Putting a gap in a rule below

Hello,
Whenever I design a form that requires rules below (e.g. Name______________ Address______________), I frequently have a need to have a gap in the rule below. For example, I might have State_________ Zip____________ on one line, but I seem to be forced to insert a little table here in order to get that gap. There must be an easier way! If you know how to create a gap in the rule, which then starts up again a little later on the same line, I would be most grateful if you could share!
Thanks,
Trina

Trina,
My trick totally depends on the order InDesign draws its stuff. You cannot influence this. But I just tried it, and (of course) I was right after all:
Trina Larson wrote:
Your method sounds intriguing in certain situations, with the exception being that the tabs will be changing depending on the length of the text, which would mean constantly overriding the Paragraph Style to fix the tabs.
Well yeah, but (1) you need to do that anyway.
(2) You only need to set tab stops where each next item should start -- to get a bit of white space 'before' and 'after' text, just type in a space or en-space.
(3) You don't need to add a tab at the very end to have the rule run to the right margin. Paragraph rules run all the way by default.
(4) (uh, what was it?) Oh yeah: since this all can be set up in the Paragraph Style and Character Style, you only have to change these for a global change. For example, you might decide you want a thinner line; or you want it to move up or down a bit.
Re (1): I don't think there is a good way to do something like this without custom tab settings. (You could manually insert underscores or underlined spaces. But that's not a "good" way.)

Similar Messages

  • Rule below overprints descender

    We've been using the rule-below in some paragraph styles that use green type. The rule is tight to the baseline, so the descenders extend past it. On our old template, the green covers the black rule. But we've recently made a copy of that template and now the black rule is visible across the green descender.
    It does not display this way. On screen it appears that the green is covering the rule. But on output, the black is visible across the green. We're using the same printers and presets as before. The new template is a copy of the old, but many modifications have been made.
    The rule below is applied by a paragraph style. The new style is a copy of the old but at a slightly smaller type size. The rule-below size has not been changed.
    The green type is applied by a character style using a swatch.
    I am completely baffled.

    It sounds like the green text is set to overprint (the black overprint won't matter because it is behind the type). You have to turn on Overprint Preview to see the print effects of overprinting. So here you can see my window shows I have [Overprint Preview] on, with the top green line set to OP and the bottom line set to knockout:

  • How can I create paragraph rules below a heading in InDesign CS5?

    I have created a rule but the headings are appearing sometimes with a rule both above and below and sometimes only below...the display is inconsistent.
    I'd be very happy if someone could tell me what I'm doing wrong here.
    Here is a screenshot - note the red "Course type headings". If it's too small to see please visit this link https://dl.dropbox.com/u/17454370/paragraph_style_problem.png
    Thank you, SG

    THANK YOU!!!
    I now have it displaying both above and below, but cannot get it to just show below. I have tried unchecking 'rule on' for rule above, but nothing changes.
    SG
    update: I get it; I need to play with inserting and deleting new paragraphs!
    Thanks so much, Bob.
    Message was edited by: sally_g

  • A gap of 1 row below address bar in firefox browser after I installed Google Toolbar. Unistalling both and then installing just firefox hasn't helped. Any solutions?

    I am not able to remove the 1-inch gap which came just after installing google toolbar. After that, I uninstalled Google Toolbar and Firefox respectively and then again, installed Firefox alone but the gap of 1-inch (1 row) remains just below the address bar of the browser. How to remove it?

    Hi Danieldesira,
    Thanks for the solution, it worked!!! I disabled extensions one by one except Google Toolbar. I observed that the gap was removed only after removing Norton Toolbar 5.6 version. For now, I have removed the toolbar of Norton but it seems necessary for security purpose. Can we keep it on and still hide since in the empty row it generates in Firefox is not showing a single button or anything else.
    Thanks.

