Putaway Strategy P - Managing different SU types

Hi gurus,
I'm experiencing the following problem.
Using the putaway strategy Pallet, the system processes different storage unit types and allocates them to the appropriate section, but only the same storage unit types can be placed into a storage bin at one time.
My need is to place at the same time different SU types into a storage bin. Is it possible?
Thank for your help!
Francesca

Hi
The storage unit is compatible with the current block when the 'maximum
storage units' which can be stored in the bin are the same. The
'maximum storage units' depends on the storage unit type of the first
storage unit you put it the bin. If the values of T337B-MAXLE are
different then the system will not allow the placement. This is the
is the standard behaviour.
Field LAGP-MAXLE indicates the maximum number of Storage Units that are
allowed to be placed into a bin and this is set during the first
placement into an empty bin in accordance with the block stucture
definition in transaction OMM4.
This does not mean that it is not possible to place different Storage
Unit Types in to the bin. This is possible but only when the block
structure definition in OMM4 has an identical value for the maximum
number of storage units in the block (T337B-MAXLE). If one has a value
of 20 and the other has a value of 10 then the system correctly issues
error L3 425.
regards,
Ramana

Similar Messages

  • U0093Addn to stocku0094 for putaway strategy u0093 u0093  in storage type not working

    Hi
    It seems that the flag “Addn to stock” for putaway strategy “ “  in the storage type 103 configuration is not working fine as the quantities of the same material with the same batch sent to the same stype 103, and destination bin are not being added. So by running stock report in WM we see several lines with partial quantities instead of only one line with the total quantity in place. Do anybody know how can that be solved? Or what can be the route cause of the issue? Is there any OSS known applicable to fix the problem?
    Thx for your help

    Hi Alba,
    Please check the WM views in MM.
    I've checked:
    (SAP help pushing F1 when the cursor is set on this thick box)
    <i>Indicator: Allow addition to existing stock
    Indicator determining whether a material with particular characteristics may be added to existing stock of the same material with the same characteristics in one storage bin.
    Dependencies
    If the storage type control table does not allow additions to existing stock for this storage type, the indicator set in the material master record is ineffective.</i>
    +
    (SAP help)
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_46c/helpdata/en/c6/f8449d4afa11d182b90000e829fbfe/frameset.htm
    I think you have to set this indicator!
    BR
    Csbaa

  • SAP WM: Mixed pallet with putaway strategy "P"

    Dear Experts,
    I am using putaway strategy P for a storage type and I have given X for Mixed storage field.
    I am not able to put multiple batches of same material in one bin, is it possible with putaway strategy P
    I am not using SU management.
    Thanks in advance,
    Amit Kumar

    This is from a WM colleague:
    First it will always look at same bin as a material is stored
    with put away strategy “I”. 
    This scenario is completely wrong, if I understand it right.
    He/she needs to look at the bin strategy for the SU types
    defined in the LE qty. / SUT types for bin type.
    Strategy “I” is for addition to stock like they said.
    Capacity check 2 only works if it is SUT active, which they say it is
    not.  Not the check flag, but the SUT.
    The strategy for SUT type allowed to bin type only works if it
    is SUT managed, which they say it is not.
    The strategy just doesn’t seem right.  If they do not use
    SU’s, the only capacity check that works is max from the material master (WM-1
    view) weight “1”.
    The bin type / SUT strategy will not work unless they are using
    SUT’s for storage.  Not just the LE qty. in the SUT defined.
    If they aren’t using SUTs for storage, it is only a quant.
    Noting is configurable for strategy of quant to storage bin type.

  • Putaway strategy K: near picking bin

    Hi guys,
    I am experimenting putaway strategy K with 2 storage types, fixed bins & reserve. In my setup when capacity check is enabled in fixed storage type and no capacity left, the system searches for another bin from reserve and it works fine.
    However my requirement would be that system would switch to reserve bins right away if fixed storage bin is NOT empty. Standard customization does not allow to disable "addition to existing stock" in case of putaway strategy is F - fixed bins.
    Any advice how to achieve this in standard system or is the user exit needed?

