QM Certificate results

Hello,
Is there any FM that allows me to obtain the results as if i was gonna print a certificate for a determinate delivery note?
Thank you
Nuno Silva

Hello Gajesh,
Time being requirement for inspection point has been withdrawn by client. Hence I did development using tables mentioned above.
However I studied BAPI opted by you. This will definately solve all inspection point related issues. In case of further queries I will come back to you for sure.
I am closing this thread awarding full points to you
Thanks again for your so prompt help!
Best Regards,
Anand Rao

Similar Messages

Multiple Digital Signatures (certificates) results in VERY slow PDF

I created a form in Lifecycle that typically has 8 signatures. As more signatures are added the form slows down significantly. Our director, who ultimately signs off on the document, has informed us that it took him 35+ minutes to approve 3 documents. The forms are on a network drive. I had read some old threads that mentioned this issue was being investigated and the newer versions of Acrobat should help speed up this process. We are currently running Acrobat X 10.1.4. Any suggestions as to what might be slowing things down? I know the digital signatures require validating and expect it to slow things down a bit but 11+ minutes is probably more than it should be. Thanks

Hi,
Just out of curiousity, if the form has been Reader Enabled, and, if the director could download the free Adobe Reader v11 from the Adobe web site, and he signs the file using version 11, is the signing process faster? It should be much faster in version 11 because we fixed the recursive validation issue that made dealing with multiple signatures so slow.
If you're interested in the nuts and bolts read on, but if not I'll understand...
The way signature validation use to work is Acrobat (and Reader as well because because the signature creation and validation mechanisms are the same in both) would start to validate signature number 8 right after the signature was created (it needs to do the validation so it knows whether or not to put the green check mark next to the signature). As part of the validation process it would need to re-validate each previous signature (and this is where things start to get weird). In order to validate signature 7 it has to also validate all previous signatures (6 thru 1) and every time it validates a new signature it has to do all of the previous signatures. Each signature would get validated as many times as it was part of the revision list. That is, signature 1 got validated eight times, signature 2 seven times and so on.
Begining with version 11 (or XI as it says in the product) we stopped all of the recursive validation and just do each signature once which makes the signature validation process much quicker. I'm always looking for real world examples, and if you can test it with Reader XI I'd appreciate knowing the results.
Thanks,
Steve

Using code signing certificate results in classnotfoundexception

We are running a certificate authority on windows 2012. Our programming section developed a java application on linux and wanted to code sign it. They created a csr and sent it to me. I created a duplicate of the built in code signing template and used it
to create a code signing certificate, which I sent back to the programmer. He used the certificate to sign the application jar file, and everything seemed ok. But when we try running the application we get a 'classnotfoundexception' for the main class of the
program. Just to be sure it was not a fluke I wrote a small test applet and went through the same procedure of creating a csr, creating the certificate, and code signing the jar file, and ended up getting the same exact error.
The programmer tried creating a self signed certificate on linux and using that to code sign the jar file, and the program runs successfully. Of course there is a warning that the certificate is untrusted, which is why we ant to use the windows created certificate
to sign the application since the root certificate in on everyone's computer.
Is there anything special needed to be done to get the windows created certificate to successfully sign a java application?

Hi David, did you ever get it to work signing the applet with an Active Directory Certificate Services certificate?
We are exeperiencing the same issue. The odd thing is that after we get the ClassNotFoundException error, we click on the error and then click reload and then it loads fine. At this point we are probably going to try purchasing a certificate
to see if ADCS was the problem. Curious to see if you had any luck. Thanks.