  • How to add the ability to put EL expressions in Navigation Rules

    I had a need to dynamically determine what page to return to in a JSF application. There has to be an easier way, but here's how I wanted to do it. I wanted to put an EL expression in my <to-view-id> nav rules in the JSF config file (e.g. faces-config.xml). This isn't allowed. So I built my own custom ViewHandler to do it.
    1) Define the ViewHandler in faces-config.xml:
         <application>
              <view-handler>com.msd.tts.pluggable.MyDynamicViewHandler</view-handler>
         </application>2) Create the class:
    package com.msd.tts.pluggable;
    import java.io.IOException;
    import java.util.Locale;
    import javax.faces.*;
    import javax.faces.application.ViewHandler;
    import javax.faces.component.UIViewRoot;
    import javax.faces.context.*;
    import javax.faces.el.ValueBinding;
    import com.sun.faces.util.Util;
    * Adds ability to put EL expressions in the <to-view-id> Navigation Rules in JSF
    * configuration file (faces-config.xml).
    * @author          Craig Peters
    * @version          1.0
    public class MyDynamicViewHandler extends ViewHandler {
         * The original handler we are customizing.
        private ViewHandler prevHandler = null;
        /** Creates a new instance of MappingViewHandler. By including
         * a parameter of the same type, we encourage the JSF framework
         * to pass a reference of the previously used ViewHandler. This way
         * we can use all the previous functionality and override only the
         * method we are interested in (in this case, the getActionURL() method).
         public MyDynamicViewHandler(ViewHandler prevHandler) {
              this.prevHandler = prevHandler;
         @Override
         public String getActionURL(FacesContext context, String viewId) {
              return prevHandler.getActionURL(context, viewId);
         @Override
         public Locale calculateLocale(FacesContext context) {
              return prevHandler.calculateLocale(context);
         @Override
         public String calculateRenderKitId(FacesContext context) {
              return prevHandler.calculateRenderKitId(context);
         @Override
         public UIViewRoot createView(FacesContext context, String viewId) {
              return prevHandler.createView(context, viewId);
         @Override
         public String getResourceURL(FacesContext context, String path) {
              return prevHandler.getResourceURL(context, path);
         @Override
         public void renderView(FacesContext context, UIViewRoot viewToRender)
                   throws IOException, FacesException {
              String result = viewToRender.getViewId();
              if (Util.isVBExpression(viewToRender.getViewId())) {
                   ValueBinding vb = context.getApplication().createValueBinding(viewToRender.getViewId());
                   result = vb.getValue(context).toString();
              if (result.charAt(0) != '/')
                   throw new IllegalArgumentException("Illegal view ID " + result + ". The ID must begin with '/'");
              viewToRender.setViewId(result);
              prevHandler.renderView(context, viewToRender);
         @Override
         public UIViewRoot restoreView(FacesContext context, String viewId) {
              return prevHandler.restoreView(context, viewId);
         @Override
         public void writeState(FacesContext context) throws IOException {
              prevHandler.writeState(context);
    }3) Use EL in navigation rules:
         <navigation-rule>
              <from-view-id>/CommonForm.jsp</from-view-id>
              <navigation-case>
                   <to-view-id>#{bean.caller}</to-view-id>
              </navigation-case>
         </navigation-rule>The "bean.caller" method will have saved the page to go back to.
    Comments are welcome. I just didn't see any other way to dynamically go back to an arbitrary page.
    Thanks.

    CraigRPeters wrote:
    Comments are welcome.Nice stuff. But that means that navigation is hardwired in the backing bean instead of faces-config.xml. Forget this comment if you've maintained a propertiesfile/configurationfile for that.
    I just didn't see any other way to dynamically go back to an arbitrary page.You can declare more than one from-outcome and/or from-action for one from-view-id.

  • I want to put a slideshow onto a page on my website without having the pics and/or albums listed below

    how can you put a slideshow on a page in iweb without putting the albums and or pictures below?

    Here's one way to do it using iWeb's photo slideshow (without showing the individual photos) on this test page: Page-7.  All it takes is some code, listed on the test page, in an HTML snippet. Also for the photo page be sure there are no options selected, i.e. like downloads, reflections, subscriptions, etc.
    Be sure to go to Cyclosaurus' site, a link in on the test page, to see his version of it.
    OT

  • Udev/hal rules won't automount my ipod

    After following directions in the wiki articles on hal and udev to get my ipod to automount and generate the /dev/ipod device, I'm at a loss because nothing seems to work as explained. (I'm running Arch64 with LXDE)
    I've added the following rule to /etc/hal/fdi/policy/ipod.fdi:
    <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
    <device>
    <match key="@block.storage_device:storage.model" string="iPod">
    <merge key="volume.policy.desired_mount_point" type="string">ipod</merge>
    <merge key="volume.policy.mount_option.iocharset=iso8859-15" type="bool">true</merge>
    <merge key="volume.policy.mount_option.sync" type="bool">true</merge>
    </match>
    </device>
    I've added the following rule to /etc/udev/rules.d/60-ipod.rules
    BUS=="usb", ATTRS{manufacturer}=="Apple*", ATTRS{model}=="iPod*", KERNEL=="sd?2", SYMLINK+="ipod", NAME="%k", GROUP="storage"
    When I plug in the ipod, Pcmanfm will show 'Apple Ipod Music Player' in the left column with the other drives. When I click on it, it will properly mount the ipod to /media/{name of ipod}. I would like it to mount every ipod at /media/ipod, and create a link /dev/ipod. I haven't put anything in the fstab yet, but in any case, the /dev/ipod link is not created. I know the udev rules work, because it will create the correct link for /dev/pilot when I plug in my Palm.
    Help! I'm trying hard to wrap my brain around this, and I don't understand why it's not creating the /dev/ipod link. I've restarted the computer and restarted hal and reloaded udev rules multiple times with no changes.
    Thanks!
    Scott