    Hello,
    Put away strategy K (Near Picking Bin) is used for materials that is being is frequently picked, as it is appropriate to store the material close to picking area.
    In this strategy system will try to place the material in fixed bin, if not the system will try a reserve bin, the baseline is system will do placement in a bin which is closest to picking area using configured search.
    You can define this in transaction OMLA.
    The screen will shows six possible configurations selections;
    >Put away strategy activation
    >Storage type control definition
    >Search per level definition
    >Row ans shelf assignment
    >Storage bin generation
    >Consistency checks
    Also in IMG >>Logistics Execution>>Warehouse Management>>Strategies>>Put away strategies>>Define strategy for Near Picking Bin
    For respective warehouse and storage type, it is genuinely to leave the configuration with only 'K' in stock placement control and this will surely perform put away in reserve bin as expected and required by you, without searching for the fixed bin or carrying out a search for a relevant bin.
    Br,
    Tushar
    Edited by: Tushar Patankar on Dec 30, 2010 10:43 PM
    Edited by: Tushar Patankar on Dec 30, 2010 10:43 PM

  • Using ID Point for Repacking - no putaway strategy allowed

    Hi All,
    I have a business requirement to have an ID Point servicing inventory that is putaway to one specific storage type. HUM is active and when the goods are received at 902 they are potentially packed on a pallet. The pallet is moved to the ID point where it is unpacked and then put away.
    The systems allows configuration of only one repacking area per warehouse number where you can assign a fixed bin.
    Unfortunately the business do not want this activity happening at the normal repacking area (923) which is also used for other things so must remain configured.
    In order to perform repacking at the ID Point I must have no putaway strategy assigned to the storage type. Without the putaway strategy. how can I get the system to select a bin - any bin will do, either a fixed bin, a dynamic coordinate, it doesn't matter.
    I have a backup solution which to create a special movement indicator, new mvt type and enter the destination bin in the movement type, however I'm looking for something a little "nicer".
    Regards,
    Busaboy.

    Dear Karthik
    You are right, I did activated Indicator: Activate Storage Unit Type Check for Stock Placement in SPRO->LE->WM->Master Data->Define Storage Type
    The Indicator: Storage type with storage unit management was also ticked automatically by system when I selected Indicator: Activate Storaget Unit Type Check for Stock Placement.
    Are you trying to say the ID Port defined in Storage Type will have higher priority over the Storage Type value I maintained in the Storage Type Search Table?
    I have already maintained the Storage Bin and I still do not understand why system still go for ID port. As far as I know, system will suggest the Storage Type from ID Port ONLY if storage bin in this storage type as their destination are not maintained in first in the other setting.
    Quoted from SAP HELP
    Identification point for storage type
    Identification point (storage type) of the current storage type.
    All goods movements that do not have a specific storage bin in this storage type as their destination are first directed to the identification point.
    Here the goods are identified and a transfer order is generated for the actual transfer of the goods into the storage type concerned.
    Please help.
    Edited by: Daimos on Nov 4, 2011 3:25 AM

  • [WM] Putaway strategy for bulk storage type SU-managed

    Hi Gurus,
    I need your help
    I have a Bulk storage type with SU-managed. I would undestand the real behaviour of putaway strategy B.
    1)  Case 1: assume that in bulk storage type there are the followed bins (rows):
    - in bin XX1 there is material AAA
    - Bin XX2 is empty
    In this situation if i receive material AAA, putaway strategy B chooses the bin XX1 by background processing - correct!
    2) Case 2: assume that in bulk storage type there are the followed bins (rows):
    - In Bin XX1 there is material AAA
    - in Bin XX2 there is material AAA
    - in Bin XX3 there is material AAA
    In this situation if i receive material AAA, i don't undestand the behaviour of putaway strategy B. Seems that the system chooses in random way the bin (XX1, XX2 and XX3).
    P.S: the storage unit type is one of default - E1.
    Can you help me?
    Thank very much

    You told
    Addn to Stock: X
    Block upon placement: empty
    Then How can you have Case 2?
    In Bin XX1 there is material AAA
    Next time also stock goes to XX1 only not XX2 unless you overwrite manually.
    What does your block strage structure looks like? i'm sorry but i don't undestand your question.
    Go to OMM4 "Define-Block struct." and look No. SUs for your St. bin type, SUT & Bulk stor Ind.

