QM-  After Result Recording

Helo Gurus,
I done result recording as rejected for perticuler operation , then also the operation is going to confirm in co11n, actually it should not confirm know.
What is actual process for that in QM? After rejection logically the operation should again done by the production deparment, that means....., please guide me, & provide the steps for the same.
Thanks

Dear Samir,
Keerthi is absolutely right. These scenarios has to be mapped with rework process. in standard QM there are no much control available please find some of the options you can do
1) Once you find that the material is rejected either you can say in the pop up screen for confirmation that is no confirmation, or make use of the rework process. You will have to use user exits to have a better control on the rework process.
2) Make your setting in such a way that only after production person confirms the rework order then only rejected material should be allowed to confirm in the next operation.
3) You can make use of this user exit to deal with all kind of controls in CONFPP05
Regards
Gajesh

Similar Messages

  • After Results Recording - Valid Samples = 2, Defects are doubled

    I carried out results recording - there were 13 characteristics and 7 of them failed.  In the Record Usage Decision screen 14 Defects are shown (instead of 7) and under the Characteristics tab, it shows 2 valid samples for each characteristics.
    The result is that these increased defects are causing some confusion and 2 duplicate notifications are being created when the usage decision is made and the lot is saved.  Can anyone help explain why this is happening, and how I can make it stop doubling?

    Please see below SAP explanation.
    Note: The defect record is generated as a result of a valuation rule. This rule determines whether a defect record is to be created and if so, which code is to be used for the record. Since the valuation rules are stored as function modules in Customizing, you can adapt the way defect records are generated and their contents without having to make a program change.
    Example: If you record results for samples, inspection points, etc., the system creates a defect record with the assignment inspection lot/operation/inspection characteristic, each time an inspection characteristic is refected. In addition, the standard system creates an additional defect record for the inspection lot/operation/sample (or inspection point, physical sample, equipment). This is, however, not always advisable. You can use the SapNet - R/3 Frontend note 107223/1998 to ensure that this additional defect record is not created. You achieve this by storing your own valuation module (or by changing an existing one) in Customizing.
    I hope the above explains why you got 14 defect records for 7 rejections.
    Hope it helps.
    Thanks,
    Ram

  • Reset inspection plan after results recording

    Dear all,
    i had one problem to be cleared, if u can please solve it.
    My problem is i have assigned wrong inspection plan for one insp. lot, and i have recorded results and saved. My question is there any provision that i can reset the other inspection plan for that particular lot and record resullts again.

    Hi Vijay,
    Goto QA11/QA12 Change Udage Decision enter the inspection lot number and select Usage Decision -->Functions -->Cancel Lot.
    Then cancel the Material Document by which the Inspection lot was created.
    Then make the GR and new lot will be generated. Then assign the Inspection Plan, Results Recording.
    Thanks and regards
    Murugesan

  • Result recording to be done after UD with long term inspection

    Dear All
    I have activated two MIC's for long term inspection. Inspection lot is created and UD is provided after Result recording. i have run QA12 and go to EDIT/RESET/INSPECTION COMPLETION.  status of UD changed to LTIN and then in Qe51 / qe51n i selected long term inspection but error message is coming '' NO CHARACTERISTICS WERE FOUND". Plz help , how to do result recording after UD.

    Dear Even if the char is long terms & if you have forcefully completed the chars then even if char has LTIN status it will not allow you.
    But check this in your sandbox and revert.
    1. In the MIC set the 'Optional Characteristic' and 'Long tem inspection ' in the control indiactors.
    2. Attach MIC in inspection Plan
    3. Do results recording and comlpete UD. all short term charactericts are closed.
    4. QA12Change UD with history for Inspection Lot ,
    Menu-> Reset inspection completion -> Status changes to LTIN
    5. Goto QA02 --> you woudl see " do you wnat to compete Long term inspections" --> yes
    6. Then Long term inspection characterictic is open for results recording.
    7. Change and complete results --> Make UD
    Check and Revert.
    Cheers
    KK