    Ahhh....thank you!  If I take out the 'last_rule' option it does indeed show up on pcmanfm. However, I think it's happening somewhere outside the parsing of the udev rules (perhaps HAL???) because even if I moved the local rules to the very last (99-local.rules) but kept in the 'last_rule' option, it would still not show up.
    Now, second problem is trying to distinguish between flash drive and ipod. I thought you could use a != on an attribute. The rules below still result in /dev/sdb2 on the ipod getting mounted twice .... once to /media/ipod and once to /media/usbhd-sdb2.
    ## Automount usb drives
    #Prevent sd?1 of the ipod from being mounted
    KERNEL=="sd?1", ATTRS{manufacturer}=="Apple*", ATTRS{product}=="iPod*", OPTIONS="last_rule"
    KERNEL=="sd?2", ATTRS{manufacturer}=="Apple*", ATTRS{product}=="iPod*", SYMLINK+="ipod", NAME="%k", GROUP="storage"
    ACTION=="add", KERNEL=="sd?2", ATTRS{manufacturer}=="Apple*", ATTRS{product}=="iPod*", RUN+="/bin/mount -t vfat -o rw,noauto,shortname=mixed,flush,dirsync,quiet,noatime,nodiratime,uid=1000,utf8,umask=077,nodev,nosuid /dev/ipod /media/ipod"
    #Automount flash drives to /media/usbdh-sd??
    ACTION=="add", ATTRS{product}!="iPod*", KERNEL=="sd[b-z][0-9]", RUN+="/bin/mkdir -p /media/usbhd-%k"
    KERNEL=="sd[b-z]", ATTRS{product}!="iPod*", NAME="%k", SYMLINK+="usbhd-%k", GROUP="storage"
    ACTION=="add", KERNEL=="sd[b-z][0-9]", ATTRS{product}!="iPod*", SYMLINK+="usbhd-%k", GROUP="storage", NAME="%k"
    ACTION=="add", KERNEL=="sd[b-z][0-9]", ATTRS{product}!="iPod*", RUN+="/bin/mkdir -p /media/usbhd-%k"
    ACTION=="add", KERNEL=="sd[b-z][0-9]", ATTRS{product}!="iPod*", RUN+="/bin/ln -s /media/usbhd-%k /mnt/usbhd-%k"
    ACTION=="add", KERNEL=="sd[b-z][0-9]", ATTRS{product}!="iPod*", PROGRAM=="/lib/udev/vol_id -t %N", RESULT=="vfat", RUN+="/bin/mount -t vfat -o rw,noauto,flush,dirsync,quiet,nodev,nosuid,noatime,nodiratime,dmask=000,fmask=111 /dev/%k /media/usbhd-%k"
    ACTION=="add", KERNEL=="sd[b-z][0-9]", ATTRS{product}!="iPod*", RUN+="/bin/mount -t auto -o rw,noauto,async,dirsync,nodev,noatime /dev/%k /media/usbhd-%k"
    #Unmount everything on removal
    ACTION=="remove", KERNEL=="sd[a-z][0-9]", RUN+="/bin/rm -f /mnt/usbhd-%k"
    ACTION=="remove", KERNEL=="sd[a-z][0-9]", RUN+="/bin/umount -l /dev/%k"
    ACTION=="remove", KERNEL=="sd[a-z][0-9]", RUN+="/bin/rmdir /media/usbhd-%k"
    Any ideas?
    Thanks, Scott

  • Dynamic Business Rules - Where to place

    Hi,
    I am doing POC for a fortune 10 client and they have some business rules before crud actions are going to take place in DB. We have very minimal tables (less than 10) and its small application but web service (btw, this has to be webservice app) consumers are around 200 per sec.
    The requirement with respect to business rules are also minimal (like 30 rules for entire project) but these rules will change very often(like once in a month). Assume these rules are on the enterprise level and not on the application level.
    I am looking for best possible solution to achieve by developing small rules engine or putting them into another xml and apply transformation once request arrives.
    I am confused of deciding which is better like putting business rules in xslt vs java business object. XSLT is allowing me to change rules with minimum impact on the system but it is hard to maintain and adding new rules (we are not anticipating any more new rules within next two years).
    On the other hand, If I put in Java business object then it allows lot of flexibility to inject new rules and easy to maintain with cleaner code.
    So, in short my questions are below.
    1. Is it good practice to put small set of business rules in xml/xslt?
    2.are there any alternative business rules engines are available?
    Any other suggestion related to above discussions are welcome.
    Thanks.

