and looked for any iTunes, QuickTime, Bonjour or any other file or folder that had Apple or any Apple program in the name and deleted it.
I went to C:\Windows|SysWOW64\Quicktime and C:\Windows\SysWOW64\QuicktimeVR and deleted them
Go back to START, and open the "C" drive. Open the USERS folder. Open the folder with your username. Open the AppData folder. Then double-click on the LOCAL folder to open it. If you see any files or folders there that show any Apple program or file, delete those files or folders. Then go to the REMOTE folder and do the same. If there are any other users on this computer, go to each individual user and do the same thing in each LOCAL and REMOTE folder. Restart your computer.
Go to http://www.apple.com/itunes/download/ This is the page where you will actually download iTunes. Scroll down the page to the section under "Windows Software" that says "64-bit editions of Windows Vista or Windows 7 require the iTunes 64-bit installer". Click on that line to get the installer. It will take you to another download window.
Scroll to the bottom of the page to the message that says "Download for iTunes 10.4.1 for Windows (64-bit) here: iTunes for Windows 64-bit." Click there to get the download.
This is not iTunes 10.5, so you will not have access to "The Cloud", but it is at least functional until Apple actually comes out with a version that will not activate the DEP message. There was no combination of uninstalling and reinstalling, with or without Quicktime, with 10.5 that did not cause problems with Data Execution Prevention problems that I found.
I also used Firefox for the downloading instead of Internet Explorer. It just seemed to function better that way.
I hope this is helpful to someone. It's just what worked for me.

How can I turn on the Compatibility View Option?

In viewing a vendor's online reporting, I noticed that the report's header appears on the right, while the report's content appear on the left, creating a confusing viewing.
The vendor has recommended that I turn on the Compatibility View Option, but I cannot find this option anywhere.
Would someone direct me to the section where I can turn on the Compatibility View Option?
Thank you!

You can try these steps in case of issues with web pages:
You can reload web page(s) and bypass the cache to refresh possibly outdated or corrupted files.
*Hold down the Shift key and left-click the Reload button
*Press "Ctrl + F5" or press "Ctrl + Shift + R" (Windows,Linux)
*Press "Command + Shift + R" (Mac)
Clear the cache and cookies only from websites that cause problems.
"Clear the Cache":
*Firefox/Tools > Options > Advanced > Network > Cached Web Content: "Clear Now"
"Remove Cookies" from sites causing problems:
*Firefox/Tools > Options > Privacy > "Use custom settings for history" > Cookies: "Show Cookies"
Start Firefox in <u>[[Safe Mode|Safe Mode]]</u> to check if one of the extensions (Firefox/Tools > Add-ons > Extensions) or if hardware acceleration is causing the problem.
*Switch to the DEFAULT theme: Firefox/Tools > Add-ons > Appearance
*Do NOT click the Reset button on the Safe Mode start window
*https://support.mozilla.org/kb/Safe+Mode
*https://support.mozilla.org/kb/Troubleshooting+extensions+and+themes

Pure i20 compatibility

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for