  • Putaway Strategy I, not allowing second material with different batch

    Hi all,
    Can someone please help me to understand where is the problem
    My config is
    Strg Typ 401
    Putaway Strategy I
    Capacity check - 4
    Mixed storage: X
    Addition to existing stock: X
    Storage section check -active
    Storage bin created for the storage section in the storage type 401
    Maximum capacity maintained in Storage bin
    In material master WM view 1- maintained capacity.
    When system is correctly finding Bin for First material / Batch combination
    But when I am trying to create TO for same material with different batch it does not find storage bin - even the storage bin capacity is still remaining
    Also it is not accepting second material in same bin.
    The only requirement to have startegy I is that same materials can be placed in same Bins (sorry but dont need fixed bin)
    Thanks

    Hi Hiren,
    You are correct I forgot to mention that in my earlier reply. Actually with out storage unit you can store only one quant in a Bin. So it can add stock to the same quant if we use addition to existing sock feature. If the material batch combination changes it cannot use the same quant, so it wont be able to add the stock to existing quant. If a new quant is to be stored in the same BIN it has to be storage unit managed. To in nutshell multi material multi batch your scenario can be achieved with storage unit managed storage type.
    For storage unit setup you can refer below link.
    Storage Unit Management - Warehouse Management System (WMS) - SAP Library
    If you find this useful please close the tread.
    Regards
    Abhishek

  • Bulk Putaway Strategy

    Hi,
    I have a query relating to the determination of bins for my bulk putaway strategy.
    On my bulk storage type I am using putaway strategy B (Bulk Storage) and mixed storage indicator C (several batches per bin only SU bulk storage)
    Having generated a putaway the system successfully denotes next empty bin until capacity as per the block structure under OMM4 is full. So far so good however it does not then allocate the remainder of the putaway to a bin where the same product is house although a different batch. (ie the error message below appears)
    System message L3  009
      No destination storage bin to be found in storage type 004
    However i can manually denote a bin where there is already the same material but with a different batch. The system then allows this entry.
    Does anybody understd why the system would not automatically select this bin which should be ok?
    Any ideas appreciated.
    many thanks,
    Adam.

    Must be a slow start to the year...too many Xmas ales...
    Solution: Set Level of Total Quant Count to 1
    Level of Total Quant Count
    The Total field is used for internal calculation of the total quant count for SU-managed bulk storage. This parameter influences both stock placements and stock removals.
    Stock Placement
    For putaways this parameter controls whether the system will automatically mix batches or not. If the parameter is set to "1" (batch neutral), the system looks for a storage bin where the material already exists. The batch number is not taken into consideration in this case. If the parameter is set to "2" (batch specific), the system looks for a storage bin where the batch of the material already exists and attempts to add the new stock to the existing stock. If that isnu2019t possible, the system looks for an empty storage bin.

  • WM/HU - Putaway strategy

    Hello to everybody.
    To explane my scenario I will give you an example:
    Storage type CT1 has several storage bins. Every storage bin can contain one or more HU. I can set the maximum number of SU that the bin can contain in the putaway strategy P. This allows me to use an automatic process to putaway the HUs. But this is not enough for me. I also want the possibility to storage manually more HUs than the limit setted in the putaway strategy. And I want to do that because I also manage the production returns: for this reason the HUs don't have the same dimensions.
    Is this possible?
    If yes, how?
    Thank you so much for your help!
    Edited by: ConsViv on Nov 17, 2010 4:13 PM

    Storage sections are for putaway purposes only.
    The best way to think about it is they are a collection of bins within a storage type that direct a putaway.
    Example:
    Let say you are a company that makes hats.  You have a storage type for your bulk whsing that has aisles 3 levels high.  Now lets say that your blue hats sell faster than your red hats, and your red hats sell faster than your green hats.  So you want to store your blue hats on the bottom rack, your red hats on the middle rack, and the green ones way up top in the highest rack.
    You can do this with storage sections.  You would configure 3 storage sections that include the bins in the 3 different levels of rack.  Then you would configure a strategy for those sections - so that you can say if you want to place in the bottom rack and it is full - you go to the middle rack etc.
    Then you designate each material with a storage section in the material master.
    Now - when you have placements - you red hats get to the right place.