    I believe this is what you want.
    DROOLS - drools - dynamic rules for java
    http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=37037
    http://www.onjava.com/pub/a/onjava/2005/08/03/drools.html?page=2
    good luck.

  • Populating dropdown with Map rule

    Hey,
    I am currently getting a list of users that belong to an admin role and looking up the individual fullnames to create a map to display the name in the dropdown but pass the accountId once the form is submitted. My rule is below however the result of my rule currently gives me this:
    <List>
    <Map>
    <MapEntry key='id1' value=name1'/>
    </Map>
    <Map>
    <MapEntry key='id2' value='name2'/>
    </Map>
    </List>
    I really just want something like this so i can put it in the valueMap property in a dropdown:
    <Map>
    <MapEntry key='id1' value='name1'/>
    <MapEntry key='id2' value='name2'/>
    </Map>
    Any ideas how i need to change my rule below:
    <block>
    <defvar name='idList'>
    <invoke name='getUsers' class='com.waveset.ui.FormUtil'>
    <ref>:display.session</ref>
    <map>
    <s>conditions</s>
    <map>
    <s>adminRoles</s>
    <s>Role</s>
    </map>
    </map>
    </invoke>
    </defvar>
    <dolist name='entry'>
    <ref>idList</ref>
    <map>
    <ref>entry</ref>
    <invoke name='getAttribute'>
    <invoke name='getObject'>
    <ref>:display.session</ref>
    <s>User</s>
    <ref>entry</ref>
    </invoke>
    <s>fullname</s>
    </invoke>
    </map>
    </dolist>
    </block>

    Try:
    <block>
    <defvar name='idList'>
    <invoke name='getUsers' class='com.waveset.ui.FormUtil'>
    <ref>:display.session</ref>
    <map>
    <s>conditions</s>
    <map>
    <s>adminRoles</s>
    <s>Role</s>
    </map>
    </map>
    </invoke>
    </defvar>
    <defvar name='retMap'>
    <new class='java.util.HashMap'/>
    </defvar>
    <dolist name='entry'>
    <ref>idList</ref>
    <set>
    <ref>retMap</ref>
    <ref>entry</ref>
    <invoke name='getAttribute'>
    <invoke name='getObject'>
    <ref>:display.session</ref>
    <s>User</s>
    <ref>entry</ref>
    </invoke>
    <s>fullname</s>
    </invoke>
    </set>
    </dolist>
    <ref>retMap</ref>
    </block>