  • Decimal places display at the time of results recording

    Dear All,
    Please i faced one problem, At the time of results recoridngi/.e,
    In my insp. plan i defined Quantitative specification as 70.0 with '1' decimal place in Qunatitative data. but after results recording it displaying one more decimal place excessi.e., as 70.00. How can i solve this problem, due to what this problem is occure. Please if any, solve its urgent.
    Regards,
    Vijaya

    Dear Vijaya,
    While entering Inspection Characteristics.. There is a field called DecPlaces on the right. its the  24th field on the item table.
    The field comes after
    Method, Insp Method plant, Version, Sampling Procedure, Sample Unit of Measure, Base Sample Quantity, SPC Criterion, Modification Rule, Test Eqpmt, Test Equip Short Text, Par Sample, DecPlace, Unit of Measure, Target Value, Lower spec Lmt, Upper Spec Lmt... and so on...
    Regards
    Vijay

  • QM-result recording after doing usage dcision and stock posting.

    HI gurus,
    My client is steel manufacturing industry.The requirement of client is that, after doing usage decision and stock posting they want to do result recording.Thy want it like this because in case of urgency they pass the material and afterward they do the result recording.Is such a scenario is possible in standard sap.If yes pls. provide me the solution.
    Thanks in advance.

    I wouls suggest you look at Jan's suggestion.  Setting everything as LT characteristics is
    1) not a good quality practice
    2) you would still have to manually to the UD I believe, auto UD won't work.  So if you have to manually process the lot anyway, you may as well just make the sotck posting and leave the lot open for results recording.
    Craig

  • Changing result Recorded after UD and Insp Stock posted.

    Hi,
    Is it possible to revoke or change the result recorded after UD is given and also stock posted for material.
    In inspection plan i have activated the  long term inspection check box for that particular MIC for which i want to change the results.
    I have done UD reversal, stock reversal etc.
    Then
    I hv tried through QE02 but its showing:
    Short term Inspection Completed.
    All Insp.Completed.
    UD has been Made.
    pls suggest the possible solution on this.
    Rgds,
    Yogesh

    Dear sujit,
    We have Ztcode developed for Stock posting reversal not for UD reversal.
    Just want to know inspite of checking box for Long term planning in MIC also in Inspection plan.
    Is there any provision for reentering results for already closed MICs.
    User has made wong input entry while recording results.
    Rgds,
    Yogesh

  • Prevent entering result recording after the production order closed.

    Hi QM Gurus,
    I want to prevent entering the result recording (we used inspection point) after the corresponding production order was closed.
    Please help.
    Cheers,
    Sun

    hi all,
    Enhancement QEEM0015 is only used for individual result, it can not be used for summerized result.
    Enhancement QEEM0011 is the right one for my case.
    It works before the system valuates the inspectoin characteristics' result for both individual and summerized result.
    Thanks all for your help.
    Regards,
    Sun

  • Error in operation level result recording

    Hi,
    I need held; result recording of inspection type =03 (operation level Quality inspection)
    A product manufacture via three operations (10, 20, 30)
    All operation quality inspection active let operation no-10, all products reject and confirm as rework.
    Next operation level quality record is done but confirmation not allow Reason is operation -10, rework quantity, (Actual quantity is more than planned quantity)
    How to add the quantity after reworks for next operation quality inspection?
    Pl helps me finding the solution.