Certificates from CA's and the keystore

Hello all,
I have tracked through a series of forum topics that seem to ask similar questions and receive similar answers regarding both signing jars and using the certificates for communications.
Forgive the overlap, but I have a slightly related question.
Is the only way to use the keystore (and keytool to manage the keystore) when signing jars by generating a key pair at the start? Is that why all the examples always start with that option, and none of them start from a scenario that is different?
Is it possible to come in with an existing CA signed certificate, and the CA's root certificate and sign the jars? Would that setup work for communication at all?
I have tried this for signing, and both certificates end up as trustedCertEntries within the keystore, but this does not allow the signing of jars since there is no keyEntry. The error message is:
"jarsigner: Certificate chain not found for: and. and must reference a valid KeyStore key entry containing a private key and corresponding public key certificate chain."
I have not tried it for communication.
Is there some other alternative to generating the key-pair directly in the keystore, exporting the csr, and getting the CA to sign and reply to that csr?
My question stems from a customer wanting to only provide the certificate they want to use, and maybe the CA root cert if necessary.
Thanks much in advance!
Edited by: gennadius on Dec 19, 2007 3:52 PM

Is it possible to come in with an existing CA signed certificateBut this isn't the beginning of the process.
A signed certificate results from a Certificate Signing Request (CSR) being submitted to a CA.
A CSR is generated from a private key/public key pair. But it only contains the public key. So you have to get it signed and then re-import it to the same keystore which originally contained the private key, to complete the association between the signed cert and the private key.
The signed certicificate is a public authentication that the owner of this certificate uniquely owns this public key, which corresponds to a private key. Without the private key the entire exercise can't get started.
So unless you can find a way to get the private key from whereever it was when the CSR process was started, just importing the signed certificate doesn't give you a prioviate key. Without a private key, you can't sign things, decrypt, be an SSL authenticated endpoint, etc.
And if you could cart private keys around like that, they wouldn't be private, so the entire point of PKI is lost.

Calibration report / certificate

Dear PM Guru's
please suggest me is there any standard report for calibration certificate / results recording / which should include inspection specifications? along with the usage decisions?
please suggest me.
regards
jalu

Hi,
You can get the inspection report in transaction QA32. Inspection value and usage decision is available in that t code.
In qa32 - enter ur inspection lot origin. in List settings select only inspection lot with usage decision. it will show ur completed inspection lots. select line item and generate inspection report.
Best regards,
G.Sathish

Java 1.7u45 unexpected unsigned website is untrusted popup

Hello all,
I'm experiencing an unexpected security warning in our jnlp app.
Background
With the advent of Java 1.7.u45, I made the necessary adjustments with the intent of getting rid of the security popups being presented in this version. My changes included:
1. Adjusting the jar files' manifests as documented in 1.7u45 (all-permissions, codebase *, etc).
2. Creating an APPLICATION.JNLP to 'digitally sign' our jnlp
2. Signing our jar files with a Verisign codesigning certificate
Results
Upon deployment, i do get the desired benign popup from Java acknowledging that the application is trusted etc, together with the check-box to 'not show this again'. That's fine, and this implies our codesigning and security prerequisites are correctly in place.
However, prior to that, i get a popup indicating that the 'web-site is untrusted' including the yellow box indicating that the application will be blocked in the future due to jars not containing the permissions attribute.
This seems incorrect. Why would one popup imply that everything is ok, jars included, while the other one doesn't ?
True our website is self-signed, but that's because our company's product is a networking device containing a web server + jnlp application which we market. Our customers configure the device to any IP address they want, and place it into their networks. I spoke with Verisign about this, and they say its impossible for them to issue a trusted certificate for a complete wildcard address. I am sure there are plenty of other developers out there who have the same problem with a similar product ->end user widlcard address relationship. We're stuck !!! What do we do ??? And why does Oracle threaten to block our application (because of no permissions attribute settings - which as i mentioned are set) in the same message about the web site being un-trusted ?
Jonathan

I have the same issue. Found this information on an IBM support page:
http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg21654628
Which states:
NOTE : The warning (displayed in a yellow box in the dialogue above) is displayed in error and it has been signalled that it is targeted for removal in a subsequent release of the Oracle JRE, and IBM equivalent.
Anyone knows if there's an official bug filed for this?
Thanks.