  • HFM Equity Accounting Rules - Time dependant

    Has anyone needed to amend HFM Rules for Equity Accounting, we are in the process of doing so, we a new app in which we will be Equity Accounting from Proportional. Elim Rule for JV's are time dependant to run after 2014. However after we have included the Sub Eliminate section for the new rule it does not run after 2014. I attach the section of the rule below: Any help would be grateful.
    Sub EliminateNew_EQ(sAccount, sICP, sCustom3)
    If POV_YEAR > "2014" Then
    ' Rules have been chanegd for Equity Accounting from 2014 onwards - plug accounts no longer populated and JV accounts now holding 100% of balances.
    sParent = HS.Parent.Member()
    sPlugAcct = HS.Account.PlugAcct(sAccount)
    IsEliminated = False
    'Checks if eliminations should be performed
    'If ICP member is not [ICP None]
    If (StrComp(sICP, "[ICP None]", vbTextCompare) <> 0) Then
      'If account is an ICP account
      If HS.Account.IsICP(sAccount) Then
       'If the account has a plug account
       If sPlugAcct <> "" Then
        'If the ICP partner is a descendant of the current parent (we've reached the first common parent)
        If HS.Parent.IsDescendant(sParent, sICP) Then
         IsEliminated = True
        End If
       End If
      End If
    End If
    'Performs eliminations if required
    If IsEliminated Then
      PConEntity = HS.Node.PCon("")
      ' Rules have been chanegd for Equity Accounting from 2014 onwards - plug accounts no longer populated and JV accounts now holding 100% of balances.
      'If one of these accounts
      Select Case sAccount
      Case "310401", "416701", "323301", "130101", "237011", "237021", "237001", "237043", "237045", "C100241", "C100225", "C100227"
             'Eliminate input account balance on C3#Input, C3#JV or C3#Sub members
       Call HS.Con("V#[Elimination]", PConEntity * -1, "")
       'If entity is a sub and ICP is JV
       If sCustom3 = "Sub" And Trim(HS.Entity.UD1(sICP)) = "JV" Then
        sParentICP = GetICPParent(sParent,sICP)
        PConICP = HS.Node.PCon("E#" & sParentICP & "." & sICP)
        If sAccount = "310401" Then
         'Post 1-PConICP normally(50%) to JV account and ConICP (normally 50%) to inter company plug account
         Call HS.Con("V#[Elimination].A#301102_JV.C3#Input",1, "")
         'Call HS.Con("V#[Elimination].A#" & sPlugAcct & ".C3#Input", PConICP, "")
        ElseIf sAccount = "416701" Then
         Call HS.Con("V#[Elimination].A#416002_JV.C3#Input",1,"")
         'Call HS.Con("V#[Elimination].A#" & sPlugAcct & ".C3#Input", PConICP, "")
        ElseIf sAccount = "323301" Then
         Call HS.Con("V#[Elimination].A#323002_JV.C3#Input",1,"")
         'Call HS.Con("V#[Elimination].A#" & sPlugAcct & ".C3#Input", PConICP, "")
        'See subroutine description for details
        ElseIf sAccount = "130101" Then
         dData = HS.GetCell("A#130101.I#" & sICP & C1C2C3C4Top)
         If dData < 0 Then
          Call HS.Con("V#[Elimination].A#200202_JV.C1#Less1.C3#Input",1, "")
         Else
          Call HS.Con("V#[Elimination].A#119002_JV.C1#Less1.C3#Input",1, "")
         End If
         'Call HS.Con("V#[Elimination].A#" & sPlugAcct & ".C3#Input", PConICP, "")
        ElseIf sAccount = "237011" Or sAccount = "237021" Then
         Call HS.Con("V#[Elimination].A#236005_JV.C3#Input",1, "")
         'Call HS.Con("V#[Elimination].A#" & sPlugAcct & ".C3#Input", PConICP, "")
        ElseIf sAccount = "237001" Then
         Call HS.Con("V#[Elimination].A#237001_JV.C3#Input",1, "")
         'Call HS.Con("V#[Elimination].A#" & sPlugAcct & ".C3#Input", PConICP, "")
        ElseIf sAccount = "237043" Then
         Call HS.Con("V#[Elimination].A#237044_JV.C3#Input",1, "")
         'Call HS.Con("V#[Elimination].A#" & sPlugAcct & ".C3#Input", PConICP, "")
        ElseIf sAccount = "237045" Then
         Call HS.Con("V#[Elimination].A#237046_JV.C3#Input",1, "")
         'Call HS.Con("V#[Elimination].A#" & sPlugAcct & ".C3#Input", PConICP, "")
        ElseIf sAccount = "C100241" Then
         Call HS.Con("V#[Elimination].A#C100302_JV.C3#Input",1, "")
         'Call HS.Con("V#[Elimination].A#" & sPlugAcct & ".C3#Input", PConICP, "")
        ElseIf sAccount = "C100225" Then
         Call HS.Con("V#[Elimination].A#C100225_JV.C3#Input",1, "")
         'Call HS.Con("V#[Elimination].A#" & sPlugAcct & ".C3#Input", PConICP, "")
        ElseIf sAccount = "C100227" Then
         Call HS.Con("V#[Elimination].A#C100227_JV.C3#Input",1, "")
         'Call HS.Con("V#[Elimination].A#" & sPlugAcct & ".C3#Input", PConICP, "")
    'Commented out because code never runs DC 17/06/10
    '    ElseIf sAccount = "C100311" Then
    '     Call HS.Con("V#[Elimination].A#C100315_JV.C3#Input", 1 - PConICP, "")
    '     Call HS.Con("V#[Elimination].A#" & sPlugAcct & ".C3#Input", PConICP, "")
        End If
       'If entity is a sub and ICP is a sub or entity is a JV
       ElseIf sCustom3 = "Sub" And Trim(HS.Entity.UD1(sICP)) <> "JV" _
       Or sCustom3 = "JV" Then
        'Post 100% of source value to IC plug account
        Call HS.Con("V#[Elimination].A#" & sPlugAcct & ".C3#Input", PConEntity, "")
       End If
      'Case other ICP accounts
      Case Else
    'Call WriteToFile("Posting to source account")
       Call HS.Con("V#[Elimination]", PConEntity * -1, "")
       Call HS.Con("V#[Elimination].A#" & sPlugAcct, PConEntity, "")
      End Select
    End If

    This has now been resolved after we put the Time dependancy with the Call Routines