  • Replenishment From SU Managed Bulk Storage Type

    Hi Experts,
    We are trying to implement Immediate TO Creation Random Bin Management from a SU Managed Bulk Storage Type.
    Our scenario is the following:
    We have a SU Managed Bulk Stype: Stype 702
    We have a SU Managed Stype with Putaway Strategy "P": Stype 701
    We have material 11000026 and we define the following in WM View 2:
    Max Qt: 6000
    Min Qt: 2000
    Replenishment Qt: 3000 
    Whenever a delivery TO from 701 is confirmed, and the stock level of material 11000026 in SType 701 drops below the Min. Qt, we need the system to immediately generate a replenishment TO: 3000 kg from Source SType 702 to Destination SType 701.
    So far we have done the following:
    Created a WM.Mov.Type 721, for which Manual TO creation is not allowed and with Ref.Stor.type Search 721.
    We defined Replenishment Control for SType 701: with Replenishment Mov.Type 721 and Replenishment Technique 2.
    Created SType Indicator with Operation A and Ref.Stor.type Search 721; in the sequence the first and only SType is Stype 702.
    We assigned the SType Indicator to Material in WM View 1.
    Whenever we actually confirm a delivery TO from 701 and the stock level drops below the min Qt., the system is not generating the immediate TO. What is the correct configuration or how can I achieve our request?
    (The configuration described above works perfectly between STypes that have both the same Putaway Strategy, "P")
    Thank you,
    Leonidas Oyaga

    Hi Mihailo,
    Just tried running Tx. LT0R. I get Error Message No. L3009: "no destination storage bin to be found in storage type 701."
    (Before doing this, I deleted ID Point 711 from SType 701).
    I believe the issue is related to the relationship between SU Managed Bulk SType (702) and SType 701. In 702 stock in a storage bin can be identified based on the SU. However, when creating the TR or OT the system is not able to find a destination storage bin because the quantity taken from a storage bin in 702 is greater than the max quantity allowed in a single storage bin in 701. As if when picking the quantities it is trying to deliver the whole quantity to a single storage bin instead of transfering each SU (1000 KG per SU) to a different storage bin.
    For Instance:
    Material 11000026 Stype 701
    Min Qt: 2000
    Max Qt: 6000
    Replenishment Qt: 4000
    Storage Bin Capacity in 701: 1000
    When stock level drops belowe Min. Qt, and the system tries to do replenishment from 702 by delivering 4000, the system is not able to find a storage bin in storage type 701 because it excedes the storage bin capacity.
    Best Regards,
    Leonidas Oyaga

  • Pallet putaway strategy question

    Dear all,
    I am new in the pallet putaway strategy and need your experience advise if you have done this.
    Question.
    1 - To use the pallet putaway strategy (i.e. P), do I need to configure the Storage Bin Type search (i.e. spro > logistics execution > wm > strategies > activate storage bin type search)?? Is it compulsory?
    2 - To use the pallet putaway strategy, the storage type MUST BE a SUT-managed and that the "SUT check activate" checkbox MUST Checked, am I correct?
    thanks
    Tuff

    Hi,
    the storage bin type search and the storage unit type check more or less is the same. You have to define storage unit types, storage bin types, assign which SUT goes into which SBT. Well, and then you activate the check.
    You need to do this for the pallet strategy. You do NOT need to activate the storage unit management in a storage type with the pallet strategy.
    Best regards
    Juergen

  • Putaway strategy 'Q' Dynamic quant

    Hi,
    We have an issue with the internal movement of stock from a storage type that does not allow partial quantity picking.
    Scenario: The Putaway strategy for the St type has been configured as 'Q' and picking strategy as 'F'. The available stock in the bin/quant is say 1000 Boxes. I have created a transfer order to pick only 600 boxes. when i confirm the transfer order system is confirming the full 1000 boxes rather than picking only partial qty. Full stock removal has not been activated for this St type in config.
    We would like to know if this is something to do with the st type with Q config(like does Q allows picking of complete quant only?).
    if anyone has faced this issue earlier would be great to get some hints.
    Thanks,
    Harish

