Putaway Strategy - Not going to next bin

If I have a Putaway Strategy of Next Empty Bin and my bins have a set capacity of 1.000 KG (Maximum weight of 1.000 KG), then I receive and try to putaway a total of 10.000 KG, the system is allocating the whole 10.000 KG in one bin. Shouldn't it put away in 10 bins? The strange thing is that for the same material in other Plants, the process is fine, SAP splits the quantity correctly among the bins. AND for other materials in current plant it does work fine either.
We double checked the Material Master for the material/current plant against material/other plant (WM1, WM2, and further views). Everything looks the same.
We also double checked the MMaster for current material/plant against other material/current plant and there's no difference at all.
Could anybody help out?
Best Regards,
Rodrigo

The Capacity Check Method is empty, but things are working for other materials, SAP splits the total quantitity according to the weight capacity of 1.000KG for each bin.
I'm wondering if there's another configuration that leads to the same result.
ABs,
Rodrigo

Similar Messages

Putaway strategy based on nearest empty bin

Gurus
In my storage type there are different bins, how is it possible for me to have the system propose a nearest empty bin for a putaway location, nearest empty need not be the next empty bin strategy, what considerations i should take during bin creation, how can this be linked to the sort sequence,need a clean explanation of this issue.

Hi
You can use sort variable function to map nearer to your requirement, called as Cross-line stock putaway.
Cross-Line Stock Putaway
In this function, a sort variable helps the system to search for suitable storage bins. With the sort variable, you can eliminate the problems caused by one-sided loading in the warehouse and optimize the stock putaway process in your warehouse. If the sort variable has not been defined, the system sorts using the storage bin coordinate itself
With the putaway strategies L (next storage bin) and P (storage unit type), you can influence the search for a suitable storage bin with the help of a sort variable. This method can also be set up for storage types with putaway strategies L (Addition to existing stock) or B (Bulk storage), since if the system does not find a bin for adding to existing stock, it will use sort variables to find an empty storage bin.
For more information on this refer
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_47x200/helpdata/en/c6/f844de4afa11d182b90000e829fbfe/frameset.htm
Regards
Ramakrishna

Addn to stock flag for putaway strategy not working

Hi
It seems that the flag Addn to stock for putaway strategy in the storage type 103 configuration is not working fine as the quantities of the same material with the same batch sent to the same stype 103, and destination bin are not being added. So by running stock report in WM we see several lines with partial quantities instead of only one line with the total quantity in place. Do anybody know how can that be solved? Or what can be the route cause of the issue? Is there any OSS known applicable to fix the problem?
Thx for your help
Alba

Hi Guys
Unfortunately I do not think that you will get an answer now. Either your question is not simple or we do not know.
So in the interest of keeping the Forum tidy and easier to surf through could you please close your thread and wither try one of the other forums or try another post. I do not think that mosy people will bother to look this far back anymore.
Sorry I cannot help as I would if I could.
Regards
Frenchy.

Requests that are forwarded to another approver are not going to next stage

We are having an issue with AE 5.2 with Forwarded requests. When requests are forwarded to another approver and this person then approves the requests, they are not going on to the next stage in our workflow. We have the Forward Type option set to 'Any one Approver' for the workflow stage. Have also tried forwarding the requests with both the Forward With No Return and Forward With Return options.
The approver that is receiving these Forwards is not listed as one of the approvers for the role in the request. Is this the issue, are we not using the Forward process correctly, or is this a bug in AE 5.2. (I think we are currently on SP 9 of GRC 5.2.)
Thanks.

Hi Bob,
I am running AE 5.2 but do not use the "forward" feature. For request that require "role approvers" I have set up a seperate initiaor that includes the additional Stage for Role approval.
I have initiators for 1) New User w/ no role approval 2) New User w/ role approval 3) Change User w/ no role approval 4) Change User w/ no role approval
My "no role approvals" go through three stages 1) security initial review 2) Internal Control review 3) Final security provisioning; my "role approvals" go through four stages 1) security initial review 2) Role Approval Stage 3) Internal Control review 3) Final security provisioning
If a request has roles that require approval and some that do not, the request will take the two seperate paths based on the roles defined for each; the provisoning will complete once both paths have completed all stages
This allows us to treat the role approval just like any stage with assigned approvers and if multiple approvers allow for any one approver to complete the stage
This is different from your approach of forwarding for role approval; I define the roles to the initialtors that require role approval, but gives you another perspective of doing it
Jerry Synoga
Ryerson,Inc.
630-758-2021

AE: Escalation E-mail not going to next approver

Hi All
We have a 3 stage approval process APO, BPO and security.
If a request is not approved within 8 hrs at any of the stages then the request is escalated to the next approver.
The problem is this that there is no e-mail notifying the next approver that the request has been escalated. The next approver will however get another e-mail asking the approver to approve the request and this is as it should be. However the escalation e-mail is not going to the next approver.
Please Advise.