  • Cisco ASA 5505 Rule

    I have an ASA 5505 router. I have configured most of the rules, but have had assistance from online forums and outside consultants
    configuring some rules. There is one in my configuration that I do not understand, and I do not remember entering it myself. The rule is blocking traffic
    when a server on the private side tries to send http traffic to itself. Not sure what the purpose of the rule is or why it is there.
    When I click on rule 35, it highlights both 35 and 36.
    #   Type       Source destination service interface address service DNS Rewrite Max TCP   Ebbronic Limit Max UDP... Randomize Seq #
    35 Dynamic any     <blank>     <blank>  inside      inside   <blank> <blank>     Unlimited Unlimited     Unlimited <checked>
    36 <blank> <blank> <blank>   <blank>  outside    outside <blank> <blank>     Unlimited Unlimited     Unlimited
    I am hesitant to delete the rule until I know the purpose.
    I am not sure but the rule below may be what is generatig it (I am not familiar withg command line commands):
    access-group outside_access_in in interface outside
    route outside 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 209.34.249.193 1
    Can someone tell me whay this is for, or what it is doing?                  

    I used Packet Tracer (a GUI tool) to determine which NAT rule was blocking the traffic I am trying to allow.  It was rule 35 & 36 as shown in my original post.  I attempted to correlate the gui rule to the cli.  I don't know if i picked the correct cli rule or not.  That is why I showed both of them.
    Since rule 35 is dynamic, I tried:
    Result of the command: "show run dynamic"
    crypto dynamic-map outside_dyn_map 20 set pfs group1
    crypto dynamic-map outside_dyn_map 20 set transform-set ESP-3DES-SHA
    This rule is part of the VPN setup I think, which would make sense because I had a consultant set it up for me.
    Result of the command: "show run global"
    global (inside) 1 interface
    global (outside) 1 interface
    global (outside) 199 xxx.xxx.249.200
    nat (inside) 0 access-list inside_nat0_outbound
    nat (inside) 199 access-list Mail
    nat (inside) 1 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0
    Result of the command: "show run static"
    static (inside,outside) tcp xxx.xxx.235.13 ftp 192.168.1.20 ftp netmask 255.255.255.255
    static (inside,outside) tcp xxx.xxx.249.200 smtp 192.168.1.119 smtp netmask 255.255.255.255
    static (inside,outside) tcp xxx.xxx.249.196 www 192.168.1.100 www netmask 255.255.255.255
    static (inside,outside) tcp xxx.xxx.249.197 www 192.168.1.101 www netmask 255.255.255.255
    static (inside,outside) tcp xxx.xxx.249.198 www 192.168.1.102 www netmask 255.255.255.255
    static (inside,outside) tcp xxx.xxx.249.199 www 192.168.1.103 www netmask 255.255.255.255
    static (inside,outside) tcp xxx.xxx.235.1 https 192.168.1.109 https netmask 255.255.255.255
    static (inside,outside) tcp xxx.xxx.235.2 https 192.168.1.110 https netmask 255.255.255.255
    static (inside,outside) tcp xxx.xxx.235.3 https 192.168.1.111 https netmask 255.255.255.255
    static (inside,outside) tcp xxx.xxx.235.4 https 192.168.1.112 https netmask 255.255.255.255
    static (inside,outside) tcp xxx.xxx.235.5 https 192.168.1.113 https netmask 255.255.255.255
    static (inside,outside) tcp xxx.xxx.235.6 https 192.168.1.114 https netmask 255.255.255.255
    static (inside,outside) tcp xxx.xxx.235.7 https 192.168.1.115 https netmask 255.255.255.255
    static (inside,outside) tcp xxx.xxx.235.8 https 192.168.1.116 https netmask 255.255.255.255
    static (inside,outside) tcp xxx.xxx.235.9 https 192.168.1.117 https netmask 255.255.255.255
    static (inside,outside) tcp xxx.xxx.235.10 https 192.168.1.118 https netmask 255.255.255.255
    static (inside,outside) tcp xxx.xxx.235.11 https 192.168.1.119 https netmask 255.255.255.255
    static (inside,outside) tcp xxx.xxx.235.12 https 192.168.1.120 https netmask 255.255.255.255
    static (inside,outside) tcp xxx.xxx.235.13 https 192.168.1.121 https netmask 255.255.255.255
    static (inside,outside) tcp xxx.xxx.235.13 www 192.168.1.121 www netmask 255.255.255.255
    static (inside,outside) tcp xxx.xxx.235.14 ftp 192.168.1.122 ftp netmask 255.255.255.255
    static (inside,outside) tcp xxx.xxx.235.14 ftp-data 192.168.1.122 ftp-data netmask 255.255.255.255
    static (inside,inside) tcp xxx.xxx.235.6 1443 192.168.1.40 1443 netmask 255.255.255.255
    static (inside,outside) tcp xxx.xxx.235.5 1443 192.168.1.40 1443 netmask 255.255.255.255
    static (inside,outside) tcp xxx.xxx.249.197 1080 access-list Nat1
    static (inside,outside) tcp xxx.xxx.249.198 1080 access-list Nat2
    static (inside,outside) tcp xxx.xxx.249.198 2080 access-list Nat4
    static (inside,outside) tcp xxx.xxx.249.197 2080 access-list Nat3
    static (inside,outside) tcp xxx.xxx.249.199 1080 access-list Nat5
    static (inside,outside) tcp xxx.xxx.249.199 2080 access-list Nat6
    static (outside,inside) 192.168.1.50 xxx.xxx.249.200 netmask 255.255.255.255
    static (inside,inside) xxx.xxx.249.197 192.168.1.50 netmask 255.255.255.255
    nat (inside) 0 access-list inside_nat0_outbound
    nat (inside) 199 access-list Mail
    nat (inside) 1 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0
    I included other cli but changes the ip addresses.
    I am trying to allow my server behind the firewall to send http traffic to itself.  Currently blocked by rule 35&36 in the gui.