    For our movement type over deliveries are allowed. Below is my observation:
    1. when we transfer stock from bulk storage type system allowing us to confirm part pallet using mvt type say 9**.
    2. when we transfer stock from dynamic quant number then system does not allow us to confirm part pallet but confirms full pallet only and this is using the same mvt type 9**.
    we are using same movement type for transfer of stock from both these storage type onto a staging area which is a interim location but system is behaving differently for these two scenarios.
    I am not sure if standard SAP has made dynamic quant storage type to allow withdrawal of full pallet only and needs help if someone has faced similar issue.
    Best Regards,
    Harish

  • Putaway strategy EWR (storage location re pack)

    Hello Experts,
    In order to repack certain part numbers that come in as nested HUs, yet need to be delivered as single HUs (subwoofer, Klima compressor, u2026), directly after goods receipt, these parts should be redirected directly to the repack area. Therefore we ask for the creation of a putaway strategy EWR that will allow for this.
    Could you help me to know what  puway strategy can l use and how configurate this in the system.
    Regards,
    Hugo

    Hi,
    First put way strategy is for different function it is not meant for packing function
    You can explore packing functionality and or HANDLING UNIT MANAGEMENT
    In your case you have to distributed HU and this you want to pack in 1 HU
    Check t-code HUPAST
    When you go inside you will find option Pack material and pack HUs
    kapil

  • Putaway strategy for rack storage and floor

    HI
    we have define one warehouse room as One Storage Type. its rack storage . Storage unit
    managed . in each storage bin one Su (pallet) can be placed. Some times we keep stocks (on pallets) on the floor
    (Pallets in one layer). No of Pallets(SU) is defined at that floor, say 100 pallets can be placed on the floor.
    we need Capacity check method = 2 (Check based on palletization accord. to SUT 1).
    Which Putaway strategy should be applied for this storage type.? considering 1 bin = 1 pallet and Pallets on the floor.
    thanks & regards
    thomas

    Hi Hein
    yes, creating seperate storage type for racking and floor is a solution.
    but if we want to keep it as whole room as One Storage type.
    what you think about   putaway strategy "P" Pallet putaway strategy.   if we consider floor as speerate BIN TYPE and define BIN TYPE and SUT  permitted .  And Allowed SU in that BIN TYPE.
    your opnion please.
    thanks & best regards
    Thomas

  • Pallet Putaway Strategy

    Hello All,
    I think the main advantage of having Pallet Putaway is that we  can
    manage several quants in one storage bin without having mixed storage.
    i.e., through bin sectioning.
    But when I have pallet strategy and have my storage type without
    Mixed storage active, system is not allowing that. If this is not happening
    then whats the purpose of sectioning bin when already we have the
    segregation at Quant level. Please guide on this.
    Thanks and regards,
    Milton Isaac

    Hi
    I am not sure I understand the issue
    If you want pallet storage I would expect this to be because you want to have one pallet in one bin
    If this is not the case then maybe you could try 'C' which is open storage
    Also if you want to have multiple items in one bin then surely you would select Mixed storage allowed
    I hope that this helps
    Frenchy

Maybe you are looking for

  • How to do this in photoshop?

    Hi! See this image This black fish like layer is at the end of this whole image. I want to save this layer as a footer with no white space but I was unable to do this in photoshop as well as in illustrator. Please can anyone explain it?

  • Will the lightning to 30 pin adapter play music through my dock

    My husband has a 7th gen iPod nano, and I have a docking station for my iPhone 3GS, we have been looking at the lightning to 30 pin adapter today music through my dock, will this work?

  • Drop box thinks I am offline

    Hi, I noticed my drop box folder wasnt saving the work I had done so decided to use a clean up app to delete it, then I went to and downloaded it again. Now I get this???

  • Error in Full Join

    Hi All I am using a full join in my interface But it is showing Interface contains error You cannot execute the interface Source panel of the diagram: Clause set to full join on a technology that does not support full joins Source panel of the diagra

  • MobileMe - HELP PLEASE

    Recently up-graded to SL and now when using MobileMe Gallery widget can no longer see published movies for use on my iweb pages. The movies are all there and as far as I can tell all check boxes are correct. Before the SL up-grade I had no problems -