EXC13 cu7, Lync 2013 last updates OWA integration error

Hello,
we have 3 cas and 3 mbx exc13 cu7 environment
when a user from a specified database tries to log on OWA IM through OWA he can't
if we move mount the database to another mbx server it works fine
all users (where their databases are mounted at mbx2) are getting this error
I used this article
http://blogs.technet.com/b/jenstr/archive/2012/10/31/troubleshooting-tips-for-exchange-2013-owa-im-integration-to-lync-2013.aspx
and we got nothing new
always the same error on IM logging at mbx \ v15\logging\owa\ logs
2015-04-13T14:48:18.774Z,102,5,,,,0,DEBUG:Globals.Initialize: Initialization failed.,
Thiago Beier Se foi útil marca como resposta! Don´t forget to mark as answer!

Hi,
Please confirm if there is an event 103 on the Exchange Even Viewer when the user logs in OWA IM. If there is the event, please provide the detailed event log here for further analysis.
Please run the following command to check the certificate information in your Exchange server:
Get-ExchangeCertificate | fl
We need to collect the certificate thumbprint which is added in OWA web.config file and compare it with Exchange certificate results.
Generally, the certificate which is added in OWA web.config file on the MBX server(s) should be trusted by both Lync Server and Exchange. It is generally created by using your internal certificate authority on the mailbox server, making sure
that the server FQDN is used for the subject name and that this FQDN appears in the certificate alternate name field.
If it is not match, please create a new certificate from your
internal certificate authority on the mailbox server. Then add the certificate thumbprint in the right section of the OWA web.config file (<appSettings>), restart IIS service and check whether the issue persists.
Regards,
Please remember to mark the replies as answers if they help, and unmark the answers if they provide no help. If you have feedback for TechNet Support, contact [email protected]
Winnie Liang
TechNet Community Support

How do you know if trust certificate error about imap.aol server is the result of an imposter or the "real" aol imap server?

I keep receiving a trust certificate error about imap.aol server. Says it may be the result of an imposter or the "real" aol imap server? How do you determine if the trust certificate is for an imposter?

Please post a direct link to the page you're having trouble with.

Certificate error pops up from Google search results page

Hi,
I wanted to find out more info about a certain company, so I typed the name on Google. When I clicked on Search (not I'm feeling lucky!) the search results appeared, but I immediately got a pop-up saying the certificate for the website of the company in question was not valid:
"Secure Connection Failed
www.mvfaccount.com:443 uses an invalid security certificate.
The certificate is not trusted because the issuer certificate is unknown.
(Error code: sec_error_unknown_issuer)
This could be a problem with the server's configuration or it could be someone trying to impersonate the server.
If you have connected to this server successfully in the past the error may be temporary and you can try again later."
But the thing is: I hadn't even clicked on that search result! The warning appeared while the search results page was loading.
I find that unsettling because it makes me wonder: does Firefox visit the websites before I visit them?
And before you ask: no, I'm not a customer of that company (Maple Valley Financial) nor did I ever visit them before.
Thanks,
Sergio
== URL of affected sites ==
http://www.google.ca/search?source=ig&hl=en&rlz=1G1ACAW_ENCA389&=&q=maple+valley+financial&aq=f&aqi=g1&aql=&oq=&gs_rfai

I'm not sure how this could be a Firefox setting, but I would try the "usual" first:
When you have a problem with one particular site, a good "first thing to try" is clearing your Firefox cache and deleting your saved cookies for the site.
(1) Bypass Firefox's Cache
Use Ctrl+Shift+r to reload the page fresh from the server.
Alternately, you also can clear Firefox's cache completely using:
"3-bar" menu button (or Tools menu) > Options > Advanced
On the Network mini-tab > Cached Web Content : "Clear Now"
If you have a large hard drive, this might take a few minutes.
(2) Remove the site's cookies (save any pending work first). While viewing a page on the site, try either:
* right-click and choose View Page Info > Security > "View Cookies"
* Alt+t (open the classic Tools menu) > Page Info > Security > "View Cookies"
In the dialog that opens, you can remove the site's cookies individually.
Then try reloading the page. Does that help?
In case one of your extensions is involved, could you test the page in Firefox's Safe Mode? That's a standard diagnostic tool to deactivate extensions and some advanced features of Firefox. More info: [[Troubleshoot Firefox issues using Safe Mode]].
You can restart Firefox in Safe Mode using either:
* "3-bar" menu button > "?" button > Restart with Add-ons Disabled
* Help menu > Restart with Add-ons Disabled
Not all add-ons are disabled: Flash and other plugins still run
After Firefox shuts down, a small dialog should appear. Click "Start in Safe Mode" (''not'' Reset).
Any difference? If that helps, it could be that you selected to block that element in one of your add-ons.