  • A 1 pixel gap appears on webpage on the ipad or when zoomed on a Mac with Firefox 4

    I'm having an issue with a website having a 1 pixel gap under various OS's and browsers.
    http://www.coffeeandcream.ca/
    When viewed on an iPad it shows a 1 pixel gap on the right side of the link icons.  When you zoom on the iPad, the gap disappears and reappears at random zoom factors.
    When viewed on my Mac Pro under Firefox (version 4) it is fine to start, but when zoomed, random images have the 1 pixel gap sometimes above and below or to the left or right or sometimes both above/below and left/right.
    I'm not over worried about the behaviour of Firefox...since it is only when the page is zoomed.
    When I view it on my Windows PC, I have no issue with the gap under Firefox 3 or 4, or IE.
    Any thoughts on what is going on?
    Thanks in advance,

    Have you thought of entering the following code at the very top of your CSS file?
                    margin: 0;
                    padding: 0;
                    border: 0;
    This should reset the browser of your iPad and FF in Mac.  I use neither so I can't test it at my end.  the above code is not likely to affect any other standards compliant browsers.
    hth

  • Unbounded element in Business Rules

    Hi everyone,
    I am trying to achieve in returning the same element (unbounded) when the rules condition are satisfied. I want to return the below response message:
    <newJoinerRulesResponse>
    <Rule>
    <Code>Example</Code>
    <Description>test</Description>
    </Rule>
    <Rule>
    <Code>Example2</Code>
    <Description>test2</Description>
    </Rule>
    </newJoinerRulesResponse>
    As you can see the rule engine need to return more then one element Rule. How can I achieve this? I my example I am using two rules:
    1.When the salary is > 50000 then create element rule, with code = Example and Description = test
    2. When the age of a person is not between 16 and 65 then create an extra element rule with code = example2 and Description = test2
    The Rule element in my xsd schema is unbounded. This will create an fact RuleType from type list. The problem with the type list that I cant create a new RuleType, while this is possible without the unbounded element. However then I can only create one Rule element in the response (and not two what I really want!). I think the way forward is a function. The function I created named AddRulesElement consist of the below code:
    - I have created three parameters: arg_code that retrieved the value used for element Code, one for the element Description (arg_description) and one parameter based on type ResultRulesType (arg_resulttype). This is the complextype containing the element Rule.
    The code in the body is:
    assign new RuleType ResultRule = new RuleType()
    assign ResultRule.code = arg_code
    assign ResultRule.description = arg_description
    call arg_resulttype.rule.add (ResultRule.code.length(), ResultRule)
    From the two rule set I then call the function as follow:
    IF NewJoinerRulesType.salary > 50000
    THEN
    **call AddRulesElement (arg_code: "Example", arg_description: "Test", arg_resultype: ResultRulesTypes)**
    IF NewJoinerRulesType.age < 16 or NewJoinerRulesType.age > 65
    THEN
    **call AddRulesElement (arg_code: "Example2", arg_description: "Test2", arg_resultype: ResultRulesTypes)**
    This keep given me the below error:
    RUL-05164: The fact type "ResultRulesType" is referenced, but is not asserted nor input.
    Please help how I can achieve a response of two elements Rule!! I have included the xsd schema I use for the rules below.
    Many Thanks
    Ren
    P.s. please note my responses will be slow as I am away till next week Tuesday.
    My xsd schema is of the following structure:
    <?xml version= '1.0' encoding= 'UTF-8' ?>
    <xsd:schema xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema" xmlns:vnj="http://www.example/soa/initiative/definition/validateNewJoinerService/xsd/TestUnboundedRules_v1_0"
    targetNamespace="http://www.example/soa/initiative/definition/validateNewJoinerService/xsd/TestUnboundedRules_v1_0"
    elementFormDefault="qualified">
    <xsd:element name="newJoinerRulesRequest" type="vnj:newJoinerRulesType">
    <xsd:annotation>
    <xsd:documentation>A sample element</xsd:documentation>
    </xsd:annotation>
    </xsd:element>
    <xsd:element name="newJoinerRulesResponse" type="vnj:ResultRulesType">
    <xsd:annotation>
    <xsd:documentation>A sample element</xsd:documentation>
    </xsd:annotation>
    </xsd:element>
    <xsd:complexType name="newJoinerRulesType">
    <xsd:sequence>
    <xsd:sequence>
    <xsd:element name="Birthday" type="xsd:date"/>
    <xsd:element name="Salary" type="xsd:integer"/>
    </xsd:sequence>
    </xsd:sequence>
    </xsd:complexType>
    <xsd:complexType name="ResultRulesType">
    <xsd:sequence>
    <xsd:element name="Rule" type="vnj:RuleType" minOccurs="0" maxOccurs="unbounded"/>
    </xsd:sequence>
    </xsd:complexType>
    <xsd:complexType name="RuleType">
    <xsd:sequence>
    <xsd:element name="RuleSequence" type="xsd:integer" minOccurs="0"/>
    <xsd:element name="Code" type="xsd:string" minOccurs="0" maxOccurs="1"/>
    <xsd:element name="Description" type="xsd:string" minOccurs="0" maxOccurs="1"/>
    </xsd:sequence>
    </xsd:complexType>
    </xsd:schema>