    Hi,
    As per your more clearence , As per Example  production order Quanity =1, passes 3 operation10,20,30
    Operation=10 require rework as per quality ,
    Operation =20 system raise the error message = Operation =10 rework .
    If want to operation =10 ok Quantity =1 then system raise error messges =Actual quanity more than planned Quanitity
    ( 1 Rework + 1 Ok ) .
    Supose rework order create and confirm then next 20 & 30 operation how complete .
    Real scenerio :- Rework on operation =10 then again Quality check then goes to 20 operation Quality check pass / Rework if rework then again quality pass then goes to next operation level
    I hope under stand my problem
    Need help- please

  • Error while Result Recording-QM

    Dear friends,
    While RR for inspection lot I faced this error.
    Characteristic results cannot be recorded for inspection lot 06000000764
    Message no. QE181
    Diagnosis
    You cannot record any characteristic results for this inspection lot. The material master has been set up for the existing inspection type in such a way that results recording is not supported.
    Procedure
    Confirm defects for this inspection lot or select another inspection lot in which you can confirm the characteristic results.

    Dear Vipul,
    Check the System Status, it will be CRTD.
    Now select the material and click on Inspection Lot button.
    In this window , click on the Inspection Specification tab.
    Now click on the Task List / Spec. button.
    If this button now appears fainted after clicking then it is ok, then click on the Sample button , here click on the Smpl. button and this button will shown in fainted look. Now click on the Save button. It will bring you on the main screen of QA32 , now click on the Refresh button , you will notice its Status will change.
    If clicked on Task List / Spec. button and it shows an error message that No Inspection Plan Exists , then you will have to make an inspection plan using T-Code QP01. After making the Inspection Plan then follow the above steps.
    Hope this solves your problem.

  • In-process inspection- operation wise result recording sequence

    Hello Everyone,
    I have just come across a requirement and would be grateful if someone can help me out in this regard.
    1.     This is make to stock discrete manufacturing scenario.
    2.     Inspection type 03 has been activated in material master.
    3.     The setting in OPK4 are, error if no inspection results exist and error when operation sequence is not adhered to.
    4.     As a result of which I cannot confirm the operation in CO11N unless result recording is done for corresponding operation.
    The requirement,
    1.     User should not be able to carry out result recording for operation 30 unless at least 1 quantity of operation 20 (preceding operation) is confirmed. Likewise it should behave for rest of the operations.
    2.     Practically material is processed for operation 30 only if 20 is confirmed. Therefore operation 30 should be inspected after 20. System allows to input result recording for all the operations irrespective its confirmations.
    Is there any standard solution for this or should I go for any exit?
    Thank you,
    Anand Rao

    Hi Sujit,
    Thanks for so prompt response.
    I am using inspection point 100. Still it is not restricting. The operation confirmation is done through CO11N and not feasible for users to perform it through QM module.
    The logic is, if I try to carry out result recording for operation 30 , system should firstly check whether any confirmation number exists or (at least 1 quantity is confirmed)for previous operation i.e. 20. If not it must stop doing RR for 30 operation.
    Whether exits QEEM0011 and QEEM0015 can restrict this, as by their description I think these work after entering RR. Here it is required before RR. Any guesses?
    Thank you again for your kind reply.
    Regards,
    Anand
    An addition,
    Even though QEEM0011 works before valuation user is able to enter RR. The requirement is user should not enter the any RR irrespecive of valuation. If user enters RR and do not valuate it this exit may not work and eventually can allow to confirm OP30.
    Edited by: Anand Rao on Aug 24, 2011 1:21 PM

  • What is the setting- Pop up window 'Valuation' appears in Results Recording

    Hi,
    When i am doing Results recording in qa32, after processing all characteristics the status of all characteristics appears '5' but while saving it gives a pop-up window named 'valuation' where under 'valuate inspection point' sub screen field 'valuation' with entry 'Accept' in grey mode appears. Also a tab named 'valuation' appears on the same pop-up window with pencil symbol through with UD can be made in RR only.
    What is the setting because of which this pop up window comes while saving the results recording.
    Thanks in advance.
    Regards,
    Abhijit.

    HI,
    I am using insp. point 200 which have default valuse in valuation tab. In functional module tab no FM are attached.
    What are the setting required tobe changed in i want to use Insp. Point and do not want the Pop up window of Valuation.
    In some other cases i am using point and pop up doesn't come.
    Abhi.