Hi guys,
Thanks for the input.
Yes, the background job is definitely running for escalations as well as email reminders. I have checked the job logs and they are running with no errors.
Under the notification on each stage, under escalation, we do have "Other approvers" selected. Any idea's?
The request is escalating to the next stage after the wait period, however the "next approver" does not receive the emails under the "escalation" tab within the stage.
Your assistance is highly appreciated.

Workflow not going to next activity

Hi Experts,
It seems like my Workflow is going into the self loop, i.e instead of proceeding to the next level it is calling first activity againa and adding same approvers.
The systems behaviour is as below
1. Level 1 - Prescript could add approvers successfully
2. Level 1 Approvers received email to approve
3. Level 1 Approver approves the request
4 Workflow is again adding Level 1 approvers again and send emails to the same set of level 1 approvers.
After looking at the logs, it is clear that, the flow is not going to the 'pre-script' of level 2.
Any idea?
Cheers
Yogesh

Thanks Baski,
Yes, It was the xpdl issue. What I tried to do is, I opened the XPDL created in the together 1.1 version in the together 4.1 version. And tried to recttify some errors.
After rectifying errors, the XPDL was looking ok in the viewer,but it seems it had some missing elements.
Somehow I could manage to get the together 1.1 version and created the XPDL again and it stared working fine.
Thanks
Yogesh

Lightroom not going to next photo after deleting a photo

I would have sworn that for a long time (at first) when I'd delete a photo from disk Lightroom would automatically go to the next photo. That's not the case now. I delete a photo, and then lightroom goes to a black screen that says "no photo selected". If I use the right arrow it goes to the very end of the whole collection (which is problematic when you're going through 3000 photos, and then you try to find where you finished). Otherwise, you have to find and click on the next photo to display it. This is a pain. Anyone know how to get it to just go to the next photo automatically upon deleting a photo?
Thanks, Ester

I am deleting it with the Delete button. Then a message pops up saying 'do
you want to permanently delete from disk?' I say "yes" , and it goes to
blank screen saying "no photo selected". I'm not sure a screen shot will
help you since I can't document with keyboard buttons I'm pressing in a
screen shot...
Any thoughts as to how to get it to go to 'Next photo' instead?
Thanks, Ester
On Sun, Oct 5, 2014 at 11:34 AM, John R. Ellis <[email protected]>

Deleted items not going to recycle bin.

Whenever I delete something from my iTunes library, I get the popup asking if I want to move it to the recycle bin or leave the file on the computer, and I always click on the button to move it to the recycle bin.
And it never does. It just leaves everything in the hard drive.
Since I watch a daily vlog as a video podcast, this can add up to some serious hard drive space wasted in short order.
I've drilled down to the folder for that in my iTunes folder, and sure enough there was the last episode I had just removed.
It'll be a major pain to sort through and delete the items I've removed, but not the ones I'm saving, and am wondering if there is a way to fix iTunes to work properly, like it did on my old Mac, rather than having to navigate my way through the iTunes folder every time I don't want to save something I've just played the one time I downloaded it for.

Hello klep:
I have seen this before but, of course, I do not remember the solution.
Try a couple of things:
Run permission repair.
Restart your computer (if you have not already done so).
Trash the finder preference file (com.apple.finder.plist) and restart.
Barry

Putaway Strategy for replenishment of fixed bins - SU destination bin

My client is using ECC 6.0 Retail and using WM.
After creating the TR for the replenishment of the fixed bins according to the bin situtation using LP21, we create TOs using LB11 for article. At the TO creation, the system creates a new Quant and automatically proposes the SU# from the source bin to the destination bin. We allow addition to stock but not mixed SUs. However you can manually overwrite and input the current SU destination bin but this is very time consuming. Is there a way to have this process done automatically?
Thanks Gaetan

Hi Gaetan,
It seems this topic is extremly important recently...e.g.:
Addition to storage unit
I'm not aware of anything in standard SAP that would help you to realize your scenario. (if it is very important maybe it should be indicated to SAP AG. However, in a WH where SU management is active the material flow is realized trough SUs > if warehouse workers add the stock physically from one SU to other SU it means additional work for them physically and therefore in SAP too).
Regards,
Csaba

Captivate 4: text button stopping project, not going to next slide.