    He everyone,
    I found out that I first need to insert an empty ResultType in the rule before I can call the function. This now works but at run-time I am now receiving the below error:
    Fact not found in the rule engine working memory, rule session execution failed. The rule session 70005 failed because an instance of the fact emample.soa.initiative.definition.validatenewjoinerservice.xsd.newjoinerrules_v1_0.ResultRulesType could not be found in the working memory of the rule session. This is most likely a rule modeling error. The decision service interaction expects the fact instance to exist in the working memory of the rule session. Check the rule actions in rule designer and make sure that a fact of the expected type is being asserted. If the error persists, contact Oracle Support Services. 70005
    I hope somebody can help!!
    Many Thanks
    Ren

  • I'm trying to remove paragraph rules from paragraphs in an InDesign document, but cannot because it (incorrectly) says they're already turned off

    So, basically what a title says. I'm working on a document for my employer in which some of the formatting is already in place. As part of that formatting, InDesign is adding horizontal rules after every paragraph, and there are some paragraphs for which this would not be appropriate, particularly bulleted lists, so I'm attempting to remove them. Problem is, when I select the paragraphs and pull up the Paragraph Rules dialog, it claims that the horizontal rules area already turned off, and that I therefore cannot remove them. Does anyone know what's going on or how to fix it?

    Hi,
    Have you checked that the paragraph rule is not "Rule Below"? Rule above is switched off, but Rule below may well be on. Select it in the popup shown in your screenshot.
    Regards,
    Malcolm

  • How to apply an InDesign Paragraph Rule above, but not when first in column

    How do I apply a paragraph rule "above" but not when first in a column. In other words, the rule above will only run if it isn't the first paragraph in the column (even if it appears in a multi-column text frame).
    Before you jump the gun: Rule below will not solve that, for various reasons.
    Thanks much in advance.

    Aha! Apparently totally!
    Here a similar way to yours with an anchored block. Copy it and launch this simple regex. Easy with no headache! 

Maybe you are looking for

  • Why do my saved / exported photos out of Lightroom have a little red dot on them?

    My edited photos in Lightroom look great.  But once I export them and take a look with another program (Photo Mechanic or Previewer), I see a little red dot on the photos. I have the latest version of Lightroom downloaded (5.7) and have tried restart

  • Import export in different encoding

    Is there a way to change an Import/Export Wizard's output in UTF encoding. Please help.

  • Mapping question - File to Webservice scenario

    Hi    I have a text file - that is pulled in by XI - using a ftp adapter - source interface. On the other side - target interface - we have a webservice whose definition is loaded into XI as a external interface defiinition - message type level. Now

  • Can I reference part of a menu (a child menu) in a page?

    I have my main menu in the navigation with several dropdowns like so: Programs |-- ProgramsChild1 |-- ProgramsChild2 |-- ProgramsChild3 About us |-- AboutUsChild1 |-- AboutUsChild2 |-- AboutUsChild3 Contact us In a template's sidebar, could I have a

  • Spry sub menu is not droping can some pls help

    the url is www.stan-tech.com <head> <title>STaNTech:- Systems Training and Networking Technology</title> <style type="text/css"> <!-- body { font: 100% Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; background: #666666; margin: 0; /* it's good practice to ze