  • Result Recording of Inspection Characterstics.

    Hi Gurus,
    Actually we have one scenario in QA in which for one material there are certain specification whose result we will come to know few days later after posting inspection lot in Unrestricted & also after doing UD.
    I want to know how to do result recording for that perticular specification after we already did the UD for that lot?
    Is it possible after UD?
    Is there any additional customization setting nedded?
    Thanks in advance.

    Hi,
    You can do this .
    Those MIC for which you want to take result after UD .In control indicator of MIC put long term inspection check box on .
    So that even after UD of inspection lot ,  result record for that MIC will remain open for you to take result.
    Regards
    SANIL
    Edited by: Sanil Vadke on Jun 29, 2010 8:53 AM

  • Block the authorization in QM results recording

    Hi All...
    I am a QM consultant ...Have some problem reg authorization...
    we have 2 level of authorization in QM module.
    Where 1st level is only allowed to record the results, they should not be allowed reopen the closed results and edit the result. This we tried to do by using the result record status (Tcode for results recording QE01). but not able to restrict the users. the thing is when user enter the result and after doing the valuaiton & closing the status becomes - 5. after that the user should not be allowed to reopen means status - 2. How to do it???
    Please share some inputs....
    srini

    Hello Srinivas,
    For the inspector to valuate the result he needs authorization of value 3 for QESTATNEW, for closing he needs value 5 for QESTATNEW and for putting in process he needs value 2 for QESTATNEW.
    Similarly, the initial status should be 1, 2, 3, 5 & 6 for successfully completing the operation.
    Say, if the he does not have 3 for QESTATNEW then the valuate button (balance) will be disabled so he wont be able to change the status of the characteristic to 3.
    If he does not have 5 for QESTATNEW then the close button (closed lock) will be disabled so he wont be able to change the status to 5.
    If he does not have 2 for QESTATNEW then the put in process button (open lock) will be disabled so he wont be able to change status of the characteristic back to 2.
    I hope I have cleared your doubt.
    Regards,
    Subbu

  • Preventing UD without results recording

    HI,
    We are able to do force closing of the inspection lots without results recording by registering the UD directly. How to prevent this? i.e. we dont want to register UD for lots without result recording for all the characterisitics. With User status we cannot achieve this because if we register results for some characteristics also the system status will be updated.
    Regards,
    Ravi Kumar C.

    hi
    yes as Mr.Shyamal mentioned, you can get through User status and in MIC slect the Required Characteristic radio button on control indicators,
    If you set this indicator, the inspection characteristic must be inspected.
    This means that you can only make a usage decision for the inspection lot after you have confirmed inspection results for this inspection characteristic.
    -pl check
    -ashok

Maybe you are looking for

  • My iPhone 4s is no longer working.

    My iPhone 4s is no longer working. It kept turning off and on on it's own and i tried to restore it. I pressed the lock and home button. I connected it to itunes as it says. Once in itunes it says the iPhone is on recovery mode and then when it is su

  • How Do I Remove Photo Downloader Icon from the notification area (system tray)

    Yes, this should be simple, but I'm baffled. Can the icon be permanently removed, or at least when when the Album Starter is not in use... other than clicking on "exit" which only brings it back when the computer is restarted without removing the pro

  • Xi and WAS

    hi.. let me know r there any components which reside on Xi and not on WAS..??? if yes, kindly ellaborate.... regards. vishal

  • Help identifying a port

    Hey, I just got a w510 and am having trouble identifying a port right above the usb/eSATA combo port. It's long and thin, almost looks like it's meant for setting RFID cards or something. Any body have any clues? I can't seem to find any specs on it.

  • Crosstab formatting.

    I have cross tabs on several GF's that have a count{of field)and then a percent of the count{field}. The percent are listed in whole numbers with out in decimals - like 45% or 85% or 100%......The user would like them to be out to wo decimals - like