I've installed iTunes 10.2.1 but my computer doesn't recognise the hardware certificate and denies it, and the installation isn't complete. This results in my iPod being unrecognised. Please help me! My system is a Windows XP.

I've installed iTunes 10.2.1 but my computer doesn't recognise the hardware certificate and denies it, and the installation isn't complete. This results in my iPod being unrecognised and so, it cant synchronize with iTunes. Please help me! My system is a Windows XP.

Malware can cause digital signing issues, I would run a malware check with the free version of MalwareBytes:
http://www.malwarebytes.org/
After that, the is a Microsoft fixit for:
The software you are installing has not passed Windows Logo testing to verify its compatibility with Windows XP. (Tell me why this testing is important.)
This software will not be installed. Contact your system administrator.
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/822798
It might be worth trying it.

I have been requested the certificate for iOS development since 4 days ago, but the result is still pending approval. So how many days should i wait?

i have been requested the certificate for IOS Development since 4 days ago, but the result is still pending approval. So how many days should i wait?

1. You did not get an error message telling you that your iPhoto library was getting full. You got a message telling you that your HD was getting full, right?
OS X needs about 10 gigs of hard drive space for normal OS operations - things like virtual memory, temporary files and so on.
Without this space your Mac will slow down as the OS hunts for space on the disk, files will be fragmented, also slowing things down, apps will crash and the risk of data corruption - that is damage to your files, photos, music - increases exponentially.
Your first priority is to make more space on that HD. Nothing else can be done until you do.
Purchase an external HD and move your Photos and Music to it. Both iPhoto and iTunes can run perfectly well with the Library on an external disk.
Your Library has been damaged from being run on an overfull disk.
How much free space on it now?

Web test result for a URL which needs a client certificate to authenticate

Hi,
we want to check URL response of a .asmx URL which needs a client certificate for authenticating.
I got the cert object and then passed it to invoke-webrequest cmdlet, but no matter what i try I always get this error
“The underlying connection was closed”.
code1
$WebClient = New-Object System.Net.WebClient
[System.Net.ServicePointManager]::ServerCertificateValidationCallback = {$true}
$WebClient.DownloadString(“https://server1/mywebservices/myser.asmx”)
code2
$url=”https://server1/mywebservices/myser.asmx”
$cert=(Get-ChildItem cert: -Recurse | where {$_.Thumbprint -eq “abcdefgh3333…..something”}| Select -First 1)
[System.Net.ServicePointManager]::ServerCertificateValidationCallback = {$true}
#load my client certificate defined by thumbprint
$HTTP_Request = [System.Net.WebRequest]::Create($url)
$HTTP_Request.ClientCertificates.Add($cert )
# We then get a response from the site.
$HTTP_Response = $HTTP_Request.GetResponse()
Can someone please help me.
Thanks
Manish