When testing a published captivate project...I click the text button that is set to go to the next slide prior to the slide being done (because learners will do this) and the project stops.
I'd prefer to use the buttons (as I believe they are intended).
Thoughts?
Thanks,
James

Hello James,
Can you go to the button properties and check under option-- check the Timing -- for Pause after, set it to 0.1 seconds .
Now republish and verify that if it jumpts to your defined slide or not?
Thanks,
Anjaneai

ITunes podcast file not going to recycle bin after deleted?

After I deleted podcast files from iTunes on my PC running windows XP, sometimes they didn't go to recycle bin but instead stayed in my podcast folder.

I don't think you're doing anything wrong!
I had just deleted to Recycle Bin a whole bunch of podcast this morning, and after I read your post, I checked my PC.
It deleted about 30 and left 3.
Looks buggy to me!

Form not going to next page

I have created a form (with sub-forms on top of sub-forms). They all seem to expand and go onto the second page but it will not create a third page when it reaches that point. Nor can I add yet another subform on a third page. I cannot seem to figure this out after working with it for several hours and reading more posts than I could ever imagine on how to do it. They all recommend I set it the way I have it but it still won't flow. The forms tree begins with a page 1 untitled form which is a flowed form. From there I am using a combination of postioned and flowed forms but they will not go onto a third page no matter what I try to do.

I actually got it squared away. This program is not terribly user friendly but very powerful. I had nested forms and somewhere along the way I nested a flowed form inside of a positioned form thus no page breaking. Thank you very much for your help.

WM and Open storage putaway strategy

Hi,
the following link gives an explanation about Open storage putaway strategy
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_erp2005/helpdata/en/c6/f844694afa11d182b90000e829fbfe/frameset.htm
Strategy C: Open Storage
Use
The system uses this putaway strategy to find the storage bin in an open storage section. Open storage is a type of warehouse organization in which you define a single storage bin for a storage section. The quants in the storage bin can also be in the form of mixed storage.
I think that in this strategy is also possible to define more than a single storage bin for a storage section.....or not?
So why the statement: you define a single storage bin for a storage section.
Best regards

I cannot tell you why it is explained in this way, even the German explanation does not give any hint.
Open storage putaway strategy is the most used in my implementations and I can confirm that you can have hundreds of bins in one storage section.

Requestes are not forwarded to next level after approval

Hi all,
Apps version 11.5.10, Solaris 10
we have modified a user name in apps after that what ever that particular user has approved is not going to next level. Is it not recommended to update a user name?
Hope some one can help me fix the issue
Thanks in advance
uns

Hi Bob,
I am running AE 5.2 but do not use the "forward" feature. For request that require "role approvers" I have set up a seperate initiaor that includes the additional Stage for Role approval.
I have initiators for 1) New User w/ no role approval 2) New User w/ role approval 3) Change User w/ no role approval 4) Change User w/ no role approval
My "no role approvals" go through three stages 1) security initial review 2) Internal Control review 3) Final security provisioning; my "role approvals" go through four stages 1) security initial review 2) Role Approval Stage 3) Internal Control review 3) Final security provisioning
If a request has roles that require approval and some that do not, the request will take the two seperate paths based on the roles defined for each; the provisoning will complete once both paths have completed all stages
This allows us to treat the role approval just like any stage with assigned approvers and if multiple approvers allow for any one approver to complete the stage
This is different from your approach of forwarding for role approval; I define the roles to the initialtors that require role approval, but gives you another perspective of doing it
Jerry Synoga
Ryerson,Inc.
630-758-2021

SAP WM Putaway strategy - Next empty bin

Hello,
I am testing putaway strategy - L - Next empty bin.
I' ve created 902 - Storage type:
Also i've been activated storage type search and storage section search:
Then i've added this data to material master:
And i also defined movement type- 101 for purchase orders:
Also, special for this, i've created the empty bin:
But when i am trying to post goods receipt in MIGO, i am getting the following error:
Storage bin Z02 does not exist (check your entry)
Message no. L9009
Could you please advise - what is wrong - why i can't post the goods receipt in MIGO?
Thank you in advance.

Hello, Jürgen
That's the settings for standard 101 wm mvmt type:
That's setting for my 101 wm mvmt type:
Difference - that i don't want to use dynamic storage bins.
And i still have this error:
Storage bin Z02 902 does not exist (check your entry)
Message no. L9009
Now system defines also storage type, because of i wrote it in the mvmt type, but i still can't understand, why it doesn't find storage bin, according the strategy.
I think, that i 've made all necessary customizing settings and i also have one empty storage bin on this storage type and storage section.

Putaway Strategy - Not going to next bin

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for