Hi Anna
Thanks for the reply.
I used the function referred earlier in my script, as below.
It is still throwing error. However it does work in powershell v2.
Is there any specific change required in the script to make it work with V3. I tried invoke-webrequest and it failed too.
function Ignore-SSLCertificates
$Provider = New-Object Microsoft.CSharp.CSharpCodeProvider
$Compiler = $Provider.CreateCompiler()
$Params = New-Object System.CodeDom.Compiler.CompilerParameters
$Params.GenerateExecutable = $false
$Params.GenerateInMemory = $true
$Params.IncludeDebugInformation = $false
$Params.ReferencedAssemblies.Add("System.DLL") > $null
$TASource=@'
namespace Local.ToolkitExtensions.Net.CertificatePolicy
public class TrustAll : System.Net.ICertificatePolicy
public bool CheckValidationResult(System.Net.ServicePoint sp,System.Security.Cryptography.X509Certificates.X509Certificate cert, System.Net.WebRequest req, int problem)
return true;
$TAResults=$Provider.CompileAssemblyFromSource($Params,$TASource)
$TAAssembly=$TAResults.CompiledAssembly
## We create an instance of TrustAll and attach it to the ServicePointManager
$TrustAll = $TAAssembly.CreateInstance("Local.ToolkitExtensions.Net.CertificatePolicy.TrustAll")
[System.Net.ServicePointManager]::CertificatePolicy = $TrustAll
$url="https://server1/mywebservices/myser.asmx"
$certs = Get-ChildItem Cert:\CurrentUser\My | where {
$_.Thumbprint -eq “abcdefgh3333…..something”}
$HTTP_Request = [System.Net.WebRequest]::Create($url)
Ignore-SSLCertificates
try
$HTTP_Request.ClientCertificates.Add($certs )
# We then get a response from the site.
$HTTP_Response = $HTTP_Request.GetResponse()
catch [System.exception]
Write-Error $error[0].Exception
$HTTP_Status = [int]$HTTP_Response.StatusCode
Manish

Re: Inspection Spec & Measured Results in Quality Certificate

Hi All,
I am facing an issue. I have scenario where I have to display some inspection characteristics on an outgoing quality certificate. Every thing is going Ok except for one inspection charateristic the Spec & the Measured values appearing on the certificate are not the one which they should be.I have tried a lot to investigate from where these values are fetched from .
Please provide some advice.
Regards,
Vivek

Dear Vivek,
I want to ask that is the report coming thru a development or you are using Standard SAP report by creating profiles??
If you are having a developed report thru your ABAP Teap, then simply it is a problem relating to wrong picking of data. Just ask to your ABAP personnel to check it.
And if it is a Standard SAP report then you have to check your settings & options as advised above.
Please give me the feedback about your findings.
Regards.

How to to check exam score/Result online and OCA certificate

Hi Team,
Recently i have written 1Z0-052 Oracle Database Adminstartion (OCA) done. I got mail with URLs but i am unable to see the score in exam.
Also i wouls like to see OCA certificate. Please suggest.
Thnaks,
Ven

Find the certification forum and ask there.

Cloud service - Uploading package files results in certificate error

Hi,
I want to upload a Cloud Service (Visual Studio 2013) to Azure but get the error "The certificate
with the thumbprint 4bbc8b9188d0e321198a9069b8a0a1c06709e6cb was not found." (in German "Das Zertifikat mit dem Fingerabdruck 4bbc8b9188d0e321198a9069b8a0a1c06709e6cb wurde nicht gefunden").
What I have done:
Created a valid Azure subscription (successful)
On the Azure Portal created a Cloud Service (successful)
In Visual Studio created a new Project of type "Windows Azure Cloud Service" > "WCF Service Web Role" (successful)
Hint: I didn't change the predefined settings (HTTP endpoint) and I didn't change any config file!
In Visual Studio built the solution (successful)
In Visual Studio created the package files (successful)
On the Azure Portal started to upload the package files which I have generated before (not successful!!!)
--> The upload terminates with the error message mentioned above.
Do I need a certification though it's a HTTP endpoint?
Where does the thumbprint (4bbc8b9188d0e321198a9069b8a0a1c06709e6cb) in the error message comes from? It seems that Azure needs a certificate with exactly this thumbprint. But why?
Can anybody help me?

hi Sir,
Did you try to logon in using your azure account or imported your Azure subscription in VS? I am afraid your package lack the windows azure tools certificate. So you could try those methods:
http://blogs.msdn.com/b/avkashchauhan/archive/2012/05/10/downloading-windows-azure-publish-settings-subscription-configuration-file.aspx
Also, you could try to select "publish" method to deploy your project to Azure.
Please try it.
Regards,
Will
We are trying to better understand customer views on social support experience, so your participation in this interview project would be greatly appreciated if you have time. Thanks for helping make community forums a great place.
Click
HERE to participate the survey.

QM Certificate results

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for